Distributed circular geometry power amplifier architecture
Summary by NHIP
Distributed circular power amplifier
The power amplifier connects push-pull amplifiers in a circular geometry where adjacent gain blocks form a single current path and a virtual ac ground. Adjacent control terminals receive input signals of equal magnitude and opposite phase to drive alternating current around the circular path.
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
The present invention discloses a distributed power amplifier topology and device that efficiently and economically enhances the power output of an RF signal to be amplified. The power amplifier comprises a plurality of push-pull amplifiers interconnected in a novel circular geometry that preferably function as a first winding of an active transformer having signal inputs of adjacent amplification devices driven with an input signal of equal magnitude and opposite phase. The topology also discloses the use of a secondary winding that matches the geometry of primary winding and variations thereof that serve to efficiently combine the power of the individual power amplifiers. The novel architecture enables the design of low-cost, fully-integrated, high-power amplifiers in the RF, microwave, and millimeter-wave frequencies.

Term
Term ended
Expired 9 October 2021, 5 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
21 claims: 4 independent, 17 dependent
- 1A power amplifier comprising:a plurality of push-pull amplifiers, each amplifier including two gain blocks;and wherein one of the two gain blocks of each push-pull amplifier is connected to one of the gain blocks of an adjacent push-pull amplifier so as to form a single current path through each push-pull amplifier, and wherein one or more connected terminals of the adjacent gain blocks form a virtual ac ground.
- 6A power amplifier comprising:a first push-pull amplifier including a first gain block and a second gain block, each gain block having two ports, the gain blocks being interconnected at one of their two ports by a first primary winding segment;and a second push-pull amplifier including a third gain block connected the second gain block and a fourth gain block, the third and fourth gain blocks each having two ports, the gain blocks of the second push-pull amplifier being interconnected at one of their two ports by a second primary winding segment.
- 13Broadest claimClaim Score 86, broad(NHIP)A method for amplifying power, comprising:connecting a plurality of push-pull amplifiers in series with a primary winding;driving adjacent gain blocks of the push-pull amplifiers with input signals;and combining the output power of the push-pull amplifiers in the primary winding using a secondary winding that is magnetically coupled to the primary winding.
- 18A power amplifier comprising:a plurality of push-pull amplifiers, each amplifier including two gain blocks;and wherein one of the two gain blocks of each push-pull amplifier is connected to one of the gain blocks of an adjacent push-pull amplifier so as to form a single current path through each push-pull amplifier, wherein each push-pull amplifier has a first control terminal and a second control terminal and the first and second control terminals of each push-pull amplifier are adapted to receive an ac input signal of at least substantially equal magnitude and opposite phase relative to the first and second control terminals of an adjacent gain block.
Independent claims4
86 paragraphs in 5 sections, as filed
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
0001This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/239,470 and 60/239,474, both filed on Oct. 10, 2000 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/288,601, filed on May 4, 2001, and is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/974,578, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,816,012, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/942,348, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
00021. Field of the Invention
0003The present invention relates to high frequency power amplifiers and more particularly to techniques for combining, monolithically or otherwise, individual power amplifiers to achieve power combining and impedance transformation.
00042. Description of the Related Art
0005The design of high frequency power amplifiers with reasonable power levels, efficiency and gain remains one of the major challenges in the pursuit of a single-chip integrated transceiver. Although several advances have been made in this direction, the design of a truly integrated power amplifier on a lossy substrate, such as silicon or silicon germanium has been an elusive goal.
0006Multiple external components such as bonding wires and external baluns have been used as tuned elements to produce output power levels in excess of 1 W using CMOS transistors. See e.g., K. C. Tsai and P. R. Gray, “A 19 GHz, 1-W CMOS Class-E Power Amplifier for Wireless Communications,” <i>IEEE Journal of Solid</i>-<i>State Circuits</i>, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 962-969, July 1999 <sup>[1]</sup>; and C. Yoo and Q. Huang, “A Common-Gate Switched, 0.9 W Class-E Power Amplifier with 41% PAE in 0.25 μm CMOS,” <i>Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest</i>, pp. 56-57, Honolulu, June 2000 <sup>[2]</sup>. Similar performance levels have been achieved with Si-Bipolar transistors. See, e.g. W. Simbürger, et al, “A Monolithic Transformer Coupled 5-W Silicon Power Amplifier with 59% PAE at 0.9 GHz,” <i>IEEE Journal of Solid</i>-<i>State Circuits</i>, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1881-1892, December 1999 <sup>[3]</sup>; and W. Simbürger, et al., “A Monolithic 2.5V, 1 W Silicon Bipolar Power Amplifier with 55% PAE at 1.9 GHz,” <i>IEEE MTT</i>-<i>S Digest</i>, vol. 2, pp. 853-856, Boston, June, 2000. <sup>[4]</sup>
0007Moreover, alternative technologies for active devices with higher breakdown voltages and higher substrate resistivity have been used to increase the output power and efficiency of integrated amplifiers. For example, LDMOS transistors with a breakdown voltage of 20V have been used on a semi-insulating substrate, but still this design delivers only 200 mW. See, Y. Tan, et al., “A 900-MHz Fully Integrated SOI Power Amplifier for Single-Chip Wireless Transceiver Applications,” <i>IEEE Solid</i>-<i>State Circ</i>., vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1481-1485, October 2000 <sup>[5]</sup>. Further, GaAs MESFET's on insulating substrates have been used to integrate power amplifiers. J. Portilla, H. Garcia, and E. Artal, “High Power-Added Efficiency MMIC Amplifier for 2.4 GHz Wireless Communications,” <i>IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits</i>, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 120-123, January 1999 <sup>[6]</sup>. Unfortunately, these technologies are significantly more costly and more difficult to manufacture than conventional silicon-based transistor technologies, such as CMOS.
0008A summary of these prior achievements in the design of high-frequency, low voltage power amplifiers is provided in Table 1:
0009<tables id="TABLE-US-00001" num="00001"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" rowsep="1">TABLE 1</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry>External</entry><entry /><entry /></row><row><entry>Freq.</entry><entry>P<sub>out</sub></entry><entry>Supply</entry><entry>PAE</entry><entry>Wirebond</entry><entry>Compo-</entry><entry>Active</entry><entry>Ref.</entry></row><row><entry>(GHz)</entry><entry>(W)</entry><entry>Voltage</entry><entry>%</entry><entry>Inductor?</entry><entry>nents?</entry><entry>Device</entry><entry>No.</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="8"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="21pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="3" colwidth="28pt" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="4" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="5" colwidth="35pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="6" colwidth="28pt" align="center" /><colspec colname="7" colwidth="35pt" align="left" /><colspec colname="8" colwidth="21pt" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry>1.9</entry><entry>1.0</entry><entry>2</entry><entry>41</entry><entry>YES</entry><entry>YES</entry><entry>CMOS</entry><entry>[1]</entry></row><row><entry>0.9</entry><entry>1.0</entry><entry>1.9</entry><entry>41</entry><entry>YES</entry><entry>YES</entry><entry>CMOS</entry><entry>[2]</entry></row><row><entry>0.9</entry><entry>5.0</entry><entry>4.5</entry><entry>59</entry><entry>NO</entry><entry>YES</entry><entry>Si Bipolar</entry><entry>[3]</entry></row><row><entry>1.9</entry><entry>1.4</entry><entry>2.5</entry><entry>55</entry><entry>NO</entry><entry>YES</entry><entry>Si Bipolar</entry><entry>[4]</entry></row><row><entry>0.9</entry><entry>0.2</entry><entry>5</entry><entry>49</entry><entry>NO</entry><entry>NO</entry><entry>SOI</entry><entry>[5]</entry></row><row><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry /><entry>LDMOS</entry></row><row><entry>2.4</entry><entry>0.25</entry><entry>7</entry><entry>79</entry><entry>NO</entry><entry>NO</entry><entry>MESFET</entry><entry>[6]</entry></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="8" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0010Two significant problems in the design of a fully-integrated high speed solid state power amplifier using conventional silicon technologies such as CMOS are (1) the low resistivity of the lossy substrate which increases the loss of on-chip inductors and transformers; and (2) the low breakdown voltages of the transistors. These problems are exacerbated as the minimum feature sizes of the transistors (such as CMOS) are scaled down for faster operation.
