US6907495B2

Rewriting system for rewriting a memory on a vehicle controller

Summary by NHIP

Vehicle Memory Rewriting Device

The device rewrites data in a vehicle controller's non-volatile memory by detecting offline communication states. It prohibits offline determination until a second time elapses during deletion or writing, where this second duration exceeds the first and often matches the required operation time.

Claim Score by NHIP

Read claim 23, the broadest

Abstract

The rewriting device for rewriting data stored in a memory of a vehicle controller with new data is provided. The rewriting device is capable of communicating with the vehicle controller. When deleting or writing operation on the memory is not being performed, the rewriting device determines that communication between the rewriting device and the vehicle controller is offline if no response from the vehicle controller within a first determination time. When deleting operation or writing operation on the memory is being performed, the determination of offline is prohibited until a second determination time has elapsed. The second determination time is greater than the first determination time. It is preferable that the second determination time for deleting operation is the time necessary to delete the data stored in the memory, and that the second determination time for writing operation is the time necessary to write the new data into the memory.

US6907495B2, drawing sheet 1 — Sheet 1 of 9

Term

Term ended

Expired 25 March 2022, 4.5 years ago.

26 claims: 5 independent, 21 dependent

1
A rewriting device for rewriting data stored in a non-volatile memory of a vehicle controller;the rewriting device capable of communicating with the vehicle controller and configured to determine that communication between the rewriting device and the vehicle controller is offline when no response is received from the vehicle controller within a first determination time from the time at which the rewriting device transmits to the vehicle controller a request for a deleting operation of the data;wherein, when the deleting operation of the data is being performed, the rewriting device is configured to prohibit the determination of offline until a second determination time elapses from the time at which the rewriting device transmits to the vehicle controller a request for a result of the deleting operation, the second determination time being greater than the first determination time.
8
A rewriting device for rewriting data stored in a non-volatile memory of a vehicle controller with new data;the rewriting device capable of communicating with the vehicle controller and configured to determine that communication between the rewriting device and the vehicle controller is offline when no response is received from the vehicle controller within a first determination time from the time at which the rewriting device transmits to the vehicle controller a request for a writing operation of new data;and wherein, when the writing operation of the new data is being performed, the rewriting device is configured to prohibit the determination of offline until a second determination time elapses from the time at which the rewriting device transmits to the vehicle controller a request for a result of the writing operation, the second determination time being greater than the first determination time.
15
A rewriting system for rewriting data stored in a memory of a vehicle controller with new data, the system comprising:a rewriting device capable of communicating with the vehicle controller, the rewriting device configured to determine that communication between the rewriting device and the vehicle controller is offline if no response is received from the vehicle controller within a first determination time from the time at which the rewriting device transmits to the vehicle controller a request for a deleting or writing operation of the data;and wherein, when the deleting or writing operation on the memory is being performed, the determination of offline is prohibited until a second determination time elapses from the time at which the rewriting device transmits to the vehicle controller a request for a result of the deleting or writing operation, the second determination time being greater than the first determination time.
23
Broadest claimClaim Score 73, broad(NHIP)A method for rewriting data stored in a memory of a vehicle controller, the method comprising:sending a request asking the vehicle controller to delete the data in the memory;determining that communication with the vehicle controller is offline if there is no response from the vehicle controller within a reference time from the time at which the request asking the vehicle controller to delete the data is sent: starting operation for deleting the data stored in the memory;sending to the vehicle controller a request for a result of the operation for deleting;and determining that communication with the vehicle controller is offline if there is no response from the vehicle controller within a determination time from the time at which the request for the result of the operation for deleting is sent;and wherein the determination time is greater than the reference time.
25
A method for rewriting data stored in a memory of a vehicle controller with new data, the method comprising:sending a request asking the vehicle controller to write the new data into the memory;determining that communication with the vehicle controller is offline if there is no response from the vehicle controller within a reference time from the time at which the request asking the vehicle controller to write the new data is sent;starting operation for writing the new data into the memory;sending to the vehicle controller a request for a result of the operation for writing: and determining that communication with the vehicle controller is offline if there is no response from the vehicle controller within a determination time from the time at which the request for the result of the operation for writing is sent;and wherein the determination time is greater than the reference time.

Independent claims5

76 paragraphs in 5 sections, as filed

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

0001The present invention relates to a system for rewriting a program or data stored in a memory of a vehicle controller with other program or data transferred from an external rewriting device.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

0002Vehicles are subjected to various types of control by an electronic control unit (hereafter referred to as “ECU”). Such control includes engine-related control of an air fuel ratio, fuel injection amount, and emission as well as body-related control of a power window, an air bag, and an ABS. The ECU provides various types of control for the vehicle based on current conditions and traveling conditions of the vehicle sensed by various sensors mounted on the vehicle.

