Method and device for directional detection of a fault on a power transmission line
4 claims: 1 independent, 3 dependent
- 1Method for directional detection of a fault on a power transmission line located between two stations (P, Q) included in a multi-phase distribution or transmission system with measuring in at least one of the stations, in each phase, the current (i R , is, i T ) and the voltage (u R , u s , uT) and supplying the measured values to a travelling wave model (1) by means of which the voltage distribution along the line is obtained, characterized in that Δu 0pq is generated as the difference between a change in the zero sequence voltage, calculated with the aid of the travelling wave model, between two consecutive half-periods/periods in station Q and the corresponding change in the zero sequence voltage in station P, Δu RSpq is generated as the difference between a change in the principal voltage, calculated with the aid of the travelling wave model, between phases R and S between two consecutive half-periods/periods in station Q and the corresponding change in the principal voltage in station P, Δu STpq is generated as the difference between a change in the principal voltage, calculated with the aid of the travelling wave model, between phases S and T between two consecutive half-periods/periods in station Q and the corresponding change in the principal voltage in station P. Δu TRpq is generated as the difference between a change in the principal voltage, calculated with the aid of the travelling wave model, between phases T and R between two consecutive half-periods/periods in station Q and the corresponding change in the principal voltage in station P, that a fault lying ahead (FF) is indicated when Δu 0pq is greater than u 0d or when either Δu RSpq , Δu STpq or Δu TRpq is greater than u d , where u 0d and u d are selected levels of detection, and that a fault lying behind (BB) is indicated when Δupq is smaller than -u 0b or when either Δu RSpq , Δu STpq or Δu TRpq is smaller than - Ub , where -u 0b and u b are selected levels of detection.
61 paragraphs, as filed
The invention relates to a method for directional detection of a fault on a power transmission line according to the precharacterising part of Claim 1. The invention also relates to a device for carrying out the method.
It is important to protect components included in power or transmission networks, such as power lines, busbars, transformators etc. One duty of such protection is to find out in which direction, in relation to two or more measuring points, a fault has occurred. This kind of protection is called directional comparison protection. In this connection the term "zone of supervision" of a protection device is used, and an internal fault is defined as a fault which lies within the zone of supervision of the protection device. A fault which lies outside the zone of supervision and which can be detected is consequently called an external fault. Starting from a measuring point, directional detection can also be obtained, and in that connection the term "a fault lying ahead" is used when referring to a fault occurring in the direction of supervision of the protection device, and the term "a fault lying behind" is used when referring to a fault occurring in the opposite direction.
When a fault occurs in a power transmission network, travelling waves arise which move along the transmission line. It is known to use the direction of movement of these travelling waves at a measuring point to determine the direction to the location of the fault. US-A-3,956,671 discloses a method utilizing the fact that in those travelling waves, which move in from a fault point towards the measuring point of the protection device, the current and voltage waves have different signs. If the voltage is designated u, the current i and the wave impedance Z<sub>o</sub>, the equation u = Z<sub>o</sub>i is obtained in the case of an internal fault and a fault lying ahead, respectively. If the fault is located behind the measuring point, the current and voltage waves have the same signs, whereby the equation u = Z<sub>o</sub>i is obtained.
US-A-4,351,011 discloses an alternative method in which, instead of treating the voltage and current waves separately, the product of voltage and current is formed, i.e. the power or its integral, i.e. the energy. The direction to a fault can then be determined by the sign of the instantaneous power or energy change. For an internal fault or a fault lying ahead, a negative sign is then obtained on the power or energy change, and for an external fault or a fault lying behind, a positive sign is obtained.
In DE-A-28 41 009, the different algebraical combinations of the voltage and current waves are utilized for obtaining directional detection.
In EP-A-85 10 7101, a method and a device are described for locating a fault point on a transmission line based on voltage waves moving from a measuring point towards a fault point and corresponding waves reflected from a fault point, which waves are included in a travelling wave model of the line. The method comprises carrying out, at certain regular time intervals, a measurement of the instantaneous values of the current and the voltage at the end point of the line, for example at a station. With these values and with the aid of the travelling wave model, the voltage at a number of control points along the line can be calculated. It is the travelling wave model described in that application that forms the basis of the directional detection according to the present invention.
