Business rating placement heuristic

RELATED APPLICATIONS

p-0002This application is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/948,425, filed Sep. 23, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,516,086 on Apr. 7, 2009, titled “BUSINESS RATING PLACEMENT HEURISTIC”, which is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/800,887, filed Mar. 15, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,822,661 titled “INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING A POSITION ADJUSTMENT FACTOR”, and also a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/801,156, filed Mar. 15, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,974,878 titled “INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING A POSITION ADJUSTMENT FACTOR”; and is also a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/800,444, filed Mar. 15, 2004, titled “INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AND METHOD UTILIZING A POSITION ADJUSTMENT FACTOR”, all of which are Continuations-In-Part of application Ser. No. 10/680,952, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,050,990, filed Oct. 8, 2003, titled “INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM”, and which further claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/505,597, filed Sep. 24, 2003, titled “INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM”, the entire teachings of these applications being incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

p-0003The invention is a system and method for distributing information (collectively “information system” or simply the “system”).

h-0003I. Focused Distribution of Information

p-0004The information system can make it easier and more efficient for potential customers to identify potentially desirable providers of goods and/or services (collectively “providers”), while at the same time, making it easier for providers to more effectively “focus” advertising to potentially interested customers.

p-0005The yellow pages and other traditional “hard copy” telephone directories (collectively “phone books”) have over the years provided individuals and organizations (collectively “customers”) with the ability to obtain information about potential providers of goods and services. Phone books typically organize provider listings (“listings”) into a variety of different categories based on the types of the goods, services or other offerings (collectively “products”) being offered. For example, an Italian restaurant may be listed under the category of “restaurants.” Although many providers are listed in the phone book without any fees being charged by the provider of the phone book, many providers choose to pay advertisement fees in order to obtain larger listings or better placement for their listings. In addition to organizing listings by category, traditional phone books also provide a geographic focus for customers using the phone book. For example, a phone book for the city of Chicago will not include restaurants located in New York City unless the restaurants are affiliated with national chains that also have operations in Chicago. Although phone books do provide customers and providers with a useful way to reach out to each other, phone books suffer from various flaws and limitations that are intrinsic to “hard copy” documents.

p-0006Listings in phone books are inherently static. Advertisers in the phone book cannot update their listings once the phone book is published. Thus, the information provided in a phone book listing or advertisement may include out of date information relating to the location of the business, the operating hours, phone numbers, sales and other time-sensitive events, product offerings, and other potentially important information relating to the provider. Moreover, phone books are not, and cannot be, specifically tailored to the specific needs of a specific customer at a desired time and place. One day, a particular customer may be exclusively interested in looking for restaurants within a particular suburb. On another day, that same person may be solely interested in looking for nightclubs located in a broader metropolitan area. A printed phone book cannot adapt itself to the ever changing specific goals of the customer, or to the specific intentions of the supplier in the context of customers with such goals. The lack of flexibility provided by conventional phone books is particularly evident in evaluating the geographical and categorical goals of the potential customer.

p-0007The functionality of geographical distinctions is limited in phone books. The ability of phone books to incorporate the geographical desires of customers is limited to a single binary variable. Listings are either included in a particular phone book or they are excluded. Phone books do not typically allow the customer to perform a more narrow inquiry limited to a mere subset of the geographical regions covered by the phone book. For example, a phone book for a particular metropolitan area does not typically allow the customer to limit their view to listings within a geographical area that is selected by the customer. Moreover, depending on the location of the particular customer, there may be geographical regions just outside the geographical coverage of the phone book that are closer to the particular customer than the listings provided in the phone book even though the customer is located within the geographical region covered by the phone book. It would be desirable to provide customers with more flexible and sophisticated geographic functionality to provide for a more focused and efficient exchange of information between providers and customers. A hierarchy of geographical distinctions would provide customers with a powerful tool for obtaining the information that they desire.

p-0008The functionality of organizing listings into various subject matter categories is also significantly limited in a traditional printed phone book. Phone books provide listings sequentially because the listings are physically printed on paper. Phone books cannot incorporate a hierarchy of categories without introducing a prohibitive quantity of redundancy. For example, a phone book does not typically include many overlapping categories of different scopes and foci. For example, most phone books do not differentiate between categories organized in a hierarchical fashion. For example, the categories of “retail stores,” “consumer electronics,” “digital optical equipment,” “digital cameras,” and “digital video cameras” are distinct from each other, but at the same time, are interrelated as to subject matter. For example, digital video cameras are a type of digital camera, and digital cameras are a type of digital optical equipment. In the context of a phone book, category “hierarchies” are typically limited to a hierarchical “depth” of only one level. True hierarchies of categories are not an option, because the paper medium of a phone book does not provide the dynamic ability to “drill down” or “drill up” a hierarchy. Thus, a customer looking for listings of digital video cameras may have to settle for consumer electronics listings that include providers having nothing to do with digital video cameras. It would be desirable to provide customers with the ability to flexibly navigate categories from within an integrated hierarchy of categories that is more than one level deep. It may also be desirable to provide a fully “normalized” hierarchy of categories and geographical regions so that potential options within a particular area of interest are made accessible to customers in a prioritized manner in accordance with the selections made by customers. The phrase “fully normalized” refers to the ability of a system to potentially distinguish between any two attributes that are differentiated by only a single material distinction. In a normalized hierarchy, differences between data elements are treated differently to the extent of the differences, and similar data elements are treated similarly to the extent of the similarities. A “normalized hierarchy” of relevant information would provide for a more focused and efficient exchange of information between providers and customers. By limiting the ability of customers to “zero in” and focus on the listings that are of interest, traditional phone books force customers to wade through information that is not of interest to the information that they are currently looking for.

p-0009Limitations of physical phone books also impede the desires and goals of advertisers. Just as customers may want to focus on a particular geographical region or a particular category, providers may also desire to limit or “focus” their listings and other advertisements. For example, a small barbershop may not be interested in trying to bring in customers more than a few miles away from the location of the barbershop. Moreover, the barbershop may not provide the range of hair care and other appearance-related services of a beauty salon, spa, or similar business. In many instances, the provider is either forced to pay for reaching an audience that the provider is not truly interested in pursuing, or the provider must forego pursuing an audience that the provider is interested in pursuing. If the provider chooses not to pay for a listing, both the provider and the publisher of the phone book are negatively impacted by the inherent limitations of the phone book.

p-0010Phone books lack a direct feedback mechanism to inform phone book publishers and their advertisers of the usage of the various categories or advertisements in the phone book. The number of people who actually view a particular listing or ad provided in the phone book can only be estimated. Similarly, the percentage of people who see a particular listing and respond to it can only be estimated. The traditional “hard copy” phone book does not include a mechanism for transmitting information back to phone book publishers and their advertisers. The inability to directly measure the effectiveness and utility of listings impedes advertisers in transmitting their message in a phone book, and limits the ability of publishers to facilitate such communications. The inability to directly measure effectiveness results in inefficiencies that are detrimental to publishers, advertisers, and customers. In many circumstances, it would be desirable for an information distribution system to definitively track the access and usage of advertisement information. If such a system were established, it would facilitate the implementation of a pricing mechanism based on one or more objective pricing formulas, including for example, charging advertisers on a “per-hit” or per transaction basis or for automatic placement within a well-defined geographic region in accordance with a robust multi-hierarchical category system.

p-0011The implementation of alternative delivery and pricing mechanisms that are precluded by limitations intrinsic to paper phone books prevent phone book publishers from more effectively tailoring listings for the mutual benefit of customers, providers, and publishers alike. For example, providing any form of preferential placement to providers who pay for placement based on objective criteria that help demonstrate effectiveness can be an effective way to encourage advertising spending by providers.

p-0012Some of the present-day limitations of paper-bound phone books are addressed by various information technology tools such as search engines and other mechanisms that utilize the World Wide Web, or similar networks (collectively “search engines”). For example, the ability to monitor Internet traffic (e.g. a “hits” from a link to a website), and the ability to frequently update information on a website can be accomplished by using various tools found in the existing art.

p-0013Unfortunately, in solving certain problems, search engines in the existing art actually exacerbate many existing limitations of paper-bound phone books while also creating entirely new problems. The marvels of information technology can literally provide a customer with information from a voluminous number of sources from across the globe. This makes tools such as search engines particularly powerful and useful for tracking down information that is hard to obtain, pertains to “niche” topics, or is otherwise related to obscure subjects. For example, search engines may be excellent tools to learn about collecting rare books, restoring 17^thcentury art, or finding a person who is fluent in the Klingon language (a language originating from a popular science fiction show that began in the 1960's). Internet search technologies can also “succeed” in obtaining information about more mundane or common matters.

p-0014The use of search engines, however, in more common contexts all too often results in “information overflow” for the user, as well as the providing of so-called “false positives.” Unlike paper-bound phone books, search engines are not limited to organizations desiring to provide potential customers with particular goods and services. Search engines are not designed to easily provide users with the ability to identify nearby businesses involved in a particular category or sub-category of goods or services. For example, a search term of “restaurant” will return listings relating to restaurant sites, restaurant reviews, and a voluminous number of “restaurant” references having nothing to do with actual restaurants that are open for business and seeking customers. For example, screenplays, poems, novels, short stories, song lyrics, and variety of other literary mediums may include the word “restaurant” because restaurants are a common part of everyday life, and often make good context for literary works. Search engines do not provide an efficient mechanism for potential customers to obtain information from providers interested in providing a particular good or service to the customer. Search engine users are effectively prevented from finding the proverbial “needle” they are looking for due to a “haystack” of irrelevant data between the user, and the result they are looking for.

p-0015A. Geography Attributes

p-0016Although it is true that search terms relating to geographical regions can be submitted to search engines, that functionality is not the same thing as retrieving information that is specifically organized and stored into various hierarchies of geography, categories, and potentially other relevant attributes. A search consisting of “New York” and “barbershops” will still result in a voluminous number of listings having nothing to with a barbershop open for business in New York City. This limitation is intrinsic to the nature of the Internet and the types of searches performed by conventional search engines.

p-0017B. Category Attributes

p-0018Nor do search engines provide guidance to both advertisers and customers through a normalized hierarchical category structure, designed to minimize the likelihood of returning less than the desired universe of goods and services. Individuals, depending on their cultural and geographic background, may use non-similar nomenclature for the same desired good or service. For example, it is possible to use the word “lounge”, “club”, “tavern” or “pub”, as synonyms for a “bar.” In many contexts, it would be desirable for an information system to normalize user terminology into the hierarchical category structure to facilitate the true desires of the user.

p-0019Unlike phone books that are created and organized by a publisher, the Internet is not managed by any single organization. The unmanaged evolution and growth of the Internet has resulted in such a large volume of ever increasing information that precludes attempts to organize every potential search listing into a hierarchy of categories and geographical areas. It would be desirable for an online system to provide customers with the ability to locate desired goods and services using distinguishable attributes such as geographic or category based limitations, and permitting extremely refined focus in each of these areas simultaneously depending on the needs and desires of the customer.

p-0020C. Search Term Limitations

p-0021Search engines also hamper the ability of providers to better focus their marketing and advertising efforts to potential customers. For example, some search engines prioritize listings within a search engine result the basis of a per-hit advertising fee paid for by the advertiser in accordance with a “key” term, which is mapped to the search term used by a searcher. Advertisers in such systems cannot target their audience based on geography or the category of the good or service, and the use of “key” terms based solely on word matching greatly reduces the total universe of potentially relevant hits to the detriment of all involved. It would be desirable to provide advertisers with such capabilities that do not suffer from the limitations of a “key” term search approach.

p-0022D. Reviews and Ratings

p-0023Many web sites, including search engine sites, provide users with the ability to provide reviews and/or ratings of businesses, products, web sites, etc. Some web sites, including search engine sites, even provide users with the ability to sort search results based on these ratings and/or reviews. However, no site has used these ratings and/or reviews in concert with geographic attributes, category attributes, and/or the per-hit fee paid in order to determine advertiser positioning in a display of search results. A system that made such use of ratings and/or reviews would provide users with the benefit of having the most attractive and/or interesting advertisers favorably positioned in a display of search results.

p-0024E. Group-Based Processing

p-0025Under the existing search engine art, all providers compete against each other, regardless of differences in geographic scope or the scope of the goods and services. In bid-based approaches, local providers are bidding against national providers. Providers within a specialized sub-category such as high speed digital video cameras are bidding against more general providers of photography equipment or even consumer electronics retailers. Thus, it would typically be desirable to facilitate the organization of various provider listings into “groups” based on geography, category, fee type (such as fixed fee approaches or bid-based approaches), and other distinctions. One kind of fixed fee approach is known as a per-hit fee, discussed further in Section II below, in which the advertiser pays an agreed on fee every time the advertiser's listing is included in a display of search results. It may sometimes be desirable to group advertisers according to whether they have agreed to pay a per-hit fee and/or according to the amount of the per-hit fee that the advertiser has agreed to pay. In general it may also be desirable for administrators to create different administrative rules for different groups. For example, it might be desirable for local advertisers to compete in different auctions or to have a different minimum bid requirement and even a different minimum bid increment requirement, than a national advertiser.

p-0026Both online search tools and the more traditional printed phone books lack useful mechanisms to enhance the ability to potential customers to find the information they are looking for, and the ability of providers to focus their marketing and advertising efforts to those potential customers most interested in their goods and services. In many respects, the advantages of online search engines affirmatively teach away from the functionality of conventional printed phone books and the functionality of conventional paper-bound phone books affirmatively teach away from the functionality of search engines. Although there are some online phone books in the existing prior art, up until now they have typically mimicked their traditional counterparts with only a few basic advantages such as the providing of a map or driving directions to the provider. The known prior art does not disclose, much less affirmatively suggest, the existence of a system or method that can surpass the functionality of both traditional printed phone books and online search tools with respect to the focusing of the search.

h-0004II. Relationship-Based Processing Rules

p-0027The information system can facilitate the ability of providers of goods and/or services (collectively “providers” or “advertisers”) and distributors of information relating to the goods and/or services of providers (collectively “distributors” or “administrators”) to develop meaningful and mutually beneficial relationships.

p-0028Phone books, search engines, and other information distribution mechanisms prioritize and sort information listings in a variety of different ways using a variety of different placement practices. For example, some search tools may display provider listings in accordance with a per-hit fee associated with the particular listing, as mentioned above. The greater the per-hit fee, the closer to the front of the line the particular listing is displayed. Other search tools may prioritize listings based on a relevance metric related to the particular search criteria submitted by a user, a date/time stamp associated with the listing, or some other attribute related to the listing.

p-0029Such approaches emphasize attributes relating the particular listing to the exclusion of other attributes, such as attributes relating to the relationship between the provider and the distributor. Listing-based approaches fail to give proper weight to loyalty and to business relationships “as a whole.” For example, listings based on per-hit fees alone ignore the relevance of other attributes that are important to both the user and the advertiser such as category attributes, geographic attributes, and ratings information. It would also be desirable for publishers or administrators of online tools to create various administrative rules that would facilitate mutually rewarding approaches by which advertisers are appropriately charged for advertising online.

p-0030For example, in a system involving advertisers competing for favorable placement on the basis of their per-hit bid amount (“bid-based approaches”), it might be desirable to take into account the overall relationship between the administrator and the advertiser. For example, if a particular advertiser has purchased numerous search listings, it might be desirable to adjust or enhance the impact of the bid amount by the particular advertiser for a particular search term. Adjustments can also be made on seniority to reward long-term sustained relationships.

p-0031The existing art does not appear to teach or even merely suggest the influence of relationship-based attributes in the treatment of listing-based attribute. Moreover, the growing emphasis on listing-based attributes affirmatively teaches away from relationship-based attributes being used as position adjustment factors.

h-0005III. Enhanced Display Formats

p-0032The information system can make it easier for providers of goods and/or services distinguish the ways in which relevant information is organized and displayed to potentially interested customers.

p-0033Existing information distribution mechanisms typically fail to take full advantage of the different ways in which different listings can be differentiated from one another. For example, the cost of conventional phone book listings and other advertisements are typically determined by the location of the listing within the phone book, and the size of the listing in terms of the space taken up by the listing. The cost of listings are not typically differentiated with respect to font types, font sizes, color, the inclusion of graphics, the inclusion of animation, the inclusion of sound, the number of characters, the number or words, the number of sentences, potential opportunities of interactivity, the organizational structure or format of the information, and various other potentially useful display characteristics (collectively “enhanced display formats”).

p-0034Listings distributed in an online format provide even greater opportunities for differentiating the display formats of various listings. However, the search engines in the existing art apparently fail to encourage the differentiation of listings through the use of different enhanced display format characteristics. Even highly market driven search engines that are premised upon competitive bidding between various providers currently fail to factor the use of enhanced display formats into the fees charged to advertisers and other providers. This failure results in a lack of incentive on the part of search engines to offer various enhanced display format options to providers and other advertisers.

p-0035The existing art does not appear to teach or even merely suggest the offering of various enhanced display format options in exchange for various fees to be paid by the provider. Moreover, recent developments and trends in the existing art teach away from listing differentiation on the basis of enhanced display formats because of the growing popularity of the “auction” paradigm for search engines where advertisers compete with each other through the per-transaction fees they agree to pay for better placement. The increasing focus on the placement of listings corresponds to a de-emphasis with respect to the contents of the various listings. The use of competitive auctions for better listing placement affirmatively exaggerates a trend of commoditization with respect to the display formats of the various listings.

p-0036For example, advertisers may desire that a portion of the bid amount go to purchasing a larger listing, flashy sound or animation effects, larger font, or some other enhancing display-related attribute. Limiting the impact of a bid amounts to the order of listings thus fails to accommodate the desires of advertisers.

p-0037The existing art does not appear to teach or even merely suggest the influence of customizing or enhancing the display of listings. Moreover, the growing emphasis on the location and placement of listings affirmatively teaches away from allowing advertisers to pay monies not related to “moving up” the ranking of listings.

h-0006IV. Tiered Listings

p-0038The information system can organizes information listings into tiers.

p-0039Existing information distribution mechanisms such as Internet search engines and traditional “hard copy” distribution mechanisms implement a variety of different placement practices. For example, some search tools may display provider listings in accordance with a per-hit fee associated with the particular listing. The greater the per-hit fee, the closer to the front of the line the particular listing is displayed. Other search tools may prioritize listings based on a relevance metric related to the particular search criteria submitted by a user, a date/time stamp associated with the listing, or some other attribute related to the listing.

p-0040Regardless of the placement/positioning rules implemented by such systems, “competition” between listings is not necessarily enhanced by such rules. For example, in the context of system that orders listings in accordance with a per-hit fee associated with each listing (a “strict bid order environment”), there may be an incentive for the top two or three competitors to increase their bids so as to obtain the number one position (“pole position”) within a particular response. However, not all of the advertisers are necessarily in a position to try and compete for the pole position. Moreover, many advertisers may genuinely not be interested in attempted to out bid all other advertisers. Under a strict bid order environment, there is often little of no incentive for a 7^thranked bidder to raise their bid to achieve the 6^thspot. The incremental differences between finishing for example 3^rdinstead of 4^th, 6^thinstead of 7^th, 9^thinstead of 10^th, etc. are often not particularly significant. Thus, a strict bid order environment may result in maximizing the competitive bidding for the pole position, while failing to maximize the aggregate competitive bidding for the listings within a response as a whole.

p-0041It would be desirable for competitive listing approaches to incorporate the concept of tiers. Within a tier, listings can be ordered in a variety of different ways instead of being strictly ordered in accordance with some particular metric, such as a per-hit fee amount. For example, in a per-hit fee environment, listings could be organized into tiers of three listings each on the basis of the per-hit fee associated with each of the listings. For example, within each tier, listings could be ordered in a purely random fashion. This would provide intense competition for the 3^rd, 6^th, 9^th, etc. spots. For example, a listing finishing 7^thin a competitive bid would be listed 7^thone third of the time, 8^thone third of the time, and 9^thone third of the time. In contrast, a listing finishing 6^thin a competitive bid would be listed 4^thone third of the time, 5^thone third of the time, and 6^thone third of the time. While only one or two bidders may fancy themselves to be potential winners of the “pole position,” there may be a substantial number of bidders interested in a 3^rdplace ranking over a 4^thplace a ranking, a 6^thplace ranking over a 7^thplace ranking, etc.

p-0042The prior art does not appear to suggest much less teach such a tier-based approach because thoughts of competition focus on the “pole position” competition to the exclusion of the aggregate competition of the particular response. From the perspective of one of average skill in the art, it is nonsensical to attempt to increase aggregate competition by implementing practices that may decrease the highest bids within the auction, i.e. the incentive to win the “pole position.”

