US9079367B2

Systems and methods for controlling permeability in vacuum infusion processes

Summary by NHIP

Magnetic Permeability Control

The method seals a flexible film to a tool surface and uses magnetic elements to lift the film, increasing preform permeability. A first subset of smaller magnetic elements moves sequentially under a magnetic field to relocate and treat specific preform areas.

Claim Score by NHIP

Read claim 1, the broadest

Abstract

Systems and methods for controlling permeability in vacuum infusion processes are disclosed. A system includes a tool surface, a flexible film, a preform, a magnetic field source, and a magnetic element. The flexible film has a periphery sealingly coupled to the tool surface to define a volume. The preform is disposed within the volume. The magnetic field source is configured to generate a magnetic field. The magnetic element is positioned to receive the magnetic field generate by the magnetic field source. The magnetic element is configured to move the flexible film away from the upper side of the tool surface under application of the magnetic field. A method includes generating a magnetic field with the magnetic field source and receiving the magnetic field with the magnetic element to move the flexible film away from the upper side of the tool surface, thereby increasing permeability of the preform.

US9079367B2, drawing sheet 1 — Sheet 1 of 6

Term

Projected expiry 8 July 2032.

16 claims: 1 independent, 15 dependent

1
Broadest claimClaim Score 27, narrow(NHIP)A method for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process comprising:sealing a periphery of a flexible film to a tool surface to define a volume between a lower side of the flexible film and an upper side of the tool surface;disposing a preform within the volume;providing a plurality of magnetic elements, each of the plurality of magnetic elements configured to move a portion of the flexible film away from the upper side of the tool surface under the application of a magnetic field, each of the plurality of magnetic elements moveable relative to one another in an attraction or repulsion direction of the magnetic field, and each of the plurality of magnetic elements having a relative size smaller than the flexible film overlying the preform, wherein the plurality of magnetic elements comprise a first subset consisting of one or more but fewer than all of the plurality of magnetic elements and a second subset consisting of one or more but fewer than all of the plurality of magnetic elements, and wherein the first subset is different than the second subset;and further comprising the sequential steps of: generating a first magnetic field with one or more magnetic field sources;receiving the first magnetic field with the first subset, thereby increasing permeability of at least a portion of the preform corresponding to an area of the flexible film moved by the first subset;moving the one or more magnetic field sources, thereby relocating the one or more magnetic field sources in a direction parallel to the tool surface;generating a second magnetic field with the one or more magnetic field sources;and receiving the second magnetic field with the second subset, thereby increasing permeability of at least a portion of the preform corresponding to an area of the flexible film moved by the second subset.

49 paragraphs in 6 sections, as filed

This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/376,893, entitled “MAGNETIC FIELD PERMEABILITY REGULATION IN VACUUM INFUSION PROCESSES,” filed on Aug. 25, 2010, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to vacuum infusion processes, and more particularly, to systems and methods for controlling permeability in vacuum infusion processes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Conventionally, efforts in the composites manufacturing industry have been directed toward low cost manufacturing processes such as Liquid Composite Molding (LCM). In a LCM process, a fibrous preform material is placed into a mold, which is then closed and sealed to prevent leakage before a liquid resin is injected into the mold.

One example of an LCM process is Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM). In VARTM, a single-sided mold tool is sealed by enveloping the preform material with a flexible film adhered to the tool surface with a sealant. A vacuum pump is used to draw the resin from a reservoir into the volume formed between the flexible film and the tool surface.

In the VARTM process, variations in the flexible film and base materials often cause problems during the resin infusion, which cause the infusion to be unsuccessful and the partially infused part to be thrown away as scrap. Accordingly, there remains a need to improve the infusion process of LCM.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Aspects of the present invention relate to systems and methods for controlling permeability in vacuum infusion processes.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a system for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process is disclosed. The system includes a tool surface, a flexible film, a preform, a magnetic field source, and a magnetic element. The flexible film has a periphery sealingly coupled to the tool surface to define a volume between a lower side of the flexible film and an upper side of the tool surface. The preform is disposed within the volume. The magnetic field source is configured to generate a magnetic field. The magnetic element is positioned to receive the magnetic field generate by the magnetic field source. The magnetic element is configured to move the flexible film away from the upper side of the tool surface under application of the magnetic field, thereby increasing permeability of the preform.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process is disclosed. The method includes sealing a periphery of a flexible film to a tool surface to define a volume between a lower side of the flexible film and an upper side of the tool surface, disposing a preform within the volume, generating a magnetic field with a magnetic field source, and receiving the magnetic field with a magnetic element configured to move the flexible film away from the upper side of the tool surface under application of the magnetic field, thereby increasing permeability of the preform.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawings, with like elements having the same reference numerals. When a plurality of similar elements are present, a single reference numeral may be assigned to the plurality of similar elements with a small letter designation referring to specific elements. When referring to the elements collectively or to a non-specific one or more of the elements, the small letter designation may be dropped. This emphasizes that according to common practice, the various features of the drawings are not drawn to scale unless otherwise indicated. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features may be expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawings are the following figures:

