Ion beam control system
12 claims: 3 independent, 9 dependent
- 1A method for forming an ion beam (14) comprising the steps of:a) creating a plasma of ions within a region bounded by a wall (32) having multiple exit apertures (30) therein;b) extracting ions from within the region by creating an electric field in the vicinity of the exit apertures (30) for accelerating ions which exit through the apertures (30) to form multiple beam segments (14a);characterised in that the multiple beam segments (14a) are combined to form the ion beam (14);and by the step of: c) attracting charge neutralization particles from the ion beam segments (14a) as ions exit the apertures (30) to attenuate selected ones of the beam segments (14a) and control the ion beam intensity as a function of position within the ion beam (14).
- 4An ion source comprising:a) source means (10) for creating ions within a confined region and including a wall (32) bounding the confined region having multiple exit apertures (30) that allow ions to exit the confined region and form ion beam portions (14a) ;and b) extraction means comprising a conductive extraction plate (12) maintained at an electric potential for attracting ions from the source means (10) ;characterised in that said ion beam portions (14a) are combined to form an ion beam (14) having a beam cross section greater than that of the individual beam portions (14a);and said conductive extraction plate (12) includes multiple extraction apertures (34) generally aligned with the multiple exit apertures (30) in the wall (32) of said source means (10);and by c) intensity control means (40, 50a, 50b, 50c) for extracting electrons from beam portions (14a) in the region of the conductive extraction plate (12) to control beam density across the cross section of the ion beam (14).
- 7An ion implantation system comprising:a) an ion source means (10) having multiple exit apertures (30) for forming a plurality of beam portions (14a);b) analysing means (16) for analysing ions from the ion source and for directing certain ions to follow a wafer treatment trajectory;and c) a wafer treatment station for placing wafers in a position to intercept said certain ions after ions exit the analysing means (16);characterised in that the ion beam portions (14a) are combined to form an ion beam (14) having a cross section greater than the individual beam portions (14a), and by d) ion distribution control means (12, 36, 40, 50a, 50b, 50c) including a plurality of spaced electrodes (40, 50a, 50b, 50c) for selectively deneutralising charge in at least some of the ion beam portions (14a);and e) switching means (62, 80, 81, 82) coupled to the ion distribution control means (12, 36, 40, 50a, 50b, 50c) for individually controlling biasing potentials of the spaced electrodes (40, 50a, 50b, 50c) to provide a controlled ion distribution of ions impacting a wafer surface (22) at the wafer treatment station.
Independent claims3
39 paragraphs, as filed
Technical Field
The present invention relates to an ion source and an ion implantation system incorporating the ion source.
Background Art
Ion beam treatment of workpieces such as silicon wafers for manufacture of semiconductor material is well-known in the prior art. Charged ions are created and accelerated to a specific velocity and caused to impinge upon a workpiece such as a silicon wafer. The prior art techniques for doping silicon wafers to produce semiconductor material are broadly divided into two classes of implanters.
High dose implanters typically use an ion source and focusing components for directing a high current ion beam along a specified travel path. At an implant zone or station, the workpiece to be implanted is mechanically moved through the high current ion beam in a controlled fashion to achieve uniform ion beam treatment of the workpiece. A U.S. prior art patent assigned to the Eaton Corporation which discloses and describes such a high current ion implantation system is U.S. Patent No. 4,234,797 to Ryding.
A second broad class of ion implantation systems use less intense ion beams which can be controllably deflected away from an initial trajectory to impinge upon different zones or areas at an implantation station. This type of lower intensity system also includes an ion beam source and focusing components for directing an ion beam along a specified trajectory. Along this trajectory, however, are positioned electric field creating electrodes which are energized in a controlled manner to deflect the ion beam away from the initial trajectory to the workpiece, typically a silicon wafer used in semiconductor manufacture. By controlling the voltage on the scanning electrodes, a uniform pattern of ion doping of the silicon wafer can be achieved. A representative U.S. patent disclosing a low current ion implantation system is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,736,107 to Myron which is also assigned to the Eaton Corporation.
Each of the two broad classes of ion implantation systems have advantages and disadvantages. The high current ion beam implantation technique has generally resulted in reduced wafer throughput and required large, costly wafer handling stations to move the wafer through the ion beam.
Deflection scanning systems used with lower current ion bean implantation have advantages in size and Simplicity but cannot be used with high currents because the deflecting electric field results in beam deneutralization and consequent beam blow-up. They also suffer a disadvantage due to the varying angle of beam incidence the ions impinge upon the wafer. This varying angle of incidence is due to the electrode scanning of the ion beam side to side across the surface of the silicon wafer.