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

p-0043The invention is a system and method for distributing information (collectively “information system” or simply the “system”).

h-0008I. Focused Distribution of Information

p-0044The information system can make it easier and more efficient for potential customers to identify potentially desirable providers of goods and services (collectively “providers”) with respect to particular transactions, while at the same time, making it easier for providers to more effectively “focus” advertising to potential customers.

p-0045A. Geography Attributes

p-0046In certain disclosed embodiments, information requests and responses distinguish between various geography attributes that are associated with some or all of the various listings. Hierarchies of geographical regions can be stored and processed by the system.

p-0047B. Category Attributes

p-0048In some embodiments, information requests and responses distinguish between various category attributes that are associated with some or all of the various listings. Hierarchies of categories can be stored and processed by the system. In certain preferred embodiments the category hierarchy is fully “normalized,” allowing the system to make finely tuned distinctions based on subtle attribute differences. The use of predefined data hierarchies can provide the best possible universe of results and minimizing the loss of relevant results based merely on differences in nomenclature. Mechanisms may be provided to relate like “terms” so that the correct category is easily located within the overall structure when a non-normalized term is used.

p-0049C. Fee Types

p-0050In some embodiments, there is more than one type of fee that can be associated with the listings included in a response to an information request. For example, a response may include some listings paid for on a fixed fee basis, while also including listings paid for on a fixed or variable per-hit basis. Hierarchies of fee types can be stored and processed by the system.

p-0051D. Reviews and Ratings

p-0052In some embodiments, user reviews and/or ratings for advertisers' businesses, products, and/or web sites, etc. are collected. For example, ratings could include an aggregate rating based on a user's general rating for a business, product, and/or web site, or ratings could include an aggregate rating based on a combination of rating attributes such as price, quality of customer support, timeliness of delivery, or quality of product. As discussed below, such rating attributes may also be used individually in certain embodiments. These reviews and/or ratings, including rating attributes may be stored by the system, and used in the formulation of a response to a search request either alone or in combination with other attributes such as category and/or geography attributes.

p-0053E. Groups

p-0054In many embodiments of the present invention, a single response can include more than one group of listings. Listing groups can be dynamically defined by the interactions between listing attributes set forth by the provider, the request attributes set forth by the customer, and/or the administrative rules implemented by the administrator for the system. Each group in a response can have its own methodology for ordering the listings within the group. The listings need not be displayed in a manner that is determined in a sort by group. For example, three listings prioritized on the basis of bid amounts can be followed by two listings prioritized on a fixed fee basis, with those two fixed fee listings then being followed by the next three listings prioritized on the basis of bid amounts.

h-0009II. Relationship-Based Processing Rules

p-0055Some embodiments of the information system can allow the processing rules of the system to be influenced by relationship-based as well as listing-based attributes. A position adjustment factor can be used by the system to allow attributes relating to the relationship between a provider and a distributor (relationship-based attributes) to influence what would otherwise be a listing-based process of prioritizing, placing, and/or displacing information listings.

p-0056For example, in certain embodiments of the information system that prioritize listing placements based in part on bid amounts associated with the various listings, bid amounts can be merely one factor used to calculate the priority metric for prioritizing listing placements (“bid-influenced approaches”). Position modifiers based on loyalty, other relationship attributes and/or fixed fees can cause a particular listing to possess a higher priority metric even though other listings are associated with a larger per-hit or “click through” fee.

p-0057Various position adjustment factors can be used to influence the priority metric used to prioritize the placements of listings within a particular group. In some embodiments position adjustment factors influencing the priority metric may include some or all of the following: the amount of a per-hit fee, geography attributes, category attributes, and review and/or rating information.

p-0058In some embodiments, the relationship between users and advertisers can also be associated with a position adjustment factor that impacts the priority metrics associated with various listings. For example, the popularity of a particular listing can enhance the priority metric for that particular listing so that the priority metric for that particularly listing surpasses the priority metrics associated with listings involving higher per-hit fees. In order to facilitate the ability of users to better “focus” their efforts on using the system, the system can also provide additional flexibility with respect to the submission of requests. For example, a user request can be augmented in accordance with the particular user's history with the system, a user profile, or other forms of “intelligence” utilized by the system.

h-0010III. Enhanced Display Formats

p-0059The information system can charge providers of goods and services a fee associated with enhancing the display characteristics of a particular listing. In an auction embodiment of the system, the enhanced display format fee charged with respect to a particular listing can be part of a per-transaction fee that is paid by the provider.

p-0060For example, if part of the bid amount is attributable to a display fee for non-priority related factors such as listing length, font size, colors, graphics, or other factors, then the priority metric no longer correlates to the per-hit fee amount.

h-0011IV. Tiered Listings

p-0061The information system can use tier-based processing to encourage “competition” between listings throughout the continuum of listings, and not just at the very top echelon of listings.

p-0062Whatever the basis for “competition” between listings (e.g. per-hit fees, relevancy metric, etc.), the impact of the competition in a system utilizing tiers-based processing is to place listings within various tiers. The size of the tiers can vary widely from embodiment to embodiment. The ordering of the listings within their identified tiers is performed in accordance with the predefined rules of the system. In some embodiments, ordering listings within the tiers is a purely random function. In other embodiments, the probability can be modified or weighted by some other metric, such as the metric used to organize the listings into tiers in the first place, or some other metric.

p-0063A tiered-based approach can incorporate a minimum entry value to qualify for a particular tier. For example, in a competition based on a per-hit fee for tiers of three listings each, entry into the first tier would require that a particular listing out compete all but the top two listings. In certain instances, the 3^rdranked listing could be significantly behind the first two listings. Thus, it can be desirable to place additional requirements such as minimum per-hit fee amounts (a “minimum bid amount”) to be eligible to achieve membership in a particular tier.

p-0064In some bid-influenced approaches, different groups will be associated with different minimum bid values necessary to join the particular group. Different groups may also be associated with different minimum bid increments for increasing those bid amounts.

h-0012V. Other Potential Features

p-0065The system can be implemented in such a way as to maximize the ability of the system to distinguish between different types of user and advertiser activities. Different user activities can result in different advertising fees being charged to the advertiser. Dissimilar user activities can be classified as different types of “hits” for the purpose of charging advertisers. Dissimilar types of “hits” can involve different “per hit” fees. As one example within the scope of the present invention, the fact that a particular listing appears within a result can trigger a particular charge to the advertiser. As another example, invoking of the web site through the listing can result in a different charge. In yet a further example, the sending of an e-mail to the advertiser through the system can result in a charge that is distinct from the previous two charges. In some embodiments of the system, the per-hit fee associated with a particular listing can be increased or decreased in accordance with the popularity of the listing. For example, in a step function approach, the system can be configured so that after 500 hits during a particular period of time, the per-hit fee associated with the particular listing is increased or decreased in accordance with some value, ratio, or factor. At the same time that the per-hit fee is adjusted, however, it does not necessarily mean that its location within the listing is altered.

p-0066The present invention will be more fully understood upon reading the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

p-0067<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of an information distribution system, including the components used to support the performance of the system, the types of information processed by the system, and some of the ways in which users and advertisers interact with the system.

p-0068<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of the administrative aspects of an information distribution system, including the components used by the administrator to support the performance of the system, the types of information processed by administrators of the system, and some of the ways in which administrator interacts with the system.

p-0069<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a category hierarchy that is three-levels deep.

p-0070<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>b </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating a specific example of the types of categories that can be incorporated into the system.

p-0071<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>a </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a geography hierarchy that is three levels deep.

p-0072<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>b </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating a geography hierarchy that includes national, regional/state, and local levels.

p-0073<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>c </i>is a partial hierarchy diagram illustrating various service areas that can be associated with a national level geographic region.

p-0074<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>d </i>is a partial hierarchy diagram illustrating various service areas that can be associated with a regional/state geographic region.

p-0075<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>e </i>is a partial hierarchy diagram illustrating various service areas that can be associated with a local geographic region.

p-0076<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a fee type hierarchy (or simply “fee hierarchy”).

p-0077<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>a </i>is a relationship diagram illustrating one example of how attributes associated with a group hierarchy are a function of attributes associated with category, geography, and fee hierarchies.

p-0078<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>b </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a group hierarchy.

p-0079<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>c </i>is an input/output diagram illustrating an example of request attributes, listing attributes, and administrative rules being used to define the groups to be included in the response.

p-0080<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>d </i>is a process flow diagram illustrating the submission of a request to a database structure, and inclusion of various listings in the response.

p-0081<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>a </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes a request subsystem and a response subsystem.

p-0082<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>b </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes a request subsystem, a result subsystem, and a response subsystem.

p-0083<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>c </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes a request subsystem, a result subsystem, a response subsystem, and an administrative subsystem.

p-0084<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref><i>a </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes a user subsystem and a sponsor subsystem.

p-0085<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref><i>b </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes a user subsystem, a sponsor subsystem, and an administrator subsystem.

p-0086<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref><i>a </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes an interface subsystem and a listing subsystem.

p-0087<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref><i>b </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system that includes an interface subsystem, a listing subsystem, and a focus subsystem.

p-0088<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> is a flow chart diagram illustrating one example of a process that can be performed by an administrator and the system.

p-0089<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 11</figref> is a flow chart diagram illustrating one example of a process that can be performed by an advertiser that submits a listing to the system.

p-0090<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref> is a flow chart diagram illustrating one example of a process that can be performed by a user of the system.

p-0091<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic after the submission of a request using city and zip code information.

p-0092<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 14</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of the response displayed on a continuation screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic after the submission of a request using city and zip code information and subsequent scrolling by a user for more local listings.

p-0093<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 15</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of the second screen of response displayed on a continuation screen in accordance with one embodiments of the placement heuristic after the submission of a request using city and zip code information and subsequent scrolling by a user for more national listings.

p-0094<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 16</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic after the submission of a request using state information.

p-0095<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 17</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic after the submission of a request using a business name or phone number.

p-0096<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 18</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic after the submission of a request that includes a blank value for a geography selection.

p-0097<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 19</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a bid-based approach where the listings are not displayed in order of bid amount.

p-0098<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 20</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page that includes various high-level categories.

p-0099<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 21</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page with a text string corresponding to a category selection entered by a user.

p-0100<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 22</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page with text strings corresponding to a category selection and a geography selection entered by a user.

p-0101<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 23</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page displaying more detailed sub-categories associated with the higher furniture category.

p-0102<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 24</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the sub-category of “room accessories.”

p-0103<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 25</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the antiques sub-category.

p-0104<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 25</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the antiques sub-category.

p-0105<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 26</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0106<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 26</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0107<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0108<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0109<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 28</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography, including two listings that have selected for the purposes of a “compare” function.

p-0110<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 28</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography, including two listings that have selected for the purposes of a “compare” function.

p-0111<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 29</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0112<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 29</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0113<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 30</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0114<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 30</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography.

p-0115<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 31</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the “living room” sub-category and a local geography.

p-0116<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 31</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the “living room” sub-category and a local geography.

p-0117<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 32</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of an advertiser contact information web page.

p-0118<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 33</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a bid entry web page for use by advertisers.

p-0119<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 34</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a monthly report web page accessible by advertisers.

p-0120<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 35</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a detailed view of a listing.

p-0121<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 35</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a detailed view of a listing.

p-0122<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 36</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a “compare” feature.

p-0123<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 37</figref><i>a </i>is a bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a “directions” feature.

p-0124<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 37</figref><i>b </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a “directions” feature.

p-0125<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 38</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of an “e-mail” feature.

p-0126<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 39</figref> depicts ratings tiers in an embodiment utilizing four tiers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

h-0015I. Overview

p-0127The invention is a system or method for distributing or disbursing information (collectively an “information system” or simply the “system”).

p-0128A. Focused Distribution of Information

p-0129The system can “focus” the information exchanged between potential buyers and sellers.

p-0130In contrast to paper-bound phone books or even online search engines, the system achieves highly focused exchanges between buyers and sellers by adapting itself more deeply to the specific goals of both buyers and sellers.

p-0131Buyers can use the system to identify potential sources for goods and services that are of particular interest to the potential buyer. Buyers can focus their access to listings of seller information by using the system to distinguish, order, and potentially exclude listings that are not associated with the desired attributes, such as a particular geography selection of the seller, a category selection relating to the goods and services offered by the seller, and/or reviews and/or ratings that the seller has received from other buyers. In contrast to conventional search engines and other online search tools, the use of such attributes is not limited to their inclusion as part of generally applicable search terms used to perform text-based searching. Instead, seller listings can be organized into hierarchies of geography, category, and other listing attributes in a highly normalized fashion to enhance the ability of a buyer make highly targeted or focused requests. The highly focused nature on the request allows the system to provide the potential buyer with a similarly focused response. The system can be configured to limit, order, or otherwise prioritize the information viewed by the buyer on the basis of the desired attributes identified by the buyer.

p-0132Sellers benefit from focusing their advertising to potential buyers who are in fact, interested in the goods, services, and other offerings that can be provided by the seller. The benefits to sellers allow an administrator of the system to charge more money for advertisements because the system is a more effective and uses a less scattered approach than other advertisement mechanisms.

p-0133Administrators configure the processing performed by the system by the creation and updating of administrative rules that determine which listings are selected by the system in response to a particular request, and how those listings are ordered and otherwise displayed in the response sent back the originator of the request. The administrative rules can determine the fees of certain advertisements, and such fees can include fixed-fees as well as various per-hit fees. The order in which listings are displayed in a particular response to a particular request can be influenced by numerous variables or combinations thereof, including a group affiliation, a geography attribute, a category attribute, a priority metric, a fixed-fee, a per-hit fee, a position adjustment factor, and an enhanced display fee. In many embodiments, the ordering and positioning of lists are not dependent on any single input variable. In such embodiments, no variable can be said to be independent of any other component and such independence would work against the flexibility and “focused” processing of the system.

p-0134In order to maximize the ability of the system to “focus” information requests and responses, advertiser “listings” can be organized into various hierarchies, such as a geography hierarchy, a category hierarchy, a fee-type hierarchy, or other attribute hierarchies. The requests for information submitted by users can then invoke the system to dynamically create one or more “groups” of listings using the various hierarchical distinctions, user selections, and/or information related to the user.

p-0135B. Relationship-Based Processing Rules

p-0136In some embodiments, the information system can incorporate relationship-based attributes into processing that would otherwise focus almost exclusively on listing-based attributes.

p-0137Such processing can facilitate beneficial and “holistic” relationships in the context of an information distribution system. With many different electronic and more traditional information search tools, the order and placement of the displayed information can mean the difference between a valuable opportunity to market the goods and services of a provider, and yet another message in a cacophony of messages that is never even read by the desired audience. The disclosed system can allow relationship-based attributes (e.g. attributes relating to the relationship between the provider and the information distributor) as well as listing-based attributes to influence the order, placement, and/or display characteristics (collectively “placement”) of a particular listing. Examples of position adjustment factors include aggregate advertising buys, seniority of the relationship, the number of listings associated with a particular advertiser, per-hit fees, or any other attribute that the distributor wishes to encourage

p-0138C. Enhanced Display Formats

p-0139In some embodiments of the information system, the system can incorporate the functionality of enhanced display formats. The information system can provide advertisers with the ability to distinguish their information records from the information records of other advertisers through the use of various enhanced display formats. Examples of enhanced display format characteristics include but are not limited to font size, font type, color, graphics, number of characters, number of words, number of sentences, sound, opportunities for interactivity, information organization, and potentially any other characteristic relating to the display of information. In an embodiment of the system where the advertiser is charged with a per transaction fee, that per transaction fee can include a monetary value relating to the enhanced display characteristics of the information record.

p-0140D. Tiered Listings

p-0141In some embodiments of the system, listings are first organized into tiers before the position of a particular listing within a particular tier is determined. The position of listings within a particular tier can be determined by different placement heuristics than used for other tiers within a single response to a single request.

p-0142In an embodiment of the system using a bid-influenced approach, it is possible that maximizing the competition for the “pole position” will not maximize the aggregate monies received by the information distributor running the system. A tiered-based approach can facilitate greater competition for locations throughout a response transmitted to a searcher, and not just at the very top of the response sent to the searcher.

p-0143Whatever the basis for “competition” between listings (e.g. per-hit fees, relevancy metric, etc.), the impact of the competition can be used to place listings within various tiers. The size of the tiers can vary widely from embodiment to embodiment. The ordering of the listings within the tiers is performed in accordance with the predefined rules of the system. In some embodiments, ordering listings within the tiers is a purely random function. In other embodiments, the probability can be modified or weighted by some other metric, such as the metric used to organize the listings into tiers in the first place, or some other metric.

h-0016II. Introduction of Elements

p-0144<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of an information distribution system <b>100</b>, including the components used to support the performance of the system <b>100</b>, the types of information processed by the system <b>100</b>, and some of the ways in which users <b>130</b> and advertisers <b>102</b> interact with the system <b>100</b>. Different embodiments of the system <b>100</b> can involve a wide variety of different components, information types, and interactions.

p-0145A. Advertiser

p-0146An advertiser <b>102</b> is any individual or organization that provides a listing <b>104</b> of information for inclusion in the system <b>100</b>. Advertisers <b>102</b> can interact with the system <b>100</b> through various individuals affiliated with the advertiser <b>102</b>, such as employees, contractors, or agents. In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, a third party is responsible for interfacing with the system <b>100</b> on behalf of the advertiser <b>102</b>. For example, a marketing agent could submit information for inclusion in the system <b>100</b> on behalf of the advertiser <b>102</b>. Such a submission could even be made without the knowledge of the advertiser <b>102</b> if the marketing agent is authorized to do so. Sources of advertiser information can include the local Telephone Company, data warehouse companies, activities of the provider's sales force and from the advertiser <b>102</b> directly. Advertisers <b>102</b> can also interact with the system <b>100</b> through various information technology mechanisms, such as software applications that are configured or adapted to interface with the system <b>100</b>. Such interfacing advertiser applications can interact with the system <b>100</b> in both an automated and manual manner, engaging in batch, real-time, schedule, and ad-hoc interactions.

p-0147In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the advertiser <b>102</b> can also be referred to as a seller, supplier, provider, or sponsor because advertisers <b>102</b> are typically sellers of various goods, services and/or other offerings (collectively “products”). However, advertisers <b>102</b> can also include individuals or organizations desiring to communicate with users to initiate future interactions where no good or service is involved. For example, churches, political parties, employers, community action groups, and other organizations seeking new members, volunteers, or employers could be “advertisers” <b>102</b> using the system <b>100</b>. An advertiser <b>102</b> can be any entity seeking to make its existence known to a variety of potential customers, users, or other potentially interested persons or organizations (collectively “users” <b>130</b>) through one or more listings <b>104</b> residing on the system <b>100</b>.

p-0148As indicated by the arrow originating from the advertiser <b>102</b> and pointing toward the listing <b>104</b>, advertisers <b>102</b> are responsible for providing information that comprises the content of the listings <b>104</b> to the system <b>100</b>. In some embodiments of the system, advertisers <b>102</b> may invoke the assistance of other entities, such as marketing consultants or the administrators of the system <b>100</b>, to physically create the listing. However, the advertiser <b>102</b> should ultimately be responsible for the contents of their listings <b>104</b>.

p-0149Although only one advertiser <b>102</b> is displayed in the Figure, it is anticipated that millions of listings <b>104</b> could be submitted by millions of advertisers <b>102</b> for inclusion in the system <b>100</b>. The capacity of the system <b>100</b> is only limited by the information technology architecture that supports the functionality of the system <b>100</b>.

p-01501. Listings and Listing Attributes

p-0151A listing <b>104</b> is the mechanism by which a user <b>130</b> learns about advertisers <b>102</b>. Even within a single embodiment of the system <b>100</b>, listings <b>104</b> can include a wide variety of different types of information in a wide variety of different formats. Listings <b>104</b> can include a wide variety of text, fonts, colors, graphics, animation, and sounds to communicate information about the advertiser <b>102</b> and the products of the advertiser <b>102</b>. Listings <b>104</b> could even incorporate different smell, touch, and taste sensations as those technologies are developed and made commercially available through computer networks. Below is one example of a listing <b>104</b> that can be incorporated into the system <b>100</b>:

h-0017Verizon Online DSL

p-0152<ul><li id="ul0001-0001" num="0151">UltraFast Internet Access. The Power is Yours.</li><li id="ul0001-0002" num="0152">(877) 270-2375 (toll-free) Res.</li><li id="ul0001-0003" num="0153">(888) 649-9500 (toll-free) Bus.</li></ul>

p-0153As indicated by the bracket extending from the listing <b>104</b>, each listing <b>104</b> can possesses certain characteristics or attributes which are referred to as listing attributes <b>106</b>. Listing attributes <b>106</b> can be set by the advertiser <b>102</b>, and they provide the advertiser <b>102</b> with the flexibility to target or focus their listing <b>104</b> towards users <b>130</b> with particular interests. Although listing attributes <b>106</b> can vary widely from listing <b>104</b> to listing <b>104</b> (even within the context of a single sequence of listings <b>104</b> within a single embodiment of the system <b>100</b>), in many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, there are similarities with respect to the particular types of information used by the system <b>100</b> as listing attributes <b>106</b> to describe listings <b>104</b>. In many embodiments, one or more of the listing attributes <b>106</b> can be associated with “blank” or “null” values.

p-0154a. Geography Attributes

p-0155As indicated by the bracket extending from the listing attributes <b>106</b> and encompassing a geography attribute <b>108</b>, one type of characteristic or listing attribute <b>106</b> that can be helpful to associate with various listings <b>104</b> is the characteristic of geography. One or more geography attributes <b>108</b> can be used by the system <b>100</b> to associate a particular listing <b>104</b> with a particular geographic region or a particular geographic scope. Geography attributes <b>108</b> can refer to a particular geographic region (such as New York City, the state of Illinois, the nation of Ireland, etc.), as well as a geographical “level” within a geographic hierarchy (such as a city, state, country, etc.). Any information relating to the location of the advertiser <b>102</b> can be a geography attribute <b>108</b>. Examples of geography attributes <b>108</b> can include, but are not limited to, a: street address, city, county, state, zip code, country, continent, longitude, latitude, elevation, phone number, fax number, terrain (such as mountainous, forest, jungle, etc.) or any other indicia of geographical information that could be of interest to a user <b>130</b> in focusing a request <b>132</b>. Different embodiments of the system <b>100</b> can involve different combinations of required and optional geography attributes <b>108</b>. For example, in one embodiment of the system <b>100</b>, each listing <b>104</b> could be required to be associated with some type of latitude and longitude values for distance determinations, point of interest data, and other mapping purposes. In other embodiments, the system <b>100</b> may refrain from requiring any particular type of geography attribute <b>108</b>.

p-0156Geography attributes <b>108</b> and their impact on the processing performed by the system <b>100</b>, are described in greater detail below.

p-0157b. Category Attributes

p-0158As indicated by the bracket extending from the listing attributes <b>106</b> and encompassing a category attribute <b>110</b>, one type of characteristic or listing attribute <b>106</b> that can be helpful to associate with various listings <b>104</b> is a category description of the subject matter offered by the advertisers <b>102</b>. Such a category description can be referred to as a category attribute <b>110</b>. One or more category attributes <b>110</b> can be used by the system <b>100</b> to associate a particular listing <b>104</b> with a good, service, or other type of offering (collectively “offering”). In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, category attributes <b>110</b> have a hierarchical relationship with each other. For example a digital video camera is a video camera, a camera, and a consumer electronics device all at the same time.

p-0159Category attributes <b>110</b> can include any attribute or information about the offering of an advertiser that would be potentially be of interest or use to the user <b>130</b> seeking to obtain information in a focused manner.

p-0160Category attributes <b>110</b> and their impact on the processing performed by the system <b>100</b>, are described in greater detail below.

p-0161c. Fee Type Attributes

p-0162As indicated by the bracket extending from the listing attributes <b>106</b> and encompassing a fee type attribute <b>112</b>, one type of characteristic or listing attribute <b>106</b> that can be helpful to associate with various listings is a “fee type” attribute <b>112</b>, or simply a “type” attribute <b>112</b>. The fee arrangement agreed to by the advertiser <b>102</b> determines the “type” of advertising product purchased by the advertiser <b>102</b>.

p-0163Fee type attributes <b>112</b> relate to financial characteristics of the listing <b>104</b> with respect to processing performed by the system <b>100</b>. For example, some listings <b>104</b> can involve charging the advertiser <b>102</b> each time a particular listing is presented in a response <b>144</b> to a request <b>132</b>. Such an arrangement can be referred to as a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> where a per-hit payment offered by the advertiser is deducted with each “hit” of the listing. A per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> can also involve a charge that is invoked only if the user <b>130</b> actually “clicks” on the listing to obtain more information about listing or activates a link on the listing to communicate with the advertiser <b>102</b> through the advertiser's <b>102</b> website, or some other means. The per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>, sometimes referred to as a “per-click” fee amount, can also be referred to as a bid amount because the financial value of the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> will be used by the system <b>100</b> (but never as the sole factor) in calculating a priority metric for the purposes of awarding better listing placement to advertisers <b>102</b> that are generally more valued by an administrator of the system <b>100</b>. The role of “administrator” is discussed in detail below.

p-0164Another example of a type attribute <b>112</b> is a fixed-fee amount <b>111</b>. In contrast to a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>, listings <b>104</b> of the fixed-fee type <b>111</b> do not result in advertisers <b>102</b> being charged on a per-hit basis. Instead, fixed-fee type listings <b>104</b> result in a set subscription charge for a period of time. Moreover, it is further possible to combine aspects of fee amounts <b>111</b> and <b>113</b> into a single listing <b>104</b>. For example, a fixed fee amount <b>111</b> may include an enhanced display fee <b>163</b> based on a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>.

p-0165Just as geography attributes <b>108</b> and category attributes <b>110</b> can be organized into a hierarchy of attributes, fee types <b>112</b> can also be organized into a hierarchy of types. That hierarchy is discussed in greater detail below.

p-0166The system <b>100</b> can be flexibly configured to support a wide range of different “hit” based functionality. The system <b>100</b> can support many different kinds of “hits.” In a first example, each time a listing <b>104</b> is included in a response <b>144</b> could be considered a “view hit.” In a second example, each time a listing <b>104</b> results in a sending of an e-mail through the system <b>100</b> could be considered an “e-mail hit.” In a third example, each time a user <b>130</b> invokes an automated calling feature could be referred to as a “call hit.” In a further example, each time a user <b>130</b> invokes a web link to an advertiser's <b>102</b> web site through a listing <b>104</b> could be considered a “web hit.” In another example, each time a user invokes an information request to a particular listing <b>104</b> could be considered an “information” hit. In a final illustrative example, each time a user <b>130</b> invokes a map relating to a particular listing <b>104</b> could be considered a “map hit.”

p-0167In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, phone number information can be hidden within a link identified as a “phone number.” The system <b>100</b> can be configured to reveal the phone number when a certain user <b>130</b> activity occurs, such as moving the mouse over the link. In such a configuration, the movement of the mouse over the link can be considered a “mouse hit.”

p-0168Thus, every potential interaction between the user <b>130</b> and the listing <b>104</b> can potentially constitute a particular type of “hit” that is distinguished by the system <b>100</b>. A single embodiment of the system <b>100</b> can include a wide variety of different kinds of hits. Each type of hit can result in a different per-hit fee <b>113</b>. For example, an advertiser <b>102</b> might be willing to pay more for a map hit than a view hit.