<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a diagram illustrating an exemplary system for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process in accordance with aspects of the present invention;

<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is a diagram illustrating an alternative exemplary system for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process in accordance with aspects of the present invention;

<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a diagram illustrating a workstation for implementing a vacuum infusion process in accordance with aspects of the present invention; and

<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process in accordance with aspects of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The various aspects of the present invention relate generally to a vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) system adapted to integrate a magnetic element, such as a magnetic metal element, into the mold that is responsive to a magnetic field source, such as an electromagnet, capable of generating a magnetic field. Accordingly to one aspect of the invention, when the electromagnet is positioned above the mold and switched on, the magnetic element is attracted toward the electromagnet, thereby increasing the volume within the mold, increasing the permeability of a fabric preform within the mold, and providing a faster resin infusion.

One exemplary VARTM process, referred to as a Vacuum Induced Preform Relaxation (VIPR), uses a secondary vacuum chamber to create a seal on the flexible film (outer bag) surface of a vacuum infusion process mold. Applying a vacuum to the upper side of the flexible film causes the fabric preform underneath to relax and become more permeable. An exemplary VIPR process is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/458,122, entitled “VACUUM ASSISTED RESIN TRANSFER MOLDING TECHNIQUES WITH FLOW FLOODING CHAMBER,” filed on Jul. 18, 2006, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. The present invention incorporates the use of magnets to relax a selected region to increase permeability during infusion. Incorporating magnets may provide advantages over the VIPR process discussed above, inasmuch as increasing permeability with magnetic fields does not require forming an airtight seal with the upper side of the flexible film, as does the VIPR process.

During the VARTM process, a computer controls the flow relaxation achieved by the VIPR system. Exemplary control methodologies are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/858,948, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,808,612, titled “COMPUTER CONTROLLED FLOW MANIPULATION FOR VACUUM INFUSION PROCESSES,” filed on Aug. 18, 2010, the contents of which are also incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Among other things, the '612 Patent discloses a method comprising injecting resin through a plurality of resin injection ports, detecting a plurality of resin flow fronts emanating from the resin injection ports, using a processor programmed with a predictive model to predict an effect of increase permeability in each of a plurality of locations based on the detected plurality of resin flow fronts, the predicting comprising simulating a future resin flow front based on a potential location for increasing resin permeability, and selecting a region based on the predicted effect and locally increasing resin permeability in the selected region. The control methodologies set forth in that application may be equally applied to the systems described herein, with substitution of the mechanisms for providing flow relaxation and increased permeability.

Referring now to the drawings, <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1 and 2</figref> illustrate an exemplary system 100 for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process in accordance with aspects of the present invention. System 100 is usable to increase the fabric permeability of a preform prior to infusion of resin in the vacuum infusion process. As a general overview, system 100 includes a tool surface 110, a flexible film 120, a preform 130, a magnetic field source 140, and a magnetic element 150. Additional details of system 100 are described herein.

Tool surface 110 forms part of the mold for the vacuum infusion process. Tool surface 110 has an upper side 112 and a lower side 114. The upper side 112 of tool surface 110 provides the molded shape of the finished composite material. Tool surface 110 further includes a plurality of injection ports 116 extending from the lower side 114 to the upper side 112. Injection ports 116 enable the infusion of resin into the mold for forming the composite material, as will be explained in further detail below. In an exemplary embodiment, tool surface 110 has a generally planar shape, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. However, it will be understood to one of ordinary skill in the art that tool surface 110 may be contoured, depending on the desired shape of the finished composite material. A suitable tool surface for use with the present invention will be known to one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein.

Flexible film 120 is sealing coupled to tool surface 110. Like tool surface 110, flexible film 120 has an upper side 122 and a lower side 124. A periphery 126 of flexible film 120 is sealed to tool surface 110 in order to define a volume between the lower side 124 of flexible film 120 and the upper side 112 of tool surface 110, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. Flexible film 120 is sealed to tool surface 110 using a sealant 128. Suitable sealants for use as sealant 128 include, for example, vacuum bag sealant tape supplied by Airtech Advance Materials Group of Hunting Beach, Calif. In an exemplary embodiment, flexible film 120 is formed from a non-rigid polymer material. Suitable polymer materials will be known to one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein.

Preform 130 is disposed within the volume between tool surface 110 and flexible film 120. Preform 130 includes a plurality of fabric layers positioned on the upper side 112 of tool surface 110. During the vacuum infusion process, resin permeates around and through the fabric layers to form the composite material. Suitable fabric preforms for use with the present invention include, for example, E-Glass, S-2 Glass®, aramids (e.g., Kevlar® and Twaron®) and carbon woven materials produced by Owens Corning.

