Thermal actuator with optimized heater length
Summary by NHIP
Thermal actuator with optimized heater length
The apparatus uses a resistive cantilever to generate heat and deflect a micromechanical device. A uniform resistor portion extends between 0.3L and 0.7L of the total length, while the resistive material is titanium aluminide.
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
An apparatus for a thermal actuator for a micromechanical device, especially a liquid drop emitter is disclosed. The disclosed thermal actuator includes a base element and a cantilevered element extending from the base element a length L and normally residing at a first position before activation. The cantilevered element includes a layer constructed of an electrically resistive material, patterned to have a uniform resistor portion extending a length L, from the base element, wherein 0.3L<=L<SB>H</SB><PDAT><=0.7L. The cantilevered element includes a second layer constructed of a dielectric material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion attached to the first layer. A pair of electrodes connected to the uniform resistor portion to apply an electrical pulse to cause resistive heating, resulting in a thermal expansion of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer relative to the second layer and deflection of the cantilevered element.</PTEXT>

Term
Term ended
Expired 17 January 2022, 4.7 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
26 claims: 4 independent, 22 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 43, average(NHIP)A thermal actuator for a micro-electromechanical device comprising:(a) a base element;(b) a cantilevered element extending a length L from the base element and residing at a first position, the cantilevered element including a first layer constructed of an electrically resistive material patterned to have a uniform resistor portion extending a length L H from the base element, wherein 0.3L≦L H ≦0.7L, and a second layer constructed of a dielectric material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion and attached to the first layer;and (c) a pair of electrodes connected to the uniform resistor portion to apply an electrical pulse to cause resistive heating, resulting in a thermal expansion of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer relative to the second layer and deflection of the cantilevered element to a second position, followed by restoration of the cantilevered element to the first position as heat transfers from the uniform resistor portion and the temperature thereof decreases.
- 8A thermal actuator for a micro-electromechanical device comprising:(a) a base element;(b) a cantilevered element extending a length L from the base element and residing at a first position, the cantilevered element including a first layer constructed of titanium aluminide which extends substantially the length L of the cantilevered element and is patterned to have a uniform resistor portion extending a length L H from the base element, wherein 0.3L≦L H ≦0.7L, and a second layer constructed of a dielectric material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion and attached to the first layer;and (c) a pair of electrodes connected to the uniform resistor portion to apply an electrical pulse to cause resistive heating, resulting in a thermal expansion of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer relative to the second layer and deflection of the cantilevered element to a second position, followed by restoration of the cantilevered element to the first position as heat transfers from the uniform resistor portion and the temperature thereof decreases.
- 13A liquid drop emitter comprising:(a) a chamber, formed in a substrate, filled with a liquid and having a nozzle for emitting drops of the liquid;(b) a thermal actuator having a cantilevered element extending a length L from a wall of the chamber and a free end residing in a first position proximate to the nozzle, the cantilevered element including a first layer constructed of an electrically resistive material patterned to have a uniform resistor portion extending a length L H from the wall of the chamber, wherein 0.3L ≦L H 0.7L, and a second layer constructed of a dielectric material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion and attached to the first layer;and (c) a pair of electrodes connected to the uniform resistor portion to apply an electrical pulse to cause resistive heating, resulting in a thermal expansion of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer relative to the second layer and rapid deflection of the cantilevered element, ejecting liquid at the nozzle, followed by restoration of the cantilevered element to the first position as heat transfers from the uniform resistor portion and the temperature thereof decreases.
- 21A liquid drop emitter comprising:(a) a chamber, formed in a substrate, filled with a liquid and having a nozzle for emitting drops of the liquid;(b) a thermal actuator having a cantilevered element extending a length L from a wall of the chamber and a free end residing in a first position proximate to the nozzle, the cantilevered element including a first layer constructed of titanium aluminide which extends substantially the length L of the cantilevered element and is patterned to have a uniform resistor portion extending a length L H from the wall of the chamber, wherein 3.0L≦L H ≦0.7L, and a second layer constructed of a dielectric material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion and attached to the first layer;and (c) a pair of electrodes connected to the uniform resistor portion to apply an electrical pulse to cause resistive heating, resulting in a thermal expansion of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer relative to the second layer and rapid deflection of the cantilevered element, ejecting liquid at the nozzle, followed by restoration of the cantilevered element to the first position as heat transfers from the uniform resistor portion and the temperature thereof decreases.
