Autonomic caching for in memory data grid query processing
Summary by NHIP
Autonomic IMDG Query Caching
The method proactively executes sub-queries alongside primary queries within an in memory data grid. This occurs when monitored CPU, memory, or request processing capacity falls below a defined threshold, allowing the system to cache results without waiting for client requests.
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
A method, system and computer program product for autonomic caching in an IMDG has been provided. A method for autonomic caching in an IMDG includes receiving from a client of the IMDG a request for a primary query in the IMDG. The method also includes associating the primary query with a previously requested sub-query related to the primary query. Finally, the method includes directing the sub-query concurrently with a directing of the primary query without waiting to receive a request for the sub-query from the client. In this way, the method can proactively predict a receipt of the request for a sub-query following a request for a primary query prior the actual receipt of the request for the sub-query.

Term
Projected expiry 11 June 2033.
- Priority and filed
- Granted
- Today
- Projected expiry
15 claims: 3 independent, 12 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 52, average(NHIP)A method for autonomic caching in an in memory data grid (IMDG), the method comprising:receiving from a client of the IMDG a request for a primary query in the IMDG;monitoring resource utilization in the IMDG;associating the primary query with a previously requested sub-query related to the primary query in response to the monitored resource utilization falling below a threshold value indicating available resource utilization, wherein associating the primary query with the previously requested sub-query comprises determining that a sub-query uses a portion of a result set from a previously requested primary query and mapping the previously requested primary query to the sub-query, wherein the previously requested sub-query is associated with the primary query in reference to fields of the primary query upon which the sub-query is based;directing the sub-query concurrently with a directing of the primary query without waiting to receive a request for the sub-query from the client in response to the monitored resource utilization falling below the threshold value;and, caching query results of the sub-query subsequent to a completion of the primary query.
- 6An in memory data grid (IMDG) data processing system comprising:a host computing system comprising at least one computer with at least one processor and memory;an IMDG disposed in the host computing system;and, a proxy cache module comprising program code enabled to receive from a client of the IMDG a request for a primary query in the IMDG, to monitor resource utilization in the IMDG, to associate the primary query with a previously requested sub-query related to the primary query in response to the monitored resource utilization falling below a threshold value indicating available resource utilization, wherein associating the primary query with the previously requested sub-query comprises determining that a sub-query uses a portion of a result set from a previously requested primary query and mapping the previously requested primary query to the sub-query, wherein the previously requested sub-query is associated with the primary query in reference to fields of the primary query upon which the sub-query is based, to direct the sub-query concurrently with a directing of the primary query without waiting to receive a request for the sub-query from the client in response to the monitored resource utilization falling below the threshold value, and to cache query results of the sub-query subsequent to a completion of the primary query.
- 11A computer program product for autonomic caching in an in memory data grid (IMDG), the computer program product comprising:a non-transitory computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code embodied therewith, the computer readable program code comprising: computer readable program code for receiving from a client of the IMDG a request for a primary query in the IMDG;computer readable program code for monitoring resource utilization in the IMDG: computer readable program code for associating the primary query with a previously requested sub-query related to the primary query in response to the monitored resource utilization falling below a threshold value indicating available resource utilization, wherein associating the primary query with the previously requested sub-query comprises determining that a sub-query uses a portion of a result set from a previously requested primary query and mapping the previously requested primary query to the sub-query, wherein the previously requested sub-query is associated with the primary query in reference to fields of the primary query upon which the sub-query is based;computer readable program code for directing the sub-query concurrently with a directing of the primary query without waiting to receive a request for the sub-query from the client in response to the monitored resource utilization falling below the threshold value;and, computer readable program code for caching query results of the sub-query subsequent to a completion of the primary query.
Independent claims3
31 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to data caching database queries and more particularly to query processing in an in memory data grid (IMDG).
2. Description of the Related Art
Database query processing refers to the receipt and execution of data queries against a database. Flat file databases generally process queries in accordance with a key used to locate matching records and to return the matching records to the requestor. To the extent that data is to be culled from different related records, a series of queries are required to located different keys in different database tables so as to ultimately return the desired set of data. Relational databases improve upon flat file databases by permitting the logical joining together of different tables so as to execute a single query against the joined set of tables in order to produce a desired set of data.