p-0169d. Review/Rating Attributes

p-0170As indicated by the bracket extending from the listing attributes <b>106</b> and encompassing a review/rating attribute <b>109</b>, one type of characteristic or listing attribute <b>106</b> that can be helpful to associate with various listings <b>104</b> is a compilation of user reviews and/or ratings of the subject matter offered by the advertisers <b>102</b>. Such a compilation of user reviews and/or ratings can be referred to as a review/rating attribute <b>109</b>. One or more review/rating attributes <b>109</b> can be used by the system <b>100</b> to associate a particular listing <b>104</b> with an offering or offerings.

p-0171Review/rating attributes <b>109</b> can include any attribute or information about reviews and/or ratings of an advertiser that would be potentially be of interest or use to the user <b>130</b> seeking to obtain information in a focused manner. In some embodiments, ratings for an advertiser's offering or offerings are collected on a numerical scale, e.g., from 1 to 5, 1 to 10, 1 to 100, etc. In some embodiments, reviews of an advertiser's offering or offerings may be collected. Review/rating attributes <b>109</b> in many embodiments includes a general, or aggregate, rating for a listing <b>104</b>. Such an aggregate rating may be based on overall ratings submitted by users <b>130</b>, or it may consist of some combination of other review/rating attributes <b>109</b>. Examples of other review/rating attributes <b>109</b> may include, but are by no means limited to price, quality of customer support, timeliness of delivery, quality of product, quality of customer service, product selection, etc. In general, review/rating attributes <b>109</b> can include a review and/or rating of any attribute that could be associated with a listing <b>104</b>, including attributes associated with web sites, products, and/or businesses.

p-01722. Advertiser Access Devices

p-0173An advertiser <b>102</b> interacts with the system <b>100</b> through one or more advertiser access devices <b>114</b>. In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, all of the advertiser's <b>102</b> interactions with the system <b>100</b> are performed without human intervention on the part of the administrator of the system <b>100</b>. In such embodiments, listings <b>104</b> and all listing attributes <b>106</b> are provided to the system <b>100</b> through the advertiser access device <b>114</b>. In other embodiments, certain activities, such as the updating of the listing <b>104</b> requires human intervention, while other activities such as increasing a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> or viewing a utilization report, is performed online. The system <b>100</b> can also be implemented in such a way as to require that all advertiser <b>102</b> interactions occur through human intervention with administrator personnel, but such limitations can prove to be unnecessarily restrictive.

p-0174A single advertiser <b>102</b> can interact with the system <b>100</b> through a wide variety of different advertiser access devices <b>114</b>. The capabilities and configurations of the particular advertiser access device <b>114</b> will depend on the particular function being performed. For example, a cell phone with Internet access may be an acceptable advertiser access device <b>114</b> to view a report, while being unsuitable for the creation and submission of a graphic to be included in an updated listing <b>104</b>.

p-0175Any device capable of providing the advertiser <b>102</b> with access to the functionality of the system <b>100</b> can function as an advertiser access device <b>114</b>. Advertiser access devices <b>114</b> are typically some type of client device capable of interacting with a computer network, such as the Internet. Examples of advertiser access devices <b>114</b> include: desktop computers, laptop computers, mainframe computers, mini-computers, cell phones, pagers, personal digital assistants (“PDAs”), or other devices (collectively “computer access devices”). In some circumstances, access devices can also be non-computer devices, such as fax machines, standard telephones with computerized answering options, paper copies of correspondence, and other communication mechanisms. Non-computerized access devices typically require additional human intervention for information to be loaded onto the system <b>100</b>.

p-01763. Advertiser Interfaces

p-0177As indicated by an arrow pointing from the advertiser access device <b>114</b> to an advertiser interface <b>116</b>, and an arrow from the advertiser interface <b>116</b> to a server <b>118</b>, the advertiser interface <b>116</b> is the mechanism by which the advertiser <b>102</b> (through the advertiser access device <b>114</b>) interacts with the system <b>100</b>.

p-0178In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the advertiser interface <b>116</b> is a web page accessed by an Internet browser residing within the advertiser access device <b>114</b>. In other embodiments, the interface <b>116</b> may be a wide variety of user interfaces known in the art, such as graphical user interfaces (“GUI”), text-based interfaces, or any other interface capable of being utilized to transmit listing attributes <b>106</b> to the system <b>100</b>, or for receiving reports from the system <b>100</b>.

p-0179B. Information Technology Infrastructure

p-0180The system <b>100</b> can be implemented in wide variety of different ways. Any configuration of components capable of storing and then accessing information can be used by the system <b>100</b> to perform the functionality of the system <b>100</b>. Listing attributes <b>106</b> provided by advertisers <b>102</b> must be stored in some way by the system <b>100</b>, so that the system <b>100</b> can provide users <b>130</b> with the information that they desire.

p-01811. Servers

p-0182As indicated by the arrow disposed between advertiser interface <b>116</b> and a server <b>118</b>, the server <b>118</b> is used to receive listing attributes <b>106</b> from advertisers <b>102</b>. The server <b>118</b> can be any device or configuration of devices capable of receiving information from one or more interfaces, and housing a set of instructions <b>120</b> needed to provide the functionality of the system <b>100</b>.

p-0183In many embodiments, the server <b>118</b> is one or more web servers, with the system <b>100</b> being provided to users <b>130</b> without any charge, through the use of an Internet connection.

p-01842. Instructions

p-0185As indicated by the two-way arrow disposed between the server <b>118</b> and a set of instructions <b>120</b>, and from the instructions <b>120</b> to a database structure <b>126</b>, the instructions <b>120</b> are the mechanism within the server <b>118</b> that interact with the storage of information by the system <b>100</b>,

p-0186Any mechanism capable of supporting the logic of the system <b>100</b> can be the instructions <b>120</b>. In many embodiments, the instructions <b>120</b> are the various applications, computer programs, and associated files used to support the logic of the system <b>100</b> necessary for the functioning of the system <b>100</b>.

p-0187In many embodiments, the instructions <b>120</b> will be written in an object-oriented language that is platform independent, such as the JAVA® programming language.

p-01883. Administrative Rules

p-0189In supporting the functionality of the system <b>100</b>, the instructions <b>120</b> incorporate various administrative rules <b>122</b> that are configured by an administrator of the system <b>100</b> (the role of the “administrator” is discussed below). The administrative rules <b>122</b>, which are discussed in greater detail below, include the particular hierarchies incorporated into the system, and different ways for grouping various listings <b>104</b> to meet the needs of advertisers <b>102</b> and users <b>130</b>. For example, the administrative rules <b>122</b> can define the particular sub-categories that are associated with the “restaurant” category.

p-01904. Database Structures

p-0191As indicated by the two-way arrow disposed between the instructions <b>120</b> and a database structure <b>126</b> and the bracket originating from the database structure <b>126</b> and encompassing a variety of listing records <b>128</b>, the database structure <b>126</b> is the mechanism by which the system <b>100</b> accesses the listing records <b>128</b>.

p-0192In many embodiments, the database structure <b>126</b> is one or more relational databases. In some alternative embodiments, object-oriented or hierarchical databases can be used. Other methods for storing information, such as arrays, pointers, flat files, and other data storage techniques can be incorporated into the system <b>100</b> as the “database structure” <b>126</b>.

p-01935. Listing Records

p-0194The listings <b>104</b> and listing attributes <b>106</b> provided to the system <b>100</b> by the advertiser <b>102</b> are stored, updated, processed, and accessed in the form of a variety of listing records <b>128</b> that reside within the database structure <b>126</b>. At discussed above, the contents of listing <b>104</b> can vary widely, and thus the contents of the listing records <b>128</b> can also vary widely.

p-0195As illustrated by the bracket originating from the listing records <b>128</b> and encompassing a variety of detailed views <b>127</b> and summary views <b>129</b>, each listing record <b>128</b> may include both a detailed view <b>127</b> and a summary view <b>129</b>. However, some listing records <b>128</b> may only be associated with a detailed view <b>127</b> while other listing records <b>128</b> may only be associated with a summary view <b>129</b>. A properly configured database structure <b>126</b> should be able to incorporate the data fields necessary for both types of views. Alternative embodiments of the system <b>100</b> may include additional potential views that can be associated with the various listing records <b>128</b>.

p-0196In a typical embodiment of the system <b>100</b>, the summary view <b>129</b> of a listing record <b>128</b> is displayed when the listing record <b>128</b> is displayed in a list of listings <b>104</b>, and the detailed view <b>127</b> of a listing record <b>128</b> is displayed when only one or two listings <b>104</b> is actively viewable by the user <b>130</b>.

p-0197Detailed views <b>127</b> can include potentially all of the information in the listing record <b>126</b>, while summary views <b>129</b> are typically configured to only present the type of information that would be most important to the user <b>130</b> in the initial viewing of the response <b>144</b> such as name and a geographical attribute. Detailed views <b>127</b> can include information such as: an operating hours attribute, a historical attribute (including an established date), a method of payment attribute, a brand attribute, an e-mail address attribute, a web site attribute, an address attribute, a phone number attribute, and a fax number attribute.

p-0198C. Users

p-0199A user <b>130</b> is any person, organization, or other entity that uses the system <b>100</b> to obtain information about advertiser <b>102</b>. Users <b>130</b> can interact with the system <b>100</b> through various individuals affiliated with the user <b>120</b>, such as employees, contractors, or agents. Users <b>130</b> can also interact with the system <b>100</b> through various information technology mechanisms, such as software applications that are configured or adapted to interface with the system <b>100</b>. Such interfacing advertiser applications can interact with the system <b>100</b> in both an automated and manual manner, engaging in batch, real-time, schedule, and ad-hoc interactions.

p-0200In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the user <b>130</b> can also be referred to as a buyer, a purchaser, a requestor, a searcher, or a consumer. Users <b>130</b> are typically potential purchasers of various goods, services, or other offerings (collectively “products”). However, users <b>130</b> can also include individuals or organizations desiring to communicate with “advertisers” <b>102</b> to pursue future interactions. For example, users <b>130</b> could be potentially new members for churches, political parties, community action groups, employers, and other organizations seeking new members and volunteers. A user <b>130</b> can be any entity seeking to obtain information about the existence of another entity (the advertiser <b>102</b>) through one or more listings <b>104</b> residing on the system <b>100</b>.

p-0201As indicated by the arrow originating from the advertiser <b>130</b> and pointing to a request <b>132</b>, users <b>130</b> create requests <b>132</b> and submit them to the system <b>100</b>.

p-0202Although only one user <b>130</b> is displayed in the Figure, it is anticipated that millions of different users <b>130</b> could submit requests <b>132</b> and receive responses <b>144</b> using the system <b>100</b>. The capacity of the system <b>100</b> is only limited by the information technology architecture that supports the functionality of the system <b>100</b>.

p-02031. Requests and Request Attributes

p-0204Requests <b>132</b> are invocations by users <b>130</b> to obtain information. The purpose of the system <b>100</b> is to respond to requests <b>132</b>. In some embodiments, requests <b>132</b> can be stored by the system <b>100</b> in building a profile for various users <b>130</b>. The policy behind such a practice would be that users <b>130</b> are likely to have reoccurring interests that they would prefer the system <b>100</b> to maintain. In other embodiments, users <b>130</b> can save particular requests <b>132</b>, but such activities require the affirmative decision of the user <b>130</b>. Some embodiments of the system <b>100</b> may include both user profiles and the ability to save requests <b>132</b>.

p-0205As indicated by the bracket extending from the request and encompassing a variety of request attributes <b>134</b>, the requests <b>132</b> received by the system <b>100</b> can be said to possess or be associated with, various request attributes <b>134</b>. Request attributes <b>134</b> can be set by the user <b>130</b> in accordance with the parameters set by the administrative rules <b>122</b> of the system <b>100</b>. Request attributes <b>134</b> provide users <b>130</b> with the flexibility to target or focus their requests to listings <b>104</b> likely to be of interest to the user <b>130</b>.

p-0206Although request attributes <b>134</b> can vary widely from request <b>132</b> to request <b>132</b> (even within the context of a single user <b>130</b> within a single embodiment of the system <b>100</b>), in many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, there are similarities with respect to the particular types of information used by the system <b>100</b> as request attributes <b>134</b> to describe or define requests <b>132</b>. Request attributes <b>134</b> can be described as various selections made by users <b>130</b>. Two important types of request attributes <b>134</b> typically include a geography selection <b>136</b> and a category selection <b>138</b>. In many embodiments, request attributes <b>134</b> can include one or more “blank” or “null” values.

p-0207a. Geography Selections

p-0208As indicated by the bracket extending from the request attributes <b>134</b> and encompassing the geography selection <b>136</b>, one type of characteristic or request attribute <b>134</b> that can be helpful to focus requests <b>132</b> is the characteristic of geography.

p-0209Geography selections <b>136</b> related to specific geographic regions that are of interest to the user <b>130</b>. Examples of geography selections can include, but are not limited to, a: street address, city, county, state, zip code, country, continent, longitude, latitude, elevation, phone number, fax number, terrain (such as mountainous, forest, jungle, etc.) or any other indicia of geographical information that could be of interest to a user <b>130</b> in focusing a request <b>132</b> for information. In some embodiments, a business name and/or phone number are types of geographic selections <b>136</b>.

p-0210In a preferred embodiment, geography selections <b>136</b> selected by the user <b>130</b> correspond to a particular identification or location within a geography hierarchy defined by the administrative rules <b>122</b> that are described in greater detail below. In other embodiments, geography selections <b>136</b> correspond to geography attributes <b>108</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b> stored within the system <b>100</b>.

p-0211Geography selections <b>136</b> can be made by users <b>130</b> through the typing of text into an editable field, the checking of boxes or radio buttons on a screen, the use of a mouse to select the desired geography selection from a list box, pull-down screen or data window, using a light pen or other device to select the desired geographical region on a map, or through any other mechanism that is convenient for users <b>130</b>, and capable of capturing the desired geography selections <b>136</b>. A single request <b>132</b> can include multiple geography selections <b>136</b>. For example, city and zip code information can be supplied as part of the same request <b>132</b>.

p-0212Geography selections <b>136</b> and their impact on the processing performed by the system <b>100</b>, are described in greater detail below.

p-0213b. Category Selections

p-0214In a preferred embodiment, category selections <b>138</b> by the user <b>130</b> correspond to a particular location within a category hierarchy defined by the administrative rules <b>122</b> that are described in greater detail below. In such embodiments, a directory structure embodying the category hierarchy can be used by users <b>130</b> to submit their request <b>132</b>. In other embodiments, category selections <b>138</b> are captured through text fields or other forms of user input that is incorporated into the request <b>132</b>. In some embodiment, the system <b>100</b> can use a dictionary of synonyms and various synonym heuristics and metrics to better match the entries made by the user and the category attributes <b>110</b> associated with the various listing records <b>128</b> stored within the system <b>100</b>. In some embodiments, a business name and/or business phone number are types of category selections <b>138</b>.

p-0215One or more category selections <b>138</b> can be used by the system <b>100</b> to select listing records <b>128</b> from the database structure <b>126</b>. For example, after selecting the category of “consumer electronics” a user <b>130</b> may then decide that what they are interested in is really “personal computers.” Category selections <b>138</b> can include any attribute or information about the offering of an advertiser <b>102</b> that would be potentially be of interest or use to the user <b>130</b> seeking to obtain information in a focused manner. In some embodiments, multiple category selections <b>138</b> can be joined in the same request <b>132</b>. For example, a user <b>130</b> might want to investigate movie theaters and nearby restaurants in tandem. Another example of a multiple category selection <b>138</b> within the same request <b>132</b> would be the inclusion of both “bars” and “restaurants” in trying to pick a good meeting place for friendly gathering.

p-0216Category selections <b>138</b> and their impact on the processing performed by the system <b>100</b>, are described in greater detail below.

p-0217c. Review/Rating Requests

p-0218In one embodiment, review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> are included in request <b>132</b>, thus allowing user <b>130</b> greater control over which listings <b>104</b> are included in response <b>144</b>. In one embodiment, review and/or rating selection <b>139</b> is a numerical threshold rating selected by user <b>130</b>. For example, administrative rules <b>122</b> could provide a rating scale from 1 to 10, and allow user <b>130</b> to input a number between 1 and 10 indicative of a threshold rating that an advertiser <b>102</b> must surpass in order for its listing <b>104</b> to be included in a response <b>144</b>. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many different numerical rating systems with many different scales and/or ranges would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention.

p-0219Review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> may include a general, or aggregate, rating to be associated with a listing <b>104</b>. However, review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> may also include selections for any review/rating attributes <b>109</b> that are included within the system. Moreover review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> may include a selection for only one review/rating attribute <b>109</b> such as aggregate rating or some other review/rating attribute <b>109</b> such as price or quality of customer service, or review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> could include selections for multiple review/rating attributes <b>109</b>. For example, multiple review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> could encompass selections for review/rating attributes <b>109</b> including price, quality, and timeliness of delivery.

p-0220Further, in some embodiments in which user <b>130</b> can make multiple review and/or rating selections <b>139</b>, user <b>130</b> can also specify weights that attach to each review and/or rating selection <b>139</b>. For example, user <b>130</b> could be provided with means for inputting weights on a scale of 0 to 1, and could choose to attach weights to review/rating attributes <b>109</b> such that price had a weight of 0.8, quality had a weight of 0.6, and timeliness of delivery had a weight of 1.

p-0221d. Enhanced Requests

p-0222In order to facilitate the needs and goals of users <b>130</b>, the requests <b>132</b> submitted by users <b>130</b> can be enhanced in various respects.

p-0223i. Supplemental Requests

p-0224Some requests <b>132</b> are enhanced by follow-up activities by the user <b>130</b>. These enhanced requests <b>132</b> can be referred to as supplemental requests. An example of a supplemental request <b>132</b> is a follow-up screen that asks the user <b>130</b> for additional information. For example, if a particular company provides a wide variety of vastly different products, at different geographic locations, entering in a business name as part of the request <b>132</b> may result in the system <b>100</b> prompting the user <b>130</b> for additional information about what product the user <b>130</b> is looking for or for the appropriate geographical location. In one preferred embodiment, the category attributes <b>110</b> associated with the particular company are displayed to facilitate refinement of the request.

p-0225In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the response <b>144</b> is provided to the user <b>130</b> while simultaneously providing the user <b>130</b> with the means to supplement their request <b>132</b>.

p-0226ii. Augmented Requests

p-0227Requests <b>132</b> can also be enhanced in an automated fashion by the system <b>100</b>.

p-0228In one exemplary approach, the request <b>132</b> is adjusted by system <b>100</b> because of potential undesirable consequences to accepting the request in an unaltered form. For instance, if the request <b>132</b> submitted by the user <b>130</b> is somehow incomplete, in error, or otherwise ambiguous, it can be augmented or clarified by the system <b>100</b> in accordance with pre-defined heuristics. One illustration of an augmented request <b>132</b> is a request containing spelling errors that is corrected by the system <b>100</b>. Another illustration of an augmented request <b>132</b> is the accessing of a lexicon of synonyms by the system <b>100</b> so that a request <b>132</b> for “bars” catches listings <b>104</b> for “nightclubs” and “taverns.” A further illustration of an augmented request adjusted by the system is a matching of a generic term with brand names applicable to the term.

p-0229Requests <b>132</b> can also be augmented with respect to geography selections <b>136</b>. For example, the network location (such as an IP address) of the user access device <b>140</b> can be used to obtain geography information that is not provided by the user <b>130</b>.

p-0230In another exemplary approach, the prior history of interactions (“user history”) between the user <b>130</b> and the system <b>100</b>, a user profile, or other forms of system “intelligence” about the desires of the user <b>130</b> can be used to augment the requests <b>132</b> made by the user <b>130</b>. For example, as described below, a user profile might indicate a user's ranking of the importance of geography selections <b>136</b>, category selections <b>138</b>, and review and/or rating selections <b>139</b>. In the example above relating to a business offering vastly different products, the system <b>100</b> might default to a particular product that has been of interest in the past to the user <b>130</b>.

p-0231In many embodiments, the user <b>130</b> is asked to confirm the assumptions, presumptions, and defaults involved in augmented requests <b>132</b>.

p-02322. User Access Devices

p-0233A user access device <b>140</b> is the device through which the user <b>130</b> interacts with the system <b>100</b>. As indicated by the arrows pointing to and away from the user access device <b>140</b>, the user access device <b>140</b> is the means by which requests <b>132</b> are submitted to the system <b>100</b>, and the means by which a response <b>144</b> is received by the submitting user <b>130</b>.

p-0234Users <b>130</b> can interact with the system <b>100</b> through a wide variety of different user access devices <b>140</b>. Any device capable of providing the user <b>130</b> with the ability to submit requests <b>132</b> to the system <b>100</b> and receive responses <b>144</b> from the system <b>100</b> can function as a user access device <b>140</b>. User access devices <b>140</b> are typically some type of client device capable of interacting with a computer network, such as the Internet. Examples of user access devices <b>140</b> include: desktop computers, laptop computers, mainframe computers, mini-computers, cell phones, pagers, personal digital assistants (“PDAs”), or other devices (collectively “computer access devices”). In some circumstances, access devices can also be non-computer devices, such as fax machines, standard telephones, telephones with computerized answering options, and other communication mechanisms. Non-computerized access devices typically require additional human intervention for information to be loaded onto the system <b>100</b> or to receive responses <b>144</b> provided by the system <b>100</b>.

p-02353. User Interfaces

p-0236As indicated by an arrow pointing from the user access device <b>140</b> to and from a user interface <b>142</b>, the arrow pointing from the user interface <b>142</b> to the server <b>118</b>, and the arrow from the response <b>144</b> to the user interface <b>142</b>, the user interface <b>142</b> is the interface by which the user <b>130</b> interacts with the system <b>100</b>. Requests <b>132</b> are submitted to the system <b>100</b> through the user interface <b>142</b>, and responses <b>144</b> are sent by the system <b>100</b> to the user <b>130</b> through the user interface <b>142</b>.

p-0237In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the user interface <b>142</b> is a web page accessed by an Internet browser residing within the user access device <b>140</b>. In other embodiments, the user interface <b>142</b> may be a wide variety of user interfaces known in the art, such as graphical user interfaces (“GUI”), text-based interfaces, or any other interface capable of being utilized to transmit requests <b>132</b> to the system <b>100</b> and receive responses <b>144</b> from the system <b>100</b>.

p-02384. Responses

p-0239A response <b>144</b> is transmitted by the system <b>100</b> from the server <b>118</b> to the user <b>130</b> through the user interface <b>142</b> and the user access device <b>140</b>. Each request <b>132</b> received by the system <b>100</b> typically results in the transmission of one response <b>144</b>. Responses can be sufficiently large as to require the user <b>130</b> to scroll through several pages of listings <b>104</b> in order to view the entire response <b>144</b>.

p-0240In some alternative embodiments, a single request <b>132</b> could result in multiple responses <b>144</b>, and multiple requests <b>132</b> could be aggregated into a single response <b>144</b>.

p-0241Responses <b>144</b>, and the one or more groups of listings that make up the response <b>144</b>, are discussed in greater detail below.

p-0242D. Administrator

p-0243As discussed above, the functionality of advertisers <b>102</b> submitting listings <b>104</b>, and the functionality of users <b>130</b> submitting requests <b>132</b> and receiving responses <b>144</b>, can occur in a highly automated manner requiring little or no human interaction. However, discussed above, the system <b>100</b> is configured by various administrative rules <b>122</b>. Those administrative rules <b>122</b> are the responsibility of an administrator <b>160</b>.

p-0244<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is an environmental block diagram illustrating one example of the administrative aspects of an information distribution system <b>100</b>, including the components used by the administrator <b>160</b> to support the performance of the system <b>100</b>, the types of information processed by administrator <b>160</b> of the system <b>100</b>, and some of the ways in which administrator <b>160</b> interacts with the system <b>100</b>.

p-0245An administrator <b>160</b> is any person, organization, or other entity that provides the system <b>100</b> used by advertisers <b>102</b> to submit listings <b>104</b> and by users <b>130</b> to send requests <b>132</b> and receive responses <b>144</b>. Administrators <b>160</b> can interact with the system <b>100</b> through various individuals affiliated with the administrator <b>160</b>, such as employees, contractors, or agents. The administrator <b>160</b> can also interact with the system <b>100</b> through various information technology mechanisms, such as software applications that are configured or adapted to interface with the system <b>100</b>. Such interfacing advertiser applications can interact with the system <b>100</b> in both an automated and manual manner, engaging in batch, real-time, schedule, and ad-hoc interactions. As the maintainer of the system <b>100</b>, the administrator <b>160</b> can also modify the performance of the system <b>100</b> outside of the software applications or other instructions <b>120</b> that make up the system <b>100</b>.

