Variable diameter wind turbine rotor blades
Summary by NHIP
Variable-Length Wind Turbine Rotor
The wind turbine adjusts rotor blade length and pitch angle via an electrical control system to manage wind speeds and system loads. Each blade features a nested carbon compound or glass epoxy extension that retracts after the system commands a second pitch angle if a threshold is exceeded.
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
A system and method for changing wind turbine rotor diameters to meet changing wind speeds and control system loads is disclosed. The rotor blades on the wind turbine are able to adjust length by extensions nested within or containing the base blade. The blades can have more than one extension in a variety of configurations. A cable winching system, a hydraulic system, a pneumatic system, inflatable or elastic extensions, and a spring-loaded jack knife deployment are some of the methods of adjustment. The extension is also protected from lightning by a grounding system.

Term
Term ended
Expired 12 September 2022, 4 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
26 claims: 4 independent, 22 dependent
- 1A wind turbine, comprising:a center hub;a plurality of aerofoil rotor blades arranged around the center hub, each aerofoil rotor blade being adjustable in length and being adjustable in pitch angle;andan electrical control system to control the length and pitch angle of the plurality of aerofoil rotor blades, the electrical control system to command the aerofoil rotor blades to a first pitch angle when the aerofoil rotor blades are at a maximum length, the electrical control system to command the aerofoil rotor blades to a second pitch angle greater than the first pitch angle if a threshold is exceeded, the electrical control system to command a reduction in length of the aerofoil rotor blades after the command to the second pitch angle.
- 16Broadest claimClaim Score 64, broad(NHIP)A method comprising:extending a first aerofoil rotor blade of a plurality of aerofoil rotor blades of a wind turbine to a maximum length for the aerofoil rotor blade;adjusting a pitch angle of the first aerofoil rotor blade to a minimum pitch angle for the aerofoil rotor;detecting an indication to shorten the length of the first aerofoil rotor blade while the first aerofoil rotor blade is at the maximum length;in response to detecting the indication to shorten the length of the first aerofoil rotor blade, adjusting the pitch angle of the first aerofoil rotor blade to another pitch angle greater than the minimum pitch angle;andafter commencing the adjustment of the pitch angle of the first aerofoil rotor blade, shortening the first aerofoil rotor blade to a length that is less than the maximum length.
- 22A wind turbine, comprising a variable diameter rotor having:a center hub;a first set of aerofoil rotor blades arranged around the center hub;a first set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions nested at least partially inside the first set of aerofoil rotor blades;anda second set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions nested at least partially in the first set of aerofoil rotor blades or the first set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions;wherein the first set of blade extensions and the second set of blade extensions are capable of extending an amount less than or equal to the length of the first set of blades by protracting from the first set of blades;wherein the first set of blades are attached to the center hub, the first set of blade extensions protracting from an end of the first set of blades opposite the hub, and the first set of blade extensions being nested at least partially in the second set of blade extensions;and wherein the second set of blade extensions are connected to the first set of blades by the first set of blade extensions such that, when the first set of blade extensions is retracted, the first set of blade extensions nest partially in the first set of blades and partially in the second set of blade extensions.
- 25A wind turbine, comprising a variable diameter rotor having:a center hub;a first set of aerofoil rotor blades arranged around the center hub;a first set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions nested at least partially inside the first set of aerofoil rotor blades;anda second set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions nested at least partially in the first set of aerofoil rotor blades or the first set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions;wherein the first set of blade extensions and the second set of blade extensions are capable of extending an amount less than or equal to the length of the first set of blades by protracting from the first set of blades;wherein the first set of blade extensions are attached to the center hub, with the first set of blade extensions protracting from an end of the first set of blades closest to the center hub;and wherein the second set of blade extensions are nested within the first set of blades at an end opposite the end that is attached to the first set of blade extensions, so that both sets of blade extensions, when completely retracted, are nested within the first set of blades.
Independent claims4
54 paragraphs in 6 sections, as filed
GOVERNMENT INTEREST
This Invention was made with Government support under NREL Subcontract No. ZAM-7-13320-26, Prime Contract DE-AC36-83CHI0093, DOE Case No. S-104,777 awarded by the Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The field of the invention relates to wind turbines. More specifically, the invention relates to the use of a variable diameter rotor for wind turbines.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Wind power is one of the cleanest and most environmentally friendly methods of producing electrical energy currently available. Wind power can produce major amounts of electrical energy without the production of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Additionally, wind power is renewable, as opposed to traditional fossil fuel sources of energy.
