Current mode logic circuit
3 claims: 1 independent, 2 dependent
- 1A portable telephonic system, comprising:a duplex switch for coupling an antenna to a receiver (R X ) and to a transmitter (T X ) ;a power supply arranged to be coupled to said receiver;baseband means for coupling said power supply to said receiver, transmitter and to a keypad and a speaker;a microphone coupled to said baseband means;and a phase-lock-loop (32) for coupling said receiver to said transmitter, said phase-lock-loop (32) comprising: a charge pump for coupling a filter to a phase detector, said phase detector being further arranged to be coupled for receiving a clock signal;and a voltage controlled oscillator for coupling a prescaler (31)and an output to said filter, said prescaler (31) being further arranged to be coupled to said phase detector;characterized in that said prescaler (31) comprises: an input buffer for coupling input signals to clock and inverted clock signal inputs of first (29), second and third flip-flops(28);a first input (A) of said first flip-flop (29)coupled to a first output ( Q ) of said second flip-flop;a second input (B) of said first flip-flop(29)coupled to a first output (Q) of said third flip-flop (28);a first output (Q) of said first flip-flop (29) coupled to a first input (D) of said second flip-flop and to a first clock input (CK)of a fourth flip-flop;a second output ( Q ) of said first flip-flop (29) coupled to a second input ( D ) of said second flip-flop and to a second clock input ( CK ) of said fourth flip-flop;a second output (Q) of said second flip-flop coupled to a first input (A) of said third flip-flop (28);a first output (Q) of said fourth flip-flop coupled to a second input (B) of said third flip-flop (28) and to a first clock input (CK) of a fifth flip-flop;a second output ( Q ) of said fourth flip-flop coupled to a second clock input ( CK ) of said fifth flip-flop;a third input (C) of said third flip-flop (28) coupled to the output (O) of a logic gate (30);a first input of said logic gate (A) coupled to receive a select signal (MODE SELECT);a first output (Q) of said fifth flip-flop coupled to a first clock input (CK) of a sixth flip-flop and to a second input (C) of said logic gate (30);a second output ( Q ) of said fifth flip-flop coupled to a second clock input ( CK ) of said sixth flip-flop;and a third input (B) of said logic gate (30) coupled to a first output (Q) of said sixth flip-flop;
- 2The portable telephonic system of Claim 1, wherein said baseband means is an analog/digital baseband means.
- 3The portable telephonic system of Claim 1, wherein said power supply comprises a battery pack coupled to a power supply/regulators.
Independent claims3
21 paragraphs in 5 sections, as filed
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
0001The present application relates to current-mode logic (CML) circuitry and more specifically to a potable telephonic system utilizing a new low-voltage, high-speed gate family consisting of both OR/NOR and AND/NAND logic functions, as well as other more complex functions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
0002Current mode logic (CML) or emitter coupled logic (ECL) circuits are commonly used in high speed applications operating in the GHz frequency range. In these circuits, to reduce the storage time, caused by the presence of minority carriers, the transistors are usually not allowed to operate in hard saturation. Storage time, which is the time before an "ON" transistor starts to turn "OFF", tends to decrease the speed of the circuit. In CML circuits a constant current is maintained in the emitter legs of the transistors with current switching from one transistor leg to another depending on the states of the input signals.
