Method for depositing a solder material on a substrate
Abstract
The present invention is related to a method for providing solder material on a predetermined area on a substrate, comprising the steps of providing a substrate (1),producing a confinement layer (7) extending on a first area of a first surface of the substrate, said confinement layer comprising a confinement material, the confinement material and the solder material repelling each other,producing a wetting layer (9), extending on a second area, comprising a wetting material, the second area lying within the first area, the wetting material attracting the solder material,depositing the solder material (10) on a part of the wetting layer, said solder material being indium,reflowing the solder material until the wetting layer is covered with a layer of solder material. Further a novel packaging method is disclosed. Also a novel type of package is described.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 28 February 2025, 1.6 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
30 claims: 4 independent, 26 dependent
- 1A method for providing solder material on a predetermined area on a substrate, comprising the steps of - providing a substrate (1), - producing a confinement layer (7) extending on a first area of a first surface of the substrate, said confinement layer comprising a confinement material, the confinement material and the solder material repelling each other, - producing a wetting layer (9), extending on a second area, the wetting layer comprising a wetting material, the second area lying within the first area, the wetting material attracting the solder material, - depositing the solder material (10) on a part of the wetting layer, said solder material being indium, - reflowing the solder material until the wetting layer is covered with a layer of solder material.
- 4Method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising the step of producing on the confinement layer a barrier layer (8) extending on a third area lying within the first area, and wherein the wetting layer is produced on said barrier layer, such that said wetting layer and said confinement layer are not in direct physical contact.
- 5The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, further comprising the steps of - producing a confinement layer extending on a first area of a second surface of the substrate, said confinement layer comprising a confinement material, the confinement material and the solder material repelling each other, - producing a wetting layer, extending over a second area on the second surface, comprising a wetting material, the second area of the second surface lying within the first area of the second surface, the wetting material attracting the solder material, - producing a hole or via (100) through the substrate, connecting the second area of the first surface to the second area of the second surface, - applying a wetting layer on at least a part of the inside surface of said hole or via, - depositing the solder material on a part of the wetting layer present on the first surface, said solder material being indium, - reflowing the solder material until the wetting layers on both surfaces are covered with a layer of solder material.
- 25Method for performing wafer level sealing comprising the steps of:- performing the method of any one of claims 1 to 24 on a first substrate, to distribute solder material on a predetermined area of said first substrate, resulting a in first reflow layer;- performing the method of any one of claims 1 to 24 on a second substrate, to distribute solder material on a predetermined area of said second substrate, resulting in a second reflow layer;- performing flip-chip of said second substrate on said first substrate, such that said first reflow layer and said second reflow layer are in physical contact and aligned;- performing an additional reflow step, wherein said first and said second reflow layer are joined.
- 27Method for performing wafer level sealing comprising the steps of:- performing the method of any one of claims 1 to 24 on a first substrate, to distribute solder material on a predetermined area of said first substrate, resulting a in first reflow layer;- producing a confinement layer extending on a first area of a surface of a second substrate, said confinement layer comprising a confinement material, the confinement material and the solder material repelling each other, - producing a wetting layer, extending on a second area of said surface of the second substrate, the wetting layer comprising a wetting material, said second area lying within the first area of the second substrate, the wetting material attracting the solder material, - performing flip-chip of the second substrate on the first substrate, such that said first reflow layer and the wetting layer on said second substrate are in physical contact and aligned, - performing an additional reflow step.
- 28A package, defined by a first substrate, a sidewall and a second substrate forming a top cover or cap, said sidewall comprising Indium, said sidewall comprising :- attached to each substrate respectively, a confinement layer (7) forming a track with a given width, - above each confinement layer, as seen from the respective substrate, a wetting layer (9) forming a track with a width smaller than the respective confinement layer's width.
Independent claims17
71 paragraphs, as filed
<b>Field of the invention</b>
0001The present invention relates to the field of 2D and 3D hybrid integration and sealing of micro and nano electronic devices as for instance sensors and Micro Electromechanical Systems (MEMS). More generally it relates to a method for depositing a solder material on a substrate in the form of a predetermined pattern, which can extend 2-dimensionally (2D - in plane) or 3-dimensionally (3D).
<b>State of the art</b>
0002State of the art methods for depositing a solder material on a substrate in the form of a predetermined pattern are for instance (electrical) plating, stencil printing or thermal evaporation.