1 FR-A-2316724 discloses an ion implanter including an ion source having a multi-aperture source electrode. A plurality of ion beams produced by the source are focused onto a target. The plurality of beams are not merged together to produce a single beam.
Disclosure of the Invention
It would thus be desirable to provide an implantation system that combines the advantages of low and high current ion beam implanters and avoids some of the disadvantages of each type of implanter.
There is thus provided a method for forming an ion beam comprising the steps of: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>a) creating a plasma of ions within a region bounded by a wall having multiple exit apertures therein;</li><li>b) extracting ions from within the region by creating an electric field in the vicinity of the exit apertures for accelerating ions which exit through the apertures to form multiple beam segments; characterised in that the multiple beam segments are combined to form the ion beam; and by the step of:</li><li>c) attracting charge neutralization particles from the ion beam segments as ions exit the apertures to attenuate selected ones of the beam segments and control the ion beam intensity as a function of position within the ion beam.</li></ul>
There is further provided an ion source comprising: <ul id="ul0002" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>a) source means for creating ions within a confined region and including a wall bounding the confined region having multiple exit apertures that allow ions to exit the confined region and form ion beam portions; and</li><li>b) extraction means comprising a conductive extraction plate maintained at an electric potential for attracting ions from the source means; characterised in that said ion beam portions are combined to form an ion beam having a beam cross section greater than that of the individual beam portions; and said conductive extraction plate includes multiple extraction apertures generally aligned with the multiple exit apertures in the wall of said source means; and by</li><li>c) intensity control means for extracting electrons from beam portions in the region of the conductive extraction plate to control beam density across the cross section of the ion beam.</li></ul>
According to a further aspect there is provided an ion implantation system comprising: <ul id="ul0003" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>a) an ion source means having multiple exit apertures for forming a plurality of beam portions;</li><li>b) analysing means for analysing ions from the ion source and for directing certain ions to follow a wafer treatment trajectory; and</li><li>c) a wafer treatment station for placing wafers in a position to intercept said certain ions after ions exit the analysing means; characterised in that the ion beam portions are combined to form an ion beam having a cross section greater than the individual beam portions, and by</li><li>d) ion distribution control means including a plurality of spaced electrodes for selectively deneutralising charge in at least some of the ion beam portions; and</li><li>e) switching means coupled to the ion distribution control means for individually controlling biasing potentials of the spaced electrodes to provide a controlled ion distribution of ions impacting a wafer surface at the wafer treatment station.</li></ul>
An ion implantation system constructed in accordance with one aspect of the present invention includes an ion source for providing a plurality of ion beam portions which collectively form the workpiece implantation beam. The ion source creates ions within a region bounded by a wall having multiple exit apertures that emit ions. Ions from a particular exist aperture form a beam portion or "beamlet." Multiple beamlets combine to form an ion beam having a beam cross section greater than that of any beam portion. The combined cross section of the ion beam is preferably larger than the width of the workpiece being treated so that no beam or workpiece scanning is required.
An extraction plate is positioned in close proximity to the source and maintained at an electric potential which attracts ions from the source. The extraction plate defines multiple extraction apertures generally aligned with the multiple exit apertures of the source. An intensity control structure positioned near the extraction plate selectively extracts electrons from beam portions. Once a beam portion is deneutralized due to the extraction of the electrons it rapidly diffuses and is lost from the ion beam.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention multiple conductive rings for attracting electrons from the beamlets are located on an exit side of the extraction plate. The conductive rings are spaced from the extraction plate and are coupled to a source of energy by a conductive pattern deposited onto the isolation layer.
The energy source controls energization of each conductive ring to control the beam distribution across the beam cross section. This allows relatively uniform as well as controlled non-uniform ion implantation of a workpiece.
Brief Description of the Drawings
<ul id="ul0004" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>Figure 1 is a schematic depiction an ion implantation system;</li><li>Figure 2 is a section view showing an exit aperture and a portion of an extraction electrode for attracting ions from an ion source chamber;</li><li>Figure 3 is an elevation view of an exit side of an extraction plate for extracting ions from a source;</li><li>Figure 4 is an enlarged elevation view of a portion of an array of conductive rings that are deposited onto the Figure 3 extraction plate;</li><li>Figure 5 is a graph showing ion concentration as a function of position within one beam portion for a representative beam neutralization energization state; and</li><li>Figure 6 is a graph showing ion concentration as a function of position with a beam portion for an alternate beam neutralization energization state.</li></ul>
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
Turning now to the drawings, Figure 1 depicts an ion implantation system including a low energy (<sup>∼</sup>2kv) ion source 10 for emitting ions that are accelerated away from the source by an ion extraction electrode 12. The source 10 emits a plurality of small cross section beams that gradually lose their definition and diffuse as they move along a travel path. This diffusion allows individual beam portions or beamlets emitted from the source 10 to combine and form a beam 14 that is wider than any of the beam portions. The ion intensity within the cross section of the ion beam 14 is controlled by removing neutralizing electrons from a given beamlet before it diffuses into the combined beam 14.