0003<figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> (prior art) shows one version of a conventional OR/NOR gate implemented in MOS CML. The circuit is made up of stacked transistors pairs 3-4 and 5-6 which allow differential inputs <i>A</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i> and <i>B</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">B</o></i> to be applied, respectively. Current source 7 maintains a constant current I through the legs of the circuit at all times. There are three paths, one of which will always be enabled, for current to flow through the circuit, as follows: a) through resistor 1 and transistors 3 and 5, b) through resistor 1 and transistor 6, and c) through resistor 2 and transistors 4 and 5. In the circuit, the signals at <i>A</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i> have to operate with a DC voltage shift relative to the signals at <i>B</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">B̅</o>.</i> For very low V<sub>DD</sub> voltages there is limited headroom available for this voltage shift in order to maintain proper drain-to-source voltage, V<sub>ds</sub>, across the transistors and this usually limits the number of complementary inputs to two. One way to accomplish this voltage shift is with the use of source followers but these add complexity and tend to slow down the circuit. This circuit provides both OR (<i>A</i>+<i>B</i>) and it's complementary NOR (<o ostyle="single"><i>A</i>+<i>B</i></o>) outputs. Table 1 shows a truth table for the circuit: <tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><table frame="none"><tgroup cols="5"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="10mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="10mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="12mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="12mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="12mm" /><thead><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /><entry align="center" valign="top">OR</entry><entry colsep="0" align="right" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" valign="top">NOR</entry></row><row><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>A</i></entry><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>B</i></entry><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>A+B</i></entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top"><i><o ostyle="single">A+B</o></i></entry><entry colsep="0" rowsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /></row></thead><tbody><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row><row><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" rowsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" rowsep="0" align="center" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables> Here the difference between a logic 0 and logic 1 is small, on the order of 400 to 800 mVolts. Some drawbacks of the circuit include: <ol id="ol0001" compact="compact"><li>1. Not suitable for ultra-low voltage operation of <1.2 volts due to the circuit's limited headroom for V<sub>ds</sub> across the stacked transistors pairs.</li><li>2. Limited to two inputs, <i>A</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i> and <i>B</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">B̅</o></i>.</li><li>3. Signals <i>B</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">B̅</o></i> have to be DC shifted compared to signals <i>A</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i>.</li></ol> Although this gate is inherently fast, the required level shifting circuitry, not shown, tends to slow the overall operation of the circuit.
0004<figref idref="f0001">Figure 2</figref> (prior art) shows another commonly used CML circuit which overcomes the problems of the circuit in <figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref>, but as will be discussed, has its own set of problems. Singled-ended input signals <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> are inserted at the gates of transistors 10 and 11. Resistor 8 connects the drains of transistors 10 and 11 to V<sub>DD</sub> to provide a path for current to flow into current source 13 when either or both of these inputs are high (logic level 1). This circuit is not limited to two inputs, although only two are shown, and overcomes the DC level shifting problem of the previous circuit by operating all the transistors at the same voltage level. In addition, transistor 12 and resistor 9 are used to provide another path for current I to flow into current source 13 when both of the input transistors 10 and 11 are "OFF". The V<sub>ref</sub> input is a DC level which biases transistor 12 at the midpoint of the <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> input signal's voltage swing. If both <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> inputs are low (logic level 0), all the current I will flow through V<sub>ref</sub> transistor 12. Then as inputs <i>A</i> and/or <i>B</i> turn "ON" (logic level 1) current will switch and flow through transistors 10 and/or 11. As with the previous circuit, both OR (<i>A</i>+<i>B</i>) and it's complementary NOR (<o ostyle="single"><i>A</i>+<i>B</i></o>) outputs are generated. Although this circuit does overcome the problems of the previous circuit, it has its own drawbacks, as follows: <ol id="ol0002" compact="compact"><li>1. A reference voltage at mid-signal is required.</li><li>2. The circuit only allows single-ended inputs which usually implies larger input swings. This in turn can increase the voltage supply size and reduces the circuit speed. An alternative sometimes used is to keep the input swing constant and increase the size of the MOS transistors, but this also negatively impacts the circuit speed.</li><li>3. Less immunity to noise due to single-ended operation.</li><li>4. Circuit delay is more sensitive to the parasitic elements at node N1 since the node has more movement with V<sub>ref</sub> remaining constant while the inputs <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> move.</li></ol> United Kingdom Patent Application No. <patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="GB2310342A"><text>2310342</text></patcit> describes a portable telephonic system comprising the features set out in the preamble of claim 1.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
0005There is a rapidly growing need in the wireless and portable markets, as well as other markets, for ultra low-power/low-voltage circuitry. High-speed logic circuits operating in the GHz range are more and more in demand. Emitter coupled logic (ECL) circuits represent one family that has been extensively used in wireless applications such as the phase lock loop (PLL) in prescalers and optical communication systems. And more recently CMOS current mode logic is becoming prevalent in the GHz domain.