Modern wind turbines are placed on towers to take advantage of strong winds found higher up in the atmosphere, above the clutter of buildings and trees. Traditionally, rotors are attached by a hub to a low speed shaft leading into a nacelle. Inside the nacelle, a gearbox takes the high torque and low speed of the low speed shaft and converts it to the low torque and high speed of the high-speed shaft. The high-speed shaft drives a generator to produce electrical energy.
The amount of electrical energy generated is based in part on the size of the rotors used by the wind turbine and its relationship to the size of electrical generator. A general rule is that wind energy is proportional to the square of the diameter of the rotor. A second factor that contributes to the amount of electrical energy is the speed of the winds acting upon the rotor. If a large rotor relative to the size of the generator is suddenly acted upon by high winds, it can produce more electricity than the generator can absorb and additionally over stress the structure. Conversely, in a time of low winds, if the rotor is not large enough for the generator, the wind turbine efficiency may be low and the structure will see only a small proportion of its load carrying potential. What is needed is a wind turbine that can adjust to handle varying wind speed conditions in an efficient manner, while attempting to maximize energy capture for a given support structure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A system and method for adjusting the diameter of a rotor in a wind turbine is described. In one embodiment, a wind turbine rotor is described that comprises a center hub, a first set of aerofoil rotor blades arranged around the center hub, and a first set of aerofoil rotor blade extensions nested inside the first set of aerofoil rotor blades. The first set of extensions are capable of extending an amount less than or equal to the length of the first set of blades by protracting from the first set of blades.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> illustrates a standard wind turbine power generating system.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2</figref><i>a</i>–<b>2</b><i>c </i>illustrates one embodiment of a wind turbine with adjustable rotor blades that can extend to operate at various diameters.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 3</figref><i>a</i>–<b>3</b><i>r </i>illustrates different methods of varying the length a rotor blade and consequently the diameter of the rotor blades.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> illustrates one embodiment of a blade and sliding extension.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>a </i>illustrates one embodiment of a winch pulley extension system.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>b </i>illustrates one embodiment of an extender slide system.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 6</figref><i>a</i>–<b>6</b><i>b </i>illustrates different grounding mechanisms for blade extensions.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 7</figref><i>a</i>–<b>7</b><i>e </i>illustrate exemplary power curves.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
A variable diameter rotor for a wind turbine generator is disclosed. In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that these specific details need not be used to practice the present invention. Well-known structures, materials, circuits, processes and interfaces have not been shown or described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
The variable diameter rotor includes base blades and one or more blade extensions associated with the base blades. The blade extensions move between positions that range from fully extended to fully retracted. In embodiments where blades have more than one blade extension, the blade extensions for a blade may be independent from each other in that various blade extensions for a blade may be more extended or retracted than the other blade extensions for that blade.
In one embodiment, the extension and retraction of rotor blades to increase or decrease rotor diameter, respectively, is based on wind conditions and blade pitch angle. For example, in low winds, the rotor may be fully extended. As the winds increase in speed, the blades may start to pitch and a portion of the rotor blades may be retracted. In high winds, the rotor blades may be fully retracted. Thus, the diameter of the rotor may be increased to increase energy capture in frequently occurring moderate wind speeds (e.g., below rated wind speed) where most of the energy is available. At the same time, the rotor diameter may be reduced in high winds that would cause loads that would otherwise penalize a rotor of relatively large diameter.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> illustrates one embodiment of a wind turbine. Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>, rotor blades <b>100</b> are coupled to rotor hub <b>105</b>. Rotor blades <b>100</b> and rotor hub <b>105</b> form the wind turbine rotor, which is a variable diameter rotor with one or more blade extensions.
In one embodiment, rotor blades <b>100</b> include aerofoils that nest telescopically within blade sections of greater dimension also using aerofoils, thereby preserving greater rotor efficiency. That is, the rotor blades comprise sections that have the ability to nest a narrow, constant chord or tapered aerofoil section inside a wide airfoil section.
Hub <b>105</b> is attached to a nacelle <b>110</b> by the shaft <b>115</b>. The rotation of shaft <b>115</b> is coupled to a gearbox <b>120</b>.