The beam 14 passes through an analyzing or resolving magnet 16 where the ions in the beam are bent in a manner dependent upon their mass and charge. Downstream from the resolving magnet 16, the beam 14 enters a metallic resolving slit 18 that defines a beam waist in a dispersive plane. Those ions passing through the resolving slit 18 are further accelerated by two accelerating tubes 19, 20 which accelerate the ions to a desired energy level (between 5 and 200 kv) and project the beam onto a workpiece 22. The two accelerating tubes 19, 20 act as a telescope and by controlling the size of the accelerating energy and distance along the beam path between the two tubes 19, 20 the size and angle of beam impact on the workpiece 22 are controlled.
The wafer 22 is moved to and from a proper position and orientation in the ion beam 14 by automatic wafer handling apparatus. Since the beam 14 is in a highly evacuated chamber from the source to the region of the wafer 22, this apparatus must move the wafers from atmospheric to very low pressure. Apparatus for accomplishing this task is known in the prior art.
No wafer scanning at the implantation station is needed since the source 10 produces a beam 14 of large enough cross section to treat the implantation surface of the workpiece 22. Additionally, no scanning electrodes are needed and therefore the electronics needed to adjust the voltage on such electrodes are avoided.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the source 10 is a multi-aperture Kaufman-type source capable of producing ions having an energy of approximately 1 kilovolt and currents of approximately 10 milliamps per square centimeter. The specific source utilized in the embodiment shown in Figure 1 includes a 3 centimeter wide ion emitting area having 288 apertures arranged in the general shape of a hexagon with a total current capability of 70 milliamps.
In the merged beam technique depicted in Figure 1, the magnet 16 helps focus the individual beamlets forming the beam 14 into a single merged beam which is resolved through the single slit 18 and then accelerated as a single beam. Certain advantages accompany use of this merged beam technique over a technique where each of the beamlets are resolved and accelerated. The resolving magnet gap is kept small since the source 10 itself is smaller in cross section. The common resolving slit 18 is easier to accomplish than would be multiple slits, one for each individual beamlet. Resolving and ion acceleration are achieved more easily since duplicate acceleration electrodes for each beamlet are not needed. In addition, the simplicity of the post acceleration apparatus results in fewer surfaces to accumulate condensates.
Figure 2 depicts a representative one 30 of the 288 exit apertures in the array of exit apertures defined by an aperture defining wall 32 of the ion source 10. An ion plasma exists within a confines of the ion source 10 and ions within the plasma naturally migrate to the vicinity of the wall 32 and more particularly to the vicinity of exit apertures within the wall. The extraction electrode 12 is maintained at an electrical potential of -100 volts with respect to ground and creates an electric field in the vicinity of the source 10 (which is biased at a potential of approximately 5 kilovolts) to cause ions in the plasma to be accelerated through a region between the aperture electrode 12 and the source 10. This results in the formation of a beamlet 14a that combines with other beamlets to form the beam 14.
The extraction electrode 12 defines an array 50 of apertures (Figure 3) configured to align with the array of apertures formed in the source wall 32 and the electrode aperture 34 corresponding to the aperture 30 is shown in Figure 2. A silicon dioxide layer 36 is deposited on one surface of the extraction electrode 12 using thick film deposition techniques. In this way each opening or aperture in the extraction plate is made slightly wider by the presence of the silicon dioxide layer 36.
As seen most clearly in Figure 2, each of the openings defined by the extraction electrode is bounded by a control electrode or ring 40 which when energized attracts electrons within the beamlet 14a to create a net positive charge per unit volume within the beamlet. This results in a rapid destabilization of the beamlet due to repulsion between ions. This occurs within a very short distance downstream from the electrode 40 and results in a diminished contribution from the aperture 30 within the resultant ion beam 14.
As seen in Figure 3, the electrode array 50 surrounding the individual apertures in the extraction electrode 12 define a generally hexagon or six sided Figure. Each group of three rings 50a, 50b, 50c, for example, are electrically coupled together. A conductor 52 connects the three rings 50a,50b,50c to an energy source 60 (Figure 1). Under the control of a programmable control 62 the voltage source 60 periodically applies a voltage of +15 volts to each ring (115 volts above the -100 volt potential of the extraction electrode 12) grouping in a controlled sequence such that if a diminution of beam intensity at a particular region of the combined beam 14 is desired the ring grouping contributing to that portion of the ion beam is activated for longer time periods than other groupings within the array 50. In accordance with the preferred design, the programmable controller 62 executes a control program loaded from disk is used to adjust the energization times of various ring groupings within the array 50.