An in memory data grid (IMDG) is a highly distributable form of a database that permits parallel processing across a set of disparately located computing devices. The use of an IMDG permits substantial parallelization of database operations and, in consequence, efficient utilization of unused processing resources in each host computing device supporting the IMDG. To the extent that data in the IMDG is highly distributed, relational database concepts cannot be effectively applied. Thus, though highly scalable, database operations in an IMDG are substantially granular and numerous in comparison to that of a traditional relational database.
Traditional database technologies, including flat file and relational database technologies make extensive use of caching to enhance the performance of database queries. As it is well-known, caching is a predictive concept in which previously retrieved data resulting from one or more queries can be stored in local memory and returned, when applicable, to a requestor without requiring the re-execution of the queries against the database. Typical algorithms for determining when data is to be cached (and also evicted from the cache) includes the most frequently used algorithm and the most recently used algorithm, to name two examples.
The IMDG, however, does not make use of traditional caching, principally because of the unpredictable number of nodes in the grid supporting the IMDG and the fragmented nature of data queries across the different nodes of the IMDG. Further, to the extent that numerous small queries can be required to achieve a single relational query in the IMDG, the process of caching and cache retrieval can become unwieldy. Finally, unlike the circumstance in a relational database where the ultimate data retrieved and returned to the requestor can be readily related to the underlying query, the cascade of requisite small queries to achieve a single query results in an IMDG can cloud the connection between individual, small query results and the ultimate desired query.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Embodiments of the present invention address deficiencies of the art in respect to caching database queries and provide a novel and non-obvious method, system and computer program product for autonomic caching in an IMDG. In an embodiment of the invention, a method for autonomic caching in an IMDG has been provided. The method includes receiving from a client of the IMDG a request for a primary query in the IMDG. The method also includes associating the primary query with a previously requested sub-query related to the primary query. Finally, the method includes directing the sub-query concurrently with a directing of the primary query without waiting to receive a request for the sub-query from the client. In this way, the method can proactively predict a receipt of the request for a sub-query following a request for a primary query prior the actual receipt of the request for the sub-query.
In another embodiment of the invention, an IMDG data processing system can be provided. The system can include a host computing system that includes one or more computers each with at least one processor and memory. The system also includes an IMDG disposed in the host computing system. Finally, the system includes a proxy cache module. The module includes program code that has been enabled upon execution in the memory of the host computing system to receive from a client of the IMDG a request for a primary query in the IMDG, to associate the primary query with a previously requested sub-query related to the primary query, and to direct the sub-query concurrently with a directing of the primary query without waiting to receive a request for the sub-query from the client.
Additional aspects of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The aspects of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The embodiments illustrated herein are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown, wherein:
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a pictorial illustration of a process for autonomic caching in an IMDG;
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is a schematic illustration of an IMDG data processing system configured for autonomic caching; and,
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a flow chart illustrating a process for autonomic caching in an IMDG.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Embodiments of the invention provide for autonomic caching in an IMDG. In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, different primary queries individually can be mapped to one or more respectively different sub-queries related to the primary queries in association with an IMDG. For example, whenever a sub-query is requested in an IMDG using a portion of a result set from a previously requested primary query, the sub-query can be determined to relate to the primary query. Subsequently, when a primary query is received in the IMDG that maps to a related sub-query, concurrent with the processing of the primary query and prior to the request of the related sub-query, the mapped sub-query can be directed and results cached for use subsequent to the completion of the primary query. In this way, the related sub-query can be predictively directed without waiting for the completion of the primary query thus providing substantial temporal performance advantages.
In further illustration, <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> pictorially shows a process for autonomic caching in an IMDG. As shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, an application client <b>110</b> can direct a primary query <b>150</b> to an IMDG <b>120</b> through proxy cache <b>130</b>. The proxy cache <b>130</b> in turn can identify within query/sub-query mapping <b>140</b> one or more sub-queries <b>160</b> associated with the primary query <b>150</b>. Thereafter, concurrent with the directing of the primary query <b>150</b> upon the IMDG <b>120</b>, the proxy cache <b>130</b> can direct the sub-query <b>160</b> upon the IMDG <b>120</b> and can cache the results from both the primary query <b>150</b> and sub-query <b>160</b> for return to the application client <b>110</b>.
