Herbicidal compositions containing an n-phosphonomethylglycine adduct of sulphuric acid and a method for controlling vegetation utilizing the same

Description of the Art

The unique herbicidal properties of glyphosate and several of its more soluble salts are renowned. As reported by Grossbard and Atkinson in The Herbicide Glyphosate, Butterworths, Boston, 1985, and by J. E. Franz in U.S. Patent No. 3,799,758 and in Israel Specifications 37,993, 38,940 and 47,972, glyphosate is a broad spectrum, nonselective, post-emergent herbicide having high unit activity on a wide variety of both annual and perennial plants. It can be manufactured and applied as glyphosate per se or any one of a very broad variety of glyphosate derivatives and homologues which, according to Franz, include halogen; hydroxy; thio; ammonium; monoand di-alkylamine; hydroxy-alkyl and alkenyl amine, hydrocarbyl, hydrocarbonoxyhydrocarbyl, halohydrocarbyl, and halo-hydro-carbonoxyhydrocarbyl esters and thioesters; ami nohydrocarby!; metallo-oxy including alkali and alkaline earth, copper, zinc, manganese and nickel-oxy; aminoxy; organic aminoxy; and/or strong acid salt derivatives and homologs. According to Franz, supra, the alkali, alkaline earth, ammonium and organic amine salts are preferred. The isopropyl amine salt is marketed by Monsanto Chemical Company as Roundup”.

According to Grossbard et al., supra, when glyphosate is contacted with plant foliage, it is translocated to the plant roots, rhyzomes, and apical meristemes giving it its systemic property and resulting in the total destruction of many resistant perennial weeds such as rhyzome sorghum halepense, Agropyron repens, Cirsium arvense, Cyprus spp., C. dactylon, and others. Glyphosate, per se, has

Arelatively broad herbicidal utility since it is active on a variety of vegetation. It is systemic, non-persistent, and is readily metabolized by soil microorganisms to form plant nutrients, including phosphoric acid, ammonia, and carbon dioxide. Thus, glyphosate is environmentally attractive in comparison to many alternative herbicides.

For these reasons, glyphosate-containing herbicides are marketed in over 100 countries and are used to control undesired vegetation in crop lands, plantations, orchards, industrial and recreational areas, and for home use.

As with all things in nature, however, there is always room for improvement. While glyphosate is a very active, broad spectrum, systemic, relatively environmentally safe herbicide, its solubility in water at 25® C. is only 1.2 weight percent and many of its homologues and salts are only slightly soluble or are essentially insoluble in water and organic solvents. For instance, Franz illustrated that the glyphosate-hydrochloric acid salt is essentially insoluble in either water or tetrahydrofuran. Glyphosate is expensive and, when applied at recommended dosages as the isopropylamine salt, it does not completely control all plant species and maximum control does not occur for 1 to 3 weeks depending on plant species, dosage, etc. Moreover, many of the organic amine salts preferred by Franz have negative environmental effects which are not exhibited by the parent compound itself. For instance, the isopropylamine salt is toxic to fish and is not approved, at least not in the United States, for use on aquatic vegetation. The active portion of the molecule in the deliverable (water soluble) compounds — the glyphosate segment -- is relatively chemically unstable even in weakly basic environments. Thus, glyphosate is hydrolyzed in weak base which may account for its failure to control vegetation in some instances. Mineral dust which accumulates on vegetation is generally alkaline, and hydrolysis which can occur in that environment (presumably at the amide link in the compound) deactivates glyphosate as a herbicide.

Several investigators have found that the herbicidal activity of glyphosate and its compounds can be increased in certain respects by formulation with other

-4compounds. For instance, Grossbard and Atkinson, supra, report at page 226, that, under suitable conditions, ammonium salts, such as ammonium sulfate, can increase the phytotoxicity of a variety of water-soluble leaf-applied herbicides, including certain water-soluble glyphosate derivatives. According to Grossbard et al., these effects are evident particularly when ammonium salts such as ammonium sulfate are combined with the appropriate surfactant (ibid., page 228). The effects of several other compounds have also been investigated. For instance, Grossbard et al., report, at page 229, that ammonium salts other than ammonium sulfate have shown improved herbicidal effects in isolated studies and that those effects are less than have been observed in other instances with ammonium sulfate. They also report that, in one test on C. rotundas, slight improvement in glyphosate activity was observed upon addition of urea to the formulation. Other investigators have studied the relative effects of hydrophilic and lipophilic surfactants in the presence or absence of other components such as ammonium salts (Grossbard et al., ibid., page 228). Polybasic acids such as orthophosphoric and oxalic acids reportedly have shown improvement for the control for Agropyron repens when used in combination with certain soluble glyphosate derivatives (Grossbard et al., supra, page 230). While the precise mode of action of the previously tested ammonium salts, surfactants, polybasic acids, and other additives is not known with certainty, it has been suggested that certain ammonium salts modify plant membrane permeability but do not appear to directly influence translocation, while the polybasic acids may improve activity of the isopropylamine salt by sequestering and/or immobilizing metals such as calcium (ibid, page 230). However, the herbicidal effectiveness, per se, of glyphosate compounds and compositions, according to Franz, is not affected by the type of salt, i.e., the glyphosate counter-ion. Thus,

