Device for reflecting electromagnetic radiation
Summary by NHIP
Reflectarray with impedance-matched antennas
The device reflects electromagnetic radiation using an array of elements where each antenna connects to a solid-state transistor. Antenna impedance equals the conjugate of the square root of the transistor's on-state impedance multiplied by its off-state impedance, operating above 20 GHz.
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
A reflectarray utilizes switching devices with non-ideal impedance characteristics to vary the impedance of reflecting elements. The antennas of the reflecting elements are configured as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices to provide optimal phase-amplitude performance. In particular, the antennas are configured such that the impedance of each antenna is proportional to the square root of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices when in an on state and when in an off state.

Term
Term ended
Expired 12 January 2025, 1.7 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
20 claims: 3 independent, 17 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 87, broad(NHIP)A device for reflecting electromagnetic radiation, the device comprising:an array of reflecting elements, each reflecting element comprising: an antenna;and a non-ideal switching device in electrical signal communication with the antenna;wherein the antennas are configured as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices.
- 9A device for reflecting electromagnetic radiation, the device comprising:an array of reflecting elements, each reflecting element comprising: an antenna;and a solid-state transistor in electrical signal communication with the antenna;wherein the antennas are configured as a function of impedance characteristics of the solid-state transistors.
- 18A device for reflecting electromagnetic radiation, the device comprising:an array of reflecting elements, each reflecting element comprising: an antenna;and a non-ideal switching device in electrical signal communication with the antenna;wherein the antennas are configured to have an impedance (Z antenna ) that is conjugate to the square root of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices when in an on state (Z on ) multiplied by the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices when in an off state (Z off ) in order to optimize the phase-amplitude performance of the reflecting elements.
Independent claims3
29 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
0001Microwave and millimeter-wave reflectarrays are antenna arrays in which each antenna is connected to a variable impedance device. If the variable impedance device is a resistive device, ideally it is biased at either short-circuit or open-circuit states or at least at states of very low or very high resistance compared to the antenna impedance. In this way, the antenna and variable impedance device combination acts as a variable-phase reflecting element. With appropriate control signals applied to the variable impedance devices, the reflectarray can be used as an adjustable mirror with the capability of focusing, steering, or splitting a beam of electromagnetic radiation.
0002Diodes have typically been used as the variable impedance devices in reflectarrays although transistors have also been used. Many low cost transistors are able to provide the desired impedance characteristics at relatively low radio frequency ranges (e.g., less than 10 GHz). However, these low cost transistors do not necessarily provide the desired impedance performance characteristics at relatively high radio frequency ranges (e.g., greater than 20 GHz). More expensively packaged transistors as well as more exotic devices, such as ferroelectric capacitors and ferrite switches, are readily able to provide the desired impedance characteristics at the higher frequency ranges, but the number of transistors, capacitors, or switches required for many reflectarray applications combined with the high cost of each packaged device makes reflectarrays with such devices prohibitively expensive.
0003In view of this, what is needed is a reflectarray that exhibits the desired impedance characteristics and that is economical to implement.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
0004A reflectarray utilizes switching devices with non-ideal impedance characteristics to vary the impedance of reflecting elements. The antennas of the reflecting elements are configured as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices to provide optimal phase-amplitude performance. In particular, the antennas are configured such that the impedance of each antenna is proportional to the square root of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices when in an on state and when in an off state. Configuring the antennas as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices enables a reflectarray to achieve switching between 0 and 180 degree phase-amplitude states while utilizing low-cost switching devices, such as surface mount field effect transistors, which exhibit non-ideal impedance characteristics over the operating frequency range of the reflectarray.
0005Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0006<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> depicts an example of a reflectarray for microwave and millimeter-wave applications.
0007<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> depicts a side view of a reflectarray and a horn that provides electromagnetic radiation to the reflectarray.