An electrical control system <b>135</b> monitors the conditions of the wind turbine, making appropriate adjustments as necessary. The electronic control system <b>135</b> controls a yaw mechanism <b>140</b>, which controls the direction of the turbine upon tower <b>145</b>. In addition to yaw control, the electronic control system <b>135</b> also controls the pitch mechanism <b>150</b>, which control the pitch angle of the rotor blades <b>100</b>, the rotational speed of the shaft <b>115</b> and the extension of the rotor blades <b>100</b>.
In one embodiment, the diameter of the rotor is adjusted by extending or retracting the blade extensions. In one embodiment, the extension or retraction of blade extensions is performed based on wind speed. The change of rotor diameter compensates for differences in wind speed and turbulence, with a goal being to convert as much wind energy to electrical energy as possible in an efficient manner, while keeping loads within prescribed levels.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 2</figref><i>a–c </i>illustrate the variable diameter rotor in three positions: fully extended, fully retracted, and a position between fully extended and fully retracted. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>a </i>shows the rotor with rotor blades fully extended. This position may be helpful in capturing energy from low velocity winds. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>b </i>shows the rotor with the rotor blade extensions fully retracted. This position may be used when the wind turbine is capturing energy from high velocity winds and trying to avoid accumulating excessive fatigue loads and large extreme loads. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref><i>c </i>shows the rotor with rotor blade extensions only partially extended. This position may be useful for moderate wind conditions. The blade extensions can be extended based on the wind speed measured from an anemometer or by the power produced by the generator.
In one embodiment, the variable diameter rotor may operate with a larger diameter and higher rating than a baseline fixed diameter turbine and the load is regulated using the pitch system. In one embodiment, a torque factor greater than a conventional baseline turbine (e.g., 1.5 times baseline torque) is used whenever the rotor diameter is at its maximum and a minimum pitch angle (e.g., 1°) is used for maximum energy capture. Whenever the blade extensions are not fully extended or whenever a command to retract is received, the minimum pitch angle is immediately set to another predetermined value (e.g., 8°) greater than that used when the rotor diameter is at its maximum. This helps to reduce, and potentially minimize, loads on the system.
There are a number of different techniques for adjusting the rotor diameter. A number of such techniques are shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 3</figref><i>a</i>–<b>3</b><i>r</i>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a </i>shows a base blade <b>300</b> with a blade extension <b>310</b>, in which the base blade <b>300</b> is attached to the central hub <b>105</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>b </i>shows the same base blade <b>300</b> with the extension <b>310</b> fully retracted. Blade extension <b>310</b> is nested in base blade <b>300</b>, and is capable of being extended or retracted along a track or other guidance mechanism. In one embodiment, the base blade comprises a glass/epoxy blade, and the blade extension may be carbon epoxy. Alternatively, other lightweight compounds may be used.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>c </i>shows an embodiment in which a second blade extension <b>320</b> is added to blade extension <b>310</b>, with all blade extensions being fully extended. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>d </i>shows the same double extension rotor blade having its blade extensions <b>310</b> and <b>320</b> being fully retracted (blade extension <b>320</b> nested within blade extension <b>310</b> and blade extension <b>310</b> being nested in base blade <b>300</b>). Blade extension <b>320</b> is extended or retracted along a guidance mechanism, possibly similar to the one used to guide blade extension <b>310</b>.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>e </i>shows an embodiment in which the blade is split into a base blade <b>300</b>, a first blade extension <b>310</b> and a secondary blade extension <b>330</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>f </i>shows the same blade arrangement with the blade extensions <b>310</b> and <b>330</b> retracted, such that blade extension <b>310</b> is nested partially in the base blade <b>300</b> and partly in the secondary blade <b>330</b>.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>g </i>shows an alternate embodiment in which blade extension <b>315</b>, rather than the base blade <b>300</b>, is the wider of the two blades. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>h </i>shows the same design where blade extension is retracted. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>i </i>shows an embodiment where the rotor blade includes three sections. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>j </i>shows the blade in a fully retracted position.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>k </i>shows base blade <b>300</b> attached to the center hub <b>105</b> being narrower than blade extension <b>315</b>. A second blade extension <b>340</b> is attached to the opposite end of blade extension <b>315</b> from base blade <b>300</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>l </i>shows both extensions retracted. In one embodiment, both the base blade <b>300</b> and extension <b>340</b> fit completely within blade extension <b>315</b> when fully retracted. In an alternative embodiment, each extension partially fits within blade extension <b>315</b>.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>m </i>shows an alternate method of deployment for blade extension <b>310</b> from the base blade <b>300</b>. A hinge <b>350</b> connects the extension <b>310</b> to base blade <b>300</b> at the end opposite of hub <b>105</b>. Blade extension <b>310</b> jackknifes open in any one of a number of directions. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>n </i>shows blade extension <b>310</b> in a closed, or “retracted” position. In one embodiment, blade extension <b>310</b> is spring-loaded for moving in the extended position. In an alternate embodiment, inertial force and friction blocks are used. A cable winch may be used to retract the blades during high winds. Alternatively the blade extension is spring loaded in the retracted position and cable, screw jacks, linkages and/or pistons may be used to extend blade extension <b>310</b>.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>o </i>shows an embodiment in which blade extension <b>360</b> is inflatable or otherwise elastic. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>p </i>shows blade extension <b>360</b> when deflated or otherwise deformed to minimum size. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>q </i>illustrates an embodiment where inflatable or elastic blade extension <b>370</b> is between hub <b>105</b> and base blade <b>300</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>r </i>shows this extension <b>370</b> deflated or deformed to minimum size. In one embodiment, the inflatable extension partially inflates or elastically grows depending on wind speed, pitch angle and other control factors.
