Game server and scenario control program
Summary by NHIP
Game server scenario control
The game server manages online play by dividing scenarios into partial sections containing events requiring two or more players. A controller prohibits challengers from executing other events until a clear judger confirms the party has cleared the current event.
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
In a game server wherein a player can play a game online by operating a game terminal, and game program has two or more partial scenarios and the partial scenario has an event to be played by forming a party through two or more players, a unifier that unifies and controls scenario proceeding of the player as a challenger, a controller that controls to prohibit the unified player from executing another events, a processor that does a procedure corresponding to clearing on the player as the challenger to whom clearing of the event was judged, and a releaser that releases unification of the player classified into the challenger are provided.

Term
5.1 yearsleft in the term
Expires 4 November 2031.
- Priority
- Filed
- Granted
- Today
- Expires
11 claims: 2 independent, 9 dependent
- 1A game server connected with two or more game terminals through a communication line, through an operation of one of said game terminals, a player can play a game online according to a predetermined game program by operating his (her) own operation character in a virtual space in said game server, said game program having a game scenario which is comprised of two or more partial scenarios therein, at least one of said partial scenarios having an event to be played by a party of two or more players, wherein said partial scenario having said event has two or more sub scenarios to be executed by said players at an optional point of time in optional order in the partial scenario, and said event is set in said sub scenario; said game server comprising:a scenario proceeding controller that reads a state of event attainment of each of the two or more players in the party and classifying each player as a challenger when the player has not yet cleared said event or as an observer if the player has already cleared said event, wherein said scenario proceeding controller prohibits any of the challengers from executing other partial scenarios without having cleared said event;an event execution controller that prohibits said challengers from executing other events without clearing said event;a clear judger that, upon clearing said event by the party, judges whether or not each of the challengers have cleared said event;a clear event processor that does a procedure corresponding to clearing of said event on all said challengers to whom clearing of said event has been judged through said clear judger;a player information updater that updates said player information of all said challengers who have cleared said event as having cleared said event while not updating the player information for said observers;and a control releaser through which said respective players to whom clearing of said event has been judged can execute the other events prohibited by said event execution controller.
- 2Broadest claimClaim Score 27, narrow(NHIP)A non-transitory computer readable medium storing scenario control program in a game server computer connected with two or more game terminals through a communication line, through an operation of one of said game terminals, a player can play a game online according to a predetermined game program by operating his (her) own operation character in a virtual space in said game server, said game program having a game scenario which is comprised of two or more partial scenarios therein, at least one of said partial scenarios having an event to be played by a party of two or more players; said scenario control program for getting said game server computer to function as the following:a scenario proceeding controller that reads a state of event attainment of each of the two or more players in the party and classifying each player as a challenger when the player has not vet cleared said event or as an observer if the player has already cleared said event, wherein said scenario proceeding controller prohibits any of the challengers from executing other partial scenarios without having cleared said event;an event execution controller that prohibits said challengers from executing other events without clearing said events;a clear judger that, upon clearing said event by the party, judges whether or not each of the challengers have cleared said event;a clear event processor that does a procedure corresponding to clearing of said event on all said challengers to whom clearing of said event has been judged through said clear judger;a player information updater that updates said player information of all said challengers who have cleared said event as having cleared said event while not updating the player information for said observers;and a control releaser through which said respective players to whom clearing of said event has been judged can execute the other events prohibited by said event execution controller.
Independent claims2
50 paragraphs in 6 sections, as filed
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
The present disclosure relates to subject matter contained in Japanese patent application No. 2010-268903 filed on Dec. 2, 2010, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a game server through which many players connected via a communication line can enjoy a game online and player control program proper for use in the device (gamer server computer).
BACKGROUND ART
Recently, so-called MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game) for enjoying a role-playing game in a virtual space set in a game server with which many players are connected through a communication line is now widespread.
In such a recent RPG (role-playing game), following structure is proposed. That is, two or more game apparatuses are connected and at the time of a specific event, a battle with boss, for example, in a scenario that some player is executing, players of another apparatuses are invited to participate and the event is executed by a cooperation of two or more players (Patent related document 1 shown below, for example).
PRIOR ART
[Patent related document 1]: Japanese patent application publication No. 2010-82310
Such an inclination also appears in MMORPG, and in a battle with boss where a strong enemy is an opponent, the players who are acquainted with each other in a game space constructed in a virtual space in the game server execute a scenario (event) of the battle with boss in cooperation with another players by forming a party.