The aforementioned problem is solved by the characterizing features related to Claims 1 and 3.
The invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings showing - by way of example - in <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li>Figure 1 a power transmission line in a faultless state between two stations P and Q which are supplied from two power sources A and B,</li><li>Figure 2 the real, measured voltage distribution along the line according to Figure 1 between the power sources,</li><li>Figure 3 the same voltage distribution as Figure 2, in which the voltage consists of values calculated with a travelling wave model located at P, based on voltage and current values measured at P,</li><li>Figure 4 the same power transmission line as Figure 1 with a fault F having occurred between station P and power source A,</li><li>Figure 5 the real voltage distribution along the faulty line according to Figure 4,</li><li>Figure 6 the voltage distribution along the line calculated by a travelling wave model at P in the case of a fault according to Figure 4,</li><li>Figure 7 the same power transmission line as Figure 1, with a fault F located between P and Q,</li><li>Figure 8 the measured voltage distribution along the line after the occurrence of a resistance ground fault at F,</li><li>Figure 9 the voltage distribution along the line calculated by a travelling wave model at P in the case of a fault according to Figure 7,</li><li>Figure 10 an embodiment of a device for carrying out the method according to the invention,</li><li>Figure 11 a method for generating a mean value.</li></ul>
Figure 1 shows a power transmission line between two stations or measuring points P and Q. In the example shown, the line is connected to two power sources A and B. PQ may be conceived to be a transmission line between two networks A and B, a line in a meshed network or a line connecting a power station A with a power drain B.
Figure 2 shows the real voltage distribution along the line in a faultless state, E<sub>A</sub> and E<sub>B</sub> being the emf's of the respective power sources, and U'p and U'a being the voltage measured at P and at Q, respectively.
With the aid of current and voltage values measured in the stations P and Q, the control voltages or the voltage distribution from P and Q along the line and from Q towards P in a faultless state can be calculated by means of the travelling wave model described in the above-mentioned EP-A-85 10 7101 (see Figure 3). This means that the same voltage distribution as in Figure 2 is obtained within the limits determined by errors in measurement in measured value transformers and by uncertain parameter knowledge.
When a fault occurs on a line, it is important, as stated above, to be able to determine the direction to the fault. This is done by means of so-called directional detectors. In the directional detectors comprised by this invention, the control voltages which may be obtained with the aid of the travelling wave model are utilized.
By studying the change in the control voltages in that point which corresponds to the measuring point and that point which lies at the opposite end point of the line, the direction to the fault can be determined. This comparison can be made by using phase voltages, principal voltages, zero sequence voltages or other symmetrical components.
A fault which occurs in some part of the network connected to the measuring point of the protected line, for example at F according to Figure 4, propagates as a voltage wave along the line. The changes occurring in the control voltages can first be indicated in that control voltage which corresponds to the voltage at the measuring point or possibly in a symbolic control voltage behind the measuring point, viewed from the line. Then the change is propagated to the control voltages which are located further out on the line. The change of the control voltages occurs in a chronological order which is dependent on the direction of movement of the change on the line. The change is instantaneous in magnitude and the smaller in amplitude the further out on the line it occurs. This makes it possible to detect the direction by comparison of instantaneous values or mean values for a suitably selected period of time.
The real voltage distribution along the line in the case of a fault F between A and P is clear from Figure 5. The calculated distribution of the control voltage along the line is clear from Figure 6. Voltages indexed with p designate the voltage at the measuring point P and voltages indexed with q designate the voltage at Q. From Figure 5 it is clear that if |ΔUq| - | ΔUp <0, there is a fault on the station side of P, that is, a fault lying behind.
