High surface area, nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxides with controlled solid-pore architectures and method for production thereof
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
Nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxide materials aerogels and ambigels are prepared by altering the method for removing pore liquid from manganese oxide gels. By removing pore fluid under conditions where capillary forces are substantially absent, materials exhibiting a desired high mesoporosity and high surface area can be obtained.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 13 October 2020, 5.9 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
21 claims: 7 independent, 14 dependent
- 1A method for preparing high surface area, nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxide material with controlled solid-pore architecture comprising:removing pore fluid from a gel of manganese oxide material under conditions in which capillary forces are low or extremely low to thereby form said material.
- 14Broadest claimClaim Score 98, very broad(NHIP)An ambigel of a manganese oxide material, said material being prepared from a cryptomelane sol of manganese oxide materials.
- 15An ambigel of a manganese oxide material, said material being prepared from a birnessite sol of manganese oxide materials.
- 16An aerogel of a manganese oxide material, said material being prepared from a cryptomelane sol of manganese oxide materials.
- 17An aerogel of a manganese oxide material, said material being prepared from a birnessite sol of manganese oxide materials.
- 18A high surface area, nanoscale material suitable for use as a battery electrode, comprising an ambigel of a manganese oxide polymorph material.
- 20A high surface area, nanoscale material suitable for use as a battery electrode, comprising an aerogel of a manganese oxide polymorph material.
Independent claims7
47 paragraphs in 5 sections, as filed
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
0001The present invention relates to methods for making high surface area, nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxide materials with controlled solid-pore architecture.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
0002Manganese oxide materials (as used herein, manganese oxide materials are denoted as MnO<sub>2</sub>, but refers to all species of manganese oxide compounds including, but not limited to: MnO<sub>2</sub>, MnO<sub>x</sub>, MnO<sub>x</sub>. yH<sub>2</sub>O, or MnO<sub>x</sub>H<sub>y</sub>, where x=1.5 to 2.5 and y=0.5 to 2, doped manganese oxides, and AMnO<sub>2 </sub>where A= alkali-metal or alkaline-earth cations) have long been explored for use as cathode materials for batteries, and manganese oxide is used in the familiar 1.5-volt commercial Zn/MnO<sub>2 </sub>alkaline cells (Chabre et al.,1995). More recently, manganese oxide materials have been studied as intercalation hosts for lithium batteries (Thackeray, 1997), which can provide voltages of 3 to 5 volts. The intense interest in manganese oxide as a battery material is because of its low cost and low toxicity relative to other high performance metal oxide battery materials such as NiO<sub>2</sub>, CoO<sub>2</sub>, and V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>.
0003The discharge processes at MnO<sub>2 </sub>are accomplished by the intercalation of either protons or lithium cations into the MnO<sub>2 </sub>structure. This process is accompanied by a simultaneous reduction of the manganese sites to maintain charge balance: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li id="ul0001-0001" num="0000"><ul id="ul0002" list-style="none"><li id="ul0002-0001" num="0004">MnO<sub>2</sub>+xH<sup>+</sup>+xe→H<sub>x</sub>MnO<sub>2 </sub></li><li id="ul0002-0002" num="0005">MnO<sub>2</sub>+xLi<sup>+</sup>+xe→Li<sub>x</sub>MnO<sub>2 </sub></li></ul></li></ul>
0006The protons or lithium ions intercalated into the MnO<sub>2 </sub>structure are supplied by the electrolyte at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Charge storage is further facilitated by diffusion of protons or lithium cations though the bulk of the structure.
0007Although MnO<sub>2 </sub>materials are relatively inexpensive and are currently used in commercial batteries, some problems remain, particularly with respect to lithium battery applications. For example, electrodes made from manganese oxide spinels have poor conductivity and require the addition of conductive fillers such as carbon to enhance conductivity. However, adding such fillers reduces the energy density of the electrode. Moreover, recharging the cells requires applying a voltage which exceeds the discharge terminal voltage of the cell. The result, for cells having such manganese-oxide spinel cathodes, is that it takes at least 4.1 volts (and preferably more) to de-intercalate lithium from the electrode during charging of the cell. Above about 4.5 volts, however, the solvents used as the electrolyte oxidize and decompose. It is, therefore, necessary to control the charging voltage of these cells below the decomposition potential of the solvent in order to prevent its degradation.
0008In addition, due to the crystalline structure of spinel manganese oxide, the reversible capacity and cycle life of spinel-based cathodes are sensitive to overcharge and over-discharge. Discharge of the manganese oxide spinel cells must be cut off when the terminal voltage falls to about 3.4 volts (thus limiting the capacity of the material, which typically peaks at about 140 mAh/g). Below about 3.4 volts, the spinel form of the manganese oxide undergoes structural transformation when additional lithium is inserted into LiMn<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4 </sub>and it converts to the orthorhombic form which has very poor cycle ability, and is very unstable, causing the formation of other manganese oxides which are not electrochemically active.
0009Moreover, insertion of more than one lithium ion per molecule into spinel manganese oxide results in cation mixing between octahedral and tetrahedral sites, which leads to continuous capacity decay. To avoid these problems, the cell voltage must be controlled electronically during the operation of the cell. Such control is-very difficult to manage when a number of large lithium cells are coupled together in series. Spinel-type manganese oxide electrodes typically have internal surface areas less than about 40 m<sup>2</sup>/g, which limits the rate at which they can be discharged.
0010Charge/discharge rates and the capacity achieved at those rates are in part determined by the transport of protons or lithium cations through the MnO<sub>2 </sub>structure. Sol-gel-derived manganese oxides are typically microporous, based on the tendency of MnO2 to form tunnel or layered structures. Intercalating cations must also be transported through the micropores. The small pore size can limit the accessability of electrolyte to the MnO<sub>2 </sub>interface, particularly for the large (relative to the proton) lithium cations.
0011Manganese oxide can be produced in a variety of forms, the most common form for battery materials being electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) (Chabre et al., 1995). EMD is prepared by anodic electrodeposition from manganese (II) salts. Although EMD has been used in alkaline batteries for many years, recent investigations have shown that it is not optimal for lithium battery applications (Bach et al., 1992). Some efforts have been made to improve the surface area and porosity of EMD (Kurimoto et al., 1995).
0012Manganese oxides have also been prepared by a variety of sol-gel approaches (Manthiram et al., 1998). Sol-gel chemistry provides a flexible, low temperature process for preparing metal oxides. Another advantage of sol-gel chemistry is that dopant ions can be mixed uniformly in the manganese sol to improve the electrochemical and structural properties of the manganese oxide. Under the appropriate reaction conditions, the sol-to-gel transition can occur so that the metal oxide sol forms a highly porous three-dimensional network. Removal of the pore fluid exclusively by evaporation typically collapses the porous structure due to the large capillary forces exerted on the gel structure at the liquid-gas interface.
0013If the pore fluid is removed under conditions in which capillary forces are low or extremely low, the inherent mesoporosity and high surface area of the initial gel can be retained. Aerogels are prepared by taking the pore fluid supercritical, wherein there is no longer a liquid-gas interface (Huesing et al., 1998). When supercritical CO<sub>2 </sub>drying is preferred, the pore liquid of the wet gel is replaced with liquid CO<sub>2</sub>, which is then taken supercritical. Aerogels of V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5 </sub>have been prepared that exhibit both high surface areas and high porosities (Salloux et al., 1995; Le et al., 1996; Le et al., 1995).
0014An alternative to supercritical drying is replacing the pore fluid with a low surface tension liquid, such as an alkane, and evaporating at ambient conditions. Ambient pressure synthesis of V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5 </sub>(Coustier et al., 1998; Harreld et al., 1998) and MoO<sub>3 </sub>(Harreld et al., 1998) gels (now denoted as ambigels) have been accomplished. Ambigels exhibit a porosity between that of xerogels and aerogels. V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5 </sub>aerogels and ambigels have both shown improved lithium capacities relative to xerogels derived from the same sol-gel chemistry (Dong et al., 2000).
0015Le et al., in U.S. Pat. No: 5,674,642, describe xerogels, cryogels, and aerogels of V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5 </sub>synthesized from sols and gels.
0016Lynch, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,977,993, discloses preparing metal oxide aerogels by introducing an aqueous slurry of a hydrogel into an organic solvent such as ethanol until substantially all of the water in the hydrogel is displaced by the organic solvent. The organic solvent is then treated to render it rigorously anhydrous. The organic solvent is removed therefrom by heating the mixture to above the critical point and releasing the organic solvent therefrom at a pressure at least equal to the critical pressure of the organic solvent.
0017Tillotson et al., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,275,796 and 5,409,683; describe a two-step hydrolysis condensation method to form metal oxide aerogels. A high purity metal alkoxide is reacted with water, alcohol solvent, and an additive to form a partially condensed metal intermediate. All solvent and reaction-generated alcohol is removed, and the intermediate is diluted with a nonalcoholic solvent. Aerogels are formed by reacting the intermediate with water, nonalcoholic solvent, and a catalyst, and directly extracting the nonalcoholic solvent.
0018Anderson et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,227,342, disclose making porous ceramic materials with controlled porosity by manipulating the sol used to make the material by gradually removing protons from the metal oxide sol to a predefined threshold.
0019Hupe et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,894,357, disclose that the structural and/or surface characteristics of metal oxides can be adjusted by dehydrating a water-containing oxide gel under supercritical conditions by extracting the water with an extraction agent such as carbon dioxide at a pressure above the critical pressure of the extraction agent.
0020Dasgupta et al., 5,601,952, disclose preparing lithium-manganese oxide compounds which can be used in a non-aqueous rechargeable lithium battery. A gel of lithium manganese oxide is prepared in a water-miscible organic solvent such as an alcohol. The gel is dried and, depending upon the method of liquid removal a xerogel, aerogel, sonogel, or cryogel is obtained.
0021Passerini et al., (1999) describe the preparation of MnO<sub>2 </sub>Xerogels and ambigels (hexanogels in their terminology).
0022However, to date there has been no method to obtain high surface area, highly mesoporous MnO<sub>2 </sub>with a controlled, continuously intertwined solid-pore architecture on the nanoscale.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
0023It is an object of the present invention to overcome the aforesaid deficiencies in the prior art.
0024It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxide materials with controlled solid-pore architectures.
0025It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxide materials in the form of aerogels and ambigels.
0026According to the present invention, nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxide materials are prepared using sol-gel chemistry. As used herein, manganese oxide materials are denoted as MnO<sub>2</sub>, but this use refers to all species of manganese oxide compounds including, but not limited to: MnO<sub>2</sub>, MnO<sub>x</sub>. yH<sub>2</sub>O, or MnO<sub>x</sub>H<sub>y </sub>where x=1.5 to 2.5 and y=0.5 to 2, doped manganese oxides, and AMnO<sub>2 </sub>where A=alkali-metal or alkaline-earth cations. MnO<sub>2 </sub>gels derived from the same sol exhibit markedly different final structure, based upon how the pore fluid is removed from the gel.
0027Two new classes of MnO<sub>2 </sub>materials have been prepared, in which the mesoporous structure of the initial gel is maintained by removing the pore liquid under conditions where the capillary forces that result from removal or pore liquid are either low, forming a MnO<sub>2 </sub>ambigel, or extremely low, forming a MnO<sub>2 </sub>aerogel. These materials are particularly useful in alkaline and lithium batteries.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0028<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1 and 3</figref> show the pore diameter versus incremental surface area of the various gels prepared according to the present invention for the cryptomelane and birnessite polymorphs of manganese oxide ambigels and aerogels. Manganese oxide xerogel results have been included for: prior art comparison purposes only.
0029<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2 and 4</figref> show the pore diameter versus incremental pore volume of the various gels prepared according to the present invention for the cryptomelane and birnessite polymorphs of manganese oxide ambigels and aerogels. Manganese oxide xerogel results have been included for prior art comparison purposes only.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
0030Different types of manganese oxide materials can be prepared from MnO<sub>2 </sub>gels by removing the pore liquid from the gels by methods that differ in the magnitude of liquid-vapor forces that are established in the pores, i.e., the-magnitude of capillary pressures that develop (Long et al., 2000). The choice of method for removing the pore liquid from the MnO<sub>2 </sub>gels allows one to control the final pore structure of the MnO<sub>2 </sub>gel. Classically prepared MnO<sub>2 </sub>xerogels of cryptomelane and birnessite have very high specific surface areas (˜200 m<sup>2</sup>g<sup>−1</sup>) that are concentrated in pores less than 10nm in size. The MnO<sub>2 </sub>aerogels and ambigels, as described in the present invention, have similarly high surface areas but which are distributed in a mesoporous structure with pore sizes from about 3 nm to about 100 nm. These MnO<sub>2 </sub>aerogels and ambigels also exhibit higher specific pore volumes relative to the xerogel.
0031The structure of the mesoporous network of the MnO<sub>2 </sub>aerogels and ambigels will optimize the supply of proton or lithium cation from the supporting electrolyte filling the pores to the nanoscale MnO<sub>2 </sub>domains in the gel network. Data in the electrochemical literature indicate that ionic conductivity into micropores is lower by orders of magnitude than that in open electrolyte [Koresh and Soffer, 1977]. Microporous surface area in RuO<sub>2</sub>-based anodes does not contribute to electroactivity [Ardizzone et al., 1982].
0032Another important feature of the present invention is that the MnO<sub>2 </sub>ambigels can be obtained in the form of stable monoliths, which, although collapsed to about 30% of their original dimensions; still retain a large cumulative pore volume relative to the aerogel.
0033Nanoscale MnO<sub>2 </sub>materials are typically prepared using a sol-gel method that includes reducing a permanganate or substantially equivalent compound by an organic reducing agent in aqueous solution,. as disclosed by Bach et al., 1990. The permanganate used to form MnO<sub>2 </sub>has a standard potential of about +1.7 V (versus H<sub>2</sub>/H<sup>+</sup> at 0.0 V). Therefore, any organic reducing agent with a potential less negative than +1.7 V could be used in this process, such as fumaric acid, sodium fumarate, or glucose. Dopant ions may also be dissolved in the sol. The resulting sol is then degassed under a moderate vacuum, allowed to gel-and then age. The resulting gels are rinsed with H<sub>2</sub>O and then rinsed in an oxidizing acid, such as sulfuric acid, followed by multiple rinses with water. At this point the gels can be prepared in ambigel or aerogel forms, depending on the drying procedure, as follows.
Aerogel
0034The water in the MnO<sub>2 </sub>gels, as obtained above, is exchanged for a polar solvent such as acetone or any other solvent miscible with liquid CO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, and hydrocarbons, such as amyl acetate. The MnO<sub>2 </sub>gels are then placed into a supercritical CO<sub>2 </sub>autoclave, where the solvent in the MnO<sub>2 </sub>structure is exchanged for liquid CO<sub>2 </sub>with several rinses. The CO<sub>2 </sub>is finally removed from the MnO<sub>2 </sub>gel by taking the CO<sub>2 </sub>to supercritical conditions.
0035While any liquid taken supercritical can be used for this procedure, CO<sub>2 </sub>is preferred because it is not flammable and can be taken to the supercritical state more easily than most other compounds.
Ambigel
0036The water in the MnO<sub>2 </sub>gel, as obtained above, is exchanged with a polar solvent such as acetone by rinsing several times with the polar solvent. The polar solvent is then exchanged for a non-polar solvent such as hexane. The MnO<sub>2 </sub>gels are then dried under ambient pressure conditions or under reduced pressure. <ul id="ul0003" list-style="none"><li id="ul0003-0001" num="0037">Example—MnO<sub>2 </sub>Ambigels and Aerogels</li></ul>
0038Manganese oxide gels were prepared by adding an organic reducing agent such as fumaric acid (i.e., an organic compound having a potential less negative than +1.7 V) to a vigorously stirred 0.20 M solution of NaMnO<sub>4</sub>.H<sub>2</sub>O or KMnO<sub>4 </sub>in a 1:3 molar ratio.
0039The resulting brown sol (from either the potassium or sodium permangantes) was then degassed under a moderate vacuum for eight minutes to facilitate the evolution of CO<sub>2</sub>. This degassing step ensured that high quality monolithic gels were obtained. The sol was then poured into 5-mL polypropylene molds, where gelation occurred in about one to 1.5 hours. Following a 24-hour aging step, the gels were rinsed with multiple aliquots of H<sub>2</sub>O to remove unreacted starting materials or byproducts. The gels were then subjected to a 24-hour rinse in 1M sulfuric acid, which was then followed by multiple rinses with water to remove sulfuric acid and Mn(II) salts. At this point the gels can be prepared in ambigel or aerogel forms, depending on the drying procedure.
0040Ambigels were prepared by first rinsing the gels with several aliquots of a polar solvent, in this case acetone, and then in multiple aliquots of a non-polar solvent, e.g., cyclohexane. Excess cyclohexane was poured off and the gels were either dried over two days at ambient pressure or vacuum dried at about 60° C. for 24 hours to yield very low density, fragile brown monoliths.
0041To obtain aerogels, the gels with water-filled pores were rinsed with multiple aliquots of acetone; the gels were then transferred to an autoclave where the acetone was replaced in several rinses with liquid CO<sub>2</sub>. The CO<sub>2 </sub>was then taken to its supercritical point and slowly released from the autoclave. The resulting aerogels were fragile brown monoliths.
0042All of the gels as prepared above were subsequently subjected to an annealing step in air by heating to 300° C. at 2° C./min, holding at about 300° C. for about two hours, and then cooling to room temperature.
0043Electron diffraction measurements and transmission electron microscopy confirmed that all sol-gel-derived MnO<sub>2 </sub>materials annealed to 300° C. were single-phase polymorphs, either nanocrystalline cryptomelane (KMn<sub>4 </sub>preparation) or birnessite (NaMnO<sub>4 </sub>preparation). Annealing to a temperature of 300° C., brings the gels to constant weight but does not expose them to temperatures where a crystallization transition at 550° C. to Mn<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3 </sub>occurs, as observed by differential scanning calorimetry. The surface areas and pores-size distributions were determined by N<sub>2 </sub>physisorption.
0044The following table shows micropore physisorption results for MnO<sub>2 </sub>sol-gel derived materials.
0045<tables id="TABLE-US-00001" num="00001"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="1"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="217pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="1" rowsep="1">TABLE 1</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="1" nameend="1" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry>Micropore physisorption results for MnO<sub>2 </sub>sol-gels-derived materials.</entry></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="4"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="49pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="49pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="56pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="63pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /><entry>BET Surface</entry><entry>BJH Pore Volume</entry><entry>BJH Average Pore</entry></row><row><entry>MnO<sub>2 </sub>sample</entry><entry>Area m<sup>2</sup>g<sup>−1</sup></entry><entry>cm<sup>3</sup>g<sup>−1</sup></entry><entry>Diamer/nm</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="4" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="4"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="49pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="49pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="56pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="63pt" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>Xerogel,</entry><entry>180</entry><entry>0.31</entry><entry>5</entry></row><row><entry>Cryptomelane</entry></row><row><entry>Ambigel,</entry><entry>190</entry><entry>1.1</entry><entry>25</entry></row><row><entry>Cryptomelane</entry></row><row><entry>Aerogel</entry><entry>210</entry><entry>0.80</entry><entry>16</entry></row><row><entry>Cryptomelane</entry></row><row><entry>Xerogel,</entry><entry>140</entry><entry>0.36</entry><entry>9</entry></row><row><entry>Birnessite</entry></row><row><entry>Ambigel,</entry><entry>210</entry><entry>1.6</entry><entry>29</entry></row><row><entry>Birnessite</entry></row><row><entry>Aerogel,</entry><entry>250</entry><entry>1.8</entry><entry>32</entry></row><row><entry>Birnessite</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="4" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0046BET surface area denotes the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller theory for determining surface area from physisorption data. BJH denotes the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda method for determining pore volume from physisorption data. Please note that manganese oxide xerogel results have been included for prior art comparison purposes only.
0047The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the invention that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without undue experimentation and without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. The means, materials, and steps for carrying out various disclosed functions may take a variety of alternative forms without departing from the invention.
0048Thus, the expressions “means to . . .” and “means for . . .”, or any method step language, as may be found in the specification above and/or in the claims below, followed by a functional statement, are intended to define and cover whatever structural, physical, chemical, or electrical element or structure, or whatever method step, which may now or in the future exist which carries out the recited :functions, whether or not precisely equivalent to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed in the specification above, i.e., other means or steps for carrying out the same function can be used; and it is intended that such expressions be given their broadest interpretation.
Contents5
3 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2010195268A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010195269A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US4246253A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4284618A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4476104A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4667417A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4894357A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5135732A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5156934A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5196279A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5227342A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5275796A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5395805A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5409683A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5601952A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5604057A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5674642A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5674644A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5963417A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6071486A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6071647A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| Yamamoto, et al., “Micro-rings of Manganese Dioxide Nanocrystals on Mica”, Chemistry Letters 1998, pp. 809-10. | Non-patent | – | Search report |
| Y. Chabre and J. Pannetier, <i>Progress in Solid State Chemistry</i>, 1996, 23, 1-130, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| M. M. Thackeray, <i>Progress in Solid State Chemistry</i>, 1997, 25, 1-71, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| J.J. Xu, A. J. Kinser, B.B. Owens, and W.H. Smyrl, <i>Electrochemical and Solid</i>-<i>State Letters</i>, 1998, 1, 1-3, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| S. Bach, J.P. Pereira-Ramos, N. Baffer, and R. Messina, <i>Electrochimica Acta</i>, 1992, 37, 1301, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| H. Kurimoto, K. Suzuoka, T. Murakami, Y. Xie, H. Nakamura, and M. Yoshio, <i>Journal of the electrochemical Society</i>, 1995, 142, 2150-2162, July. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| A. Manthiram and J. Kim, <i>Chemistry of Materials</i>, 1998, 10, 2895-2909, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| N. Husing and U. Schubert, <i>Angewandte Chemie—International Edition</i>, 1998, 37, 22-45, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| K. Salloux, F. Chaput, H.P. Wong, B. Dunn, and M. W. Breiter, <i>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</i>, 1995, 142, L191-L192, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| D.B. Le, S. Passerini, J. Guo, J. Ressler, B.B. Owens, and W.H. Smyrl, <i>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</i>, 1996, 143, 2099-2104, July. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| D.B. Le, S. Passerini, A. L. Tipton, B.B. Owens, and W.H. Smyrl, <i>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</i>, 1995, 142, L102-L103, June. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| F. Coustier, S. Passerine and W.H. Smyrl, <i>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</i>, 1998, 145, L73-L74, May. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| J. H. Harreld, W. Dong, and B. Dunn, <i>Materials Research Bulletin </i>1998, 33, 561-567, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| S. Bach, M. Henry, N. Baffler, and J. Livage, <i>Journal of Solid State Chemistry</i>, 1990, 88, 325-333, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Z.-R. Tian, W. Tong, J.-Y. Wang, N.-G. Duan, V. V. Krishnan, S. L. Suib, <i>Science</i>, 1997, 276, 926-930, May. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| J. Luo and S. L. Suib, <i>Journal of the Chemical Society—Chemical Communications</i>, 1997, 1031-1032, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| W. Dong, et al., “Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters,” 2000, 3, 457-459, Aug. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| J.W. Long, et al., “Electrochemical and Solid-State Letter,” 2000, 3, 453-456, Aug. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| J. Koresh, et al., “Journal of the Electrochemical Society,” 1977, 124, 1379-1385, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| S. Ardizzone, et al., “Journal of Electrochemical Society,” 1982, 129, 1689-1693, no month. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Long, Swider-Lyons, Stroud, Rolison, Design of Pore and Matter Archetectures in Manganese Oxide Charge-Storage Materials, Electrochemical and Solid State Letters, 3 (100 453-456 (200). | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Yamamoto, et al., "Micro-rings of Manganese Dioxide Nanocrystals on Mica", Chemistry Letters 1998, pp. 809-10. | Non-patent | – | Search report |
| Y. Chabre and J. Pannetier, Progress in Solid State Chemistry, 1996, 23, 1-130, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| M. M. Thackeray, Progress in Solid State Chemistry, 1997, 25, 1-71, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| J.J. Xu, A. J. Kinser, B.B. Owens, and W.H. Smyrl, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 1998, 1, 1-3, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| S. Bach, J.P. Pereira-Ramos, N. Baffer, and R. Messina, Electrochimica Acta, 1992, 37, 1301, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| H. Kurimoto, K. Suzuoka, T. Murakami, Y. Xie, H. Nakamura, and M. Yoshio, Journal of the electrochemical Society, 1995, 142, 2150-2162, July. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| A. Manthiram and J. Kim, Chemistry of Materials, 1998, 10, 2895-2909, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| N. Husing and U. Schubert, Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 1998, 37, 22-45, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| K. Salloux, F. Chaput, H.P. Wong, B. Dunn, and M. W. Breiter, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1995, 142, L191-L192, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| D.B. Le, S. Passerini, J. Guo, J. Ressler, B.B. Owens, and W.H. Smyrl, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1996, 143, 2099-2104, July. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| D.B. Le, S. Passerini, A. L. Tipton, B.B. Owens, and W.H. Smyrl, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1995, 142, L102-L103, June. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| F. Coustier, S. Passerine and W.H. Smyrl, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1998, 145, L73-L74, May. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| J. H. Harreld, W. Dong, and B. Dunn, Materials Research Bulletin 1998, 33, 561-567, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| S. Bach, M. Henry, N. Baffler, and J. Livage, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 1990, 88, 325-333, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Z.-R. Tian, W. Tong, J.-Y. Wang, N.-G. Duan, V. V. Krishnan, S. L. Suib, Science, 1997, 276, 926-930, May. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| J. Luo and S. L. Suib, Journal of the Chemical Society-Chemical Communications, 1997, 1031-1032, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| W. Dong, et al., "Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters," 2000, 3, 457-459, Aug. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| J.W. Long, et al., "Electrochemical and Solid-State Letter," 2000, 3, 453-456, Aug. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| J. Koresh, et al., "Journal of the Electrochemical Society," 1977, 124, 1379-1385, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| S. Ardizzone, et al., "Journal of Electrochemical Society," 1982, 129, 1689-1693, no month. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Long, Swider-Lyons, Stroud, Rolison, Design of Pore and Matter Archetectures in Manganese Oxide Charge-Storage Materials, Electrochemical and Solid State Letters, 3 (100 453-456 (200). | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
3 members in 3 offices
Members3
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO0230825A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| AU9676001A | Australia | A | |
| USH2121HThis record | United States of America | H |
3 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF | STCF | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- H0002121
- Application
- 9689700
Titles
- English
- High surface area, nanoscale, mesoporous manganese oxides with controlled solid-pore architectures and method for production thereof
Classification
- CPC, 5
- C01G45/024
- C01P2006/12
- C01P2006/14
- C01P2006/16
- Y02E60/10
- IPC, 1
- C01G45 02