Problems to be Solved by Invention
In a conventional MMORPG, proceeding of a scenario is controlled such that an operation character to be operated by a player can freely act in a virtual space of a game server with no hindrance by another players, extremely improving a degree of freedom in the individual player's act. Therefore, even in an event, such as a battle with boss to be played in cooperation with another players, its clear flag (that is an evidence of clearing (finishing) of the battle with boss) is given to only one person of two or more players who participated in the battle with boss (for example, only operation character to be operated by the player who has a leader flag that is determined among the players participating in the battle with boss in advance).
In such a control, it is necessary to repeatedly execute the event many times changing the leader in order to obtain the flag of clearing the event for all payers who participated in the battle with boss (event), and the time is vain and funs of the game are widely damaged thereby.
An object of the invention is to provide a game server and scenario control program wherein the players having participation qualification can obtain an equal outcome in one-time play at the time of execution of an event for which the cooperation play through two or more players is necessary in an online game, such as a MMORPG, maintaining the degree of freedom of the individual player.
Means for Solving Problems
A first aspect of the invention is a game server connected with many game terminals (<b>1</b>A, <b>1</b>B, <b>1</b>C, . . . ) through a communication line (<b>2</b>), through an operation of said game terminal by each player, said player can play a game online according to a predetermined game program of said game server (<b>3</b>) by operating his (her) own operation character in a virtual space in said game server (<b>3</b>), said game program having a game scenario which is comprised of two or more partial scenarios therein, said partial scenarios being controlled to be executed in predetermined orders, at least one partial scenario of said partial scenarios having an event to be played by forming a party through two or more players; said game server comprising:
a category classifier (<b>9</b>) that classifies said players comprising said party into challengers (SR, R) who have not yet cleared said event and observers (CA) who have already cleared said event by referring to player information regarding said players stored in a memory;
a unification processor (<b>9</b>) that unifies scenario proceedings of said players who were classified into said challengers and controls said scenario proceedings regarding these players as a unit;
an event execution controller (<b>9</b>) that controls to prohibit said player classified into the challenger from executing events excluding ones to be cleared as said challenger;
a clear judger (<b>9</b>) that judges whether or not said player classified into said challenger has cleared said event to be cleared as said challenger;
a clear event processor (<b>9</b>) that does a procedure corresponding to clearing of the event on said player classified into said challenger to whom clearing of the event has been judged through said clear judger;
a player information updater (<b>9</b>) that updates said player information of said player classified into the challenger who has cleared said event into contents when clearing said event; and
a unification releaser (<b>9</b>) that releases said unification of said player classified into the challenger.
A second aspect of the invention is the game server, wherein at least one partial scenario in which said event is set has two or more sub scenarios (C<b>1</b> through C<b>10</b>) to be executed by said player at an optional point of time in optional orders in the partial scenario, and said event is set in said sub scenario.
A third aspect of the invention is the game server, further comprising a notice receiver (<b>9</b>, <b>12</b>) that receives a party formation notice from said two or more players, wherein said category classifier classifies and determines said players to whom said party formation notice was outputted.
Effects of Invention
The unification processor (<b>9</b>) unifies scenario proceedings of the players classified into the challengers and controls the scenario proceedings of these players as a unit. After clearing the event, the clear event processor (<b>9</b>) does a procedure corresponding to clearing of the event on the player as the challenger who was judged to have cleared the event. By doing so, the scenarios of all players as the challengers proceed as a unit and the procedures corresponding to clearing of the event are done as a unit. As the result, when executing the event for which cooperation play by two or more players is necessary, the participant players can equally obtain the result by one-time play at the time of the cooperation play, maintaining degree of free of each player.