0006Accordingly, the present invention provides a portable telephonic system as set out in the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
0007The present invention will now be further described, by way of example, with reference to certain exemplary embodiments thereof illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li><figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> is a schematic diagram of a conventional OR/NOR gate in MOS CML;</li><li><figref idref="f0001">Figure 2</figref> is a schematic diagram of another conventional OR/NOR gate with voltage reference in MOS CML;</li><li><figref idref="f0002">Figure 3</figref> is a schematic diagram of an OR/NOR gate in MOS CML;</li><li><figref idref="f0003">Figure 4</figref> is a schematic diagram of an OR/NOR gate in bipolar technology;</li><li><figref idref="f0003">Figure 5</figref> is a schematic diagram of an AND/NAND gate implementation in MOS CML;</li><li><figref idref="f0004">Figure 6</figref> illustrates simulation results of the DC characteristics for the basic OR/NOR gate in MOS CML;</li><li><figref idref="f0005">Figure 7</figref> illustrates simulation results of the transient response for the basic OR/NOR gate in MOS CML;</li><li><figref idref="f0006">Figure 8a</figref> shows a 3-input FCML gate in a D-type flip-flop function in the prescaler of a cellular phone according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;</li><li><figref idref="f0006">Figure 8b</figref> is a 3-input FCML OR gate used as the mode select function in the prescaler application in a cellular phone according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention;</li><li><figref idref="f0007">Figure 8c</figref> is a block diagram of a prescaler circuit showing three FCML circuits used in flip-flop and OR gate functions according to an embodiment of the present invention;</li><li><figref idref="f0007">Figure 8d</figref> is a block diagram of a phase-lock-loop in a cellular phone showing the prescaler function in accordance with the present invention; and</li><li><figref idref="f0008">Figure 8e</figref> is a block diagram for a typical cellular phone showing the phase-lock-loop function according to the present invention;</li></ul>
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
0008<figref idref="f0002">Figure 3</figref> shows a schematic for a current mode logic gate 14, which overcomes most of the problems discussed in the prior art. On the input side, the basic circuit is comprised of resistor 15 and transistors 17 and 18. Additional inputs, indicating by shadowed transistor 21 at input <i>C</i>, can be provided by adding additional transistors in parallel with transistors 17 and 18. Resistor 16 and transistor 19 provide a path for current to flow when both inputs <i>A</i> and <i>B</i> (all inputs) are inhibited. The sources of all the transistors 17-19 and 21 are tied together and connected to a constant current source 20. In the schematic the power supply voltages are shown as V<sub>DD</sub> and V<sub>SS</sub>. In this circuit, V<sub>DD</sub> may be quite small, for example 1.8 volts or less while the input voltage swings will typically range from 400 to 800 mVolts. V<sub>SS</sub> is commonly operated at ground potential. The current paths in the circuit are clearly seen to be through a) resistor 15, transistor 17, and current source 20 and/or b) resistor 15, transistor 18, and current source 20 or c) resistor 16, transistor 19, and current source 20. Again, resistor 16 and transistor 19 provide a path for current to flow when both input signals, <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>, are low (0 state). An important feature of the current mode logic gate 14 is the way the gate of transistor 19 is controlled by tying it to the common drain connection of transistors 17 and 18. This feedback connection overcomes the problems associated with the DC reference voltage of conventional CML circuits. Because of this feedback, the circuit operates in a pseudo differential mode which means that there is only a small movement at node N2; i.e., N2 remains fairly stable since the source of feedback transistor 19 moves complementary to that of input transistors 17 and 18. Also, there is some hysterisis present in the circuit which should provide improved noise margins. Due to the feedback aspect of the circuit, it has been suggested that the circuit be called FCML. The circuit provides complementary outputs <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i>, as shown. Operation of the circuit is as follows, assume that initially both inputs, <i>A</i> and <i>B</i>, are low (0) and transistors 17 and 18 are "OFF" such that output <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> is high (1). In this initial condition, the feedback in the circuit causes transistor 19 to turn "ON" and as a result output <i>O</i> is low (0). Now, when one or both of the inputs, <i>A</i> and/or <i>B</i>, goes high (1), transistor 17 and/or 18 will start to turn "ON" and due to the complementary feedback, as the gate voltage of transistor 19 decreases, transistor 