Independent claims4
149 paragraphs in 6 sections, as filed
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to micro-electromechanical devices and, more particularly, to micro-electromechanical thermal actuators such as the type used in ink jet devices and other liquid drop emitters.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS) are a relatively recent development. Such MEMS are being used as alternatives to conventional electro-mechanical devices as actuators, valves, and positioners. Micro-electromechanical devices are potentially low cost, due to use of microelectronic fabrication techniques. Novel applications are also being discovered due to the small size scale of MEMS devices.
Many potential applications of MEMS technology utilize thermal actuation to provide the motion needed in such devices. For example, many actuators, valves and positioners use thermal actuators for movement. In some applications the movement required is pulsed. For example, rapid displacement from a first position to a second, followed by restoration of the actuator to the first position, might be used to generate pressure pulses in a fluid or to advance a mechanism one unit of distance or rotation per actuation pulse. Drop-on-demand liquid drop emitters use discrete pressure pulses to eject discrete amounts of liquid from a nozzle.
Drop-on-demand (DOD) liquid emission devices have been known as ink printing devices in ink jet printing systems for many years. Early devices were based on piezoelectric actuators such as are disclosed by Kyser et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 3,946,398 and Stemme in U.S. Pat. No. 3,747,120. A currently popular form of ink jet printing, thermal ink jet (or “bubble jet”), uses electroresistive heaters to generate vapor bubbles which cause drop emission, as is discussed by Hara et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,296,421.
Electroresistive heater actuators have manufacturing cost advantages over piezoelectric actuators because they can be fabricated using well developed microelectronic processes. On the other hand, the thermal ink jet drop ejection mechanism requires the ink to have a vaporizable component, and locally raises ink temperatures well above the boiling point of this component. This temperature exposure places severe limits on the formulation of inks and other liquids that may be reliably emitted by thermal ink jet devices. Piezoelectrically actuated devices do not impose such severe limitations on the liquids that can be jetted because the liquid is mechanically pressurized.
The availability, cost, and technical performance improvements that have been realized by ink jet device suppliers have also engendered interest in the devices for other applications requiring micro-metering of liquids. These new applications include dispensing specialized chemicals for micro-analytic chemistry as disclosed by Pease et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,695, dispensing coating materials for electronic device manufacturing as disclosed by Naka et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,902,648; and for dispensing microdrops for medical inhalation therapy as disclosed by Psaros et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,882. Devices and methods capable of emitting, on demand, micron-sized drops of a broad range of liquids are needed for highest quality image printing, but also for emerging applications where liquid dispensing requires mono-dispersion of ultra small drops, accurate placement and timing, and minute increments.
A low cost approach to micro drop emission is needed which can be used with a broad range of liquid formulations. Apparatus and methods are needed which combines the advantages of microelectronic fabrication used for thermal ink jet with the liquid composition latitude available to piezo-electro-mechanical devices.
A DOD ink jet device which uses a thermo-mechanical actuator was disclosed by T. Kitahara in JP 2,030,543, filed Jul. 21, 1988. The actuator is configured as a bi-layer cantilever moveable within an ink jet chamber. The beam is heated by a resistor causing it to bend due to a mismatch in thermal expansion of the layers. The free end of the beam moves to pressurize the ink at the nozzle causing drop emission. Recently, disclosures of a similar thermo-mechanical DOD ink jet configuration have been made by K. Silverbrook in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,067,797; 6,087,638; 6,239,821 and 6,243,113. Methods of manufacturing thermo-mechanical ink jet devices using microelectronic processes have been disclosed by K. Silverbrook in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,180,427; 6,254,793 and 6,274,056.
