Echelle grating dense wavelength division multiplexer/demultiplexer
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
An apparatus for use in optical communication systems to multiplex/demultiplex an optical signal consisting of an optical channel(s) of distinct wavelength(s) having a select channel spacing within a select wavelength range. The apparatus includes a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis with each having a propagating end. At least two of the optical waveguides each propagate a distinct multiplexed optical signal comprising a plurality of channels, with the multiplexed optical waveguides being arranged in a multiplexed linear array. The others of the optical waveguides are single channel waveguides arranged in a two dimensional array with linear rows perpendicular to the multiplex linear array and with each linear row corresponding to a multiplex optical waveguide. A reflective echelle grating is optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis and receives an optical signal emitted from at least one of the optical waveguides and detracts the optical signal(s) to at least one other of the optical waveguide(s).

Term
Term ended
Expired 29 July 2020, 6.2 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
32 claims: 8 independent, 24 dependent
- 1A dense wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer for use in optical communications systems using optical signals in a select near infrared wavelength range and a select channel spacing, the multiplexer/demultiplexer comprising:at least two multiplex optical waveguides each propagating a distinct multiplexed optical signal comprising a plurality of channels, the multiplex optical waveguides being arranged in a linear array;a two dimensional array of single channel waveguides, the two dimensional array being arranged in linear rows perpendicular to the multiplex linear array with each linear row corresponding to a multiplex optical waveguide;and a reflective echelle grating optically coupled to the multiplex optical waveguides and the single channel optical waveguides, the echelle grating having a groove spacing of between about 50-300 grooves per millimeter and a blaze angle of between about 51-53 degrees.
- 6An apparatus for use in optical communications systems to multiplex or demultiplex an optical signal comprising optical channel(s) of distinct wavelength(s) having a select channel spacing within a select wavelength range, the apparatus comprising:a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis each having a propagating end, at least two of the optical waveguides each propagating a distinct multiplex optical signal comprising a plurality of channels, the multiplex optical waveguides being arranged in a multiplex linear array and the others of the optical waveguides being single channel waveguides arranged in a two dimensional array with linear rows perpendicular to the multiplex linear array with each linear row corresponding to a multiplex optical waveguide;and a reflective echelle grating optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis receiving an optical signal emitted from at least one of the single channel or multiplex optical waveguides and diffracting the optical signal(s) into at least one other of the multiplex or single channel optical waveguides, respectively.
- 15A method of multiplexing or demultiplexing an optical signal in an optical communications system, the optical signal comprising optical channel(s) of a 0.8 nanometer or less channel spacing and different wavelength within a wavelength range between 1520 and 1610 nanometers, the method comprising:a) providing a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis, at least two of the waveguides propagating a plurality of multiplexed channels, the at least two multiplex waveguides being aligned in a multiplex linear array and the others of the optical waveguides propagating single channels;b) aligning the others of the optical waveguides in a two dimensional array having linear rows perpendicular to the multiplex linear array with each multiplex waveguide corresponding to a distinct linear row of single channel waveguides;c) directing an optical signal from at least one of the optical waveguides to a reflective echelle grating optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis;d) diffracting the optical signal(s) generally along the optical axis;and e) optically coupling the optical signal(s) into the at least one other of the optical waveguides at a select focal length.
- 17A bulk optic echelle grating for use in multiplexing and demultiplexing optical signals in optical communications systems operating in a near infrared wavelength range, the grating comprising a groove spacing of between about 50-300 grooves/millimeter and a blaze angle of between about 51-53 degrees.
- 18An apparatus to multiplex or demultiplex an optical signal comprising:a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis each having a propagating end;and a reflective echelle grating having a groove spacing of between about 50 and 300 grooves per millimeter and blaze angle of between about 51 - 53 degrees optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis receiving an optical signal within a wavelength range of 1520 to 1610 nanometers emitted from at least one of the optical waveguides and diffracting the optical signal ( s ) into at least one other of the optical waveguides.
- 21A dense wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer comprising:a multiplex optical waveguide propagating a plurality of optical channels of a select channel spacing multiplexed as a single optical signal within a select near infrared wavelength range;a collimating/focusing optic optically coupled to the multiplex optical waveguide at a select focal length;a reflective echelle grating optically coupled to the collimating/focusing optic, the echelle grating comprising a groove spacing of between about 50 - 300 grooves per millimeter and a blaze angle between about 51 - 53 degrees providing a channel separation between adjacent channels of the multiplexed optical signal at the select focal length for an order of diffraction between 4 - 7 ;and a linear array of optical demultiplex waveguides each propagating a single channel within the near infrared wavelength range, each optical demultiplex waveguide having a center and a propagating end which is optically coupled to the collimating/focusing optic, the propagating ends being spaced the focal length from the collimating/focusing optic and the centers of adjacent demultiplex waveguides being spaced a distance corresponding to a channel separation between corresponding adjacent channels.
- 28A method of multiplexing of demultiplexing an optical signal comprising:a ) providing a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis, at least one of the waveguides propagating a plurality of multiplexed channels and the others of the optical waveguides propagating single channels;b ) aligning the others of the optical waveguides in a linear array;c ) directing an optical signal from at least one of the optical waveguides to a reflective echelle grating optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis, the grating comprising a groove spacing of between about 50 - 300 grooves/millimeter and a blaze angle providing a channel separation equal to a distance between core centers of adjacent optical waveguides in the linear array at a select focal length for a select order of diffraction between 4 - 7 ;d ) diffracting the optical signal ( s ) generally along the optical axis;and e ) focusing the optical signal ( s ) into the at least one other of the optical waveguides at the select focal length.
- 29Broadest claimClaim Score 83, broad(NHIP)A bulk optic echelle grating for use in multiplexing and demultiplexing optical signals comprising a groove spacing of between about 50 - 300 grooves/millimeter and a blaze angle between about 51 - 53 degrees providing an angular dispersion of between 0 . 091 and 0 . 11 degrees/nm for a select order of diffraction between 4 - 7 .
Independent claims8
92 paragraphs in 6 sections, as filed
RELATED APPLICATIONS
0001This application is a reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. <b>6</b>,<b>647</b>,<b>182</b>, issued Nov. <b>11</b>, <b>2003</b>, entitled “Echelle Grating Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexer/Demultiplexer,” which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/628,774 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,415,080, filed Jul. 29, 2000, entitled, “Echelle Grating Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexer/Demultiplexer,” which claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/209,018, filed Jun. 1, 2000, entitled “Lens-coupled Wavelength Division (De)multiplexing System Utilizing an Echelle Grating;” No. 60/152,218, filed Sep. 3, 1999, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Dense Wavelength Multiplexing and De-multiplexing Fiber Optic Signals Using an Echelle Grating Spectrograph;” No. 60/172,843, filed Dec. 20, 1999, entitled “Improved Method and Apparatus for Dense Wavelength Multiplexing and De-multiplexing Fiber Optic Signals Using an Echelle Grating Spectrograph;” and No. 60/172,885, filed Dec. 20, 1999, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Dense Wavelength Multiplexing and De-multiplexing Fiber Optic Signals from a Single or Many Individual Fibers Using a Single Echelle Grating Spectrograph,” each of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
0002The present invention is directed toward optical communications, and more particularly toward a bulk optical echelle grating multiplexer/demultiplexer.
BACKGROUND ART
0003At the inception of fiber optic communications, typically a fiber was used to carry a single channel of data at a single wavelength. Dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) enables multiple channels at distinct wavelengths within a given wavelength band to be sent over a single mode fiber, thus greatly expanding the volume of data that can be transmitted per optical fiber. The wavelength of each channel is selected so that the channels do not interfere with each other and the transmission losses to the fiber are minimized. Typical DWDM allows up to 40 channels to be simultaneously transmitted by a fiber.
0004The volume of data being transmitted by optical fibers is growing exponentially and the capacity for data transmission is rapidly being consumed. Burying additional fibers is not cost effective. Increasing the optical transmission rate is limited by the speed and economy of electronics surrounding the system as well as chromatic dispersion in the fibers. Thus, the most promising solution for increasing data carrying capacity is increasing the number of channels per a given bandwidth through DWDM.