The process described in connection with <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> can be implemented within an IMDG data processing system. In yet further illustration, <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> schematically shows an IMDG data processing system configured for autonomic caching. The system can include a host computing system <b>220</b> that includes one or more computers each with at least one processor and memory. The host computing system <b>220</b> can be configured for coupling to one or more different clients <b>230</b> over computer communications network <b>240</b>. (Only a single client <b>230</b> shown for the purpose of illustrative simplicity). The host computing system <b>220</b> further can be configured for coupling to an IMDG that includes different nodes, each of the nodes providing a computing system <b>250</b>, a data store <b>260</b> in which data is stored, and an IMDG client <b>270</b> configured to respond to requests to store and retrieve data from the data store <b>260</b>.
An IMDG proxy <b>210</b> can execute in the memory of the host computing system <b>220</b>. The IMDG proxy <b>210</b> can be configured to receive queries directed by the client <b>230</b> to the IMDG and to process the same on behalf of the client <b>230</b>. Further, the IMDG proxy <b>210</b> can access a cache (not shown) in which query results from the IMDG can be stored prior to providing the query results to the requesting client <b>230</b>. Of note, a proxy query cache module <b>290</b> can be coupled to the IMDG proxy <b>210</b> and can execute in the memory of the host computing system <b>220</b>. In particular, the proxy query cache module <b>290</b> can include program code that when executed in the memory of the host computing system <b>220</b> can locate within a query/sub-query table <b>280</b> an association between an initial query received from the client <b>230</b> and one or more sub-queries. To the extent that one or more sub-queries can be located in association with a received initial query, the program code of the proxy query cache module can direct the one or more sub-queries to the IMDG concurrent with the directing of the initial query to the IMDG. Finally, the program code of the proxy query cache module <b>290</b> can cache results received from the initial query and one or more sub-queries for return to the client <b>230</b>.
Of import, the association between one or more sub-queries and a received initial query can be stored in the query/sub-query table <b>280</b> either manually or through an autonomic process <b>200</b> in which the association is determined programmatically. In this regard, to identify associations between sub-queries and initial queries, sub-queries directed in the IMDG can be associated through the autonomic process <b>200</b> with a corresponding initial query when the sub-queries act upon values in fields of a result produced by the initial query. Thus, over time the query/sub-query table <b>280</b> can be constructed dynamically as initial queries and follow-on sub-queries are directed in the IMDG.
In even yet further illustration of the operation of the proxy query cache module <b>290</b>, <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a flow chart illustrating a process for autonomic caching in an IMDG. Beginning in block <b>310</b>, a primary query can be received from a requesting client for data stored in the IMDG. In block <b>320</b>, the primary query can be directed for processing in the IMDG. In decision block <b>330</b>, it can be determined whether or not the processing resources of the IMDG are sufficiently available such that additional processing can be performed in addition to the processing of the primary query. In this regard, it can be determined whether the CPU utilization of the IMDG can stand additional processing of queries. Alternatively, it can be determined whether memory utilization can permit additional processing of queries. As yet another alternative, it can be determined whether request processing utilization can permit processing of additional query requests.
If it is determined that the IMDG has sufficiently available processing resources to handle additional query processing, in block <b>340</b> it can be determined whether or not one or more sub-queries can be identified as having been previously associated with the primary query. In decision block <b>350</b>, one or more sub-queries can be located that have been previously associated with the primary query, in block <b>360</b> each located sub-query can be directed for processing in the IMDG and in block <b>370</b> any results of the query can be cached as can any results received from the primary query in block <b>380</b>. Finally, in block <b>390</b> the process can complete.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may be utilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of this document, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, radiofrequency, and the like, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language and conventional procedural programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
Aspects of the present invention have been described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. In this regard, the flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. For instance, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
It also will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
Finally, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Having thus described the invention of the present application in detail and by reference to embodiments thereof, it will be apparent that modifications and variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims as follows:
Contents4
3 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11556536B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010100556A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011041006A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011072017A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011072217A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011113031A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2012158723A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2012246190A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2013019000A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2013073538A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2013262443A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US7299221B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US7793308B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US7984043B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US8271537B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20100100556A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20110041006A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20110072017A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20110072217A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20110113031A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20120158723A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20120246190A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20130019000A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20130073538A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20130262443A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
6 members in 1 office
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201213421764 | United States of America | A | |
| US201213421764 | – | – | – |
Members6
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2013246462A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US9251209B2This record | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2016117366A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US10540353B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2020089678A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US11556536B2 | United States of America | B2 |
61 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 2 non-final rejections, 2 final rejections and 1 RCE.