p-0246A particular individual can interact with the system <b>100</b> through more than one role. For example, the administrator <b>160</b> can also exist as advertisers <b>102</b> within the system <b>100</b> by providing listings <b>104</b> to the system <b>100</b>. That same administrator <b>160</b> may access the system <b>100</b> as a user <b>130</b> to obtain information for personal or household use.

p-0247The most important function of the administrator <b>160</b> involves the administrative rules <b>122</b>, which control how the system <b>100</b> works. For example, administrative rules <b>122</b> determine what listings <b>104</b> are included in a response <b>144</b>, and how those listings <b>104</b> are ordered or placed in a response <b>144</b>. Administrative rules <b>122</b> are submitted to the system <b>100</b> through an administrator access device <b>161</b>.

p-02481. Administrator Access Devices

p-0249Administrators <b>160</b> can interact with the system <b>100</b> through a wide variety of different administrator access devices <b>161</b>. The capabilities and configurations of the particular administrator access device <b>161</b> will depend on the particular function being performed. For example, a cell phone with Internet access may be an acceptable administrator access device <b>161</b> to view a report, while being unsuitable for the creation or modification of the instructions <b>120</b> which implement the administrative rules <b>122</b>.

p-0250An administrator <b>160</b> interacts with the system <b>100</b> through one or more administrator access devices <b>161</b>. The administrator access device <b>161</b> can allow the administrator <b>160</b> to configure the system <b>100</b> by accessing the instructions <b>120</b> through an administrator interface <b>162</b>. Certain modifications to the system <b>100</b> will require that the administrator <b>160</b> modify the instructions <b>120</b>, the administrative rules <b>122</b> and/or the database structure <b>126</b> in ways that cannot be accomplished within the scope of the software application(s). Such interactions can also be performed using the administrator access device <b>161</b>.

p-0251Any device capable of providing the administrator <b>160</b> with access to the functionality of the system <b>100</b> or access to the information technology architecture that underlies the system <b>100</b> can function as an administrator access device <b>161</b>. Examples of administrator access devices <b>161</b> include: desktop computers, laptop computers, mainframe computers, mini-computers, cell phones, pagers, personal digital assistants (“PDAs”), work stations, or other devices (collectively “computer access devices”).

p-02523. Administrator Interfaces

p-0253As indicated by an arrow pointing from the administrator access device <b>161</b> to an administrator interface <b>162</b>, and from the administrator interface <b>162</b> to the server <b>118</b>, the administrator interface <b>162</b> is the mechanism by which the administrator access device <b>161</b> and the administrator <b>160</b> interact with the system <b>100</b> with respect to activities that occur through the use of the software application or instructions <b>120</b>, and in contrast to those activities that are performed outside of the instructions <b>120</b> by more directly interacting with the information technology architecture.

p-0254The administrator interface <b>162</b> will typically be some type of graphical user interface for configuring the instructions <b>120</b>, the database structure <b>126</b>, the administrative rules <b>122</b> and/or the system <b>100</b>. In some embodiments, certain functionality may be performed through a web page accessed by an Internet browser so long as the administrator <b>160</b> using the administrator interface <b>162</b> provides the appropriate login information and password. The administrator interface <b>162</b> and the advertiser interface <b>116</b> should operate through secure connections to prevent misuse. In contrast, user interfaces <b>142</b> need not function through secure connections. Even embodiments where users <b>130</b> can build profiles and save various responses <b>144</b> need not be secured, although it may be desirable to provide secure connections when practical.

p-02554. Administrative Rules

p-0256The administrative rules <b>122</b> that make up the system <b>100</b> can take on a wide variety of forms. Each embodiment of the system <b>100</b> can involve different types and combinations of administrative rules <b>122</b>. The system <b>100</b> need not include all of the different types of administrative rules identified in the Figure.

p-0257a. Category Hierarchy

p-0258A category hierarchy <b>164</b> can be used by the system <b>100</b> to take into consideration the relationships between different categories, sub-categories, and category attributes <b>110</b>. The user interface <b>142</b> can provide the category hierarchy <b>164</b> to users <b>130</b> in the form of a directory so that the user <b>130</b> can make category selections <b>138</b> without needing to type in any text. The category hierarchy <b>164</b> can be pre-defined by the administrator <b>160</b>. The administrator <b>160</b> may need to update the category hierarchy <b>164</b> from time to time as new offering categories develop. For example, product categories such as digital video cameras and DVD burners are relatively new, as compared to film cameras and tape recorders. Dissimilar systems <b>100</b> can incorporate different category hierarchies <b>164</b> of varying depths. Different categories may be associated with varying numbers of subcategories. Processing involving the category hierarchy <b>164</b> is discussed in greater detail below.

p-0259b. Geography Hierarchy

p-0260A geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can be used by the system <b>100</b> to take into consideration the relationships between different geographical regions and geography attributes <b>108</b>. The user interface <b>142</b> can provide the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> to users <b>130</b> in the form of a directory so that the user <b>130</b> can make geography selections <b>136</b> without needing to type in any text. However, in many embodiments, information such as street addresses, cities, and zip codes, will typically be typed in by users <b>130</b>. The geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can include information relating to a general classification of geographical scope. For example, a particular geographic region can be associated with the label of being a nation, state/region, county, or city. Different systems <b>100</b> can incorporate different geography hierarchies <b>166</b> of varying depth. Different geographical regions may be associated with varying numbers of sub-regions. For example, a heavily populated urban area (e.g., New York City) may use additional geographic attributes to break down the region into yet smaller geographical regions, while a county in Alaska may not be associated with any cities. Processing involving the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> is discussed in greater detail below.

p-0261c. Fee Type Hierarchy

p-0262The system <b>100</b> can incorporate a wide variety of different fee types that can be used to charge advertisers <b>102</b> for their listings <b>104</b>. The system <b>100</b> can be configured to prioritize and display listings <b>104</b> on the basis of distinctions relating to fee attributes associated with the listing <b>104</b>, include fee type information. In some embodiments, different fee types <b>112</b> can possess a hierarchical relationship with other fee types <b>112</b>, and those relationships can be represented in the form a fee type hierarchy <b>168</b>. Dissimilar systems <b>100</b> can incorporate different fee type hierarchies <b>168</b> of varying depths. Different fee types <b>112</b> may be associated with varying numbers of sub-types. Processing involving the fee type hierarchy <b>168</b> is discussed in greater detail below.

p-0263d. Review/Rating Information

p-0264In some embodiments the system <b>100</b> uses a variety of different kinds of review and/or rating information <b>171</b> to account for feedback provided by users <b>130</b> regarding various advertisers <b>102</b> and their associated listings <b>104</b>. Review and/or rating information <b>171</b> generally includes a rating on a numerical scale that has been assigned to an advertiser <b>102</b> and/or a listing, e.g., seven out of ten, or four stars out of five, etc. Further, in some embodiments, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can include a textual description or summary of feedback provided by users <b>130</b>. Further, in many embodiments, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> includes multiple ratings associated with multiple review/rating attributes <b>109</b> associated with a listing <b>104</b>. Examples of review/rating attributes <b>109</b> are provided above, and those skilled in the art will recognize that a wide variety of review/rating attributes <b>109</b> may be associated with review and/or rating information <b>171</b> for a listing <b>104</b>. In some embodiments, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> includes ratings tiers <b>173</b>. As described in more detail below with reference to <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 39</figref>, each review and/or rating information <b>171</b> for a listing <b>104</b> may be assigned a rating tier <b>173</b> that is essentially a weight indicating the importance of review and/or rating information <b>171</b> relative to review and/or rating information <b>171</b> assigned to other tiers.

p-0265Review and/or rating information <b>171</b> may be used in conjunction with information from category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b> and/or fee type hierarchy <b>168</b>. Processing involving review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is discussed in greater detail below.

p-0266e. Result Heuristic

p-0267A result heuristic <b>170</b> is the process by which the results of a request <b>132</b> are obtained. If the system <b>100</b> incorporates different hierarchies, then the relationships embodied in those hierarchies should be utilized by the result heuristic <b>170</b>. In many embodiments, the result heuristic <b>170</b> and the process performed by a response heuristic <b>172</b> are identical. However, in some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, certain listings <b>104</b> contained in the “result” generated by the result heuristic <b>170</b> are not placed within the “response” <b>144</b> generated by a response heuristic <b>172</b>. That is because in some embodiments, certain listings <b>104</b> are deemed to be of less interest to the user <b>130</b>, and are thus not included in the response <b>144</b>. In other words, in certain embodiments, the response heuristic <b>172</b> is configured to be more selective than the result heuristic <b>170</b> if the result heuristic <b>170</b> identifies a sufficient number of listings <b>104</b> to be included in the response <b>144</b> to the user <b>130</b>. The administrator <b>160</b> may have additional reasons to exclude a listing <b>104</b> that would otherwise be displayed to the user <b>130</b>. For example, if the advertiser <b>102</b> had not yet paid the per-hit fees for the past month or other specified period, the listing <b>104</b> could be excluded by the response heuristic <b>172</b> even though it was included in the results produced by the results heuristic <b>170</b>.

p-0268Processing to identify and populate the response <b>144</b> with relevant listings <b>104</b> is described in greater detail below.

p-0269f. Response Heuristic

p-0270The response heuristic <b>172</b> is the process performed by the system <b>100</b> to populate the response <b>144</b>. In many embodiments, there is no difference between the response <b>144</b> and the result, and thus there is no result heuristic <b>170</b> that is distinct from the response heuristic <b>172</b>. However, the system <b>100</b> is flexible enough to incorporate a different heuristic to generate an initial tentative pool of listings <b>104</b>, and then to follow-up by potentially removing certain listings <b>104</b> from the pool of listings <b>104</b> that are ultimately provided to the user <b>104</b> in the form of a response <b>144</b>. The response heuristic <b>172</b> also formats the response <b>144</b>, and formats the display and otherwise organizes the contents of the response <b>144</b>. The response heuristic <b>172</b> includes the functionality of a placement heuristic <b>174</b>, the process by which the system <b>100</b> makes placement decisions regarding the listings <b>104</b> in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0271The response heuristic <b>172</b> should include as inputs, any of the data hierarchies (such as the category hierarchy <b>164</b> or geography hierarchy <b>166</b>) supported by the system <b>100</b>. Information within the detailed view <b>127</b> of listings can be acted upon by the system <b>100</b> to re-sort, re-position, or otherwise alter the display of the various listings <b>104</b> disclosed to the user <b>130</b> within the response <b>144</b>.

p-0272Processing to identify and populate the response <b>144</b> with relevant listings <b>104</b> is described in greater detail below.

p-0273g. Placement Heuristic

p-0274As identified by the bracket originating from the response heuristic <b>172</b> and encompassing the placement heuristic <b>174</b>, the placement heuristic <b>174</b> is a sub-process that is part of the response heuristic <b>172</b>. The placement heuristic <b>174</b> determines the placement and order of various listings <b>104</b>. Any of the different attributes processed by the system <b>100</b> can be used by the placement heuristic <b>174</b> to arrange the display of the response <b>144</b>. For example, in response to a national request, the placement heuristic <b>174</b> may be configured to give the best three spots to listings associated with the three highest fixed fee amounts <b>111</b>, while providing spots four and five to the listings <b>104</b> associated with the top two per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b>. In many embodiments, the placement heuristics <b>174</b> performed by the system <b>100</b> can be influenced by a priority metric <b>179</b> (discussed below). Alternative influences on the placement heuristic <b>174</b> can include but are not limited to affiliation with a particular group <b>232</b>, fee types <b>112</b>, per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b>, fixed fee amounts <b>111</b>, geography attributes <b>108</b>, category attributes <b>110</b>, review/rating attributes <b>109</b>, the number of reviews and/or ratings in review and/or rating information <b>171</b>, a date/time stamp, and/or a variety of different listing attributes <b>106</b> pertaining to a particular listing <b>104</b>. The placement heuristic <b>174</b> can also be influenced by the administrative rules <b>122</b> and request attributes <b>134</b>.

p-0275A tier placement heuristic is a placement heuristic <b>174</b> that is specific to one or more tiers <b>169</b>. Tier placement heuristics <b>174</b> can vary as widely as any other placement heuristic <b>174</b>.

p-0276Many different examples of placement processing are discussed in greater detail below.

p-0277h. Priority Metric

p-0278A priority metric <b>179</b> can be used by the placement heuristic <b>174</b> to identify the desired order of various listings <b>104</b>. The inputs for the calculation of the priority metric <b>179</b> can include virtually any of the listing attributes <b>106</b> and request attributes <b>134</b> relating to the listing <b>104</b>.

p-0279In some embodiments, the priority metric <b>179</b> is calculated from the type fees <b>112</b> paid by the particular advertiser <b>102</b> and a position adjustment factor <b>176</b> to incorporate the broader relationship between the administrator <b>160</b> and the advertiser <b>102</b>. In those embodiments, listings <b>104</b> are organized into various groups on the basis of category attributes <b>110</b>, geography attributes <b>108</b>, review/rating attributes <b>109</b>, per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b>, fixed fee amounts <b>111</b>, and/or fee type attributes <b>112</b>. The priority metric <b>179</b> is typically used within those group boundaries to determine the order of intra-group listings <b>104</b>. Inter-group prioritization is typically determined by the relative desirability of the groups themselves, and not the individual priority metric <b>179</b> associated with the individual listings <b>104</b>.

p-0280In other embodiments, the categorical and geographical scope of the listings <b>104</b> directly impact the priority metric <b>179</b> and all prioritization occurs on an inter-group basis.

p-0281The priority metric <b>179</b> can influenced by a popularity metric that takes into consideration the number of “hits” associated with a particular listing <b>104</b> over a particular period of time. The priority metric <b>179</b> can also be influenced by a relevance metric that takes into consideration the estimated relevance of a particular listing <b>104</b> with respect to the particular request <b>132</b> submitted the user <b>130</b>. In some embodiments the relevance metric may consider, among other things, a review/rating selection <b>139</b>. The relevance metric may also be based on a user profile that ranks the relative importance to the user <b>130</b> of geography selections <b>136</b>, category selections <b>138</b>, and/or review and/or ratings selections <b>139</b>.

p-0282Group-based processing and the use of the priority metric <b>179</b> are described in greater detail below.

p-0283i. Position Adjustment Factor

p-0284A position adjustment factor <b>176</b> is the mechanism by which relationship-based attributes between the administrator organization <b>160</b> and the advertiser <b>102</b> can be used to impact the processing of listing-based attributes. In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, a profile is maintained for each advertiser <b>102</b>. The advertiser profile can be used by the system <b>100</b> to calculate or otherwise generate the position adjustment factor <b>176</b> in an automated manner without any human intervention. In other embodiments, the position adjustment factor <b>176</b> may be less dynamic, or may be entirely absent from the system <b>100</b>.

p-0285The position adjustment factor <b>176</b> can be used to impact the calculation of the priority metric <b>179</b> for a particular listing <b>104</b>. The purpose of the position adjustment factor <b>176</b> is to take into consideration the broader relationship between the advertiser <b>102</b> and the administrator <b>160</b>. For example, a loyalty factor that includes the length of time that the advertiser <b>102</b> has paid for listings on the system <b>100</b> can be used to adjust the priority metric <b>179</b> in an upward direction. The position adjustment factor <b>176</b> can also include an analysis of activities outside or independent of the system <b>100</b>. For example, the size of an advertiser's advertising budget, the status of the advertiser <b>102</b> as a purchaser of other products, services or offerings sold by the administrator <b>160</b>, and any other consideration relevant to the goals of the administrator <b>160</b> can be incorporated into the priority metric <b>179</b> for a particular listing <b>104</b>. Considerations relating to the system <b>100</b> can also be incorporated as position adjustment factors <b>176</b>. Examples of position adjustment factors <b>176</b> include but are not limited to: the total number of listings <b>104</b> paid for by the advertiser <b>102</b>; the total number of categories in which the advertiser <b>102</b> has paid for listings; the geographic scope of the aggregate listings <b>104</b> paid for by the advertiser <b>102</b>; the total monies paid by the advertiser <b>102</b> to the administrator <b>160</b> over a pre-defined period of time; the number of ratings and/or reviews that a listing <b>104</b> has received from users <b>130</b>; and any other potentially relevant business factor relating to the administrator <b>160</b>.

p-0286The process for using position adjustment factors <b>176</b> to calculate the result heuristic <b>170</b> is discussed in greater detail below. Listings <b>104</b> that are affiliated with position adjustment factors <b>176</b> of a non-zero value can be referred to as “affiliated listings.” In some embodiments, position adjustment factors can be negative as well as positive values.

p-0287j. Group Hierarchy

p-0288To maximize the ability of the system <b>100</b> to focus on the desired goals of the user <b>130</b>, a fully normalized group hierarchy <b>178</b> can be used to support system <b>100</b> distinctions on the basis of each of the other data hierarchies supported by the system <b>100</b>. Whatever the relevant selections made in the request <b>132</b> submitted by the user <b>130</b>, the relevant groups to be included in the resulting response <b>144</b> can be identified. Only listings <b>104</b> affiliated with the appropriate groups are then used to populate the response <b>144</b>. For example, if the selections made by the user <b>130</b> include a geography selection of national advertisers with a service area in the city of Detroit, and the category selection of hair salons, one of the groups in the response will be made solely of national hair salons with service areas in the city of Detroit.

p-0289The utility and variations of group-based processing are discussed in greater detail below.

p-0290k. Minimum Fees/Minimum Metric Values

p-0291The ways in which fees are charged to advertisers <b>102</b> and the ways in which listings <b>104</b> are prioritized by the system <b>100</b> are subject to considerable configuration by the administrator <b>160</b> of the system <b>100</b>. One limitation that can be imposed on the system <b>100</b> is a minimum payment necessary to obtain a fixed-fee listing <b>104</b> or a per-hit listing <b>104</b>. The administrator <b>160</b> may determine that the overall profitability and utility of the system <b>100</b> is enhanced by encouraging advertisers <b>102</b> to pay a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> above a predetermined threshold, as through a bidding process. A per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> need not be related to bidding, however. Offers to pay a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> below the pre-determined threshold may not be worth the time and effort by the administrator <b>160</b>. Minimum fees <b>165</b> can distinguish between different listing attributes <b>106</b>. For example, local advertisers <b>102</b> for categories such as restaurants might be required to pay a larger minimum fee <b>165</b> because local listings <b>104</b> are more likely to result in a follow-up restaurant transaction by the user <b>104</b> than a national listing <b>104</b> for a bookstore without a service area in local geographical area.

p-0292Examples of minimum fees <b>165</b> being implemented by the system <b>100</b> are discussed in greater detail below. In embodiments of the system <b>100</b> where competition between listings <b>104</b> is not based on competitive bidding (bid-based approaches) the phrase “minimum bid amount” or “minimum metric value” may refer to a minimum value of whatever competitive metric is used by the system <b>100</b>. For example, if listings <b>104</b> compete on the basis of a relevancy metric, then a minimum metric value can be used in place of minimum bid amount <b>165</b>.

p-0293l. Minimum Bid Increments/Minimum Metric Increments

p-0294Just as the system <b>100</b> can place limitations on the minimum fee <b>165</b> needed for a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>, the system <b>100</b> can also be configured to require certain incremental bids when incorporated into a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> to achieve priority over listings <b>104</b> associated with a minimum fee <b>165</b>. For example, if the minimum per hit fee amount <b>113</b> is $0.40, the system <b>100</b> can be configured to require that a higher per hit fee amount <b>113</b> be at least $0.45.

p-0295Just as administrators <b>160</b> may set different minimum fees <b>165</b> for different groups on the group hierarchy <b>178</b>, administrators may also set different minimum bid increments <b>167</b>.

p-0296Examples of minimum bid increments <b>167</b> being incorporated into the system <b>100</b> are discussed in greater detail below,

p-0297In embodiments of the system <b>100</b> where competition between listings <b>104</b> is not based on competitive bidding (bid-based approaches) the phrase “minimum bid increments” or “minimum metric increments” may refer to a minimum value of whatever competitive metric is used by the system <b>100</b>. For example, if listings <b>104</b> compete on the basis of a relevancy metric, then a minimum metric increment can be used in place of minimum bid increment <b>167</b>.

p-0298m. Bid Tiers/Listing Tiers

p-0299As part of an effort to increase the per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b> associated with listings <b>104</b>, the administrative rules <b>122</b> can define a wide variety of different bid tiers <b>169</b>. All bids within the range of the bid tier <b>169</b> are ordered in accordance with a placement heuristic <b>174</b> that is particular to that tier, a tier placement heuristic. In many embodiments, the tier placement heuristic <b>174</b> orders listings <b>104</b> in a random fashion with respect to intra-tier positioning (a “random heuristic”). In other embodiments, a weighted random heuristic is used to order listings <b>104</b> within a particular tier <b>169</b>. With a weighted random heuristic. The per hit fee <b>113</b> (or whatever other metric such as a priority metric <b>179</b> is used to classify a particular listing <b>104</b> as belonging to a particular tier <b>169</b>) modifies what would otherwise be a purely random heuristic. For example, in a tier <b>169</b> consisting of two listings <b>104</b> that is defined by a per-hit fee <b>113</b>, the listing with twice the per-hit fee would have twice the likelihood of taking the “pole position” within the tier <b>169</b>, than the other listing <b>104</b> within the tier. Just as tier placement heuristics <b>174</b> can vary widely, a wide variety of different tier placement heuristics <b>174</b> can implemented within the same response <b>144</b>.

p-0300Some tiers <b>169</b> can be based on fixed value ranges, and involve a variable number of listings <b>104</b>. Bid tiers <b>169</b> can be based on bid ranges that are as small as fractions of a cent (using US monetary nomenclature) or as large as deemed desirable by the administrator <b>160</b>. For example, in a particular response, there may be anywhere between 0 and X (the number of listing <b>104</b> within the response) associated with a particular per-hit fee <b>113</b>.

p-0301In other embodiments, the number of tiers <b>169</b>, and the number of listings <b>104</b> within those tiers <b>169</b> are predefined in accordance with the administrative rules <b>122</b>. For example, a response <b>144</b> could be configured to include six tiers <b>169</b> of three listings <b>104</b> each. In such an environment, the ranges of values of per-hit fees <b>113</b> or any other competitive metric such as a priority metric <b>179</b> can be highly variable.

p-0302Listings <b>104</b> within the system <b>100</b> can be selectively identified by the system <b>100</b> as belonging to a particular tier <b>169</b> on the basis of a per hit fee <b>113</b> associated with the listing, a priority metric <b>179</b> associated with the listing, or any other listing-based attribute <b>106</b>. In a preferred embodiment, tiers <b>169</b> are defined with respect to rankings relating to priority metrics <b>179</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b>.

p-0303n. Enhanced Display Fee

p-0304An enhanced display fee <b>163</b> can be charged for listings <b>104</b> in conjunction with various pre-defined “prominence products” offered by the administrator <b>160</b>. Prominence products relate to listing attributes that impact how a listing is perceived by users <b>130</b>. The following listing attributes <b>106</b> are examples of potential bases for charging some type of enhanced display fee of the listing: (a) length of text (as measured in characters, words, sentences, or any other metric); (b) font size; (c) font type; (d) incorporation of graphics; (e) incorporation of color; (f) incorporation of animation; (g) an interactivity opportunity; (h) a detailed view; or (i) any other mechanism that calls more attention to the listing <b>104</b>. Some forms of enhanced display formats are mutually exclusive. For example, if text is written in the Arial <b>12</b> font, then that same text cannot be written in Times New Roman <b>14</b> font. An enhanced listing <b>104</b> can be enhanced with respect to more than one display-related attribute.

