Concrete monocoque building construction
Abstract
This record has no abstract on file.
Term
No projected expiry on record.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Today
8 claims: 2 independent, 6 dependent
- 11 3 0 4 4 5 /2 WHATISCLAI IS:1., . A double monocoque concrete structure,, comprising: a core structure comprised of foam plastic presenting 15 opposite sides and arranged in a desired shape;a substantially continuous layer of concrete on each of the opposite sides of the core structure such that each layer constitutes a load bearing -. concrete shell thereby forming the double monocoque concrete s : structure. 20
- 544 . The double monocoque concrete structure according,to claim 43 , wherein the load bearing component comprises a wall of the building. 45 · The double monocoque concrete structure according to 10 claim 43 r wherein the load bearing component comprises a roof of the building.
Independent claims2
61 paragraphs in 2 sections, as filed
r 8236/99 Πϋΐη Ίϋΐιι ριρυιη Jion rn nun
CONCRETE MONOCOQUE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WO 98/27291 PCT/US9fi/20717/^
CONCRETE MONOCOQUE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 5
Background of the Invention
This invention relates to a technique for making a concrete monocoque shell house using foamed plastic interlocking and noninteriocking blocks to form the structure of a house on a concrete foundation which is then sprayed with a layer of concrete to form a monocoque shell 10 house structure.
In many poorer countries, housing is beyond the grasp of most people. To make housing more affordable in those countries, low cost house building techniques are required.
Many lower cost techniques for building homes have been developed. In one technique, a flexible membrane is erected over a framework. One or more layers of foam are then fonned 15 on the membrane to stiffen it and provide a substrate for carrying a heavier layer. The layer of foam is then sprayed with concrete to form the structural shell of foe building. The problem with this technique is it makes it difficult to do details. For example, to form openings to accommodate windows, the frame structure must be designed and built with such openings, and foe flexible membrane must be erected accordingly so as not to block foe opening. 20 Another technique uses stackable plastic blocks, much like cinder blocks, which are hollow in their center and have openings on their edges providing access to their hollow centers. Once stacked forming the building structure, these blocks are filled with concrete which forms the principal structure of the building. With this technique, details are also difficult to do. For example, after the blocks are in place, openings for accommodating windows cannot be formed 25 withohtfeananging the blocks. Furthermore, special blocks must be used around openings so that when filled with concrete, the concrete does not flow into foe opening.
Other techniques use blocks to form the substrate structure of a house to which is applied a fiber mesh. Cement or stucco is then sprayed on foe fiber mesh forming a cell structured house. To form details with this technique, such as window openings, foe openings must be 30 formed on the substrate, as well as on the fiber mesh. A common problem with all of these techniques is, that once foe underlying structure of the house is formed, the structure can not be easily modified. For example, extra openings for windows cannot be fonned without spending excessive amounts of time redesigning and rebuilding foe underlying structure. Such modifications can add significantly to foe cost of 35 building the house. Another problem with these techniques, is that they may not provide sufficient insulation. A low cost house is not very desirable, if foe costs associated with heating it are excessive. -1- WO 98/27291 PCT/US96/20717
Accordingly, there is a need for a technique for building low cost housing which allows details (e.g., cutaways and openings) to be easily incorporated with minimal or no increase in the house cost In addition, the technique must include steps for sufficiently insulating the house for minimizing the energy required to heat it
Summary of the Invention
The present invention relates to a low cost technique for forming an insulated monocoque concrete shell house. To form the house, a concrete foundation is formed having a ledge. The ledge spans the periphery of the foundation and defines the outer plan shape of the house. The external walls of the house are built against the ledge. The house structure is built on the foundation using foamed plastic interlocking and noninterlocking blocks in a fashion similar to that in which logs are used to build a log cabin. The walls of the house are built using blocks selected from a set comprising double lock, single lock, plain, hybrid, double rectangular peg and peg support blocks. Each wall interlocks with its adjacent walls.
The roof of the house is built using foamed plastic blocks which interconnect using a tongue and groove method. The roof is built from blocks selected from the group comprising of angle edge blocks, triangular blocks, curved rectangular and semirectangular blocks, and combinations thereof.