0011More particularly, the high conductivity of lossy substrates causes long metal lines, including conventional spiral inductors fabricated on the same substrate, to be very lossy in terms of power. If the metal lines are made wide to reduce resistance, the capacitive coupling effect between the metal and substrate will drain part of the current to the substrate, thereby increasing power dissipation. On the other hand, if the metal lines are made narrow enough to effectively overcome this problem, the metal resistance will significantly increase, again absorbing (dissipating) a significant portion of the power.
0012The low breakdown voltage of conventional transistors such as CMOS, for example, limits the maximum allowable drain voltage swing of the transistor. This makes it necessary to perform some form of impedance transformation to achieve a larger output power. For example, a ±2V drain voltage swing delivers only 40 mW to a 50Ω load if no such impedance transformation is performed. While impedance transformation can be achieved using a 1:n transformer, unfortunately, an on-chip spiral 1:n transformer on a standard CMOS substrate is very lossy and will degrade the performance of the amplifier greatly. Alternatively, an on-chip resonant match could be used, but this technique also results in significant power loss.
0013In sum, as all high frequency power amplifiers ostensibly require some inductors—essentially long metal lines—for matching purposes, connections for the supplies, and some form of power combining, conventional power amplifier circuits tend to be very power inefficient and not commercially viable above certain power and frequency levels.
0014Thus, it would be highly desirable to have a low cost, fully integratable topology for a power amplifier that can be fabricated with low cost, silicon-based processes and that can provide significant output power levels in the microwave and millimeter-wave frequency ranges. It would also be desirable if such a topology could be implemented with discrete power amplifiers as well as monolithic integration techniques. Ideally, this architecture would also be useful in the design of both lossy substrate IC's as well as non-lossy substrate IC's.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
0015The present invention, which addresses these needs, resides in a distributed, circular-geometry, power amplifier as a means for power combining and impedance transformation to achieve a very high output power in a small package and to overcome the low breakdown voltage of conventional active devices such as short-channel MOS transistors.
0016In particular, the present invention resides in a distributed, circular geometry, power amplifier for amplifying an RF input signal that comprises a plurality of smaller push-pull amplifiers. Each amplifier includes two gain blocks that each has an input port with positive and negative terminals and an output port with positive and negative terminals. The two gain blocks of each push-pull amplifier are interconnected at the positive terminals of their respective output ports by an inductive path and share a common supply voltage to the positive terminals of their respective output ports. The negative terminal of the output port of each gain block of each push-pull amplifier is connected to negative terminal of the output port of a gain block of an adjacent push-pull amplifier such that the amplifiers are configured in an interconnected circular geometry, with the connected negative terminals of adjacent gain blocks being connected together to form a virtual ac ground.
0017In operation, the input port of each gain block is adapted to receive an ac input signal of at least substantially equal magnitude and opposite phase relative to the input port of an adjacent gain block. The push-pull amplifiers are interconnected such that, for the fundamental frequency of operation, virtual ac-grounds are presented at the negative terminals of the output ports of the gain blocks.
0018In a more detailed aspect of the present invention, the distributed circular geometry power amplifier comprises at least two push-pulls amplifiers designed to amplify an RF input signal. A first push-pull amplifier includes a first gain block and a second gain block, each block having an input port with positive and negative terminals and an output port with positive and negative terminals, the blocks being interconnected at the positive terminals of their respective output ports by an inductive path. A second push-pull amplifier includes a third gain block adjacent the second gain block and a fourth gain block, the third and fourth gain block each having an input port with positive and negative terminals and an output port with positive and negative terminals, the gain blocks of the second push-pull amplifier being interconnected at the positive terminals of their respective output ports by an inductive path. In order to create the “circular” closed loop, the second and third gain blocks are interconnected at the negative terminals of their respective output ports and the negative terminal of the output port of the fourth gain block is connected to the negative terminal of the output port of the first gain block such that substantially all ac current that flows from the fourth gain block flows into the first gain block. The fourth and first gain blocks may, but typically will not, be directly connected to each other. In a typical configuration, at least (and preferable more than) one additional push-pull amplifier having a pair of interconnected gain blocks is provided between the fourth and first gain block, such that the negative terminal of the output port of the fourth gain block is indirectly connected to the negative terminal of the output port of the first gain block via this at least one additional push-pull amplifier.
0019In a more detailed embodiment, the power amplifier further includes a third and fourth push-pull amplifier, thereby creating a quad-push-pull power amplifier with eight gain blocks. In particular, the third push-pull amplifier has fifth and sixth gain blocks, each having an input port with positive and negative terminals and an output port with positive and negative terminals, the fifth and sixth blocks being interconnected at the positive terminals of their respective output ports by an inductive path. Similarly, the fourth push-pull amplifier has seventh and eighth gain blocks, each block having an input port with positive and negative terminals and an output port with positive and negative terminals, the seventh and eighth blocks being interconnected at the positive terminals of their respective output ports by an inductive path. The quad-amplifier device is interconnected such that the negative terminal of the output port of the fourth gain block is connected to the negative terminal of the output port of the fifth gain block, the negative terminal of output port of the sixth gain block is connected to the negative terminal of the output port of the seventh gain block, and the negative terminal of output port of the eighth gain block is connected to the negative terminal of the output port of the first gain block.
0020The gain blocks that comprise the push-pull amplifiers used by the present invention may take various configurations, depending on the desired gain, circuit complexity, cost and other factors. In one basic embodiment, each gain block of each push-pull amplifier comprises a single three-terminal active device, such as a CMOS or bipolar transistor, having a cathode, an anode, and a control terminal. In another embodiment, each gain block of each push-pull amplifier comprises a compound device having at least a first and a last three-terminal active device. The active devices of each gain block are connected together in a cascoded fashion such that the cathode of the first active device serves as the negative terminal of the output port of each gain block, the anode of the last active device serves as the positive terminal of the output port of each gain block, and the control terminal of the first active device is the input port of the gain block. With this configuration, each push-pull amplifier, and thus the power amplifier, can advantageously supply more gain than can a single transistor per gain block design.