0003The ECU comprises a central processing unit (CPU), a ROM (Read Only Memory) that stores programs and data to be executed, a RAM (Random Access Memory) which provides a work area for execution and which stores results of computation, and an I/O interface for receiving signals from various sensors and transmitting control signals to various parts of the engine.

0004A system is known wherein a rewritable and non-volatile memory, such as a flash memory, an EEPROM, or an EPROM, is used as the ROM to allow a program or data to be rewritten through serial communication. Such a system typically comprises a rewriting device, an ECU and a serial communication path connecting them together. Rewriting is achieved by deleting data stored in the rewritable memory mounted on the ECU and writing new data transferred from the rewriting device via serial communication into the memory. By way of example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 63-223901 describes a method for changing a program stored in the EEPROM of the ECU in response to a request from an external device via a SCI (Serial Communication Interface) terminal with the ECU being mounted on the vehicle.

0005Generally, deleting and writing operation on a non-volatile memory such as a flash memory and EEPROM requires a relatively large amount of time. The ECU may be busy during deleting or writing operation. As a result, the ECU may not be able to respond to the rewriting device. When there is no response from the ECU for a predetermined period, the rewriting device determines that communication between the ECU and the rewriting device is offline.

0006<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 5 and 6</figref> show a typical method for rewriting a program stored in a memory of the ECU. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is a flow chart showing the process performed by the rewriting device, and <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> is a flow chart showing the process performed by the ECU.

0007In response to a request for deleting operation from the rewriting device (501), the ECU sends a signal to the rewriting device indicative of start of deleting operation (552) and deletes a program stored in a memory of the ECU (553). In response to the signal indicative of start of deleting operation, the rewriting device requests the result of the deleting operation (505). If the deleting operation has not been completed, the ECU sends a signal to the rewriting device indicating that the deleting operation is in progress (556). If the deleting operation has been completed, the ECU sends a signal indicative of completion of the deleting operation (557).

0008Similarly, writing operation is carried out. In response to a request for writing operation from the rewriting device (521), the ECU sends a signal to the rewriting device indicative of start of writing operation (562) and writes a new program to the memory of the ECU (563). In response to the signal indicative of start of writing operation, the rewriting device requests the result of the writing operation (525). If the writing operation has not been completed, the ECU sends a signal to the rewriting device indicating that the writing operation is in progress (566). If the writing operation has been completed, the ECU sends a signal indicative of completion of the writing operation (567).

0009At step 509 or 529, if the response from the ECU indicates that the deleting or writing operation is in progress, the process returns to step 505 or 525. If the response from the ECU indicates that the deleting or writing operation has been completed, the process proceeds to the following step 510 or 530. In this way, the rewriting device determines whether deleting or writing operation is being performed or has been completed by sending a request for the result of the deleting or writing operation and by receiving a response to the request. Even if the deleting or writing operation is being performed, an erroneous determination of offline is not made as long as there is a response from the ECU.

0010<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> shows typical two forms of a non-volatile memory mounted on the ECU. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7A</figref> shows a form in which a flash memory 216, which is a non-volatile memory, is provided independently of a CPU 214. In other words, the flash memory 216 is mounted on a chip different from the CPU 214. The flash memory 216 is coupled to a chip of a microcomputer where the CPU is mounted via an external bus 205. When the ECU 210 receives a request for deleting or writing operation on the flash memory 216 from the rewriting device 211, the operation is performed by an input/output controller (not shown) that controls input/output through the external bus 205. In this way, since deleting or writing control on the flash memory 216 is performed independently of the CPU, the CPU does not become busy during deleting or writing operation.

0011<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7B</figref> shows another form in which the flash memory 216 and the CPU 214 are provided on a single chip to constitute one chip microcomputer. The flash memory 216 is coupled to the CPU 214 via an internal bus 207. Deleting or writing operation is performed by an interface means incorporated in the CPU 214 as a function. In this case, the CPU may become busy during deleting or writing operation. When the CPU is busy, the ECU 210 may be unable to communicate with the rewriting device 211.

0012Recently, in order to reduce costs relating to the ECU, a microcomputer including a non-volatile memory, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7B</figref>, has been increasingly employed. As described above, in this form, a CPU may become busy during deleting or writing operation on a non-volatile memory. When the ECU is busy, it may not respond to a request for the result of deleting or writing operation from the rewriting device. As a result, even though communication between the ECU and the rewriting device is normal, the rewriting device may determine that the communication is offline if a response from the ECU has not been received within a predetermined period. Thus, when the CPU of the ECU is busy, the rewriting device may made an erroneous determination of offline.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

0013It is an object of the invention to provide a rewriting system capable of avoiding an erroneous determination of offline when deleting or writing operation on a non-volatile memory is being performed in the ECU.