0005DWDM requires two conceptually symmetric devices: a multiplexer and a demultiplexer. A multiplexer takes multiple beams or channels of light, each at a discrete wavelength and from a discrete source and combines the channels into a single multi-channel or polychromatic beam. The input typically is a linear array of waveguides such as a linear array of optical fibers, a linear array of laser diodes or some other optical source. The output is typically a single waveguide such as an optical fiber. A demultiplexer spacially separates a polychromatic beam into separate channels according to wavelength. Input is typically a single input fiber and the output is typically a linear array of waveguides such as optical fibers or a linear array of photodetectors.
0006In order to meet the requirements of DWDM, multiplexers and demultiplexers require certain inherent features. First, they must be able to provide for a high angular dispersion of closely spaced channels so that individual channels can be separated over relatively short distances sufficiently to couple with a linear array of outputs such as output fibers. Furthermore, the multiplexer/demultiplexer must be able to accommodate channels over a free spectral range commensurate with fiber optic communications bandwidth. Moreover, the devices must provide high resolution to minimize cross talk and must further be highly efficient to minimize signal loss. The ideal device would also be small, durable, thermally stable, inexpensive and scalable.
0007Much of the attention in DWDM devices has been directed to array waveguides. Array waveguides have a set of intermediate pathways, e.g., waveguides, that progressively vary in length to incline wavefronts of different wavelength signals within a free spectral range. Confocal couplers connect the common and individual pathways to opposite ends of the intermediate pathways. One illustrative example is disclosed in Lee, U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,377. Array waveguides suffer from the disadvantages of being expensive to design and manufacture, unable to provide high channel densities over broad wavelengths necessary for DWDM, thermal sensitivity and a lack of scalability and polarization dependent and high insertion losses.
0008Another family of DWDM devices use a network of filters and/or fiber Bragg gratings for channel separation. Pan, U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,350, is illustrative. However, the channel spacing of these devices, on the order of 0.8 or 1.6 nanometers (nm), limits the number of wavelengths that can be coupled into or out of a fibers. Further, these devices present significant issues of optical loss, cross talk, alignment difficulties and thermal sensitivity.
0009Various bulk optical DWDM devices have also been investigated in the prior art. Fu et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,190, teaches a grating-in-etalon wavelength division multiplexing device using a Bragg diffraction grating. Fu requires either a tilt mechanism for fabrication of an etalon waveguide with reflective exposed faces having a Bragg grating written into the waveguide. This device has limited channel separation capacity and requires a tilt mechanism that can be difficult to control and is unreliable.
0010Dueck, U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,884, teaches a DWM device with a collimating optic and bulk grating in near-littrow configuration. Dueck is concerned with the use of a homogeneous boot lens to create a one-piece integrated device. This device is intended to be compact, robust and environmentally and thermally stable. However, the device taught by Dueck fails to address the need to provide many channels for DWDM, high efficiency and a short focal length to provide a compact device.
0011Lundgren, U.S. Pat. No. 6,018,603, like Dueck, teaches the use of a bulk diffraction grating for DWM. Specially, Lundgren teaches the use of an echellette grating in combination with a rod-like graded refractive index lens or imaging lens for correcting any offset in the focal length of a focusing lens. Lundgren also fails to teach a DWDM device capable of accommodating high channel density and providing a high angular dispersion of channels so as to minimize focal length and apparatus size.
0012Other examples of techniques for multiplexing and demultiplexing optical signals include the use of birefringement element, the use of optical band pass filters, the use of interference filters, the use of prisms and the use of sequences of cascaded gratings. However, none of these systems provide the combination of beneficial attributes necessary to meet the growing needs for DWDM.
0013The present invention is intended to overcome some of the problems discussed above and to provide a bulk optical echelle grating multiplexer/demultiplexer with many of the attributes necessary for cost-effective DWDM.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
0014A dense wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer (“DWDM”) for use in optical communication systems using optical signals in a select near infrared wavelength range and a select channel spacing includes at least two multiplex optical waveguides each propagating a distinct multiplexed optical signal comprising a plurality of channels. The multiplex optical waveguides are arranged in a linear array. A two dimensional array of single channel waveguides is arranged in linear rows perpendicular to the multiplexed linear array with each linear row corresponding to a multiplex optical waveguide. A reflective echelle grating is optically coupled to the multiplex optical waveguides and the single channel optical waveguides. The echelle grating has a groove spacing of between about 50-300 grooves/millimeter and a blaze angle of between about 51-53 degrees. The select near infrared wavelength range is preferably between about 1520-1610 nanometers and the select channel spacing is 0.8 nanometers or less. A collimating/focusing optic having a select focal length may be optically coupled between the multiplex and single channel waveguide arrays. The collimating/focusing optic preferably has a focal length less than 152.4 millimeters.
0015Another aspect of the present invention is an apparatus for use in optical communication systems to multiplex or demultiplex an optical signal comprising optical channel(s) of distinct wavelength(s) having a select channel spacing within a select wavelength range. The apparatus includes a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis with each having a propagating end. At least two of the optical waveguides each propagate a distinct multiplexed optical signal comprising a plurality of channels, with the multiplexed optical waveguides being arranged in a multiplex linear array. The others of the optical waveguides are single channel waveguides arranged in a two dimensional array with linear rows perpendicular to the multiplex linear array and with each linear row corresponding to a multiplex optical waveguide. A reflective echelle grating is optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis and receives an optical signal emitted from at least one of the optical waveguides and diffracts the optical signal(s) to at least one other of the optical waveguide(s). The echelle grating may have a groove spacing of between about 50-300 grooves/millimeter and a blaze angle of between about 51-53 degrees.
0016Another aspect of the present invention is a method of multiplexing or demultiplexing an optical signal in a optical communication systems. The optical signal comprises optical channels of a 0.8 nanometer or less channel spacing and different wavelengths within a wavelength range between 1520-1610 nanometers. The method includes providing a plurality of optical waveguides aligned generally along the same optical axis, at least two of the waveguides propagating a plurality of multiplexed channels, the at least two multiplexed waveguides being aligned in a multiplex linear array. The others of the optical waveguides propagate single channels. The single channel waveguides are aligned in a two-dimensional array having linear rows perpendicular to the multiplexed linear array with each multiplexed waveguide corresponding to a distinct linear row of single channel waveguides. An optical signal is directed from at least one of the optical waveguides to a reflective echelle grating optically coupled to the plurality of optical waveguides along the optical axis. The optical signal is diffracted generally along the optical axis and optically coupled into at least one other of the optical waveguides at a select focal length. The reflective echelle grating may have a blaze angle of between about 51-53 degrees and a groove spacing of between about 50-300 grooves/millimeter.