0021The power amplifier of the present invention enables the push-pull amplifiers to be monolithically integrated onto a single chip. Moreover, the inductive path of each push-pull amplifier may simply be a metal slab and more particularly a substantially straight metal slab.
0022In yet further improvements to the design of the present invention, the power amplifier may further include a resonant, harmonic tuning capacitor that is connected between the positive terminals of the output ports of adjacent gain blocks of adjacent push-pull amplifiers. The amplifier may also include an inductive loop disposed between the input ports of adjacent gain blocks of adjacent push-pull amplifiers in order to tune the impedance presented to the RF input signal.
0023Turning to the RF input side, in order for the circuit to operate properly, a balanced input must be provided to all input ports of all gain blocks. To address this, an input power splitting network is included that symmetrically connects an in-phase balanced input signal to be amplified to the input ports of all gain blocks. The input power splitting network may symmetrically connect the in-phase balanced input signal from a point inside the circular geometry of the power amplifier or from points outside the circular geometry of the power amplifier.
0024In the preferred embodiment, the power amplifier further includes a power-combining circuit connected to the push-pull amplifiers that combines the signals amplified by each of the push-pull amplifiers. In order to achieve power-combining, the push-pull amplifiers are preferably configured as a first closed loop to form a circular geometry primary winding of an active transformer and the power-combining circuit is configured as a secondary winding of the active transformer that is located in proximity with and magnetically coupled to the primary winding. Thus, the secondary winding has a single output that provides the summed outputs of the push-pull amplifiers in the closed first loop. The secondary winding may be a single turn circuit or multiple turn circuit.
0025Furthermore, the secondary winding may advantageously comprise a single or multiple turn inductors formed by a variable width metal line. The metal line has sections that are relatively wide where a low ac voltage is present relative to the substrate and relatively narrow where a high ac voltage relative to the substrate is present. This geometry offers the advantage of further reducing the power loss, as it takes advantage of low metal resistance of wider metal where the ac voltage signal is low, thus reducing the loss and takes advantage of low capacitive coupling to the substrate of a narrower metal where the ac voltage is high, thus again reducing the loss. In this fashion, both the metal resistance loss and capacitive coupling loss are reduced
0026Turning momentarily back to the input circuit, the input power splitting network disclosed above may advantageously comprise a plurality of twisted input loops in proximity with the secondary winding, thereby providing magnetic coupling from the secondary winding. This geometry offers the advantage of further enhancing the gain or linearity of each push-pull amplifier in the power amplifier.
0027In yet a more detailed aspect of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, an additional secondary winding in proximity with and magnetically coupled to the primary and secondary windings may be provided to create an interdigitated transformer with its attendant benefits of lower power loss. Alternatively, or in addition to the multiple secondary winding improvement, the power amplifier of the present invention may further include at least one additional circular geometry primary winding in proximity with and magnetically coupled to the primary and secondary windings to create an interdigitated transformer.
0028A method of combining the amplified outputs of a plurality of push-pull amplifiers to form a power amplifier is also disclosed. In this method, each amplifier includes two inductively-gain blocks interconnected by an inductive path. The method comprises configuring the plurality of amplifiers to form a first closed loop such that adjacent gain blocks of adjacent amplifiers are interconnected and as so interconnected, form virtual ac grounds at their junctions, and driving adjacent gain blocks of adjacent push-pull amplifiers with at least substantially equal and opposite input signals. In a more detailed aspect of the present invention, the method further includes combining the output power of the push-pull amplifiers in the first closed loop in a secondary coil that is located in proximity with and magnetically coupled to the first closed loop.
0029A low loss inductor for deposition on a substrate of an integrated circuit that processes voltage signals is also described. The inductor includes an elongated conductive body deposed on the substrate and having first and second ends, conductive sections disposed between the ends, and an average ac signal voltage across the body, such that a section where the signal voltage is determined to be lower than the average ac signal voltage across the body is relatively wider than another section of the inductor whereat the signal voltage is determined to be higher than the average ac signal voltage across the body.
0030Additionally described is a method for reducing the electrical losses of an inductor deposed on a substrate of an integrated circuit, the inductor have an elongated body with interconnected conducting sections, an average width and an average ac signal voltage across the body. The method includes decreasing the width of a section of the body of the inductor relative to the average width whereat the ac voltage signal on the section is relatively higher than the average ac signal voltage across the inductor body; and increasing the width of another section of the body of the inductor whereat the ac voltage signal on the other section is relatively lower than the average ac signal voltage across the inductor body.
0031Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0032<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a </i>is an illustrative diagram of a push-pull amplifier comprising a pair of gain blocks used as the basic building block for the present invention;
0033<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b </i>is a diagram of one embodiment of the push-pull amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a</i>, wherein the gain blocks are single transistors interconnected by an inductive path;
0034<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>c </i>is a circuit equivalent of the push-pull amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b; </i>
0035<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>d </i>is a circuit diagram of a second embodiment of the push-pull amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a</i>, wherein each gain block comprises multiple transistors cascoded together;
0036<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>a </i>is a high level schematic of one embodiment of the distributed, power-combining amplifier structure of the present invention, wherein four push-pull amplifiers of the type shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a </i>are interconnected at adjacent negative terminals of the outputs of adjacent amplifiers in a “circular geometry”;
0037<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b </i>is a schematic of one embodiment of the distributed, power-combining amplifier structure of the present invention, wherein four push-pull amplifiers of the type shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b </i>are interconnected at adjacent cathodes in a “circular geometry”;
0038<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a </i>is a schematic of an improvement to the distributed amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b</i>, wherein a one turn conducting coil for impedance transformation is bounded by the four push-pull amplifier structure and a resonant capacitor is connected between the anodes of the adjacent transistor pairs;
0039<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>b </i>is an illustrative diagram of an improvement to the distributed amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a</i>, wherein a one turn conducting coil for impedance transformation with variable width is bounded by the four push-pull amplifier structure and a resonant capacitor is connected between the anodes of the adjacent transistor pairs;
0040<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is an illustrative diagram of an improvement to the distributed amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> showing one representative corner of the quad push-pull amplifier design wherein a single loop inductor interconnects the control electrodes of adjacent transistors;
0041<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is an illustrative diagram of the integrated circular geometry power amplifier of the present invention showing the novel input circuit and connection geometry of the input signal to each active device;
0042<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> is a top view of an illustrative diagram of the quad-push-pull active transformer power amplifier of the present invention showing an improved input connection geometry wherein positive feedback is supplied to the active devices;
0043<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>a </i>illustrates yet a further improvement to the quad-push-pull active transformer power amplifier of the present invention wherein the input coil of the active transformer is interdigitated with the output coil;
0044<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>b </i>illustrates an alternative interdigitation scheme to that shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>a</i>, wherein multiple secondary loops are interdigitated with multiple primary loops.