0003Problems arise if a large variety of geometrical shapes and areas on the substrate require deposition of the solder material. This is typically the case in (hermetic) sealing-ring packages (see Fig. 1) that require a wide rim of solder material for mechanical stability and a small nozzle at one point of the rim to allow degassing or evacuation of the cavity. The nozzle can be realized by a small indent of the rim that is closed by a subsequent reflow of the solder (so-called indent re-flow sealing, see for instance in US-6297072).
0004The problems stem from the non-uniform deposition of the solder material. Such non-uniformities introduce deviations from parallelism and impede the soldering process. The cause of this non-uniformity is twofold: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>1. Deposition by electro-plating (Sn/Pb-alloys and In) suffers from electric field-line crowding (i.e. current crowding) at edges. The deposition rates are therefore different for different geometries. If different shapes or sizes of the deposition areas are present on the same substrate there will be a local variation of the amount of deposited material.</li><li>2. As for evaporated material, small structures are difficult to define with the thick resists that are required for the lift-off of the thick soldering metal. In particular small structures of different sizes on the same substrate are difficult to define. The extreme case can be that small structures are not fully developed (they remain open).</li></ul>
0005Different geometries and sizes of solder areas are ubiquitous in wafer level packaging because various kinds of devices may be manufactured on a single wafer. Non-uniformities of the solder deposition impede further miniaturization of this packaging technique.
0006It is therefore desirable to find a method, which permits an application of the solder so as to adapt for the here mentioned non-uniformities. It would be even more preferable to have a method that can be used to provide the solder on locations on the substrate that are out of reach of the present solder deposition-techniques (electro-plating and thermal evaporation), i.e. into pitches and via-holes.
0007Typical solder materials today are for instance Sn/Pb. The use of Pb will be banned by law, so new alternatives are sought; these alternatives should preferably have good properties and/or should allow methods such that hermetic sealing is possible and a stable bond is formed (e.g. high shear force).
<b>Aims of the invention</b>
0008The present invention aims to provide a method, which permits a uniform distribution of the solder. It is a further aim of the present invention to provide a method which allows to distribute the solder to locations on the substrate/device that are out of reach of the present solder deposition-techniques (electro-plating and thermal evaporation), e.g. into pitches and via-holes, or under bridge-like structures.
<b>Summary of the invention</b>
0009The invention is related to a method such as described in appended claims 1 to 26. This method allows to distribute the solder to locations on the substrate/device that are out of reach of the present solder deposition-techniques (electro-plating and thermal evaporation), e.g. into pitches and via-holes, or under bridge-like structures.
0010According to the present invention, the reflowed layer of solder material has a uniform thickness, which is advantageous for instance in packaging applications.
0011A property of the method according to the present invention is such that the first area, the second area and layer thicknesses of the wetting layer and if present barrier layer, are chosen such that the repelling force between the reflow material and the confinement layer is big enough such that the reflow material does not leave the second area during the reflow step.
0012In certain embodiments of the present invention the reflow material is partly flowing under at least part of a bridge-like or overhanging structure during the reflow step. This is an advantage compared to state of the art solder deposition techniques. An example is for instance the production of T-stack, comprising a confinement layer, wetting layer and advantageously barrier layer, after which for instance a cantilever is appearing - placed or produced above at least part of this pattern. The present invention allows then, contrary to the prior art, to provide a layer of solder material under this cantilever structure. Moreover the reflow material is typically conductive and this technique can thus be used for contacting under a bridge-like structure.
0013In certain embodiments the reflow material fills through holes or vias, possibly connected to internal cavities, during the reflow step. In further embodiments the reflow material flows towards the other side of the substrate, after which a second side of the substrate is at least partially covered with solder material.
0014The method of the invention is compatible and can be used with an indent reflow sealing technique (see for instance in US-6297072), as described in appended claims 25 to 27. The method according to this aspect of the invention can further comprise the formation of an indent in the first or the second reflow layer before the flip-chip step. The invention is equally related to a package such as described in appended claims 28 to 30. This package can to be applied in all fields as for instance, but not limited to, MEMS packaging or sensor packaging (e.g. Infrared Sensors).