0014According to one aspect of the invention, a rewriting device for rewriting data stored in a memory of a vehicle controller with new data is provided. The rewriting device is capable of communicating with the vehicle controller. When deleting or writing operation on the memory is not being performed, the rewriting device determines that communication between the rewriting device and the vehicle controller is offline if no response is received from the vehicle controller within a first determination time. When deleting or writing operation on the memory is being performed, the determination of offline is prohibited until a second determination time elapses. The second determination time is greater than the first determination time. Because the second determination time is greater than the first determination time, an erroneous determination of offline due to a busy state of the CPU in the vehicle controller is avoided when deleting or writing operation is being carried out.

0015According to one embodiment of the invention, the second determination time for deleting operation is the time necessary to delete the data stored in the memory. Similarly, the second determination time for writing operation is the time necessary to write the new data into the memory. The deleting time and writing time depend on the specification of the memory. Thus, the second determination time is optimized in accordance with the specification of the memory.

0016According to another embodiment of the invention, the deleting time is calculated based on the size of the data and the specification of the memory, and the writing time is calculated based on the size of the new data and the specification of the memory. The calculation is implemented in the vehicle controller.

0017According to another embodiment of the invention, the rewriting device acquires the deleting time from the vehicle controller and sets it in the second determination time for deleting operation. Similarly, the rewriting device acquires the writing time from the vehicle controller and sets it in the second determination time for writing operation. When deleting operation is being performed, the rewriting device determines that the communication is offline if no response is received from the vehicle controller within the second determination time that is set according to the deleting time. Similarly, when writing operation is being performed, the rewriting device determines that the communication is offline if no response is received from the vehicle controller within the second determination time that is set according to the writing time.

0018According to another embodiment of the invention, the rewriting device exchanges no message with the vehicle controller until the first determination time elapses from the time at which a request of the result of deleting or writing operation is sent to the vehicle controller. This reduces the overhead of response by the vehicle controller.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

0019<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a block diagram showing functional blocks of a rewriting system in one embodiment of the invention;

0020<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> shows an operational procedure of a rewriting system in one embodiment of the invention;

0021<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a flow chart showing deleting and writing operation in a rewriting device in one embodiment of the invention;

0022<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is a flow chart showing deleting and writing operation in a vehicle controller in one embodiment of the invention;

0023<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is a flow chart showing conventional deleting and writing operation in a rewriting device;

0024<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> is a flow chart showing conventional deleting and writing operation in a vehicle controller; and

0025<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> shows a typical form of a CPU and a memory in a vehicle controller.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

0026A system for rewriting a program stored in a non-volatile memory of a vehicle controller will be described referring to attached drawings. The present invention, however, is not limited to the system but is applicable to various systems for rewriting data stored in a memory.

0027<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> shows a general functional block diagram of a rewriting system according to the invention. The rewriting system comprises an ECU 10 and a rewriting device 11. The rewriting device 11 is a rewriting device authorized by a manufacturer of vehicles on which the ECU 10 is mounted. By connecting the rewriting device 11 to the ECU 10 via a serial communication bus and operating the rewriting device 11, security for preventing a program or data stored in the ROM 16 of the ECU 10 from being rewritten without proper authorization is released. Thus, the rewriting device 11 is allowed to rewrite a program or data stored in the ROM 16.

0028The ECU 10 comprises a central processing unit 14 (hereafter referred to as a “CPU”) including a microcomputer and associated circuit elements, ROMs 16 and 17 which are non-volatile memories and which store programs and data, a RAM 15 (Random Access Memory) which provides a work area for execution and which stores results of computations, and an I/O interface 18 for receiving signals from various sensors 19 and transmitting control signals to various parts of the engine.

0029Signals from various sensors 39 include an engine rotation speed (Ne), an engine water temperature (Tw), an intake air temperature (Ta), a battery voltage (VB), and an ignition switch (IGSW). Thus, based on a signal input from the I/O interface 18, the CPU 14 invokes a control program and data from the ROMs 16 and 17 to execute computations, and outputs the results to various parts of the vehicle via the I/O interface 18 to control various functions of the vehicle.

0030The ECU 10 also comprises an interface 12. The interface 12 has a protocol for communication with the rewriting device 11 to enable serial communication between the ECU 10 and the rewriting device 11.

0031The rewritable ROM 16 is a non-volatile memory from which stored data can be deleted and to which new data can be written. The rewritable ROM 16 can be, for example, a flash memory or an EEPROM. The non-rewritable ROM 17 is a non-volatile memory. The non-rewritable ROM 17 can be implemented by specifying a part of the memory area of a rewritable ROM as an unchangeable area, or by using a mask ROM for which data is fixed during manufacturing and from or to which data can subsequently not be deleted or written. Alternatively, the ROM 17 can be implemented with a PROM to which data can be written only once.

