Programmable bandwidth voltage regulator

The present invention relates to the field of integrated circuits, and is more specifically directed to voltage regulators. This application is a reissue of <b>08</b>/<b>574</b>,<b>609</b> filed on Dec. <b>13</b>, <b>1995</b>, now U.S. Pat. No. <b>5</b>,<b>744</b>,<b>944</b>.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In order to reduce power consumption many electronic components are now capable of operating at several power consumption levels, one of which is typically a power-down or sleep mode. The power-down mode is a low power consumption level that the component can enter into when it is not performing an operation or being accessed. Reducing the level of power consumption is particularly useful for battery operated devices, such as portable computers, where reducing power consumption increases the battery life, and therefore the time the device can be used without having to either replace or recharge the battery.

A microprocessor consumes a significant amount of power in the full power-up mode, and it is typically accessed only a small portion of the time, therefore it is advantageous to bring the microprocessor into the power-down mode when it is not being accessed. In the power-up mode the microprocessor can draw a current of up to 10 A. In the power-down mode the microprocessor can maintain its state with a current of as little as 100 μA (i.e. as much as 100,000 times less than in the power-up mode). A power supply, such as a battery, typically supplies the current to the microprocessor through a voltage regulator. The time in which the voltage regulator can go from delivering the proper voltage for the current required in the power-down mode to delivering the proper voltage for the current required in the power-up mode, and vis versa, is the transient response time of the voltage regulator. The large change in current demand of the microprocessor, which is the load of the voltage regulator, may bring the voltage regulator out of regulation during the transient response.

The stability of the voltage regulator is primarily dependent on the size of its compensation capacitor, its load capacitor, and its pass element. The compensation capacitor is the capacitor put in at the gain stage of the voltage regulator to compensate the phase shift of the voltage regulator, and hence prevent oscillation. A larger compensation capacitor increases the stability of the voltage regulator. The size of this capacitor is inversely proportional to the bandwidth of the voltage regulator, and directly proportional to the transient response time of the voltage regulator. The larger the compensation capacitor the more stable the voltage regulator, and, unfortunately, the smaller the bandwidth of the voltage regulator. The smaller bandwidth does not allow the voltage regulator to respond quickly to large changes in current demand, increasing the transient response time.

Additionally, since the stability of the voltage regulator is dependent on the load capacitor as well as the compensation capacitor, as the load capacitor is reduced the voltage regulator becomes less stable. A smaller load capacitor is both easier to use and easier to recycle after the circuit is no longer needed, however it reduces the stability of the voltage regulator. The decrease in the load capacitor can be compensated by an increase in the compensation capacitor to ensure the stability of the circuit. However, as discussed above, an increase in the compensation capacitor reduces the bandwidth of the voltage regulator, and therefore increases its transient response time.

In some configurations proposed circuits have changed the bandwidth of the voltage regulator when the feedback loop of the voltage regulator indicated that the voltage regulator is out of regulation because of the large change in current demand. Alternative proposals have suggested monitoring circuits that could monitor the current demand of the load and notify the voltage regulator after there is a change in the current demand of the load.

A problem with the above methods is that during the time that the change in current demand is going through the feedback loop, or by the time the monitoring circuit detects that the current demand of the load has changed, the load is not receiving the appropriate voltage. The present inventor has observed that another problem is that during the time it takes to detect the change in the current demand the load is not receiving the proper voltage due to the large current demand, the voltage regulator does not know that it is not delivering the required voltage and has not even changed its bandwidth, thus increasing the transient response time by this amount of time.

Further background on voltage regulators and on stability criteria of analog devices can be found in Grebene, Alan B., BIPOLAR AND MOS ANALOG INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1984; Gray, Paul R. and Robert G. Meyer, ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF ANALOG INTEGRATES CIRCUITS, 2nd ed., John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1984; Franklin, Gene F. et al., FEEDBACK CONTROL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1986; SGS-THOMSON, Microelectronics, Inc. databooks for voltage regulators, for linear ICs, and for automotive products; and National Semiconductor databooks, datasheets and application notes for voltage regulators, all incorporated herein by this reference.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present application discloses methods and circuits for reducing the transient response time of a voltage regulator when the load attached to it is entering or exiting a lower power consumption level, without compromising the stability of the voltage regulator. A control device is connected to both a voltage regulator and a dynamic load. When the control device senses that the dynamic load should change its power consumption level it sends a signal to a regulation means in the voltage regulator to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator to be able to deliver the required voltage in the shortest possible time. At the same time (or shortly thereafter, depending on the requirements of the system) the control device sends a signal to the dynamic load to change its power consumption level. In one sample embodiment of the invention, after the voltage regulator starts delivering the required voltage the regulating means returns the bandwidth of the voltage regulator to the optimal bandwidth for the dynamic load connected to the voltage regulator.