<b>Short description of the drawings</b>
0015Fig. 1 represents the principle of sealing by indent reflow (cross-section). The cavity can be (hermetically) sealed by the re-flow after it has been evacuated/degassed via the small indent (nozzle) on the right.
0016Fig. 2 represents the fluxless guided-flow metallisation stack. The T-stack acts like a railway or guiding path confining the liquid indium to the wettable metal areas.
0017Fig. 3 represents the adaptive indium distribution by fluxless guided-flow. Indium is non-uniformly distributed on the sealing rim (A), as shown in the drawing (B). After a re-flow step at T > 160 °C, the indium is distributed uniformly on the rim (C).
0018Fig. 4 represents the guided re-flow of indium for indent re-flow sealing application. The width of the indent is about 10 micron while the rest of the metal has a width of 80 micron. The indium is well distributed all over the structure and has a uniform thickness. (C) is a zoom picture of (B), which is a zoom picture of (A).
0019Fig.5A to Fig.5M illustrate a process flow according to the method of the present invention.
0020Fig. 6 represents some of the sealing patterns for which the method according to the present invention has been tested.
0021Fig. 7 illustrates the embodiment wherein two opposite surfaces of a substrate are covered with indium, reflowed from one surface to the other through a hole in the substrate.
<b>Detailed description of the invention</b>
0022A method for producing a distribution of a solder with uniform thickness is disclosed. The method allows distributing the solder to locations on the substrate/device that are out of reach of the present solder deposition-techniques (electro-plating and thermal evaporation), i.e. into pitches and via-holes. The method according to the present invention makes use of Indium as a solder material.
0023The method is based on the reflow properties of indium in combination with the ability to deposit indium on very fine structures. The concept is depicted in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.
0024According to the invention, the indium is deposited through the following process steps: <ul id="ul0002" list-style="dash" compact="compact"><li>a confinement layer 7 is produced, extending on a first area on the substrate's surface 1. The confinement layer repels the indium. The term 'extending on' is meant to describe the situation wherein the orthogonal projection of the layer's in-plane borders on the substrate substantially corresponds to the area.</li><li>a wetting layer 9 is produced, extending on a second area lying within the first area. The wetting layer attracts the indium, in order to facilitate the flow. The wetting layer is produced above the confinement layer, and preferably but not necessarily in direct contact with the confinement layer. A barrier layer may be present between the two (see next paragraph).</li><li>on the wetting layer, the indium 10 is deposited and subsequently reflowed to cover the wetting layer, thus forming a solder layer extending on said wetting layer.</li></ul>
0025Optionally, lying within the first area, a barrier layer 8 is provided on the confinement layer to prevent diffusion of the indium into the substrate. In this case, the wetting layer is produced on the barrier layer. The barrier layer's surface is preferably larger than the wetting layer's surface.
0026According to the preferred embodiment, first and second area's are such that the confinement and wetting layer (and possibly the barrier layer) form an 'inverted T-stack'. In other words, the confinement layer 7 forms a track with a given width, while the wetting layer 9 equally forms a track with a width smaller than the confinement layer's width. Preferably, the second area is distributed laterally symmetrical with respect to the first area, characterized by a distance of non-overlap d (see fig. 2). In other words, both tracks have the same longitudinal symmetry line, so that there is a constant distance of non-overlap d on both sides of that symmetry line.
0027During the re-flow step the indium is melted and distributed over the guiding metal track. The T-metal stack, defining the guiding metal track, permits the indium to flow at elevated temperatures, but also confines the flowing indium to prevent liquid metal spilling on the surface of the substrate. The T-structure allows for a larger repelling force, compared to the case wherein the confinement layer and the wetting layer cover the same area. This property is particularly important for silicon and glass/quartz substrates since indium has a strong affinity to silicon and glass.
