A method and arrangement for channel monitor and control.

Description of equivalent WO 8911126 A1

A METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR CHANNEL MONITOR AND CONTROL

10 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of radio transport of alphanumeric messages to and from remote units and at least one base station, and specifically to a method and means for coordinating inbound transmissions

15 to the base station wherein collisions between coded messages and acknowledgments on an inbound channel to the base station are minimized. The present application is related to the instant assignee's U.S. Patent No. 4,646,082 issued February 24, 1987, entitled "Inbound

20 Acknowledgment Stack" and invented by James R. Engel, et al.

Portable Data terminal systems have been developed for providing data message communications over a conventional radio frequency (RF) link in order to couple 25 remote units, or terminals, to at least one base station, and ultimately to a host computer, to provide operational command and control for a public service agency or the like. Such RF communication systems typically operate on two channels, namely, an inbound channel and an outbound

30 channel to the base station. Thus, although the remote units typically operate in half-duplex mode by transmitting on the inbound channel to the base station and receiving on the outbound channel, the base station

35 transmits on its outbound channel and receives on its inbound channel by utilizing a full-duplex mode.

The operation of this type of system is sequenced and controlled from the fixed end by a "system controller". This system controller organizes and generates the various outbound transmissions which generally include at least a header and a coded message as a single packet of information over the operating channel of the system. Each remote unit that receives an outbound transmission from the base station is generally required to send an acknowledgment (ACK) . The base station will repeat its message to the various remote units until an ACK has been received.

One known improvement utilizes an imbedded inhibit signal in the outbound transmission to prevent other remote units from beginning a possibly interfering transmission when one is in progress. A second known improvement is the Inbound Acknowledgment Stack which is effective in preventing the simultaneous transmission of acknowledgment signals after a period of a relatively long inhibit. In implementing such a method and arrangement, several difficulties are introduced which increase the likelihood that collisions will occur in such a contention RF communications system. The first problem is that when two or more remote units are transmitting simultaneously, at least one, and often both, inbound transmissions are lost.

A second type of difficulty with the prior art system is the inordinately long delay encountered before transmitting an inbound message when the status of the outbound channel is unknown.

A third type of difficulty occurs while waiting for frame sync, namely, bunching of messages which causes an increase in collisions, both of the message-message type and of the message-ACK type. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method and means for preventing mutual interference for collisions among inbound transmissions of any type, whether coded messages or ACKs to received messages.

It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method and means to improve system reliability by insuring that a prescribed remote unit transmits its ACK in a unique time slot and that other remote units are prevented from transmitting their coded messages preceded by a header in the ACK unique time slots, so that essage-ACK collisions are virtually eliminated and message-message collisions are significantly reduced by eliminating message queue build-up during the wait for frame sync.

Briefly described, the present invention contemplates a method and means which are activated whenever a remote unit operator attempts to send an inbound transmission by hitting his push-to-talk (PTT) switch, or whenever the base station transmitter is transmitting. Each remote unit makes a sequence of decisions, including whether there is a delay, whether the base station transmitter is transmitting, and determining an inhibit state based upon an imbedded inhibit signal and information in the header to a coded message before transmitting on the inbound channel to the base station. This inhibit state prevents all of the other communication units from transmitting while a prescribed communication unit or remote unit transmits a message or an acknowledgment (ACK) so that collisions between messages and ACKs or between one ACK and another ACK are avoided. Message-message collisions are substantially reduced since the method causes a remote unit to utilize a random delay before attempting a retry to send the message a second time. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Eig. 1 is a block diagram of an RF communication system for exchanging data in the form of coded messages that may advantageously utilize the present invention. 5 Fig. 2 is a timing diagram showing an outbound transmission that includes two messages, each preceded by a header.

Fig. 2B is a timing diagram showing the relationship between:; transmitted messages, inhibit state, and a IDC s- j333q ejrt acknowledgment (ACK) .

Fig. 2C is a timing diagram showing the relationship between transmitted messages, inhibit state, and a subsequent ACK 1 following the end of an inbound message as related back to the timing diagram of Fig. 2A. 15 Fig. 3 is another timing diagram showing the relationship between transmitted messages, inhibit state, and a plurality of subsequent. ACKs.

Fig. 4 is a flow diagram detailing the operation of the method of the present invention. 20 Fig. 5 is an expanded block diagram of the remote units depicted in Fig. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to Fig. 1, there is shown a block

25 diagram of an RF communication system of the type which may advantageously utilize the present invention. This typje≥. cf: system includes a plurality of communication uni±SΞ and transmits alphanumeric data in the form of coded!messages between a primary station, such as a base

30 station (102) through an antenna (104) and via a communications medium, such as an RF channel.