0032The ROMs 16 and 17 can be implemented as two memories that are physically separated. Alternatively, the memory area of a single memory may be divided into two areas so that one of the areas is used as a rewritable area, while the other is used as a non-rewritable area. For example, after a non-rewritable area in which a program or the like is stored has been specified in an EEPROM, a rewritable area is specified with start and end addresses in the unfilled space of the memory.

0033A program P1, which is to be rewritten by the rewriting device 11, is stored in the rewritable ROM 16. Programs that implement an authentication part 33, an initialization part 34, a deleting part 35 and a writing part 36 are stored in the non-rewritable ROM 17. The authentication part 33 judges whether the rewriting device 11 is authentic. If it is judged that the rewriting device is authentic, the authentication part 33 releases the security that prevents data stored in the ROM 16 from being changed without proper authorization.

0034The initialization part 34 performs an initialization process for starting deleting and writing operation. The deleting part 35 deletes the program P1. The writing part 36 serially receives data blocks representative of a new program P2 from the rewriting device 11. The data blocks are assembled from program code of the new program P2. The writing part 36 writes a partial program code included in each data block into the ROM 16.

0035The rewriting device 11 comprises a security release requesting part 20, a rewriting initialization part 21, a deleting requesting part 23 and a deleting result requesting part 25, which are stored in a memory of the rewriting device 11 as programs. The security release requesting part 20 requests the ECU 10 to release the security so that rewriting to the rewritable ROM 16 of the ECU 10 is permitted. The rewriting initialization part 21 performs an initialization process for starting deleting and writing operation. The deleting requesting part 23 requests the ECU 10 to delete the program P1 in the ROM 16. The deleting result requesting part 25 requests the result of the deleting operation from the ECU 10 to determine whether the deleting operation is in progress or has been completed.

0036The rewriting device 11 also comprises a writing requesting part 27, a writing result requesting part 29 and a data block assembling part 30, which are stored in a memory as programs. The data block assembling part 30 assembles data blocks from the new program P2. Each data block includes a program code field for a partial program code of the new program P2 and an address field for a leading address of the ROM 16 in which the partial program code is to be stored. For example, each partial program code has a length of eight bits. The data blocks assembled are serially sent to the ECU 10 via serial communication by the writing requesting part 27.

0037The writing requesting part 27 requests the ECU 10 to write a partial program code of each data block in an address of the ROM 16 that is indicated by an address value in the address field of each data block. The writing result requesting part 29 requests the result of the writing operation from the ECU 10 to determine whether the writing operation is in progress or has been completed.

0038The rewriting device 11 comprises an offline determining part 31. The offline determining part 31 judges whether communication between the rewriting device 11 and the ECU 10 is offline. More specifically, if no response is received from the ECU 10 until a predetermined first determination time DT1 has elapsed from the time at which a request for the deleting time DT is sent, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline. Similarly, if no response is received from the ECU 10 until the first determination time DT1 has elapsed from the time at which a request for deleting operation is sent, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline.

0039In addition, if no response is received from the ECU 10 until a predetermined second determination time DT2 has elapsed from the time at which a request for the result of deleting operation is sent, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline. The second determination time DT2 is greater than the first determination time DT1. In other words, when deleting operation is being performed in the ECU 10, the offline determining part 31 prohibits the determination of offline until the second determination time DT2 has elapsed. As a result, an erroneous determination of offline due to a busy state of the CPU 14 in the ECU 10 can be avoided.

0040In a similar way, if no response is received from the ECU 10 until a predetermined first determination time WT1 has elapsed from the time at which a request for the writing time WT is sent and from the time at which a request for writing operation is sent, respectively, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline. The value of the first determination time WT1 may be consistent with or different from the value of the first determination time DT1.

0041In addition, if no response is received from the ECU 10 until a predetermined second determination time WT2 has elapsed from the time at which a request for the result of the writing operation is sent, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline. The second determination time WT2 is greater than the first determination time WT1. In other words, when writing operation is being performed in the ECU 10, the offline determining part 31 prohibits the determination of offline until the second determination time WT2 has elapsed. As a result, an erroneous determination of offline due to a busy state of the CPU 14 in the ECU 10 can be avoided.

0042The ECU 10 also comprises a deleting time calculating part 37 and a writing time calculating part 38. The deleting time calculating part 37 calculates the time DT necessary to delete the program P1. A unit time of deletion, which can be expressed, for example, in blocks or bytes, depends on the type of the ROM 16. That is, a unit time of deletion is predetermined in accordance with the specification of the ROM 16. The deleting time calculating part 37 calculates the deleting time DT based on the size of the program P1 and a unit time of deletion specific to the ROM 16.