Thermo-mechanically actuated drop emitters are promising as low cost devices which can be mass produced using microelectronic materials and equipment and which allow operation with liquids that would be unreliable in a thermal ink jet device. However, operation of thermal actuator style drop emitters, at high drop repetition frequencies, requires careful attention to the effects of heat build-up. The drop generation event relies on creating a pressure impulse in the liquid at the nozzle. A significant rise in baseline temperature of the emitter device, and, especially, of the thermo-mechanical actuator itself, precludes system control of a portion of the available actuator displacement that can be achieved without exceeding maximum operating temperature limits of device materials and the working liquid itself. Apparatus and methods of operation for thermo-mechanical DOD emitters are needed which manage the effects of heat in the thermo-mechanical actuator so as to maximize the productivity of such devices.
A useful design for thermo-mechanical actuators is a cantilevered beam anchored at one end to the device structure with a free end that deflects perpendicular to the beam. The deflection is caused by setting up thermal expansion gradients in the beam in the perpendicular direction. Such expansion gradients may be caused by temperature gradients or by actual materials changes, layers, thru the beam. It is advantageous for pulsed thermal actuators to be able to establish the thermal expansion gradient quickly, and to dissipate it quickly as well, so that the actuator will restore to an initial position. Reduction of the input energy assists in restoration of the actuator by reducing the amount of waste heat energy that must be dissipated.
The repetition frequency of thermal actuations is important to the productivity of the devices that employ them. For example, the printing speed of a thermal actuator DOD ink jet printhead depends on the drop repetition frequency, which, in turn, depends on the time required to re-set the thermal actuator. Cantilevered element thermal actuators, which can be operated with reduced energy and at acceptable peak temperatures, are needed in order to build systems that operate at high frequency and can be fabricated using MEMS fabrication methods.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a thermo-mechanical actuator which uses reduced input energy and which does not require excessive peak temperatures.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide a liquid drop emitter which is actuated by an energy efficient thermo-mechanical cantilever operating at peak temperatures that will not damage working liquids.
The foregoing and numerous other features, objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent upon a review of the detailed description, claims and drawings set forth herein. These features, objects and advantages are accomplished by constructing a thermal actuator for a micro-electromechanical device comprising a base element and a cantilevered element extending from the base element a length L and normally residing at a first position before activation. The cantilevered element includes a first layer constructed of an electrically resistive material, such as titanium aluminide, patterned to have a uniform resistor portion extending a length L<sub>H </sub>from the base element, wherein 0.3L≦L<sub>H</sub>≦0.7L. The cantilevered element includes a second layer constructed of a dielectric material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion attached to the first layer. A pair of electrodes connected to the uniform resistor portion to apply an electrical pulse to cause resistive heating, resulting in a thermal expansion of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer relative to the second layer and deflection of the cantilevered element to a second position, followed by restoration of the cantilevered element to the first position as heat transfers from the uniform resistor portion and the temperature decreases. The first layer preferably extends for substantially the full length of the cantilevered element and the uniform resistor portion is preferably formed by removing a central slot of this material from a partial length of the cantilevered element. Forming the uniform resistor portion to have a length L<sub>H</sub>, where 0.3L<L<sub>H</sub><0.7L, results in reduced energy requirements for operation while not causing excessive increases in operating temperatures.