Magnetic field source 140 is configured to generate a magnetic field. Magnetic field source 140 generates a magnetic field extending through at least a portion of flexible film 120. Magnetic field source 140 may be positioned above or below flexible film 120. In an exemplary embodiment, magnetic field source 140 comprises an electromagnet. The electromagnet may be switched on and off to selectively generate the magnetic field during the vacuum infusion process. The strength of the magnetic field generated by the electromagnet may desirably be adjustable in order to control the amount of movement of magnetic element 150. Suitable electromagnets will be known to one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein. However, it will be understood that magnetic field source 140 is not limited to an electromagnet, and may alternatively comprise a permanent magnet that is raised and lowered above flexible film 120 to generate the magnetic field.

When magnetic field source 140 is positioned above flexible film 120, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, it may be desirable that magnetic field source 140 be movably mounted. In particular, magnetic field source 140 is desirably movable in a direction toward or away from the upper side 112 of tool surface 110. Movement of magnetic field source 140 may be desirable to generate or accommodate for movement of flexible film 120 during operation, as will be explained in further detail below. In an exemplary embodiment, magnetic field source 140 is mounted to a pneumatic piston 180, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref>. Pneumatic piston 180 is operable to move magnetic field source 140 away from the upper side 112 of tool surface 110.

When magnetic field source 140 is positioned below flexible film 120, it may be desirable that magnetic field source be coupled directly to tool surface 110. In an exemplary embodiment, magnetic field source 140 may be incorporated within tool surface 110. Incorporating magnetic field source 140 within tool surface 110 may be desirable to simplify manufacture and/or operation of system 100.

Magnetic element 150 is positioned to receive the magnetic field generated by magnetic field source 140. Magnetic element 150 is configured to move flexible film 120 under application of the magnetic field from magnetic field source 140. In particular, magnetic element 150 moves flexible film 120 away from the upper side 112 of tool surface 110 under application of the magnetic field, in order to enlarge the volume defined by flexible film 120, and thereby increase the permeability of preform 130.

Magnetic element 150 may be any component adapted to be manipulated by a magnetic field. When magnetic field source 140 is positioned above flexible film 120, magnetic element 150 is attracted by the magnetic field generated by magnetic field source 140. Magnetic field source 140 may desirably be positioned sufficiently close to magnetic element 150 that magnetic element 150 contacts magnetic field source 140 when moving under the applied magnetic field. Further, magnetic field source 140 may be positioned in contact with magnetic element 150 (or in contact with flexible film 120).

Conversely, magnetic field source 140 may be positioned below flexible film 120, and magnetic element 150 may be a reverse polarity magnet from magnetic field source 140, such that element 150 is repelled by the magnetic field generated by magnetic field source 140. In each of these configurations, magnetic element 150 moves upward, i.e. away from tool surface 110, under application of the magnetic field from magnetic field source 140.

In an exemplary embodiment, magnetic element 150 comprises one or more metal sheets, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. The metal sheets may be formed from a ferrous material such as, for example, steel. The size of the metal sheets may be selected based on the size of the composite material to be formed and the toughness of flexible film 120. In the embodiment shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, the metal sheets are approximately ⅛ inch thick squares having approximately 4 inch sides.

In an alternative exemplary embodiment, magnetic element 150 comprises a metal wire mesh, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref>. The wire mesh may be formed from the same or similar materials as the metal sheet described above. The wire mesh may cover substantially the entire area covered by flexible film 120, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref>, or may comprise separate wire mesh portions positioned in a pattern throughout the area covered by flexible film 120. It will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the distribution of the portions, number of portions, size and geometry of the portions is not limited, but may be selected as needed by the infusion process. Use of a wire mesh may be desirable to enable flexibility of magnetic element 150 along with flexing of flexible film 120.

In another alternative exemplary embodiment, magnetic element 150 comprises one or more component magnets. Like the wire mesh, the component magnets may be positioned in a pattern throughout the area covered by flexible film 120. Suitable component magnets for use as magnetic element 150 will be known to one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein.

Magnetic element 150 is configured to move flexible film 120 due to a connection between magnetic element 150 and flexible film 120. In one embodiment, magnetic element 150 may be coupled to the upper side 122 of flexible film 120. Accordingly, when magnetic element 150 experiences an upward force from magnetic field source 140, magnetic element 150 pulls flexible film 120 upward from its upper side 122. In another embodiment, magnetic element 150 may be positioned between the lower side 124 of flexible film 120 and an upper side of preform 130. Accordingly, when magnetic element 150 experiences an upward force from magnetic field source 140, magnetic element 150 pushes flexible film 120 upward from its lower side, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. In still another embodiment, magnetic element 150 may be embedded within flexible film 120. Where magnetic element 150 is positioned beneath or embedded within flexible film 120, it may be desirable to line the edge of magnetic element 150 with a form of padding, in order to prevent or minimize damage to or stress on flexible film 120.

As set forth above, tool surface 110 includes an injection port 116 for enabling infusion of resin into the mold. Magnetic element 150 may desirably be positioned directly above injection port 116 in order to increase the permeability of preform 130 in the area immediately surrounding injection port 116.