0043The writing time calculating part 38 calculates the time WT necessary to write a partial program code of the new program P2 received from the rewriting device 11. As is the case for deletion, a unit time of writing depends on the type of the ROM 16, and is predetermined in accordance with the specification of the ROM 16. The writing time calculating part 38 calculates the writing time WT based on the size of a partial program code of the program P2 and a unit time of writing specific to the ROM 16. In this way. the writing time WT is calculated in accordance with the amount of data written into the ROM 16 at a time by the writing part 36.

0044In another embodiment, the deleting and writing time calculating parts 37 and 38 may be provided in the rewriting device 11. The rewriting device 11 may have a unit time of deletion and writing specific to the ROM 16 in advance. Alternatively, the rewriting device 11 may request a unit time of deletion and writing from the ECU 10. Thus, the deleting time DT and the writing time WT are calculated in the rewriting device 11.

0045The rewriting device 11 preferably comprises a deleting time acquiring part 22 and a writing time acquiring part 26. Before or when the deleting requesting part 23 requests the ECU 10 to delete the program P1, the deleting time acquiring part 22 acquires from the ECU 10 the deleting time DT calculated by the deleting time calculating part 37. The deleting time acquiring part 22 sets the acquired deleting time DT in the second determination time DT2. Similarly, before or when the writing requesting part 27 requests the ECU 10 to write a partial program code of the new program P2, the writing time requesting part 26 acquires from the ECU 10 the writing time WT calculated by the writing time calculating part 38. The writing time acquiring part 26 sets the acquired writing time WT in the second determination time WT2.

0046Thus, when deleting and writing operation is being performed, the determination of offline is made based on the deleting time DT and writing time WT, respectively, the second determination time being optimized in accordance with the specification of the ROM 16. Alternatively, as is the case for the first determination time DT1 and WT1, the second determination time DT2 and WT2 may also be predetermined as fixed values.

0047<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG.2</figref> shows rewriting operation according to the rewriting system shown in FIG. 1. The rewriting operation is initiated, for example, by operating the rewriting device 11 after it has been connected to the ECU 10. Alternatively, the rewriting operation may be initiated by operating the ECU 10.

0048At step 41, the security release requesting part 20 of the rewriting device 11 sends a signal to the ECU 10 indicative of a request for releasing security. The ECU 10 responds to the signal and invokes the authentication part 33. The authentication part 33 initiates an authentication process for confirming that the authorized rewriting device is connected.

0049The authentication process can be carried out in an arbitrary manner. For example, the rewriting device 11 and the ECU 10 have security functions, respectively. The rewriting device 11 calculates its own function value for a given number and sends the calculated value to the ECU 10. On the other hand, the ECU 10 calculates its own function value for the same number. The ECU 10 compares the value calculated by itself with the value received from the rewriting device 11. The ECU 10 determines that the rewriting device is authentic if the two values are the same. The ECU 10 sends a signal to the rewriting device 11 indicative of a permission of rewriting. Thus, the security is released.

0050If the ECU 10 authenticates the rewriting device 11 and permits it to rewrite to the ROM 16, the process proceeds to step 42. The rewriting initialization part 21 of the rewriting device 11 sends a signal to the ECU 10 indicative of start of rewriting. The initialization part 34 of the ECU 10 returns a signal indicative of a permission of rewriting when ready for rewriting.

0051At step 43, the rewriting device 11 sends a request to the ECU 10 for shifting to a rewriting operation mode. The initialization part 34 of the ECU 10 executes a process of shifting to the rewriting operation mode. At step 44, the rewriting initialization part 21 of the rewriting device 11 queries the ECU 10 if the shift has been completed. If the shift has been completed, the rewriting initialization part 34 of the ECU 10 sends a signal to the rewriting device 11 indicative of completion of the shift.

0052At step 45, the deleting time acquiring part 22 of the rewriting device 11 requests the time necessary to delete the program P1. In response to the request, the deleting time calculating part 37 of the ECU 10 calculates the deleting time DT and sends it to the rewriting device 11. The deleting time acquiring part 22 sets the acquired deleting time DT in the second determination time DT2. If the deleting time acquiring part 22 receives no response to the deleting time request within the first determination time DT1, the offline determining part 31 of the rewriting device 11 determines that communication between the rewriting device 11 and the ECU 10 is offline.

0053At step 46, the deleting requesting part 23 of the rewriting device 11 requests the ECU 10 to delete the program P1. In response to the request, the deleting part 35 of the ECU 10 sends a signal indicative of start of deleting operation. If the deleting requesting part 23 receives no response to the deleting request within the first determination time DT1, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline.