The number in parentheses shows the corresponding element in the drawings for the sake of convenience, accordingly, the descriptions are not restricted and bound by the descriptions on the drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a control block diagram showing game terminals and a game server to which the invention is applied.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is a view that shows an example of a structure of a game scenario to be provided through the game server.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a typical view that shows an example of a party member table.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is a flowchart that shows an example of cooperation play processing program during game program.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
An embodiment of the invention is now explained, referring to appended drawings.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> shows two or more game terminals <b>1</b>A, <b>1</b>B, <b>1</b>C . . . (Actually, extremely many game terminals <b>1</b> exist although the figure exemplarily shows only three game terminals <b>1</b>) and a game server <b>3</b> connected with the game terminals <b>1</b>A, <b>1</b>B, <b>1</b>C via a public communication line <b>2</b>, such as the Internet and a public telephone net. Each of the game terminals <b>1</b>A, <b>1</b>B, <b>1</b>C . . . has a main body <b>1</b><i>a </i>building a computer therein and a controller <b>1</b><i>b </i>as an input device is connected with the main body <b>1</b><i>a. </i>
The game server <b>3</b> as the game server computer has a main controller <b>5</b>, and a communication controller <b>7</b> connected with the public communication line <b>2</b>, a game proceeding controller <b>8</b>, a scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b>, a program memory <b>10</b> for storing game program of MMORPG, a scenario control memory <b>11</b> and a player controller <b>12</b> are connected with the main controller <b>5</b> via a bus line <b>6</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> exemplarily shows only portions pertinent to the invention, but does not show the whole structure of an actual game server <b>3</b>.
The game server <b>3</b> as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> executes functions shown in respective blocks as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> in such a manner that a computer reads and executes game program stored in a memory, such as the program memory <b>10</b> and the other well-known control program so that a CPU or a memory (not shown) time-dividedly operates by multitask. But, it is also possible to structure the game server <b>3</b> by hardwares corresponding to the respective blocks. Otherwise, it is also possible to control each block by a CPU or a MPU dispersedly provided in each block.
The game terminals <b>1</b> and the game server <b>3</b> have the above-mentioned structures. In order to play an online game, such as a MMORPG for players, each player operates his (her) own game terminal <b>1</b> so as to connect with the game server <b>3</b> through the public communication line <b>2</b>, and executes the game in such a manner that the player operates to move an operation character that is set corresponding to each player in a virtual space formed in a memory in the game server <b>3</b> so that the operation character take an action according to a predetermined scenario controlled by the game server <b>3</b>. The game program executed by the game server <b>3</b> is stored in the program memory <b>10</b> in the game server <b>3</b>, and do main controls in the online game by executing through the game server <b>3</b>. In each game terminal <b>1</b>, the game program for controlling the terminal for executing a desired online game is stored in a predetermined memory by connecting with the game server <b>3</b>.
Game scenario SN set in the game program is comprised of a partial scenario “A”, a partial scenario “B”, a partial scenario “C”, a partial scenario “D”, a partial scenario “E”, and a partial scenario “F”, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref>. Each player is controlled to execute the partial scenarios A, B, C, D, E and F in these orders through the game proceeding controller <b>8</b>. But, the partial scenario “C” has ten sub scenarios C<b>1</b> through C<b>10</b> in parallel, and each player can execute the sub scenario at an optional point of time in an optional order in the partial scenario C. The scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> watches an execution state of the sub scenario in the partial scenario “C” every each player and the player controller <b>12</b> controls the execution state of sub scenario C<b>1</b> through C<b>10</b> of each player, that is, a clearing state in the scenario control memory <b>11</b> every each player.
In each of the sub scenarios C<b>1</b> to C<b>10</b> of the partial scenario “C”, a battle with boss is lastly set as an event after a predetermined scenario development. Unless each player beats a boss that is set in the sub scenario after participating in the battle with boss, clearing of the sub scenario is not judged. The scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> sets such an event, the battle with boss, as a cooperation play to be done by cooperation through two or more players. In order to clear the sub scenario, it is necessary for each player to contact with the operation character to be operated by another player in the virtual space in the game server and to find a partner who will fight together in the battle with boss.
That is, the player who plays an online game in the virtual space of the game server through the operation of each game terminal <b>1</b> gets the operation character operated by his (her) own to freely move and act in the virtual space so that the player can play the scenario fit for his (her) own favorites, and the game program generally controls that such actions can be executed by the operation character to be operated by each player alone. But, in the sub scenarios C<b>1</b> to C<b>10</b> comprising the partial scenario “C”, the battle with boss (event) is set in each of the sub scenarios C<b>1</b> to C<b>10</b> and the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> controls according to the game program that in the sub scenario Cx two or more players should act cooperating with each other by forming a party so as to execute and clear the battle with boss (event) (this is referred to as only “execution of cooperation game”).