The rings and various buses depicted in Figures 3 and 4 are deposited onto the extraction electrode 54 using printed circuit deposition techniques well known in the prior art. Each ring 40 within the array 50 can be categorized by the conductor which transmits the ring's energization signals.
The electrodes or rings of the array 50 are divided into three portions. Each electrode portion is serviced by energization conductors that extend inward from radially outer portions of the extraction electrode 12. In combination the conductions coupled to each array portion form a bus. Thus, as seen in Figure 3, three buses 80, 81, 82, each of which includes multiple individual electric conductors deposited onto the silicon dioxide layer 36 in patterns that lead to the array 50. In a preferred design the source 60 of voltage is supplied by integrated circuits coupled to the extraction electrode 12 at locations 84, 85, 86. Appropriate energizing signals are derived from address information routed to the electrode through a connector that engages the electrode 12 at a location 87 and communicates with the programmable controller 62.
Although in the preferred design, three rings form a ring grouping which are all electrically energized at the same potential, individual control of individual rings within an array is also possible. Additionally, jumpers or conductive patterns can be utilized to coupled together ring groupings in the event less precise control over beam intensity is needed.
The effect of deneutralization of the space charged within an ion beamlet as on the maintainability of the beamlet is depicted in Figures 5 and 6. These two figures illustrate the ion density across a representation beamlet.
In Figure 5 a one dimensional trace 110 obtained by a raster scan process is depicted. Each spike (or small bump along portions of the trace 110) represents a line integral of the ion distribution along a line passing through the region of the beamlet. Large spikes pass through high concentrations of ions.
The series of concentric lines 112 in Figure 5 are derived from the raster scan data. It is in the form of a two dimensional contour map (as a topographic map). Contour lines of equal ion density are drawn and the center line has the highest density. The next contour line represents a region having 1/8 the first etc.
Figure 5 shows a tightly collimated beamlet, with the 1/2 maximum contour being approximately 1 cm in diameter. Figure 6 shows a widely scattered beamlet, caused by electron extraction, with contour lines spread across several centimeters, beyond the area covered by the scanning device. These beamlet cross-section ion density measurements were taken at a distance 15 cm from the extraction aperture 34 (Figure 2). This implies a 1/2 angle divergence of about 2 degrees in the case of Figure 5, and in excess of 10 degrees in the case of Figure 6.
The utilization of a large cross sectional source which produces multiple beamlets results in a non-scanning, non-deflecting ion beam system for ion implantation of a workpiece. While a preferred embodiment of the invention has been described, it is the intent that the invention cover modifications from this embodiment falling within the scope of the appended claims.
4 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4
Every citation, both waysCites: the store holds 4 of 5
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US7442946B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP0106497A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | – |
| EP0167360A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | – |
| EP0230290A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | – |
| FR2316724A | Cites | France | – |
| PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 13, no. 232 (E-765)(3580) 29 May 1989 & JP-A-1 038 959 | Non-patent | – | – |
19 members in 5 offices
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 487158 | United States of America | – | |
| 48715890 | United States of America | A | |
| 487158 | – | – | – |
| US19900487158 | – | – | – |
Members19
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4914305A | United States of America | A | |
| EP0377298A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| KR900012339A | Republic of Korea | A | |
| JPH02226645A | Japan | A | |
| EP0377298A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| US5023458A | United States of America | A | |
| EP0444935A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP0444935A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| JPH04230942A | Japan | A | |
| EP0377298B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE68916776D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE68916776T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| KR960003496B1 | Republic of Korea | B1 | |
| EP0444935B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| KR960014524B1 | Republic of Korea | B1 | |
| DE69122526D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE69122526T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| JP2873704B2 | Japan | B2 | |
| JP2946433B2 | Japan | B2 |
29 legal events, as 3 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| European patent in force as of 2002-01-01IF02 | IF02 | GB | |
| Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)732E | 732E | GB | |
| Transmission of propertyTP | TP | FR | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRAGRAH | GRAH | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRAGRAH | GRAH | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0444935
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0444935
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0444935
- Application
- 91301654
- Application, DOCDB
- 91301654
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19910301654
Titles3
- German
- Ionenstrahl-Steuersystem
- English
- Ion beam control system
- French
- Système de commande d'un faisceau d'ions
Classification
- CPC, 2
- H01J37/08
- H01J37/3172
- IPC, 5
- C23C14 48
- H01J27 02
- H01J37 08
- H01J37 317
- H01L21 265
Designated states1
- Contracting states, 1
- Italy