0054At step 47, the deleting result requesting part 25 of the rewriting device 11 requests the result of the deleting operation. When the deleting operation of the program P1 has been completed, in response to the request, the deleting part 35 of the ECU 10 sends a signal to the rewriting device 11 indicative of completion of the deleting operation. If the deleting result requesting part 25 receives no response to the deleting result request within the second determination time DT2, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline.

0055In the rewriting device 11, the new program P2 has been prepared by the data block assembling part 30 as data blocks. Assembling of the data blocks from the program P2 is typically performed before the security release request or the rewriting start signal is sent to the ECU 10. Alternatively, it may be performed immediately before step 47 or 48.

0056At step 48, the writing time acquiring part 26 of the rewriting device 11 requests the time necessary to write the new program P2. In response to the request, the writing time calculating part 38 of the ECU 10 calculates the writing time WT and sends it to the rewriting device 11. The writing time acquiring part 26 sets the writing time WT in the second determination time WT2. If the writing time acquiring part 26 receives no response to the writing time request within the first determination time WT1, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline.

0057At step 49, the writing requesting part 27 of the rewriting device 11 transfers a data block including a partial program code of the new program P2 to the ECU 10 together with a signal indicative of a request for writing operation. In response to the request, the writing part 36 of the ECU 10 sends a signal to the rewriting device 11 indicative of start of writing operation. If the writing requesting part 27 receives no response to the writing request within the first determination time WT1, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline.

0058The writing part 36 writes the partial program code included in the data block to the ROM 16. The partial program code is written in an address of the ROM 16 that is indicated by the address field of the data block. A check mechanism may be provided for determining whether the address value in the address field of the data block is included in addresses of data deleted by the deleting part 35.

0059At step 50, the writing result requesting part 29 of the rewriting device 11 requests the result of the writing operation. When the writing operation has been completed, the writing part 36 sends a signal to the rewriting device 11 indicative of completion of the writing operation. If the writing result requesting part 29 receives no response to the writing result request within the second determination time WT2, the offline determining part 31 determines that the communication is offline.

0060The writing requesting part 27 transfers a next data block to the ECU 10 if the completion signal indicates a normal end. The steps 49 and 50 are repeated until all the program code of the program P2 is written into the ROM 16. When writing of all the program code has been completed, the writing requesting part 27 requests the ECU 10 to release the rewriting operation mode (step 51). In response to the request, the writing part 36 releases the rewriting operation mode.

0061<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a flow chart of deleting and writing operations carried out in the rewriting device 11. At step 60, the rewriting device 11 sends a signal indicative of a request for the deleting time to the ECU 10. When the deleting time DT is received from the ECU (step 61), the deleting time DT is set in the second determination time DT2 (step 64). The rewriting device 11 sends a signal to the ECU 10 indicative of a request for deleting operation (step 65).

0062If there is no response from the ECU 10 at step 61, it is determined whether the predetermined first determination time DT1 (for example, 30 milliseconds) has elapsed from the time at which the request is sent at step 60 (step 62). Similarly, if there is no response from the ECU 10 at step 66, it is determined whether the predetermined first determination time DT1 has elapsed from the time at which the request is sent at step 65 (step 67). If the first determination time DT1 has not elapsed, the process returns to steps 61 and 66, respectively, and rewriting device 11 waits a response from the ECU 10 again. If the first determination time DT1 has elapsed, it is determined that communication between the rewriting device 11 and the ECU 10 is offline (steps 63 and 68).

0063If there is a response from the ECU 10 at step 66, the rewriting device 11 sends a signal to the ECU 10 indicative of a request for the result of the deleting operation (step 70). If there is a response from the ECU 10 (step 71), it is checked whether the response indicates completion of the deleting operation (step 72). If the response indicates completion of the deleting operation, the process proceeds to step 76. If the deleting operation is in progress, the process returns to step 70, and the signal indicative of a request for the result of the deleting operation is sent to the ECU 10 again. Alternatively, the return to step 70 may be made after a predetermined period.

0064At step 71, if there is no response from the ECU 10, it is checked whether the first determination time DT1 has elapsed from the time at which the request is sent at step 70 (step 73). If the first determination time DT1 has not elapsed, the process returns to step 71, and the rewriting device 11 waits a response from the ECU 10 again. If the first determination time DT1 has elapsed, it is checked whether the second determination time DT2 (for example, 400 milliseconds) has elapsed from the time at which the first request is sent at step 70 (step 74). In other words, the elapsed time of the second determination time DT2 is measured from the time at which step 70 is first processed. At step 74, if the second determination time DT2 has not elapsed, the process returns to the step 70. Alternatively, the process may return to the step 71. If there is no response until the second determination time DT2 has elapsed, it is determined that the communication is offline (step 75).