0028Possible typical advantageous dimensions and materials of the T-stack are provided in the following table. Any combination of wettable material and barrier material is possible. The combinations Au/Ni and Au/Pt are preferred. Advantageously the barrier layer is present, but combinations without the barrier layer are not excluded; though the latter provide a lower long-term stability. <tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><table frame="all"><title>Table 1</title><tgroup cols="3" colsep="1" rowsep="1"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="52.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="52.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="52.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" /><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><b>Materials</b></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><b>Thickness (typical)</b></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>Wettable metal</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">Au, Cu</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">50 - 250 nm (see below, <i>T</i><sub><i>WL</i></sub>)</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>Barrier metal</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">Ni, Pt</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">100 - 300 nm, e.g. 200 nm</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>Confinement metal</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">Ti<sub>x</sub>W<sub>1-x</sub> (x = 5% - 100%)</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">10 - 30 nm</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables> As a rule of thumb, the minimum distance of non-overlap (d) of the wettable and the confinement metal can be advantageously chosen to be 1 µm for a resulting indium thickness <i>H</i><sub><i>In</i></sub>(after reflow) smaller than 10 µm, with an additional safety margin of 1 µm per 10 µm additional indium started (i.e. d=2 µm for an indium thickness <i>H</i><sub><i>In</i></sub> between 10 & 20 µm).
0029The thickness of the wetting layer must not exceed a critical thickness <i>H</i><sub><i>WM</i></sub> given by the formation of the first intermetallic alloy between indium and the wettable metal. The nature of this first intermetallic alloy depends on the metals used for the wettable layer and the solder layer. The question of whether or not this alloy is formed depends on the thickness of the wettable layer, in such a way that the alloy is formed when the thickness of the wettable layer exceeds a critical value. This critical thickness H<sub>WM</sub> can be calculated according to the following equation.<maths id="math0001"><img file="EP1575084A2_D0001.tif" /></maths> In this equation <i>In%</i> refers to the indium weight-percentage of the first intermetallic alloy, <i>H</i><sub><i>In</i></sub> to the height of the deposited indium and ρ<sub>WM</sub> and ρ<sub>In</sub> to the densities of the wettable metal and of indium (7.3 g/cm<sup>3</sup>), respectively.
0030The absence of the first intermetallic alloy guarantees a long-term stability of the metal stack UBM(Under Bump Metallisation)/Indium and thus of the (sealed) package and is believed to contribute to the high resulting shear force (experimental results are disclosed further in the text).
0031For the example of the wettable metal gold the first intermetallic is AuIn<sub>2</sub> formed at an indium weight-percentage of 55%. A calculation with 5 µm indium leads to 850 nm critical thickness of gold, i.e. the total thickness of deposited gold should be substantially below this value. As a safety margin a factor 2 is advised, leading to a total gold thickness of about 400 nm.
0032The re-flow conditions are set by the thermal conductivity of the substrate. The temperature should exceed 160 °C, typically it would be between 180 - 280 °C. The re-flow should be conducted in an environment of forming gas, which avoids the oxidation of the Indium (typically a mixture of <i>N</i><sub>2</sub> and <i>H</i><sub>2</sub>; advantageously the concentration of <i>H</i><sub>2</sub> is larger than 2% and smaller than about 5%). Care has to be taken that no indium oxide is formed prior to the re-flow. This can be avoided by depositing a photo resist layer on the reflow layer, which is then stripped just before the reflow step.
0033The method according to the present invention is particularly suited for hermetic packaging by indent re-flow sealing and for zero-level packaging. There are major advantages compared to other technologies like BCB (Benzo Cyclo Butene) - based sealing and Sn/Pb based sealing: <ul id="ul0003" list-style="bullet" compact="compact"><li>smaller dimensions can be achieved (because fine dimensions can be manufactured for the T-stack). The indium deposition doesn't need to happen on very small structures as for instance a 10 µm wide or smaller pattern; they can be performed on a pattern of for instance 80 µm wide or bigger (see also further); during a reflow step the Indium will flow over the hole UBM pattern, which can comprise a narrower part or sub feature with much smaller widths (for instance 10 µm or smaller, see Fig. 4). The Indium can be deposited on only part of the wetting layer, and the relative size of this part is not relevant. It should further also be understood that enough Indium needs to be present on this 'only part' of the wetting layer, in order to be able to flow over the whole wetting pattern. An indicative parameter can be the fraction<maths id="math0002"><math display="block"><mrow><msub><mrow><mtext mathvariant="italic">F = V</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext mathvariant="italic">In</mtext></mrow></msub><mtext>/</mtext><msub><mrow><mtext