Then, each player contacts with the operation character operated by another player in the virtual space in the game server through proper means, and finds partners who will fight together in the battle with boss, that is, who will play the cooperation game in order to form a party for participation in the battle with boss. If the partner who will fight together in the battle with boss is found and the party is formed, the player who participates in the party outputs a party formation notice from each game terminal <b>1</b> to the game server <b>3</b> through the public communication line <b>2</b>. The party formation notice is received by the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> and the player controller <b>12</b> in the game server that are receivers of such a notice and corresponding procedures are done according to the game program.
Receiving this, the game program starts event execution procedures in the cooperation play according to cooperation play processing program CTP that comprises a part of the game program. The cooperation play processing program CTP reads player information of members of the formed party out of a memory (not shown) through the player controller <b>12</b> based upon player ID of the members comprising the party shown in the party formation notices that was transmitted from the respective game terminals <b>1</b>, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>. And, whether or not the members the party that was formed this time have participation qualification for the participation in the battle with boss (event) to be executed from now on that is stored in the party formation notice as attribution data is judged. In order to execute the partial scenarios C<b>1</b> through C<b>10</b> and to fight in the battle with boss that is the event set for clearing, it is necessary for all players comprising the party members to clear the partial scenarios A and B. This is because in order to prevent a failure of the scenario proceeding of the whole game program, the game proceeding controller <b>8</b> controls not to execute the partial scenario C unless the player clears the partial scenarios A and B. Even if the player who has already cleared the partial scenario C and proceeded to the partial scenario D or later, there may be a danger of failure of the scenario proceeding. Then, the execution of the partial scenario C by the player is restricted by the game proceeding controller <b>8</b>.
After judging the existence of the event participation qualification for all players (members) comprising the party in step S<b>1</b>, the program proceeds to Step S<b>2</b> of the cooperation play processing program CTP and the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> reads a state of event attainment of each of the players comprising the party members shown in the party formation notice out of a memory (not shown) so as to determine a category of each player in the event that the party tries to execute this time. In the category of the player, the players are classified into the players who have not yet cleared the event to be executed by the party this time and the players who have already cleared such an event, and the player who have not yet cleared is classified into a category of challenger PC<b>1</b> and the player who have already cleared is classified into a category of observer PC<b>2</b>.
Subsequently, the cooperation play processing program CTP proceeds to Step S<b>3</b>, and the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> processes so as to prepare a party member table PMT in the scenario control memory <b>11</b>. As already mentioned above, it is possible to easily read the state of event attainment of each player since a memory (not shown) in the game server <b>3</b> stores the states of attainment (clearing) of the respective partial scenarios (events) A to F and the states of attainment (clearing) of the respective sub scenarios (events) C<b>1</b> to C<b>10</b> of the partial scenario C for all players accessible to the game server <b>3</b> as player information together with the player ID.
That is, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> prepares the party member table PMT in the scenario control memory <b>11</b> as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref>, and the party member table PMT stores sub scenario name SUN of the event that will be executed from now on by the party shown in the party formation notice, the player ID <b>14</b> of the player comprising the party, and the challenger PC<b>1</b> and the observer PC<b>2</b> as the categories of the players. The challenger PC<b>1</b> is further classified into “R” that shows a leader and “SR” that shows a sub leader, and the observer PC<b>2</b> is shown as “CA” and “CA” is stored. The leader and sub leader that are categories of the challenger PC<b>1</b> show the players who have not yet cleared the sub scenario event that the party will execute from now on, and the observer PC<b>2</b> is the player who has already cleared the sub scenario event (but, has not yet proceed to the partial scenario D or later. The players that comprise the party members can determine the leader and the sub leader upon deliberation and the leader and the sub leader are shown as the attribution data of the party formation notice transmitted from each game terminal <b>1</b> to the game server <b>3</b>. And, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> judges whether the player is the challenger or the observer by referring to the above-mentioned player information.
After thus preparing the party member table PMT, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> does a procedure for unifying the scenario proceeding in connection with the challengers in Step S<b>4</b> of the cooperation play processing program CTP for the players that are classified into the categories of the leader and the sub leader of the party member table PMT, that is, for the players who are regarded as the challengers. The scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> controls the players whose scenario proceeding has been unified in such a manner that the respective players comprising the unit take actions as a unit and the action outcome can be equally distributed to the leader and the sub leader comprising the unit until the unification is released.