0045<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref> is an electrical schematic of the quad push-pull circular geometry amplifier of the present invention with a signal input circuit shown;
0046<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref> is a graph showing the gain and power-added efficiency (PAE) versus output power of a fabricated 2.2 W, 2.4 GHz, single stage fully-integrated power amplifier designed according to the present invention when powered with a 2 volt supply; and
0047<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> is a graph showing the gain and PAE versus output power of a fabricated 2.2 W, 2.4 GHz, single stage fully-integrated power amplifier designed according to the present invention when powered with a 1 volt supply
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
0048The present invention improves the performance and efficiency of high-frequency power amplifiers, especially for those used in modem communications devices and systems.
0049The present invention discloses novel combinations of three-terminal active devices used as amplifiers or switches or used as components of amplifiers or switches. The term “gain block” is used herein to generically describe any component or combination of components that is capable of providing gain. Thus, a gain block may include a single three-terminal active device, such as a transistor, or a combination thereof. The three terminals of an active device are herein referred to as the “control terminal,” the “anode”, and the “cathode,” corresponding, for example, to the gate, g, drain, d, and source, s, of a FET transistor, respectively, and corresponding to the base, collector, and emitter of a BJT transistor. Thus, these terms are to be understood in their broadest senses. Accordingly, the embodiments described and shown hereinbelow that employ FET transistors are merely illustrative and are by no means intended to limit the invention.
0050The design evolution leading to the preferred embodiments of the present invention is now described.
0051A) Push-Pull Driver
0052<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a </i>shows a high level conceptual schematic of a basic push-pull amplifier design <b>1</b>, which is used as the main building block of the distributed power amplifier of the present invention. The amplifier comprises a first gain block <b>2</b>, having an input port <b>3</b> with positive and negative terminals and an output port <b>4</b> with positive and negative terminals, and a second gain block <b>6</b> having an input port <b>7</b> with positive and negative terminals and an output port <b>8</b> with positive and negative terminals. The amplifiers are connected together at their respective positive terminals of their outputs via an inductive path <b>9</b>. As denoted by the “+” sign at input port <b>3</b> and the “−” sign at input port <b>7</b>, the feature that makes this design a “push-pull” amplifier is that the input port <b>3</b> of gain block <b>2</b> and the input port <b>7</b> of gain block <b>6</b> are driven differentially, i.e., by equal amplitude, but opposite phase, RF signals. This topology creates a “virtual ac ground” near the center <b>5</b> of the inductive path <b>9</b> which, as shown, can be used as a point to supply dc bias V<sub>dd </sub>if desired, thereby reducing the filtering requirements on the supply.
0053<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b </i>shows one specific implementation of the push-pull amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a</i>. In this implementation, each gain block is simply a single three-terminal active device, shown here as a FET transistor. In particular, the amplifier comprises a first transistor <b>12</b> having a control terminal (gate) <b>14</b>, an anode (drain) <b>16</b> and a cathode (source) <b>18</b> and a second transistor <b>22</b> having a control terminal (gate) <b>24</b>, an anode (drain) <b>26</b> and a cathode (source) <b>28</b>. The anodes <b>16</b> and <b>26</b> are interconnected by a metal slab <b>20</b> and biased with a common dc drain voltage V<sub>dd </sub><b>29</b>. As seen in the electrical equivalent drawing of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>c</i>, the metal slab <b>20</b> acts as a drain tuning inductor <b>20</b>′ to resonate transistor parasitic capacitance and control harmonic signals. As discussed below, the slab can also act as, or as part of, a primary circuit of a distributed active transformer. As the inputs are differentially driven, this topology creates a virtual ac ground at the V<sub>dd </sub>supply node <b>21</b> (which is approximately, but not necessarily, at the midpoint of the metal slab <b>20</b>) for the fundamental frequency and odd harmonics of the drain voltage. This virtual ground is an important feature of the push-pull driver, making it unnecessary to use a separate choke inductor and/or a large on-chip bypass capacitor at the supply.
0054The push-pull amplifier shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b </i>is used as the main building block for one preferred embodiment of the circular-geometry active-transformer power amplifier developed and shown below. However, it should be clearly understood that the push-pull amplifier used in the present invention is not limited to the single transistor pair shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b</i>. Fundamentally, the topology of the present invention encompasses any appropriately interconnected gain block pair driven as a push-pull amplifier. For example, each gain block, <b>2</b> and <b>6</b>, shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a </i>could comprise a compound active device architecture to achieve higher gain than the single transistor pair.
0055One such preferred embodiment is the cascode design wherein two or more active devices are cascoded together to create even higher gain push-pull amplifiers. In particular, in the cascoded gain block <b>30</b> shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>d</i>, the cathode <b>33</b> of the first, common-cathode active device <b>32</b> serves as the negative terminal of the output port of the gain block, the anode <b>38</b> of the last cascode-connected active device <b>38</b> serves as the positive terminal of the output port of the gain block, and the control terminal <b>34</b> of the first, common-cathode device <b>32</b> is the positive input of the gain block. As further shown, one or more additional active devices may be connected between the first and last active devices to even further increase the gain of the gain block.
0056It will be understood that other known compound, active devices, such as the Darlington transistor pair, may be used as the gain blocks implemented by the present invention.
0057B) Quad-Push-Pull Circular Geometry
0058In one preferred embodiment, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>a</i>, the “circular geometry” amplifier includes four push-pull amplifiers <b>40</b>, <b>60</b>, <b>80</b> and <b>100</b>, totaling eight gain blocks of the type shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a</i>. As seen, the device is arranged such that gain blocks of adjacent amplifiers are interconnected at the negative terminals of their respective output ports to form a closed loop. Thus, as seen at one corner, the negative terminal of output port of gain block <b>50</b> of amplifier <b>40</b> is connected to the negative terminal of the output port of gain block <b>70</b> of amplifier <b>60</b>.
0059<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b </i>shows one implementation of the amplifier of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>a</i>, whereby each push-pull amplifier of the type shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>a </i>is the simple two-transistor push-pull amplifier of the type shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref><i>b </i>and forms one side of a square. The strategic positioning of the four push-pull amplifiers <b>40</b>′, <b>60</b>′, <b>80</b>′ and <b>100</b>′ enables the use of four straight and wide metal lines <b>42</b>′, <b>62</b>′, <b>82</b>′, and <b>102</b>′, respectively, as the drain inductors. A slab inductor exhibits a higher quality factor, e.g. Q˜20 to 30, than a spiral inductor with a Q˜5 to 10, and hence will lower the power losses in the passive network. As seen, the slab inductors also provide inherently low resistance paths for the dc current to flow from the supply to the drains of the transistors.