0017Yet another aspect of the invention is a bulk optic echelle grating for use in multiplexing and demultiplexing optical signals in optical communication systems operating in a near infrared wavelength range. The grating has a groove spacing of between about 50-300 grooves/millimeter and a blaze angle of between about 51-53 degrees.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0018<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a schematic plan view of a multiplexer/demultiplexer using a bulk echelle grating in accordance with the present invention;
0019<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is an enlarged cross-section of the echelle grating grooves illustrating relevant dimensions;
0020<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a graphical representation of possible step widths and riser heights at different orders which may yield a working echelle grating;
0021<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is a schematic representation of an example of a multiplexer/demultiplexer with a bulk echelle grating in accordance with the present invention;
0022<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is a partial cross-sectional view of a pigtail template;
0023<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> is a perspective view of the multiplexer/demultiplexer with bulk echelle grating of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> illustrating the potential adjustment of the components;
0024<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> is a schematic view of a first alternate embodiment of the multiplexer/demultiplexer using a bulk echelle grating including a pair of collimating/focusing concave mirrors;
0025<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref> is a second alternate embodiment of the multiplexer/demultiplexer of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> further including a prism providing for wavelength dispersion in a horizontal direction;
0026<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref> is a third alternate embodiment of the multiplexer/demultiplexer using a single collimating/focusing mirror;
0027<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> is a fourth alternate embodiment of the multiplexer/demultiplexer in accordance with the present invention using an off-axis parabolic mirror as the collimating/focusing optic with the device arranged in a near-littrow configuration;
0028<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 11</figref> is a fifth alternate embodiment of the multiplexer/demultiplexer of the present invention using a concave echelle grating;
0029<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref> is a schematic representation of an apparatus for dividing a broad bandwidth into bandwidth segments for multiplexing/demultiplexing;
0030<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref> is a schematic representation of the embodiment of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref> using three waveband dividing elements;
0031<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 14</figref> is a schematic elevation of a pigtail harness having a one-dimensional input array of fibers and a two dimensional output array of fibers;
0032<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 15</figref> is a schematic representation of a multiplexer/demultiplexer having stacked multiplex fibers and a two-dimensional array of single channel fibers;
0033<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 16</figref> is a alternate embodiment of a multiplexer/demultiplexer having a stacked input fiber array and a two-dimensional array of output fibers; and
0034<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 17</figref> is a schematic representation of the embodiment of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 16</figref> having 4 multi-channel input fibers and 4×n single channel output fibers.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
0035A multiplexer/demultiplexer for use in optical communication systems <b>10</b> of the present invention is illustrated schematically in FIG. <b>1</b>. It includes a pigtail harness <b>12</b> consisting of an input waveguide <b>14</b>, a plurality of output waveguides <b>16</b> arranged in a linear array adjacent the input fiber, a collimating/focusing lens <b>18</b> and an echelle grating <b>20</b>, each of which are optically coupled. In the present discussion the multiplexer/demultiplexer will be discussed in terms of a demultiplexer. The description applies equally to a multiplexer, only with the function of the input and output waveguides <b>14</b>, <b>16</b> reversed. Also, for the sake of clarity, only seven output waveguides are illustrated (the center output waveguides underlies the input fiber in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> as can be seen with respect to elements <b>142</b> and <b>148</b> of FIG. <b>14</b>). Furthermore, the waveguides <b>14</b>, <b>16</b> are preferably single mode optical fibers. As will be discussed in greater detail below, in the preferred embodiment, <b>90</b> or more output waveguides can be associated with a single input waveguide, depending upon the bandwidth channel, separation and a number of other factors.
0036As used herein, “optically coupled” or “optically communicates” means any connection, coupling, link or the like, by which optical signals carried by one optical element are imparted to the “coupled” or “communicating” element. Such “optically communicating” devices are not necessarily directly connected to one another, but may be separated by a space through which the optical signals traverse or by intermediate optical components or devices.
0037As illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, the multiplexer/demultiplexer <b>10</b> is in “near littrow configuration,” meaning that the incident beam λ<sub>1-n </sub>and the channels diffracted off the surface of the grating λ<sub>1</sub>, λ<sub>2</sub>, λ<sub>3</sub>, λ<sub>4</sub>, λ<sub>5</sub>, λ<sub>6</sub>, λ<sub>7 </sub>are generally along the same optical axis (that is, they trace a very close path) and the lens both collimates the input beam λ<sub>1-n </sub>and focuses the diffracted channels λ<sub>1</sub>-λ<sub>7 </sub>to the output fibers <b>16</b>.
0038The echelle grating <b>20</b>, like other gratings such as echellette gratings, uses interference between light wavefronts reflected from various portions of its ruled surface or steps <b>22</b> to divide the incident beam consisting of a plurality of channels λ<sub>1-n </sub>having a select channel spacing within a select wavelength range λ<sub>1-n </sub>into separate channels of wavelength beams λ<sub>1</sub>-λ<sub>7 </sub>which are angularly dispersed by the grating into output waveguides some distance away. Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, the channel separation of the device (D), which is the product of the focal length of the focusing/collimating optic the angular dispersion and the incremental channel spacing, is equal to the distance S between the center of adjacent output waveguides. The echelle grating <b>20</b> is particularly suited to use in optical communication systems because of a unique combination of properties: 1) it provides clear channel separation notwithstanding channels being closely spaced (0.4 nm or less); 2) it provides large spatial separation of channels over relatively short distances; and 3) it is highly efficient in the range of optical communications wavelengths.
0039Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref>, for the purpose of this specification, echelle gratings are a special grating structure having groove density (1/d) of under 300 grooves/mm and a blaze angle θ<sub>b </sub>of greater than 45° which typically operate at an order of diffraction greater than 1. In combination, these features enable a multiplexer/demultiplexer that efficiently separates closely spaced channels over a relatively small focal length (e.g., 5 inches) enabling a small form factor form factor (on the order of 10 inches in length or less).
0040Consideration of certain external and performance constraints point to the desirability of echelle gratings for DWDM. The external constraints include the following: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li id="ul0001-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0002" list-style="none"><li id="ul0002-0001" num="0041">1) Minimize focal length, with a focal length of under 6 inches desired.</li><li id="ul0002-0002" num="0042">2) Center wavelength in near infrared, approximately at the center of the C-band, 1550 nm.</li><li id="ul0002-0003" num="0043">3) A minimal channel spacing (e.g., 0.4 nm or less).</li><li id="ul0002-0004" num="0044">4) Large free spectral range, 150 nm.</li><li id="ul0002-0005" num="0045">5) System f number in the range of 4-8.</li><li id="ul0002-0006" num="0046">6) Rugged, minimum cost system.</li></ul></li></ul>
0047The performance constraints include: <ul id="ul0003" list-style="none"><li id="ul0003-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0004" list-style="none"><li id="ul0004-0001" num="0048">1) Resolution greater than 20,000.</li><li id="ul0004-0002" num="0049">2) High dispersion.</li><li id="ul0004-0003" num="0050">3) Flat response across spectral range.</li><li id="ul0004-0004" num="0051">4) High efficiency or low loss, (>75%).</li><li id="ul0004-0005" num="0052">5) Minimize polarization dependent loss.</li></ul></li></ul>
0053The external constraints of ruggedness size and cost minimization as well as performance constraints of ease of alignment and high efficiency dictate a littrow configuration, which simplifies the system optimization analysis.
0054<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> illustrates the echelle grating geometry and the variables set forth below. <ul id="ul0005" list-style="none"><li id="ul0005-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0006" list-style="none"><li id="ul0006-0001" num="0055">θ<sub>b</sub>=blaze angle</li><li id="ul0006-0002" num="0056">α=incident angle</li><li id="ul0006-0003" num="0057">β=diffracted angle</li><li id="ul0006-0004" num="0058">In littrow, θ<sub>b</sub>=α≅β</li><li id="ul0006-0005" num="0059">b=step (reflective surface) size</li><li id="ul0006-0006" num="0060">d=1/groove density</li><li id="ul0006-0007" num="0061">a=riser size</li></ul></li></ul>
0062Examination of a number of constraining factors discussed above illustrate the utility of echelle gratings for DWDM.