0065In another embodiment, the elapsed time of the first determination time at step 73 and second determination time at step 74 are measured from the time at which the response from the ECU 10 is received at step 66.

0066Thus, when deleting operation is being performed, the determination of offline is made based on the second determination time that is longer than the first determination time. As a result, an erroneous determination of offline due to a busy state of the ECU can be avoided. In addition, the determination of offline can be made more accurately since the second determination time is predetermined in accordance with the specification of the ROM.

0067At step 76, if the deleting operation ends normally, the process proceeds to step 80 in FIG. 3B. If the deleting operation does not end normally, the process exits from this routine.

0068At step 80, a signal indicative of a request for the writing time is sent to the ECU 10. The rewriting device 11 receives the writing time WT and sets it in the second determination time WT2 (step 84). The process proceeds to step 85, and a data block including a partial program code of the new program P2 is transferred to the ECU 10.

0069If there is no response from the ECU 10 at step 81, it is determined whether the predetermined first determination time WT1 (for example, 30 milliseconds) has elapsed from the time at which the request is sent at step 80 (step 82). Similarly, if there is no response from the ECU 10 at step 86, it is determined whether the predetermined first determination time WT1 has elapsed from the time at which the request is sent at step 85 (step 87). If the first determination time WT1 has not elapsed, the process returns to steps 81 and 86, respectively, and rewriting device 11 waits a response from the ECU 10 again. If the first determination time WT1 has elapsed, it is determined that the communication is offline (steps 83 and 88).

0070If there is a response from the ECU 10 at step 86, a signal indicative of a request for the result of the writing operation is sent to the ECU 10 (step 90). The process proceeds to step 92, and it is checked whether the response indicates completion of the writing operation. If the response indicates completion of the writing operation, the process proceeds to step 96. If the writing operation is in progress, the process returns to step 90, and the rewriting device 11 sends the signal to the ECU 10 indicative of a request for the result of the writing operation again. The return to step 90 may be made after a predetermined period.

0071If there is no response from the ECU 10 at step 91, it is checked whether the first determination time WT1 has elapsed from the time at which the request is sent at step 90 (step 93). If the first determination time WT1 has not elapsed, the process returns to step 91, and the rewriting device 11 waits a response from the ECU 10 again. If the first determination time WT1 has elapsed, it is checked whether the second determination time WT2 (for example, 400 milliseconds) has elapsed from the time at which the first request is sent at step 90 (step 94). In other words, the elapsed time of the second determination time WT2 is measured from the time at which step 90 is first processed. At step 94, if the second determination time WT2 has not elapsed, the process returns to the step 90. Alternatively, the process may return to the step 91. If there is no response until the second determination time WT2 has elapsed, it is determined that the communication is offline (step 95).

0072In another embodiment, the elapsed time of the first determination time at step 93 and second determination time at step 94 are measured from the time at which the response from the ECU 10 is received at step 86.

0073Thus, when writing operation is being performed, the determination of offline is made based on the second determination time that is longer than the first determination time. As a result, an erroneous determination of offline due to a busy state of the ECU can be avoided. In addition, the determination of offline can be made more accurately because the second determination time is predetermined in accordance with the specification of the ROM.

0074At step 96, if it is determined that the writing operation ends normally, the process proceeds to step 97. If all the program code of the new program P2 has not been sent to the ECU 10, the process returns to step 80 to send a next data block. If all the program code of the new program P2 is sent to the ECU 10, the process exits from this routine.

0075<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> shows a flow chart of deleting and writing operation carried out by the ECU 10. If a signal indicative of a request for the deleting time is received at step 101, the deleting time DT is sent to the rewriting device 11 (step 102). If a signal indicative of a request for deleting operation is received at step 103, a signal indicative of start of the deleting operation is sent to the rewriting device 11 (step 104), and deleting operation is performed (step 105). When a signal indicative of a request for the result of the deleting operation is received from the rewriting device 11 (step 106), a signal indicative of the result of the deleting operation is sent to the rewriting device 11 (step 107). The result signal shows the state of the deleting operation, in such a manner that a value “1” indicates completion of the deleting operation and a value “0” indicates that the deleting operation is in progress.

0076In a similar way, if a signal indicative of a request for the writing time is received from the rewriting device 11 (step 111), the writing time WT is calculated and is sent to the rewriting device 11 (step 112). If a data block of the new program P2 is received from the rewriting device 11 at step 113, a signal indicative of start of writing operation is sent to the rewriting device 11 (step 114), and a partial program code included in the received data block is written into the ROM 16 (step 115). If a signal indicative of a request for the result of the writing operation is received from the rewriting device 11 (step 116), the result of the writing operation is sent to the rewriting device 11 (step 117). The writing result signal shows the state of the writing operation, in such a manner that a value “1” indicates completion of the writing operation and a value “0” indicates that the writing operation is in progress. The transfer of the new program P2 from the rewriting device 11 to the ECU 10 is executed for each data block. Therefore, steps 113 through 117 are repeated until all the data blocks of the new program P2 are received (step 118).