While only one magnetic field source 140 is shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, it will be understood that the invention is not so limited. A plurality of magnetic field sources 140 and/or magnetic elements 150 may be used to increase permeability over substantially the entire area covered by flexible film 120, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein.

System 100 is not limited to the above components, but may include alternative or additional components, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.

For one example, system 100 may form part of a VARTM workstation 160 configured to implement the vacuum infusion process, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref>. Workstation 160 has the ability to spatially control the injection of resin by controlling the location of magnetic field source 140. In addition to the components of system 100, workstation 160 includes a gantry system 170. Gantry system 170 includes a plurality of linear actuators, stepper motors, and a motor controller (not shown) that are operable to move magnetic field source 140 in two dimensions to any area covered by flexible film 120. Gantry system 170 further includes a pneumatic piston 180. Pneumatic piston 180 is operable to move magnetic field source 140 in a third dimension, in a direction toward or away from tool surface 110. In a preferred embodiment, pneumatic piston 180 is operable to lower magnetic field source 140 into contact with flexible film 120 or magnetic element 150.

It will be understood to one of ordinary skill in the art that the invention is not limited to a workstation geometry as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref>. Workstation 160 may include any system configured to position magnetic field source 140 in desired locations in three dimensions above flexible film 120.

Gantry system 170 and pneumatic piston 180 are connected to a controller which controls the entire vacuum infusion process at workstation 160. The controller may use a computer program, such as a program written using LABVIEW® software (National Instruments, Austin, Tex.) or other similar software known in the art, in order to operate workstation 160. It will be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to any particular type of computer software or integrated hardware. Suitable computer hardware and associated software will be known to one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein.

<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> shows an exemplary method 200 for controlling permeability in a vacuum infusion process in accordance with aspects of the present invention. Method 200 is usable to increase the fabric permeability of a preform prior to infusion of resin in the vacuum infusion process. As a general overview, method 200 includes sealing a flexible film to a tool surface to define a volume, disposed a preform in the volume, generating a magnetic field, and received the magnetic field with a magnetic element. Additional details of method 200 are described herein with respect to the components of system 100.

In step 210, a flexible film is sealed to a tool surface. In an exemplary embodiment, the periphery 126 of flexible film 120 is sealed to the upper side 112 of tool surface 110 by sealant 128. A volume is defined between the lower side 124 of flexible film 120 and the upper side 112 of tool surface 110.

In step 220, a preform is disposed within the volume. In an exemplary embodiment, preform 130 is disposed within the volume between flexible film 120 and tool surface 110. It will be understood that preform 130 may be disposed within the volume before flexible film 120 is partially or completely sealed to tool surface 110.

In step 230, a magnetic field is generated. In an exemplary embodiment, magnetic field source 140 generates a magnetic field. Magnetic field source 140 may be switched on and off to selectively generate the magnetic field during the vacuum infusion process.

In step 240, the generated magnetic field is received with a magnetic element. In an exemplary embodiment, magnetic element 150 receives the magnetic field generated by magnetic field source 140. Under application of the magnetic field, magnetic element 150 moves flexible film 120 away from the upper side 112 of tool surface 110, thus increasing the volume between flexible film 120 and tool surface 110. As this volume increases, the spaces in between each layer of preform 130 become larger. The increase in space between the layers of preform 130 changes the manner in which resin flows is infused into (e.g. flows through) preform 130. The ability for resin to flow through a preform is called the fabric permeability. Thus, movement of flexible film 120 by magnetic element 150 increases the permeability of preform 130. Control of permeability of the fabric preform is desirable during an infusion so that successful infusion of the resin into the mold is made more reliable. To enable such control, the strength of the magnetic field generated by magnetic field source 140 may desirably be adjustable, in order to control the amount of movement of magnetic element 150.

In a preferred embodiment, magnetic field source 140 is positioned above flexible film 120. In this embodiment, step 240 comprises attracting magnetic element 150 toward magnetic field source 140 under application of the magnetic field. It may be desirable, however, that magnetic element 150 move a greater or lesser distance than that caused by application of the magnetic field alone. Accordingly, in a more preferred embodiment, magnetic field source 140 is positioned sufficiently close to magnetic element 150 that magnetic element 150 contacts magnetic field source 140 when moving under the applied magnetic field. In this embodiment, magnetic field source 140 can limit the distance moved by magnetic element 150.

In a still more preferred embodiment, magnetic field source 140 is movably mounted. In this embodiment, magnetic field source 140 may be moved downward to be in contact with magnetic element 150 or flexible film 120. If magnetic field source 140 is an electromagnet, magnetic field source 140 may be switched on only after being moved into contact with magnetic element 150. After magnetic field source 140 is moved into contact with magnetic element 150 (or flexible film 120), magnetic field source 140 is moved in a direction away from the upper side 112 of tool surface 110. Magnetic field source 140 may be moved, for example, by actuating a pneumatic piston to draw magnetic field source 140 away from tool surface 110. By moving magnetic field source 140 while magnetic element 150 is still in contact, magnets having much lower strengths may be used for magnetic field source 140 and/or magnetic element 150. Additionally, the amount of movement of flexible film 120 (and thus the permeability of preforms 130) may be precisely controlled by system 100. At the conclusion of the vacuum infusion process, magnetic field source 140 may be turned off (when it is an electromagnet), allowing magnetic element 150 to fall back toward tool surface 110 under the force of gravity.