19 starts to turn "OFF" and output <i>O</i> increases. At the end of this transient state when the circuit reaches steady state, outputs <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> will be high (1) and low (0), respectively. The complementary nature of the circuit provides both the OR and NOR functions at outputs <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i>. In the circuit, output <i>O</i> represents the OR function <i>A</i>+<i>B</i> and output <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> represents the NOR function <o ostyle="single"><i>A</i>+<i>B</i></o>. A truth table indicating the circuit's output states for the four possible input conditions is shown below. <tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><table frame="none"><tgroup cols="5"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="10mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="10mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="12mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="12mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="12mm" /><thead><row rowsep="0"><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" valign="top">OR</entry><entry colsep="0" valign="top">NOR</entry></row><row><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top"><i>A</i></entry><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>B</i></entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top"><i>A+B</i></entry><entry colsep="0" valign="top"><i><o ostyle="single">A+B</o></i></entry><entry colsep="0" rowsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /></row></thead><tbody><row rowsep="0"><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row><row rowsep="0"><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row><row rowsep="0"><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row><row><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">1</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center">0</entry><entry colsep="0" align="center" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0009At first consideration, it would appear that this circuit is slower than the conventional circuit of <figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref>, due to the feedback circuitry. However, once source followers are added to the circuit of <figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> to provide the DC level shift at inputs <i>A</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i> and <i>B</i>/<i><o ostyle="single">B</o>,</i> the speed of the two circuits are comparable and the power dissipation for the FCML is favorable.
0010The FCML gate can be implemented using any number of technologies. <figref idref="f0003">Figure 4</figref> shows the same OR/NOR FCML circuit 14 implemented with bipolar technology. As shown, the resistors 22-23, transistors 24-26, and current source 27 match those of the MOS version discussed above, with the exception that now transistors 24-26 are bipolar transistors.
0011<figref idref="f0003">Figure 5</figref> shows an AND/NAND circuit which is the same circuit 14 as shown in <figref idref="f0002">Figure 3</figref>, but with the inputs now being <i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i> and <i><o ostyle="single">B</o>.</i> Therefore, all that is necessary to generate the AND/NAND function is to provide the complements <i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i> and <i><o ostyle="single">B</o></i> at the inputs to the circuit, as shown in <figref idref="f0003">Figure 5</figref>. As in the earlier OR/NOR circuit, additional inputs can be included. The logic functions at the <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> outputs then become <i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i>+<i><o ostyle="single">B</o></i> and <maths id="math0001"><math display="inline"><mover><mrow><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>+</mo><mover><mi>B</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover></mrow><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>,</mo></math><img file="EP0973262B1_D0001.tif" /></maths> respectively. Using De Morgan's Law, it is seen that outputs <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> are <o ostyle="single"><i>A</i>•<i>B</i></o> and <i>A</i>•<i>B</i>, the NAND and AND functions, respectively. A truth table for this circuit is shown below. <tables id="tabl0003" num="0003"><table frame="none"><tgroup cols="5"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="10mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="10mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="11mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="12mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="14mm" /><thead><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /><entry align="center" valign="top" /><entry valign="top">AND</entry><entry align="center" valign="top">NAND</entry></row><row><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>A</i></entry><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>B</i></entry><entry