Note that <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 3</figref><i>a</i>–<b>3</b><i>r </i>only illustrate the rotor blades only in fully extended or fully retracted positions. However, in operation, the blade extensions may only be partially extended or retracted at times depending, in part, on wind conditions. To that extent, the blade extensions and base blades move relative to each other.
One embodiment of the slider track used to guide a blade extension between extended and fully retracted positions is illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>. Blade extension <b>310</b> is guided by one or more bearing tracks <b>400</b> in the interior of the base blade <b>300</b>. This movement may be facilitated by the use of slider bearings. An extender root block <b>410</b> is attached to the end of blade extension <b>310</b> closest to the base blade <b>300</b>. Bearing pads <b>420</b> are arranged around the extender root block <b>410</b> to facilitate movement on the bearing track <b>400</b>. Two support spars straddling blade extension <b>310</b> replace internal center support spars that would be normally used to support the base blade. In one embodiment, the slider bearing may comprise glass-filled PTFE flat sheet material. In an alternate embodiment, anti-friction rolling element, hydrodynamic or hydrostatic bearings are used in place of the slider bearings.
In one additional embodiment, friction guide blocks may be used on the blade extensions <b>310</b> or friction pads at the ends of the base blades <b>300</b> to prevent slippage of blade extension <b>310</b>. A set of replaceable seal strips (not shown) between the base blade <b>300</b> and blade extension <b>310</b> prevent wind, snow, and other debris from obstructing the rotor blade retracting or extending.
There are a number of options for a bearing track material and some exemplary materials are as follows:
a) glass/epoxy structural laminate within a directional surface laminate and no gel coat;
b) phenolic laminate (e.g., Tufnol) facings, which is non-corroding and will act as a failsafe bearing should the PTFE pad become excessively worn; and
c) stainless steel facings, which works well with PTFE, is durable and relatively inexpensive.
Additional bearings within the tip of the base blade may be used to limit any undesirable motion of the extending portion of the blade relative to the base blade. Note that the base blade structure may have to be reinforced to handle the load associated with the sliding blade extension and the slider track.
In one embodiment, a cable winch, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>a</i>, is used for extending and retracting the extensions <b>310</b>. A cable winch <b>500</b> is inserted into the blade base. The cable <b>510</b> (e.g., steel wire rope, braided non-metallic rope) is run through a pulley <b>520</b> attached to the end of the extender root block <b>410</b>. Fixed guides are included for cable <b>510</b>. A moving cross bar <b>530</b> supports the cable when the extender is fully extended. Cross bar <b>530</b> fastens between the base blade sheer webs to offer support and separation of the cable when the blade extension is deployed. The blade extension is extended using mechanical or inertial force. To keep the extension in place, friction pads may be used. In one embodiment, the winch is sized for the maximum load required to winch against the forces composed of the inertial forces and aerodynamic load at normal operational speeds and guide bearing friction. In one embodiment, the winch is anchored into the base blade on a fabricated frame.