-579848/2 in the chapter dealing with the discovery, development, and chemistry of glyphosate published by Grossbard et al., supra, Franz states that [a]fter penetration into leaf tissue, therefore, glyphosate exists in the apoplast primarily in its monoanionic form and is translocated via the ploem as the dianion. The similar herbicidal effectiveness of (

glyphosate acid and many of its soluble salts . . /indicates that the counter-ion may influence formulation solubility but not overall biological activity. (Grossbard et al., supra, p. 9)

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Briefly, the invention provides novel liquid, water-soluble, herbicidal adducts of glyphosate, or its derivatives, and sulfuric acid and/or an adduct of glyphosate, sulfuric acid and a chalcogen compound of the formula! R! - CX - R₂ where X is oxygen or sulfur, R! and R_z are independently selected from hydrogen, monovalent organic radicals having 10 carbons or less, NR₃R₄ and NR_S wherein R₃ and R₄are independently selected from hydrogen and monovalent organic ⁰ radicals having 10 carbons or less and R₅ is a divalent organic radical having 10 carbons or less, provided that at least one of R! and R₂ is NR₃R₄ or NR₅. These combinations contain (or form upon evaporation of solvent) reaction products of glyphosate, or its derivatives, and sulfuric acid and/or of glyphosate, sulfuric acid and the defined chalcogen compounds. The invention also provides novel methods for controlling vegetation with such compositions.

A79848

These compositions possess many advantages in comparison to glyphosate and its homologs and derivatives, including the metal and amine salts preferred by Franz, supra, and the commercially available, water soluble organic amine salts (e.g., Roundup). The sulfuric acid-containing combinations are much more soluble than glyphosate, and they are substantially more chemically stable, lees toxic, less costly to manufacture, and more active on a wider variety of vegetation than the amine salts such as the isopropylamine salt. The glyphosate-sulfuric acid and glyphosate-sulfuric acid-chalcogen compound compositions may be either solids or liquids, and concentrated liquid systems can be produced which contain only glyphosate and sulfuric acid and which are solvent-free, completely stable at room temperature, and miscible with water or other polar solvents in all proportions. Thus, they eliminate the need for toxic, expensive organic amine derivatives, such as the isopropylamine salt, which can be toxic to the environment and to animals such as fish. Yet they provide concentrated, water-soluble, chemically stable, fast-acting, broad spectrum, non-caustic, herbicidal formulations which easily can be manufactured, shipped, stored and applied. Thus, these compositions and methods reduce the expense and the environmental and health hazards involved in plant control by reducing the cost and toxicity of the herbicidal agent and the quantity of material which must be applied. It also has been found that glyphosate attenuates several properties of sulfuric acid, including its corrosivity.

The novel compositions are faster acting and broader spectrum herbicides, and they provide rapid, thorough control of species not adequately controlled by the organoamine-glyphosate formulations. In effect, they broaden the range of species on which the glyphosate component is active. In particular, the compositions of this invention are more active for the control of broad leaf plants than are other glyphosate-containing formulations. They are also more chemically stable than other compositions containing glyphosate since they minimize the activity loss which otherwise results from hydrolysis of the glyphosate unit under alkaline conditions which may exist on dusty plant foliage, in application equipment, and in water used for dilution.

/2

The chemical stability and apparent potentiation of glyphosate in the novel compositions may be due, in part, to direct potentiation of glyphosate activity by the acid and urea components and to the resistance to base hydrolysis which may be imparted by the sulfuric acid component. While sulfuric acid apparently potentiates glyphosate's herbicidal activity and improves its chemical stability and solubility, the glyphosate component, in effect, tames the acid by attenuating its corrosivity and reactivity to equipment, personnel, and clothing. For instance, while the 1/1 glyphosate/H₂S0₄ molar ratio reaction product contains 36 weight percent sulfuric acid, it does not immediately burn skin or char clothing as would aqueous solutions containing an equivalent amount of free sulfuric acid.

Due to these and other advantageous characteristics, the glyphosate-sulfuric acid-containing compositions of this invention reduce the expense involved in vegetation control; they are easier to handle, store, ship, and apply. They are less toxic to the environment, and impart less residue in crops due to their higher specific activity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The herbicidal compositions of this invention involve adducts of sulfuric acid and glyphosate [N-(phosphono-methyl)glycine] and of sulfuric acid, glyphosate, and chalcogen compounds of the formula R! - CX - R₂ where X is oxygen or sulfur, R! and R₂ are independently selected from hydrogen, monovalent organic radicals having 10 carbons

A79848 or less, NR₃R₄ amd NR_S wherein R₃ and R₄ are independently selected from hydrogen and monovalent organic radicals having 10 carbons or less, and R_s is a divalent organic radical having 10 carbons or less, provided that at least one of R! amd R₂ is NR₃R₄ or NR₅. These adducts contain (or form upon evaporation of solvent) reaction products of glyphosate, or its derivatives, and sulfuric acid and/or of glyphosate, sulfuric acid and the described chalcogen compounds. The term glyphosate as used herein is intended to denote N-phosphonomethyl glycine itself, as well as the derivatives thereof which form adducts with sulfuric acid. The methods involve the control of vegetation with such compositions.