00631. Constraining Factors: f number (f) in range of 4-8 and resolution (“R”)>20,000. <ul id="ul0007" list-style="none"><li id="ul0007-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0008" list-style="none"><li id="ul0008-0001" num="0064">Result: For a grating in littrow configuration, <maths id="MATH-US-00001" num="00001"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>R</mi><mo>></mo><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mi>W</mi><mi>λ</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0001.tif" /></li><li id="ul0008-0002" num="0065"> where W is the illuminated width of the grating. Thus, or W≈(20,000/2)(1550 nm) or W≈1.55 cm</li><li id="ul0008-0003" num="0066">W×f=fl (focal length), or</li><li id="ul0008-0004" num="0067">fl≈1.55 cm×8≈124</li></ul></li></ul>
00682. Constraining Factors: Fl>124 mm and channel separation at least 80μ. <ul id="ul0009" list-style="none"><li id="ul0009-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0010" list-style="none"><li id="ul0010-0001" num="0069">Result: For an echelle grating in littrow, dispersion <maths id="MATH-US-00002" num="00002"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>b</mi></msub></mrow><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mi>m</mi><mi>b</mi></mfrac><mo>·</mo><mi>fl</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0002.tif" /></li><li id="ul0010-0002" num="0070">where m=order of diffraction. Thus, assuming channel separation to be at least 80μ, Δλ=4×10<sup>−4</sup>μ and fl=1.2×10<sup>4</sup>μ, m>1.5b.</li></ul></li></ul>
00713. Constraining Factors: FSR (free spectral range)>150 Result: <maths id="MATH-US-00003" num="00003"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>FSR</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mi>λ</mi><mi>m</mi></mfrac></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0003.tif" /><ul id="ul0011" list-style="none"><li id="ul0011-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0012" list-style="none"><li id="ul0012-0001" num="0072"> which implies <maths id="MATH-US-00004" num="00004"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mn>1550</mn><mn>10</mn></mfrac></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0004.tif" /></li><li id="ul0012-0002" num="0073"> or m≦10.</li></ul></li></ul>
00744. Constraining Factors: Wish to provide a flat response over the bandwidth. <ul id="ul0013" list-style="none"><li id="ul0013-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0014" list-style="none"><li id="ul0014-0001" num="0075">Result: The diffraction envelope must have a broad enough maximum so that loss is minimized at the extremes of the wavelength range. This dictates b<8.5μ. An order over 7 spreads the light too much across the diffraction peak, resulting in unacceptably low efficiency. Thus: b<8.51μ and m≦7.</li></ul></li></ul>
00765. Constraining Factors: High efficiency. (>85°) <ul id="ul0015" list-style="none"><li id="ul0015-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0016" list-style="none"><li id="ul0016-0001" num="0077">Result: Efficiency is a function of step size. A step size must be selected providing a channel width capturing 90% of the signal at a select order.</li><li id="ul0016-0002" num="0078">b>3μ yields suitable efficiency.</li></ul></li></ul>
00796. Constraining Factors: Limitations on m from 4, and 2. above. <ul id="ul0017" list-style="none"><li id="ul0017-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0018" list-style="none"><li id="ul0018-0001" num="0080">Result: 1.5<m<7.</li></ul></li></ul>
00817. Constraining Factors: For an echelle grating in littrow mode: <maths id="MATH-US-00005" num="00005"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></mfrac><mo>.</mo></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0005.tif" /><ul id="ul0019" list-style="none"><li id="ul0019-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0020" list-style="none"><li id="ul0020-0001" num="0082">Result: a=3.88μ at m=5 <ul id="ul0021" list-style="none"><li id="ul0021-0001" num="0083">4.65μ at m=6</li><li id="ul0021-0002" num="0084">5.43μ at m=7</li></ul></li></ul></li></ul>
0085<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> illustrates that these constraints and results provide a range of values for a and b at a given range of suitable orders (m). Simulations aimed at maximizing efficiency and minimizing polarization dependent loss optimize around blaze angles and groove frequencies that fall in the range of echelle gratings, i.e., 45<θ<sub>b</sub><78° and d<300 grooves/nm. Furthermore, limitations on manufacturing further dictate that only echelle gratings can provide the necessary results within the external and performance constraints.
0086In designing a functioning multiplexer/demultiplexer, a number of design parameters were selected that were dictated by many of the external and performance constraints set forth above. An exemplary configuration is illustrated schematically in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, with like elements having the same reference number as FIG. <b>1</b>. The dictating constraints and their effect on the exemplary bulk echelle grating DWDM are as follows:
00871. Channel Characteristics
0088Currently optical communications utilize what is know as the “C” band of near infrared wavelengths, a wavelength band ranging from 1528-1565 nanometers (nm). This provides a bandwidth or free spectral range of 37 nm available for channel separation. Known prior art multiplexer/demultiplexers require a channel spacing of 0.8 nm or even 1.6 nm, resulting in a possibility of only between 48 and 24 channels. Because echelle gratings provide markedly superior channel dispersion, a much smaller channel spacing of 0.4 nm was chosen, resulting in a possibility of 93 channels over the C band. As the tuning range of semiconductor lasers increases and optical communications expand beyond the “C” band to include the “L” band (1566-1610 nm) and the “S” band (≈1490-1527 nm), a total bandwidth of about 120 nm or more is foreseeable, creating a possibility of the multiplexer/demultiplexer accommodating 300 channels or more per input fiber.
0089Current optical communications operate primarily at a channel frequency of 2.5 GHz, known as OC48. At OC48 the channel width λ<sub>48=</sub>0.02 nm. Optical communications are currently beginning to adopt a frequency of 10 GHz, know as OC192. At OC192 the channel width λ<sub>192=</sub>0.08 nm.
00902. Fiber Dimensions
0091Standard single mode optical fiber used in optical communications typically have an outer diameter of 125 microns (μ) and a core diameter of 10μ. Optical fibers having an outer diameter of 80μ and core diameter of 8.3 i are available, model SM-1250 manufactured by Fibercore. In this example, both the input fiber <b>14</b> and the output fiber <b>16</b> are single mode and share the 80μ outer diameter. Assuming the output fibers <b>16</b> are abutted in parallel as illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, this results in the core centers being spaced 80μ, or a required channel separation D of 80μ at the select focal length. Because fibers of different outer diameter are available and fibers cladings can be etched away, it is possible that the 80μ spacing can be reduced, with core spacing of 40μ or less being foreseeable, which could enable shorter focal lengths or different echelle grating designs having lesser angular dispersion. The spread of the beam emitted from the fiber was 100 at the e-folding distance, although it was later found to be 14° at the 1 % point.
00923. Form Factor
0093The design was intended to provide a high channel density in a form factor consistent with or smaller than used in current multiplexer/demultiplexer devices. A total length of between 10-12 inches was the design target. To accommodate all the optics and harnesses, a maximum focal length of 5 inches (127 mm) was chosen. As discussed above, in light of the constraining factors of the f number between 4-8 and a resolution (R)>20,000, a focal length of 124 was ultimately dictated.
00944. Dispersion Limitations
0095In order to prevent the loss of data, it was necessary that the dispersion of the echelle grating be constrained. The initial 0.4 μm channel spacing at the echelle grating was required to be about 80μ of separation at the output fibers (corresponding to the core spacing). On the other hand, the 0.08 μm channel width of OC192 frequencies could not disperse to much greater than the fiber core aperture over the focal length. Thus: <maths id="MATH-US-00006" num="00006"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>I</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>o</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mi>sin</mi></msub><mo></mo><mi>β</mi></mrow><mi>β</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup><mo></mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mi>sin</mi></msub><mo></mo><mi>N</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>α</mi></mrow><mi>α</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0006.tif" />
00965. Grating Design
0097The variables affecting grating design are: <ul id="ul0022" list-style="none"><li id="ul0022-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0023" list-style="none"><li id="ul0023-0001" num="0098">1) wavelength range</li><li id="ul0023-0002" num="0099">2) efficiency</li><li id="ul0023-0003" num="0100">3) dispersion (D)</li><li id="ul0023-0004" num="0101">4) desired resolution <maths id="MATH-US-00007" num="00007"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mi>λ</mi><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0007.tif" /></li></ul></li></ul>
0102<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a cross-section showing the principle echelle grating dimensions including: blaze angle (θ<sub>b</sub>), wavelength range and groove density (d).