In the event of a fault on the line, for example at F according to Figure 7, the mathematical model in the protection device is valid for the distance to the fault point. Owing to the fact that the evaluation takes place with a lag corresponding to the transit time of the voltage waves from one end to the other end of the protected line, a change in the control voltages of the model will only be discovered in the control voltage corresponding to the remote end point or a fictitious voltage in an imaginary extension of the line. The magnitude of the change will also be instantaneous and greatest in amplitude at the remotest control point.
The real voltage distribution in the case of a fault according to Figure 7 is clear from Figure 8. The corresponding model voltage is clear from Figure 9, from which it is also clear that when |ΔUq| - |ΔU<sub>p</sub> <0, there is a fault on the line side of P, that is, a fault lying ahead.
A comparison between the changes of the control voltages, which may also include the change caused by a zero sequence or negative sequence voltage occurring in the case of unsymmetrical faults - both their consecutive occurrence in time and their different instantaneous values or mean values - provides a very reliable directional detection of the voltage waves which are propagated on the line from the location of the fault.
The invention relates to a method for checking and evaluating changes in the control voltages in the event of a fault for directional detection and phase selection, i.e. for determining a faulty phase or faulty phases. This can be carried out as an inspection of principal voltages, phase voltages and the zero sequence voltage. If, for example, a single-phase fault occurs in phase R, no change in the voltage between S and T is obtained. A ground fault can be detected by studying the change of the zero sequence voltage and any unsymmetrical fault can be detected by studying the negative sequence voltage.
Directional detection and phase selection take place by generating the difference between the changes of the control voltages at the two end points of the line. Since the line can be assumed to have the same impedance for negative sequence as for positive sequence, the phase selection logic introduced in the system is valid.
The theoretical background of the invention will be described by way of a number of examples showing typical fault occurrences. The following analysis deals with stationary conditions, and Al designates a stationary fault current which is superimposed on the state prevailing before a fault.
The following designations are used: <ul id="ul0002" list-style="none"><li>Index p represents the quantities a the measuring point P, and index q represents the quantities at the opposite end of the transmission line. Δl is the current floating at the location of the fault. It is distributed such that K,Al is the positive sequence component, K<sub>2</sub>AI is the negative sequence component and K<sub>0</sub>Δl is the zero sequence component of the current at the measuring point P. The K-factors, i.e. the distribution factors for the respective component of the current at the fault point, depend on where the fault occurs. Z<sub>A1</sub>, Z<sub>A2</sub> and A<sub>AO</sub> are source impedances seen from the measuring point of the protection device. Z<sub>1</sub> and Z<sub>o</sub> are the impedances of the transmission line (Z<sub>2</sub> = Z<sub>1</sub>)<sub>'</sub> U' is the voltage prevailing at the measuring point prior to the occurrence of a fault.</li></ul>
For a single-phase ground fault in phase R, i.e. RN, the control voltage of the measuring point can be expressed as:<maths id="math0001" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0001.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0002" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0002.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0003" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0003.tif" /></maths>
The control voltage of the remote end point can be expressed as follows with the data of the measuring points:<maths id="math0004" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0004.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0005" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0005.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0006" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0006.tif" /></maths>
The voltage change at the measuring point during the first half-period after a fault is thus as follows:<maths id="math0007" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0007.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0008" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0008.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0009" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0009.tif" /></maths>and the corresponding voltage change at the remote end point is as follows:<maths id="math0010" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0010.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0011" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0011.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0012" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0012.tif" /></maths>
The zero sequence voltage, i.e., the sum voltage, is as follows:<maths id="math0013" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0013.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0014" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0014.tif" /></maths>
The following expression can be set:<maths id="math0015" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0015.tif" /></maths>
Provided that |Z<sub>0</sub> | >> (Z<sub>A0</sub> | or arg (Z<sub>AO</sub>) = arg (Z<sub>0</sub>), the increase of the sum voltage between the control points p and q in the line model can be written as follows:<maths id="math0016" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0016.tif" /></maths>where "+" relates to a fault lying ahead and "-" relates to a fault lying behind. It should be pointed out that K is a function of the fault point and thus has different values for faults laying ahead and faults lying behind.