mathvariant="italic">S</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext mathvariant="italic">WM</mtext></mrow></msub><mtext> = </mtext><mfrac><mrow><mtext mathvariant="italic">Volume Indium</mtext><mtext>(</mtext><mtext mathvariant="italic">deposited on</mtext><mtext> '</mtext><mtext mathvariant="italic">only part</mtext><mtext>' </mtext><mtext mathvariant="italic">of the wetting layer</mtext><mtext>)</mtext></mrow><mrow><mtext mathvariant="italic">Surface wetting layer</mtext></mrow></mfrac><mtext> ;</mtext></mrow></math><img file="EP1575084A2_D0002.tif" /></maths> preferably the thickness of the Indium after reflow should be higher than 50 nm, even more preferably higher than 100 nm to guarantee a good reflow process which results in a homogeneously thick Indium layer which covers the whole wetting layer. This means that preferably <i>F</i> > 0.05. Even more preferably <i>F</i> > 0.1 .</li><li>according to the present invention the Indium doesn't have to be applied over the finally required region.</li><li>the out-gas rate of indium is much lower than BCB or plastics, which typically need solvents before application; these solvents are never completely removed in typical processes.</li><li>the sealing material is non-hygroscopic (e.g. doesn't absorb water) and conductive (which is not the case for instance BCB).</li><li>indium forms.metallic joints already at room temperature and is soft (this eases parallelism during the bonding process because flip-chip tools usually exhibit a worse parallelism at higher pressure)</li><li>the re-flow temperature is lower than for Sn/Pb-alloys.</li></ul>
0034In a further embodiment the ability to feature 3D integration is disclosed, i.e. an interconnect through the wafer through a via and the flow of indium through micro-machined ditches etc. While during the reflow step, the solder/Indium material flows along the pattern defined by the UBM stack, it can be guided towards a through hole or via.
0035According to this embodiment, in addition to the process steps described above for the first surface of the substrate, a confinement layer is produced on the opposite (second) surface of the substrate as well, in the same manner as described above, extending on a first area of the second surface. A wetting layer is applied on a second area of the second surface, with possibly a barrier layer between the confinement and the wetting layers.
0036A hole is produced connecting the second area on the first surface to the second area on the second surface, i.e. the hole is situated between the respective areas. A wetting layer is equally applied to the inside surface of this hole or via, so that this surface is at least partially covered with a wetting layer, and preferably completely covered. The presence of a barrier material on the inside surface of the hole can be advantageous but is not necessary. The presence of a confinement layer on the inside of the hole is possible but not necessary since the confinement is performed by the through hole or via itself. It is to be noted that the hole is not necessarily formed after the confinement and wetting layers have been produced on both sides of the substrate. Typically, the hole is produced before applying these layers.
0037Indium is then deposited on a part of the wetting layer of the first surface, followed by a reflow step, whereby indium flows over the wetting layer of the first surface, through the hole, and over the wetting layer of the second surface, until the wetting layers on both surfaces are covered with a layer of indium, extending on the wetting layers.
0038The wetting layer on the second surface and thus the resulting indium layer on the second surface, can serve as a contacting area towards underlying substrates, chips, or any electronic structure known in the art which need to be electrically contacted or interconnected. They can be designed to provide well-positioned contact-pads on the second surface of the substrate, which are connected to the front side, which can comprise electrical elements. In the same way the wetting layer on the first surface and thus the resulting indium layer on the first surface can comprise patterns which can serve as interconnect patterns. In certain embodiments according to the present invention the indium reflowed layer is forming interconnects from a first surface of the wafer to a second surface of the wafer.
0039An additional driver for the through hole filling can be capillary force.
0040In a further embodiment internal cavities, which are connected to a (through) hole can be filled during the reflow step.
0041The via or through hole is attached on both sides of the wafer to another UBM stack, such that indium that passes through the wafer keeps on reflowing on the other side of the substrate.
0042This is illustrated in figure 7. In the embodiment shown, the hole 100 is covered on its inside surface by the confinement layer 7, and the wetting layer 8. The indium 10 is shown before (fig. 7a) and after reflow (fig. 7b). The hole 100 forms a connection between the wetting layers on both sides of the substrate. Confinement layers are equally present on both sides, so that the .indium covers the wetting layers on both sides of the substrate, after the reflow step. In the case of fig. 7, an electrically insulating layer 101 is present under the confinement layer. In the embodiment shown in figure 7, the hole was produced before applying the insulating layer, confinement and wetting layers. That way, these layers are all present on the inside surface of the hole. As stated above, it is only the wetting layer which is necessary according to the invention, on at least a part of this inside surface.
0043According to the preferred embodiment, the confinement layer, possible barrier layer and wetting layer on the second surface, equally form a T-stack, as was described for the layers on the first surface. All the embodiments described above in terms of materials and layer thicknesses etc, can be applied as well to the layers on the second surface.
0044There are alternative techniques for conductive via fillings like poly-silicon. However, these techniques require higher temperatures (- 630 °C) and are therefore not suitable as silicon back-end processes since standard CMOS can only resist to temperatures up to maximum 450°C or for other types of substrates like for instance polymer or organic substrates which cannot tolerate such high temperatures.
0045The invention is equally related to a method of producing a package through wafer level sealing, wherein the method described above is applied on at least one substrate, to produce a pattern of reflowed indium on the first substrate. On a second substrate, e.g. a MEMS substrate, the same method is preferably applied to obtain a similar pattern. After that, the second substrate is aligned and positioned onto the first by a flip-chip step, and the sealing is obtained by an additional reflow step, thereby joining the two indium layers effectively together. Alternatively, a confinement layer and a wetting layer are applied to the second substrate, but no indium layer is deposited and reflowed on the second substrate. In that case, the indium layer on the first substrate alone makes sure that the sealing is obtained. Also in this case, after joining, a second reflow step is performed.
0046The invention is thus related to a package defined by a first substrate, a sidewall and a second substrate forming a top cover or cap, said sidewall comprising Indium, said sidewall comprising: <ul id="ul0004" list-style="dash" compact="compact"><li>attached to each substrate respectively, a confinement layer forming a track with a given width,</li><li>above each confinement layer, as seen from the respective substrate, a wetting layer forming a track with a width smaller than the respective confinement layer's width.</li></ul>
0047Each confinement layer and each wetting layer which is present above said confinement layer preferably have the same longitudinal symmetry line. A barrier layer may be present between at least one confinement layer and the wetting layer present above said confinement layer.
0048For the package according to the invention, the confinement layer, wetting layer and reflowed indium layer(s) may have the characteristics as described above with respect to the method of the invention, in terms of materials, layer thicknesses etc.
<b>Experimental Results</b>
0049First tests of the re-flow capabilities of indium have been performed on silicon wafers. The T-stack in this case was <i>Ti</i><sub>5%</sub><i>W</i><sub>95%</sub>/Au (10/200 nm), i.e. without diffusion barrier. The re-flow was conducted in a forming gas rapid anneal oven (4 min, 280 °C), see Fig. 5.
0050A typical process flow is described below with reference to Fig. 5. The different steps and parameters, which describe these steps, correspond to a specific embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood that a person skilled in the art could vary various steps or parameters without changing the general idea, which is described in the claims. A. A wafer e.g. Si wafer, with a dielectric layer is provided (e.g. a 1.5 µm Si-oxide). Alignment crosses are covered with vacuum tape.
<i>Under bump metallisation (UBM)</i>
0051<ul id="ul0005" list-style="none"><li>B. A layer of 30nm of TiW [typically between 25 and 35 nm] and 500 nm of Au are sputtered.</li><li>C. The vacuum tape is removed from the wafer; the alignment crosses are visible now.</li><li>D. A positive resist is spin coated on the wafer. The wafer is baked during one minute on a hotplate of 120 °C. After baking, the resist thickness is about 2,7 µm.</li><li>E. The resist is exposed in a contact mask aligner in hard contact mode. A UBM negative mask was applied. To develop the resist, a solution of diluted TMHA (Tetramethylammonium Hydroxide)-based photo-resist developer is used. The exposure time/development time can be reduced to compensate the effects of a gold under etch (see next step).</li><li>F. A KI/I2/H2O solution is used for the gold etch. The etch time is a function of the thickness of the gold layer. The wafer is rinsed with water immediately after etching. The selectivity compared to TiW is good. A new UBM negative mask forms new alignment crosses for the plating mask.</li><li>G. The resist is stripped with for instance acetone to remove the major part of the resist, followed by hot acetone (50 °C) to remove the rests and finally IPA (IsoPropyl Alcohol) to avoid traces when drying the wafer.</li></ul>
<u>Indium plating</u>
0052<ul id="ul0006" list-style="none"><li>H. A positive plating resist is spin coated on the wafer. The resist excess at the border of the wafer is removed (edge bead removal). The wafer is baked during 60 minutes in 90 °C oven. After baking, the resist thickness is about 9 µm.</li><li>I. The resist is exposed in a mask aligner in hard contact mode. The alignment crosses are defined by the previous - UBM - mask. To develop the resist, a solution of diluted TMAH based photo-resist developer is used. Extra attention is drawn to the alignment: to achieve a good plating the resist must cover the TiW layer, no TiW should be exposed to the plating solution.</li><li>J. The backside of the wafer is coated with a positive resist to protect this side of the wafer from being plated. The wafer is baked during 15 minutes in a 95 °C oven. Before plating, an oxygen plasma is applied to the sample in a RIE (Reactive Ion Etching) plasma etch system. Plating is done in an Indium plating solution. Plating thickness is about 8 to 9 µm.</li><li>K. The resist (coated on the backside of the wafer) is stripped with acetone to remove the major part of the resist, followed by hot acetone (50 °C) to remove the rests and finally IPA (IsoPropyl Alcohol) to avoid traces when drying the wafer.</li></ul>
<b>Indium reflow</b>
0053<ul id="ul0007" list-style="none"><li>L. The wafer is heated up to 280 °C during 4 minutes in a reflow oven. The previous step and the reflow are done directly after the plating to avoid oxidation of the Indium metal surface.</li><li>M. The TiW layer is etched in a H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, 40% solution. The etch rate is about 0.75 µm/min. Total etch time is about 40 minutes.</li><li>N. The wafer is covered with resist to protect the Indium from being oxidised (not depicted in Fig. 5).</li><li>O. Before the flip chip of the device, the resist is stripped. A <i>CF</i><sub>4</sub>-plasma (alternatively for instance a <i>SF</i><sub><i>6</i></sub> plasma) is given to remove possible leftovers of the resist and to avoid oxidation of the Indium (not depicted in Fig. 5).</li><li>P. Flip chip (not depicted in Fig. 5) of the MEMS wafer, whereby in preferred embodiments also a similar UBM stack is applied on the MEMS wafer before the flip chip, following the same patterns. Hereby an UBM/In/UBM layer structure can be acquired. It is not necessary that an Indium layer is present on both wafers. This means that for the production of a package, the steps of the method of claim 1 can be applied to one wafer, while on the other, only a confinement layer and a wetting layer are applied, with the same pattern of the corresponding layers on the other wafer.</li></ul>
<b>Second Indium reflow</b>
0054<ul id="ul0008" list-style="none"><li>Q. After flip chip a second reflow is done to create an intermetallic of the indium with the top metal layer or UBM stack of the MEMS wafer. This will also improve the bonding strength. The sample is heated up to 280° C during 4,5 minutes in forming gas atmosphere. This step can be combined with an Indent Reflow Sealing technique to control the atmosphere in the package.</li></ul>
0055Different shapes of rims have been realized (some are depicted in Fig. 6), using the above described technology. The rims have been flipped and underwent an X-ray test, a leak test & a shear test. The X-ray test showed the presence of the first intermetallic alloy.
Gross leak test:
0056Gross leak tests are performed in two baths with liquids. The liquids have different boiling temperatures. The vacuum package is kept in the bath with the liquid with the lower boiling temperature for several hours. Then the sample is moved to the bath with the higher boiling temperature. If there is a gross leak, liquid with the lower boiling temperature is inside the package and starts to boil. This becomes visible by forming of bubbles (see: MIL-STD-202G, 8 February 2002).