In one embodiment of the invention the regulating means includes a way of switching the compensation capacitor in or out when the control device signals the voltage regulator to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator. In another sample embodiment of the invention the regulating means includes a switched capacitor that changes the bandwidth of the voltage regulator when the current demand of the load is about to change.

One advantage of the present invention is that the bandwidth of a voltage regulator can be increased in order to reduce the voltage regulator's transient response, without compromising the voltage regulator's stability.

Another advantage of this invention is that there is no delay time from the time the current requirement of the dynamic load increases until the time the bandwidth of the voltage regulator increases, to allow the voltage regulator to deliver the required voltage faster.

A further advantage of this invention is that it allows a load to enter the power-down mode faster, reducing the power consumed by the load.

Another advantage of this invention is that it allows the use of a smaller load capacitor without compromising the stability of the voltage regulator.

A particularly advantageous use of the current invention is in battery-powered, portable computers. The improved transient response time of the voltage regulator allows aggressive power-conservation strategies in which the microprocessor frequently enters sleep mode.

Other advantages and objects of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having reference to the following specification together with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a electrical system of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a computer.

FIG. 3 is a timing diagram of the electrical system of the present invention.

FIGS. 4a, <b>4</b>b, and <b>4</b>c are schematic diagrams of a voltage regulator formed according to embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a voltage regulator formed according to another embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a voltage regulator formed according to another embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring to FIG. 1 an electronic system, such as a computer shown in FIG. 2, which uses a power supply including a voltage regulator according to the preferred embodiment of the invention will now be described. A power source <b>46</b>, such as a battery, supplies a constant unregulated voltage to the voltage regulator <b>40</b> through the first input <b>50</b> of the voltage regulator. A first line <b>66</b> connects the output <b>48</b> of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to the first input of a dynamic load <b>44</b>.

The dynamic load <b>44</b> can be any component of the computer that can operate at either of at least two power consumption levels, one of which is preferably a sleep or power-down mode. A microprocessor can be used as a typical dynamic load <b>44</b>. Many microprocessors now manufactured can operate at both a power-up mode and a power-down mode. Additionally, because microprocessors consume a significant amount of power it is advantageous to bring the microprocessor into a power-down mode when it is not being accessed. The dynamic load <b>44</b> (hereinafter referred to as microprocessor <b>44</b>), has a second input connected via the second line <b>62</b> to the first output of a control device <b>42</b>. A third line <b>64</b> connects a second output of the control device <b>42</b> to the second input <b>52</b> of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>.

The control device <b>42</b> has a sensing means that detects whether the microprocessor <b>44</b> needs to be accessed, for example when there is an input on one of the input devices, such as a keystroke, or when the microprocessor needs to access a drive. The sensing means is typically an integrated circuit dedicated to monitoring access to the microprocessor, e.g. such as a keyboard monitoring circuit or an application specific integrated circuit dedicated to monitoring access to the microprocessor, both of which are well known in the art.

FIG. 3 shows the logic states of the input line <b>70</b> to the control device <b>42</b> and first <b>66</b>, second <b>62</b>, and third <b>64</b> lines that connect some of the elements of the electronic system. Referring to FIG. <b>2</b> and FIG. 3 simultaneously, one sample operation of the system will now be described. At time t₁the microprocessor <b>44</b> is in the power-down mode and one of the components of the computer signals that the microprocessor <b>44</b> needs to be accessed. At t₂the sensing means senses that the microprocessor needs to be accessed, typically by a change in the logic state of the input line <b>70</b>, the third line <b>64</b> goes from the first logic state at which it is normally kept, preferably low, to a second logic state, preferably high. This signals the regulating means, connected to the second input <b>52</b> of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>, to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> from a first bandwidth to a second bandwidth. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, when the dominant pole of the voltage regulator is produced by the compensation capacitor, the second bandwidth is higher than the first bandwidth, although under other circumstances it may be advantageous for the first bandwidth to be higher than the second bandwidth.