p-0305In some embodiments, the enhanced display fee <b>163</b> lowers the impact of the overall per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> on the priority metric <b>179</b>. For example, if the per-hit fee amount is $0.50, and the enhanced display fee is $0.30 per-hit, then the portion of the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> that is used to calculate the priority metric <b>179</b> is $0.20.

p-0306Listings <b>104</b> that are associated with enhanced display fees <b>163</b> and the corresponding enhanced display format can be referred to as “enhanced listings.” The system <b>100</b> can be configured in such a way as to transform a particular listing <b>104</b> into an enhanced listing in selective circumstances, typically depending on the type of request <b>132</b>. For example, the system <b>100</b> could be configured to enhance a listing <b>104</b> in the case of a nationwide search for consumer electronics stores, but not to enhance the listing <b>104</b> in the context of a search for local repair shop for electronic items. The various uses of the enhanced display fee <b>163</b> are discussed in greater detail below.

p-0307o. Reviews and/or Ratings

p-0308The ways in which review and/or rating information <b>171</b> impacts the ways in which listings <b>104</b> are prioritized by the system <b>100</b> are subject to considerable configuration by the administrator <b>160</b> of the system <b>100</b>. One limitation that can be imposed on the system <b>100</b> is a minimum number of reviews and/or ratings necessary to be included in a tier <b>169</b>. For example, the administrator <b>160</b> may determine that only listings <b>104</b> that have received a certain number of ratings should be included in a tier <b>169</b> because the number of reviews and/or ratings in review and/or rating information <b>171</b> may be an indicia of the quality of a listing <b>104</b>.

h-0018III. Category-Based Processing

p-0309A. Description of Category Hierarchy Diagrams

p-03101. Abstract Diagram of Category Levels

p-0311<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a category hierarchy <b>164</b> that is three-levels deep. Different embodiments of the system <b>100</b> can incorporate widely different category hierarchies <b>164</b> with different levels of depth. Some embodiments will include hierarchies that are only one level deep, while others may include hierarchies that are much deeper than three-levels deep. The proper design of the category hierarchy <b>164</b> is dependent upon the scope of the goods, services, and other offerings to be advertised on the system <b>100</b>.

p-0312At the top of the diagram is the aggregation of all categories <b>180</b>. At this level of abstraction, all products are part of the same meta-category and category attributes <b>110</b> do not possess any special status with respect to the processing of the system <b>100</b>. In such an embodiment, category attributes <b>110</b> are processed like any other “search term” functioning as a key word by a search engine. For example, the term “restaurant” would exist as a potential search term, but there would not be a subset of listings <b>104</b> categorized in terms of subject matter.

p-0313Below the meta-category <b>180</b> are the level <b>1</b> categories <b>182</b>. On a directory structure, level <b>1</b> categories <b>182</b> are the large categories. For example, “restaurants” might be an appropriate level <b>1</b> category <b>182</b>. Some embodiments of the system <b>100</b> may involve category “hierarchies” <b>164</b> that are only one level deep. Such “hierarchies” do not truly incorporate category hierarchical relationships, because no category is a sub-category of another. However, unlike the meta-category embodiment described above, a category hierarchy <b>182</b> that is one level deep does allow listings <b>104</b> to be organized into categories in a way that is superior to the use of search engine search terms. Category attributes <b>110</b> are more useful than a search term submitted to a search engine as a “key word” because the listings <b>104</b> are organized into categories <b>182</b> in a holistic manner, in contrast to the more superficial text searching invoked by a search engine.

p-0314Below level <b>1</b> categories <b>182</b> are two or more level <b>2</b> categories <b>184</b>. In some embodiments, a particular category may have only one sub-category. Each level <b>2</b> category is a sub-category of a level <b>1</b> category <b>182</b>, but each level <b>1</b> category <b>182</b> need not be associated with level <b>2</b> categories <b>184</b>. One example of a level <b>2</b> category <b>184</b> in relation to a level <b>1</b> category is the relationship between “Italian Restaurants” and “Restaurants” generally. Every Italian Restaurant is a Restaurant, but not all Restaurants are Italian Restaurants.

p-0315Below level <b>2</b> categories <b>184</b> are two or more level <b>3</b> categories. Each level <b>3</b> category <b>186</b> is a sub-category of a level <b>2</b> category <b>184</b>, but each level <b>2</b> category <b>184</b> need not be associated with level <b>3</b> categories <b>186</b>. One example of a level <b>3</b> category <b>186</b> in relation to a level <b>2</b> category is the relationship between “Italian Restaurants that offer pizza delivery” and “Italian Restaurants” generally. Every Italian Restaurant that offers pizza delivery is an Italian Restaurant, but not all Italian Restaurants offer pizza delivery.

p-0316The illustration in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a </i>is provided solely for the purpose of illustrating the concept of hierarchical relationships in the context of category attributes <b>110</b>. In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the actual category hierarchy <b>164</b> would be too large to fit on even many different sheets of paper.

p-03172. Category Hierarchy Populated with Examples

p-0318<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>b </i>is a category hierarchy diagram <b>164</b> illustrating a specific example of the types of categories that can be incorporated into the system <b>100</b>. Beneath the meta-category of all categories <b>180</b> are three level <b>1</b> categories <b>182</b>, including a Consumer Electronics category <b>182</b>.<b>02</b>, a Book Store category <b>182</b>.<b>04</b>, and a Restaurant category <b>182</b>.<b>06</b>.

p-0319The Consumer Electronics category <b>182</b>.<b>02</b> is made up of two sub-categories, a Stereo System category <b>184</b>.<b>02</b> and a Cameras category <b>184</b>.<b>04</b>. The Stereo System category <b>184</b>.<b>02</b> is not made up of any sub-categories, while the Cameras category <b>184</b>.<b>04</b> is made up of the sub-categories of Digital Cameras <b>186</b>.<b>02</b> and Video Cameras <b>186</b>.<b>04</b>. The Book Stores category <b>182</b>.<b>04</b> is an example of a level <b>1</b> category <b>182</b> that is not made up of any sub-categories. In a real world implementation of the system <b>100</b>, such an outcome may be indicative of a category hierarchy <b>164</b> in need of change in design. For example, a real world implementation of a level <b>1</b> category <b>182</b> without level <b>2</b> categories <b>184</b> may indicate that the level <b>1</b> category is to narrow, or conversely, that the level <b>1</b> category <b>182</b> should be associated with various sub-categories (e.g. level <b>2</b> categories <b>184</b>). However, for the purposes of illustration, it is important to note that different branches of the category hierarchy <b>164</b> are of different lengths, and themselves result in a different number of sub-branches. That diversity of structure can include level <b>1</b> categories <b>182</b> that are not associated with any sub-categories.

p-0320The level <b>1</b> category of Restaurants <b>182</b>.<b>06</b> is made up of three sub-categories in the Figure, a Fast Food category <b>184</b>.<b>06</b>, a Pizza category <b>184</b>.<b>08</b>, and a Chinese Restaurants category <b>184</b>.<b>10</b>.

p-0321B. How can the Category Hierarchy Impact Requests?

p-0322In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, a category selection <b>138</b> is part of the request <b>132</b> submitted by the user <b>130</b>. In a subset of those embodiments, the category selection <b>138</b> is made by the user <b>130</b> using a directory structure that represents the category hierarchy <b>164</b>. In such embodiments, the category selection <b>138</b> can be made without the typing in of any text by the user <b>130</b>. In other embodiments, the category selection <b>138</b> is entered as text that is then translated into the appropriate category in the category hierarchy <b>164</b>.

p-0323C. How can the Category Hierarchy Impact Results?

p-0324Listings <b>104</b> can be either included or excluded from the results on the basis of similarities between the category selection <b>138</b> and the category attributes <b>110</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b>. The degree to which those two variables overlap can be evaluated using the category hierarchy <b>164</b>. In many embodiments, the category hierarchy <b>164</b> has a substantial impact on how groups are defined by the system <b>100</b> with respect to the particular request <b>132</b>.

p-0325Distinctions within the category hierarchy <b>164</b> can be used to distinguish between category attributes <b>110</b> within the result. The more complex and developed the category hierarchy <b>164</b>, the finer the possible distinctions that can be made. For example, if the hierarchy <b>164</b> distinguishes between digital cameras and more traditional analog cameras, then requests <b>132</b> by users <b>130</b> can take advantage of the fact that the administrator <b>160</b> has organized the various camera listings <b>104</b> into listings for digital cameras and more traditional cameras. If a particular advertiser <b>102</b> has a surplus of one type of camera but not the other, that advertiser <b>102</b> has the opportunity to pay a greater fee relating to the applicable category in order to reduce the surplus inventory. If the system <b>100</b> possesses a less detailed category hierarchy <b>164</b>, or lacks a category hierarchy <b>164</b> altogether, the ability of the system <b>100</b> to focus the efforts of users <b>130</b> is impeded.

p-0326D. How can Category Hierarchy Impact the Response?

p-0327In many embodiments, there is no distinction between the results and the responses <b>144</b>. However, in certain embodiments, the response <b>144</b> is generated by modifying the result with the response heuristic <b>172</b>. In such embodiments, the response heuristic <b>172</b> performs the function of further filtering out listings <b>104</b> on the basis of the various listing attributes <b>106</b> associated with the listings <b>104</b>. In embodiments where there is a distinction between the result and the response <b>144</b>, the category hierarchy <b>164</b> can be utilized to generate the result as well as the response <b>144</b>.

p-0328In the same way that the category hierarchy <b>164</b> can impact which listings <b>104</b> result from the application of the request <b>132</b> to the database structure <b>126</b>, the category hierarchy can also play a part of “winnowing out” certain listings <b>104</b> from the response <b>144</b> that were tentatively included in the results. As discussed both above and below, distinctions in the category hierarchy <b>164</b> can be an important input for the dynamic identification of relevant groups from the group hierarchy <b>178</b> to be included in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0329Distinctions within the category hierarchy <b>164</b> can impact what groups from the group hierarchy <b>178</b> are included in the response <b>144</b>, which listings <b>104</b> are included in the response <b>144</b>, and how the various listings <b>104</b> are organized within the response <b>144</b>.

h-0019IV. Geography-Based Processing

p-0330A. Description of Geography Hierarchy Diagrams

p-03311. Abstract Diagram of Geography Levels

p-0332<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>a </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a geography hierarchy <b>166</b> that is three levels deep. Different embodiments of the system <b>100</b> can incorporate different geography hierarchies <b>166</b>. For example, the system <b>100</b> could be implemented on a world-wide basis that would include many different countries, or could be implemented with a more regional approach. Moreover, some embodiments will include hierarchies that are only one level deep, while others may include hierarchies that are much deeper than three-levels deep. The proper design of the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> is dependent upon the geographic scope the advertisers <b>102</b>.

p-0333At the top of the diagram is the aggregation of all geographies <b>190</b>. At this level of abstraction, all geographical regions are part of the same meta-geography region and geographical attributes <b>108</b> do possess any special status with respect to the processing of the system <b>100</b>. In such an embodiment, geographical attributes <b>110</b> are processed like any other search term functioning as a key word in a search engine.

p-0334Below the meta-geography <b>190</b> are the level <b>1</b> geographies <b>192</b>. In a geography directory embodiment, level <b>1</b> geographies <b>192</b> are the largest geographical regions. In embodiments involving worldwide communications over the Internet, level <b>1</b> geographies <b>192</b> may represent national boundaries.

p-0335Below level <b>1</b> geographies <b>192</b> are level <b>2</b> geographies <b>194</b>. Each level <b>2</b> geography is a sub-geography of a level <b>1</b> geography <b>194</b>, but each level <b>1</b> geography <b>192</b> need not be associated with level <b>2</b> geographies <b>194</b>. Below level <b>2</b> geographies <b>194</b> are level <b>3</b> geographies <b>196</b>. Each level <b>3</b> geography <b>196</b> is a sub-region of a level <b>2</b> geography <b>194</b>, but each level <b>2</b> geography <b>194</b> need not be associated with level <b>3</b> categories <b>196</b>.

p-0336In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, level <b>1</b> geographies <b>192</b> are associated with national boundaries, level <b>2</b> geographies <b>194</b> are associated with state or intra-national regional boundaries, and level <b>3</b> geographies <b>196</b> are associated with cities.

p-0337The illustration in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>a </i>is provided solely for the purpose of illustrating the concept of hierarchical relationships in the context of geography attributes <b>108</b>. In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the actual geography hierarchy <b>166</b> would be too wide to fit on even numerous different sheets of paper line up side by side.

p-0338In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> is pre-defined by the administrator <b>160</b> and subject to modification or enhancement from time to time by the administrator <b>160</b>. In some embodiments, users <b>130</b> can make certain geography selections <b>136</b> from a directory or menu of predefined option.

p-0339In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, different geographic regions within the geographic hierarchy <b>166</b> can overlap. Moreover, a second level geography <b>194</b> can be associated with more than one first level geography <b>192</b>. For example, some cities span across more than one county or even more than one state.

p-03402. Diagram of Specific Region Types

p-0341<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>b </i>is a geography hierarchy <b>166</b> diagram illustrating a geography hierarchy that includes national regions <b>192</b>.<b>02</b> as level <b>1</b> geography regions <b>192</b>, regional/state regions <b>194</b>.<b>02</b> as level <b>2</b> geography regions <b>194</b>, and local regions <b>196</b>.<b>02</b> as level <b>3</b> geography regions <b>196</b>. In some embodiments, local regions <b>196</b>.<b>02</b> are divided further by attributes such as 9 digit zip codes or some other geography attribute <b>108</b>. Such smaller regions can be referred to as zones.

p-03423. Service Areas

p-0343In addition to associating listings <b>104</b> with geographic regions indicating the scope of an advertiser's <b>102</b> activities, the system <b>100</b> can also include additional information as to various service areas within the broader geographic activities of advertisers <b>102</b>. Service area attributes can transform a two-dimensional geography hierarchy <b>166</b> into a three-dimensional geography hierarchy <b>166</b>. Service areas indicate that an advertiser <b>102</b> has a specific presence in one or more sub-regions of the geographic region associated with the advertiser <b>102</b>. For example, a national book store chain can be said to have service area in each location where there is a book store. In contrast, a nationwide book store that relies exclusively on Internet sales would not possess any service areas within the geographic regions of the advertiser <b>102</b>. A nationwide book store could also be considered to possess a “nationwide” service area that does not single out any smaller geographic regions.

p-0344<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>c </i>is a partial geography hierarchy <b>166</b> diagram illustrating various service areas that can be associated with a national level geographic region <b>192</b>.<b>02</b>. In some embodiments, a listing <b>104</b> associated with a national geography <b>192</b>.<b>02</b> can also be associated with specific metropolitan area service areas (NMetro) <b>200</b> or a state-wide service area (NState) <b>202</b>. For some listings <b>104</b>, there will be no desire on the part of the advertiser <b>102</b> to identify a subset of the geographic region as a service area, and such listings <b>104</b> can treat the entire national region as a national service area (N) <b>204</b>. Advertisers <b>102</b> that exist exclusively or substantially through an online presence are more likely to pursue a national service area (N) <b>204</b> approach than more traditional brick-and-mortar businesses that augment their businesses through online sales. Service areas are an additional input to be taken into consideration by the response heuristic <b>172</b> and the placement heuristic <b>174</b>.

p-0345<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>d </i>is a partial geography hierarchy <b>166</b> diagram illustrating various service areas that can be associated with a regional/state geographic region <b>194</b>.<b>02</b>. A regional/state level geography <b>194</b>.<b>02</b> can include a city service area (RCity or SCity) <b>205</b>, a county service area (RCounty or SCounty) <b>206</b>, or state-wide service area (R or S) <b>206</b><i>a. </i>

p-0346<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>e </i>is a partial geography hierarchy <b>166</b> diagram illustrating various service areas that can be associated with a local geographic region <b>196</b>.<b>02</b>. A local geography <b>196</b>.<b>02</b> can include a city service level (LCity) <b>207</b> or a county service level (LCounty) <b>208</b>.

p-0347B. How can the Geography Hierarchy impact Requests?

p-0348In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, a geography selection <b>136</b> is part of the request <b>132</b> submitted by the user <b>130</b>. In a subset of those embodiments, the geography selection <b>136</b> is made by the user <b>130</b> using a directory structure that represents the geography hierarchy <b>166</b>. In such embodiments, a portion of the geography selection <b>136</b> can be made without the typing in of any text by the user <b>130</b>. In other embodiments, the geography selection <b>136</b> is entered as text.

p-0349C. How can the Geography Hierarchy Impact Results?

p-0350Listings <b>104</b> can be either included or excluded from the results on the basis of similarities between the geography selection <b>136</b> and the geography attributes <b>110</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b>. The degree to which those two variables overlap can be evaluated using the geography hierarchy <b>166</b>. In many embodiments, the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> has a substantial impact on how groups are defined by the system <b>100</b> with respect to the particular request <b>132</b>.

p-0351Distinctions within the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can be used to distinguish between geography attributes <b>108</b> within the result. The more complex and developed the geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, the finer the possible distinctions that can be made.

p-0352D. How can Geography Hierarchy impact the Response?

p-0353In many embodiments, there is no distinction between the results and the responses <b>144</b>. However, in certain embodiments, the response <b>144</b> is generated by modifying the result with the response heuristic <b>172</b>. In such embodiments, the response heuristic <b>172</b> performs the function of further filtering out listings <b>104</b> on the basis of the various listing attributes <b>106</b> associated with the listings <b>104</b>. In embodiments where there is a distinction between the result and the response <b>144</b>, the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can be utilized to generate the result as well as the response <b>144</b>.

p-0354In the same way that the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can impact which listings <b>104</b> result from the application of the request <b>132</b> to the database structure <b>126</b>, the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can also play a part of “winnowing out” certain listings <b>104</b> from the response that were tentatively included in the results. As discussed both above and below, distinctions in the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can be an important input for the dynamic identification of relevant groups from the group hierarchy <b>178</b> to be included in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0355Distinctions within the geography hierarchy <b>166</b> can impact what groups from the group hierarchy <b>178</b> are included in the response <b>144</b>, which listings <b>104</b> are included in the response <b>144</b>, and how the various listings <b>104</b> are organized within the response <b>144</b>.

h-0020V. Fee Type-Based Processing

p-0356A. Description of Fee Type Hierarchy

p-0357<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a fee type hierarchy (or simply “fee hierarchy” or “type hierarchy”) <b>168</b>. Different listings <b>104</b> within the same response <b>144</b> can be associated with a wide variety of different compensation arrangements or fee types.

p-0358Two high level fee types are fixed fee types <b>211</b> and per-hit fee types <b>212</b>. Fixed fee listings <b>104</b> do not involve a per transaction charge of the advertiser <b>102</b>. In contrast, a per-hit fee listing <b>212</b> does involve a transaction-based compensation approach. A hybrid fee type <b>213</b> includes listings <b>104</b> that include both a fixed fee amount <b>111</b> and a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> that exceeds $0.00. The per-hit fee type <b>212</b> includes listings <b>104</b> that include a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> that exceeds $0.00 and a fixed fee amount <b>111</b> of $0.00. The fixed-fee type <b>211</b> includes listings <b>104</b> that include a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> of $0.00 and a fixed fee amount <b>111</b> that exceeds $0.00. In some embodiments, a no charge listing <b>104</b> does not include a fixed fee amount <b>111</b> or a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>, while in other embodiments, a no charge listing <b>104</b> is associated with a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> of $0.00 and/or a fixed fee amount <b>111</b> of $0.00.

p-03591. Per-Hit Fee Types

p-0360There are different potential derivations of per-hit fee types <b>212</b>. In many embodiments, the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> that is charged by the administrator <b>160</b> is constant, regardless of the time of day, date, or other contextual information. Such a per-hit fee type <b>212</b> can be referred to as a single per-hit fee type <b>214</b>. In contrast, a contingent per-hit fee type <b>216</b> provides for automated adjustments to the per-hit fee <b>113</b> charged by the administrator. For example, a florist might be willing to pay more for a “hit” in the morning than they would during the evening hours. Special consideration can be given to holidays, special sales, and other potentially industry-specific or even business-specific practices.

p-03612. Fixed Fee Types

p-0362There are also several different variations of fixed fee types <b>211</b>. Fixed fees amounts <b>111</b> can be “fixed” on an annual basis (an annual fixed fee type <b>220</b>), a monthly basis (a monthly fixed fee type <b>222</b>), a weekly basis (a weekly fixed fee type <b>224</b>), or on a less regular basis (a special fixed fee type <b>226</b>). The special fixed fee type <b>226</b> can be limited to particular holidays or shopping periods, such as the Christmas holiday shopping season, the week before days such as Valentines Day, Mothers Day, Fathers Day, etc.

p-0363B. How does a Fee Type impact a Request?

p-0364None of the fee types <b>112</b> in the fee hierarchy <b>168</b> impacts the requests <b>132</b> sent by users <b>130</b> to the system <b>100</b>. In many embodiments, the fee types <b>112</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b> are not viewable by the user <b>130</b> or other advertisers <b>102</b>. In alternative embodiments, other advertisers <b>102</b> can obtain information about fee types <b>112</b>, and in some alternative embodiments, even users <b>130</b> can access compensation information relating to the listings <b>104</b> in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0365As a general matter, the fee charged by the administrator <b>160</b> is a matter between the administrator <b>160</b> and the advertiser <b>102</b> and is thus of questionable importance or even interest to users <b>130</b>. However, fee types <b>112</b> and fee type hierarchy <b>168</b> do impact the groups contained in the response <b>144</b>, and thus fee types <b>112</b> can be as important to the result heuristic <b>170</b>, the response heuristic <b>172</b>, and the placement heuristic <b>174</b> as geography attributes <b>108</b>, category attributes <b>110</b>, or any other type of attribute.

p-0366C. How does a Fee Type Impact the Result?

p-0367Fee types <b>112</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b> in the database structure <b>126</b> impact the groups that are included in the result generated from the request <b>132</b> submitted by users <b>130</b>. Unlike attributes such as category attributes <b>110</b> and geography attributes <b>108</b>, the impact of fee type <b>112</b> is set primarily by the administrator <b>160</b>. Users have little cognizance, much less influence, over the impact of fee types <b>112</b>.

p-0368D. How does a Fee Type Impact the Response?

p-0369By influencing the groups of listings <b>104</b> that are included in the response <b>144</b>, the fee type <b>112</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b> in the database structure <b>126</b> can determine which groups of listings will be included in the response <b>144</b> generated from the request <b>132</b> submitted by users <b>130</b>. As already noted with respect to Section C, users have little cognizance, much less influence, over the impact of fee types <b>112</b>, as contrasted with attributes such as category attributes <b>110</b> and geography attributes <b>108</b>.

h-0021VI. Processing Based on Review/Rating Information

p-0370A. Description of Review/Rating Information

p-0371As noted above, in some embodiments review and/or rating information <b>171</b> comprises a number on a numerical scale indicative of feedback that users <b>130</b> have provided with respect to an advertiser <b>102</b> and/or listing <b>104</b>. Generally, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is an average “score” or rating that users <b>130</b> have provided with respect to an advertiser <b>102</b> and/or listing <b>104</b>. However, review and/or rating information could be calculated in other ways known to those skilled in the art and would not depart from the scope of the present invention so long as it represented feedback of users <b>130</b> with respect to an advertiser <b>102</b> and/or listing <b>104</b>. Further, in some embodiments, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> could comprise textual descriptions or summaries of an advertiser <b>102</b> and/or listing <b>104</b>. These embodiments would enable textual information to be included in review and/or rating selection <b>139</b>, such as “good”, “excellent”, “inexpensive”, etc.

p-0372As noted above, in some embodiments, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> may include rating tiers <b>173</b>. Rating tiers <b>173</b> compensate for the differences in quality found between review and/or rating information <b>171</b> that comes from difference sources by assigning weights to review and/or rating information <b>171</b> based on its source. For example, an embodiment might use review and/or rating information <b>171</b> whose source was an independent industry recognized ratings service, as well as review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> whose source was ratings published in a consumer magazine. In this embodiment, the industry recognized rating service might be deemed more reliable than the consumer magazine. Therefore, it would be desirable to give more weight to review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> from the independent industry recognized ratings service than to review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> from the consumer magazine. Accordingly, in this embodiment, review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> from these two sources would be assigned to different rating tiers <b>173</b> such that the review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> from the independent industry recognized ratings service would be given greater weight than the review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> from the consumer magazine.