In an alternate embodiment, magnetic field source 140 is positioned below flexible film 120. In this embodiment, step 240 comprises repelling magnetic element 150 away from magnetic field source 140 under application of the magnetic field.

Method 200 is not limited to the above steps, but may include alternative steps and additional steps, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art from the description herein.

For one example, method 200 may further include the step of infusion a polymer resin into the mold after the permeability is increased. In an exemplary embodiment, a polymer resin is infused into the volume defined by flexible film 120 and tool surface 110. The polymer resin is infused through injection ports 116 of tool surface 110. The polymer resin is injected while the permeability of preform 130 is enhanced, i.e., when the flexible film 120 has been moved away from the upper side 112 of tool surface 110 by magnetic element 150.

Once the flow front of resin reaches the periphery of the magnetic element 150, magnetic field source 140 may stop generating a magnetic field. The release of magnetic element 150 back toward tool surface 110 will force any excess resin into any remaining dry sections of preform 130. The distance between injection ports 116 can be optimized so that the flow front of resin reaches the next injection port at approximately the same time when all excess resin is disbursed.

After resin has filled the volume in the area of magnetic element 150, magnetic field source 140 may be removed from flexible film 120 and relocated over a different magnetic element 150. The process may then be repeated for an injection port 116 beneath the different magnetic element 150. During the injection process, air trapped within the volume between flexible film 120 and tool surface 110 may be ejected through a vent. Optionally, a vacuum pump may be coupled to a vent to assist in evacuating air from the volume.

Although the invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the invention.