Concretely speaking, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> controls such that the event of the sub scenario Cx (x=one of 1 to 10) to be executed from now on that has notified the game server <b>3</b> by the player who is the challenger (the operation character) through the party formation notice, that is, the event of the sub scenario Cx to be cleared as the challenger is fixedly set as the scenario (event) to be executed by the challenger and the executions of the other sub scenarios (events) and the partial scenarios D through F after the partial scenario C are prohibited to be executed. No unification of the scenarios is done and no action control in connection with the scenario proceeding is done for the player who was classified into the category of “observer” who has already cleared the sub scenario Cx, for example, for the player whose ID is “90438” in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref>.
The players who thus formed the party (referred to as “party player”) enter Step S<b>5</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, and start to execute the sub scenario shown in the formation notice, for example, the sub scenario C<b>6</b> and fight in the battle with boss set in the sub scenario C<b>6</b>.
The scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> judges whether the party player cleared the sub scenario C<b>6</b> or not in Step S<b>6</b> of the cooperation play processing program CTP. If the clearing of the sub scenario C<b>6</b> was judged, the program proceeds to Step S<b>7</b>, and a clear flag of the sub scenario C<b>6</b> is given to all players who have been classified into the challengers of the party players as a lump. On this occasion, the clear flag is not given to the players who have classified into the observers since such players have already cleared the sub scenario C<b>6</b> (on control, such a procedure is optional, the procedure that no clear flag is given to the players who have classified into the observers or the procedure that the clear flag is given to all, but the clear flag is not finally given to the player who has already cleared the sub scenario C<b>6</b> since it means overwrite of the clear flag). At this time, distribution of an experience value due to the clearing of the sub scenario C<b>6</b> is equally done to all party players, and there is no difference between the challenger and the observer.
After giving the clear flag to the leader ad the sub leader that are the challengers, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> enters Step S<b>8</b> of the cooperation play processing program CTP, and the player information stored in the memory (not shown) in the game server <b>3</b> is updated for the players of the challengers, and the clear flag showing the clearing of the sub scenario C<b>6</b> by such players is written in the memory. By doing so, one-time execution of the sub scenario C<b>6</b> by the leader and the sub leader who were unified challengers means all persons comprising the unit have cleared the sub scenario C<b>6</b>. The player information of the player as the observer is not changed after update since the player is considered to have cleared the sub scenario C<b>6</b>.
Subsequently, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> enters Step S<b>9</b> and does the procedure of releasing the unification in the scenario proceeding unified in Step S<b>4</b>. This is done by deleting party member table PMT in connection with the party members that have been prepared in the scenario control memory <b>11</b>. With such a procedure, the unification of the leader and the sub leader who are the challengers is released and the limitation of the scenario proceeding is released for each player who has been the challenger, so that the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> controls each player can execute the optional sub scenario Cx and the partial scenarios D through F which have not yet been executed. No procedure is done for the player who has been “the observer” since no limitation on execution of the scenario is originally given to such a person.
Receiving this, the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> returns the scenario proceeding of each player who was the party member to a normal scenario proceeding. By doing so, each player who was the party member can take actions alone freely in the virtual space in the game server <b>3</b> and execute the optional partial scenarios C through F by operating his (her) own operation character through each game terminal <b>1</b>.
In the above-mentioned embodiment, the leader and sub leader comprising the challengers are determined among the players comprising the party members upon deliberation, but the scenario proceeding controller <b>9</b> of the game server <b>3</b> can automatically determine the leader and the sub leader by referring to the state of clearing of the sub scenario of each player through the player information in the memory (not shown) with no deliberation between the players.
Besides, the partial scenario to be done through the party formed by two or more players in cooperation with these players is not always the partial scenario having the sub scenarios, but the cooperation play may be done when executing the partial scenario on which no sub scenario is set.