0060At the corners, the sources of adjacent transistors of adjacent amplifiers are connected together and also share a common ground. As shown by the “+” and “−” symbols, at each corner the two adjacent transistors are driven in opposite phases. For example, cathode (source) <b>58</b> of transistor <b>50</b>′ of push-pull amplifier <b>40</b>′ and cathode (source) <b>72</b> of transistor <b>70</b>′ of amplifier <b>60</b>′ are interconnected and also connected to ground, labeled GND. Further, when the control terminal (gate) <b>56</b> of transistor <b>50</b>′ of push-pull amplifier <b>40</b>′ is driven by a positive phase signal, the control terminal (gate) <b>71</b> of transistor <b>70</b>′ of push-pull amplifier <b>60</b>′ is driven by the negative phase signal. In this way, a virtual ac ground is created in each corner of the square. This is a significant feature of the circular geometry, as the fundamental and odd harmonics of the ac signal will not leave the loop comprising the four metal slabs as shown by the current loop in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b</i>. Thus, any connection from this square to the supply voltage or ground will not carry any ac signals at the fundamental frequency or its odd harmonics. This practically limits the loss in the supply connection to dc ohmic loss of the connecting line, which can be easily minimized using wider metal line. Further, a very small or even no capacitor is required to filter the supply. It is noteworthy that the topology of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2</figref><i>a </i>and <b>2</b><i>b </i>does not form a virtual ground at the supply and ground nodes for the even harmonics. Thus, the transistors see relatively high impedance at the even harmonics compared to the fundamental and the odd harmonics. These adjacent transistors also share a common supply.
0061It should be understood that the four (4) push-pull amplifier design shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2</figref><i>a </i>and <b>2</b><i>b </i>and carried through the remaining figures, is but one example of the circular geometry topology of the present invention. The topology of the present invention includes at a minimum two (2) push-pull amplifiers interconnected and driven as described above, each push-pull pair comprising two (2) gain blocks. Increasing the number of interconnected push-pull pairs has two advantageous effects. First, the overall circuit output power capacity obviously increases with an increasing number of push-pull amplifiers. Second, the circuit increasingly takes on a circular shape. This is desirable because the topology increases in efficiency the more closely the circuit approaches the shape of a true circle.
0062This topology creates a distributed amplifier having individual radiating RF power outputs. In the embodiments described in section “D” below, the power outputs are combined to provide a single output that is essentially the sum of the individual outputs and that has a far greater efficiency than is conventionally obtainable. However, it should be understood that these outputs may or may not be electro-magnetically combined, depending on the application. For example, the outputs may simply radiate in free space or drive independent loads.
0063C) Impedance and Harmonic Control
0064Providing the correct impedances to the power amplifier is crucial for correct operation. All amplifiers will need to present the correct impedance to the transistor at the fundamental frequency, and controlling the higher order harmonic content of the signal inside the amplifier plays a major role in the performance of a switching amplifier. As depicted in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 3</figref><i>a </i>and <b>3</b><i>b</i>, these functions can be achieved by connecting four capacitors <b>110</b>, <b>120</b>, <b>130</b> and <b>140</b> between the drains of the adjacent transistors, one in each corner of the square. These capacitors assist in controlling the impedance seen by the transistors at the fundamental frequency, decrease the levels of the overtones at the output, and assist in providing to the transistors suitable impedances for use as a switching amplifier. Because of the inductor used in the basic push/pull circuit, unless appropriate measures are taken, the impedance presented to the transistors at the fundamental frequency will be significantly inductive. By placing these capacitors in parallel with the inductance, the impedance may be varied appropriately for the class of operation to be used. For instance, class-A operation would normally size the capacitor so that the impedance at the fundamental is purely resistive. The second benefit of the capacitors is that their low impedance at the harmonic overtones will aid in filtering these frequencies from the output signal, reducing the need for additional post-amplifier filtering. The third benefit, which is applicable when operated as a high-efficiency switching amplifier, is that the placement of this capacitor allows harmonic tuning appropriate for E/F operation to be achieved. Since they are connected between the drains of the two transistors, they will only affect fundamental and odd harmonics since the even harmonic voltages are equal in magnitude and phase on both terminals of the capacitors. Thus, these capacitors are used to obtain the desired inductive impedance at the fundamental frequency, and provide very low impedances at odd harmonics, while maintaining high impedances for even harmonics. This selective impedance control allows each push-pull amplifier to be driven as a power efficient switching amplifier operating in class “inverse F,” or in a group of classes called “class E/F”, which includes, for example, class-E/F<sub>3</sub>, and class-E/F<sub>odd</sub>. This topology can also be used in many other amplifier classes, such as linear class-A, AB, B, and C or non-linear amplifier classes by adjusting the drain inductance and corner capacitance to resonate the transistor drain-bulk capacitance, thereby providing the appropriate load for these classes.
0065D) Output Power Combining
0066In the preferred embodiment, the quad-push-pull amplifier design shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b</i>, with its four relatively large slab inductors that creates the square geometry, is used as the primary circuit of a magnetically coupled active transformer to combine the output power of these four push-pull amplifiers and to match their small drain impedance to a typically 50Ω unbalanced or balanced load. The ability to drive an unbalanced load is essential to avoid an external balun for driving commonly used single-ended antennas, transmission lines, filters and RF switches. As seen in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b</i>, these four push-pull amplifiers driven by alternating phases generate a uniform circular current at the fundamental frequency around the square resulting in a strong magnetic flux through the square.
0067As seen in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a</i>, a one-turn metal coil <b>150</b> inside this primary coil power amplifier square can be used to harness this alternating magnetic flux and act as the transformer secondary loop. It also provides an impedance transformation ratio of 8:1 to present impedance of approximately 6.25Ω (50Ω/8) to the drains of the transistors. Ignoring these losses, for a ±2V drain voltage swing in the linear mode of operation, this transformation and combining process raises the potential output power of the amplifier to a 50Ω load from P<sub>out</sub>≈V<sub>dd</sub><sup>2</sup>/(2×R<sub>out</sub>)=2<sup>2</sup>/(2×50Ω)=40 mW to P<sub>out</sub>≈8×V<sub>dd</sub><sup>2</sup>/(2×R<sub>out</sub>/8)=8×2V<sup>2</sup>/(2×50/8)=2.56 W. As the transformer-coupling factor, k, is lower than I (typically around k=0.6-0.8) a capacitor, <b>204</b> is connected in parallel to the output (see <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref>) to compensate for the leakage inductance of the transformer.
0068In a variation to the secondary winding <b>150</b> shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a</i>, the secondary winding may advantageously comprise a variable width metal line. Conceptually, the metal line has sections that are relatively wide where a low ac voltage is present relative to the substrate upon which the metal line is deposed, and relatively narrow where a high ac voltage relative to the substrate is present. This geometry offers the advantage of further reducing the power loss, as it takes advantage of the lower metal resistance of wider metal where the ac voltage signal is low (relative to the substrate), thus reducing the loss and takes advantage of low capacitive coupling to the substrate of a narrower metal where the ac voltage is high (relative to the substrate), thus again reducing the loss. In this fashion, both the metal resistance loss and capacitive coupling loss are reduced.