The present invention is particularly useful as a thermal actuator for liquid drop emitters used as printheads for DOD ink jet printing. In this preferred embodiment the thermal actuator resides in a liquid-filled chamber that includes a nozzle for ejecting liquid. The thermal actuator includes a cantilevered element extending from a wall of the chamber and a free end residing in a first position proximate to the nozzle. Application of a heat pulse to the cantilevered element causes deflection of the free end forcing liquid from the nozzle.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an ink jet system according to the present invention,
FIG. 2 is a plan view of an array of ink jet units or liquid drop emitter units according to the present invention,
FIG. 3 is an enlarged plan view of an individual ink jet unit shown in FIG. 2,
FIG. 4 is a side view illustrating the movement of a thermal actuator according to the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the early stages of a process suitable for constructing a thermal actuator according to the present invention wherein a first layer of the cantilevered element is formed,
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the next stages of the process illustrated in FIG. 5 wherein a second layer of the cantilevered element is formed;
FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the next stages of the process illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6 wherein a sacrificial layer in the shape of the liquid filling a chamber of a drop emitter according to the present invention is formed;
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the next stages of the process illustrated in FIGS. 5-7 wherein a liquid chamber and nozzle of a drop emitter according to the present invention is formed,
FIG. 9 is a side view of the final stages of the process illustrated in FIGS. 5-8 wherein a liquid supply pathway is formed and the sacrificial layer is removed to complete a liquid drop emitter according to the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a side view illustrating the operation of a drop emitter according the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a perspective view of first layer designs to illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 12 is a plan view of first layer designs to illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating geometrical quantities used to analyze preferred embodiments of the present inventions;
FIG. 14 is a plot of thermal actuator performance attributes of the present inventions;
FIG. 15 is a side view illustrating a comparison between two preferred embodiments of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
As described in detail herein below, the present invention provides apparatus for a thermal actuator and a drop-on-demand liquid emission device. The most familiar of such devices are used as printheads in ink jet printing systems. Many other applications are emerging which make use of devices similar to ink jet printheads, however which emit liquids other than inks that need to be finely metered and deposited with high spatial precision. The terms ink jet and liquid drop emitter will be used herein interchangeably. The inventions described below provide drop emitters based on thermo-mechanical actuators so as to energy efficiency and drop emission productivity.
Turning first to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic representation of an ink jet printing system which may use an apparatus and be operated according to the present invention. The system includes an image data source <b>400</b> which provides signals that are received by controller <b>300</b> as commands to print drops. Controller <b>300</b> outputs signals to a source of electrical pulses <b>200</b>. Pulse source <b>200</b>, in turn, generates an electrical voltage signal composed of electrical energy pulses which are applied to electrically resistive means associated with each thermo-mechanical actuator <b>15</b> within ink jet printhead <b>100</b>. The electrical energy pulses cause a thermo-mechanical actuator <b>15</b> (herein after “thermal actuator”) to rapidly bend, pressurizing ink <b>60</b> located at nozzle <b>30</b>, and emitting an ink drop <b>50</b> which lands on receiver <b>500</b>. The present invention causes the emission of drops having substantially the same volume and velocity, that is, having volume and velocity within +/−20% of a nominal value. Some drop emitters may emit a main drop and very small trailing drops, termed satellite drops. The present invention assumes that such satellite drops are considered part of the main drop emitted in serving the overall application purpose, e.g., for printing an image pixel or for micro dispensing an increment of fluid.
FIG. 2 shows a plan view of a portion of ink jet printhead <b>100</b>. An array of thermally actuated ink jet units <b>110</b> is shown having nozzles <b>30</b> centrally aligned, and ink chambers <b>12</b>, interdigitated in two rows. The ink jet units <b>110</b> are formed on and in a substrate <b>10</b> using microelectronic fabrication methods. An example fabrication sequence which may be used to form drop emitters <b>110</b> is described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/726,945 filed Nov. 30, 2000, for “Thermal Actuator”, assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Each drop emitter unit <b>10</b> has associated electrical lead contacts <b>42</b>, <b>44</b> which are formed with, or are electrically connected to, a electrically uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, shown in phantom view in FIG. <b>2</b>. In the illustrated embodiment, the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> is formed in a deflector layer of the thermal actuator <b>15</b> and participates in the thermo-mechanical effects as will be described. Element <b>80</b> of the printhead <b>100</b> is a mounting structure which provides a mounting surface for microelectronic substrate <b>10</b> and other means for interconnecting the liquid supply, electrical signals, and mechanical interface features.
FIG. 3<i>a </i>illustrates a plan view of a single drop emitter unit <b>110</b> and a second plan view FIG. 3<i>b </i>with the liquid chamber cover <b>28</b>, including nozzle <b>30</b>, removed.