- Non-final rejections
- 2
- Final rejections
- 2
- RCEs
- 1
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Expire PatentEXP. | EXP. | |
| Maintenance Fee Reminder MailedREM. | REM. | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/ | PGM/ | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowedPTAC | PTAC | |
| Email NotificationEML_NTR | EML_NTR | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR | WPIR | |
| Dispatch to FDCD1935 | D1935 | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS | PILS | |
| Correspondence Address ChangeC.AD | C.AD | |
| Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084 | N084 | |
| Issue Fee Payment ReceivedIFEE | IFEE | |
| Electronic ReviewELC_RVW | ELC_RVW | |
| Email NotificationEML_NTF | EML_NTF | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=. | MN/=. | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=. | N/=. | |
| Reasons for AllowanceEX.R | EX.R | |
| Examiner's Amendment CommunicationEX.A | EX.A | |
| Interview Summary - Examiner Initiated - TelephonicEXET | EXET | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| PILOT- Request for After Final Consideration ProgramRAFC | RAFC | |
| Response after Final ActionA.NE | A.NE | |
| Electronic ReviewELC_RVW | ELC_RVW | |
| Email NotificationEML_NTF | EML_NTF | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR | MCTFR | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR | CTFR | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Electronic ReviewELC_RVW | ELC_RVW | |
| Email NotificationEML_NTF | EML_NTF | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| PG-Pub Issue NotificationPG-ISSUE | PG-ISSUE | |
| Mail Interview Summary - Examiner Initiated - TelephonicMEXET | MEXET | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129AbandonedABN9 | ABN9 | |
| Request for Continued Examination (RCE)RCEX | RCEX | |
| Workflow - Request for RCE - BeginBRCE | BRCE | |
| Mail Advisory Action (PTOL - 303)MCTAV | MCTAV | |
| Advisory Action (PTOL-303)CTAV | CTAV | |
| Interview Summary - Examiner InitiatedEXIE | EXIE | |
| Interview Summary - Examiner Initiated - TelephonicEXET | EXET | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| PILOT- Request for After Final Consideration ProgramRAFC | RAFC | |
| Response after Final ActionA.NE | A.NE | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR | MCTFR | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR | CTFR | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Sent to Classification ContractorPGPC | PGPC | |
| Filing ReceiptFLRCPT.O | FLRCPT.O | |
| Cleared by OIPE CSRL194 | L194 | |
| Oath or Declaration Filed (Including Supplemental)C602 | C602 | |
| Applicants have given acceptable permission for participating foreignAPPERMS | APPERMS | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN | SCAN | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
6 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance feeLapsedFP | FP | |
| Lapse for failure to pay maintenance feesLapsedPATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYLAPS | LAPS | |
| Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH | STCH | |
| Fee payment procedureMAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYFEPP | FEPP | |
| Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF | STCF | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 09251209
- Publication, DOCDB
- 9251209
- Publication, EPODOC
- US9251209
- Application
- 13421764
- Application, DOCDB
- 201213421764
- Application, EPODOC
- US201213421764
Titles
- English
- Autonomic caching for in memory data grid query processing
Patent term adjustment
- A delay
- +453 daysthe office missed an examination deadline
- Net adjustment
- 453 days
Classification
- CPC, 3
- G06F17/30457
- G06F16/24539
- G06F2209/5013
- IPC, 1
- G06F17 30
- USPC, 1
- 001001000