A second base station (106) may be included in the system which couples to an antenna (107) , to provide redundancy for improved reliability when co-located with

35 the base station (102) , or it may be located away from the base station (102) in order to expand the coverage area to a larger geographical area. System controller (108) may be part of the base station or may be utilized separately to coordinate the operation between base station (102) and optional base station (106) . The plurality of communication units comprise a plurality of remote units (110, 112, and 114), each of which utilizes a small antenna (116) incorporated therein to communicate with the base station (102) as shown. During any given instant in time, the base station (102) sends an outbound transmission, represented : by the numeral 118 and receives a single inbound transmission, represented by the numeral 120.

Base station (102) includes at least a receiver, a channel communications module (CCM) , and a transmitter (105) . Such equipment already exists and is available as Motorola MSF-5000 base station which includes a CCM having a Motorola GCC-480 therein. For systems having more than one base station, the system controller (108) is available as a Motorola NCP-500 or NCP-3000.

Remote units (110, 112, and 114) are available from Motorola in a variety of models, including KDT-440, KDT-

460 and KDT-840. These and the aforementioned Motorola models and corresponding instruction manuals may be obtained from Motorola C & E Parts, 1303 East Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60196. Many of the above : elements are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,646,082 to Engel, et al., issued February 24, 1987 and assigned to the assignee of the present application. The material described in the above U.S. patent is incorporated herein by reference. Although the above system has been described in terms of the arrangement depicted in Fig. 1, the system may optionally be configured according to that shown in Fig.. 2 of issued U.S. Patent No. 4,646,082, and this configuration is also incorporated herein by reference. According to an important feature of the present RF communication system, whether in the context of a data only system or both data and analog signals together. each of the remote units receives an outbound transmission from the base station and replies with an acknowledgment (ACK) or a coded message on an inbound transmission that includes a header and a coded message. The various combinations and situations of signals occurring over time can best be seen by turning to the various timelines given in Fig. 2.

Referring now to Fig. 2A, an outbound transmission is depicted along a timeline (202) that has a sequence of two messages, each preceded by a header. Note that within the header and coded message #1 (MES. 1) there exists a periodically recurring, imbedded inhibit signal within the bracket labelled imbedded inhibit bits. These "tick" marks represent approximate time occurrences of these bits, whether they are digital ones (1) or zeroes CO).

The inhibit state bits (ISBs) are imbedded in the coded message following the header and may be imbedded in part or in all of the header. The preferred embodiment utilizes an input data buffer in which all of the incoming bits are serially entered in ascending order into a (7 x 16) matrix to the extent of the variable duration of a given coded message: b]_, b2, ... ^B15' ^D16 <img file="WO8911126A1_D0001.tif" />

B47, b48 <img file="WO8911126A1_D0002.tif" />

B7₉, bgo <img file="WO8911126A1_D0003.tif" /> b₉₇, b₉₈^Blll'^b112

Those bits identified by capital letters, above, are reserved for the ISBs, of which the three latest received ISBs are utilized in the preferred embodiment of the present invention. All (l)s indicate inbound channel activity, all (0)s indicate inbound channel inactivity, and any mixture of (l)s and (0)s indicate an indefinite state of activity. Other arrangements could be utilized.

Two pointers are utilized within the above matrix, namely the input data buffer pointer to locate where the next data byte is to be stored, and the ISB pointer that

5 points to the last of the latest three ISBs.

Next, Fig. 2B shows an inhibit state represented by block Tj along a timeline (204) . As will be seen in a moment, this inhibit state is based upon the imbedded inhibit signal and information in the header within a

ID: given outbound transmission, such as depicted in Fig. 2A, above. During this inhibit state, T]_, all of the plurality of remote units, except for the one acknowledging the message #1, are inhibited, while the prescribed remote unit #1 to whom the message is

15 addressed acknowledges the receipt of that message as shown by the inbound transmission block labelled ACK depicted on the timeline (206) .

Thus, it should be evident that remote unit #1 is sending an acknowledgment back to the base station upon 0 receipt of message #1 from the base station in the absence of any inbound transmission currently in process to the base station. Moreover, information is included in the header to indicate the length of message #1 to all of the remote units in order that a block of time greater 5 than the duration of the anticipated ACK can be reserved as early as the point in time represented by B.