0069Thus, for example, as seen in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>b</i>, a variable metal width one turn square coil inside the primary coil is used to harness the alternating magnetic flux and act as the transformer secondary loop, which further improves the efficiency of the device. In particular, viewing counterclockwise from the output, straight sections <b>150</b><i>a</i>-<b>150</b><i>e </i>of the relatively square secondary coil become progressively wider, thereby creating an unbalanced single turn square inductor. The average width of the inductor along the entire path may be the same as in nonvariable secondary loop case shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a</i>, thus keeping the same total conductor resistance while reducing the overall loss. Alternative geometries that provide reduced losses over inductors without varying widths are possible for this and other integrate circuit applications, such as a multiple turn square spiral, multiple turn circular spiral, a line inductor with graduating steps, a tapered line inductor and a meandering line inductor.
0070Turning back to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a</i>, due to the symmetry of the push-pull topology, the even harmonics are significantly rejected and are thus effectively not coupled to the secondary <b>150</b>. Also the transistor drain to bulk capacitance and the corner capacitors will practically short-circuit all odd harmonics except the fundamental frequency signal, thus attenuating odd harmonics at the output.
0071The circular-geometry active-transformer topology of the present invention provides another benefit over the design of conventional harmonically-controlled amplifier classes (e.g., class F, inverse class F). Unlike these single-ended harmonically-controlled amplifier classes that require individual adjustments for each harmonic, this topology only requires adjustment at the fundamental frequency during the design process in order to realize class E/F designs. Once the fundamental frequency is set, all other harmonics will see the desired impedances automatically. This is because the E/F mode of operation can be achieved by presenting low impedances at selected odd harmonics, a capacitive impedance 1/(jωC<sub>s</sub>) at the even harmonics, and a load impedance at the fundamental which is has an appropriate amount of inductance. The low impedances at odd harmonics is achieved using the relatively large tuning capacitors <b>110</b>, <b>120</b>, <b>130</b> and <b>140</b>, which are effectively in parallel with the transistor drains at the odd harmonics. At the even harmonics, however, the transistors only “see” their own output capacitance. This is because each transistor has the same signal amplitude and phase at these frequencies and so all of the other components in the circuit which are connected between the transistors will conduct no current at these harmonics, making them have no effect on the impedance. The inductive fundamental impedance is achieved by tuning the parallel RLC circuit connected between the transistor drains to resonate at a slightly higher frequency than the fundamental. By varying this tuning, the inductance of the load at the fundamental frequency may be varied to achieve zero-voltage-switching conditions resulting in high efficiency operation. Thus by utilizing the circuit symmetry to separate the even and odd harmonics, the circuit provides low impedances at the odd harmonics, capacitive impedance at the even harmonics, and an the appropriate inductive load in such a way so that only the fundamental frequency impedance need be tuned carefully.
0072E) Input Power Splitting and Matching
0073Turning now to the input signal, in the quad-push-pull design shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2</figref><i>a</i>, <b>2</b><i>b </i>and <b>3</b>, a typical 50Ω unbalanced input must be matched and transformed into four balanced drive signals at the eight (8) gates, resulting in similar challenges as those described with respect to the output network. To address this, a gate-matching inductive loop is connected between the gates at each corner of the square, for a total of four (4) loops, in order to resonate the gate capacitance at the fundamental frequency. One such corner is shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, wherein an inductive loop <b>180</b> is connected between the gates <b>162</b> and <b>172</b> of transistors <b>160</b> and <b>170</b>, respectively, and is shown schematically as an inductor <b>180</b>′. The single, differentially driven loop inductor exhibits better Q (10-15) than normal spiral inductors. The middle points of these inductive loops form virtual ac grounds that make it unnecessary to use a large capacitor to ac ground this point, while blocking the dc voltage.
0074As seen in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref>, the input power splitting network consists of three parts, namely: (1) a 1:1 input spiral transformer balun <b>190</b>; (2) the connecting differential lines <b>192</b><i>a</i>, <b>192</b><i>b</i>, that brings the balanced signal to a center point <b>195</b> of the square; and (3) the splitting network <b>194</b> symmetrically connecting the center point <b>195</b> to the gates of all transistors. Thus, the splitting network <b>194</b> provides in-phase balanced input signals to the gates of each push-pull pair transistor. In one preferred embodiment, illustratively shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref>, the splitting network <b>194</b> comprises carefully shaped metal lines <b>194</b><i>a</i>-<b>194</b><i>f </i>that take predetermined twisted paths to the transistors. This provides positive magnetic coupling from the output transformer (secondary coil) <b>196</b> to each input connection, thereby further enhancing the gain of each individual amplifier and thus the entire amplifier.
0075A parallel capacitor <b>205</b> (shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref>) and series capacitors <b>206</b>, <b>207</b><i>a</i>, and <b>207</b><i>b </i>are also inserted at the input to resonate the leakage inductance and provide matching to 50Ω at the input side of the spiral 1:1 on-chip balun <b>190</b>. It is noted that none of the bonding wires are used as inductors making it unnecessary to fine tune their value for optimum operation.
0076The input feeding can alternatively be made from the outside of the loop, thus reducing the power loss caused by currents induced in the metal lines due to magnetic coupling from the output.
0077F) Interdigitation
0078A further improvement to the active-transformer power amplifier of the present invention is shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>a</i>. In a high frequency planar active transformer of the type discussed herein, the current in the primary loop <b>200</b> tends to concentrate at the edges of their metal conductors facing the secondary circuit <b>204</b>. Moreover, the current in the secondary circuit also concentrates at the edges of its conductor facing the primary winding. This “current crowding” increases the losses in the relatively wide metal conductors because the conductors are effectively being used as relatively narrow conductors having higher resistances.
0079In order to reduce these losses, the primary circuit may include a second loop <b>202</b> placed on the inside track of the secondary, or output loop <b>204</b>, thereby “interdigitating” the coils. In this way, the current in the primary is split, or distributed, between the edges of the pair of input loops <b>200</b> and <b>202</b>, effectively doubling the number of edges through which the current flows. This results in an effective lower overall metal resistance and hence lowers overall loss. It should be understood that the secondary loops may or may not be connected together. Alternative interdigitation schemes are also possible. One such scheme is shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>b</i>, wherein multiple secondary loops are interdigitated with multiple primary loops.
0080G) Experimental Results
0081As stated above, the new circular geometry topology of the present invention can be used to implement both linear and switching power amplifiers. As a demonstration of the concepts of the present invention, a 2.2-W, 2.4-GHz single-stage fully-integrated circular-geometry switching power amplifier in class E/F<sub>3 </sub>was fabricated and measured using 0.35 μm CMOS transistors in a BiCMOS process technology.
0082The process implemented three metal layers, the top one being 3 μm thick with a distance of 4.3 μm from the substrate, the substrate having a resistivity of 8 Ω·cm. The chip area is 1.3 mm×2.0 mm including pads. Quasi-3D electromagnetic simulation using SONNET and circuit simulation using ADS was performed on the complete structure as a part of the design cycle to verify performance of the amplifier.