To interface the roof to the walls, interface plates are used selected from the group consisting of the interface-1, interface-2, interface-3 and interface-4 plates. Tie down rods embedded into the foundation may also be used to tie down the interface plates and the blocks forming the walls against the foundation.
Window and door openings can be manually cut with ease into the structure at the site. Electrical and plumbing hardware can also be easily embedded into the blocks through slits cut on the outer surface of the blocks.
The foamed plastic block built structure is then sprayed with concrete on its inner and/or outer surfaces as well as on the foundation adjacent to the walls of the structure, forming a monocoque shell structure. The concrete may also be applied by hand trowel. The concrete contains polymer adhesives to facilitate adhesion to the foamed plastic and the foundation, and also contains chopped fibers to increase the concrete flexural and impact strength as well as toughness, fatigue strength and resistance to cracking. Once set, the concrete forms the monocoque shell house structure, while the foamed plastic, with its excellent insulating characteristics is sandwiched within the concrete, insulating the monocoque structure.
Brief Description of the Drawings -2- WO 98/27291
PCT/US96/20717/X FIG. 1 isometrically depicts the mono-lock set of blocks comprising a plain, a single lock and a double lock block. 5 FIG. 2 isometrically depicts the mono-bond set of blocks comprising a hybrid, a double rectangular peg and a peg support block. FIG. 3 isometrically depicts the three sections, A, B and C which are used to form a mono-lock or a mono-bond block. FIG. 4 depicts end views of the interface-1, interface-2, interfece-3 and interface-4 plates, 10 as well as, top views of linear and comer interface-2 and interface-4 plates. FIG. 5 is an isometric view of an inverted V-shaped roof assembly. FIG. 6 is an isometric view of a semicircular roof assembly. FIG. 7 is a top and an end view of a concrete foundation having a square ledge. FIG. 8A depicts a cross sectional view of a wall having post tension tie downs. 15 FIG. 8B depicts a cross sectional view of a wall having tie down rods. FIG. 9 is an isometric view of the walls of a square house built on a concrete foundation using the mono-lock set of blocks. FIG. 10A is an elevation view of a partial single lock block interlocking with a half double lock or plain block forming the base level of a wall which interfaces with the foundation. 20 FIG. 10B is an elevation view of a partial single lock block interlocking with a foil single lock or double lock block forming the base level of a wall which interfaces with the foundation. FIG. 1OC is an elevation view of a partial peg support block engaging a half peg block forming the base level of a wall which interfaces with the foundation. FIG. 10D is an elevation view of a partial peg support block engaging a foil peg block a· 25 forming the base level of a wall which interfaces the foundation. FIG. 11 is an isometric view of the walls of a square house built on a concrete foundation using the mono-bond set of blocks. FIG. 12 is a top view of the foundation having notches and a side view of partial double lock and single lock blocks designed to engage the notched foundation. 30 FIG. 13 is a mean view of the partial double lock block engaging the notched foundation. FIG. 14 is an isometric view of a double inverted V-shaped roof supported by interface plates. FIG. 15 is an isometric view of two blocks having B sections interlocking with each other. 35 Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
This invention relates to a technique for making insulated low cost concrete shell monocoque structure houses. Foamed plastic blocks of different shapes are used to build the -3-
I
<img img-format="tif" img-content="drawing" file="IL130445AD00021.tif" id="idf0001" />
130445/3 structure of the house on a concrete foundation in a fashion similar to that in which logs are used to build a log cabin. Once formed, the inner and outer surfaces of the foamed plastic block 5 structure and part of the foundation are sprayed with concrete forming a monocoque concrete shell structure house.