In the same way, expressions for the change for the principal voltages along the line are derived:<maths id="math0017" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0017.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0018" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0018.tif" /></maths>and<maths id="math0019" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0019.tif" /></maths>
To sum up, for a single-phase ground fault, RN, lying ahead of the measuring point the following expressions are valid:<maths id="math0020" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0020.tif" /></maths>and for a single-phase fault RN lying behind, the following expressions are valid:<maths id="math0021" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0021.tif" /></maths>
Thus, a directional detection and a phase selection are obtained by means of this method.
For a two-phase short-circuit between the phase S and phase T the following result is obtained in the case of a fault lying ahead:<maths id="math0022" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0022.tif" /></maths>and the following result is obtained in the case of a fault lying behind:<maths id="math0023" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0023.tif" /></maths>
In the case of a two-phase ground fault, STN, the conditions for calculating the voltage changes will be somewhat more complex. However, it can be shown that in order to indicate how large a part of the fault current Δl at the measuring point is zero sequence current and negative sequence current, respectively, the zero sequence component K<sub>0</sub>Δl shown above must be multiplied by a factor C<sub>o</sub> and the negative sequence component K<sub>2</sub>AI shown above must be multiplied by a factor C<sub>2</sub>. In this<maths id="math0024" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0024.tif" /></maths>
Thus, the zero sequence component of the fault current Δl is X<sub>0</sub>C<sub>0</sub>Δl and the negative sequence component is K<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>Δl.
In this case the following is obtained<maths id="math0025" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0025.tif" /></maths>in the case of a fault lying ahead, while the following is obtained<maths id="math0026" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0026.tif" /></maths>in the case of a fault lying behind.
For a three-phase symmetrical fault the following is obtained<maths id="math0027" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0027.tif" /></maths>in the case of a fault lying ahead, while the following is obtained<maths id="math0028" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0028.tif" /></maths>in the case of a fault lying behind.
It can also be proved that it is possible to use the described method for determining direction in the case of a fault on series-compensated transmission lines and for other conceivable cases of fault.
The described voltage difference can be formed as<maths id="math0029" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0029.tif" /></maths>where T is the period. In a sampled system there is obtained, in similar manner, for the k<sup>th</sup> measurement per period<maths id="math0030" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0030.tif" /></maths>where N = T/At and where At = the time between the samples.
An additive filter, in the sense that N is determined with the aid of the zero passages of the preceding periods, can be used. In that case the influence of slow frequency changes upon oscillations is prevented.
The zero sequence quantities are generated as follows:<maths id="math0031" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0031.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0032" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0032.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0033" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0033.tif" /></maths>
For each principal voltage the following equations are formed:<maths id="math0034" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0034.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0035" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0035.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0036" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0036.tif" /></maths>
The indices "σ' and "<sub>P</sub>" appearing for the first time in equation (33), refer to phase voltages, while the index "ρσ' refers to principal voltages.
To obtain voltage values as representative as possible, some form of mean value generation should be resorted to.