It has been found that sulfuric acid is capable of reversibly reacting with glyphosate and with combinations of glyphosate and the described chalcogen compounds under certain reaction conditions, and that glyphosate reac5 tion products of sulfuric acid can be formed. Under appropriate conditions, as described herein, the glyphosatechalcogen compound reaction product with sulfuric acid, which contains one mole of each of the three constituents, can also be formed. Application of any one or a combina10 tion of these constituents to plant foliage rapidly and effectively controls the treated plant.

Surprisingly, concentrated sulfuric acid, a strong Lowry-Bronsted acid and very strong dehydrating agent, does not dehydrate the glyphosate component as it 15 does sugars and many other organic compounds. Nor does it react with glyphosate to form a crystalline, water-insoluble salt as reported by Franz, for concentrated hydrochloric acid. The 1/1 glyphosate/sulfuric acid reaction product is a water-soluble, chemically and physically 20 stable, non-corrosive, non-toxic liquid at ambient conditions. The 2/1 glyphosate/l^SO^ and 1/1/1 glyphosate/ chalcogen compound/HjSO^ molar products are very soluble in water at ambient conditions, and they are also chemically and physically stable, non-toxic, non-corrosive liquids. 25 Sulfuric acid-glyphosate reaction products which contain 2 moles of sulfuric acid per mole of glyphosate as well as those which contain 3 moles of sulfuric acid per mole of glyophosate can also be formed. Excess sulfuric acid may also be present, although such combinations are presently 30 less preferred due to their higher corrosivity. In contrast, combinations of glyphosate and hydrochloric acid form water-insoluble, corrosive, toxic, chemically unstable mixtures which gradually evolve hydrogen chloride, ultimately leaving only glyphosate.

Without intending to be constrained to any particular theory, the sulfuric acid reaction products with glyphosate or with glyphosate and the chalcogen compounds may contain one or more combinations of the reactants including adducts of sulfuric acid and glyphosate or of sulfuric acid, glyphosate, and the chalcogen compound. The diglyphosate adduct of sulfuric acid is illustrated schematically by the following structural formula:

HO - C - CH₂ ~ NH - CH₂ - P - OH

OH

<img file="IL79848A_D0001.tif" />

OH 0

HO - P - CH₂ - NH - CH₂ - C - OH

A similar structure is believed to prevail for the glyphosatechalcogen compound-sulfuric acid adduct in which the chalcogen atom of the chalcogen compound is associated with the acid sulfur atom. The mono-glyphosate adduct of sulfuric acid is presently believed to have a structure similar to that illustrated with only one glyphosate molecule being associated with each sulfuric acid molecule.

r P The optional chalcogen-containing compounds which also can be employed in these formulations have the empirical formula: p

X 11 R! - C - R₂ wherein X is oxygen or sulfur and R! and R₂ are independently selected from hydrogen, monovalent organic radicals, NR₃R₄ and NR₅, with at least one of R_x and R₂ being NR₃R₄ or NR₅. R₃ and R₄ are independently selected from hydrogen and monovalent organic radicals, and R₅ is a divalent organic radical. When R_x, R₂, R₃, and/or R₄ are monovalent organic radicals, such radicals can include, for instance, alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkenylaryl, aralkl, aralkenyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, or alkynyl, which can be substituted or unsubstituted with pendant functional groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, oxide, thio, thiol, or others, and they can contain heteroatoms such as oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen, or others. R₅ can be any divalent organic radical such as alkdyl, ardyl, alkendyl, alkyndyl, aralkdyl, aralkendyl, etc., which may contain pendant atoms or substituents and/or heteroatoms as described for R₃ and R₄. Preferably, R₃ and R₄are hydrogen or hydrocarbyl radicals which, in combination, contain about 10 carbon atoms or less, and X is preferably oxygen. Such substituents are presently preferred due to their relatively higher chemical stability. Particularly preferred chalcogen-containing compounds include urea, thiourea, formamide, and combinations of these.

Essentially any proportions of glyphosate and sulfuric acid can be employed, it being essential only that a sufficient quantity of each constituent is present to obtain a herbicidally effective amount of one or more of the glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products. It has been found that the glyphosate-sulfuric acid and glyphosatechalcogen compound-sulfuric acid reaction products are more soluble and more herbicidally active than glyphosate alone and that such adducts control a broader range of vegetation than does glyphosate or the organoamine glyphosate salts such as the isopropylamine salt. Accordingly, the compositions of this invention can contain only minor amounts of one or more of the described reaction products in the presence or absence of excess glyphosate or sulfuric acid. As a rule, however, a substantial proportion of the glyphosate and sulfuric acid is present as one or more of such reaction products. Accordingly, the glyphosate/I^SO^ molar ratio will usually be at least about 0.1, generally at least about 0.5. Compositions having glyphosate/H^SO^ molar ratios of 0.5 contain (or form upon evaporation of solvent from dilute solutions) 50 percent of the sulfuric acid as the mono-glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction product. The glyphosate/H₂SO₄ molar ratio is generally below about 10, usually below about 5 and preferably about 2 or less. Molar ratios of 2 connote the di-glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products. Most compositions will have glyphosate/H^SO^ molar ratios within the range of about 0.1 to about 10, preferably about 0.1 to about 2. The mono-glyphosate-sulfuric acid composition, e.g., the reaction product of one mole of each reactant, is presently preferred since it can be prepared, stored, shipped, and applied as a liquid and in the absence of any solvent. This product is a stable liquid and it contains 63.3 weight percent glyphosate and acid which correspond to a one. The di-glyphosate sula solid under ambient condishipped, and stored as such, to the extent of approxi2 4 acid reaction product is and can be manufactured,