Contents6
6 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6
Every citation, both waysCites: the store holds 42 of 43
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2003109297A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2004106456A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2004152520A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2005119050A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2005197187A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2006003824A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2006068905A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2006100020A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2006116186A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2006223602A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2007087798A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2007254741A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2008153596A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009098940A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009325712A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| JP2010082310A | Cites | Japan | Applicant |
| US2011190063A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US2012015748A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6336861B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6500070B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6669562B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6676521B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US7731591B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US8272953B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20030109297A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20040106456A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20040152520A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20050119050A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20050197187A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20060003824A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20060068905A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20060100020A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20060116186A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20060223602A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20070087798A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20070254741A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20080153596A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20090098940A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20090325712A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20110190063A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US20120015748A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| JP2010082310 | Cites | Japan | Applicant |
| Dengeki PSP, Japan, Media Works Inc. Jun. 1, 2007, vol. 13 No. 20, p. 54-61. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Dengeki PlayStation, Japan, Media Works, Inc. Mar. 9, 2007, vol. 13 No. 11, p. 10-31. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Dengeki PSP, Japan, Media Works Inc. Jun. 1, 2007, vol. 13 No. 20, p. 54-61. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Dengeki PlayStation, Japan, Media Works, Inc. Mar. 9, 2007, vol. 13 No. 11, p. 10-31. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
16 members in 6 offices
Priority claims5
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010268903 | Japan | – | |
| 2010268903 | Japan | A | |
| 2010268903 | Japan | A | |
| 2010268903 | – | – | – |
| JP20100268903 | – | – | – |
Members16
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2012052957A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP2460573A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| TW201223604A | Taiwan Province of China | A | |
| JP2012115532A | Japan | A | |
| KR20120094545A | Republic of Korea | A | |
| CN102722632A | China | A | |
| EP2460573A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| JP5248579B2 | Japan | B2 | |
| US8968097B2This record | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2015111648A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| CN102722632B | China | B | |
| TWI541052B | Taiwan Province of China | B | |
| KR101744359B1 | Republic of Korea | B1 | |
| US9868064B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2018093190A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US10486071B2 | United States of America | B2 |
48 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 1 non-final rejection, 1 final rejection and 1 RCE.
- Non-final rejections
- 1
- Final rejections
- 1
- RCEs
- 1
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large EntityM1552 | M1552 | |
| Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large EntityM1551 | M1551 | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/ | PGM/ | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowedPTAC | PTAC | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR | WPIR | |
| Dispatch to FDCD1935 | D1935 | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS | PILS | |
| Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084 | N084 | |
| Issue Fee Payment ReceivedIFEE | IFEE | |
| Filing Receipt - CorrectedFLRCPT.C | FLRCPT.C | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=. | MN/=. | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=. | N/=. | |
| Reasons for AllowanceEX.R | EX.R | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129AbandonedABN9 | ABN9 | |
| Request for Continued Examination (RCE)RCEX | RCEX | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Workflow - Request for RCE - BeginBRCE | BRCE | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR | MCTFR | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR | CTFR | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Mail Notice of Informal or Non-Responsive AmendmentNINA | NINA | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Informal or Non-Responsive Amendment after Examiner ActionA.I. | A.I. | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Electronic Information Disclosure StatementEIDS. | EIDS. | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Request for Foreign Priority (Priority Papers May Be Included)RQPR | RQPR | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| PG-Pub Issue NotificationPG-ISSUE | PG-ISSUE | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Electronic Information Disclosure StatementEIDS. | EIDS. | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Sent to Classification ContractorPGPC | PGPC | |
| Filing ReceiptFLRCPT.O | FLRCPT.O | |
| Cleared by OIPE CSRL194 | L194 | |
| Request from applicant for the USPTO to retrieve the Priority DocumentPDREQUST | PDREQUST | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN | SCAN | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
5 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance fee paymentMAFP | MAFP | |
| Maintenance fee paymentMAFP | MAFP | |
| Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF | STCF | |
| Fee payment procedurePAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYFEPP | FEPP | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 08968097
- Publication, DOCDB
- 8968097
- Publication, EPODOC
- US8968097
- Application
- 13289572
- Application, DOCDB
- 201113289572
- Application, EPODOC
- US201113289572
Titles
- English
- Game server and scenario control program
Patent term adjustment
- A delay
- +114 daysthe office missed an examination deadline
- Applicant delay
- −161 days
- Net adjustment
- 0 days
Classification
- CPC, 15
- A63F13/12
- A63F13/497
- A63F13/795
- A63F13/00
- A63F13/35
- A63F13/10
- A63F2300/5533
- A63F13/822
- A63F2300/5566
- A63F13/847
- A63F2300/407
- A63F2300/634
- A63F2300/807
- A63F13/47
- A63F13/825
- IPC, 9
- A63F9 00
- A63F13 33
- A63F13 30
- A63F13 35
- A63F13 40
- A63F13 45
- A63F13 79
- A63F13 822
- A63F13 847
- USPC, 1
- 463042000