0103For design of the grating, 150 channels centered on 1550 nm was chosen. This results in a physical size of the spectral image of (number of channels)×(maximum separation, or 150×80μ=12,000μ. This desire to have 90% of the intensity contained in 12,000% constrains the size of b. The far field pattern of the diffraction grating is <maths id="MATH-US-00008" num="00008"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>I</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>I</mi><mi>o</mi></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mi>sin</mi></msub><mo></mo><mi>β</mi></mrow><mi>β</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup><mo></mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mi>sin</mi></msub><mo></mo><msup><mi>N</mi><mi>α</mi></msup></mrow><mi>α</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0008.tif" />
0104N=number of lines illuminated, <maths id="MATH-US-00009" num="00009"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>π</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>b</mi></mrow><mi>λ</mi></mfrac><mo></mo><mi>sin</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>b</mi></msub><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>and</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>α</mi></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mi>π</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>d</mi></mrow><mi>λ</mi></mfrac><mo></mo><mi>sin</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>b</mi></msub><mo>.</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0009.tif" /><br /> Spread sheet calculations show that b≦5.5λ(or b≦8.5μ), is necessary to make the spectral image >12,000μ at its 90% intensity point. In littrow mode, the angular dispersion is: <maths id="MATH-US-00010" num="00010"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mfrac><mi>m</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi><mo></mo><mi>cos</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>b</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>or</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>ⅆ</mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mi>m</mi><mi>b</mi></mfrac></mrow></mrow></math></maths><maths id="MATH-US-00010-2" num="00010.2"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mrow><mi>x</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>linear</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>separation</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>θ</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>fl</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mfrac><mi>m</mi><mi>b</mi></mfrac><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>·</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>fl</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths><maths id="MATH-US-00010-3" num="00010.3"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mn>80</mn><mo></mo><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mo><</mo><mrow><mfrac><mi>m</mi><mi>b</mi></mfrac><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>4</mn></mrow></msup><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1.2</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>5</mn></msup><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths><maths id="MATH-US-00010-4" num="00010.4"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo>></mo><mfrac><mrow><mn>1.6</mn><mo></mo><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub></mrow><msub><mi>.6</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub></mfrac><mo>></mo><mrow><mn>1.6</mn><mo></mo><msub><mi>b</mi><mi>μ</mi></msub></mrow></mrow></math></maths>
0105However, for OC192, dispersion must be constrained to contain the 0.08 nm channel width in a 10μ core, so that m<3.34bμ.
0106Thus, 1.67b<m<3.34b (Condition B).
0107The desired resolution <maths id="MATH-US-00011" num="00011"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>R</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mi>λ</mi><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo>=</mo><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>·</mo><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo>.</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0010.tif" /><br /> Here, λ=1550 nm and Δλ=0.08 nm, yielding a required resolution R=19,375 or approximately 20,000. Assuming a beam size at the grating of 2.1 cm (based upon a fl=124 cm and 10° divergence): <maths id="MATH-US-00012" num="00012"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>2.1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mrow><mi>cos</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><msub><mi>θ</mi><mi>b</mi></msub></mrow></mfrac></mrow><mo>,</mo><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mi>lines</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext>/</mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>cm</mi></mrow><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mi>d</mi></mfrac></mrow></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0011.tif" />
0108Thus, <maths id="MATH-US-00013" num="00013"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mrow><mn>20</mn><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext>,</mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mn>000</mn></mrow><mo><</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><mn>2.1</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>cm</mi></mrow><mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi><mo></mo><mi>cos</mi></mrow><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>θ</mi></mrow></mfrac><mo>·</mo><mi>m</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msup><mn>2.1</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>cm</mi></mrow><mi>B</mi></mfrac><mo></mo><mi>m</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>or</mi></mrow></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0012.tif" /><ul id="ul0024" list-style="none"><li id="ul0024-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0025" list-style="none"><li id="ul0025-0001" num="0109">b<1.05 m (Condition C).</li></ul></li></ul>
0110To align the order m with the diffraction peak in littrow mode, we know <maths id="MATH-US-00014" num="00014"><math overflow="scroll"><mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>m</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>λ</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></mfrac></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0013.tif" /><br /> or a must have the values: <maths id="MATH-US-00015" num="00015"><math overflow="scroll"><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo></mrow></mtd><mtd><mrow><mrow><mn>3.88</mn><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>μ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>at</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>m</mi></mrow><mo>=</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle></mtd><mtd><mrow><mrow><mn>4.65</mn><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>μ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>at</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>m</mi></mrow><mo>=</mo><mn>6</mn></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle></mtd><mtd><mrow><mrow><mn>5.43</mn><mo></mo><mi>μ</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>at</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>m</mi></mrow><mo>=</mo><mn>7</mn></mrow></mtd></mtr></mtable><mo>}</mo></mrow></mtd><mtd><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>Condition</mi><mo></mo><mstyle><mtext> </mtext></mstyle><mo></mo><mi>D</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr></mtable></math></maths><img file="USRE40271E_D0014.tif" />
0111Only as θ<sub>b </sub>increases to greater than 45° is it possible for conditions A and D to be satisfied. Assuming θ<sub>b</sub>=60°, and m=5, <ul id="ul0026" list-style="none"><li id="ul0026-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0027" list-style="none"><li id="ul0027-0001" num="0112">a=3.38μ</li><li id="ul0027-0002" num="0113">b=2.241μ</li><li id="ul0027-0003" num="0114">d=4.48μ.</li><li id="ul0027-0004" num="0115">All of conditions A-D are satisfied.</li></ul></li></ul>
0116Selection of the precise groove density and blaze angle are also affected by the polarization dependent loss and manufacturing constraints. For the embodiment illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> use of an interferometrically controlled ruling engine to machine the line grating drove the selection of a line density evenly divisible by 3600. Considering these various factors led to selection of groove density d=171.4 grooves/mm and m=5. This leads to a=3.88μ, b=3.55μ, and a corresponding blaze angle of 52.6° for this example. However, this methodology shows that for a focal length between 30-125 mm and an order of 5-7, potential blaze angles range between 51° and 53° and the groove density carries between 50 and 300 grooves/mm to provide linear channel separation of between 40-125 microns and an angular dispersion of the echelle of between 0.091 and 0.11 degrees/nm.
0117In the example of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, the echelle grating has a groove density of 171.4 grooves/mm and a blaze angle of 52.6°. The echelle may be formed from one of several known methods. For example, it may be formed from an epoxy layer deposited on a glass substrate into which a master die defining the steps is pressed. The steps are then coated with a highly reflective material such as gold. The steps may also be precision machined directly into a glass or silicon substance and then coated with a reflective material. A further option is the use of photolithographic techniques described in McMahon, U.S. Pat. No. 4,736,360, the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in its entirety.
0118The lens <b>18</b> could be a graded index (GRIN) optic with spherical surfaces or a compound lens with one or more surfaces that might not be spherical (aspheric). The use of lenses or a single lens to collimate the beam and focus the dispersed light limits spherical aberrations or coma resulting from the use of front surface reflectors that require the optical rays to transverse the system in a off-axis geometry. A first type of potential lens uses a radially graded refractive index to achieve near-diffraction limited imaging of off-axis rays. A second type of lens actually consists of at least two individual pieces cemented together (doublet). Another option uses three individual lens pieces (triplet). These pieces may individually have spherical surfaces, or if required for correction of certain types of aberration, aspheric surfaces can be utilized. In this case, the lens would be referred to as an aspheric doublet or triplet.
0119In the example illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, the lens <b>18</b> is an aspheric singlet of a 25.4 mm diameter having a spherical surface <b>26</b> with a radius of curvature of 373.94 mm and an aspheric surface <b>28</b> with a radius of curvature of 75 mm and a conic constant of ˜0.875. The average focal length in the 1520-1580 nm wavelength range is 125.01 nm. Thus, the distance A from the center of the spheric surface to the emitting end of the input and output fibers <b>14</b>, <b>16</b> is about 125 mm. The average distance between the aspheric surface <b>28</b> and the center of the surface of the grating <b>20</b> is about 43.2 mm.