An example of this is clear from the following:<maths id="math0037" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0037.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0038" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0038.tif" /></maths>
In summary, on the basis of the equations (20) and (21) it can be determined that a fault lying ahead exists when <sub>0pq</sub> is greater than a chosen level of detection u<sub>0d</sub> and when <o>Δu</o><sub>ρσpq</sub> is greater than a chosen level of detection u<sub>d</sub>. In a similar manner it can be determined that when <sub>pq</sub> is smaller than -u<sub>0b</sub>, i.e. a chosen level of detection u<sub>0b</sub>, and when <o>Δu</o><sub>ρσpq</sub> is smaller than -b<sub>b</sub>, i.e. a chosen level of detection u<sub>b</sub>, and when <o>Δu</o><sub>ρσpq </sub>is smaller than -u<sub>b</sub>, i.e. a chosen level of detection u<sub>b</sub>, then a fault lying behind exists. If the positive or negative values are, respectively, greater than or smaller than the levels of detection, a fault exists and then the directional detectors are to deliver a signal indicating this. For the further signal processing it is suitable to resort to Boolean quantities. On the basis of the shown examples of fault, it can be generally stated that when <o>Δuo</o><sub>pqk</sub> > u<sub>0d</sub>, a signal DO = 1 is obtained indicating a ground fault lying ahead, when Δu<sub>pqk</sub> < -u<sub>0b</sub>, a signal BO = 1 is obtained indicating a ground fault lying behind, when Δu<sub>ρσpqk</sub> > u<sub>d</sub>, a signal Dp<sub>o</sub> = 1 is obtained indicating a fault lying ahead, and when Δ<sub>uρσqk</sub> < -u<sub>b</sub>, a signal Bp<sub>e</sub> = 1 is obtained indicating a fault lying behind.
For determining a faulty phase, or faulty phases, in the case of a fault, equation (20) can be used as starting-point as well, from which it can be understood that a fault in phase R, called FR, is obtained when, expressed in Boolean terms, FR = DRS.<o>DST</o>.DTR.DO.
For a two-phase fault in the form of a short-circuit between the R- and S-phases, a fault in phase R shall, of course, also be indicated. The conditions are also clear from equation (20), which means that the complete phase selection for the faulty phase R is determined by<maths id="math0039" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0039.tif" /></maths>
The corresponding phase selection for faults in phase S and T can be derived in a simple manner as follows<maths id="math0040" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0040.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0041" num=""><img file="EP0241832B1_D0041.tif" /></maths>
A direction-detecting protection device with ancillary functions according to the invention can be designed as shown in Figure 10. Phase currents I<sub>R</sub>, Is and IT and phase voltages U<sub>R</sub>, U<sub>s</sub> and U<sub>T</sub> are supplied to a device, located at some measuring point, comprising a travelling wave model 1 of the type described above. With the aid of the supplied currents and voltages, the general travelling wave model can indicate the voltage at a number of control points 1 to n along the transmission line. What is necessary for the directional detection according to the invention are really only voltages at the control points P and Q. This means that a simplified version of the travelling wave model may also be used if it is only to be used in connection with directional detection.
Changes Au in the phase voltages of the control voltages are obtained by adding the voltage values of two consecutive half-periods. The time shift is obtained by means of the time delay elements 2-7 and the summation in the summation members 8-13. This part of the device corresponds to equation (28) or (29).
It would also be possible to form the voltage change Au by comparing the voltage values for one period with the corresponding values during the preceding period. The time delay elements 2-7 must then provide a displacement of time corresponding to the time T for one period. The voltage value for each period must then be formed as a mean value or some other characteristic measure of values during one period. To generate the difference, the time-shifted value must now be supplied to summation members with a negative sign. This process has not been illustrated in the figure.
In the summation members 14 and 15 the zero sequence quantities according to equations (30) and (31) are formed. The valve symbol in boxes 14 and 15- as well as other boxes in Figure 10- indicate that a rectification of the measured values takes place in connection with the summing up. If the negative sequence voltage shall be used for directional detection, this component can be obtained by a known type of negative sequence filter.
For each principal voltage the voltage difference | Δu<sub>ρσp</sub> | and | Δu<sub>ρσk</sub>| are generated in the summation members 16-21 in accordance with equations (33) and (34).
The difference between the difference voltages calculated at P and Q - i.e. as regards the zero sequence voltage Δu<sub>pq</sub> according to equation (32) and as regards the principal voltage Δu<sub>ρσpq</sub> according to equation (35) - is generated in the summation members 22, 23 and 24, 25, respectively. The integral sign in the summation members indicate that a generation of a mean value is performed in connection with the summation. Such a generation of mean value according to equation (36) or (37) may, for example, take place according to Figure 11.