The first and second bandwidths are dependent on the desired operation of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> and of the microprocessor <b>44</b>. In the power-down mode the microprocessor <b>44</b> draws very little current, in the present technology the microprocessor typically draws 100 μA in the power-down mode. When the microprocessor <b>44</b> wakes up, i.e. exits the power-down mode and powers up, it starts to draw much more current, in modern technology a typical microprocessor may require as much as 10 A. The time period within which the voltage regulator needs to respond to this increase in current, i.e. the transient time, is usually short, on the order of 1 μsec with current microprocessors. The first bandwidth is chosen based on the desired stability of the voltage regulator, and typically is low. The stability of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> is dependent on the compensation capacitor, which is typically 10 pF to 100 pF, and the load capacitor, which is a combination of the capacitance of the microprocessor and any capacitors in parallel with the microprocessor <b>44</b> connected to the output of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>. The capacitance of the microprocessor <b>44</b> is typically very small compared to the capacitor in parallel with it and is thus practically negligible. Therefore, the load capacitor can be fairly accurately approximated by the capacitor across the output of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>, which can typically be between 0.1 μF to 100 μF.

A smaller load capacitor is both easier to use and is more environmentally friendly, i.e. easier to recycle after it is not needed, however it reduces the stability of the voltage regulator. The decrease in the load capacitor can be compensated by an increase in the compensation capacitor to ensure the stability of the circuit, i.e. as the load capacitor is reduced the compensation capacitor should be increased. Unfortunately increasing the compensation capacitor reduces the bandwidth of the voltage regulator, and therefore increases its transient response time. However, since the bandwidth is also dependent on the load capacitor compensation of the load capacitor is typically needed since a small load capacitor produces a higher bandwidth, which may cause instability.

The first bandwidth is chosen to insure the stability of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> based on the above relationship of the compensation capacitor and the load capacitor, and also on the capacitance of the passive element of the voltage regulator. For example, the first bandwidth can be on the order of one to several kiloHertz. The second bandwidth is chosen to allow the voltage regulator to quickly respond to the large change of current demand by the microprocessor, thus reducing the transient time. For example, for a current step of five orders of magnitude, described above, with the transient time being about 10 μsec, the second bandwidth can be in the range of 100 kHz to 1 MHz.

Referring still to FIG. <b>2</b> and FIG. 3 simultaneously, at t₃, the control device <b>42</b> changes the logic state of the second line <b>62</b> from the first logic state to the second logic state, signaling the microprocessor <b>44</b> to exit out of the power-down mode. This can occur at the same time as the logic state on the third line <b>64</b> changes, signaling the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to change the bandwidth, making t₃equal to t₂, or a short period of time, for example 200 nsec, after the logic state on the third line <b>64</b> changes. Although this brings the voltage regulator <b>40</b> out of regulation, the microprocessor <b>44</b> drawing the higher current produces the same effect and the change in bandwidth allows the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to respond to the higher current demand more quickly, thus reducing the amount of time the microprocessor <b>44</b> is not getting the required voltage. In the example above the change in bandwidth is from a lower to a higher bandwidth to shorten the transient response time, although in other circumstances the bandwidth can be reduced instead of increased to produce the same effect.

When the voltage regulator <b>40</b> starts to deliver the required voltage to the microprocessor <b>44</b>, at t₄, the logic state of the third line <b>64</b> goes back to the first logic state. Preferably the control means <b>42</b> changes the logic state of the third line <b>64</b> back to the first logic state after a known time interval. One skilled in the art can calculate the time interval from t₂, the time the microprocessor requires a higher current, until t₄, the time at which the voltage regulator starts to deliver the voltage required by the load, based on the bandwidth of the voltage regulator, the load capacitor, the input voltage of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>, and the properties of the microprocessor <b>44</b>, such as the rate at which the microprocessor's current demand changes. However, the control means <b>42</b> can change the logic state of the third line <b>64</b> based on any known means of detecting that the required voltage is being delivered, such as: monitoring the microprocessor <b>44</b> through a monitoring circuit that can sense that the microprocessor is receiving the required load, or monitoring the voltage regulator <b>40</b> through its feedback loop.

The voltage regulator <b>40</b> can now either remain at the second bandwidth or the regulating means can change its bandwidth either back to the first bandwidth, or to a third bandwidth that is optimal for the size of the load capacitor. A larger load capacitor can lower the bandwidth that allows the load to continue drawing the required current and the proper voltage without oscillating. The compensation capacitor of the voltage regulator shifts the position of the pole produced by the load capacitor to increase the stability of the voltage regulator. Therefore, if the compensation capacitor is large enough to compensate for the load, the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> can be returned to the first bandwidth, otherwise a second compensation capacitor that would produce a third bandwidth can be selected. The third bandwidth is based on the need for a bandwidth high enough to permit the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to deliver the required current and the proper voltage, yet keep the bandwidth as low as possible, to enhance the stability of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>. Therefore, a second value for the compensation capacitor can be selected to optimize a bandwidth for the size of the load capacitor.

The transition into the power-down mode follows a similar process. The time t₅at which the microprocessor should enter the power-down mode is typically determined through the operating system monitoring the access to the microprocessor and determining that there has been no request to access it for a specific amount of time. At t₅the sensing means of the control device <b>42</b> senses that the microprocessor should enter the power-down mode, typically by a change in the logic state of the input line <b>70</b> generated by the operating system. At time t₆, control device <b>42</b> changes the logic state on the third line <b>64</b> from the first logic state (preferably low) at which it is normally kept to a second logic state (preferably high). This signals the regulating means, connected to the second input <b>52</b> of the voltage regulator, to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> from the first or third bandwidth at which it is operating to the second bandwidth.

At t₇, the control device <b>42</b> changes the logic state of the second line <b>62</b> from the second logic state to the first logic state, signaling the microprocessor <b>44</b> to enter into the power-down mode. This can occur at the same time as the logic state on the third line <b>64</b> changes, signaling the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to change its bandwidth, making t₇equal to t₆, or a short period of time, for example 200 nsec, after the logic state on the third line <b>64</b> changes. The higher bandwidth allows the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to respond to the reduction in the current demand quicker, reducing the amount of time the microprocessor <b>44</b> is getting too much current.

When the voltage regulator <b>40</b> starts to deliver the required voltage to the microprocessor <b>44</b>, at t₈, the logic state of the third line <b>64</b> goes back to the first logic state. Preferably the control means <b>42</b> changes the logic state of the third line <b>64</b> back to the first logic state after a known time interval. One skilled in the art can calculate the time interval from t₆, when the microprocessor requires a lower current, to t₈, the time at which the voltage regulator <b>40</b> starts to deliver the proper voltage, based on the same criteria that the interval from t₂to t₄is calculated, i.e. bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>, the load capacitor and the properties of the microprocessor <b>44</b>. However, this can also be done by any known means of detecting that the current and voltage required by the load are supplied. Some examples such means are: monitoring the microprocessor <b>44</b> through a monitoring circuit that can sense that the microprocessor <b>44</b> is receiving the required current and voltage, or monitoring the voltage regulator <b>40</b> through its feedback loop. The voltage regulator <b>40</b> can now either remain at the second bandwidth or the regulating means can change its bandwidth back to the first bandwidth.

Referring to FIG. 4a, one embodiment of voltage regulator <b>40</b> with a regulating means for regulating the bandwidth is now described. A reference voltage generator <b>80</b> is connected between ground, the power source <b>46</b>, and the non-inverting input of the error amplifier <b>82</b>. The error amplifier <b>82</b> compares the voltage generated by the voltage reference <b>80</b> and a scaled output voltage of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>. The error amplifier <b>82</b> drives the gain stage <b>84</b>. The gain stage <b>84</b> drives the pass element <b>85</b>. Resistors <b>86</b> and <b>88</b> form a voltage divider used to scale the output voltage of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to allow it to be fed back to the inverting input of the error amplifier <b>82</b>.

The regulating means is typically in the gain stage <b>84</b> of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>. In this embodiment the gain stage <b>84</b> includes an amplifier <b>90</b>, a resistor <b>92</b>, and a first capacitor <b>94</b>, configured as a differentiator. The first capacitor <b>94</b> is the compensation capacitor. The gain stage <b>84</b> also includes a first analog switch <b>96</b>. In the preferred embodiment of the invention the analog switched is connected in the manner where it minimizes the charge injection of the analog switch <b>96</b>. For example in the embodiment of the regulating means shown in FIG. 4a, the analog switch <b>96</b> is connected between the resistor <b>92</b> and the output of the amplifier <b>90</b>. The first capacitor <b>94</b> compensates the voltage regulator <b>40</b> increasing its stability, but decreasing its bandwidth. At t₂and t₅, when the control device <b>42</b> signals to the regulating means to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator when the microprocessor is about to change levels of power consumption, the analog switch <b>96</b> is opened. This changes the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to the second bandwidth, thereby shortening the time in which the voltage regulator <b>40</b> can begin to deliver the required voltage, i.e., reducing the transient response time. At t₄and t₈, when the voltage regulator <b>40</b> is delivering required voltage, the analog switch <b>96</b> is closed, returning the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to the first bandwidth. Although a differentiator is used in the example above, an integrator, as shown in FIG. 4b, or combination of a differentiator and integrator, as shown in FIG. 4c, can be used to control the bandwidth of the voltage regulator.

In an alternative embodiment a second capacitor <b>98</b> is connected in parallel with the first capacitor <b>94</b>, as illustrated in FIG. 5. A second analog switch <b>100</b> is connected the output of the amplifier <b>90</b> and the second capacitor <b>98</b>. At t₄, when the voltage regulator <b>40</b> starts delivering the proper voltage, and it is preferable to leave the voltage regulator at the third bandwidth instead of the first bandwidth to insure that it continues delivering the required voltage, the second analog switch <b>100</b> instead of the first analog switch <b>96</b> is closed.

When different dynamic loads can be attached in turn to the output of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>, additional capacitors <b>102</b> and analog switches <b>104</b> can be added. Since the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> varies based on the size of the compensation capacitor, the capacitors can be designed to tailor the bandwidth to the optimum bandwidth for a particular load, and the capacitor associated with a particular load can be switched in when a particular dynamic load <b>44</b> is attached. At t₄, when the voltage regulator <b>40</b> starts delivering required voltage, the analog switch corresponding to the capacitor than produces the optimum bandwidth for the particular dynamic load <b>44</b> is closed.

Referring to FIG. 6, in another alternative embodiment of the invention, the regulating means includes a switched capacitor <b>112</b> connected between the first capacitor <b>94</b> and the output of the amplifier <b>90</b>. A frequency divider <b>116</b> is connected via multiple lines <b>64</b>₁. . . <b>64</b>_Nto the control device <b>42</b>. The number of lines connecting the frequency divider <b>116</b> and the control device <b>42</b> is equal the number of different dynamic loads that can be connected in turn to the voltage regulator. The frequency divider <b>116</b> controls the multiplexer <b>114</b>, which in turn controls the switched capacitor <b>112</b>. The operation of switched capacitors such as switched capacitor <b>112</b> is described in copending application Ser. No. 08/536,436 (Attorney's Docket No. 95-L-119) filed Sep. 29, 1995, incorporated herein by reference, said application assigned to SGS-THOMSON Microelectronics, Inc..

At t₂and t₅the control device <b>42</b> signals to the regulating means to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator by changing the logic state on the line corresponding to the connected dynamic load <b>44</b>. The frequency divider <b>116</b> supplies the multiplexer <b>114</b> with the frequency which will produce a bandwidth at which the transient response time would be shortest for the particular dynamic load <b>44</b>, this will typically be a high frequency in order to produce a high bandwidth. The multiplexer <b>114</b> then sets the effective resistance of the switched capacitor <b>112</b> to this frequency. This changes the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to the second bandwidth, thereby reducing the time it takes voltage regulator <b>40</b> to begin to deliver the required voltage, i.e., reducing the transient response time.

At t₄and t₈, when the voltage regulator <b>40</b> is delivering required voltage, the control device <b>42</b> can again signal to the regulating means to change the bandwidth of the voltage regulator by changing the logic state on the line corresponding to the connected dynamic load <b>44</b>. The frequency divider <b>116</b> supplies the multiplexer <b>114</b> with the frequency which will produce the optimal bandwidth for the particular dynamic load <b>44</b>. The multiplexer <b>114</b> then sets the effective resistance of the switched capacitor <b>112</b> to this frequency, thereby changing the bandwidth of the voltage regulator <b>40</b> to either the first of third bandwidth.

Therefore the invention allows a quick response to the large increase or decrease in current required by the microprocessor <b>44</b> of a voltage regulator <b>40</b> when the microprocessor <b>44</b> is changing its level of power consumption. This is accomplished without compromising the stability of the voltage regulator <b>40</b>. This s particularly advantageous for systems where a component can enter a power-down mode to reduce its power consumption, such as: battery operated systems where the reduction of power consumption will lead to an increase in battery life, “green” PCs designed to consume less power in an effort to allow more people access to computers without requiring an increase in generated power, and in an effort to preserve natural resources.

While the invention has been specifically described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the prior art having reference to the current specification and drawings that various modifications may be made and various alternatives are possible therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

For example:

Although the control means is described as being a located outside of the microprocessor, it can be located inside the microprocessor but would remain active when the microprocessor is in the power-down mode.

Additionally, the control device can be any of the various microprocessor auxiliary chips, e.g. chips which include voltage or power-monitoring functions.

While the dynamic load is described as a microprocessor, any other component that can operate in at least two power consumption levels may be used.

Although only one power-down mode is described, the load can operate at several power-down modes.

While the voltage source is described as a battery, any power source may be used.

Additionally while the system is described using a linear voltage regulator a switched regulator may be used without departing from the scope of the invention.

Furthermore, while the invention is described with relation to a computer, the invention can be used in a the electrical system of an automobile, or any other system where a it is advantageous to place at least one of the system's component into a power-down mode to reduce the amount of power consumed by the system, without departing from the scope of the invention.