0120In the pigtail <b>12</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, the input and output fibers terminate in the same plane. This is also the case with the example illustrated in FIG. <b>4</b>. In some configurations, however, the inlet <b>14</b> and outlet fibers <b>16</b> are on slightly different axes and do not terminate in the same plane. The fibers <b>14</b>, <b>16</b> of the pigtail are precisely located by being fit into a template <b>34</b> illustrated schematically in FIG. <b>5</b>. The template <b>34</b> has a plurality of parallel v-shaped grooves <b>36</b>. The template and v-shaped grooves are preferably formed by etching the grooves <b>36</b> into a silicon substrate. In the example in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, the grooves of the template are spaced 80μ. The example configuration of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is shown in perspective view in FIG. <b>6</b>. To facilitate alignment, the pigtail <b>12</b>, the lens <b>18</b> and the grating <b>20</b> have limited freedom of movement in multiple directions. Once they are moved into position, they are secured in place by clamps or a suitable bonding agent. The lens <b>18</b> is held stationary. The pigtail <b>12</b> is movable by translation along the x, y and z axes. The input and output fibers can be moved independently along the x axis. The echelle grating <b>20</b> is fixed against translational movement except along the z axis. It can be rotated about each of the x, y and z axes. Other possible combinations of element movement may also yield suitable alignment. The dimensions and performance criterion of the DWDM device <b>10</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> are summarized as follows: <ul id="ul0028" list-style="none"><li id="ul0028-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0029" list-style="none"><li id="ul0029-0001" num="0121">Fibers: SM-1250 (Fibercore) outer diameter <ul id="ul0030" list-style="none"><li id="ul0030-0001" num="0122">Outer diameter 80μ</li><li id="ul0030-0002" num="0123">Core diameter 8.3μ</li><li id="ul0030-0003" num="0124">f Number 4-8</li></ul></li><li id="ul0029-0002" num="0125">Lens: Aspheric singlet <ul id="ul0031" list-style="none"><li id="ul0031-0001" num="0126">Average focal length (fl)=125</li></ul></li><li id="ul0029-0003" num="0127">Optical Signal: λ=1528-1565 nm <ul id="ul0032" list-style="none"><li id="ul0032-0001" num="0128">channel spacing 0.4 nm</li></ul></li><li id="ul0029-0004" num="0129">Grating: <ul id="ul0033" list-style="none"><li id="ul0033-0001" num="0130">d=5.83μ</li><li id="ul0033-0002" num="0131">θ<sub>b</sub>=52.6°</li><li id="ul0033-0003" num="0132">order=6</li></ul></li><li id="ul0029-0005" num="0133">System Performance: <ul id="ul0034" list-style="none"><li id="ul0034-0001" num="0134">D (linear separation)=80μ</li><li id="ul0034-0002" num="0135">Resolution (R)=20,000</li><li id="ul0034-0003" num="0136">Efficiency 75%</li></ul></li><li id="ul0029-0006" num="0137">an alternative to the use of a littrow configuration as well as the use of collimating lenses, concave mirrors may be used for collimating and focusing the incident beam. A first alternate embodiment of a concave mirror dense wavelength multiplexer/demultiplexer <b>40</b> is shown schematically in FIG. <b>7</b>. Single mode input fiber <b>42</b> emits a divergent incident beam <b>44</b> consisting of multiplexed channels onto the surface of a collimating/focusing concave mirror <b>46</b>. The collimated beam <b>48</b> is then directed in an off-axis manner to the surface of an echelle grating <b>50</b>. The echelle grating disperses the channels according to their wavelength in the manner discussed above with respect to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1 and 4</figref> and the dispersed channels <b>52</b> are reflected off axis off the front surface of the concave collimating/focusing mirror <b>54</b>. The collimating/focusing mirror <b>54</b> then focuses and reflects the various channels to a corresponding fiber of an output fiber array <b>56</b>. As alluded to above with respect to the discussion of the embodiments of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1 and 4</figref>, use of surface reflecting optics such as the collimating mirror <b>46</b> and the concave focusing mirror <b>54</b> requires that the optical beams traverse the system in an off-axis geometry which creates significant aberrations (spherical aberrations and coma) that significantly limit the performance of the system. However, the use of the front surface reflecting optics has the potential of facilitating a more compact form factor than is possible with littrow configurations using a single optical lens. As should be readily apparent, combinations of front surface reflecting optics and lenses can be used in non-littrow configurations where necessary to balance form factor minimilization requirements and optical aberrations.</li></ul></li></ul>
0138A second alternate embodiment <b>60</b> is illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref> which is a schematic representation of an echelle grating multiplexer/demultiplexer using a prism in combination with front surface optical mirrors. In this embodiment, light from a single mode input fiber <b>62</b> is directed off a collimating/focusing mirror <b>64</b> and the collimated beam <b>66</b> is directed through prism <b>68</b>. The prism <b>68</b> provides for wavelength dispersion in a horizontal direction as indicated by the beams <b>70</b>. These horizontally dispersed beams <b>70</b> are directed off the echelle grating <b>72</b> which in turn diffracts the beams <b>70</b> in an orthogonal dimension and directs these diffracted beams off the front surface of the concave collimating/focusing mirror <b>74</b>. A two dimensional output fiber array <b>76</b> receives the focused beams from the collimating/focusing mirror <b>74</b>. The use of the prism <b>68</b> in combination with the echelle grating <b>72</b> provides a two dimensional array of wavelength dispersion and may therefore facilitate detector arrays of shorter length as may be desirable in certain applications.
0139<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref> is a schematic representation of a third alternate embodiment <b>80</b> using a single concave mirror as both a collimating and focusing optic along the optical axis. In this embodiment, input fiber <b>82</b> directs a beam consisting of multiplexed channels to the surface of the concave mirror <b>84</b>. A collimated beam <b>86</b> is reflected off the echelle grating <b>88</b> which diffracts the multiplexed signal in the manner discussed above. The demultiplxed channels are then reflected off the surface of the concave mirror <b>84</b> and directed into the array of output fibers <b>92</b>. While the embodiment <b>80</b> contemplates the mirror <b>84</b> being spherical and therefore having a constant diameter of, for example 25 cm, a slightly parabolic or aspheric mirror may be used to improve image quality, if necessary.
0140<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> is a fourth alternate embodiment <b>100</b> using an off-axis parabolic mirror as the collimating/focusing optic. In this embodiment, multiplexed light from the input fiber <b>102</b> is directed off the front surface of an off-axis parabolic mirror <b>104</b> which in turn directs a collimated beam of light <b>106</b> off the surface of an echelle grating <b>108</b>. The multiplexed light is reflected off the surface of the echelle grating <b>108</b> back to the surface of the off-axis parabolic mirror <b>104</b> and dispersed to respective output fibers <b>106</b>. In this embodiment, the echelle grating is in near-littrow configuration, thereby directing light back to the output fibers <b>106</b>.
0141A fifth alternate embodiment illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 11</figref> uses a concave echelle grating <b>107</b> configured to be the optic which collimates and focuses the incoming beam. This embodiment eliminates the need for the collimating/focusing lenses or concave mirrors of alternate embodiments one-four.
0142Various modifications can be provided to the basic echelle grating demultiplexer structures illustrated schematically in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1-11</figref> to further increase the channel carrying capacity of single mode optical fibers. As alluded to above, it is foreseeable in the future that advancements in optical amplifier technology will enable bandwidth in excess of the current 60-80 nm bandwidth used in optical communication. Such broad bandwidths tax the ability of an echelle grating DWDM to effectively multiplex and demultiplex the entire bandwidth, particularly in the frequencies at the edge of this broad band. Accordingly, it would be useful and desirable to use a network of echelle grating DWDM devices with each device optimized to multiplex/demultiplex light in a portion of the broad spectral range. For example, assuming future amplifier technologies enable bandwidths on the order of 120-180 nm, each echelle grating DWDM could be optimized to function with a portion, for example 12, of the bandwidth, 60-90 nm.
0143<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref> illustrates schematically an apparatus <b>110</b> for dividing a broad bandwidth for multiplexing/demultiplexing. The apparatus <b>110</b> consists of an input fiber <b>112</b>, a high pass thin film filter <b>114</b>, a first focusing lens <b>116</b>, a second focusing lens <b>118</b>, a first echelle grating DWDM device <b>120</b> and a second echelle DWDM device <b>122</b>.