Contents5

Every citation, both ways

Citations
Document	Relation	Office	Cited during
US9158926B2	Cited by	United States of America	Applicant
EP0941910A1	Cites	European Patent Office (EPO)	Applicant
DE19642737A1	Cites	Germany	Applicant
DE19850133A1	Cites	Germany	Applicant
JP2000089822A	Cites	Japan	Applicant
US2003012212A1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US4091448A	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US5523948A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US5862326A	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US6044014A	Cites	United States of America	Applicant
US6256226B1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US6321263B1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US6341239B1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
US6609165B1	Cites	United States of America	Search report
JPH03238541A	Cites	Japan	Applicant
JPS63223901A	Cites	Japan	Applicant

8 members in 4 offices

This recordMember, by publication datePriority claim

Priority claims5

Priority claims
Document	Office	Kind	Date
2000112125	Japan	–	2000-04-13
2000112125	Japan	A	2000-04-13
2000112125	Japan	A	2000-04-13
2000112125	–	–	–
JP20000112125	–	–	–

Members8

Family members, oldest first
Document	Office	Kind
EP1145911A1	European Patent Office (EPO)	A1	2001-10-17
US2001032288A1	United States of America	A1	2001-10-18
JP2001297009A	Japan	A	2001-10-26
US6907495B2This record	United States of America	B2	2005-06-14
EP1145911B1	European Patent Office (EPO)	B1	2005-08-17
DE60112643D1	Germany	D1	2005-09-22
DE60112643T2	Germany	T2	2006-03-09
JP3835969B2	Japan	B2	2006-10-18

52 transactions on the USPTO file

Allowed after 3 non-final rejections and 1 final rejection.

Non-final rejections: 3
Final rejections: 1
RCEs: 0
Appeals: 0

Over time

Point at a mark for the transaction

Transactions

Prosecution transactions, newest first
	Event
2017-07-10	Expire Patent
2007-09-05	Correspondence Address Change
2005-06-14	Recordation of Patent Grant Mailed
2005-06-14	Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowed
2005-05-25	Issue Notification MailedAllowed
2005-05-16	Receipt into Pubs
2005-05-13	Dispatch to FDC
2005-05-13	Application Is Considered Ready for Issue
2005-05-05	Issue Fee Payment Verified
2005-05-05	Issue Fee Payment Received
2005-05-03	Receipt into Pubs
2005-03-14	Workflow - File Sent to Contractor
2005-02-08	Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowed
2005-02-07	Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowed
2005-01-25	IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete
2005-01-25	Date Forwarded to Examiner
2005-01-06	Response after Final Action
2005-01-06	Workflow incoming amendment IFW
2004-10-07	Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejection
2004-10-04	Final RejectionFinal rejection
2004-09-24	Request for Refund
2004-07-23	Date Forwarded to Examiner
2004-06-28	Response after Non-Final Action
2004-06-28	Workflow incoming amendment IFW
2004-03-26	Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection
2004-03-22	Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection
2004-01-13	Date Forwarded to Examiner
2003-12-19	Correspondence Address Change
2003-12-18	Certified Translation of Specification Filed
2003-12-18	Response after Non-Final Action
2003-12-18	Request for Extension of Time - Granted
2003-07-30	Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection
2003-07-29	Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection
2003-05-30	Date Forwarded to Examiner
2003-05-21	Response after Non-Final Action
2003-05-21	Request for Extension of Time - Granted
2003-01-21	Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection
2003-01-13	Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection
2002-10-17	Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU
2001-12-03	Reference capture on IDS
2001-12-03	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
2001-12-03	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
2001-07-30	Request for Foreign Priority (Priority Papers May Be Included)
2001-07-30	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
2001-07-30	Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
2001-07-13	Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU
2001-06-21	Transfer Inquiry
2001-06-21	Transfer Inquiry
2001-06-11	Application Dispatched from OIPE
2001-06-07	Correspondence Address Change
2001-04-29	IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security Review
2001-04-13	Initial Exam Team nn

7 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC

Over the term

Point at a mark for the event

Events

Legal events, newest first
	Event	Code
2017-08-01	Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance feeLapsedFP	FP
2017-07-10	Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH	STCH
2017-06-14	Lapse for failure to pay maintenance feesLapsedLAPS	LAPS
2017-01-19	Maintenance fee reminder mailedREMI	REMI
2012-10-01	Fee paymentFPAY	FPAY
2008-11-13	Fee paymentFPAY	FPAY
2001-04-13	AssignmentAS	AS