Contents6

Every citation, both waysCites: the store holds 69 of 70

Citations
Document	Relation	Office	Cited during
EP0045555A1	Cites	European Patent Office (EPO)	Applicant
US2002022422A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2002081147A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2002155186A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2003025232A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2003111773A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2003211194A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2004049324A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
WO2004101259A2	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
US2004109909A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2005042961A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2005053765A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2005253309A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2006255500A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
WO2007040797A2	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
WO2007054101A1	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
US2007063393A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2007132142A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2007158874A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2008136060A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2009273107A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2010072677A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US2011006460A1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US2011046771A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US3339239A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US4622091A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US4902215A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5007814A	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US5052906A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5316462A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5443778A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5772950A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5885495A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5902535A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US6298896B1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US6299819B1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US6406659B1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US6406660B1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US6506325B1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US6555045B2	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US7334782B2	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US7517481B2	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US7762122B2	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US8210841B2	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US20020022422A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20020081147A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20020155186A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20030025232A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20030111773A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20030211194A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20040049324A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20040109909A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20050042961A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20050053765A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20050253309A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20060255500A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20070063393A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20070132142A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20070158874A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20080136060A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20090273107A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20100072677A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US20110006460A1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US20110046771A1	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
EP45555A1	Cites	European Patent Office (EPO)	Applicant
WO2004101259A2	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
WO2007040797A2	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
WO2007040797A3	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
WO2007054101A1	Cites	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	Applicant
International Search Report dated Mar. 20, 2012, application No. PCT/US2011/049095.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/045850, International Written Opinion mailed Jun. 23, 2011, 5 pgs.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/045850, International Search Report mailed Jun. 23, 2011, 4 pgs.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Advani, Suresh G., "Process Modeling in Composites Manufacturing", Marcel Dekker, Inc., ISBN 0-8247-0860-1 (2003), 1-19, 23-55, 150-165, 174-223.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Allende, Melquiades, "Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Flow Behavior in the FASTRAC Liquid Composite Manufacturing Process", Polymer Composites, vol. 25, No. 4 (Aug. 2004), 384-396.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Allende, Melquiades, "Characterization and Analysis of Flow Behavior in the FASTRAC Process for the Manufacture of Sandwich and Core Composite Structures", International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, vol. 48, (May 11-15, 2003), 303-311.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Alms, Justin, "Simulation and Experimental Validation of Flow Flooding Chamber Method of Resin Delivery in Liquid Composite Molding", Composites: Part A, vol. 38 (2007), 2131-2141.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Alms, J. B., "Flow Modification Process for Vacuum Infusion Using Port-Based Resin Flow Control", SAMPE Journal, vol. 45, No. 2 (Mar./Apr. 2009), 54-63.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Alms, Justin B., "Mechanical Properties of Composite Structures Fabricated with the Vacuum Induced Preform Relaxation Process", Composite Structures, vol. 92 (2010), 2811-2816.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Alms, Justin B., "In-Plane Permeability Characterization of the Vacuum Infusion Processes with Fiber Relaxation", Int J Mater Form (Mar. 2010), 9 pgs.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Alms, Justin B., "Liquid Composite Molding Control Methodologies Using Vacuum Induced Preform Relaxation", Composites: Part A, vol. 42 (2011), 57-65.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Bickerton, S., "Experimental Analysis and Numerical Modeling of Flow Channel Effects in Resin Transfer Molding", Polymer Composites, vol. 21, No. 1 (Feb. 2000), 134-153.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Bickerton, Simon, "Design and Application of Actively Controlled Injection Schemes for Resin-Transfer Molding", Composites Science and Technology, vol. 61 (2001), 1625-1637.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Bruschke, M. V., "A Finite Element/Control Volume Approach to Mold Filling in Anisotropic Porous Media", Polymer Composites, vol. 11, No. 6 (Dec. 1990), 398-405.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Correia, N. C., "Use of Resin Transfer Molding Simulation to Predict Flow, Saturation, and Compaction in the VARTM Process", ASME, Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 126 (Mar. 2004), 210-215.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Dai, J., "A Comparative Study of Vacuum-Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM) for Sandwich Panels", Polymer Composites, vol. 24, No. 6 (Dec. 2003), 672-685.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Devillard, Mathieu, "On-line Characterization of Bulk Permeability and Race-Tracking During the Filling Stage in Resin Transfer Molding Process", Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 37, No. 17 (2003), 1525-1541.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Fuqua, Michael, "A Port Injection Process for Improved Resin Delivery and Flow Control in Vacuum-Assisted Resin Transfer Molding", Proceedings of the IMECE '06, 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition (Nov. 5-11, 2006), 13 pgs.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Gokce, Alil, "Permeability Estimation Algorithm to Simultaneously Characterize the Distribution Media and the Fabric Preform in Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding Process", Composites Science and Technology, vol. 65 (2005), 2129-2139.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Hammami, Adel, "Key Factors Affecting Permeability Measurement in the Vacuum Infusion Molding Process", Polymer Composites, vol. 23, No. 6 (Dec. 2002), 1057-1067.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Hsiao, K-T., "A Closed Form Solution for Flow During the Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding Process", ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 122 (Aug. 2000), 463-475.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Hsiao, Kuang-Ting, "Simulation Based Flow Distribution Network Optimization for Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Moulding Process", Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 12 (2004), S175-S190.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Johnson, R. J., "Simulation of Active Flow Control Based on Localized Preform Heating in a VARTM Process", Composites: Part A, vol. 37 (2006), 1815-1830.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Johnson, R. J., "Enhancement of Flow in VARTM Using Localized Induction Heating", Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63 (2003), 2201-2215.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Johnson, R. J., "Active Control of Reactive Resin Flow in a Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM) Process", Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 42, No. 12 (2008), 1205-1229.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Johnson, R. J., "Flow Control Using Localized Induction Heating in a VARTM Process", Composites Science and Technology, vol. 67 (2007), 669-684.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Kasprzak, Scott, "A Robotic System for Real-Time Resin Flow Modification During Vacuum-Assisted Resin Transfer Molding", Proceedings of IMECE 2006, 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Nov. 5-10, 2006), 9 pgs.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Lawrence, Jeffrey M., "Dependence Map-Based Flow Control to Reduce Void Content in Liquid Composite Molding", Materials and Manufacturing Processes, vol. 20 (2005), 933-960.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Lawrence, Jeffrey M., "Experimental Study to Illustrate Flow Control in Presence of Race Tracking Disturbances in Resin Transfer Moulding", Advanced Composites Letters, vol. 12, No. 3 (2003), 103-112.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Lawrence, Jeffrey M., "An Approach to Couple Mold Design and On-line Control to Manufacture Complex Composite Parts by Resin Transfer Molding", Composites: Part A,vol. 33 (2002), 981-990.	Non-patent	–	Applicant
Lawrence, Jeffrey M., "Automated Manufacturing Environment to Address Bulk Permeability Variations and Race Tracking in Resin Transfer Molding by Redirecting Flow with Auxiliary Gates", Composites: Part A, vol. 36 (2005), 1128-1141.	Non-patent	–	Applicant

Showing 100 of 155

256 members in 14 offices

This recordMember, by publication datePriority claim4 more offices are in the list below

Priority claims6

Priority claims
Document	Office	Kind	Date
37689310	United States of America	P	2010-08-25
37689310	United States of America	P	2010-08-25
201113217641	United States of America	A	2011-08-25
61376893	–	–	–
US20100376893P	–	–	–
US201113217641	–	–	–