The walls are typically fonned by using foamed plastic blocks having any of six different shapeg The six shapes of blocks are labelled for descriptive purposes as the double lock 10, the plain 12, the single lock 14, foe hybrid 16, foe double rectangular peg 18, and foe peg support 20 10 (also referred to as support) blocks (FIGS. 1 and 2). All blocks have foe same thickness for example 23 cm- These blocks can be easily manufactured at foe site using portable presses. In addition, when necessary they can be manually cut with ease to alter their shape to interface with foe other blocks or the foundation. They can easily be patched or fastened with glue, screws or pins. Furthermore, foe foamed plastic blocks serve as insulation material. 15 With foe exception offoe peg support blocks all blocks have foe same height Typical heights are in foe order of 60 cm. The peg support block has a height approximately twice foe height of foe other blocks. The blocks can have different lengths. The length, height or thicbie$s of foe blocks is not important in describing foe various embodiments of this invention. 20 Although foe blocks are continuous, they are fonned from a combination of any of three distinct shaped sections. For descriptive purposes, the three shaped sections are designated as A section 22, B section 24 and C section 30, respectively (HG. 3). A section 22, is a rectangle. B section 24, is a sideways "T" wherein the length of the base 26 of the "T" crossbar is equal to or slightly longer than foe thickness of foe block, and wherein foe length of foe "T" crossbar 28 25 is equal to the height of foe block The C section 30, is a rectangle having a height smaller than foe height offoe A rectangle and a lengthapproximately equal to half its thickness.
The double lock block 10 (FIG. 1) is composed of three sections, an A section with a B section cantilevered from each A section heightwise side. The longitudinal central axes of all three sections are aligned. The interface between the A and each B section forms an upper 30 notch 32 and a lower notch 34. Thus, the double lock block has four notches, two upper and two lower notches. The length of each notch is equal to foe length of a B section base leg and, therefore, as discussed above is equal to or slightly longer than foe thickness of foe block.
These notches allow for foe interlocking of the blocks. Each block that has a B section can interlock with another block that has a B section. For example, two double lock blocks can 35 interlock with each other. To interlock the blocks, one block is positioned perpendicularly over foe other so that a lower notch of foe upper block slides over a portion of foe B section base leg 26 of foe lower block. At the same time, foe upper notch of the lower block will slide over -4- WO 98/27291 PCT/US96/20717 a portion of the upper block's B section base leg. When this occurs, the two blocks are interlocked together, as shown in FIG. 15.
The plain block 12 (FIG. 1) is a rectangular shaped block. It is comprised only of an A section. The single lock block 14 (FIG. I) comprises an A section with a B section cantilevered from an A section heightwise side. In essence, it is like a double lock block but comprising only one B section.
The hybrid block 16 (FIG. 2) is composed of three sections, an A section with a B section and a C section each cantilevered from the A section opposite heightwise sides. All three sections are aligned along their central longitudinal axes. The C section forms a rectangular peg 36 extending beyond the rectangular A section.
The double rectangular peg block 18 (FIG. 2) is comprised of an A section with a C section cantilevered from each A section heightwise side. Again, all sections are aligned along their central longitudinal axes.
The peg support block 20 (FIG. 2) is composed of four B sections. Each B section base leg end is abutted to another section's base leg end forming a block which is symmetrical about its longitudinal (horizontal) central axis and about its vertical central axis. In turn, the block has a notch on its upper end 33, a notch on its lower end 35 and an opening 37 at its center which is shaped to match the cross sectional shape of the rectangular pegs (C sections) of either the hybrid or the double rectangular peg blocks. When two support blocks are positioned directly on top of each other, the lower notch of the upper support block and the upper notch of the lower support block also form an opening matched to the pegs. The peg support block is designed for supporting the rectangular peg portions (C sections) of the hybrid and double rectangular peg blocks Vqferred herein as the "peg blocks").
Tb provide support, a support block is placed perpendicularly to a peg block. The peg 36 of the first peg block is inserted into a notch 33,35 or opening 37 of the support block until the peg block's A section abuts against the support block. When this occurs, the peg penetrates half of the thickness of the support block. A second peg block peg is inserted into the notch or opening of the support peg block from the side opposite the first peg block until the second peg block's A section abuts against the support block and its peg abuts against the first peg block peg. These six shapes of blocks are the blocks of choice for building the walls of a house. Preferably, however, the walls are built using blocks selected from a set comprising only the double lock, plain or single lock blocks or selected from a set comprising only the hybrid, double rectangular peg and peg support blocks. For descriptive purposes, the former set of blocks is referred to as the mono-lock set and the latter set is referred to as the mono-bond set Accordingly, walls -5- WO 98/27291 PCT/US96Z20717/2 formed with the mono-lock set of blocks are referred to as mono-lock walls, while walls formed with the mono-bond set of blocks are referred to as mono-bond walls.