In another embodiment, a cable system may be used in conjunction with one or more pulleys to cause the blade extension to extend as a cable is pulled towards the rotor hub. Furthermore, additional methods of extending and retracting the extension include, for example, but not limited to, a recirculating ball worm screw, a jacking screw, a pneumatic retraction and extension system, and a hydraulic retraction and extension system.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>b </i>illustrates one embodiment of an extender slide system showing the root end of a blade extension. This may operate in conjunction with the cable winch system of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>a</i>. Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>b</i>, the extender slide system includes pads <b>540</b> that help self-aligning holders carried on the blade extension. The mounting arrangements for the bearing pads permits self-aligning action both longitudinally and traversely.
In one embodiment, the blade extensions can be grounded to protect against strikes by lightning, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>a </i>shows a spark gaps model of lightning protection. A conductive mesh <b>600</b> is laminated into the skin of the extension <b>310</b>. The mesh on the extension <b>310</b> is connected to the steel wire pulley cable <b>510</b> by spark gaps <b>610</b>. A second group of spark gaps <b>620</b> are placed at the cable winch <b>500</b> end of the cable <b>510</b> to provide an electrical connection to the hub casting <b>105</b>. The base blade <b>300</b> is protected by a standard tip stud <b>630</b> and bonding conductor <b>640</b> through to the hub casting <b>105</b>. In an alternate embodiment, the blade extension also has a tip stud and bonding conductor.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref><i>b </i>shows an alternate embodiment of the grounding device for the extension. The blade extension <b>310</b> uses a conductive mesh <b>600</b> or tip stud and bonding conductor. Instead of the spark gaps, a sliding contact <b>650</b> is attached to the root base of the blade extension. The sliding contact <b>650</b> is in constant contact with either a conductive bus bar, a conductive bearing track <b>660</b>, or some other device to allow connectivity with the hub.
Exemplary Power Curves
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 7</figref><i>a</i>–<b>7</b><i>e </i>show exemplary power curves. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>a </i>is the normal power curve of a conventional baseline wind turbine with fixed diameter rotor. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>b </i>illustrates a power curve that results from an increase in diameter for a turbine with one embodiment of a variable diameter rotor taking the variable diameter rotor up a steeper cubic curve in wind speeds below rated and achieving rated power in a lower wind speed. If the tip speed is the same as baseline at rated wind speed and the diameter is larger, the shaft speed must be less and the rated torque greater than baseline for the same power.
<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>c </i>is a power curve for a variable diameter rotor in which torque is not allowed to rise above baseline, a worthwhile restriction for a small energy loss. Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>c</i>, at the point of intersection of the curve with baseline, all the main parameters, torque, tip speed, power, wind speed are the same and so it follows that the variable diameter rotor will have contracted to the same diameter as the baseline.
In one embodiment, the variable diameter rotor is capable however of further diameter contraction and, at constant tip speed, some further increase in rotor speed. This allows more power to be generated, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>d</i>, without any increase in gearbox torque. Although the extra energy from this strategy arises from operation in rather high, less frequent wind speeds, it still represents an economic gain as only the turbine electrical system cost increases to accommodate this increased power level operating mode. An important feature of the power curve of the variable diameter rotor is the ability to maintain a high almost constant rotor efficiency in the diameter changing regime due to automatic matching of tip speed ratio and rotor solidity.
As to a relation between torque rating of the drive train and diameters for optimum economics, the key lies in the ability to regulate systems loads almost independent of torque up-rating. Results suggest that about a 30% up-rating in drive train torque (1.3 torque factor) is advantageous (at higher torque factors, the energy increases are diminished by the load regulation strategies). This leads to a power curve shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref><i>e</i>. The baseline is the curve with the x's on it.
Load Management
In contrast to conventional wind turbines, the variable diameter rotor may be operated with a relatively larger rotor diameter and higher power. Load regulation may be controlled using appropriate control of pitch system set points and diameter/speed variation. As torque factor increases, the rotor thrust increases. Even for small increases in torque factor, from 1 through 1.3 to 1.5 (at a 1° minimum pitch setting), the increase in rotor thrust may be substantial. To avoid an increase in rotor thrust when increases in torque factor are made, the minimum pitch angle may be increased. For example, the minimum pitch angle may be increased from a more normal 1° to 6° and 8° for torque factors of 1.3 and 1.5.
There is of course some energy penalty associated with increasing the minimum pitch angle. The energy yield increases almost linearly with torque factor in the absence of any load regulation. However, when the pitch setting is adjusted to regulate rotor thrust, the power curves converge at the higher torque factors. Up to a factor of approximately 1.3, there are substantial energy gains with each increment of torque factor, but thereafter little difference.