0008<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> depicts a functional design of one of the individual reflecting elements of the reflectarray from <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, which includes an antenna and a non-ideal switching device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
0009<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> depicts a functional diagram of a reflecting element in which a three-terminal solid-state transistor is used as the non-ideal switching device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
0010<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> depicts a top view of a planar patch antenna.
0011<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> depicts a side view of a reflecting element that utilizes a surface mounted field effect transistor as the non-ideal switching device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
0012<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> depicts a side view of another embodiment of a reflecting element that utilizes a surface mounted field effect transistor as the non-ideal switching device in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
0013Throughout the description similar reference numbers are used to identify similar elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
0014A reflectarray utilizes switching devices with non-ideal impedance characteristics to vary the impedance of reflecting elements. The antennas of the reflecting elements are configured as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices to provide optimal phase-amplitude performance. In particular, the antennas are configured such that the impedance of each antenna is proportional to the square root of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices when in an on state and when in an off state.
0015Reflectarrays are passive systems that reflect externally provided electromagnetic radiation. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> depicts an example of a reflectarray <b>10</b> for microwave and millimeter-wave applications. The reflectarray includes distinct reflecting elements <b>12</b> that reflect electromagnetic radiation with varying phase depending on their impedance state. Ideally, the reflecting elements reflect electromagnetic radiation with a phase shift of 180 degrees when their impedance is high relative to when their impedance is low. The reflecting elements are individually controllable and the reflectarray is typically supported by driver electronics (not shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>). The reflectarray is formed on and/or in a substrate <b>14</b> such as a printed circuit board. In one example, the reflectarray has a surface area of approximately one meter square and is covered with 10,000 to 100,000 individually controllable reflecting elements.
0016Electromagnetic radiation can be provided to the reflectarray from a source such as a horn. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> depicts a side view of a reflectarray <b>10</b> and a horn <b>16</b> that is configured to provide electromagnetic radiation to the reflectarray. Although a horn is shown as the source of the electromagnetic radiation in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref>, other sources of electromagnetic radiation are possible.
0017<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> depicts a functional design of one of the individual reflecting elements <b>12</b> from <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. The reflecting element includes an antenna <b>20</b> and a non-ideal switching device <b>22</b>. The antenna functions to absorb or reflect a beam of electromagnetic radiation to varying degrees depending on the impedance level of the reflecting element. The antenna is represented here as a generic dipole antenna for description purposes although other types of antennas are contemplated. Example antenna types that can be incorporated into a reflectarray include patch, dipole, monopole, loop, and dielectric resonator type antennas. In reflectarray applications, the antennas are often formed in a single plane on the surface of the reflectarray substrate. The antennas have an impedance characteristic that is a function of the antenna design parameters. Design parameters of antennas include but are not limited to, physical attributes such as the dielectric material of construction, the thickness of the dielectric material, shape of the antenna, length and width of the antenna, feed location, and thickness of the antenna metal layer.
0018The non-ideal switching device <b>22</b> changes the impedance state of the reflecting element <b>22</b> by changing its resistive state. A low resistive state (e.g., a closed or “short” circuit) translates to a low impedance. Conversely, a high resistive state (e.g., an open circuit) translates to a high impedance. A switching device with ideal performance characteristics (referred to herein as an “ideal” switching device) produces effectively zero impedance (Z=0) when its resistance is at its lowest state and effectively infinite impedance (Z=∞) when its resistance is at its highest state. As described herein, a switching device is “on” when its impedance is at its lowest state (e.g., Z<sub>on</sub>=0) and “off” when its impedance is at its highest state (e.g., Z<sub>off</sub>=∞). Because the on and off impedance states of an ideal switching device are effectively Z<sub>on</sub>=0 and Z<sub>off</sub>=∞, an ideal switching device is able to provide the maximum phase shift without absorption of electromagnetic radiation between the on and off states. That is, the ideal switching device is able to provide switching between 0 and 180 degree phase states. In the case of an ideal switching device, maximum phase-amplitude performance can be achieved with an antenna that exhibits any finite non-zero impedance.