36.7 weight percent sulfuric glyphosate/H,SO_z molar ratio of furic tions

It is soluble in water at_A(50^eF^ mately 60 weight percent and can also be manufactured, stored, and shipped in that form. Compositions which have glyphosate/H₂S0₄ molar ratios above 1 and below 2 connote those which contain a combination of the mono- and diglyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products. Reaction products which are presently preferred, particularly for manufacture and/or use as concentrates containing, for example, 5 weight percent or more of the combination of glyphosate and sulfuric acid, have glyphosate/H^SO^ molar ratios of about 1/3 to about 1/1. Within this molar ratio range, stable, noncorrosive liquid compositions and concentrated solutions can be obtained. When the glyphosate/I^SO^ molar ratio is increased much above 1/1 in concentrated liquids or solutions, a solid phase tends to precipitate. When the molar ratio is reduced much below 1/3 (i.e., 3 moles of sulfuric acid per mole of glyphosate), the combinations can become corrosive indicating that the oxidizing and dehydrating activities of sulfuric acid are not completely attenuated by glyphosate.

The novel compositions also include combinations which contain one of the described chalcogen compounds in addition to glyphosate and sulfuric acid. The presence of the chalcogen compound results in the formation of the glyphosate-chalcogen compound-sulfuric acid reaction product which contains one mole of each of the three constituents.

This three-component reaction product can be present in combination with the mono- and/or di-glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products depending upon the respective molar ratios of the three constituents. Very minor amounts of the chalcogen compound relative to glyphosate and sulfuric acid can be employed. However, when the chalcogen compound is employed, the chalcogen compound/HjSO^ molar ratio will usually be at least about 0.1, generally at least about 0.5, preferably about 0.5 to below 2, and most preferably about

1. Thus, the most preferred chalcogen compound-containing compositions are those which contain one mole of each of the three constituents: glyphosate, chalcogen compound, and sulfuric acid.

The presence of the mono- and or di-glyphosatesulfuric acid reaction products and of the glyphosatechalcogen compound-sulfuric acid reaction products has been established by several observations. For instance, glyphosate, which is soluble in water only to the extent of 1.2 weight percent at 25°C., dissolves in concentrated (100%) sulfuric acid to the extent of 63.3 weight percent. Even higher glyphosate concentrations can be achieved by formation of the di-glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction product. Secondly, dissolution of glyphosate in concentrated sulfuric acid produces a significant exotherm indicating that a reaction between glyphosate and sulfuric acid occurs. Furthermore, several of the characteristic chemical activities of sulfuric acid are largely attenuated or are not even evident when the acid is combined with glyphosate. The reaction products do not char cellulose or other materials which are normally attacked by concentrated sulfuric acid. Nevertheless, the sulfuric acid still exists as the acid and has not been neutralized, e.g., by conversion to a Bronsted salt, as evidenced by titration with standard base. The same is true of the chalcogen compound-containing compositions. Addition of one of the described chalcogen compounds to compositions containing glyphosate and sulfuric acid produces an exotherm characteristic of the reaction of urea with sulfuric acid which occurs in the formation of urea-sulfuric acid adducts as discussed in β U. S. Patent 4,445,925, Methods of

-15€

Producing Concentrated Urea-Sulfuric Acid Reaction Products, the disclosure of which 16 Incorporated herein in its entirety.

Several of the novel glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products, such as the di-glyphosate product, can be manufactured as solids, while all of the described reaction products can be manufactured and employed as pure liquids or solutions. For instance, the mono-glyphosate product (glyphosate/H^SO^ mole ratio of 1/1) is liquid under ambient conditions in the absence of any solvent, and is miscible in all proportions with water and other polar solvents.

The novel reaction products are usually applied to vegetation in liquid form, and such liquids contain herbicidally effective amounts of the glyphosate-acid reaction products. While these reaction products exhibit herbicidal activity at very minor concentrations and dosage rates, the glyphosate is usually present in the composition at a concentration of at least about 0.05 weight percent and preferably at least about 0.1 weight percent. Higher concentrations are usually preferred for manufacture, shipment, and storage. In such compositions, glyphosate concentration will be at least about 10 weight percent, generally, at least about 20 weight percent, preferably at least 30 weight percent, and can even exceed 50 weight percent. As disclosed herein, glyphosate concentrations as high as 63.3 weight percent can be achieved in the liquid compositions.

The novel liquid and solid compositions can contain one or more other materials which do not negate the herbicidal activity of the glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction product. Such additional materials typically include surfactants which facilitate foliage wetting and corrosion inhibitors such as those discussed in U. S. Patents 4,402,852, NON-CORROSIVE UREA-SULFURIC ACID COMPOSITIONS, and 4,404,116, NON-CORROSIVE UREA-SULFURIC ACID REACTION PRODUCTS, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

-16Glyphosate can be prepared by the reaction of glycine with chloroinethylphosphonic acid as described by J. E. Franz in U. S. Patent 3,799,756, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Alternative schemes for the manufacture of glyphosate are discussed and/or referenced by Grossbard et al., supra.