p-0373<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 39</figref> depicts ratings tiers <b>173</b> in an embodiment utilizing four tiers <b>390</b>, <b>392</b>, <b>394</b>, and <b>396</b>. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 39</figref> is exemplary, and not restrictive. It should be understood that some embodiments do not use rating tiers <b>173</b>, and further that different embodiments will use different numbers of ratings tiers <b>173</b>. Referring to <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 39</figref>, tier <b>390</b> is the top tier, and assigned the highest weight. Tiers <b>392</b>, <b>394</b>, and <b>396</b> follow in descending order. The next two paragraphs describe exemplary embodiments utilizing ratings tiers <b>173</b>.

p-0374In one embodiment, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> from an independent industry recognized ratings service is assigned to tier <b>390</b>, which is given a weight of 1.25. Review and/or rating information <b>171</b> from a consumer magazine is assigned to tier <b>392</b>, and given a weight of 1. Review and/or rating information <b>171</b> from online user communities is assigned to tier <b>394</b>, and given a weight of 0.75. Review and/or rating information <b>171</b> from individual users is assigned to tier <b>396</b> and given a weight of 0.5.

p-0375In other embodiments, ratings tiers <b>173</b> are based on the number and consistency of the ratings included in review and/or ratings information <b>171</b>. For example, in one such embodiment, tier <b>390</b> represents listings <b>104</b> for which review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> includes a number of ratings above a certain threshold (for example, tier <b>390</b> might require review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> to include one-hundred ratings), where there is a standard deviation of no more than one rating increment. Tier <b>392</b> might then require a slightly lower threshold number of ratings to be included in review and/or ratings information <b>171</b>, and might permit a standard deviation of up to two ratings increments. Tier <b>394</b> would require an even lower threshold number of ratings to be included in review and/or ratings information <b>171</b>, and would permit a standard deviation of up to two ratings increments, and so on.

p-0376Means by which feedback such as review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is collected are well known in the art. For example, in some embodiments, feedback including review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is collected via an HTML form, although other means of collecting review and/or rating information <b>171</b> will be known to those skilled in the art.

p-0377B. How can the Review/Rating Information Impact Requests?

p-0378In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, a review and/or rating selection <b>139</b> is part of the request <b>132</b> submitted by the user <b>130</b>. As noted above, a review and/or rating selection <b>139</b> is in many embodiments a number representing a numerical rating or in some embodiments may be a textual search term indicating the interest of a user <b>130</b> in seeing listings <b>104</b> associated with reviews containing the search term. Further, in many cases a request includes multiple review and/or rating selections <b>139</b>, allowing a user <b>130</b> to tailor a request according to the specific review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b> that user <b>130</b> is interested in. Further, as noted above, in some embodiments, user <b>130</b> can attach weights to different review and/or rating selections <b>139</b> associated with various review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b>.

p-0379C. How can the Review/Rating Information Impact Results?

p-0380Listings <b>104</b> can be either included or excluded from the results depending on whether review and/or rating information <b>171</b> associated with a listing <b>104</b> meets criteria specified in administrative rules <b>122</b>. For example, result heuristic <b>170</b> may specify that a listing <b>104</b> be included in the results only if review and/or rating information <b>171</b> indicates that a rating above a certain threshold is associated with the listing <b>104</b>. Further, result heuristic <b>170</b> may specify that review and/or rating information <b>171</b> be used only if based on a certain number of ratings and/or reviews supplied by users <b>130</b>. Those skilled in the art will recognize that review and/or rating information <b>171</b> supplied by a minimal number of users <b>130</b> is likely to have less value as a rating of a review and/or rating attribute <b>109</b> associated with a listing <b>104</b>. Time may also be a factor, with older reviews and/or rating information <b>171</b> being given less weight than newer ones. In some embodiments, reviews and/or rating information <b>171</b> can expire at some point.

p-0381As suggested above, result heuristic <b>170</b> may be based on review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> associated with multiple review and/or ratings attributes <b>109</b>, where different review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> associated for different review and/or ratings attributes <b>109</b> may or may not be accorded different weights. As noted above, user <b>130</b> may make review and/or ratings selections <b>139</b> that are associated with different review and/or ratings attributes <b>109</b>, and moreover these different review and/or ratings attributes <b>109</b> may be given weights provided by user <b>130</b>. Moreover, in some embodiments, weights associated with review and/or ratings attributes <b>109</b> may or may not be provided by input from users <b>130</b>, but are included in results heuristic <b>170</b>. For example, as discussed above, ratings tiers <b>173</b> include weights not provided by input from users <b>130</b> that are included in results heuristic <b>170</b> in some embodiments.

p-0382D. How can Review/Rating Information Impact the Response?

p-0383In many embodiments, as noted above, there is no distinction between the results and the responses <b>144</b>. However, as noted above, in certain embodiments the response <b>144</b> is generated by modifying the result with the response heuristic <b>172</b>. In such embodiments, the response heuristic <b>172</b> performs the function of further filtering out listings <b>104</b> on the basis of the various listing attributes <b>106</b> associated with the listings <b>104</b>. In embodiments where there is a distinction between the result and the response <b>144</b>, the review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can be utilized to generate the result as well as the response <b>144</b>.

p-0384In the same way that review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can impact which listings <b>104</b> result from the application of the request <b>132</b> to the database structure <b>126</b>, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can also play a part of “winnowing out” certain listings <b>104</b> from the response that were tentatively included in the results. One way in which this “winnowing out” can be accomplished is by excluding listings <b>104</b> from the response <b>144</b> that are associated with ratings and/or review information <b>171</b> containing a rating or ratings falling below a certain threshold. Another way in which this “winnowing out” can be accomplished is by excluding listings <b>104</b> from the response <b>144</b> that are associated with ratings and/or review information <b>171</b> assigned to a certain ratings tiers or tiers <b>173</b>. As discussed both above and below, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can be an important input for the dynamic identification of relevant groups from the group hierarchy <b>178</b> to be included in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0385Review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can impact what groups from the group hierarchy <b>178</b> are included in the response <b>144</b>, which listings <b>104</b> are included in the response <b>144</b>, and how the various listings <b>104</b> are organized within the response <b>144</b>.

h-0022VII. Group-Based Processing

p-0386A. Inputs for Group Determinations

p-0387<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>a </i>is a relationship diagram illustrating one example of how attributes associated with a group hierarchy <b>178</b> are a function of attributes associated with the category hierarchy <b>164</b>, the geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, the fee hierarchy <b>168</b>, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> and any other hierarchy or collection of attributes used by the system <b>100</b> to focus on the desires and interests of users <b>130</b>, advertisers <b>102</b>, and administrators <b>160</b>.

p-0388In a fully normalized embodiment of the group hierarchy <b>178</b>, each distinction within one of the input data hierarchies or collections results in a corresponding distinction within the group hierarchy <b>178</b>. For example, one group of listings <b>104</b> could be limited to listings <b>104</b> for antique furniture (a category-based distinction) within the city of Topeka, Kans. (a geography-based distinction) with a special fixed fee arrangement (a fee-based distinction) for the week before the 4^thof July, where the listing <b>104</b> had received a rating of at least four stars out of five (a review/rating distinction). In alternative embodiments, the group hierarchy <b>178</b> can be configured to be less “sensitive” to distinctions within the other data hierarchies. Further, in embodiments supporting multiple review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b>, the group hierarchy <b>178</b> can be configured to be sensitive only to review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> based on particular review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b> or to weights assigned to various review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b>.

p-0389B. Group Hierarchy Diagram

p-0390<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>b </i>is a hierarchy diagram illustrating one example of a group hierarchy <b>178</b>. As discussed above, the group hierarchy <b>178</b> can incorporate all of the branches and distinctions included in the other data hierarchies. Thus, the illustration in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>b </i>is highly simplified

p-0391At the top of the group hierarchy <b>178</b> is a meta-group that includes all groups <b>230</b>. Below the meta-group are more specific groups <b>230</b> that are made up of various sub-groups. The hierarchical structure of the group hierarchy <b>178</b> will mirror the distinctions of the other data hierarchies in a fully normalized embodiment of the system <b>100</b>. The particular “level” of group <b>232</b> included in a response will be impacted by the administrative rules <b>122</b>, the request <b>132</b> provided by the user <b>130</b>, and the listing attributes <b>106</b> associated with the listing records <b>128</b> in the database structure <b>126</b>.

p-0392As illustrated in the diagram, different groups <b>232</b> will have a different number of listings <b>104</b> that are associated with the particular group <b>232</b>.

p-0393C. Detailed Input Diagram for Group Processing

p-0394<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>c </i>is an input/output diagram illustrating an example of request attributes <b>134</b>, listing attributes <b>106</b>, and administrative rules <b>122</b> being used to define the groups <b>232</b> to identify the listings included in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0395The request attributes <b>134</b> inputted to the group determination process can include one or more geography selections <b>136</b>, one or more category selections <b>138</b>, one or more review/rating selections <b>139</b>, and any other attribute types relating to the request <b>132</b>.

p-0396The listing attributes <b>106</b> inputted to the group determination process can include one or more geography attributes <b>108</b>, fee type attributes <b>112</b>, category attributes <b>110</b>, review/rating attributes <b>109</b>, and any other attributes relating to listings <b>104</b> or the advertiser <b>102</b>.

p-0397The administrative rules <b>122</b> define the possible branches and distinctions defined in the group hierarchy <b>178</b>. Although a single listing <b>104</b> can potentially belong to several groups <b>232</b>, that same single listing <b>104</b> should not be associated with more than one group <b>232</b> within a particular response <b>144</b>. The administrative rules <b>122</b> can be configured to prevent such an occurrence in order to prevent a response <b>144</b> from including duplicative listings <b>104</b> (e.g. the same listing <b>104</b> appearing more than once).

p-0398All of those inputs influence the determination of what groups <b>232</b> are included in a response <b>144</b>, and what listings <b>104</b> are included in those groups <b>232</b>.

p-0399D. Specific Example of a Group Determination

p-0400<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>d </i>is a process flow diagram illustrating the submission of a request <b>132</b> to a database structure <b>126</b>, and inclusion of various listings in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0401The specific request attributes <b>134</b> of a barbershop category selection <b>138</b>, a small town USA geography selection <b>136</b>, and a review/rating selection <b>139</b> for listings <b>104</b> rated higher than seven on a ten point scale are presented to the system <b>100</b> in order to provide a meaningful response <b>144</b> to the submitting user <b>130</b>.

p-0402The database structure <b>126</b> includes various listing records <b>128</b> associated with listing attributes <b>106</b> that include various category attributes <b>110</b>, fee type attributes <b>112</b>, geography attributes <b>108</b>, and review/rating attributes <b>109</b>. Some of the listing records <b>128</b> in the database structure <b>126</b> relate to barbershops and some of the listing records <b>128</b> relate to the geography of Small Town U.S.A. A smaller group of listing records <b>128</b> will relate to both barbershops and Small Town U.S.A. Further, some of the listing records <b>128</b> in database structure <b>126</b> will relate to reviews and/or ratings that are based on feedback received from users <b>130</b>. The administrative rules <b>122</b> define what constitute matches of the request attributes <b>134</b> and the listing attributes <b>106</b>. For example, the administrative rules <b>122</b> may provide that a request for a more specific category or geography will include a broader category of geography if a narrower match does not exist. Similarly, the administrative rules <b>122</b> can determine whether a more general category or geography automatically includes a narrower category or geography. Further, the administrative rules <b>122</b> can determine whether a rating is higher or lower than a threshold rating specified by a review/rating selection <b>139</b>. In some embodiments, even if request attributes <b>134</b> does not include a review/rating selection <b>139</b>, administrative rules <b>122</b> may specify a threshold rating supplied by an administrator <b>160</b>.

p-0403The configuration of the group hierarchy <b>178</b> by the category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, fee type hierarchy <b>168</b>, and review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is discussed above. Thus, the administrative rules <b>122</b> define the realm of potential groups <b>232</b>, while the request attributes <b>134</b> and listing attributes <b>106</b> determine which listings <b>104</b> are to be included in the response <b>144</b>.

p-0404The end result is the response <b>144</b> on the bottom left portion of <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>d</i>. In this example, there are two groups <b>232</b> of listings <b>104</b>, one group <b>232</b> made up of fixed fee listings <b>104</b> for Small Town, USA barbershops and a second group <b>232</b> made up of per-hit listings <b>104</b> for Small Town, USA barbershops. It is also possible, for instance, to have a third group <b>232</b> made up of a hybrid fee type <b>213</b>. Different examples of group selection in accordance with the administrative rules <b>122</b> are illustrated in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 13-19</figref> and are discussed below.

h-0023VII. Subsystem-Level Views

p-0405A. Function-Based Subsystem Components

p-0406<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>a </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes a request subsystem <b>300</b> and a response subsystem <b>302</b>.

p-04071. Request Subsystem

p-0408A request subsystem <b>300</b> is utilized by users <b>130</b> to create requests <b>132</b> and to submit requests <b>132</b> to the system <b>100</b>. Requests <b>132</b> can include a variety of different request attributes <b>134</b>, including various geography selections <b>136</b>, category selections <b>138</b>, and/or review/rating selections <b>139</b>. The number and types of attributes included as request attributes <b>134</b> with respect to a particular request <b>134</b>, can vary widely from embodiment to embodiment, or even from request <b>132</b> to request <b>132</b> within a particular embodiment.

p-0409In some embodiments, one or more of the request attributes <b>134</b> can be “blank” or “null” values. In other embodiments, request attributes <b>134</b> can include multiple geography selections <b>136</b> and multiple category selections <b>138</b>. Requests <b>132</b> and request-related processing by the system <b>100</b> is described both above and below.

p-04102. Response Subsystem

p-0411A response subsystem <b>302</b> is used to generate responses <b>144</b> to the requests <b>132</b> from the request subsystem <b>300</b>. The response subsystem <b>302</b> populates the response <b>144</b> with selectively identified listings <b>104</b> from the database structure <b>126</b> that includes the listings <b>104</b> stored by the system <b>100</b>. A variety of heuristics can be used to identify the appropriate listings <b>104</b>, and to format, order, or otherwise organize the listings <b>104</b> within the response <b>144</b>.

p-0412The response subsystem <b>302</b> can generate responses <b>144</b> from requests <b>132</b> using a variety of different response heuristics <b>172</b>. Response heuristics <b>172</b> can determine the content and format of the response <b>144</b>. To order or place the various listings <b>104</b> within the response <b>144</b>, the response heuristic <b>172</b> can invoke the placement heuristic <b>174</b>. In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, each listing <b>104</b> is associated with a fee type <b>112</b>. Even unpaid listings (e.g. free listings) <b>104</b> can be associated with a per-hit fee <b>113</b> of $0.00 per-hit. In a typical embodiment, the various listings <b>104</b> are associated with one of two fee types <b>112</b>, a per-hit fee type <b>212</b> and a fixed fee type <b>211</b>. Listings associated with either fee type <b>112</b> can still be associated with both a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> and a fixed fee amount <b>111</b>, although one of those fee amounts will typically be $0.00. The number and types of attributes associated with the various listings <b>104</b> can vary widely from embodiment to embodiment, and even from listing <b>104</b> to listing <b>104</b> with a particular embodiment.

p-0413To promote highly “focused” responses, the response subsystem <b>100</b> can utilize various types of group-based processing, such as the group hierarchy <b>178</b> discussed above. In many embodiments, a single response <b>144</b> will typically include multiple groups <b>232</b> of listings <b>104</b>. The groups <b>232</b> included in the response <b>144</b> are determined by the combination of request attributes <b>134</b>, listing attributes <b>106</b>, and administrative rules <b>122</b>. In a highly focused embodiment, the system <b>100</b> can eliminate all listings <b>104</b> from the response <b>144</b> that do not fully match with the request attributes <b>134</b> included in the request <b>132</b>.

p-0414Different embodiments of the system <b>100</b> can utilize different combinations of inputs for group-based processing. For example, some embodiments of the system <b>100</b> will not include the category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, review and/or rating information <b>171</b>, and/or fee type hierarchy <b>168</b>. However, a fully normalized embodiment of the system <b>100</b> maximizes the “sensitivity” of the system <b>100</b> to the needs and desires of users <b>130</b>. In a fully normalized embodiment, all of the listings <b>104</b> associated with the group <b>232</b> share category, geography, review/rating, and fee type attributes to a highly focused degree.

p-0415As discussed above, groups <b>232</b> are defined by listing attributes <b>106</b> shared in common by the various listings <b>104</b>. For example, the group <b>232</b> consisting of national advertisers regardless of category, rating, or fee type is likely to be very large, while the group <b>232</b> of antique dealers purchasing per-hit listings and specializing exclusively in 16^thcentury antiques in Small Town, U.S.A. with the highest possible rating is likely to be quite small. The system <b>100</b> performs a “focusing” function by defining the appropriate group <b>232</b> identities for the particular request <b>132</b>. The “focusing” function is configured by the administrative rules <b>122</b>. The administrative rules <b>122</b> can be configured to be more or less “sensitive” in particular contexts. For example, if there are only a few medical specialists within the state that can perform a particular type of procedure, the administrative rules might be configured to include a broader geography than the geography selection <b>136</b> specified within the request <b>132</b>. Similarly, a request <b>132</b> that included a highly specific sub-category selection <b>138</b> could be generalized to a broader category if no listings <b>104</b> qualified for the more narrow scope. Expansion of scope can also work in the other direction, with a more general attribute at a higher level in the data hierarchy capturing more specialized attributes that are lower in the data hierarchy. These different nuances can be customized by the administrator on an attribute by attribute basis if desirable.

p-0416In some embodiments, the priority metric <b>179</b> is only used for intra-group comparisons, and thus values in common with other group listings <b>104</b> can be ignored in calculating the priority metric <b>179</b>. For example, a group <b>232</b> sharing a specific category attribute <b>110</b>, a specific geography attribute <b>108</b>, and a specific review/rating attribute <b>109</b> will not be distinguished from each other on the basis of those attributes. In such an embodiment, different groups <b>232</b> can have pre-defined “spots” within the response <b>144</b> that the listings <b>104</b> within those applicable groups <b>232</b> compete for in accordance with the administrative rules <b>122</b>. Embodiments where the priority metric <b>179</b> is limited to intra-group competition can be referred to as intra-group competitive embodiments.

p-0417In other embodiments, groups <b>232</b> are not allocated pre-defined spots, and the priority metric <b>179</b> is used to compare listings <b>104</b> belong to different groups <b>232</b>. Such embodiments can be referred to as inter-group competitive embodiments.

p-0418Although listings <b>104</b> are typically selected for inclusion within a particular response <b>144</b> on the basis of group affiliation, listings <b>104</b> need not be displayed in a manner that is sorted by group <b>232</b>. To the contrary, it can be beneficial to purposely “break up” listing sequences that would otherwise include solely one group of listings <b>104</b>. Thus, a listing <b>104</b> associated with one group <b>232</b> could be adjacent to two or more listings <b>104</b> not associated with the same group <b>232</b>. For example, it may be desirable to include a single fixed fee listing <b>104</b> between two or more per-hit fee listings <b>104</b>. Responses <b>144</b> and response-related processing is discussed both above and below. Detailed examples of various potential arrangements are discussed below.

p-04193. Result Subsystem

p-0420<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>b </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes a request subsystem <b>300</b>, a result subsystem <b>304</b>, and a response subsystem <b>302</b>. In embodiments of the system <b>100</b> that include the result subsystem <b>304</b>, the result subsystem <b>304</b> generates a result from the request <b>132</b> captured by the request subsystem <b>300</b>, and the response subsystem <b>302</b> generates the response <b>144</b> from the result provided by the result subsystem <b>304</b>.

p-0421As discussed above, the system <b>100</b> can be configured to distinguish between the result generated from the request <b>132</b> and the response <b>144</b> provided to the user <b>130</b> in light of the result. The response <b>144</b> can be subject to additional “winnowing out” of listings <b>104</b> that are included in the result generated by the result subsystem <b>304</b>. In other words, listings <b>104</b> included in the result may not necessarily end up in the response <b>144</b> if the response heuristic <b>172</b> determines that the “match” is not focused enough, or for any other reason, as configured by the administrative rules <b>122</b>.

p-0422In another embodiment where the result subsystem <b>304</b> generates the result from the request <b>132</b>, and the response subsystem <b>302</b> generates the response <b>144</b> from the result, the result heuristic <b>170</b> can include potentially any process for selectively identifying relevant matches and the result heuristic <b>170</b> is discussed above.

p-04234. Administrative Subsystem

p-0424<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>c </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes a request subsystem <b>300</b>, a result subsystem <b>302</b>, a response subsystem <b>304</b>, and an administrative subsystem <b>306</b>.

p-0425The administrative subsystem <b>306</b> is the means by which administrative rules <b>122</b> are created, configured, updated, and deleted within the system <b>100</b>. Thus, the administrative subsystem <b>306</b> impacts the functioning of the other subsystems because the administrative rules <b>122</b> define how the request subsystem <b>300</b> captures requests <b>132</b>, how the result subsystem <b>304</b> generates results from requests <b>132</b>, and how the response subsystem <b>302</b> generates responses <b>144</b> from results.

p-0426The administrative rules <b>122</b> are discussed both above and below.

p-0427B. Entity-Based Subsystem Components

p-0428<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref><i>a </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes a user subsystem <b>310</b> and a sponsor subsystem <b>312</b>. The user subsystem <b>310</b> interacts with the sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> in the way that the system <b>100</b> allows users <b>130</b> to interact with advertisers <b>102</b> and their corresponding listings <b>104</b>.

p-04291. User Subsystem

p-0430A user subsystem <b>310</b> can be used by users <b>130</b> to submit requests <b>132</b> and receive responses <b>144</b>. The user subsystem <b>310</b> includes the user interface <b>142</b>. The user subsystem <b>310</b> is the means by which users <b>130</b> interact with the system <b>100</b> and the listings <b>104</b> submitted by the advertisers <b>102</b>. The user subsystem <b>310</b> can configure the ways in which request attributes <b>134</b> are captured and transmitted to the system <b>100</b>. The user subsystem <b>310</b> can include functionality such as user profiles, user history, and the ability to save requests <b>132</b>. The user subsystem <b>310</b> allows the user <b>130</b> to focus their efforts at information retrieval.

p-0431In some embodiments, as mentioned above, user profiles are created based on the requests <b>132</b> that the user <b>130</b> has previously submitted. In other embodiments, a user <b>130</b> is given the option of creating, or at least supplying some of the information for, a user profile. In certain of these embodiments, users <b>130</b> can indicate a sort order for listings <b>104</b> in responses <b>144</b>. In particular, users <b>130</b> may be allowed to specify an order of importance to be given to category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, and review and/or ratings information <b>171</b>. As mentioned above criteria related to each of category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, and review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> can cause a listing <b>104</b> to be excluded from a response <b>144</b>. In some embodiments, a user <b>130</b> can further refine the weight given to each of category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, and review and/or ratings information <b>171</b> in formulating a response <b>144</b> by creating a user profile. In these embodiments, listings <b>104</b> might be sorted according to weights given in a user profile to each of category hierarchy <b>164</b>, geography hierarchy <b>166</b>, and review and/or ratings information <b>171</b>. For example, a user might rank review/and/or ratings information <b>171</b> as the most important criteria, in which case a listing <b>104</b> with a high rating, but geographically far from a user <b>130</b> might be listed ahead of a listing <b>104</b> with a very low rating but in the same zip code as the user <b>130</b>.

p-0432The ability of users <b>130</b> to create, submit, and supplement requests <b>132</b>, as well as the ability of users <b>130</b> to interact with responses <b>144</b> to requests, is discussed both above and below.