Interface plates, preferably made of foamed plastic, are used to provide a means for attaching the roof to the walls. These plates have specialized cross sectional shapes and may have lengths which span the length of a wall. They allow for roof support, as well as, provide water gutter to control rain water flowing down from the roof. These interface plates may have any of four preferred cross sectional shapes designated as interface-1, 40; interface-2, 42; interface-3,44; or interface-4,46 (FIG. 4).
All four interface plates have rectangular cross sectional shapes. The interface-1 plate has a lower notch 48 and upper notch 50 aligned about a vertical axis. The upper notch (referred herein as the "roof notch") is designed to engage the roof. The lower. notch (referred herein as the "wall notch") is designed to be slid over and engage the wall. Furthermore, a rounded notch 52 on the upper surface serves as the gutter. Along the length of the interface plates, the roof notch forms a roof groove 54, the wall notch forms a wall groove 55 and the gutter notches form the gutter 56.
The interface-2 plate has the same cross section as the interface-1 plate and further includes a smaller notch 58 on its upper surface opposite the gutter notch on the other side of the roof notch. This small notch (referred herein as the "light notch") is designe4 to form a light groove 60 to accommodate an electric light source such as a fluorescent light bulb.
The interface-3 and interface-4 plates are used in situations where two roof sections must be interfaced with a single wall. The interface-3 plate has a rectangular cross sections with two roof notches 50 on its upper surface symmetrically located about the block central vertical axis. On thifripper surface about the central vertical axis is a gutter notch. On the lower surface also about the central vertical axis is the wall notch 48. The interface-4 plate has the same cross section as the interface-3 plate with two additional light notches 58 each located on either side of each roof notch proximate the block edges. In an alternate embodiment, the interface plates do not incorporate gutter notches or gutters.
For descriptive purposes, the interface plates used along the length of the walls are referred to as the linear interface plates 62, 162. To accommodate the comers (wall intersections), the interface plates can have any of the above described cross section on at least three adjacent edges forming grooves along their length, as well as along their width. These interface plates are referred to as the comer interface plates 64,164.
The roof sections are preferably either of two shapes, inverted V-shaped 70 (FIG. 5) or semicyiindrical shaped 72 (FIG. 6). An inverted V-shaped roof is formed by rectangular shaped blocks 74 having angled edges 76. Each angled edge has either a tongue 78 or a groove 80 such -6- W0 98/27291 PCT/US96/20717/? that the tongue of one block's edge can connect with the groove of another block's edge to form the inverted V-shape. A semicyiindrical shaped roof is formed by curved rectangular blocks having a groove 84 along one of their longitudinal edges and a tongue 86 on the other such that the tongue of one block can engage the groove of another block allowing multiple curved blocks to be connected to form the semicyiindrical roof 72.
In an alternate embodiment, the semicyiindrical roof can be formed from a single semicyiindrical piece. In another embodiment, the roof may be quarter round rather than half round.
To close the ends of an. inverted V-shaped roo£ triangular blocks 88 (FIG. 5) may be used. In a similar fashion, semicircular blocks 90 (FIG. 6) rosy be used to close the ends of a semicyiindrical roof Quarter circular blocks may be used to close the aids of quarter round roofs.
To build the structure of the house using the foamed plastic blocks, a foundation 92 is formed with a ledge 94 proximate its periphery (FIG. 7). In essence, the ledge creates a "step" in the foundation, where the thickness of the foundation is stepped up forming a thicker section 96 bordered by a thinner peripheral section 98. The peripheral ledge defines the plan outer shape of the house. In an alternate embodiment, a foundation without a stepped ledge is formed.
Threaded galvanized tie down rods 100 (FIGS. 8A and 8B) are built into the foundation peripheral thinner section at a distance from the ledge approximately equal to half the thickness of the blocks. These threaded rods are built into the foundation at intervals around the foundation perimeter. As the house structure is built using the foamed plastic blocks, holes 107 are drifted vertically (heightwise) through the thickness of the blocks to allow for penetration of the threaded rods.
Various embodiments of the present invention are described herein relating to the building of a square house. However, as it will be obvious to one skilled in the ait, the embodiments are applicable to any shape house having perpendicular walls.