The active glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products can be prepared by adding sulfuric acid to dilute solutions of glyphosate (since glyphosate is not highly soluble) or adding glyphosate to either dilute or concentrated sulfuric acid. The reaction of glyphosate and sulfuric acid is highly exothermic. Thus, when concentrated combinations are produced, it is preferable to either cool the reactants or otherwise provide for heat dissipation. While glyphosate is thermally stable at temperatures of up to about 200° C., it is preferable to maintain much lower temperatures in the presence of strong acids, such as sulfuric acid. Thus, it is presently preferred to provide cooling adequate to assure that reaction temperature is maintained at about 70° C. or less, most preferably about 50°.C. or less in concentrated systems, e.g., systems in which the glyphosate and sulfuric acid, in combination, constitute at least about 20 weight percent of the combination, and particularly when they constitute more than 40 percent of the composition. Adequate cooling can be provided by ice baths, the use of pre-cooled reactants, the use of a heel of previously prepared material, recirculating cooling systems, gradual addition of glyphosate to the sulfuric acid, or any combination of these. Reaction temperature and reactant and product thermal stability are of less concern in more dilute systems, e.g. systems in which the glyphosate and sulfuric acid constitute less than 20 weight percent of the total composition. Thus, when glyphosate is added to a dilute, e.g. 5 to 10 weight percent, solution of sulfuric acid, gradual addition of glyphosate is usually sufficient to prevent excessive reaction phase temperatures,

-17Glyphosate-sulfuric acid compositions having glyphosate/H^SO^ molar ratios of about 1 can be prepared in liquid form at room temperature in the absence of any solvent. Compositions which contain substantial excesses of glyphosate, however, will precipitate or will not dissolve the di-glyphosate reaction product of sulfuric acid and/or excess glyphosate in the absence of diluents such as water or other polar solvents. In such instances, the di-glyphosate product, in the presence or absence of excess unreacted glyphosate, can be separated from the liquid phase and later dissolved in water or other solvent prior to application.

The novel glyphosate-chalcogen compound-sulfuric acid herbicides can be prepared by adding the chalcogen compound to preformed glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products, by the simultaneous or sequential addition of the chalcogen compound and glyphosate to sulfuric acid, the addition of sulfuric acid to solutions of the chalcogen compound and glyphosate, or by the addition of glyphosate to pre-formed chalcogen compound-sulfuric acid adducts. When pre-formed glyphosate-sulfuric acid reaction products or chalcogen compound-sulfuric acid reaction products are employed in such preparations, it is presently preferred, although not essential, that the pre-formed material have a glyphosate/H₂S0₄ or chalcogen compound/HjSO^ molar ratio below 2. This proviso will assure the availability of reactive sites on the sulfuric acid for reaction with the third component, e.g., either glyphosate or the chalcogen compound. Methods suitable for preparing urea-sulfuric acid adducts are discussed in U. S. Patent 4,445,925, supra, and adducts of the other chalcogen compounds described herein can be prepared by those methods.

Essentially all varieties of vegetation can be controlled by applying to the foliage a herbicidally effective amount of the glyphosate-sulfuric acid and/or glyphosate-chalcogen compound-sulfuric acid combinations. While

-18very minor dosage rates of the novel combinations deter plant growth, adequate control usually involves the application of sufficient herbicide to either eliminate undesired vegetation or deter its growth. Dosage rates required to accomplish these effects, of course, vary depending on plant type (due to variations in specific plant resistance) and plant size and maturity. More mature plants are generally more resistant to herbicides and require higher dosage rates for a comparable level of control. Useful dosage rates can best be expressed in relation to glyphosate dosage rates and will generally correspond to at least about 115 ml glyphosate per hectare (0.1 pints per acre) preferably at least about 235 ml per hectare (about 0.2 pints per acre). Dosage rates corresponding to glyphosate dosages of about 235 ml to about 23 litres per hectare (about 0.2 to about 20 pints per acre) are generally adequate to control most weeds and brush prevalent in field crop areas. The described glyphosate dosage rates correspond broadly to at least about 1.1, preferably at least about 2.2, and usually from about 2.2 to about 225 kg per hectare (at least about 1, preferably at least about 2, and usually from about 2 to about 200 pounds per acre) of the combination of glyphosate and sulfuric acid or glyphosate-chalcogen compound-sulfuric acid (on a solvent-free basis).