Fine leak test:
0057For the fine leak test a small hole is drilled in the package (1mm<sup>2</sup>). The package is pumped down to high vacuum through this hole. The vacuum pump is connected to a helium leak test system. From the other side helium is sprayed against the package. If the package is leaky a helium signal can be detected at the leak detector. <tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><table frame="all"><title>Table 1</title><tgroup cols="5" colsep="1" rowsep="1"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="31.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col5" align="left">Hermeticity tests & results:</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center">Time in He</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">Fine Leak Pressure</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">Fine leak</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="center">Gross leak Time in FC84 T of FC40</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center">(h)</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">(bar)</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">(mbarl/sec)</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center">(h)</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center">(C)</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center">95</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1 bar (no vacuum)</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">(3 ±0.1)E-9</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center">45,3</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center">110</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables> No fine leak was measured with the leak detector system. A gross leak was performed and no gross leak was determined. Time in first fluorined FC84 (3M trademark) was 94 hours 30 min and the temperature of FC40 (3M trademark) was 110 °C (FC84 and FC40 are fluorocarbon liquids). Shear tests & results: A set of 10 devices flip chip mounted with Indium on a 3" wafer. Mounting structures were Indium ring-structures, with adhesion areas between 100 and 250 µm<sup>2</sup>. A shear test was performed. <tables id="tabl0003" num="0003"><table frame="all"><title>Table 3</title><tgroup cols="2" colsep="1" rowsep="1"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="78.75mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="78.75mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>Sample</b><b>nr</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><b>Shear force</b><b>(gf)</b></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>1</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1713.23</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>2</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">2048.21</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>3</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1795.57</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>4</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1084.8</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>5</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1766.01</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>6</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">841.31</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>7</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1343.42</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>8</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1762.14</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>9</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">1492.26</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><b>10</b></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">970.09</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables> Shear strengths in the range of about 1 to 2,5 kgf were reached. The shear strength is only indicative, but is very high, i.e. much higher than most standard requirements.
0058The conclusions from these tests were that indium re-flow sealing, according to the present invention, creates hermetic packages and that it provides for sufficiently large mechanical strength of these packages.
11 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US8809082B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8324103B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2012107973A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| WO2010075831A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2009153728A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP1987535A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO2014023320A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2009153728A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP0951068A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| US2002086144A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US5730932A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6046074A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6362435B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6409073B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
9 members in 4 offices; this record represents the family
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 549216P | United States of America | – | |
| 54921604 | United States of America | P | |
| 04447054 | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | |
| 04447054 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A |
Members9
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP1571704A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| EP1575084A2This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP1575084A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| US2005227413A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP1575084B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT469436T | Austria | T | |
| ATE469436T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE602005021419D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| US8227331B2 | United States of America | B2 |
63 legal events, as 7 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Fee paymentPLFP | PLFP | FR | |
| Fee paymentPLFP | PLFP | FR | |
| Fee paymentPLFP | PLFP | FR | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent lapsedLapsedMM4A | MM4A | IE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| No opposition filed against granted patent, or epo opposition proceedings concluded without decisionGrantedR097 | R097 | DE | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extensionLTIE | LTIE | EP | |
| Discontinued in the netherlands as no translation has been filedVDEP | VDEP | NL | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| European patents granted designating irelandGrantedFG4D | FG4D | IE | |
| European patent takes effect as a national patent in ch/liEP | EP | CH | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)RAP1 | RAP1 | EP | |
| Designation fees paidAKX | AKX | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAX | AX | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAX | AX | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 1575084
- Application
- 54470448
Titles3
- German
- Methode zum Aufbringen von Lotmaterial in Form eines festgelegten Musters auf ein Substrat
- English
- Method for depositing a solder material on a substrate
- French
- Méthode de déposer un matériau de soudure sur un substrat en form de motif prédéterminé
Classification
- CPC, 21
- B81C1/00269
- B81C3/001
- B81C2203/019
- H05K3/3452
- H05K3/3473
- H05K3/42
- H05K2201/2081
- H05K2203/043
- H05K2201/09572
- H05K3/346
- H10W95/00
- H10W20/023
- H10W76/60
- H10W72/01255
- H10W72/251
- H10W72/07251
- H10W72/20
- H10W72/241
- H10W72/072
- H10W72/07234
- H10W72/07236
- IPC, 9
- B81B7 00
- H01L21 48
- H01L21 50
- H01L21 60
- H01L21 768
- H01L23 10
- H01L23 498
- H05K3 34
- H05K3 42
Designated states36
- Contracting states, 30
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Switzerland
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Germany
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Spain
- Finland
- France
- United Kingdom
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Iceland
- Italy
- Liechtenstein
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
- Monaco
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Poland
and 6 moreShow fewer
- Portugal
- Romania
- Sweden
- Slovenia
- Slovakia
- Türkiye
- Extension states, 6
- Albania
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Croatia
- Latvia
- North Macedonia
- Yugoslavia, later Serbia and Montenegro (until 2006)