To build a mono-lock wall square house, a foundation 92 is first laid with a ledge 94 forming a square (FIG. 9). A double lock block 110 is cut in half along its longitudinal axis. Half of this block having its notches on its upper edge is placed heightwise against the ledge such that one of its B sections protrudes beyond the ledge. Next the nonprotruding B section ofthe block is perpendicularly engaged by the B section of a full single lock block 114 interlocking the two blocks. In order to accomplish this and to prevent interference with the ledge, the Iowa half of the "T" crossbar of the B section of the single lock block is cut away (FIG. 10A). When interlocked, the two blocks provide support to each otha. -7- WO 98/27291 PCT/US96/20717/2
Next, a plain block is cut along its longitudinal central axis. A half plain block 112 is then abutted against the half double lock block and the ledge. Finally, half of a single lock block 115 is abutted against the half plain block and the ledge so that its notch is on its upper edge. The blocks have lengths such that when all three pieces are set against the ledge, the B sections 24 of the double and single lock blocks protrude beyond their respective side the ledge. These three blocks form the base level of the first wall 410. The base level of the second wall 420, which is parallel to the first wall, is fonned using the same set of half blocks, but in reverse order.
The base of the third wall 430 which is perpendicular to the first and second walls, is built using a full double lock 210, a full plain 212, a full single lock 215 and a half single lock block 214. The first three of these blocks are set against the ledge of the foundation such that the full double lock block of the third wall interlocks with the split single lock block of the first wall and the full single lock block of the third wall interlocks the split double lock end block of the second wall. The half single lock block 214 is positioned perpendicularly and slid under the B section of the double lock block interlocking with the full double lock block (FIG. 10B). The base level of the fourth wall 440, which is parallel to the third wall, is built in the same manner as the third wall but with the reverse sequence of blocks.
Next, full blocks are used to build the next level of the first and second walls but in reverse sequence from that of their corresponding base level. The same approach is followed with the third and fourth walls. Once, the walls are built to a sufficient height, the last levels 450 of the third and fourth wall will have to be built using half blocks such that the height of all four walls is equal.
The interlocking between the blocks provides lateral support to the walls. Further support is pnMdfd by staggering the sequence of the types of blocks used within a wall.
It should be noted that the walls can also be built using a different combination of the mono-lock blocks. For example, each wall level can comprise two longer double lock blocks and two single lock blocks to interlock with the double lock blocks.
In an alternate embodiment, the same square house can be built using the mono-bond set of blocks which include the hybrid, double rectangular peg, and peg support blocks. To build the base level of the first wall, half hybrid and double rectangular peg blocks split along their central longitudinal axes are used. The peg support blocks 120,121 have the lower half of one of their lower B section's "Τ’ crossbar removed. This allows them to be positioned perpendicularly to the foundation thinner section and form a lower notch 134 with foe ledge 34 (FIG. 10C).
The first block of the base level of the first wall 510 is formed using a half hybrid block 116 resting heightwise against the foundation ledge with its B section protruding beyond -8· WO 9807291 PCT/US96/20717 the ledge (FIG. 11). A first peg support 120 block with its removed lower portion is positioned perpendicularly to the hybrid block and against the ledge such that the half hybrid block's peg 5 (C section 136) penetrates the bottom notch 134 of the peg support block formed by the ledge (HG. IOC). A half double rectangular peg block 118 is then positioned against the ledge with one of its peg’s penetrating the first peg support block from the side opposite and abutting the hybrid block. A second full peg support block 121 is mated perpendicularly to the other peg of the double rectangular peg block in the same way as was the first support block 120. Finally, 10 another half hybrid 117 is fitted with its peg penetrating and abutting the second peg support block and abutting the peg of the double peg block. The lengths of the blocks are chosen such the B section 24 of the second hybrid also protrudes beyond the ledge (FIG. 11). Note that multiple double square peg blocks of shorter length with additional support peg blocks can be also be used. 15 The same procedure is followed in building the base of the second wall 520. The third wall is formed using full hybrid and double rectangular peg blocks. The peg support blocks 220, 221, however must have a portion of their lower sections removed so that they may rest flat against the foundation while providing support to the peg blocks (FIG. 10D). The protruding B sections 24 of the hybrid blocks forming the third wall interlock with the protruding 20 B sections 24 of die hybrid blocks used in the first and second walls. This interlocking provides wall lateral support Further support is provided by the peg support blocks. The same procedure is followed in building the fourth wall 540. The remainder levels of the walls are built using full blocks. However, as with the previous embodiment the last level of blocks 550 forming the third and fourth walls must be split in half to maintain the same height with the first and second 25 walls. A* further alternate embodiment also uses mono-lock blocks. However, the foundation does not have a ledge, but rather has notches 330 around its perimeter (FIG. 12). The difference between this embodiment and the other mono-lock block embodiment is that the base of the walls are built with full and partially split double lock blocks 310 and single lock blocks 314. 30 The split blocks have half of their lower A sections as well as half of their B sections' base legs removed. The base of these blocks are positioned with their lower edges 325 fiat on the foundation with their B sections' 'Τ' crossbars 328 engaging and interlocking with the foundation notches 330 (FIG. 13). At the same time the notches on their upper surfaces provide a basis for interlocking with the other blocks of the set. 35 The next steps with all three embodiments are selecting the use of the roof interface or . interface plates and choosing the proper roof. Since each wall will be supporting a single roof, interiace-2 interface plates 42 (FIG. 4) will be used. (A interface-1 type of block can also be -9- WO 98/27291 PCT/US96/20717 used). The interface-2 plates engage the walls with their wall groove 55 (FIG. 5). Depending on the length ofthe walls, single or multiple interface-2 plates 62 may be used to span the length of each wall. When positioned on the walls, the rounded gutter groove 52 is placed external of the house wall, while the light groove is placed internal to the house walls 58 (FIG. 5). Comer interface-2 plates, 64, having grooves spanning their length, as well as, half of their width are fitted on the walls forming the comers (FIG. 14). These plates have their grooves spanning their length and at least half of their width.
Openings 351 are drilled vertically through the roof grooves of the interface plates to allow the threaded tie down rods to protrude through them (FIG. 8B). Once the interface plates are in place, a rebar rod 353 is routed in the lower portion of the upper roof groove 50 and is perpendicularly coupled 354 to the tie down rods. Then, the lower portion of the roof notch is filled with concrete covering the rebar and forming a concrete collar beam 355.
Once the concrete sets, nuts 354 are threaded on the protruding galvanized rods. As the nuts thread on the galvanized rods they force the interface plates against the wall blocks tying them down against the foundation. In an alternate embodiment, two sets of galvanized threaded rods are used to form post tension tie downs. Each post tension tie down is formed using two rods, one from each set, having opposite threads. Rods 100 from the first set are built into the foundation in the same fashion as with the previous embodiment. The first set rods are shorter such that they penetrate a portion of the wall height through vertically aligned holes 107 which are drilled in the wall blocks. As described earlier, these holes span the height of the wall as well as penetrate through the interface plate roof groove. Each rod from the second set has a stop, such as a nut 354, threaded on one end. The rods 101 from the second set are installed through-ftie wall holes in the roof groove and subsequent lower blocks. As with the previous embodiment, a rebar 353 is routed in the lower portion of the roof groove and is perpendicularly coupled to the rods proximate the stops. A concrete collar beam 355 is then formed on the lower portion of the roof groove encasing the rebar 353 and abutting the lower surface of the stops 359.
Once all rods are installed, a rod from the first set is aligned with a rod from the second set However, the lengths of the rods are such that a gap 360 exists between each pair of aligned rods. A tumbuckle 362 having threads at each end is used to engage the free ends of each pair of threaded rods. The internal threads on one end of the tumbuckle are opposite of the internal threads on the other end. The threads on one end are matched to the threads on the first set of rods, and the threads on the other end are matched to the treads on the second set or rods. Thus, as the tumbuckle is rotated in one direction it threads on the pair of rods forcing them toward each other such that the stop on each second set rod engages the concrete collar beam in the roof -10- WO 9807291 PCT/US96/20717/J2 groove foyeing the interface plates against die wall blocks and the foundation, generating a compressive force within the blocks tying them down against the foundation.
In an alternate embodiment which does not use tie down rods, the base level wall blocks are bonded to the fonndatinn A further embodiment incorporates tie downs, as well as, bonding of the base level blocks to the foundation.
Next the roof is installed. For illustrative purposes, an inverted V-shaped roof will be described having two inclined sides forming the inverted V and two triangular vertical sides 88 to close the roof (FIGS. 5 and 14). The inclined sides are formed by multiple sets of angle edged blocks 74 which interlock with each other using a tongue groove type of connection. The edges of the angle edged blocks are angled so that when the groove of one block is mated with the tongue of another, the edges of the two blocks form a vertical interface 375. The angles of the edges of the blocks and the block lengths are chosen such that when the blocks are mated their opposite edges are spaced so as to engage the interface plate roof grooves 50. The angled edged blocks are connected at one end forming the inverted V-shaped roof and are positioned to engage the roof grooves of the interface plates of the first and second walls with their other ends. To do so, the edges are cut or shaved about a vertical plane 377 (FIGS. 5 and 8B). This allows them to slide into the vertical walled roof groove 50. The edges of the roof rest against foe concrete collar beam 355 within foe roof groove. Openings 380 may have to be drilled at foe edges to accommodate foe protruding tie down rods, if necessary. Once foe V-shaped is in position, foe base edge of foe triangular shaped block 88 is slid into foe roof groove of foe third wall interface plates. The same is done with foe fourth wall. These triangular blocks can themselves be formed by multiple blocks which when abutted to together form a triangular shaped bfoek. These blocks are mated to foe inverted V-shaped roof edge surfaces 75, closing the roof, as shown in FIG. 14. If a semicyiindrical roof is used, then semicircular blocks 90 instead of triangular are used, as shown in FIG. 6.
When the roof is in place, small openings 382 are drilled on the roof outer surfaces proximate the interface plates. These openings provide a path from foe outer roof to foe concrete collar beam within foe roof groove of foe interface plate. Concrete is then sprayed through those openings bonding foe roof to foe concrete collar beam.
Once the structure of foe house is built using foe foamed plastic blocks, windows and doors are cut out from foe foamed plastic. Electrical and plumbing hardware can now be embedded into foe blocks by making cutouts in their outer surfaces. Next, the foamed plastic block structure is sprayed with concrete on its inner and outer surfaces. The horizontal surfaces proximate the walls are also sprayed forming a continuous layer with foe layer sprayed on foe walls. Single or multiple layers can be sprayed. It is preferable, however, to spray multiple thin -11- PCT/US96/20717 WO 9807291 layers of concrete wherein each layer is allowed to partly set prior to the application of the next layer to minimise slump. A typical thin layer has a thickness of approximately 8.0 mm. In an alternate embodiment, the concrete layers are applied using a trowel.
The sprayed concrete contains a polymer which acts as an adhesive to aid in the adhesion of the concrete against the foamed plastic blocks and also contains chopped fibers to keep the concrete coherent The adhesive character of the polymer also helps to minimize slump.
Preferably polymer-portland cement concrete, also called polymer modified concrete, is used. This is basically normal portland cement concrete to which a polymer or monomer has been added during mixing.
The chopped fibers are added to the concrete during mixing. The fibers, can be made from steel, plastic, glass and natural (cellulose) and other materials, and are available in a variety of shapes (round, flat, crimped, and deformed) and sizes.with typical lengths of 1.0 - 8.0 cm and thicknesses ranging from 0.005 - 0.75 mm. Steel fibers have been shown to significantly improve concrete flectural strength, impact strength, toughness, fatigue strength and resistance to cracking.
The aggregate in the concrete is sand without coarse gravel. Thermoplastic and elastomeric latexes can be used. Epoxies and other polymers can also used. In general, latex improves ductility, durability, adhesive properties, resistance to chlorideion ingress, shear bond, and tensible and flectural strength of concrete and mortar. Latex modified concrete (LMC) can also be used. LMC also has excellent freeze-thaw, abrasion, and impact resistance. Some LMC materials can also resist certain acids, alkalies, and organic solvents.
Once the concrete sets, a concrete monocoque structure is fonned. Lighting 384 can then be add&amp; jn the light grooves 58 of the interface plates (FIGS. 8 A and 8B).
Note that a square house with no inner walls and a single roof was described herein only by way of example. The present technique can be used to build other shapes of houses with or without inner walls. If a house, for example, has an inner wall, two roofs can be used as shown in FIG. 14. In this situation the inner walls will be fitted with either the interface-3 or interface-4 interface plates 162 which have two roof grooves. Each groove will engage and support one end of each of the roofs with the other end being supported by the outer walls. Furthermore, flat or other shaped roofs can also be used. These roofs can be single block or multiple block fonned roofs.
Only a few of the preferred embodiments have been described herein. People skilled in the art and technologies to which this invention pertains will appreciate the alternatives and changes in the described invention without meaningfully departing from the principle, spirit or scope of the invention. For example, other shapes of interlocking blocks can also be used. -12- WO 9807291 PCT/US96/20717
For instance, blocks having rounded or other shape notches, instead of rectangular notches, can also be used. 5 In other embodiments, some of the walls may be built using prefabricated foamed plastic panels rather than blocks. Concrete is then sprayed or otherwise applied to the panels and/or blocks. Some of these prefabricated panels may have a layer of concrete pre-applied on their outer surfaces. When using such panels only one layer of concrete may have to be sprayed or otherwise applied on their outer surfaces. 10 15 20 25 30 35 -13-
Contents2
37 members in 23 offices
Priority claims12
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 57075495 | United States of America | A | |
| 57075495 | United States of America | A | |
| 96180545 | China | A | |
| 96180545 | China | A | |
| 9620717 | United States of America | W | |
| 9620717 | United States of America | W | |
| 9900134 | African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) | A | |
| 9900134 | African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) | A | |
| CN1996180545 | – | – | – |
| OA19999900134 | – | – | – |
| US19950570754 | – | – | – |
| WO1996US20717 | – | – | – |
Members37
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MA24033A1 | Morocco | A1 | |
| ZA9610371B | South Africa | B | |
| TW311157B | Taiwan Province of China | B | |
| CA2275208A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| WO9827291A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| US5771649A | United States of America | A | |
| AU1353097A | Australia | A | |
| WO9913175A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| AU9388998A | Australia | A | |
| AP9901577A0 | African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) | A0 | |
| CN1239528A | China | A | |
| EG20722A | Egypt | A | |
| EP0966577A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| BR9612807A | Brazil | A | |
| EA199900558A1 | Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) | A1 | |
| IL130445A0 | Israel | A0 | |
| IL130445D0 | Israel | D0 | |
| EA000927B1 | Eurasian Patent Organization (EAPO) | B1 | |
| US6112489A | United States of America | A | |
| SI20283A | Slovenia | A | |
| EP0966577A4 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A4 | |
| JP2001506717A | Japan | A | |
| AU737448B2 | Australia | B2 | |
| CR5451A | Costa Rica | A | |
| TR1999001422T2 | Türkiye | T2 | |
| TR199901422T2 | Türkiye | T2 | |
| NZ503898A | New Zealand | A | |
| OA11131A | African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) | A | |
| AP1194A | African Regional Intellectual Property Organization (ARIPO) | A | |
| IL130445AThis record | Israel | A | |
| EP0966577B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT269458T | Austria | T | |
| ATE269458T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE69632747D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| ES2222486T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| DE69632747T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| CN1230595C | China | C |
3 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Patent not in force due to non-payment of renewal feesMM9K | MM9K | |
| Patent renewedKB | KB | |
| Patent grantedGrantedFF | FF |
Numbers
- Publication, DOCDB
- 130445
- Publication, EPODOC
- IL130445
- Application
- 13044596
- Application, DOCDB
- 13044596
- Application, EPODOC
- IL19960130445
Titles
- English
- CONCRETE MONOCOQUE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Classification
- CPC, 10
- E04B2/847
- E04B1/16
- E04B1/3205
- E04B2/84
- E04B2001/3217
- E04B2001/3264
- E04B2001/3276
- E04B2002/0206
- E04B2002/0265
- E04C1/40
- IPC, 6
- E04B1 16
- E04B1 28
- E04B2 02
- E04B1 32
- E04B2 84
- E04C1 40