The described herbicides can be employed to effectively control both dry-land and aquatic vegetation including all varieties of grasses, broad leafs, and succulents ranging from crabgrass to all varieties of forest trees, including broad leafs and conifers. Illustrative of undesired vegetation typically controlled for dry-land agricultural purposes are: black mustard (brassica nigra), curly dock (rumex crispus), common groundsel (senecio vulgaris), pineapple weed (matricaria matricarioides), swamp smartweed (kelp) (polygonum coccineum), prickly lettus (lactuca scariola), lance-leaved groundcherry (physalis lanceifolia), annual sowthistle (sonchus oleraceus), london rocket (sisymbrium irio), common fiddleneck (amsinckia intermedia), hairy nightshade (solanum sarrachoides), shepherd’s purse (capsella bursa-pastoris), sunflower

־19־ (helianthus annus), common knotweed (polygonum aviculare), green amaranth (amaranthus hybridus), mare's tail (conyza canadensis), henbit (lamium amplexicaule), cocklebur (xanthium strumarium), cheeseweed (malva parviflora), lambsquarters (chenopodium album), puncture vine (tribulus terrestris), common purslane (portulaca oleracea), prostrate spurge (euphorbia supina), telegraph plant (heterotheca grandiflora), carpetweed (mollugo verticillate), yellow starthistle (centaurea solstitialis), milk thistle (silybum marianum), mayweed (anthemis cotula), burning nettle (urtica urens), fathen (atriplex patula), chickweed (stellaria media), scarlet pimpernel (anagallis arvensis), redroot pigweed (amaranthus retroflexus), minners lettuce (montia perfoliata), turkey mullein (eremocarpus setigerus), nettleleaf goosefoot (chenopodium murale), prostrate pigweed (amaranthus blitoides), silverleaf nightshade (solanum elaeagnifolium), hoary cress (cardaria draba), largeseed dodder (cuscuta indecora), California burclover (medicago polymorpha), horse purslane (trianthema portulacastrum), field bindweed (Iconvolvulus arvensis), Russian knapweed (centaurea repens), flax-leaved fleabane (conyza bonariensis), wild radish (raphanus sativus), tumble pigweed (amaranthus albus), stephanomeria (stephanomeria exigua), wild turnip (brassica campestris), buffalo goard (cucurbita foetidissima), common mullein (verbascum thapsus), dandelion (taraxacum officinale), Spanish thistle (xanthium spinosum), chicory (cichorium intybus), sweed anise (foeniculum vulgare), annual yellow sweetclover (melilotus indica), poison hemlock (conium maculatum), broadleaf filaree (erodium botrys), white stem filaree (erodium moschatum), redstem filaree (erodium cicutarium), ivyleaf morning-glory (ipomea hederacea), shortpod mustard (brassica geniculata), buckhorn plantain (plantago lacenolata), sticky chickweed (cerastium viscosum), himalaya blackberry (rubus procerus), purslane speedwell (veronica peregrine), mexicantea (chenopodium

-20ambrosioides), Spanish clover (lotus purshianus), australian brassbuttons (cotula australis), goldenrod (solidago callfornica), citron (citrullus lanatus), hedge mustard (sisyrobrlum orientale), black nightshade (solanum nodiflorum), Chinese thornapple (datura ferox), bristly oxtongue (picris echiodes), bull thistle (cirsium vulgare), spiny sowthistle (sonchus asper), tasmanian goosefoot (chenopodium pumilio), goosefoot (chenopodium botrys), wright groundcherry (physalls acutifolia), tomatillo groundcherry (physalis philadelphica), pretty spurge, (euphorbia peplus), bitter apple (cucumis myriocarpus), Indian tobacco (nicotiana bigelovii), common morning-glory (ipomoea purpurea), waterplantain (alisma triviale), smartweed (polygonum lapathifolium), mature sowthistle (sonchus asper), yellow nutsedge (cyperus esculentus), purple nutsedge (cyperus rotundus), lupine (lupinus formosus), and grasses of the family Gramineae such as annual rye grass, blue grass, water grass, barnyard grass, bermuda grass, fescue, mat grass, Johnson grass, and the like.

The invention is further described by the following examples which are illustrative of specific modes of practicing the invention and are not intended as limiting the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.

EXAMPLE 1

Four replicate test plots of 0.04 hectare (0.1 acre) each comprising mature populations of Pigweed, Sowthistle, Barnyard grass, jungle grass and Cheeseweed were treated with the glyphosate-isopropylamine salt (as Roundup^ ) applied at a rate of 4.7 litres per hectare (two quarts per acre) in a total spray volume of 470 litres per hectare (50 gallons per acre). All weed populations were mature and had an average plant height of approximately 300 mm (one foot). Three days after application, the extent of damage to all plants of each species in each replicate test plot was evaluated and rated on a scale of 1 to 10, 1 indicating no damage whatever and 10 j

indicating complete necrosis. These results are reported in column A under each respective weed species in Table 1.

Evaluation of weed control was repeated 5 days after appllcation using the same indexing system. These results are reported under column B for each weed species in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 2

The operation described in Example 1 was repeated on four replicate test plots in the same weed population with the exception that the glyphosate-isopropylamine salt was applied at a rate of 2.3 litres per hectare (one quart per acre). All other conditions remained the same. The results of this test are reported for each weed species in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 3

The operation described in Example 1 was repeated on four additional replicate test plots in the same weed population with the exception that the glyphosate-isopropylamine salt was appled at a rate corresponding to 585 ml per hectare (0.25 quart per acre) (as Roundup). All other conditions remained the same. The results for each weed species are reported in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 4