0083The complete electrical diagram of the designed circuit is shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref>. The electrical components in general correspond to the physical components illustratively shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2-5</figref>. In particular, the four push pull amplifiers <b>40</b>′, <b>60</b>′, <b>80</b>′ and <b>100</b>′ that comprise the primary coil of the active transformer shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b </i>are illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref> as drain inductors L<sub>d </sub>with a transistor at each end that are driven in opposite phase from each other. The transistor input matching loop <b>180</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is represented as gate inductors L<sub>g </sub><b>180</b>′ and <b>180</b>″ and is repeated at each corner of the square. The square secondary coil <b>150</b> shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 3-5</figref> is represented by four serially connected secondary coils of the transformer <b>151</b>, <b>152</b>, <b>153</b> and <b>154</b> that match each of the four primary coils that are part of push-pull amplifiers <b>40</b>′ <b>60</b>′, <b>80</b>′, and <b>100</b>′, respectively. The input matching transformer or balun <b>190</b> is shown as transformer T<b>1</b>, <b>190</b>′. As indicated in the schematic (the physical connection not explicitly shown), the transformed, balanced input signal has a positive input <b>210</b> and a negative input <b>212</b> that is split to the correspondingly labeled inputs of the amplifier. Specifically, the positive input <b>210</b> is connected to the “+” phase gates of the appropriate transistor of each push pull amplifier and the “−” phase input <b>212</b> is connected to the “−” phase gates of the appropriate transistor of each push pull amplifier. The prototype also implemented the twisted input loop design shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> for the input power splitting.
0084In measuring the performance of the design, the chip was glued directly to a gold plated brass heat sink using conductive adhesive to allow sufficient thermal dissipation. The chip ground pads were wire bonded to the heat sink. The input and output were wire bonded to 50Ω microstrip lines on a printed circuit board (PCB). The supply and gate bias pads were also wire bonded. The input was driven using a commercial power amplifier connected to the circuit input through a directional coupler to measure the input return loss. The output was connected to a power meter through a 20 dB attenuator and 2.9 GHz low pass filter to avoid measuring harmonic signal powers. All system power losses were calibrated out, including the connector and Duroid board losses. The bond wire power loss was included in the amplifier's measured performance.
0085An output power of 2.2 W at 2.4 GHz was obtained with 8.5 dB gain using a 2V power supply. The corresponding power added efficiency (PAE) was 31% and the drain efficiency was 36%. When the output was taken differentially, a PAE of 41% was achieved with P<sub>out </sub>of 1.9 W, gain of 8.7 dB and drain efficiency of 48%. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 8 and 9</figref> show the gain and PAE vs. output power for 2V and IV supplies, respectively. Small signal gain was 14 dB and the input reflection coefficient was −9 dB. The 3 dB bandwidth was 510 MHz centered at 2.44 GHz. All harmonics up to 20 GHz were more than 64 dB below the fundamental. This chip demonstrated the viability and performance enhancements of the monolithic design of the present invention compared to conventional designs.
0086The present invention defines a technique for monolithically combining the output power of active devices. Having thus described exemplary embodiments of the invention, it will be apparent that further alterations, modifications, and improvements will also occur to those skilled in the art. Further, it will be apparent that the present invention is not limited to CMOS technology, to any specific frequency range, to any specific output power levels, to any specific number of active devices, to any class of operation or harmonic tuning strategy. Accordingly, the invention is defined only by the following claims.
Contents5
14 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12 Sheet 13 Sheet 14
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US7936215B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7880547B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8134408B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US12132455B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10181828B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8049564B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2013048891A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US10103695B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2022231642A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10547278B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8779855B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2010164628A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010033252A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10581388B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7812701B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009322427A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8044759B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10135405B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8502598B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2012133431A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8629737B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8125276B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010148869A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7724083B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8536948B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7746174B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009184786A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010148866A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9824165B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8330544B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8461927B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10148233B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2011221522A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7705684B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011043316A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2015100934A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9032355B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009309662A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| EP0379202A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| EP0556398A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| DE1276764B | Cites | Germany | Applicant |
| FR1413073A | Cites | France | Applicant |
| US3098200A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3157839A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4117415A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4283685A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4305043A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5066925A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5130664A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5208725A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5223800A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5698469A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US5920240A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5939766A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6057571A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6121842A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6121843A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6160455A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6211728B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6383858B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6385033B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6417535B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6448847B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO9702654A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| DE1276764B | Cites | Germany | Third party observation |
| EP379202A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Third party observation |
| EP556398A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Third party observation |
| FR1413073A | Cites | France | Third party observation |
| WO9702654 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Third party observation |
| Search Report for PCT/US01/31813 dated Jun. 17, 2003 in PCT filing from parent U.S. Appl. No. 09/974,578. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Robertson et al., "Solid State Power Amplifier Using Impedance-Transforming Brach-Line Couplers for L-Band Satellite Systems," Proceedings of the 23<SUP>rd </SUP>European Microwave Conference, Madrid, Sep. 6-9, 1993, Proceedings of the European Microwave Conference, Tumbridge Wells, Reed Exhibition Company, GB, Sep. 6, 1993, pp. 448-450, XP00629961, ISBN: 0-946821-23-2 Figures 1, 3. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Long et al., "The Modeling, Characterization and Design of Monolithic Inductors for Silicon RF IC's," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 357-369, Mar. 1997. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Portilla et al., "High Power-Added Efficiency MMIC Amplifier for 2.4 GHz Wireless Communications," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| King-Chun Tsai et al., "A 1.9-GHz, 1-W CMOS Class-E Power Amplifier for Wireless Communications," IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 7,, pp. 962-970, Jul. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Simbürger et al., A Monolithic Transformer Coupled 5-W Silicon Power Amplifier with 59% PAE at 0.9 GHz, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 1881-1892, Dec. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Simbürger et al., "A Monolithic 2.5 V, 1 W Silicon Bipolar Power Amplifier With 55% PAE at 1.9 GHz," IEEE MTT-S Digest, pp. 853-856, 2000. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Yoo et al., "A Common-Gate Switched, 0.9W Class-E Power Amplifier with 41% PAE in 0.25 mum CMOS," Integrated Systems Laboratory (IIS), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich Switzerland, 2000 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 56 & 57, 2000. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Long, "Monolithic Transformers for Silicon RF IC Design," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1368-1382, Sep. 2000. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Tan et al., "A 900 MHz Fully-Integrated SOI Power Amplifier for Single-Chip Wireless Transceiver Applications," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 1481-1486, Oct. 2000. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Gupta et al., "Design and Optimization of CMOS RF Power Amplifiers," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 166-175, Feb. 2001. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Aoki et al., "A 2-4-GHz, 2.2-W, 2-V Fully-Integrated CMOS Circular-Geometry Active-Transformer Power Amplifier," Submitted to CICC-IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, San Diego, May 6-9, 2001, Department of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA May 6-Sep. 2001. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Kee et al., "7-MHz, 1.1-kW Demonstration of the New-E/F<SUB>2.odd </SUB>Switching Amplifier Class," Department of Electrical Engineer, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 92115, 2001. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Translation of Japanese Office Action (Notice of Reasons for Refusal) mailed Dec. 11, 2007 (4 pgs.). | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Patent Abstracts of Japan for Publication No. 06-224605, published Aug. 12, 1994 (1 pg.). | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Patent Abstracts of Japan for Publication No. 10-190371, published Jul. 21, 1998 (related to Japanese Patent 2917949) (1 pg.). | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| Search Report for PCT/US01/31813 dated Jun. 17, 2003 in PCT filing from parent U.S. Appl. No. 09/974,578. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Robertson et al., “Solid State Power Amplifier Using Impedance-Transforming Brach-Line Couplers for L-Band Satellite Systems,” Proceedings of the 23<sup>rd </sup>European Microwave Conference, Madrid, Sep. 6-9, 1993, Proceedings of the European Microwave Conference, Tumbridge Wells, Reed Exhibition Company, GB, Sep. 6, 1993, pp. 448-450, XP00629961, ISBN: 0-946821-23-2 Figures 1, 3. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Long et al., “The Modeling, Characterization and Design of Monolithic Inductors for Silicon RF IC's,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 357-369, Mar. 1997. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Portilla et al., “High Power-Added Efficiency MMIC Amplifier for 2.4 GHz Wireless Communications,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| King-Chun Tsai et al., “A 1.9-GHz, 1-W CMOS Class-E Power Amplifier for Wireless Communications,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 7,, pp. 962-970, Jul. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Simbürger et al., A Monolithic Transformer Coupled 5-W Silicon Power Amplifier with 59% PAE at 0.9 GHz, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, No. 12, pp. 1881-1892, Dec. 1999. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Simbürger et al., “A Monolithic 2.5 V, 1 W Silicon Bipolar Power Amplifier With 55% PAE at 1.9 GHz,” IEEE MTT-S Digest, pp. 853-856, 2000. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Yoo et al., “A Common-Gate Switched, 0.9W Class-E Power Amplifier with 41% PAE in 0.25 μm CMOS,” Integrated Systems Laboratory (IIS), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich Switzerland, 2000 Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 56 & 57, 2000. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Long, “Monolithic Transformers for Silicon RF IC Design,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 1368-1382, Sep. 2000. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Tan et al., “A 900 MHz Fully-Integrated SOI Power Amplifier for Single-Chip Wireless Transceiver Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 1481-1486, Oct. 2000. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Gupta et al., “Design and Optimization of CMOS RF Power Amplifiers,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 166-175, Feb. 2001. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Aoki et al., “A 2-4-GHz, 2.2-W, 2-V Fully-Integrated CMOS Circular-Geometry Active-Transformer Power Amplifier,” Submitted to CICC-IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, San Diego, May 6-9, 2001, Department of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA May 6-Sep. 2001. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Kee et al., “7-MHz, 1.1-kW Demonstration of the New-E/F<sub>2.odd </sub>Switching Amplifier Class,” Department of Electrical Engineer, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 92115, 2001. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Translation of Japanese Office Action (Notice of Reasons for Refusal) mailed Dec. 11, 2007 (4 pgs.). | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| Patent Abstracts of Japan for Publication No. 06-224605, published Aug. 12, 1994 (1 pg.). | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
45 members in 9 offices
Priority claims22
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23947000 | United States of America | P | |
| 23947000 | United States of America | P | |
| 23947400 | United States of America | P | |
| 23947400 | United States of America | P | |
| 28860101 | United States of America | P | |
| 28860101 | United States of America | P | |
| 97457801 | United States of America | A | |
| 97457801 | United States of America | A | |
| 94234804 | United States of America | A | |
| 94234804 | United States of America | A | |
| 48011306 | United States of America | A | |
| 09974578 | – | – | – |
| 10942348 | – | – | – |
| 60239470 | – | – | – |
| 60239474 | – | – | – |
| 60288601 | – | – | – |
| US20000239470P | – | – | – |
| US20000239474P | – | – | – |
| US20010288601P | – | – | – |
| US20010974578 | – | – | – |
| US20040942348 | – | – | – |
| US20060480113 | – | – | – |
Members45
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO0231967A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| AU2436802A | Australia | A | |
| US2002135422A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US2003169113A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| WO03079547A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| AU2003220108A1 | Australia | A1 | |
| AU2003220108A8 | Australia | A8 | |
| US2003184369A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| KR20030081318A | Republic of Korea | A | |
| WO0231967A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| EP1400012A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| TW200405652A | Taiwan Province of China | A | |
| CN1496605A | China | A | |
| US6737948B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| WO03079547A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| WO03079547B1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | B1 | |
| US6816012B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| EP1485996A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| JP2005503679A | Japan | A | |
| US2005030098A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US6856199B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2005140447A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US7075371B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US7119619B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2006250187A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| CN1294698C | China | C | |
| US2007030071A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US7330076B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| KR100852315B1 | Republic of Korea | B1 | |
| US2008204139A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US7425869B2This record | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2009002071A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| TWI315605B | Taiwan Province of China | B | |
| JP2010011469A | Japan | A | |
| US7733183B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2010244955A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP1400012B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| US8018283B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| AT522979T | Austria | T | |
| ATE522979T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| US8049563B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2012001692A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| JP4933598B2 | Japan | B2 | |
| US8350625B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| EP1485996B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 |
35 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 1 non-final rejection.
- Non-final rejections
- 1
- Final rejections
- 0
- RCEs
- 0
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large EntityM1553 | M1553 | |
| Entity status set to undiscounted (initial default setting or status change)BIG. | BIG. | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/ | PGM/ | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowedPTAC | PTAC | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR | WPIR | |
| Dispatch to FDCD1935 | D1935 | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS | PILS | |
| Response to Reasons for AllowanceREAS | REAS | |
| Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084 | N084 | |
| Issue Fee Payment ReceivedIFEE | IFEE | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=. | MN/=. | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=. | N/=. | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center CompleteTSSCOMP | TSSCOMP | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Application Return from OIPEWROIPE | WROIPE | |
| Application Return TO OIPEROIPE | ROIPE | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Cleared by L&R (LARS)L128 | L128 | |
| Referred to Level 2 (LARS) by OIPE CSRL198 | L198 | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN | SCAN | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
1 recorded assignment at the USPTO, latest first
- Now
Now: Held by
CALFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY - 2006-06-30
Assignment of assignors interest.
Ownership change- From
- HAJIMIRI SEYED-ALIAOKI ICHIROKEE SCOTT DAVID
and 1 moreShow fewer
RUTLEDGE BAVID B - To
- CALFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Recorded 2006-06-30, Signed 2002-01-10
6 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance fee paymentMAFP | MAFP | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee payment procedurePAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYFEPP | FEPP | |
| Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF | STCF | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 07425869
- Publication, DOCDB
- 7425869
- Publication, EPODOC
- US7425869
- Application
- 11480113
- Application, DOCDB
- 48011306
- Application, EPODOC
- US20060480113
Titles
- English
- Distributed circular geometry power amplifier architecture
Patent term adjustment
- Applicant delay
- −96 days
- Net adjustment
- 0 days
Classification
- CPC, 8
- H03F1/223
- H03F3/26
- H03F3/265
- H03F3/423
- H03F3/604
- H03F2200/534
- H03F2200/537
- H03F2200/541
- IPC, 4
- H03F3 26
- H03F1 22
- H03F3 42
- H03F3 60
- USPC, 2
- 330276000
- 330262000