align="center" valign="top"><i>A</i>•<i>B</i></entry><entry valign="top"><o ostyle="single"><i>A</i>•<i>B</i></o></entry><entry rowsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /></row></thead><tbody><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center" /></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center" /></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center" /></row><row><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0012Likewise, other more complex logic functions can be applied to the circuit. For example, assume that the circuit is configured for three inputs, say <i>A</i>, <i><o ostyle="single">B</o></i>, and <i><o ostyle="single">C</o></i>, then the Boolean expressions at outputs <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> become <maths id="math0002"><math display="inline"><mi>A</mi><mo>+</mo><mover><mi>B</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>+</mo><mover><mi>C</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>=</mo><mover><mrow><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>•</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>•</mo><mi>C</mi></mrow><mo>‾</mo></mover></math><img file="EP0973262B1_D0002.tif" /></maths> and <maths id="math0003"><math display="inline"><mover><mrow><mi>A</mi><mo>+</mo><mover><mi>B</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>+</mo><mover><mi>C</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover></mrow><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>=</mo><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>•</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>•</mo><mi>C</mi><mo>,</mo></math><img file="EP0973262B1_D0003.tif" /></maths> respectively. The truth table for this conditions is as follows. <tables id="tabl0004" num="0004"><table frame="none"><tgroup cols="5"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="10mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="10mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="10mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="25mm" colsep="0" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="14mm" /><thead><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center" valign="top" /><entry align="center" valign="top" /><entry colsep="0" align="center" valign="top" /><entry align="center"><i>Q</i></entry><entry align="center"><i><o ostyle="single">Q</o></i></entry></row><row><entry align="center"><i>A</i></entry><entry align="center"><i>B</i></entry><entry align="center"><i>C</i></entry><entry align="center"><maths id="math0004"><math display="block"><mover><mrow><mover><mi>A</mi><mo>‾</mo></mover><mo>•</mo><mi>B</mi><mo>•</mo><mi>C</mi></mrow><mo>‾</mo></mover></math><img file="EP0973262B1_D0004.tif" /></maths></entry><entry align="center"><i><o ostyle="single">A</o></i>•<i>B</i>•<i>C</i></entry></row></thead><tbody><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row><row><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0013<figref idref="f0004">Figure 6</figref> shows simulation results for the DC characteristics of the OR/NOR FCML gate. In this example, V<sub>DD</sub> is 1.8 volts, V<sub>SS</sub> is ground, and the current source has 0.1 mA flowing through it. Only one input, a DC level, is used in this simulation. As shown in the data, the outputs <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i> have a swing of approximately 0.4 volts from 1.4 to 1.8 volts. The output transition crossover point occurs at mid-range, 1.6 volts, of the required input voltage swing.
0014<figref idref="f0005">Figure 7</figref> shows simulation results of the transient response for the same circuit discussed in <figref idref="f0004">Figure 6</figref>. In this case, input <i>A</i> is low (0) and input <i>B</i> uses a pulse generator with amplitude varying from 1.4 to 1.8 volts. The rise and fall times for the two outputs, <i>O</i> and <i><o ostyle="single">O</o></i>, are shown. The abscissa represents time in nSeconds.
0015This family of gates is expected to find very broad usage. One example is in the phase-lock-loop (PLL) circuit of a cellular phone, according to an embodiment of the present invention, where multiple input gates operating in the GHz range are merged with other conventional circuit functions. <figref idref="f0006 f0007 f0008">Figures 8a-8e</figref> show an example of this application with the gates used as both D-type flip-flops and OR gate functions in a PLL prescaler circuit according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
0016<figref idref="f0006">Figure 8a</figref> is the schematic diagram of a D-type flip-flop 28 used in the prescaler function of a cellular phone in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention. The input to this flip-flop consists of a 3-input FCML gate 14 merged with other functions in the flip-flop circuit. This identical 3-input flip-flop circuit 28, as well as another 2-input version of the same circuit 29 is used in the prescaler 31 function of the cellular phone, as shown below in <figref idref="f0007">Figure 8c</figref>.