p-04332. Sponsor Subsystem

p-0434A sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> can be used by advertisers <b>102</b> to submit listings <b>104</b> to the system <b>100</b>, to modify those listings <b>104</b>, and to access various reports provided by the system <b>100</b>. The sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> includes the advertiser interface <b>116</b>. The sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> is the means by which advertisers <b>102</b> interact with the system <b>100</b> and the requests <b>132</b> submitted by the users <b>130</b>. The sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> can configure the ways in which listing attributes <b>106</b> are captured and transmitted to the system <b>100</b>. The sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> can include any type of input that can impact the priority metric <b>179</b> for a particular listing <b>179</b>. The sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> allows the advertiser <b>102</b> to focus their efforts at disseminating information to users <b>130</b> who are most likely to be interested in doing business with the advertiser <b>102</b>.

p-04353. Administrator Subsystem

p-0436<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref><i>b </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes a user subsystem <b>310</b>, a sponsor subsystem <b>312</b>, and an administrator subsystem <b>314</b>.

p-0437The administrator subsystem <b>314</b> is the mechanism by which the administrator <b>160</b> interacts with the system <b>100</b>, providing the mechanism for creating, updating, and deleting of administrative rules <b>122</b>. The administrator subsystem <b>314</b> includes the administrator interface <b>162</b>. The administrative subsystem <b>314</b> is the means by which administrative rules <b>122</b> are created, configured, updated, and deleted within the system <b>100</b>. Thus, the administrative subsystem <b>314</b> impacts the functioning of the other subsystems because the administrative rules <b>122</b> define how the user subsystem <b>310</b> interacts with users <b>130</b> and how the sponsor subsystem <b>312</b> interacts with advertisers <b>102</b>.

p-0438The types of administrative rules <b>122</b>, and their impact upon the processing performed by the system <b>100</b> is discussed both above and below.

p-0439C. Component-Based Subsystem Components

p-0440<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref><i>a </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes an interface subsystem <b>316</b> and a listing subsystem <b>318</b>. The interface subsystem <b>316</b> interacts with the listing subsystem <b>318</b> through the activities of users <b>130</b>, advertisers <b>102</b>, and administrators <b>160</b>.

p-04411. Interface Subsystem

p-0442An interface subsystem <b>316</b> is what allows users <b>130</b>, advertisers <b>102</b>, and administrators <b>160</b> to interact with the system <b>100</b>. The interface subsystem <b>316</b> includes the various interfaces, including the user interface <b>142</b>, the advertiser interface <b>116</b>, and the administrator interface <b>162</b>. In many embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, all interactions through the interface subsystem <b>316</b> are constrained by the limitations set forth in the administrative rules <b>122</b>. The different interfaces of the interface subsystem <b>316</b> can transmit and receive information from the system <b>100</b> in a simultaneous or substantially simultaneous manner. The interface subsystem <b>316</b> can be configured to allow advertisers <b>102</b> to submit listings <b>104</b> to the listing subsystem <b>318</b>, and users <b>130</b> to request listings <b>104</b> from the listing subsystem <b>318</b>.

p-0443The different interfaces of the interface subsystem <b>316</b> are described above. Specific examples of various “screens” are discussed below with respect to various screen print diagrams.

p-04442. Listing Subsystem

p-0445A listing subsystem <b>318</b> can be used to store and process the various listings <b>104</b> within the database structure <b>126</b> and accompanying information technology architecture. Any direct interaction with the listings <b>104</b> occurs through the listing subsystem <b>318</b>. The listing subsystem <b>318</b> makes the various listings <b>104</b> stored in the database structure <b>126</b> accessible to the interface subsystem <b>316</b> in accordance with the administrative rules <b>122</b>. In some embodiments, the administrative rules <b>122</b> can be accessed and modified through a focus subsystem <b>320</b> that controls how the various result heuristics <b>170</b>, response heuristics <b>172</b>, and placement heuristics <b>174</b> “focus” on various listings <b>104</b>.

p-0446The listing subsystem <b>318</b> is configured by the administrative rules <b>122</b>, which are discussed above and below. The listing subsystem <b>318</b> controls how listing records <b>128</b> are stored in the database structure <b>126</b>, and which listing attributes <b>106</b> are associated with the various listings <b>104</b>. The detailed views <b>127</b> and summary views <b>129</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b> are part of the functionality of the listing subsystem <b>318</b>.

p-04473. Focus Subsystem

p-0448<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref><i>b </i>is a block diagram illustrating one example of a subsystem-level view of the system <b>100</b> that includes an interface subsystem <b>316</b>, a listing subsystem <b>318</b>, and a focus subsystem <b>320</b>. The focus subsystem <b>320</b> provides the means for “focusing” the listings <b>104</b> made accessible to the user <b>130</b> in responses <b>144</b> to requests <b>132</b>. The focus subsystem <b>318</b> includes all of the administrative rules <b>122</b>, including the various data hierarchies defined by the administrator <b>160</b>.

p-0449The focus subsystem <b>320</b> can impact how listings <b>104</b> are created, transmitted to, stored, updated, or deleted by the listing subsystem <b>318</b>. The focus subsystem <b>320</b> can also impact how information from the interface subsystem <b>316</b> is used to obtain responses <b>144</b> from the listing subsystem <b>318</b>. The administrative rules <b>122</b> that make up the focus subsystem <b>320</b> are described above, and specific examples of those rules being implemented by the system <b>100</b> to focus various requests <b>132</b> are discussed below.

h-0024VIII. Process-Flow Views

p-0450A. System-Process Flow

p-0451<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> is a flow chart diagram illustrating one example of a process that can be performed by an administrator <b>160</b> using the system <b>100</b>.

p-0452At <b>350</b>, the administrative rules <b>122</b> are defined by the administrator <b>160</b>.

p-0453At <b>352</b>, a database structure <b>126</b> of listings <b>104</b> is maintained. As discussed above, listings <b>104</b> are typically stored as listing records <b>128</b> within the database structure <b>126</b>.

p-0454At <b>354</b>, a request <b>132</b> is received from a user <b>130</b>.

p-0455At <b>356</b>, two or more relevant groups <b>232</b> are identified to be included in the response <b>144</b>. The groups <b>232</b> can also be populated with other appropriate listings <b>104</b> during this step.

p-0456At <b>358</b>, the listings <b>104</b>, including those within the groups <b>232</b>, are ordered and positioned in accordance with the placement heuristic <b>174</b> (which can also be a referred to as a position heuristic).

p-0457At <b>360</b>, the response <b>144</b> can then be transmitted back to the user <b>130</b>. The user <b>130</b> can interact with the response <b>144</b> by activating links, calling the advertiser <b>102</b> on the phone, or any other type of follow-up activities. In some embodiments of the system <b>100</b>, the user <b>130</b> may click a link within the listing <b>104</b> to have the user access device <b>140</b> automatically call the advertiser <b>102</b> over an Internet phone service. The user <b>130</b> may invoke a compare function to place two listings <b>104</b> adjacent to each other in order to better compare the merits to the two advertisers <b>102</b> and the two listings <b>104</b>. In some embodiments, as described below, the user <b>130</b> may also toggle between detailed views <b>127</b> and summary views <b>129</b> of particular listing records <b>128</b>.

p-0458B. Advertiser-Process Flow

p-0459<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 11</figref> is a flow chart diagram illustrating one example of a process that can be performed by an advertiser <b>102</b> that submits a listing <b>104</b> to the system <b>100</b>.

p-0460At <b>362</b>, the advertiser <b>102</b> submits information for the listing <b>104</b>. This can be done electronically through the system <b>100</b>, or through more traditional hard-copy means.

p-0461At <b>364</b>, listings <b>104</b> are associated with various listing attributes <b>106</b>. This process can involve both the advertiser <b>102</b> and the administrator <b>160</b>. The advertiser <b>102</b> can play a part in identifying the audience for the listing <b>104</b>, but the administrator <b>160</b> can play an important role in placing the particular listing <b>104</b> into the context of various group hierarchies <b>178</b> that are discussed above.

p-0462At <b>366</b>, advertisers <b>102</b> can interact with users <b>102</b> after those users <b>130</b> access the particular listing <b>104</b> as part of one or more responses <b>144</b>.

p-0463At <b>368</b>, advertisers <b>102</b> can view various reports relating to listing attributes <b>106</b> and various traffic metrics. Traffic metrics are any numerical measurements relating to the “traffic” experienced by one or more of the listings <b>104</b> associated with the particular advertiser <b>102</b>. Different traffic metrics can relate to different periods of time, and different types of user <b>130</b> interactions.

p-0464At <b>370</b>, advertisers <b>102</b> can choose to update their listings <b>104</b>, including potentially changing the fee types <b>112</b> the advertiser <b>102</b> is willing to pay to the administrator <b>160</b> in light of the reports, described below, generated by the system <b>100</b>.

p-0465C. User-Process Flow

p-0466<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref> is a flow chart diagram illustrating one example of a process that can be performed by a user <b>130</b> of the system <b>100</b>.

p-0467At <b>372</b>, the user <b>130</b> selects the request attributes <b>134</b> to be included in the request <b>132</b>. This can involve making directory selections, as well as typing in text, or otherwise providing the input to better focus the desires of the user <b>130</b>.

p-0468At <b>374</b>, the user <b>130</b> submits the request <b>132</b>.

p-0469At <b>376</b>, the user <b>130</b> views the response <b>144</b>.

p-0470At <b>378</b>, the user <b>130</b> can use one of the listings <b>104</b> to activate a network link to an advertiser <b>102</b> website or other network location.

p-0471At <b>380</b>, the user <b>130</b> can use the user interface <b>142</b> to return to the response <b>144</b>.

p-0472At <b>382</b>, the user <b>130</b> can view listings <b>104</b> belonging to the same response <b>144</b>, but not displayed on the same screen. The user interface <b>142</b> can be used to scroll between different the pages on which the response <b>144</b> is displayed.

p-0473At <b>384</b>, the user <b>130</b> can invoke a detailed view <b>127</b> of one or more listings <b>104</b> of interest.

p-0474At <b>386</b>, the user <b>130</b> can invoke a “compare” function to place one selected listing <b>104</b> adjacent to another selected listing <b>104</b> in order to facilitate a comparison by the user <b>130</b>.

p-0475At <b>388</b>, the user <b>130</b> can invoke an automated communication to the advertiser <b>102</b> using the listing <b>104</b>. This can involve sending an e-mail, a facsimile, a website posting, an Internet phone call, or any other type of communication known in the art.

h-0025IX. Result, Response, and Placement Heuristics

p-0476As discussed above, the system <b>100</b> can use a variety of heuristics to identify matches, and to organize the appropriate response <b>144</b> that is transmitted to users <b>130</b>. The following examples are provided solely for illustration purposes, and should not be interpreted to be an exhaustive list of potential configurations.

p-0477A. Pre-Defined Group-Based Placements

p-0478As discussed above, some embodiments of the system <b>100</b> use the priority metric <b>179</b> associated with each listing <b>104</b> to perform intra-group sequencing but not inter-group sequencing. Such embodiments can be referred to as intra-group competition embodiments because the priorities between groups <b>232</b> are already predetermined. In intra-group embodiments, the placement heuristic <b>174</b> provides that certain groups <b>232</b> occupy certain locations in the response <b>144</b> given the particular request attributes <b>134</b> provided by the user <b>130</b>. All of the examples below presume a match with respect to the category selection <b>138</b>. The key distinguishing factors then become the geography selection <b>136</b>, one or more review/rating selections <b>139</b>, and the fee types <b>112</b> relating to the listings <b>104</b>.

p-04791. City and Zip Code Search

p-0480<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response <b>144</b> displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> after the submission of a request <b>132</b> using city and/or zip code information. The request <b>132</b> submitted by the user <b>130</b> includes a local geography selection <b>136</b>, and thus the response heuristic <b>172</b> in this particular example is configured to give priority to the smallest geographical regions (whether as a service area or the geographical scope of the advertiser <b>102</b>).

p-0481On the left side of the screen are the various groups <b>232</b> with predetermined locations within the response <b>144</b>. At the top left corner of the screen is a group of National Advertisers with Metro Service Areas (NMetro) <b>232</b>.<b>001</b> that match the geography selection <b>136</b> and possess per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b> that exceed $0.00/hit. The listings <b>104</b> associated with the applicable NMetro group <b>232</b>.<b>001</b> that possess the highest three priority metrics <b>179</b> are listed in order of their perspective priority metrics <b>179</b>, NMetro<b>1</b> (<b>104</b>.<b>001</b>), NMetro<b>2</b> (<b>104</b>.<b>002</b>), and NMetro<b>3</b> (<b>104</b>.<b>003</b>). As discussed above, the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> associated with the various listings <b>104</b> can be one of many potential inputs to the priority metric <b>179</b> calculation.

p-0482The second group <b>232</b> displayed in the response <b>144</b> is the group <b>232</b> that includes local geography regions with local service areas (LCity) <b>232</b>.<b>002</b>. This group <b>232</b>.<b>002</b> is also associated with per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b> that exceed $0.00/hit. The LCity listings <b>104</b> associated with the five highest priority metrics <b>179</b> within that group are displayed on the first screen, which is the screen displayed in the Figure.

p-0483The third group <b>232</b>.<b>003</b> displayed in the response <b>144</b> is made up of “premium advertisers” (P) (<b>104</b>.<b>009</b>-<b>104</b>.<b>015</b>), advertisers <b>102</b> associated with a monthly fixed fee <b>222</b>. The priority metric <b>179</b> for this group <b>232</b>.<b>003</b> in this particular embodiment focuses on seniority, which is a particular example of a position adjustment factor <b>176</b> because all of the advertisers <b>102</b> in this group pay the same monthly fee.

p-0484The fourth group (alphabetic listings <b>232</b>.<b>004</b>) at the bottom left hand portion of the screen are advertisers <b>102</b> sorted alphabetically. This group <b>232</b>.<b>004</b> can include both paid and unpaid listings <b>104</b>. The priority metric <b>179</b> for this group provides “points” based solely on the relative position of the advertiser <b>102</b> name with respect to the sequence of the alphabet.

p-0485On the right side of the screen are sponsored links of national advertisers <b>102</b> regardless of the existence of a matching local service area (N) <b>232</b>.<b>005</b>. N<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>21</b>, N<b>2</b><b>104</b>.<b>22</b>, and N<b>3</b><b>104</b>.<b>23</b> are the top priority metric <b>179</b> listings associated with a per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>. NFixed<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>24</b>, NFixed<b>2</b><b>104</b>.<b>25</b>, and NFixed<b>3</b><b>104</b>.<b>26</b>, are the three highest priority metrics <b>179</b> among the listings <b>104</b> associated with fixed fee amounts <b>111</b>.

p-0486As disclosed in the Figure, the response <b>144</b> includes more than one web page of listings <b>104</b>. National listings can be continued by activating the “National Listings Continued” link and local listings can be continued by activating the “Local Listings Continued” link.

p-0487a. Local Listings Continued

p-0488<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 14</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of the second screen of the response <b>144</b> in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> after the submission of a request using city and zip code information and subsequent scrolling by a user for more local listings.

p-0489The first group displayed on the screen is a continuation of the LCity group displayed in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref>. This group includes LCity<b>6</b><b>104</b>.<b>027</b> through LCity<b>10</b><b>104</b>.<b>031</b>.

p-0490The second group displayed on the screen is a group that does not appear in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref>, it is the group of local listings with county-based service areas and non-zero per-hit amounts (LCounty) <b>232</b>.<b>007</b>. LCounty<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>032</b> through LCounty<b>7</b><b>104</b>.<b>038</b> are sorted in order of the priority metric <b>179</b>

p-0491The third group displayed on the screen is a continuation of the same premium advertiser group (P) <b>232</b>.<b>008</b> that appears on <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref>.

p-0492The national sponsored links NFixed<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>047</b> through NFixed<b>3</b><b>104</b>.<b>052</b> on the right side of the screen are preferably the same national sponsored links that were displayed on the initial response <b>144</b> screen; however, these national sponsored links can be different.

p-0493b. National Listings Continued

p-0494<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 15</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of the second screen of response <b>144</b> displayed on a continuation screen in accordance with one embodiments of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> after the submission of a request <b>132</b> using city and zip code information and subsequent scrolling by a user for more national listings.

p-0495The NMetro group <b>232</b>.<b>010</b> is a continuation of the NMetro group <b>232</b>.<b>001</b> on <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 13</figref>. The priority metric <b>179</b> determines which listings <b>104</b> in this group <b>232</b>.<b>010</b> are displayed.

p-0496The next group <b>232</b> displayed on the screen is a group of national advertisers with state-level service areas (NState) <b>232</b>.<b>011</b>. NState<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>056</b> through NState5 104.060 are selected on the basis of their respective priority metric <b>179</b>, which includes the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> as one of the inputs.

p-0497The third group on the bottom left portion of the screen is made up of national listings without local or state service areas (group <b>232</b>.<b>012</b>). This group <b>232</b>.<b>012</b> includes both fixed fee listings (<b>104</b>.<b>066</b> and <b>104</b>.<b>067</b>) as well as per-hit fee amount listings <b>104</b>. In this particular example, the placement heuristic <b>174</b> reserves locations <b>6</b> and <b>7</b> within this group for fixed fee amount listings. This group <b>232</b>.<b>012</b> is an example of group that includes both per-hit and fixed fee listings in the same group. Such a characteristic is predefined by the administrator <b>160</b> in the form of the administrative rules <b>122</b>.

p-0498The national listings on the right side of the screen are the same as on the two previous figures. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 13</figref>, <b>14</b>, and <b>15</b> are all part of the same response <b>144</b>.

p-04992. State Search

p-0500<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 16</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response <b>144</b> displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> after the submission of a request using state geography information.

p-0501The group on the top left side of the screen is made up of national listings with state service areas that are associated with per-hit amounts (NState) <b>232</b>.<b>014</b>. NState<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>077</b> through NState<b>2</b><b>104</b>.<b>082</b> are sequenced by the placement heuristic <b>174</b> on the basis of the priority metric <b>179</b> associated with each listing. The priority metric <b>179</b> includes the per-hit fee amount as one on many forms of input.

p-0502The second group on the left side of the screen is made up of national listings without applicable state or local service areas. This group includes both fixed fee amount listings, such as NFixed<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>088</b> through NFixed<b>3</b><b>104</b>.<b>095</b> (a distinct subgroup of group <b>232</b>.<b>015</b>) as well as per-hit fee amount listings, such as N<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>083</b> through N<b>10</b><b>104</b>.<b>094</b> (another distinct subgroup of group <b>232</b>.<b>015</b>). Group 232.015 is an example of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> purposely interspersing fixed fee listings <b>104</b> and per-hit listings <b>104</b>.

p-0503The national sponsored links on the right side of the screen are the same as those displayed on <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 13-15</figref>.

p-05043. Business Name or Phone Number Search

p-0505<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 17</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> after the submission of a request using a business name or phone number.

p-0506The first group at the top left hand side of the screen is selected on the basis of business names or phone number. Anywhere from 1-3 listings <b>104</b> will be displayed, depending on how many listings <b>104</b> correspond to the search criteria. For example, there should only be one advertiser <b>102</b> associated with a particular phone number, but multiple advertisers <b>102</b> may share the same name. Listings <b>104</b>.<b>102</b> through <b>104</b>.<b>104</b> in Group 232.017 can be sorted in accordance with priority metric <b>179</b>.

p-0507The second group <b>232</b>.<b>018</b> is made up of national listings associated with metro service areas (NMetro). These listings <b>104</b> are made up of national advertisers <b>102</b> who have identified a metro service area for their listing <b>104</b> that corresponds to the geography selection <b>136</b> made by the user <b>130</b>. The geography selection <b>136</b> by the user <b>130</b> can correspond to the geography relating to the phone number or business name, or the geography selection <b>136</b> can relate to an affirmative geography selection <b>136</b> made by the user <b>130</b>. NMetro<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>105</b> through NMetro<b>3</b><b>104</b>.<b>107</b> can be sorted on the basis of priority metric <b>179</b> associated with those listings <b>104</b>.

p-0508The third group is made up of local listings with city service areas (LCity) <b>232</b>.<b>019</b>. These listings <b>104</b> are made up of local advertisers <b>102</b> who have identified a city service area for their listing <b>104</b> that corresponds to the geography selection <b>136</b> made by the user <b>130</b>. The geography selection <b>136</b> by the user <b>130</b> can correspond to the geography relating to the phone number or business name, or the geography selection <b>136</b> can relate to an affirmative geography selection <b>136</b> made by the user <b>130</b>. LCity<b>1</b><b>104</b>.<b>108</b> through LCity<b>5</b><b>104</b>.<b>112</b> are sorted on the basis of the priority metric <b>179</b> associated with those listings <b>104</b>.

p-0509The fourth group is made of fixed fee listings <b>104</b> with the same fixed fee amount <b>111</b>. Thus, the distinguishing input for the priority metric <b>179</b> is the seniority of each listing <b>104</b> with respect to the system <b>100</b>.

p-0510The national sponsored links on the right hand of the screen are the same as those discussed above with respect to <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 13-16</figref>.

p-05114. National Search

p-0512<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 18</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a response <b>144</b> displayed on a screen in accordance with one embodiment of the placement heuristic <b>174</b> after the submission of a request that includes a blank value for a geography selection <b>136</b>. In some embodiments, a specific button or other interface mechanism allows the user <b>130</b> to expressly select a national search. In other embodiments, a national search is performed by an absence of a geography selection <b>136</b>.

p-0513The sole group <b>232</b>.<b>024</b> on the left side of the screen is made up of national listings without reference to any subset of service areas. This group <b>232</b>.<b>024</b> is made up of two sub groups, a national per-hit group (N) <b>232</b>.<b>022</b> and a national fixed fee group (NFixed) <b>232</b>.<b>023</b>. These two groups are interspersed on the left side of the screen in a predefined manner as set forth by the placement heuristic <b>174</b>. The system <b>100</b> can incorporate a wide variety of different arrangements for two or more groups.

p-0514The national sponsors on the right side of the screen are a continuation of the NFixed group <b>232</b>.<b>023</b> on the left side of the screen.

p-0515B. Calculation of Priority Metrics in Positioning of Listings

p-05161. Priority Metrics Used for Intra-Group Sorting

p-0517<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 19</figref> is a block diagram illustrating one example of a bid-based approach where the listings are not displayed in order of bid amount. The positions of the three groups of listings <b>104</b> in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 19</figref> are predefined by the placement heuristic <b>174</b>. The intra-group positions are determined by comparing the priority metrics <b>179</b>. Example A below provides an example of the underlying data that can result in the response <b>144</b> disclosed in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 19</figref>.

a. Example A

p-0518<tables id="TABLE-US-00001" num="00001"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>45</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>40</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>39</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.05</entry><entry>35</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>28</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>$0.05</entry><entry>25</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0519Example A illustrates how the enhanced display fee <b>163</b> can add to the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> for a listing <b>104</b>, while decreasing the value of the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> used to determine the priority metric <b>179</b>. This is because less of the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> is being allocated for priority metric <b>179</b> purposes. The per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> is not independent of other listing attributes <b>106</b>. Thus, N<b>2</b> and N<b>3</b> involve a higher per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> than N<b>1</b>, but N<b>1</b> has a higher priority metric <b>179</b>. The factors by which the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>, the enhanced display fee <b>163</b>, and the position adjustment factor <b>176</b> impact the priority metric <b>179</b> can vary from embodiment to embodiment. In the example above and below, there is a 1:1 ratio between all non-monetary amounts, a $1:$1 ratio between all monetary amounts, and a $0.01:1 ratio between all monetary amounts and all numerical factors. For example, the priority metric for N<b>2</b> is =Per Hit Fee Amount−Enhanced Display Fee+Position Adjustment Factor ($0.55−$0.10+0). Different embodiments may use different ratios. In some embodiments, different groups <b>232</b> within the same response can utilize different ratios. For the purposes of subsequent examples, the ratios will be kept constant.

b. Example B

p-0520<tables id="TABLE-US-00002" num="00002"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>10</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.45</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>45</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.35</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>44</entry><entry>9</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>39</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.35</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>35</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>40</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>28</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>25</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>15</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0521Example B illustrates how the position adjustment factor <b>176</b> can increase the value of the priority metric <b>179</b> such that listings <b>104</b> associated with lower per-hit fees <b>113</b> can end up with more desirable positions within the sequence.