0019In contrast to an ideal switching device, a “non-ideal” switching device is a switching device that does not exhibit on and off impedance states of Z<sub>on</sub>=0 and Z<sub>off</sub>=∞, respectively. Rather, the on and off impedance states of a non-ideal switching device are somewhere between Z<sub>on</sub>=0 and Z<sub>off</sub>=∞. A non-ideal switching device may exhibit ideal impedance characteristics within certain frequency ranges (e.g., <10 GHz) and highly non-ideal impedance characteristics at other frequency ranges (e.g., >20 GHz).
0020Because the on and off impedance states of a non-ideal switching device are somewhere between Z<sub>on</sub>=0 and Z<sub>off</sub>=∞, the non-ideal switching device does not necessarily provide the maximum phase state performance regardless of the impedance of the corresponding antenna, where maximum phase state performance involves switching between 0 and 180 degree phase states. In accordance with the invention, the antennas of a reflectarray that utilizes non-ideal switching devices are specifically designed to provide optimal phase performance, where the optimal phase state performance of a reflecting element is the point at which the reflecting element is closest to switching between 0 and 180 degree phase-amplitude states. In an embodiment, to achieve optimal phase state performance, the antennas are configured as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices. For example, the antennas are designed such that the impedance of the antennas is a function of impedance characteristics of the non-ideal switching devices. Further, the antennas are configured as a function of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices in the on state, Z<sub>on</sub>, and the impedance of the non-ideal switching device in the off state, Z<sub>off</sub>. In a particular embodiment, the phase state performance of a reflecting element is optimized when the antennas are configured such that the impedance of each antenna is conjugate to the square root of the impedance of the non-ideal switching devices when in the on and off impedance states, Z<sub>on </sub>and Z<sub>off</sub>. Specifically, the impedance of each antenna is the complex conjugate of the geometric mean of the on and off impedance states, Z<sub>on </sub>and Z<sub>off</sub>, of the corresponding non-ideal switching device. This relationship is represented as: <br /><i>Z</i><sub>antenna</sub>*=√{square root over (<i>Z</i><sub>on</sub><i>Z</i><sub>off</sub>)} (1)<br /> The above-described relationship is derived using the well-known formula for the complex reflection coefficient between a source impedance and a load impedance. Choosing the source to be the antenna and the load to be the non-ideal switching device, the on-state reflection coefficient is set to be equal to the opposite of the off-state reflection coefficient to arrive at equation (1).
0021Designing an antenna that exhibits optimal phase-amplitude performance involves determining the on and off impedances, Z<sub>on </sub>and Z<sub>off </sub>of the particular non-ideal switching device that is used in the reflecting elements. Design parameters of the antenna are then manipulated to produce an antenna with an impedance that matches the relationship expressed in equation (1) above. An antenna that satisfies equation (1) can be designed as long as Z<sub>on </sub>and Z<sub>off </sub>are determined to be distinct values.
0022Types of switching devices that exhibit non-ideal impedance characteristics over the frequency band of interest include low cost surface mount devices such as surface mount field effect transistors (FETs) and surface mount diodes. Although surface mount FETs exhibit non-ideal impedance characteristics over the frequency band of interest, they are relatively inexpensive and can be individually packaged for use in reflectarray applications. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> depicts a functional diagram of a reflecting element <b>12</b> in which a three-terminal solid-state transistor is used as the non-ideal switching device <b>22</b>. In particular, the three-terminal solid-state transistor is a FET with a source <b>26</b>, a drain <b>28</b>, and a gate <b>30</b>. The source and drain are connected to opposite terminals of the antenna <b>20</b> and the drain is connected to some driver electronics (not shown). In an embodiment, the source is DC-grounded and the drain is either DC-grounded or floating, depending on the application. For an enhancement-mode FET, the source-drain radio frequency impedance is nominally high when the gate-source voltage V<sub>gs </sub>is zero or negative and low when V<sub>gs </sub>is sufficiently positive. For a depletion-mode FET, the source-drain radio frequency impedance is nominally low when V<sub>gs </sub>is zero or positive and high when V<sub>gs </sub>is sufficiently negative. Although <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 3 and 4</figref> represent functional connections between the antenna and the non-ideal switching device, as is described in detail below, these figures may not exactly represent the physical connections between the antenna and the non-ideal switching device in an actual implementation.