The operation described in Example 1 was repeated on four additional replicate test plots of the same weed population with the exception that the plants in these test plots were treated by foliar application of a glyphosate-sulfuric acid composition having a glyphosate/I^SO^ molar ratio of one. This composition was applied at a rate, based on equivalent glyphosate content, corresponding to 4.7 litres per hectare (two quarts per acre) of the glyphosate-isopropylamine salt. In other words, the quantity of glyphosate applied in this application was equivalent to the quantity of glyphosate existing In 1.9 litres (two quarts) of the glyphosate-isopropylamine salt (expressed as Roundup). This composition was diluted to a total spray volume of 470 litres per hectare (50 gallons per acre) prior to application. Damage to each weed species was evaluated as in Example 1, and those results are reported in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 5

The operation described in Example 4 was repeated with the exception that the glyphosate-sulfuric acid composition was applied to four additional replicate test plots in the same weed population at a dosage rate corresponding to

2.3 litres per hectare (one quart per acre) equivalent glyphosate-isopropylamine salt (based on glyphosate equivalent). Evaluation of weed damage was repeated as in Example 1, and the results are reported in Table 1.

EXAMPLE 6

The operation described in Example 4 was repeated on four additional test plots in the same weed population with the exception that the glyphosate-sulfuric acid composition was applied at a rate corresponding to 585 ml per hectare (0.25 quart per acre) equivalent glyphosate-isopropyl amine salt. All other conditions were the same as in Example 4, and evaluation of weed damage was repeated as in Example 1. Results of these evaluations are reported in Table 1.

TABLE 1

Degree of Control _{R t} (b) Barnyard Jungle

Pigweed Sowthistle Grass Grass Cheeseweed

L/ha qt./g AB AB A B A B A B

1. Glyphosate- &lt;1.7 2 7 10 4 7 9 10. 8 10 2 5 isopropyl-, . 2.3 1 71046 9 10 8 10 2 5 amine salt¹ 4 2 10 8 10 9 36 69 0.25 0.585 ׳

2. Glyphosate- 4.7 2 9 10 8 10 9 10 9 10 810

H_?SO״ reaction 2.3 1 9 10 8 9 9 10 9 10 710 product 0.585 0.25 6 6 3 5 7 8 7 8 55 (a) As Roundup .

(b) Rates for glyphosate-H^SO!! reaction product expressed as molar equivalent quantity of isopropylamine salt.

(c) 1 : no control. 10 : complete control. Column A evaluated 3 days after application; column B evaluated 5 days after application.

Comparison of the results of Examples 1 through 6 demonstrates that the glyphosate-sulfuric acid compositions of this invention achieved earlier control of all weed species then the glyphosate-isopropylamine salt (results of column A) with the exception of Barnyard Grass at the first date of evaluation. These results demonstrate that the glyphosate-sulfuric acid compositions provided better long term control of several weed species including Sowthistle and Cheeseweed and effected essentially equivalent control of Pigweed, Barnyard Grass and Jungle Grass.

EXAMPLE 7 p

Round-up and the 1/2 glyphosate/i^SO^ molar ratio reaction product were applied to separate test plots of mature winter weeds comprising mixed species of susceptible grasses and broadleafs as well as some broadleaf varieties generally more tolerant to Round-up. Round-up applications were made at rates of 585, 1170 and 1755 ml per hectare (8, 16, and 24 fluid ounces per acre) of a solution purchased as Round-up and formulated to contain 120 grams per litre (three pounds per gallon) equivalent glyphosate. Each dosage rate was applied at three different spray volumes — 94, 280 and 470 litres per hectare (10, 30 and 50 gallons per acre), and each test was replicated four times for a total of 36 trials. Each test plot was visually inspected 7, 15, and 25 days after spraying, and the results are reported in Table 2 following Example 8, infra.

Predominant grasses included ripgut brome (bromus rigidus), and wild barley (hordeum leporinum). Predominant broadleaf weeds were wild radish (raphanus sativus), mares tail (conyza canadensis), red stem filaree (erodium cicutarium), almond seedlings (prunus sp.), groundsel (senecio vulgaris), annual sowthistle (sonchos oleiaceus), chickweed (stellaria media), and fiddleneck (amsinckia intermedia). Minor broadleaf weeds were red maids (calandrinia ciliata) and wire weed (polygonum avlculare). The only significant perennial weed was bermuda grass (cynodon dactylon).

EXAMPLE 8

The field trial described in Example 7 was repeated with the exception that the herbicide applied was a glyphosate/sulfuric acid reaction product containing 2 moles of sulfuric acid per mole of glyphosate and sufficient water to obtain a composition containing 120 grams per litre (three pounds per gallon) equivalent glyphosate. As in Example 7, this material was applied at dosage rates of 585, 1170 and 1755 ml per hectare (8, 16 and 24 fluid ounces per acre), and each dosage rate was applied at spray volumes of 94, 280 and 470 litres per hectare (10, 30 and 50 gallons per acre). There were four replicates of each trial. Weed vigor ratings for the thirteen weed species grouped as grasses and broadleafs were evaluated 7» 15 and 25 days after spraying and these results are reported in Table 2.