c. Example C

p-0522<tables id="TABLE-US-00003" num="00003"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>10</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.45</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>45</entry><entry>10</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.35</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>35</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>39</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.35</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>35</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>40</entry><entry>30</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>28</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>$0.05</entry><entry>25</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0523Example C illustrates an example that includes both enhanced display fees <b>163</b> and position adjustment factors <b>176</b>. As illustrated in the example, these two attributes can offset each other to some extent.

d. Example D

p-0524<tables id="TABLE-US-00004" num="00004"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1 or 2</entry><entry>$0.19</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>1 or 2</entry><entry>$0.13</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.07</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>39</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.35</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>35</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>40</entry><entry>30</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>28</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>$0.05</entry><entry>25</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0525Example D illustrates an example that includes bid tiers <b>169</b> for the national advertisers <b>102</b>. Bids from $0.01 through $0.10 belong to same tier. Bids $0.11 through $0.20 belong to the same tier, and so on and so forth. Within a bid tier <b>169</b>, each listing <b>104</b> has the same priority metric <b>179</b>.

e. Example E

p-0526<tables id="TABLE-US-00005" num="00005"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.24</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>24</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.45</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>45</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.44</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>44</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.43</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>43</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.41</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>41</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>40</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0527Example E illustrates an example where different groups have different minimum bids. In the example above, national listings have minimum per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b> of $0.20 while local listings have minimum per-hit fee amounts <b>113</b> of $0.40.

f. Example F

p-0528<tables id="TABLE-US-00006" num="00006"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>60</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>40</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.70</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>70</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.65</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>60</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>55</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0529Example F illustrates an example similar to Example E, except that in addition to the minimum bid restrictions, there are also minimum bid increments <b>167</b> for listings <b>104</b> in both the national and local groups. The minimum bid increment for national listings <b>104</b> in this example is $0.10 and the minimum bid increment for local listings <b>104</b> is $0.05. The minimum bid for national listings is $0.40 and the minimum bid for local listings is $0.50.

g. Example G

p-0530<tables id="TABLE-US-00007" num="00007"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.54</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>64</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.58</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>58</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.57</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>57</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.56</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>56</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.54</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>54</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.53</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.52</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>52</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$0.51</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>51</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0531Example G and subsequent examples do not relate to <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 19</figref>. Example G illustrates an example of a single group response <b>144</b> where the listing <b>104</b> with the highest per-hit fee <b>113</b> does not possess the highest priority metric <b>179</b> due to a position adjustment factor <b>176</b> associated with another listing <b>104</b>.

h. Example H

p-0532<tables id="TABLE-US-00008" num="00008"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0" pgwide="1"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry /></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fixed Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.64</entry><entry>64</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>64</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.68</entry><entry>58</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>58</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.57</entry><entry>57</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>57</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.56</entry><entry>56</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>56</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.54</entry><entry>54</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>54</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.53</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.52</entry><entry>52</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>52</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$0.51</entry><entry>51</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>51</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry>N10</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0533Example H illustrates an example of a single group response <b>144</b> where the listing <b>104</b> with the highest per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> does not possess the highest value for purposes of the priority metric <b>179</b> due to an enhanced display fee <b>163</b> relating to that listing <b>104</b>.

i. Example I

p-0534<tables id="TABLE-US-00009" num="00009"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.64</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>64</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.58</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>58</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>NFixed1</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>100</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.56</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>56</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.54</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>54</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.53</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.52</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>52</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$0.51</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>51</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>50</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0535Example I illustrates an example of a multiple-group response that is not sorted in order determined by the priority metric <b>179</b> because the two groups within the response have pre-defined slots reserved for a certain number of listings <b>104</b> in those groups <b>232</b>. In Example I, the third spot in the display order is reserved for fixed-fee listings <b>104</b> while spots <b>1</b>, <b>2</b>, and <b>4</b>-<b>10</b> are reserved for per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> listings <b>104</b> determined in accordance with the priority metric <b>179</b>. In example 1, the prioritization metric <b>179</b> is limited to intra-group comparisons.

j. Example J

p-0536<tables id="TABLE-US-00010" num="00010"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Dis-</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry></row><row><entry /><entry>play</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Type 1</entry><entry>Type 2</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="21pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.64</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.58</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>62</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>$0.56</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>62</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>57</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.54</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>54</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.53</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.52</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.51</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>52</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$1.00</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0537Example J illustrates an example of a single-group response <b>144</b> that is sorted on the basis of the priority metric <b>179</b>. Example J involves a situation where there is more than one type of per hit fee amount <b>113</b>. For example, the per hit fee type <b>2</b> could relate to “map hits” to the advertiser's <b>102</b> website, while per hit fee type <b>1</b> could relate to “web hits.” Map hits, web hits, and other types of hits are described in greater detail above. Different embodiments can involve a wide variety of different weights given to different types of per hit fee types in the calculation of the priority metric <b>179</b>.

k. Example K

p-0538<tables id="TABLE-US-00011" num="00011"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Dis-</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry /><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>play</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Relevance</entry><entry>Popularity</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Metric</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="21pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>80</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>50</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.58</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>78</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.56</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>74</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>18</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.63</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>68</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.64</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>64</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.53</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>63</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.38</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>15</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.51</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>51</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0539Example K illustrates an example of a single-group response <b>144</b> that is sorted on the basis of the priority metric <b>179</b>. Example K involves a situation where a relevance metric and a popularity metric are incorporated into the process of determining the priority metric <b>179</b> and there is a 1:1 ratio between all non-monetary amounts, a $1:$1 ratio between all monetary amounts and a $0.01:1 ratio between all monetary amounts and non-monetary amounts.

l. Example L

p-0540<tables id="TABLE-US-00012" num="00012"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry /><entry>Time</entry></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Hit</entry><entry>Frame</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Type 1</entry><entry>Type 2</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Threshold</entry><entry>(hours)</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.80</entry><entry>65</entry><entry>1000</entry><entry>24</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>62</entry><entry>500</entry><entry>36</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>62</entry><entry>1000</entry><entry>24</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>57</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>54</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>53</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>$0.10</entry><entry>52</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$1.00</entry><entry>$1.00</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0541Example L illustrates an example of a per-hit fee adjustment based on a pre-determined hit threshold. The column “Per-hit fee type <b>1</b>” illustrates the fee paid for a number of hits within a predetermined time represented by the column “Time Frame” that are less than the number illustrated in the column “Hit Threshold”. Once the hit threshold is reached each additional hit within the pre-determined time will be in accordance with the corresponding listing associated with the column “Per-Hit Fee Type 2”. In the example, the per-hit fee for N<b>1</b> increases from $0.10 to $0.80 if there are more than 1000 hits within 24 hours. The adjustment for N<b>2</b> is activated after only 500 hits within 36 hours. In contrast to N<b>1</b> and N<b>2</b>, N<b>3</b> pays less per-hit once the hit threshold is reached. In many embodiments, the pre-determined time will be fixed and adjustments made to the hit threshold. Thus, the time frame will not be explicitly provided as a variable.

p-0542It is possible to have different fees as the number of hits within the pre-determined time continues to increase in accordance with a step function. In this example, only a single adjustment is shown.

m. Example M

p-0543<tables id="TABLE-US-00013" num="00013"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="6"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="6" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Per-</entry><entry /><entry /><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Hit</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry /><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Competitive</entry><entry /></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>Order</entry><entry>Type 1</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Rank</entry><entry>Tier</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="6" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="6"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1, 2, or 3</entry><entry>$0.90</entry><entry>90</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>1</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>1, 2, or 3</entry><entry>$0.80</entry><entry>80</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>1</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>1, 2, or 3</entry><entry>$0.70</entry><entry>70</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>1</entry></row><row><entry>N4</entry><entry>4, 5, or 6</entry><entry>$0.68</entry><entry>68</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>2</entry></row><row><entry>N5</entry><entry>4, 5, or 6</entry><entry>$0.63</entry><entry>63</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>2</entry></row><row><entry>N6</entry><entry>4, 5, or 6</entry><entry>$0.49</entry><entry>49</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>2</entry></row><row><entry>N7</entry><entry>7, 8, or 9</entry><entry>$0.47</entry><entry>47</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>3</entry></row><row><entry>N8</entry><entry>7, 8, or 9</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>3</entry></row><row><entry>N9</entry><entry>7, 8, or 9</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>3</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="6" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0544Example M illustrates an example of a multiple-tier <b>169</b> response <b>144</b>. In the example, there are three tiers <b>169</b> that are made up of three listings <b>104</b> each. The tier placement heuristic <b>176</b> for each tier <b>169</b> in the example is a random heuristic. Thus, although N<b>3</b> has underbid N<b>1</b> by $0.20/hit, N<b>1</b>, N<b>2</b> and N<b>3</b> each have a ⅓ probability of being listing first in the particular response <b>144</b>.

n. Example N

p-0545<tables id="TABLE-US-00014" num="00014"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry /><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry /><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Rating</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="7"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10.5</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>9.55</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>8.6</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>10.39</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>8.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>8.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>6.28</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>4.3</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>18</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>11</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="7" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0546Example N illustrates how review and/or rating information <b>171</b> can effectively add to the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> for a listing <b>104</b>, while decreasing the value of the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> used to determine the priority metric <b>179</b>. That is, in this example, less of the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> is being allocated for priority metric <b>179</b> purposes. The per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> is not independent of other listing attributes <b>106</b>. Thus, N<b>2</b> and N<b>3</b> involve a higher per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> than N<b>1</b>, but N<b>1</b> has a higher priority metric <b>179</b>. The factors by which the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>, review and/or rating information <b>171</b>, and the position adjustment factor <b>176</b> impact the priority metric <b>179</b> can vary from embodiment to embodiment. In this example, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is effectively weighted so that review and/or rating information <b>171</b> is given more emphasis than per hit-fee amount <b>113</b>. Thus, in this example, the priority metric for N<b>2</b> is 9.55=Per Hit Fee Amount+Rating+Position Adjustment Factor ($0.55+9+0). Different embodiments may use different weightings or different priority metrics altogether to account for review and/or rating information <b>171</b>.

p-0547As noted above, review and/or rating information <b>171</b> in some embodiments includes ratings associated with multiple review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b>. Thus, the “rating” included in priority metric <b>179</b> could be a combination of ratings for various review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b> associated with a listing <b>104</b>.

o. Example O

p-0548<tables id="TABLE-US-00015" num="00015"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0" pgwide="1"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry /><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry /></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Rating</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fixed Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>10.6</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10.5</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>9.55</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>10.39</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>8.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>8.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>6.28</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>4.3</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>18</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>11</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0549Example O shows an instance in which an advertiser <b>102</b> (N<b>3</b>) with a lower rating than other advertisers <b>102</b> (N<b>1</b> and N<b>2</b>) is nonetheless displayed as the first listing <b>104</b> in its group because of an enhanced display fee and a higher per-hit fee amount <b>113</b>. In this example, priority metric <b>179</b> for N<b>3</b> is 10.6=Per Hit Fee Amount+Rating+Position Adjustment Factor+(Enhanced Display Fee)*<b>10</b> ($0.60+8+0+($0.20)(10)).

p. Example P

p-0550<tables id="TABLE-US-00016" num="00016"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0" pgwide="1"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry>Ratings</entry><entry /><entry /><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Display</entry><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry /><entry>Tier</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry>Order</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry /><entry>Assigned</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry /></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>(Group)</entry><entry>Amount</entry><entry>Rating</entry><entry>Weight</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fixed Fee</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.55</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>1.25</entry><entry>11.8</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.60</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>1.25</entry><entry>10.6</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.50</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>0.75</entry><entry>8.0</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.39</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>10.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>8.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L4</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.28</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>1.25</entry><entry>7.8</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L3</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>0.75</entry><entry>6.4</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>L5</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.30</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>4.3</entry><entry>0</entry><entry> $0</entry></row><row><entry>P1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>18.0</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry>P2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>0.5</entry><entry>8.0</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$100</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0551Example P shows an example in which ratings tiers <b>173</b> have influenced the sort order. Example P is otherwise very similar to Example N, and a comparison with Example N shows how ratings tiers <b>173</b> can influence response <b>144</b>. Here the priority metric for N<b>2</b> is 11.8=Per Hit Fee Amount+(Rating)*(Ratings Tier Assigned Weight)+Position Adjustment Factor ($0.55+9+0).

p-05522. Priority Metrics Used for Inter-Group Sorting

p-0553In one preferred embodiment, the prioritization metric <b>179</b> is limited to intra-group sequencing. In alternative embodiments, it may be used for inter-group sequencing, as illustrated in Example P.

p-0554<tables id="TABLE-US-00017" num="00017"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0" pgwide="1"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="10"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="14pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="9" colwidth="42pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="10" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="10" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Per-Hit</entry><entry>Enhanced</entry><entry>Priority</entry><entry>Position</entry><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Display</entry><entry>Metric</entry><entry>Adjustment</entry><entry>Fixed</entry><entry>Category</entry><entry>Geography</entry><entry /></row><row><entry>Advertiser</entry><entry>#</entry><entry>Amt.</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Value</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Fee</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Factor</entry><entry>Rating</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="10" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="10"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="14pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="35pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="9" colwidth="42pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="10" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>LCity2</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>$0.41</entry><entry>$0.06</entry><entry>95</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>8</entry></row><row><entry>LCity1</entry><entry>1</entry><entry>$0.40</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>89</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry><entry>10</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>9</entry></row><row><entry>LFixed1</entry><entry>3</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>82</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$50</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>7</entry></row><row><entry>N1</entry><entry>4</entry><entry>$0.35</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>73</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>8</entry></row><row><entry>N2</entry><entry>6</entry><entry>$0.31</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>70</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>9</entry></row><row><entry>LFixed2</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>69</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$43</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>6</entry></row><row><entry>NFixed1</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>64</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$40</entry><entry>20</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>4</entry></row><row><entry>LCity3</entry><entry>8</entry><entry>$0.08</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>46</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>8</entry></row><row><entry>N3</entry><entry>9</entry><entry>$0.20</entry><entry>$0.00</entry><entry>30</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>$0</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>0</entry><entry>10</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="10" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

p-0555In many embodiments, the priority metric <b>179</b> will involve different ratios when dealing with fixed monetary amounts <b>111</b> than in the context of a per hit fee amount <b>113</b>. Typically, either the fixed fee will need to be divided by some number or the per-hit fee amount <b>113</b> multiplied by some number in order to prevent all fixed fee listings <b>104</b> from dominating the per-hit fee listings <b>104</b>. For example, the priority metric <b>179</b> in Example P above is calculated as follows: (Per Hit Fee Amount+Enhanced Display Fee)*100+Position Adjustment Factor+Fixed Fee+Category Factor+Rating. As described below, those skilled in the art will understand that the various factors used in calculating priority metric <b>179</b> can be weighted to achieve whatever results are desired.

p-0556C. Use of Information within the Detailed View

p-0557Information within the detailed view <b>127</b> of a listing <b>104</b> can be taken into consideration by the system <b>100</b> in providing results and responses <b>144</b> to requests <b>132</b>. For example, the user <b>130</b> submitting the request <b>132</b> might be interested in a particular brand of a digital camera. The category hierarchy <b>164</b> may not have enough levels to include brand identities within the category hierarchy <b>164</b>. However, if the detailed view <b>127</b> for a particular listing <b>104</b> includes the particular brand, the priority metric <b>179</b> can be adjusted accordingly so that the listing <b>104</b>, which includes the particular brand, receives more favorable treatment than it otherwise would.

p-0558Different embodiments can use different processes for modifying the priority metric <b>179</b> for a listing <b>104</b> on the basis of information within the detailed view <b>127</b> of the listing <b>104</b>. For example, if the focus is on rating and/or review information <b>171</b>, greater weight could be given to a rating for a listing <b>104</b> by multiplying it by a factor of 10, 100, or any other number. Further, as noted above, the focus on different rating and/or review attributes <b>109</b> can be fine-tuned by incorporating including only review and/or rating information <b>171</b> associated with particular review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b> into priority metric <b>179</b>, or by assigning different weights within priority metric <b>179</b> to different ratings associated with various review and/or rating attributes <b>109</b>.

h-0042X. Interface Views

p-0559A. Request Submission Page

p-0560<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 20</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page that includes various high-level categories (e.g. level <b>1</b> categories <b>182</b>), and some more detailed categories (e.g. level <b>2</b> categories <b>184</b>). As illustrated in the Figure, request attributes <b>134</b> can take the form of directory selections as well as the input of data by the user <b>130</b>. Request attributes <b>134</b> can include text describing the product, such as brand information. Requests <b>132</b> can also include the name of a particular advertiser <b>102</b>. As indicated by the word “optional,” all of the geographic selections <b>136</b> are optional with respect to the particular embodiment displayed in the Figure. Other embodiments may involve different rules regarding what is or is not required. As indicated on the left side of the Figure, the illustrated embodiment provides users <b>130</b> with the ability to save requests <b>132</b>, responses <b>144</b>, and potentially other types of information.

p-0561<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 21</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page with a text string corresponding to a category selection entered by a user <b>130</b>. Although the text string does not directly equate to any of the category headings displayed on the screen, submission of the text string “furniture” would constitute a category selection <b>138</b>. The submission of such a request <b>132</b> would invoke the system <b>100</b> to identify the appropriate category within the category hierarchy <b>164</b> described above.

p-0562<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 22</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page with text strings corresponding to a category selection <b>138</b> and a geography selection <b>136</b> entered by a user <b>130</b>. This Figure provides an example of request <b>132</b> that includes both a non-null category selection <b>138</b> and a non-null geography selection <b>136</b>.

p-0563<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 23</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a request submission web page displaying more detailed sub-categories associated with the higher furniture category. The categories displayed on this screen are all sub-categories of the furniture category. Thus, the potential category selections <b>138</b> on this page are significantly lower on the category hierarchy <b>164</b> than in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 20-22</figref> discussed above. In some embodiments, as displayed in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 23</figref>, fixed fee amount listings <b>104</b> can be displayed on the more detailed directory pages.

p-0564B. Response Page

p-0565<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 24</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings <b>104</b> associated with the sub-category of “room accessories.” This Figure illustrates an example of a user drilling down the directory of <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 23</figref>, and ultimately running out of lower category level options. The system <b>100</b> reacted to the request <b>132</b> of a “room accessories” category selection <b>138</b> and a “null” or “blank” geographic selection <b>136</b>. The user <b>130</b> is in the process of modifying their request <b>132</b> so that a geography selection <b>136</b> of White Plains, N.Y. will be sent to the system <b>100</b>.

p-0566<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 25</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings <b>104</b> associated with the antiques sub-category. Unlike the example in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 24</figref>, <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 25</figref><i>a </i>provides an example where there are non-null inputs for both the category selection <b>138</b> and the geography selection <b>136</b>. This Figure also illustrates “compare” check boxes and a “compare” button for invoking the compare function described above. The various subdivisions among the listings <b>104</b> indicate that several different groups <b>232</b> are included in the displayed response <b>144</b>. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 25</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 25</figref><i>a. </i>

p-0567<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 26</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings <b>104</b> associated with the furniture category and a local geography. The listings <b>104</b> displayed on this screen illustrate some examples of enhanced displays meriting the charge of an enhanced display fee <b>163</b>. For example, two of the listings <b>104</b> include text that is substantially larger in size than the other listings <b>104</b>. A logo for “Freedmans furniture” is shown. Other listings <b>104</b> include a click through icon with the words “Click Here!” and the icons themselves are different. Various listings <b>104</b> include additional useful information. The various subdivisions among the listings <b>104</b> indicate that several different groups <b>232</b> are included in the displayed response <b>144</b>. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 26</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of the screen print of <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 26</figref><i>a. </i>

p-0568<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings <b>104</b> associated with the furniture category and a local geography. According to the note at the top of the screen, the system <b>100</b> has some reason to believe that the user <b>130</b> is interested in the antiques sub-category (see bottom of <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>a </i>and top of <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>b</i>). This could be due to a user profile, recent navigations by the user <b>130</b>, or some other historical attribute. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>b </i>is a bottom portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 27</figref><i>a. </i>

p-0569<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 28</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography, including two listings that have been selected for the purposes of a “compare” function. (See <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 36</figref> for the result of selecting the comparison function). <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 28</figref><i>b </i>is the bottom portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 28</figref><i>b. </i>

p-0570<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 29</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography. The sub-category “living room” is highlighted from a sub-category selection window, and the top of the screen explains that the submit button should be pressed to include the category selection <b>138</b> of “living room” as part of the request <b>132</b>. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 29</figref><i>b </i>is the bottom portion of a screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 29</figref><i>a. </i>

p-0571<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 30</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the furniture category and a local geography. The user <b>130</b> has activated the phone link for one of the listings <b>104</b>, and the top of the screen is displaying the appropriate message. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 30</figref><i>b </i>is the bottom portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 30</figref><i>a. </i>

p-0572<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 31</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a web page displaying listings associated with the “living room” sub-category and a local geography. In accordance with the message at the top of the screen, the e-mail link for one of the listings <b>104</b> has been highlighted, but not yet activated. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 31</figref><i>b </i>is the bottom portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 31</figref><i>b. </i>

p-0573C. Contact Information Page

p-0574<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 32</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of an advertiser contact information web page. Different advertisers <b>102</b> can include a wide variety of different contact information. One feature disclosed on this screen is the ability to invoke an Internet phone service by clicking on the phone link. Some embodiments may provide for an automated fax service. The contact information can be saved by the user <b>130</b> for future use.

p-0575D. Bid Selection Page

p-0576<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 33</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a bid entry web page for use by advertisers <b>102</b>. Each of the checkboxes is associated with a different geographical region, and each region can be associated with a separate bid amount. The functionality of this screen is configured by the administrative rules <b>122</b> discussed above. If the particular embodiment of the system <b>100</b> includes minimum fees <b>165</b>, minimum bid increments <b>167</b>, bid tiers <b>169</b>, or enhanced display fees <b>163</b>, those restrictions can be represented on the web page accessed by the advertiser <b>102</b>.

p-0577E. Advertiser Report Page

p-0578<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 34</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a monthly report web page accessible by advertisers <b>102</b>. The disclosed web page also provides a “change” feature for the advertiser <b>102</b> to alter their bid with respect to a particular listing <b>104</b>. As indicated by the Figure, categories with hierarchical relationships with each other can be associated with different bid amounts and other fees. Sofas, furniture, and interior decorating are each categories with direct relationships with each other.

p-0579F. Detailed View of a Listing

p-0580<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 35</figref><i>a </i>is a top portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a detailed view <b>127</b> of a listing <b>104</b>. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 35</figref><i>b </i>is the bottom portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 35</figref><i>a</i>. Different detailed views <b>127</b> within the same response <b>144</b> may display different listing attributes <b>106</b>. The administrative rules <b>122</b> can be configured to restrict certain listing attributes <b>106</b>, while requiring other listing attributes <b>106</b>.

p-0581G. Compare Screen

p-0582<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 36</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of a “compare” feature. Two listings <b>104</b> are displayed adjacent to each other. In alternative embodiments, different physical layouts can be used to facilitate the comparison of two or more listings <b>104</b>.

p-0583H. Directions Page

p-0584<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 37</figref><i>a </i>is the bottom portion of a screen print illustrating an example of a “directions” feature. To reach this screen, the user <b>130</b> clicked on a “directions” link for a listing <b>104</b> within the response <b>144</b>. <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 37</figref><i>b </i>is the top portion of the screen print in <figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 37</figref><i>b. </i>

p-0585I. E-mail Function

p-0586<figref idrefs="DRAWINGS">FIG. 38</figref> is a screen print illustrating an example of an “e-mail” feature. E-mail links within the various listings <b>104</b> can be configured so that the advertiser <b>102</b> is made aware of the fact that the user <b>130</b> obtained the e-mail address for the advertiser <b>102</b> through the system <b>100</b>. This allows the advertiser <b>102</b> to monitor the number of communications that result from system <b>100</b> communications. A per e-mail charge can be incorporated into the business relationship between the advertiser <b>102</b> and the administrator <b>160</b>.

h-0043XI. Alternative Embodiments

p-0587In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principles and modes of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in preferred embodiments. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than is specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope.