Acoustic feedback event monitoring system for hearing assistance device

RELATED APPLICATION

0001This application is related to <patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="US27679506A"><text>U.S. patent application serial no. 11/276,795, filed March 14, 2006</text></patcit>, which is also published as <patcit id="pcit0002" dnum="US20070217620A"><text>U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0217620 on Sep. 20, 2007</text></patcit>, and titled: "SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING HEARING ASSISTANCE DEVICE SETTINGS USING DETECTED SOUND ENVIRONMENT," which documents are all incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

0002The present subject matter relates generally to hearing assistance devices, including, but not limited to hearing aids, and in particular to an acoustic feedback event monitoring system for hearing assistance devices.

BACKGROUND

0003Modem hearing assistance devices typically include digital electronics to enhance the wearer's experience. In the specific case of hearing aids, current designs employ digital signal processors rich in features. Modem hearing aids include acoustic feedback cancellation functions. Acoustic feedback cancellation provides very rapid correction of the response of the hearing aid to avoid acoustic feedback. It is difficult to adjust settings of an acoustic feedback cancellation system because they are not limited to electronic or software aspects. These settings are also a function of the acoustics of the environment experienced by the wearer of the device and the fit of the device for the particular wearer.

0004With the increase of the use of open fit configuration hearing assistance devices, such as receiver-in-the-canal (RIC) or receiver-in-the-ear (RITE) hearing aids, there is an increasing need for higher gain solutions and thus more attention is placed squarely on the acoustic feedback cancellation function. It is important to obtain as much information about the acoustic feedback experienced by the wearer and the operation of the acoustic feedback canceller to provide the desired higher gains with reduced feedback problems for hearing aid wearers.

0005Audiologists have struggled with lack of information regarding feedback problems that the wearer experienced in use of the hearing aids. Information such as the band at which feedback happens or the severity of the problem is not easy to get from the hearing aid wearer. This may lead to unnecessary reduction in gain at places where feedback is not of a problem resulting in reduced audibility and an unhappy customer.

0006The options available currently in the market for audiologists are limited. Information that is currently available for an audiologist is typically limited to patient's feedback condition while in the audiologist office. This information is limited and time consuming to acquire.

0007What is needed in the art is a system for improved monitoring of acoustic feedback events for hearing assistance devices. The system should provide robust and easily accessible information to allow for improved adjustment of hearing assistance devices.

SUMMARY

0008Disclosed herein, among other things, are methods and apparatus for hearing assistance devices, including, but not limited to hearing aids, and in particular to an acoustic feedback event monitoring system for hearing assistance devices.

0009The present disclosure relates to tracking of acoustic feedback events of a hearing assistance device, such as a hearing aid. Information about the acoustic feedback events is stored for analysis. Such information is useful for programming acoustic feedback cancellers and other parameters of a hearing assistance device.

0010In various embodiments, the present subject matter provides apparatus for storing information relating to acoustic feedback events of a hearing assistance device, including a microphone; a receiver; a digital signal processor adapted to process an input signal and generate an output signal, the digital signal processor adapted to perform a process to reduce acoustic feedback between the receiver and the microphone, the digital signal processor further adapted to store information relating to the acoustic feedback events over an extended period of use of the hearing assistance device, wherein the information is accessible for analysis to determine aspects of the acoustic feedback experienced by the hearing assistance device over the extended period of use, the extended period of use including different acoustic environments experienced by a wearer of the hearing assistance device during use of the hearing assistance device. Various embodiments provide multiband or subband approaches. Various embodiments provide storage on the hearing assistance device and remote from the hearing assistance device. Various embodiments store information including one or more of a total number of occurrences of a feedback event, a severity of a feedback event, or a number of feedback events per unit time. Various embodiments include but are not limited to different types of hearing aids, such as behind-the-ear, in-the-ear, and receiver-in-the-canal hearing aids. In various embodiments, wireless communications are provided to perform storage and/or transfer of the information.

0011Various embodiments provide methods for monitoring performance of a hearing assistance device having an acoustic feedback canceller, the methods including tracking information about a plurality of acoustic feedback events over an extended time interval of use of the hearing assistance device to monitor performance of the acoustic feedback canceller in different acoustic environments experienced by a wearer of the hearing assistance device; and storing the information for analysis. Various embodiments provide multiband or subband approaches. Various embodiments provide storage on the hearing assistance device and remote from the hearing assistance device. Various embodiments store information including one or more of a total number of occurrences of a feedback event, a severity of a feedback event, or a number of feedback events per unit time. Various embodiments include but are not limited to different types of hearing aids, such as behind-the-ear, in-the-ear, and receiver-in-the-canal hearing aids. In various embodiments, wireless communications are provided to perform storage and/or transfer of the information.

0012This Summary is an overview of some of the teachings of the present application and not intended to be an exclusive or exhaustive treatment of the present subject matter. Further details about the present subject matter are found in the detailed description and appended claims. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

0013<figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> is a block diagram showing hearing assistance devices and programming equipment, according to one embodiment of the present subject matter.

0014<figref idref="f0002">FIG. 2</figref> demonstrates one type of output possible with the present system, according to one embodiment of the present subject matter.

0015<figref idref="f0003">FIG. 3</figref> shows a functional block diagram of a hearing assistance system according to one embodiment of the present invention and a representation of an acoustic feedback path.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

0016The following detailed description of the present subject matter refers to subject matter in the accompanying drawings which show, by way of illustration, specific aspects and embodiments in which the present subject matter may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the present subject matter. References to "an", "one", or "various" embodiments in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references contemplate more than one embodiment. The following detailed description is demonstrative and not to be taken in a limiting sense. The scope of the present subject matter is defined by the appended claims, along with the full scope of legal equivalents to which such claims are entitled.

0017The present subject matter relates generally to hearing assistance devices, including, but not limited to hearing aids, and in particular to an acoustic feedback event monitoring system for hearing assistance devices.

0018<figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> is a block diagram of a system 11 showing a pair of hearing assistance devices and programming equipment, according to one embodiment of the present subject matter. <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> shows a host computer 10 in communication with the hearing assistance devices 20. In one application, the hearing assistance devices 20 are hearing aids. Other hearing assistance devices and types of hearing aids are possible without departing from the scope of the present subject matter. In various embodiments a programmer 30 is used to communicate with the hearing assistance devices 20; however, it is understood that the programmer functions may be embodied in the host computer 10 and/or in the hearing assistance devices 20 (e.g., hearing aids), in various embodiments. Programmer 30 thus functions to at least facilitate communications between the host computer 10 and the hearing assistance devices 20 (e.g., hearing aids), and may contain additional functionality and programming in various embodiments.

0019The present subject matter provides a means for tracking acoustic feedback events over an extended period of time. The tracking algorithm executes on each hearing aid to be monitored. In various embodiments, the tracking algorithm is performed by the digital signal processor to save acoustic feedback events for analysis. In various embodiments, it is possible that the tracking algorithm can operate at least in part on another device, including, but not limited to, the host computer 10, the programmer 30, another hearing aid 20, or on combinations of the foregoing. It is possible that the tracking algorithm can be executed on another device provided it accesses or obtains information about the feedback event experienced and/or operation of the feedback canceller as it operates on the hearing assistance device.

0020A good feedback detector in a multiband device can detect accurately the occurrence of feedback in a particular band. A hearing aid that has stored these feedback events is a good source of information for audiologists during follow up visits from hearing aid users. It is understood that such follow ups need not be in person and that using remote access technology, the feedback event data can be reviewed and processed remotely. Device parameters can be adjusted remotely as well. Upon reviewing the feedback event information, the audiologist can set the gain in the hearing aid to suit audibility needs while making the most educated guess to avoid potential feedback problems. In various embodiments, this can be based on the wearer's hearing loss and any preliminary calculation of maximum stable gain of the hearing aid. The hearing aid wearer is asked to come back for a follow up visit at a later time, such as one or two weeks. Other times may be used without departing from the scope of the present subject matter. During this time a feedback tracking algorithm can be run on the hearing aid, or aids, to be monitored. In various embodiments, the tracking algorithm is continually run on the hearing aid. In various embodiments, the tracking algorithm is activated during the 1 to 2 week monitoring period, depending on the preference of the audiologist. In various embodiments, the tracking algorithm is activated upon certain programmable events, such as an acoustic environment change, occurrence of multiple acoustic feedback events, or other programmable events. In various embodiments, there are means in the fitting software to disable or reset the feedback tracking algorithm.

0021In some embodiments, the feedback tracking algorithm constantly monitors information including, but not limited to, the total number of occurrences of feedback, severity of the feedback, and/or a number of feedback occurrences per unit time until the next follow up. If needed to avoid false alarms, the feedback tracking algorithm can be disabled for a few seconds after power up so that feedback due to insertion of hearing aid into ear is not taken into consideration. The data is collected over an interval of time until the follow up session.

0022When the hearing aid user comes back to the audiologist office (or in the case of a remote visit, when the data is provided to the audiologist), the fitting software will display the information that would help the audiologist to fine tune the prescribed gain to minimize feedback problems. This allows gain to be reduced in bands of high feedback problems and increase gain (if needed) in bands with no feedback problems. Higher the probability of feedback in a band, more gain reduction can be prescribed in that band. This will ensure that the hearing aid performance is maximized to provide increased audibility while reducing risks of feedback in a convenient, straight forward manner.

0023<figref idref="f0002">FIG. 2</figref> demonstrates one type of output possible with the present system, according to one embodiment of the present subject matter. The data representing feedback occurrences at particular frequencies is statistically collected and provided as a histogram in this example. This type of output tells the audiologist the likelihood of feedback as a function of frequency for a relatively large sample space as opposed to a limited amount of information found during a patient visit. There are different ways that the fitting software can display the information on feedback. Thus, the present discussion is demonstrative and not intended to be an exhaustive or exclusive depiction of the system and its operation.

0024In various embodiments, the feedback tracking algorithm is adapted to run on the digital signal processor of the hearing assistance device. In some embodiments, the data is statistically collected and stored in memory resident in the hearing aid. In various embodiments, the data is transferred to another storage device. Such devices include data storage accessible over the INTERNET or other network, a personal data storage, such as a personal digital assistant, iPod, cellular phone, or other digital storage device. Such transfer may be performed in a wired or wireless approach, or via a recharging step where the data is downloaded. The wireless approaches including, but are not limited to radio frequency transmission or magnetic coupling transmission. In some embodiments, the data is logged for later processing, such as set forth in <patcit id="pcit0003" dnum="US27679506A"><text>U.S. patent application serial no. 11/276,795 filed March 14, 2006</text></patcit>, which is also published as <patcit id="pcit0004" dnum="US20070217620A"><text>U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0217620 on Sep. 20, 2007</text></patcit>, titled: "SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING HEARING ASSISTANCE DEVICE SETTINGS USING DETECTED SOUND ENVIRONMENT," which documents are all incorporated by reference in their entirety.

0025<figref idref="f0003">FIG. 3</figref> shows a functional block diagram of a hearing assistance system according to one embodiment of the present invention and a representation of an acoustic feedback path. The hearing assistance system 100 includes a microphone 110, which receives input sound 108 and provides a signal 112 to an analog-to-digital converter 120. A digital representation 122 of the signal 112 is provided to the summer 130. The summer 130, sound processor 140 and acoustic feedback estimator with adaptive bulk delay 160 are configured in a negative feedback configuration to provide a cancellation of the acoustic feedback 190. In <figref idref="f0003">FIG. 3</figref>, the input sound 108 is desired signal and conceptually separate from acoustic feedback 190. In providing the cancellation, signal 124 represents a form of error signal to assist in producing the acoustic feedback estimate 126 from acoustic feedback estimator with adaptive bulk delay 160. Sound processor 140 can be implemented to provide a number of signal processing tasks, at least some of which are found in hearing assistance systems. The resulting processed digital output 144 is received by driver 150 and used to drive receiver 180. In one embodiment, driver 150 is a digital to analog converter and amplifier combination to drive receiver 180. In one embodiment, driver 150 is a direct drive. In one embodiment, driver 150 is a pulse width modulator. In one embodiment, driver 150 is a pulse density modulator. Receiver 180 also can vary. In one embodiment, receiver 180 is a speaker. In on embodiment, receiver 180 is a transducer. Other drivers and receivers may be used without departing from the scope of the present subject matter.

0026Digital output 144 is provided to the acoustic feedback estimator with adaptive bulk delay 160 to create the acoustic feedback estimate 126. Summer 130 subtracts acoustic feedback estimate 126 from digital representation 122 to create error signal 124.

0027It is understood that various amplifier stages, filtering stages, and other signal processing stages are combinable with the present teachings without departing from the scope of the present subject matter.

0028The sound cancellation is necessary since acoustic output from the receiver 180 invariably couples with the microphone 110 through a variety of possible signal paths. Some example acoustic feedback paths may include air paths between the receiver 180 and microphone 110, sound conduction paths via the enclosure of hearing assistance system 100, and sound conduction paths within the enclosure of hearing assistance system 100. Such coupling paths are collectively shown as acoustic feedback 190.

0029If properly implemented the feedback system of <figref idref="f0003">FIG. 3</figref> will produce an acoustic feedback estimate 126 which is closely modeled after acoustic feedback 190. Summer 130 will subtract the acoustic feedback estimate 126 from signal 122, thereby cancelling the effect of acoustic feedback 190 in signal 124. As the cancellation becomes ideal signal 124 approaches signal 122, which is a digital representation of input sound 108. It is noted that signal 124 is called an error signal only because it represents error to the closed loop system (that is when it departs from signal 122 that is error). When working properly, the information on error signal 124 is the desired sound information from input sound 108. Thus, the "error" nomenclature does not mean that the signal is purely error, but rather that its departure from the desired signal indicates error in the closed loop feedback system.

0030The acoustic feedback cancellation is performed using the digital signal processor (DSP) in digital embodiments. The DSP can be used to perform the feedback event tracking function of the present subject matter. Multiband or subband implementations can involve acoustic feedback cancellation that is performed on a band-by-band basis. Therefore collection of acoustic feedback events per band is relatively straightforward.

0031The present subject matter can be used for a variety of hearing assistance devices, including but not limited to, cochlear implant type hearing devices, hearing aids, such as behind-the-ear (BTE), in-the-ear (ITE), in-the-canal (ITC), or completely-in-the-canal (CIC) type hearing aids. It is understood that behind-the-ear type hearing aids may include devices that reside substantially behind the ear or over the ear. Such devices may include hearing aids with receivers associated with the electronics portion of the behind-the-ear device, or hearing aids of the type having receivers in the ear canal of the user. Such devices are also known as receiver-in-the-canal (RIC) or receiver-in-the-ear (RITE) hearing instruments. It is understood that other hearing assistance devices not expressly stated herein may fall within the scope of the present subject matter.

0032This application is intended to cover adaptations or variations of the present subject matter. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the present subject matter should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of legal equivalents to which such claims are entitled.