Although the present invention is described herein with reference to a specific preferred embodiment, many modifications and variations therein will readily occur to those with ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, all such variations and modifications are included within the intended scope of the present invention as defined by the following claims.
Contents6
10 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2005285406A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010104437A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010076614A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8029241B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8219257B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7517198B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7891949B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9297357B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2015275863A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| DE102012109171A1 | Cited by | Germany | Applicant |
| US7891950B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9903338B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2012243992A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7944078B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9885343B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2010143123A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2018093754A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7205678B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8092172B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8851842B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8784057B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8939726B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| DE102018100129A1 | Cited by | Germany | Applicant |
| US2011103953A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2022289361A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7632070B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2021324831A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2007217918A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2011206506A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010332041A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2019107101A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8376704B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7808149B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8459948B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010024311A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9945355B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10814959B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| DE102018100129A1 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| US8047783B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8192169B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2012219417A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8608441B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9394046B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| USH2188H | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7633178B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10505419B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP2006537A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| US2010133852A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2012051892A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010143122A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2022325693A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2010158687A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10137542B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9500179B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7891948B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2019134939A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| US2010196159A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010143121A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9506452B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9297264B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| GB2517935A | Cited by | United Kingdom | Search report |
| US2010068058A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US11885293B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| DE102012109521A1 | Cited by | Germany | Applicant |
| US8321062B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7582977B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2010221101A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| DE102011053404B4 | Cited by | Germany | Applicant |
| US10190572B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8231347B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010135794A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2011142642A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8267653B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8485782B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009191063A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8700362B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009053060A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| WO2009047679A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US2010327583A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7883313B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009148290A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| KR102063837B1 | Cited by | Republic of Korea | Search report |
| US8221075B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11866150B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2010326343A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| USH2188H1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8388315B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009196758A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010150717A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010135795A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010329866A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US11454212B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2013083886A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| US7931445B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2018093754A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8128361B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2009047679A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
| WO02077449A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| WO03036082A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| EP1327773A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
2 priority claims, no other members on record
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15733702 | United States of America | A | |
| US20020157337 | – | – | – |
54 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 1 non-final rejection, 1 final rejection and 1 RCE.
- Non-final rejections
- 1
- Final rejections
- 1
- RCEs
- 1
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | |
|---|---|
| Recordation of Patent Grant Mailed | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowed | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowed | |
| Dispatch to FDC | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for Issue | |
| Issue Fee Payment Verified | |
| Issue Fee Payment Received | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowed | |
| Mail Examiner's Amendment | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowed | |
| Examiner's Amendment Communication | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129 | |
| Request for Continued Examination (RCE) | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Workflow - Request for RCE - Begin | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejection | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejection | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Supplemental Response | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Reference capture on IDS | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | |
| Response after Non-Final Action | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Response to Election / Restriction Filed | |
| Mail Restriction Requirement | |
| Restriction/Election Requirement | |
| Reference capture on IDS | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | |
| IFW Amended case processing Complete | |
| IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete | |
| Rescind Nonpublication Request for Pre Grant Publication | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPE | |
| Application Is Now Complete | |
| Additional Application Filing Fees | |
| Applicant has submitted new drawings to correct Corrected Papers problems | |
| Additional Application Filing Fees | |
| A statement by one or more inventors satisfying the requirement under 35 USC 115, Oath of the Applic | |
| Applicant has submitted new drawings to correct Corrected Papers problems | |
| Notice Mailed--Application Incomplete--Filing Date Assigned | |
| Correspondence Address Change | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security Review | |
| Initial Exam Team nn |
6 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Information on status: patent grantGrantedPATENTED CASESTCF | STCF | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 06972498
- Publication, DOCDB
- 6972498
- Publication, EPODOC
- US6972498
- Application
- 10157337
- Application, DOCDB
- 15733702
- Application, EPODOC
- US20020157337
Titles
- English
- Variable diameter wind turbine rotor blades
Patent term adjustment
- A delay
- +265 daysthe office missed an examination deadline
- Applicant delay
- −158 days
- Net adjustment
- 107 days
Classification
- CPC, 3
- F03D7/0236
- F05B2240/2021
- Y02E10/72
- IPC, 1
- F03D7 02
- USPC, 7
- 290055000
- 290044000
- 415002100
- 415004500
- 416001000
- 416087000
- 416089000