0023In an embodiment, the antennas <b>20</b> in the reflectarray <b>10</b> are planar patch antennas. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> depicts an example of a top view of a planar patch antenna <b>20</b><i>a</i>. The planar patch antenna includes a via connector <b>32</b> that is electrically connected to the drain of a corresponding solid-state transistor. Design criteria of the planar patch antenna that affect the antenna's impedance include, for example, dielectric material of construction, thickness of the dielectric, width of the patch, feed point, and planar metal thickness. In an embodiment, the planar patch antenna is formed by depositing a metal layer (e.g., gold) on the surface of the reflectarray substrate.
0024Scalability and cost of a reflectarray depend critically on packaging and assembly both at the component level and at the system level. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> depicts a side view of a reflecting element <b>12</b> that utilizes a surface mounted FET as the non-ideal switching device. The reflecting element of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> is formed on and in a printed circuit board substrate <b>14</b> and includes the surface mounted FET <b>22</b>, a patch antenna <b>20</b><i>a</i>, a drain via <b>32</b>, a ground plane <b>36</b>, and a source via <b>38</b>. The surface mounted FET is mounted on the opposite side of the printed circuit board substrate as the planar patch antenna and the ground plane is located between the planar patch antenna and the surface mounted FET. The drain via <b>32</b> connects the drain <b>28</b> of the surface mounted FET to the planar patch antenna <b>20</b><i>a </i>and the source via <b>38</b> connects the source <b>26</b> of the surface mounted FET <b>22</b> to the ground plane <b>36</b>. In one embodiment, the surface mounted FETs are placed on the printed circuit board substrate using a robotic “pick and place” process and then wave soldered to the printed circuit board.
0025In a working product, the reflectarray is connectable to a controller board <b>40</b> that includes driver electronics. An example controller board is also depicted in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> and includes a ground plane <b>44</b>, a drive signal via <b>46</b>, and driver electronics <b>42</b>. The controller board also includes connectors <b>48</b> that are compatible with connectors <b>50</b> of the reflectarray. The connectors of the two boards can be connected to each other, for example, using wave soldering.
0026<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> depicts a side view of another embodiment of a reflecting element <b>12</b> that utilizes a surface mounted FET <b>22</b> as the non-ideal switching device. This embodiment is similar to the embodiment of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> except that the FET is surface mounted on the same side of the printed circuit board substrate <b>14</b> as the planar patch antenna <b>20</b><i>a</i>. Additionally, the driver electronics <b>42</b> can be soldered directly to the same printed circuit board in which the reflecting element is built.
0027In a reflectarray that utilizes FETs as the non-ideal switching devices, the beam-scanning speed that can be achieved depends on a number of factors including signal-to-noise ratio, crosstalk, and switching time. In the case of a FET, the switching time depends on gate capacitance, drain-source capacitance, and channel resistance (i.e., drain-source resistance). The channel resistance is actually space-dependent as well as time-dependent. In order to minimize the switching time between impedance states, the drain of the FET is DC-shorted at all times. The drain is DC-shorted at all times because floating the drain presents a large off-state channel resistance as well as a large drain-source capacitance due to the huge parallel-plate area of the patch antenna. This implies that the antenna is DC-shorted but one wishes the only “rf short” the antenna sees be at the source. Therefore, the additional antenna/drain short must be optimally located so as to minimally perturb the antenna.
0028Although solid-state transistors are described herein as the non-ideal switching devices, other non-ideal switching devices may be used. Although the reflectarray is described in terms of applications in the microwave and millimeter wave spectrums, the reflectarray could be used with other spectrum bands of electromagnetic radiation.