The thermal actuator <b>15</b>, shown in phantom in FIG. 3<i>a </i>can be seen with solid lines in FIG. 3<i>b</i>. The cantilevered element <b>20</b> of thermal actuator <b>15</b> extends from edge <b>14</b> of liquid chamber <b>12</b> which is formed in substrate <b>10</b>. Cantilevered element anchor portion <b>26</b> is bonded to substrate <b>10</b> and anchors the cantilever.
The cantilevered element <b>20</b> of the actuator has the shape of a paddle, an extended flat shaft ending with a disc of larger diameter than the shaft width. This shape is merely illustrative of cantilever actuators which can be used, many other shapes are applicable. The paddle shape aligns the nozzle <b>30</b> with the center of the cantilevered element free end portion <b>27</b>. The fluid chamber <b>12</b> has a curved wall portion at <b>16</b> which conforms to the curvature of the free end portion <b>27</b>, spaced away to provide clearance for the actuator movement.
FIG. 3<i>b </i>illustrates schematically the attachment of electrical pulse source <b>200</b> to the electrically resistive heater <b>25</b> at interconnect terminals <b>42</b> and <b>44</b>. Voltage differences are applied to voltage terminals <b>42</b> and <b>44</b> to cause resistance heating via u-shaped resistor <b>25</b>. This is generally indicated by an arrow showing a current <b>1</b>. In the plan views of FIG. 3, the actuator free end portion <b>27</b> moves toward the viewer when pulsed and drops are emitted toward the viewer from the nozzle <b>30</b> in cover <b>28</b>. This geometry of actuation and drop emission is called a “roof shooter” in many ink jet disclosures.
FIG. 4 illustrates in side view a cantilevered thermal actuator <b>15</b> according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 4<i>a </i>the actuator is in a first position and in FIG. 4<i>b </i>it is shown deflected upward to a second position. Cantilevered element <b>20</b> extends a length L from an anchor location <b>14</b> of base element <b>10</b>. The cantilevered element <b>20</b> is constructed of several layers. First layer <b>22</b> is the deflector layer which causes the upward deflection when it is thermally elongated with respect to other layers in the cantilevered element <b>20</b>. It is constructed of an electrically resistive material, preferably intermetallic titanium aluminide, that has a large coefficient of thermal expansion. First layer <b>22</b> has a thickness of h<sub>1</sub>.
The cantilevered element <b>20</b> also includes a second layer <b>23</b>, attached to the first layer <b>22</b>. The second layer <b>23</b> is constructed of a material having a low coefficient of thermal expansion, with respect to the material used to construct the first layer <b>22</b>. The thickness of second layer <b>23</b> is chosen to provide the desired mechanical stiffness and to maximize the deflection of the cantilevered element for a given input of heat energy. Second layer <b>23</b> may also be a dielectric insulator to provide electrical insulation for a resistive heater element formed into the first layer. The second layer may be used to partially define an electroresistor formed as a portion of first layer <b>22</b>. Second layer <b>23</b> has a thickness of h<sub>2</sub>.
Second layer <b>23</b> may be composed of sub-layers, laminations of more than one material, so as to allow optimization of functions of heat flow management, electrical isolation, and strong bonding of the layers of the cantilevered element <b>20</b>.
Passivation layer <b>21</b> shown in FIG. 4 is provided to protect the first layer <b>22</b> chemically and electrically. Such protection may not be needed for some applications of thermal actuators according to the present invention, in which case it may be deleted. Liquid drop emitters utilizing thermal actuators which are touched on one or more surfaces by the working liquid may require passivation layer <b>21</b> which is chemically and electrically inert to the working liquid.
A heat pulse is applied to first layer <b>22</b>, causing it to rise in temperature and elongate. Second layer <b>23</b> does not elongate nearly as much because of its smaller coefficient of thermal expansion and the time required for heat to diffuse from first layer <b>22</b> into second layer <b>23</b>. The difference in length between first layer <b>22</b> and the second layer <b>23</b> causes the cantilevered element <b>20</b> to bend upward as illustrated in FIG. 4<i>b</i>. When used as actuators in drop emitters, the bending response of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> must be rapid enough to sufficiently pressurize the liquid at the nozzle. Typically, electroresistive heating apparatus is adapted to apply heat pulses and an electrical pulse duration of less than 10 μsecs. is used and, preferably, a duration less than 4 μsecs.