0017<figref idref="f0006">Figure 8b</figref> shows the schematic for a 3-input FCML OR gate 14 used as the mode selection function 30, also in the prescaler circuit 31 of <figref idref="f0007">Figure 8c</figref>.
0018<figref idref="f0007">Figure 8c</figref> is the block diagram for a prescaler 31 in a cellular phone according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. As illustrated, this circuit merges three (3) of the FCML gates; (i) a 3-input D-type flip-flop 28, (ii) another 2-input D-type flip-flop 29, and (iii) a 3-input FCML OR gate 30 with other conventional circuitry in the prescaler circuit.
0019<figref idref="f0007">Figure 8d</figref> is a block diagram for a typical phase-lock-loop (PLL) circuit 32 used in a cellular phone according to the present invention. This shows how the prescaler 31, with the FCML gates, is used in the loop.
0020<figref idref="f0008">Figure 8e</figref> is a typical block diagram for a cellular phone showing the receiver and transmitter RF/IF portions, the baseband controller functions, the power supply, and the user input/output functions. Of particular interest relative to this invention is the phase-lock-loop (PLL) 32 circuit. In a typical cellular phone there may be 2 or 3 phase-lock-loops involved. As discussed above, each of these phase-lock-loops has at least three (3) high speed gate circuits which can be enhanced through the use of the high-speed, low-voltage FCML gates described herein. And while a single analog/digital baseband is shown, a cellular phone could also use separate analog and digital basebands.
0021While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be modified in numerous ways and may assume many embodiments other than that specifically set out and described above.
Contents5
12 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB2310342A | Cites | United Kingdom | Examiner |
| US5519887A | Cites | United States of America | Examiner |
| EP0436823A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | – |
| GB2310342A | Cites | United Kingdom | – |
| US5055800A | Cites | United States of America | – |
| US5077764A | Cites | United States of America | – |
| US5514982A | Cites | United States of America | – |
| US5519887A | Cites | United States of America | – |
| US5581214A | Cites | United States of America | – |
| US5945848A | Cites | United States of America | – |
| REIN ET AL: "improved feedback ecl gate with low -delay power product for the subnanosecond region" IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, vol. sc12, no. 1, February 1977 (1977-02), pages 80-82, XP002126556 New york | Non-patent | – | – |
10 members in 5 offices; this record represents the family
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114780 | United States of America | – | |
| 11478098 | United States of America | A |
Members10
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP0973262A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| JP2000049590A | Japan | A | |
| EP0973262A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| US6265898B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| US2002089353A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US6492840B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| EP0973262B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT442704T | Austria | T | |
| ATE442704T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE69941383D1 | Germany | D1 |
50 legal events, as 6 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents actLapsedNLV1 | NLV1 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| European patents granted designating irelandGrantedFG4D | FG4D | IE | |
| European patent takes effect as a national patent in ch/liEP | EP | CH | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Designated contracting states (corrected)RBV | RBV | EP | |
| Designated contracting states (corrected)RBV | RBV | EP | |
| Designation fees paidDE FR GB IT NLAKX | AKX | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SIAX | AX | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant7H 03K 19/086 A, 7H 03K 19/094 B, 7H 03L 7/193 B, 7H 03K 23/66 BRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SIAX | AX | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0973262
- Application
- 992022616
Titles3
- German
- Logische Schaltung in Stromschaltertechnik
- English
- Current mode logic circuit
- French
- Circuit logique fonctionnant en mode de commutation de courant
Classification
- CPC, 2
- H03K19/086
- H03K19/09432
- IPC, 6
- H03K19 086
- H03K19 094
- H03L7 193
- H03K23 66
- H03K19 0944
- H03K19 20
Designated states19
- Contracting states, 19
- Austria
- Belgium
- Switzerland
- Cyprus
- Germany
- Denmark
- Spain
- Finland
- France
- United Kingdom
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Liechtenstein
- Luxembourg
- Monaco
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Portugal
- Sweden