Members256

Family members, oldest first
Document	Office	Kind
AU2006243731A1	Australia	A1	2006-11-09
CA2606520A1	Canada	A1	2006-11-09
CA2676758A1	Canada	A1	2006-11-09
WO2006116870A1	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A1	2006-11-09
NO20075640L	Norway	L	2007-11-30
EP1877644A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2008-01-16
MX2007013761A	Mexico	A	2008-01-28
US2008210063A1	United States of America	A1	2008-09-04
US2009143797A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143798A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143799A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143800A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143801A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143802A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143803A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143804A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
US2009143805A1	United States of America	A1	2009-06-04
AU2008334050A1	Australia	A1	2009-06-11
CA2707837A1	Canada	A1	2009-06-11
CA2921116A1	Canada	A1	2009-06-11
CA2968143A1	Canada	A1	2009-06-11
WO2009073608A1	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A1	2009-06-11
US2009273201A1	United States of America	A1	2009-11-05
US2010000074A1	United States of America	A1	2010-01-07
US2010004668A1	United States of America	A1	2010-01-07
US2010004669A1	United States of America	A1	2010-01-07
AU2009270397A1	Australia	A1	2010-01-21
AU2009270414A1	Australia	A1	2010-01-21
CA2730562A1	Canada	A1	2010-01-21
CA2730568A1	Canada	A1	2010-01-21
WO2010006441A1	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A1	2010-01-21
WO2010006445A1	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A1	2010-01-21
WO2010007138A2	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A2	2010-01-21
WO2010007138A3	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A3	2010-04-01
EP2229104A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2010-09-22
US2011009890A1	United States of America	A1	2011-01-13
JP2011505226A	Japan	A	2011-02-24
CA2790917A1	Canada	A1	2011-03-03
US2011054506A1	United States of America	A1	2011-03-03
WO2011025857A1	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A1	2011-03-03
US7909120B2	United States of America	B2	2011-03-22
WO2011025857A9	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A9	2011-04-14
EP2313600A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2011-04-27
EP2313601A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2011-04-27
EP2313814A2	European Patent Office (EPO)	A2	2011-04-27
US2011100621A1	United States of America	A1	2011-05-05
US2011109109A1	United States of America	A1	2011-05-12
MX2011000608A	Mexico	A	2011-06-01
MX2011000612A	Mexico	A	2011-06-01
CN102089492A	China	A	2011-06-08
US2011132594A1	United States of America	A1	2011-06-09
CN102099542A	China	A	2011-06-15
US2011167619A1	United States of America	A1	2011-07-14
US2011167620A1	United States of America	A1	2011-07-14
US2011167621A1	United States of America	A1	2011-07-14
US2011172689A1	United States of America	A1	2011-07-14
US2011178542A1	United States of America	A1	2011-07-21
US2011184445A1	United States of America	A1	2011-07-28
AU2006243731B2	Australia	B2	2011-08-04
US2011190800A1	United States of America	A1	2011-08-04
US2011251632A1	United States of America	A1	2011-10-13
US2011257650A1	United States of America	A1	2011-10-20
US8042626B2	United States of America	B2	2011-10-25
CA2606520C	Canada	C	2011-11-15
EP1877644A4	European Patent Office (EPO)	A4	2011-11-16
US8061014B2	United States of America	B2	2011-11-22
CA2750482A1	Canada	A1	2012-02-25
CA2945596A1	Canada	A1	2012-02-25
EP2422721A2	European Patent Office (EPO)	A2	2012-02-29
WO2012027544A2	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A2	2012-03-01
AU2010286689A1	Australia	A1	2012-03-15
AU2011213852A1	Australia	A1	2012-03-15
US2012068382A1	United States of America	A1	2012-03-22
US2012071796A1	United States of America	A1	2012-03-22
EP2433577A2	European Patent Office (EPO)	A2	2012-03-28
EP2433578A2	European Patent Office (EPO)	A2	2012-03-28
US2012078278A1	United States of America	A1	2012-03-29
WO2012027544A3	World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)	A3	2012-05-10
US8185539B1	United States of America	B1	2012-05-22
JP2012096045A	Japan	A	2012-05-24
JP2012096046A	Japan	A	2012-05-24
HK1155787A1	Hong Kong, China	A1	2012-05-25
HK1155788A1	Hong Kong, China	A1	2012-05-25
US8197502B2	United States of America	B2	2012-06-12
EP2471080A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2012-07-04
EP2433577A3	European Patent Office (EPO)	A3	2012-07-11
EP2433578A3	European Patent Office (EPO)	A3	2012-07-11
EP2229104A4	European Patent Office (EPO)	A4	2012-07-18
US8236020B2	United States of America	B2	2012-08-07
RU2011106026A	Russian Federation	A	2012-08-27
RU2011106027A	Russian Federation	A	2012-08-27
US2012221031A1	United States of America	A1	2012-08-30
CA2774751A1	Canada	A1	2012-10-15
CA3022252A1	Canada	A1	2012-10-15
CA3022254A1	Canada	A1	2012-10-15
EP2510891A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2012-10-17
US2012277780A1	United States of America	A1	2012-11-01
JP2012223582A	Japan	A	2012-11-15
RU2467151C2	Russian Federation	C2	2012-11-20
US8333778B2	United States of America	B2	2012-12-18

Showing 100 of 256

67 transactions on the USPTO file

Allowed after 1 non-final rejection, 1 final rejection and 1 RCE.