TABLE 2

Weed Vigor Rating (a)

<td rowspan="2"> Herbicide</td><td rowspan="2"> ml/ha (oz./g)</td><td rowspan="2"> 1/ha (gal/j)</td><td colspan="3"> Grasses__</td><td colspan="3"> Broadleafs</td>

<td> da\</td><td> a- Pt» ---&gt;. -=: &lt;J1־ Co</td><td> 25</td><td> ?</td><td> da⁵_s</td><td> o- ί» ΓΟ u»</td>

<td> p Round-up</td><td> 585( 8)</td><td> 94(10)</td><td> 0</td><td> 6</td><td> 8</td><td> 0</td><td> 9</td><td> i|</td>

<td> S.A.G.(b)</td><td> 585( 8)</td><td> 911(10)</td><td> 0</td><td> 6</td><td> 7</td><td> 0</td><td> 5</td><td> 6</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 1170(16)</td><td> 94(10)</td><td> 0</td><td> 7</td><td> 8</td><td> 0</td><td> 5</td><td> 5</td>

<td> S.A.G.</td><td> 1170(16)</td><td> 94(10)</td><td> 0</td><td> 8 . </td><td> 9</td><td> 0</td><td> 7</td><td> 8</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 1755(24)</td><td> 94(10)</td><td> 3</td><td> 8</td><td> 9</td><td> 2</td><td> 7</td><td> 8</td>

<td> S.A.G.</td><td> 1755(24)</td><td> 94(10)</td><td> 2</td><td> 9</td><td> 10</td><td> 0</td><td> 9</td><td> 10</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 585( 8)</td><td> 280(30)</td><td> 0</td><td> 5</td><td> 6</td><td> 0</td><td> 3</td><td> 3</td>

<td> S.A.G.(b)</td><td> 585 (8)</td><td> 280(30)</td><td> 0</td><td> 7</td><td> 8</td><td> 0</td><td> 5</td><td> 7</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 1170(16)</td><td> 280(30)</td><td> 0</td><td> 6</td><td> 7</td><td> 0</td><td> 11</td><td> 9</td>

<td> S.A.G.</td><td> 1170(16)</td><td> 280(30)</td><td> 0</td><td> 8</td><td> 8</td><td> 0</td><td> 6</td><td> 7</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 1755(24)</td><td> 280(30)</td><td> 4</td><td> 8</td><td> 8</td><td> 3</td><td> 7</td><td> 7</td>

<td> S.A.G.</td><td> 1755(24)</td><td> 280(30)</td><td> 3</td><td> 9</td><td> 10</td><td> 2</td><td> 7</td><td> 9</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 585( 8)</td><td> 470(50)</td><td> 0</td><td> 3</td><td> 5</td><td> 0</td><td> 2</td><td> 3</td>

<td> S.A.G.(b)</td><td> 585( 8)</td><td> 470(50) '</td><td> 0</td><td> 6</td><td> 9</td><td> 0</td><td> 5</td><td> 7</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 1170(16)</td><td> 470(50)</td><td> 0</td><td> 6</td><td> 7</td><td> 0</td><td> 9</td><td> !1</td>

<td> S.A.G.</td><td> 1170(16)</td><td> 470(50)</td><td> 0</td><td> 8</td><td> 9</td><td> 0</td><td> 7</td><td> 8</td>

<td> Round-up</td><td> 1755(21!)</td><td> 470(50)</td><td> !1</td><td> 6</td><td> 8</td><td> 3</td><td> 5</td><td> 6</td>

<td> S.A.G.</td><td> 1755(24)</td><td> 470(50)</td><td> 2</td><td> 9</td><td> 10</td><td> 0</td><td> 8</td><td> 10</td>

(a) 0 : healthy plant; 10 : dead plant.

(b) S.A.G. = sulfuric acid/glyphosate reaction product, 2/1 molar.

ro

The results reported in Table 2 demonstrate that, with only two exceptions in which the herbicides were equivalent, the sulfuric acid-glyphosate reaction product was conslstently more effective than the glyphosate isopropylamine salt (Round-up ) at 15 and 25 days after application on both grasses and broadleafs at all dosage rates and spray volumes. The sulfuric acid-glyphosate reaction product exhibited equivalent herbicidal activity on both grasses and broadleafs at all dosage and spray volumes; the isopropylamine salt did not. The salt exhibited significantly less herbicidal activity on broadleafs than it did on grasses. The sulfuric acid-glyphosate reaction product also exhibited equivalent activity at all dilutions (spray volumes), while the isopropylamine salt did no,t. For instance, the activity of the sulfuric acid-glyphosate reaction product applied at 470 litres per hectare (50 gallons per acre) spray volume was equivalent, and possibly superior to, its activity at the lower spray volumes of 94 and 280 litres per hectare (10 and 30 gallons per acre). In contrast, the activity of the isopropylamine salt diminished markedly with dilution. Thus, the actitivity of the salt at 470 litres per hectare (50 gallons per acre) spray volume was consistently less than at 94 and 280 litres per hectare (10 and 30 gallons per acre) for both grasses and broadleaf weeds.

While particular embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be understood, of course, that the invention is not limited thereto since many obvious modifications can be made, and it is intended to include within this invention any such modifications as will fall within the scope of the appended claims. For instance, sulfuric acid reaction products with herbicidally active derivatives and homologs of glyphosate have physical and herbicidal properties similar to those exhibited by the described sulfuric acid-glyphosate reaction products, and such reaction products are intended to be included within the scope of this invention.