0144By way of example, the operation of the apparatus for dividing broad band signals <b>110</b> will be discussed in terms of a demultiplexer. As with other embodiments of this invention, the apparatus may likewise function as a multiplexer simply by reversing the direction of light propagation. A multiplexed beam <b>124</b> emitted from the input fiber <b>112</b> is directed onto the high pass thin film filter <b>114</b>. The high pass thin film filter has a design cut off wavelength that reflects the lower half of the wavelength range toward the first echelle grating DWDM <b>120</b>. The upper half of the wavelength range passes through the filter <b>114</b> to the second echelle DWDM device <b>122</b>. In this example, the input wavelength is in the range of 1460-1580 nm. The high pass thin film filter is designed to cut the band at 1520 nm. Thus, a wavelength range of 1460-1520 nm is directed toward the first echelle grating DWDM and a wavelength band of 1520-1580 nm is directed toward a second echelle grating DWDM device. The signal directed toward the first echelle grating DWDM is optically coupled to the first focusing lens <b>116</b> which directs the lower wavelength beam as an input to the first echelle grating DWDM. In a like manner, the upper wavelength beam <b>128</b> is optically coupled to the second focusing lens <b>118</b> which focuses the upper wavelength beam <b>128</b> as an input beam to the second echelle DWDM device <b>122</b>.
0145The present example contemplates the use of a high pass thin film filter <b>114</b>. However, other waveband dividing elements could be used instead, including devices using fiber Bragg gratings.
0146The first and second echelle grating DWDM devices <b>120</b>, <b>122</b> of the present invention could have any of the configurations discussed above with regard to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1-11</figref>. The use of the echelle DWDM devices for demultiplexing the split wavelength bands provide the many advantages discussed above with regard to the embodiments illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1-11</figref>. However, the present invention could be practiced with other DWDM devices such as fiber Bragg grating devices, integrated waveguide arrays or the like. With an echelle spectrograph permitting wavelength spacing of 0.4 nm, a device for providing a total wavelength range of 120 nm will allow up to 300 channels to be demultiplexed from a single fiber. Furthermore, this system is scalable. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref> illustrates schematically how an input bandwidth of 1460-1700 nm can be divided using three waveband dividing elements to four 60 nm bandwidth beams each of which can be input into an optimized echelle grating DWDM device. Such a device is capable of accommodating a total waveband of 240 nm and assuming a wavelength spacing of 0.4 nm, a total channel count of 600.
0147The bulk optic echelle DWDM of the present invention is able to simultaneously demultiplex signals from a number of input fibers. In each of the echelle grating DWDM devices illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1-7</figref> and <b>9</b>-<b>11</b> above, light is spacially resolved in only one dimension, vertically in a direction transverse the dispersion direction. As a result, input fibers can be vertically stacked in a linear array and a corresponding two dimensional array of output fibers can be provided for receiving demultiplexed signals from the various input fibers. This concept is illustrated schematically in FIG. <b>14</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 14</figref> is an elevation view of a pigtail harness <b>140</b> from the direction of the collimating/focusing optic. First, second and third input fibers <b>142</b>, <b>144</b>, <b>146</b> lying in a vertical linear array are optically coupled to first, second and third horizontal output rows <b>148</b>, <b>150</b>, <b>152</b>, respectively. Thus, a one dimensional input array produces a two-dimensional output array. While the present example is limited to three input fibers <b>142</b>, <b>144</b>, <b>146</b> and only nine output fibers in the output first, second and third output rows <b>148</b>, <b>150</b>, <b>152</b>, the actual number of output fibers will correspond to the number of input channels and will be a function of the channel separation and input bandwidth, and may easily exceed 90 output fibers per output fiber row. Each output fiber has a core center, and the output fiber core centers are spaced a distance equal to the linear separation of the grating at the device focal length. Further, the number of corresponding input and output arrays may be greater than three and is largely a function of external factors such as the space available for the pigtail harness <b>140</b>. As should be appreciated, this configuration allows a single demultiplexer to demultiplex channels from a number of input fibers, thereby minimizing the number of echelle grating DWDM devices required for a multiple input fiber optical system. This further illustrates the flexibility and scalability of the echelle grating DWDM devices in accordance with the invention.
0148<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 15</figref> is a schematic representation of a preferred embodiment of a stacked input bulk optic echelle DWDM device <b>160</b>. Input beam λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1-10 </sub>from input fiber <b>142</b> is directed to the collimating/focusing optic <b>162</b> and a collimated beam is then directed off the reflective surface of the reflective echelle grating <b>164</b>. The diffracted channels λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub>, λ<sup>1</sup><sub>2 </sub>then return through the collimating/focusing optic <b>162</b> and are dispersed to the fibers comprising the first output row <b>148</b> as illustrated by λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub>. The collimating/focusing optic has an optical axis <b>166</b> and the input fiber <b>142</b> and the output row <b>148</b> are equally spaced from the optical axis <b>166</b> of the collimating/focusing optic in the vertical direction. In a like manner, a multiplexed input beam λ<sup>2</sup><sub>1-n </sub>is emitted from the input fiber <b>144</b> and its various channels λ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>, λ<sup>2</sup><sub>2 </sub>are diffracted to the second horizontal output row <b>150</b>. With respect to each of output rows <b>148</b> and <b>150</b>, the centers of the optical fibers in the row are each spaced a distance from the centers of adjacent optical fibers in the row equal to the channel separation of the echelle grating <b>164</b> at the focal length of the focusing/collimating optic <b>162</b>. The propagating ends of the output fibers as well as the propagating ends of the input fibers all lie in a plane spaced the focal length of the collimating/focusing optic from the collimating/focusing optic.
0149<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 16</figref> is a schematic representation of another embodiment of a stacked input optic echelle DWDM device <b>160</b>′. This device is generally the same as that depicted in FIG. <b>15</b> and uses the same reference numbers for ease of reference. The significant difference between this embodiment and that of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 15</figref> is the input fibers <b>142</b>, <b>144</b> are deployed with the input fiber <b>142</b> co-linear with the second horizontal output row <b>150</b> and the input fiber <b>144</b> co-linear with the first output row <b>148</b>. In this embodiment, the multiplexed beam λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1-n </sub>emitted from the input fiber <b>142</b> is diffracted into the first output row <b>148</b> and the multiplexed input beam λ<sup>2</sup><sub>1-n </sub>emitted from the input fiber <b>144</b> is diffracted into the second horizontal output row <b>150</b>. This is represented by the single beams λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1 </sub>and λ<sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>, with beams λ<sup>1</sup><sub>2-n </sub>and λ<sup>2</sup><sub>2-n </sub>being omitted for clarity. The input fibers <b>142</b>, <b>144</b> and the horizontal output rows <b>148</b>, <b>150</b> are equally spaced from the optical axis <b>166</b>.
0150<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 17</figref> illustrates schematically a four input fiber linear array <b>200</b> for multiplex input beams λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1-n</sub>, λ<sup>2</sup><sub>1-n</sub>, λ<sup>3</sup><sub>1-n </sub>and λ<sup>4</sup><sub>1-n </sub>and a corresponding 4 by n two dimensional array of single channel fibers <b>202</b> for receiving single channel beams, e.g., λ<sup>1</sup><sub>1</sub>, λ<sup>2</sup><sub>2</sub>, λ<sup>3</sup><sub>3</sub>, λ<sup>4</sup><sub>4</sub>. The input or multiplex fiber array <b>200</b> is perpendicular to the rows of single channel fibers of the array <b>202</b>. This further illustrates how the input fibers are spaced the same distance from the optical axis <b>204</b> as the corresponding row of single channel output fibers. Additional input and output fibers can be added by stacking them in the same manner as illustrated in FIG. <b>17</b>.
0151The echelle grating DWDM devices in accordance with the present invention provide for dense channel spacing (0.4 nm) over a given bandwidth, thereby maximizing the number of channels that can be carried by a single fiber for a given bandwidth. By careful selection of the echelle grating blaze angle and step spacing, the channels may be multiplexed/demultiplexed at high resolutions and high efficiencies. Further, use of the echelle grating enables a smaller form factor because the angular diffraction allows for shorter focal lengths between the focusing lens and the input/output fibers. The use of bulk optical elements provides a system which is easy to manufacture, highly reliable and scalable. Further embodiments of the invention including the use of a waveband dividing element such as a thin film high pass filter allows extremely broad bands of signals to be divided and simultaneously multiplexed or demultiplexed in parallel. Because the device disperses light in a single linear dimension, a plurality of input fibers can be stacked so that each bulk optic echelle grating DWDM device can accommodate multiple input fibers.