FIGS. 5 through 9 illustrate fabrication processing steps for constructing a single liquid drop emitter according to some of the preferred embodiments of the present invention. For these embodiments the first layer <b>22</b> is constructed using an electrically resistive material, such as titanium aluminide, and a portion is patterned into a resistor for carrying electrical current, <b>1</b>. FIG. 5 illustrates a first layer <b>22</b> of a cantilever in a first stage of fabrication. The illustrated structure is formed on a substrate <b>10</b>, for example, single crystal silicon, by standard microelectronic deposition and patterning methods. A portion of substrate <b>10</b> will also serve as a base element from which cantilevered element extends. Deposition of intermetallic titanium aluminide may be carried out, for example, by RF or pulsed DC magnetron sputtering. An example deposition process that may be used for titanium aluminide is described in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/726,945 filed Nov. 30, 2000, for “Thermal Actuator”, assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
First layer <b>22</b> is deposited with a thickness of h<sub>1</sub>. A uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> is patterned in first layer <b>22</b> by removing a pattern of the layer material. The current path is indicated by an arrow and letter “I”. Addressing electrical leads <b>42</b> and <b>44</b> are illustrated as being formed in the first layer <b>22</b> material as well. Leads <b>42</b>, <b>44</b> may make contact with circuitry previously formed in base element substrate <b>10</b> or may be contacted externally by other standard electrical interconnection methods, such as tape automated bonding (TAB) or wire bonding. A passivation layer <b>21</b> is formed on substrate <b>10</b> before the deposition and patterning of the first layer <b>22</b> material. This passivation layer may be left under first layer <b>22</b> and other subsequent structures or removed in a subsequent patterning process.
FIG. 6 illustrates a second layer <b>23</b> having been deposited and patterned over the previously formed first layer <b>22</b> portion of the thermal actuator. A uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> (not shown in FIG. 6) was formed by removing electrically resistive material in the first layer <b>22</b> leaving a remaining resistor pattern. Second layer <b>23</b> is formed over the first layer <b>22</b> covering the remaining resistor pattern. Second layer <b>23</b> is deposited with a thickness of h<sub>2</sub>. The second layer <b>23</b> material has low coefficient of thermal expansion compared to the material of first layer <b>22</b>. For example, second layer <b>23</b> may be silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, aluminum oxide or some multi-layered lamination of these materials or the like.
Additional passivation materials may be applied at this stage over the second layer <b>23</b> for chemical and electrical protection. Also, the initial passivation layer <b>21</b> is patterned away from areas through which fluid will pass from openings to be etched in substrate <b>10</b>.
FIG. 7 shows the addition of a sacrificial layer <b>29</b> which is formed into the shape of the interior of a chamber of a liquid drop emitter. A suitable material for this purpose is polyimide. Polyimide is applied to the device substrate in sufficient depth to also planarize the surface which has the topography of the first <b>22</b> and second <b>23</b> layers as illustrated in FIG. <b>6</b>. Any material which can be selectively removed with respect to the adjacent materials may be used to construct sacrificial structure <b>29</b>.
FIG. 8 illustrates drop emitter liquid chamber walls and cover formed by depositing a conformal material, such as plasma deposited silicon oxide, nitride, or the like, over the sacrificial layer structure <b>29</b>. This layer is patterned to form drop emitter chamber <b>28</b>. Nozzle <b>30</b> is formed in the drop emitter chamber, communicating to the sacrificial material layer <b>29</b>, which remains within the drop emitter chamber <b>28</b> at this stage of the fabrication sequence.