Next, Fig. 2C depicts a different situation in which the inhibit state is extended and begins earlier in time, as represented by point H on the inhibit state timeline 0 (208) . As such, this inhibit state remains on past the point labelled D through time interval Ti' and ending at the point labelled M. This extended inhibit state occurs for the situation where an inbound message is detected by the base station and the imbedded inhibit 5 signal in the outbound transmission, in turn, alerts the remote units so as not to transmit until the conclusion of this inbound message, and further to allow for the anticipated acknowledgement ACK 1 shown on the inbound transmission timeline (210) . In each of the above situations, namely that depicted in Fig. 2C and Fig. 2B, like reference letters are utilized for like points in time corresponding back to the outbound transmission timeline (202) depicted in Fig. 2A.

Yet another situation is depicted in Fig. 3 in which a sequence of many messages are sent sequentially in an outbound, transmission, as depicted on timeline (302). " <img file="WO8911126A1_D0004.tif" /> gxven that an inbound message exists, the inhibit- state- will have been activated ON, as shown on timeline (304) and will also include an additional time period T2 that ends at the point labelled R. For this situation, the inbound transmissions received by the base station will include an inbound message ending at the point labelled J followed by an inhibit release delay time extending to the point labelled D, after which the plurality of ACKs anticipated to be sent as a result of the multitude of messages 1-N, will be sent in a sequence such as is shown for ACK2 followed by ACK1 which ends before the point in time labelled R.

Thus, this situation depicts a stack interval that is created at the end of the inbound transmission to the base station so that a time slot is reserved for an ACK from the second remote unit and an adjacent time slot is reserved for an ACK from the first remote unit without collisions.

Turning next to Fig. 4, a flowchart is shown of the decisions required to be made within the remote unit to enable transmission. Beginning at block (402) , the operator wishes to transmit a message and hits his PTT switch, which then initiates a decision in block (404) . Block (404) represents the step of checking whether an initial delay has been set to prohibit transmission for a ^" prescribed delay duration. Such prescribed delay may be due to a random delay or various other delays as will be seen in a moment. - 9 -

If there is a delay, the method proceeds to wait until this delay is over, as represented in block (406) . When this delay is over, the method proceeds to check again whether there are any new delays since the last

5 time it checked, as represented by the return path (407) . If there are no further delays encountered in block (404) , the method proceeds to check whether the base station is transmitting as represented in block (408) . If the base station is not transmitting, then the method

10. assumes that there are no current inbound transmissions and^" therefore authorizes this prescribed remote unit to be allowed to transmit, as represented by block (410) . If, however, the base station is transmitting, as determined in block (408) , the method next determines an

15 inhibit state based upon the inhibit signal or inhibit state bits, as represented in block (412) . In making this determination, the method determines the inhibit state by looking at the latest three inhibit state bits to determine if they are all equal to zero. If this is

20 so, then the method allows this prescribed remote unit to transmit, as represented at block (410) .

If the inhibit state bits are not all logical 0, as determined in block (412) , then the method next checks these inhibit state bits to determine if they are all 25 equal to a logical 1, as represented in block (414) . If the determination is YES, the method proceeds to abide by a random delay which may be of a prescribed duration anywhere between 0 and 1.5 seconds, as represented in block (416) . Upon completing this delay, the method 0 begins again at the starting point as represented by return line (407) .

If, however, the determination in decision block (414) was NO, then the method delays allowing the remote unit: to transmit until the next inhibit state bit has 5 been- received, as represented in block (418) , and then returns via return path (407) to begin the four step decision process again. Various other delays may be utilized that ensure that any existing ACK interval has finished before another transmission is allowed. These delays may be of a predetermined or random length.

Finally, Fig. 5 depicts an expanded block diagram of a typical remote unit, such as remote unit (110) . As shown, it includes a receiver (501) , a microcomputer (502) and various interface ports for handling input and output data signals. Included are transmitter filter (506) , receiver filter (508) and limiter (510) , and an fi^EC (analog-tα-digital) converter (512) . A transmitter key control line is also shown coupled to an included transmitter (514) , which couples to a transmit-receive switch (516) which couples to an included antenna (116) as well as to the receiver (501) .

In summary, a method and means for controlling transmissions among a plurality of communication units has been described that determines an inhibit state based upon an inhibit signal and information in the header before transmitting. This inhibit state prevents all of the other remote units from transmitting while a prescribed remote unit transmits a message or an acknowledgment (ACK) so that collisions between messages and ACKs, or between one ACK and another, are avoided. Message-message collisions are substantially reduced since the method causes a remote unit to utilize a random delay before attempting a retry to send the message a second time. Accordingly, other uses and modifications will be obvious to one skilled in art without departing from the scope of the present invention.