In the comparison devices 26-33 according to Figure 10, the differences obtained are compared with the levels of detection u<sub>d</sub>, -u<sub>b</sub>, u<sub>0d</sub> and -u<sub>0b</sub>, mentioned in the description, from which Boolean signals are obtained in the form of a "1" when the positive values exceed the levels of detection and when the negative values are lower than the levels of detection, respectively. The signals obtained, identified as DTR, DRS, DST, BTR, BRS, BST, DO and BO, are then used for determining the direction to a fault, for phase selection logic and in the case of blocking.
The "OR"-element 34 is supplied with all the D-signals, i.e. DRS, DST, DTR and DO. When any of these consists of a "1", this means that there is a fault lying ahead, which leads to the output FF becoming "1", and the requisite measures for disconnection are initiated, e.g. sending a trip signal to the opposite station in a so-called permissive system.
In similar manner, all the B-signals, i.e. BRS, BST, BTS and BO, are supplied to an "OR"-element 35 and when any of the signals is activated, a signal BB is obtained for blocking the tripping of the circuit-breakers on the opposite side of the line in a so-called blocking system.
The phase selection logic according to the Boolean equations (38), (39) and (40) are executed by means of the "AND"-elements 36, 37, 38 and 39 with the outputs A, B, C and D and the "OR"-elements 40, 41 and 42. The respective signals FR, FS and FT indicate a fault in the respective phase and can, of course, also be used in connection with disconnection of a faulty phase.
As mentioned above, the generation of a mean value according to equations (36) and (37) can be performed with scheme according to Figure 11. The scheme as such is relatively trivial and consists of two time delay elements 43 and 44 and two summation members 45 and 46.
The components included in the device, such as travelling wave model, summation members, comparison members, time delay elements, etc., can be designed as more or less integrated solutions in analog or digital technique.
In addition to being alternatively formed in digital or analog technique, the travelling wave model may be a complete such model, whereby the voltage distribution along the entire transmission line can be obtained, or it may be a simplified variant, whereby only control voltages at P and Q are obtained.
44 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12 Sheet 13 Sheet 14 Sheet 15 Sheet 16 Sheet 17 Sheet 18 Sheet 19 Sheet 20 Sheet 21 Sheet 22 Sheet 23 Sheet 24 Sheet 25 Sheet 26 Sheet 27 Sheet 28 Sheet 29 Sheet 30 Sheet 31 Sheet 32 Sheet 33 Sheet 34 Sheet 35 Sheet 36 Sheet 37 Sheet 38 Sheet 39 Sheet 40 Sheet 41 Sheet 42 Sheet 43 Sheet 44
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office |
|---|---|---|
| EP0164711A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) |
| DE2841009A | Cites | Germany |
| US3956671A | Cites | United States of America |
| US4351011A | Cites | United States of America |
9 members in 6 offices
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8601565 | Sweden | A | |
| 8601565 | Sweden | – | |
| 8601565 | – | – | – |
| SE19860001565 | – | – | – |
Members9
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SE8601565D0 | Sweden | D0 | |
| SE8601565L | Sweden | L | |
| JPS62239814A | Japan | A | |
| EP0241832A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| SE452533B | Sweden | B | |
| US4731689A | United States of America | A | |
| EP0241832B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE3763510D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| CA1285644C | Canada | C |
26 legal events, as 3 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| European patent in force as of 2002-01-01IF02 | IF02 | GB | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| It: last paid annual feeITTA | ITTA | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0241832
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0241832
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0241832
- Application
- 87105038
- Application, DOCDB
- 87105038
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19870105038
Titles3
- English
- METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DIRECTIONAL DETECTION OF A FAULT ON A POWER TRANSMISSION LINE
- German
- Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung der Richtung eines Fehlers auf einer Leitung für Kraftübertragung
- French
- Procédé et dispositif destiné à la détection directionnelle d'un défaut sur une ligne de transmission de puissance
Classification
- CPC, 2
- H02H3/382
- H02H7/265
- IPC, 2
- H02H3 00
- H02H7 26
Designated states1
- Contracting states, 1
- Liechtenstein
