Nova Patents
AU2016200959B2

Gated Voltammetry

Abstract

A method of determining a duration of a pulse sequence for determining the concentration of glucose in a blood sample, wherein the pulse sequence includes at least three duty cycles and each of the at least three duty cycles includes an excitation, the method comprising: determining a plurality of calibration sets from currents recorded during the at least three duty cycles; and determining the duration of the pulse sequence in response to a glucose concentration determined from the at least three duty cycles, wherein when the glucose concentration determined from the at least three duty cycles indicates a high glucose concentration, the duration of the pulse sequence is shorter than when the glucose concentration determined from the at least three duty cycles indicates a glucose concentration less than or equal to the high glucose concentration. F ig.1 B 185 Fig, 1 FAig.5 1180 F-i-g-.-

AU2016200959B2, drawing sheet 1
Sheet 1 of 3

Term

9.4 yearsleft in the term

Expires 15 February 2036.

  1. Priority
  2. Filed
  3. Granted
  4. Today
  5. Expires

21 claims: 21 independent, 0 dependent

  1. 1
    Claims:1. A voltammetric method for determining a concentration of an analyte in a sample, the voltammetric method comprising: 5 applying a pulse sequence to the sample, the pulse sequence comprising at least two duty cycles having excitation/relaxation time ratios from 0.3 to 0.2, wherein each of the at least two duty cycles includes an excitation, and wherein the excitations comprise a potential varied linearly at a rate of at least 2 mV/secl measuring resulting currents from the at least two duty cycles! and 10 determining the concentration of the analyte in the sample from the resultin g currents.
  2. 2
    A voltammetric method for determining a concentration of an analyte in a sample, the voltammetric method comprising·:15 applying a pulse sequence to the sample, the pulse sequence comprising at, least two duty cycles having excitation/relaxation time ratios from 0.3 to 0.2, wherein each of the at least two duty cycles includes an excitation, and wherein the excitations are acyclic and substantially exclude a reverse oxidation peak or a reverse reduction peak of a measurable species responsive to the concentration of 2 0 the analyte in the sample! measuring resulting currents from the at least two duty cycles! and determining the concentration of the analyte in the sample from the resulting currents. 25 3. A voltammetric method for determining a concentration of an analyte in a sample, the voltammetric method comprising: applying a pulse sequence to the sample, the pulse sequence comprising at, least two duty cycles having excitation/relaxation time ratios from 0.3 to 0.2, wherein each of the at least two duty cycles includes an excitation! 30 measuring resulting currents from the at least, two duty cycles! and determining the concentration of the analyte in the sample from the resulting currents, wherein the excitations are acyclic and terminate before initiation of a reverse current peak, 35 the excitations are acyclic and substantially exclude forward and reverse oxidation and reduction peaks of a measurable species responsive to the concentration of the analyte m the sample, or the excitations are acyclic and are substantially within a diffusion limited current region of a redox pair. 7383319_1 (GHMatters) P77079.AU.2 ROSG 1/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 120 2/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 300 320 sfi®dte o 315
  3. 3
    3?5eaooaQ· 315 300 3 ?° 310 OTQOpdO 10 sec . 00.0000. 305 ReadPulsel ~ >θΛ?ο ° Fig.3A 300 300 I.....,,,,,Χ. I aocixfij-v aregoocper 7,. r! Realise320 330 310 τοιχίων,, O U QY>305 ^-330 Fig ,3B 3/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Diffusion Barrier Layer F i g. 4 B
  4. 4
    4/21 500 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig.5
  5. 5
    5/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 g-] θ Linear Scan Duty Cycles 0.5 η-i- n a _. . ι _____ __ .. ____ ________ _ ___ u.*+ o 0.3- - 0,2ra ΐ 0.1φ ο Οο. -0.1- K. .....I ........f...... -0.2- 31 I 1 —J-1 -r~ “i-r ........ -0.3- 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Time (sec) Fig.6A Fig .6B
  6. 6
    6/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig.6D
  7. 7
    7/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 F i g. 6 E Fig .6F
  8. 8
    8/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Potential (Volt vs. Ferricyanide) F ig.7 A Comparison of Cyclic and Acyclic Scans, 0.025 V/sec Fig.7B
  9. 9
    9/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fast Scan Rate Cyclic and Acyclic Voltammetry, Potential (Volt vs. Ferricyanide) Fig.70
  10. 10
    10/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig.8B
  11. 11
    11/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig.8D
  12. 12
    12/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016
  13. 13
    13/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig.90
  14. 14
    14/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig. 10B
  15. 15
    15/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig.lOC Semi-Integrals of Fast Scan Rate Voltammetry, Potential (Volt vs. Ferricyanide) Fig. 10D 2016200959 15 Feb 2016
  16. 16
    16/21 Contour Profiles of si Currents Fig.11 Potential (Volt vs. Ag/AgCf at 0.1 M NaCI) Fig. 12A 0.5
  17. 17
    17/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Potential (Volt vs. Ag/AgCI at 0.1 M NaCI) Fig. 12B Derivatives of Cyclic Voltammograms, 50 mg/dL Potential (Volt vs. Ferricyanide) Fig. 13A 2016200959 15 Feb 2016
  18. 18
    18/21 Derivative of Linear Scan Voltammograms, 100 mg/dL Potential {Volt vs. Ferricyanide) Fig. 13B Derivatives of Cyclic Voltammograms, 400 mg/dL Potential {Volt vs. Ferricyanide) Fig. 130
  19. 19
    19/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Acyclic Scans at Under-fill Condition 15 η-— 0 100 200 300 400 500 Potential (mV vs. Ferricyanide) Fig.15
  20. 20
    20/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 Fig. 16A £10 '55 ex o c o o o y= 170.71x 2 -277.08x+ 114.18 R =0.9982 j ...............................X........... -X0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 Ratio of for/rev at 0.15 V Fig. 16B 1.05
  21. 21
    21/21 2016200959 15 Feb 2016 10.5 Φ « 10 ο ω £ 9.5 Φ Φ = 9 >4Ο Φ §8.5 ω y = -0.0035Χ - 0,1351 χ + 10.363 R 2 = 0.9925 2 4 6 8 GO content (Dry Weight %) Fig. 16C Fig.17
Independent claims21