0029Although specific embodiments in accordance with the invention have been described and illustrated, the invention is not limited to the specific forms and arrangements of parts so described and illustrated. The invention is limited only by the claims.
Contents4
3 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US7843383B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9658321B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8897599B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP2372391A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| US2008161685A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| WO2010143174A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| US9535151B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2023216191A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US12183986B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10978809B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9581681B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7791552B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9151839B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2011128882A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| US8692708B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2002011955A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2004021508A2 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| GB2237936A | Cites | United Kingdom | Applicant |
| US4150382A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4885592A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5268696A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5877726A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US5903239A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6384792B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6384797B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6486511B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6642889B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6809688B2 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| P. M. Backhouse et al—“Antenna-Coupled Microwave Phase Shifters Using GaAs Varactors”; Electronic Letters, IEE Stevenage, GB; vol. 27, No. 6, Mar. 14, 1991; pp. 491-492, XP000225079, ISSN: 0013-5194. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| European Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2006. | Non-patent | – | Third party observation |
| P. M. Backhouse et al-"Antenna-Coupled Microwave Phase Shifters Using GaAs Varactors"; Electronic Letters, IEE Stevenage, GB; vol. 27, No. 6, Mar. 14, 1991; pp. 491-492, XP000225079, ISSN: 0013-5194. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
| European Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2006. | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
7 members in 4 offices
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 99742204 | United States of America | A | |
| US20040997422 | – | – | – |
Members7
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2006109176A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| CN1780050A | China | A | |
| EP1662612A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| JP2006148929A | Japan | A | |
| US7224314B2This record | United States of America | B2 | |
| CN1780050B | China | B | |
| JP5086536B2 | Japan | B2 |
42 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 2 non-final rejections.
- Non-final rejections
- 2
- Final rejections
- 0
- RCEs
- 0
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large EntityM1553 | M1553 | |
| Post Issue Communication - Certificate of CorrectionN423 | N423 | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/ | PGM/ | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowedPTAC | PTAC | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR | WPIR | |
| Dispatch to FDCD1935 | D1935 | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS | PILS | |
| Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084 | N084 | |
| Printer Rush- No mailingTCPB | TCPB | |
| Pubs Case Remand to TCPUBTC | PUBTC | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=. | MN/=. | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=. | N/=. | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center CompleteTSSCOMP | TSSCOMP | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Application Return from OIPEWROIPE | WROIPE | |
| Application Return TO OIPEROIPE | ROIPE | |
| Application Return from OIPEWROIPE | WROIPE | |
| Application Return TO OIPEROIPE | ROIPE | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Cleared by OIPE CSRL194 | L194 | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN | SCAN | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
1 recorded assignment at the USPTO, latest first
- Now
Now: Held by
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC - 2005-01-10
Assignment of assignors interest.
Ownership change- From
- KOFOL JOHN STEPHENLEE GREGORY STEVENTABER ROBERT C
- To
- AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
Recorded 2005-01-10, Signed 2004-10-11
6 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance fee paymentMAFP | MAFP | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Certificate of correctionCC | CC | |
| Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF | STCF | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 07224314
- Publication, DOCDB
- 7224314
- Publication, EPODOC
- US7224314
- Application
- 10997422
- Application, DOCDB
- 99742204
- Application, EPODOC
- US20040997422
Titles
- English
- Device for reflecting electromagnetic radiation
Patent term adjustment
- A delay
- +49 daysthe office missed an examination deadline
- Net adjustment
- 49 days
Classification
- CPC, 10
- H05K1/16
- H01Q3/46
- H01Q15/148
- H01Q19/10
- H01Q21/0018
- H01Q23/00
- H05K1/181
- H05K3/429
- H05K2201/0949
- H05K2201/10166
- IPC, 1
- H01Q1 38
- USPC, 1
- 3437000MS