Non-final rejections: 1
Final rejections: 1
RCEs: 1
Appeals: 0

Over time

Point at a mark for the transaction

Transactions

Prosecution transactions, newest first
	Event	Code
2023-08-21	Expire PatentEXP.	EXP.
2023-03-06	Maintenance Fee Reminder MailedREM.	REM.
2019-01-14	Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Micro EntityM3551	M3551
2015-07-14	Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/	PGM/
2015-07-14	Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowedPTAC	PTAC
2015-06-25	Email NotificationEML_NTR	EML_NTR
2015-06-24	Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR	WPIR
2015-06-10	Dispatch to FDCD1935	D1935
2015-06-09	Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS	PILS
2015-06-08	Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084	N084
2015-06-08	Applicant Has Filed a Verified Statement of Micro Entity Status in Compliance with 37 CFR 1.29MICR	MICR
2015-06-08	Issue Fee Payment ReceivedIFEE	IFEE
2015-04-22	Electronic ReviewELC_RVW	ELC_RVW
2015-04-22	Email NotificationEML_NTF	EML_NTF
2015-04-22	Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=.	MN/=.
2015-04-20	Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=.	N/=.
2015-04-17	Examiner's Amendment CommunicationEX.A	EX.A
2015-03-27	Interview Summary - Examiner Initiated - TelephonicEXET	EXET
2015-03-27	Interview Summary - Examiner InitiatedEXIE	EXIE
2014-11-12	Mail Interview Summary - Applicant Initiated - TelephonicMEXAT	MEXAT
2014-11-10	Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX	FWDX
2014-11-10	Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129AbandonedABN9	ABN9
2014-11-07	Request for Continued Examination (RCE)RCEX	RCEX
2014-11-07	Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G	XT/G
2014-11-07	Workflow - Request for RCE - BeginBRCE	BRCE
2014-11-04	Interview Summary- Applicant InitiatedEXIA	EXIA
2014-11-04	Interview Summary - Applicant Initiated - TelephonicEXAT	EXAT
2014-05-08	Electronic ReviewELC_RVW	ELC_RVW
2014-05-08	Email NotificationEML_NTF	EML_NTF
2014-05-08	Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR	MCTFR
2014-05-05	Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR	CTFR
2014-04-04	Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX	FWDX
2014-03-24	Response after Non-Final ActionA...	A...
2014-03-24	Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G	XT/G
2013-10-24	Electronic ReviewELC_RVW	ELC_RVW
2013-10-24	Email NotificationEML_NTF	EML_NTF
2013-10-24	Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF	MCTNF
2013-10-21	Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF	CTNF
2013-08-19	Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX	FWDX
2013-08-16	Response to Election / Restriction FiledELC.	ELC.
2013-07-18	Electronic ReviewELC_RVW	ELC_RVW
2013-07-18	Email NotificationEML_NTF	EML_NTF
2013-07-18	Mail Restriction RequirementMCTRS	MCTRS
2013-07-12	Restriction/Election RequirementCTRS	CTRS
2013-01-04	Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK	DOCK
2012-07-24	Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK	DOCK
2012-04-16	Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC	IDSC
2012-04-16	Reference capture on IDSRCAP	RCAP
2012-04-16	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844	M844
2012-04-16	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS	WIDS
2012-03-22	PG-Pub Issue NotificationPG-ISSUE	PG-ISSUE
2012-01-11	Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC	IDSC
2012-01-11	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS	WIDS
2012-01-11	Reference capture on IDSRCAP	RCAP
2012-01-11	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844	M844
2012-01-09	Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE	OIPE
2011-12-14	Application Is Now CompleteCOMP	COMP
2011-12-14	Filing Receipt - UpdatedFLRCPT.U	FLRCPT.U
2011-12-13	Sent to Classification ContractorPGPC	PGPC
2011-12-02	Additional Application Filing FeesADDFLFEE	ADDFLFEE
2011-12-02	A statement by one or more inventors satisfying the requirement under 35 USC 115, Oath of the ApplicOATHDECL	OATHDECL
2011-12-02	Applicants have given acceptable permission for participating foreignAPPERMS	APPERMS
2011-09-07	Filing ReceiptFLRCPT.O	FLRCPT.O
2011-09-07	Notice Mailed--Application Incomplete--Filing Date AssignedINCD	INCD
2011-08-29	Cleared by OIPE CSRL194	L194
2011-08-25	IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN	SCAN
2011-08-25	Initial Exam Team nnIEXX	IEXX

7 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC

Over the term

Point at a mark for the event

Events

Legal events, newest first
	Event	Code
2023-09-12	Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance feeLapsedFP	FP
2023-08-21	Lapse for failure to pay maintenance feesLapsedPATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: MICROENTITYLAPS	LAPS
2023-08-21	Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH	STCH
2023-03-06	Fee payment procedureMAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: MICROENTITYFEPP	FEPP
2019-01-14	Maintenance fee paymentMAFP	MAFP
2015-06-24	Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF	STCF
2011-12-02	AssignmentAS	AS

Systems and methods for controlling permeability in vacuum infusion processes

Summary by NHIP

Claim Score by NHIP

Abstract