Contents6
26 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12 Sheet 13 Sheet 14 Sheet 15 Sheet 16 Sheet 17 Sheet 18 Sheet 19 Sheet 20 Sheet 21 Sheet 22 Sheet 23 Sheet 24 Sheet 25 Sheet 26
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US9482862B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8528429B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11487068B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8446458B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011174053A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2014086531A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2011050845A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| WO0076000A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| WO0114920A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| WO0114921A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| EP1008878A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| US3658423A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3658424A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3840738A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3845294A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3863063A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3873825A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4111524A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4198117A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4299488A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4391523A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4405199A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4468766A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4517456A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4715027A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4736360A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4773063A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4784935A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4824193A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4846552A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4852079A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4984888A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4985898A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4993796A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5018856A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5042893A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5058977A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5119454A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5206920A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5228103A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5315423A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5371813A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5477363A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5546209A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5581639A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5583683A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5596407A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5666195A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5706377A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5748350A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5748815A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5784507A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5799118A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5838848A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5862279A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5912751A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5937113A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5970190A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5973780A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6011884A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6011885A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6014482A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6018603A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6061129A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6067178A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6078048A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6084695A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6088496A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6097863A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6144783A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6160931A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6160933A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6181853B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6282337B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6304692B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6415080B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO9931532A2 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| WO9941858A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| WO9931532 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Third party observation |
| WO9941858 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Third party observation |
| WO0076000 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Third party observation |
| WO0114920 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Third party observation |
| WO0114921 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Third party observation |
| Koonen & Wismeijer, "Optical Devices for Wavelength Division Multiplexing Systems", Philips Telecommunications Review, vol. 40, No. 2, Jul. 1982. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Loewen et al., "Echelles: scalar, electromagnetic, and real-groove properties", Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 10, Apr. 1, 1995. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Richardson Grating Laboratory, "Selection of dispersing Systems XI", The Diffraction Grating Handbook, Chapter 11, 1996-1999. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Smith et al., "Diffraction Gratings Utilizing Total Internal Reflection Facets in Littrow Configuration", IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Sun et al., "Demultiplexer with 120 Channels and 0.29-nm Channel Spacing", IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1998. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Koonen & Wismeijer, “Optical Devices for Wavelength Division Multiplexing Systems”, Philips Telecommunications Review, vol. 40, No. 2, Jul. 1982. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Loewen et al., “Echelles: scalar, electromagnetic, and real-groove properties”, Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 10, Apr. 1, 1995. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Richardson Grating Laboratory, “Selection of dispersing Systems XI”, The Diffraction Grating Handbook, Chapter 11, 1996-1999. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Smith et al., “Diffraction Gratings Utilizing Total Internal Reflection Facets in Littrow Configuration”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 11, No. 1, Jan. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Sun et al., “Demultiplexer with 120 Channels and 0.29-nm Channel Spacing”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 10, No. 1, Jan. 1998. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
21 members in 8 offices
Priority claims26
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15221899 | United States of America | P | |
| 15221899 | United States of America | P | |
| 17284399 | United States of America | P | |
| 17284399 | United States of America | P | |
| 17288599 | United States of America | P | |
| 17288599 | United States of America | P | |
| 20901800 | United States of America | P | |
| 20901800 | United States of America | P | |
| 62877400 | United States of America | A | |
| 62877400 | United States of America | A | |
| 12195602 | United States of America | A | |
| 12195602 | United States of America | A | |
| 18002705 | United States of America | A | |
| 09628774 | – | – | – |
| 10121956 | – | – | – |
| 60152218 | – | – | – |
| 60172843 | – | – | – |
| 60172885 | – | – | – |
| 60209018 | – | – | – |
| US19990152218P | – | – | – |
| US19990172843P | – | – | – |
| US19990172885P | – | – | – |
| US20000209018P | – | – | – |
| US20000628774 | – | – | – |
| US20020121956 | – | – | – |
| US20050180027 | – | – | – |
Members21
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2383611A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| WO0118577A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| AU7472000A | Australia | A | |
| US6304692B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| WO0181964A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| AU8043001A | Australia | A | |
| WO0181964A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| US6415080B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| EP1218785A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| US6421481B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| WO02071119A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| CN1377474A | China | A | |
| US2002181856A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| TW518435B | Taiwan Province of China | B | |
| US2003026541A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| JP2003532128A | Japan | A | |
| US6647182B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| CN1164961C | China | C | |
| AU781433B2 | Australia | B2 | |
| CA2383611C | Canada | C | |
| USRE40271EThis record | United States of America | E |
47 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 1 non-final rejection.
- Non-final rejections
- 1
- Final rejections
- 0
- RCEs
- 0
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Entity Status Set To Undiscounted (Initial Default Setting or Status Change)BIG. | BIG. | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/ | PGM/ | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR | WPIR | |
| Receipt into PubsR1021 | R1021 | |
| Dispatch to FDCD1935 | D1935 | |
| Dispatch to FDCD1935 | D1935 | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS | PILS | |
| Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084 | N084 | |
| Issue Fee Payment ReceivedIFEE | IFEE | |
| Workflow - File Sent to ContractorSENT | SENT | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=. | MN/=. | |
| Mail Examiner's AmendmentMEX.A | MEX.A | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Amendment Crossed in MailA.NQ | A.NQ | |
| Supplemental ResponseSA.. | SA.. | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=. | N/=. | |
| Examiner's Amendment CommunicationEX.A | EX.A | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Oath or Declaration Filed (Including Supplemental)C602 | C602 | |
| Response after Ex Parte Quayle ActionA.QU | A.QU | |
| Mail Examiner Interview Summary (PTOL - 413)MEXIN | MEXIN | |
| Examiner Interview Summary Record (PTOL - 413)EXIN | EXIN | |
| Mail Ex Parte Quayle Action (PTOL - 326)MCTEQ | MCTEQ | |
| Quayle actionCTEQ | CTEQ | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Affidavit(s) (Rule 131 or 132) or Exhibit(s) ReceivedAF/D | AF/D | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Paralegal Reissue Review CompletePRIR | PRIR | |
| IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center CompleteTSSCOMP | TSSCOMP | |
| Notice of Reissue Published in Official GazetteNRE. | NRE. | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Cleared by OIPE CSRL194 | L194 | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN | SCAN | |
| Preliminary AmendmentA.PE | A.PE | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
5 recorded assignments at the USPTO, latest first
- Now
Now: Held by
ONPOINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC - 2020-06-02
Assignment of assignors interest.
- From
- JOHN ZINK COMPANY, LLC
- To
- ONPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Recorded 2020-06-02, Signed 2020-06-01
- 2018-03-19
Assignment of assignors interest.
- From
- ZOLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- To
- JOHN ZINK COMPANY, LLC
Recorded 2018-03-19, Signed 2018-01-02
- 2018-01-02
Corrective assignment to correct the assignor name to silicon valley bank previously recorded on reel 044502 frame 0402. assignor(s) hereby confirms the release of security interest.
Release- From
- SILICON VALLEY BANK
- To
- ZOLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Recorded 2018-01-02, Signed 2017-12-22
- 2017-12-28
Release by secured party.
Release- From
- SILICON VALLEY BANLC
- To
- ZOLO TECHNOLOGIES INC
Recorded 2017-12-28, Signed 2017-12-22
- 2006-11-13
Security interest.
Security interest- From
- ZOLO TECHNOLOGIES INC
- To
- SILICON VALLEY BANK
Recorded 2006-11-13, Signed 2006-07-18
8 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| Fee payment procedureENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYFEPP | FEPP | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- RE040271
- Publication, DOCDB
- RE40271
- Publication, EPODOC
- USRE40271E
- Application
- 11180027
- Application, DOCDB
- 18002705
- Application, EPODOC
- US20050180027
Titles
- English
- Echelle grating dense wavelength division multiplexer/demultiplexer
Classification
- CPC, 6
- G02B6/29308
- G02B5/1861
- G02B6/2931
- G02B6/29361
- G02B6/29373
- G02B6/2938
- IPC, 3
- G02B6 34
- G02B5 18
- G02B6 293
- USPC, 3
- 385037000
- 385024000
- 385033000