FIG. 9 shows a side view of the device through a section indicated as A—A in FIG. <b>8</b>. In FIG. 9<i>a </i>the sacrificial layer <b>29</b> is enclosed within the drop emitter chamber walls <b>28</b> except for nozzle opening <b>30</b>. Also illustrated in FIG. 9<i>a</i>, the substrate <b>10</b> is intact. Passivation layer <b>21</b> has been removed from the surface of substrate <b>10</b> in gap area <b>13</b> and around the periphery of the cantilevered element <b>20</b>. The removal of layer <b>21</b> in these locations was done at a fabrication stage before the forming of sacrificial structure <b>29</b>.
In FIG. 9<i>b</i>, substrate <b>10</b> is removed beneath the cantilever element <b>20</b> and the liquid chamber areas around and beside the cantilever element <b>20</b>. The removal may be done by an anisotropic etching process such as reactive ion etching, or such as orientation dependent etching for the case where the substrate used is single crystal silicon. For constructing a thermal actuator alone, the sacrificial structure and liquid chamber steps are not needed and this step of etching away substrate <b>10</b> may be used to release the cantilevered element <b>20</b>.
In FIG. 9<i>c </i>the sacrificial material layer <b>29</b> has been removed by dry etching using oxygen and fluorine sources. The etchant gasses enter via the nozzle <b>30</b> and from the newly opened fluid supply chamber area <b>12</b>, etched previously from the backside of substrate <b>10</b>. This step releases the cantilevered element <b>20</b> and completes the fabrication of a liquid drop emitter structure.
FIG. 10 illustrates a side view of a liquid drop emitter structure according to some preferred embodiments of the present invention. FIG. 10<i>a </i>shows the cantilevered element <b>20</b> in a first position proximate to nozzle <b>30</b>. FIG. 10<i>b </i>illustrates the deflection of the free end <b>27</b> of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> towards nozzle <b>30</b>. Rapid deflection of the cantilevered element to this second position pressurizes liquid <b>60</b> causing a drop <b>50</b> to be emitted.
In an operating emitter of the cantilevered element type illustrated, the quiescent first position may be a partially bent condition of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> rather than the horizontal condition illustrated FIG. 10<i>a</i>. The actuator may be bent upward or downward at room temperature because of internal stresses that remain after one or more microelectronic deposition or curing processes. The device may be operated at an elevated temperature for various purposes, including thermal management design and ink property control. If so, the first position may be as substantially bent as is illustrated in FIG. 10<i>b. </i>
For the purposes of the description of the present invention herein, the cantilevered element will be said to be quiescent or in its first position when the free end is not significantly changing in deflected position. For ease of understanding, the first position is depicted as horizontal in FIG. 4<i>a </i>and FIG. 10<i>a</i>. However, operation of thermal actuators about a bent first position are known and anticipated by the inventors of the present invention and are fully within the scope of the present inventions.
FIGS. 5 through 9 illustrate a preferred fabrication sequence. However, many other construction approaches may be followed using well known microelectronic fabrication processes and materials. For the purposes of the present invention, any fabrication approach which results in a cantilevered element including a first layer <b>22</b> and a second layer <b>23</b> may be followed. Further, in the illustrated sequence of FIGS. 5 through 9, the liquid chamber <b>28</b> and nozzle <b>30</b> of a liquid drop emitter were formed in situ on substrate <b>10</b>. Alternatively a thermal actuator could be constructed separately and bonded to a liquid chamber component to form a liquid drop emitter.
The inventors of the present have discovered that the energy efficiency of a cantilevered thermal actuator can be increased by heating only a portion of the deflector layer, first layer <b>22</b>. The electrically resistive material used to construct first layer <b>22</b> may be patterned to have a portion <b>25</b> of uniform resistance which extends for only part of the cantilevered element length L. FIG. 11 illustrates this concept. FIG. 11<i>a </i>illustrates a perspective view of patterned first layer <b>22</b> as previously illustrated in FIG. <b>5</b>. The electrically resistive material of first layer <b>22</b> is patterned into a u-shaped resistor by removing a central slot <b>24</b> of material. In FIG. 11<i>a </i>the uniform resistor portion extends a length L<sub>H </sub>the full length of the cantilevered element extension length L, that is, L<sub>H</sub>=L.
In FIG. 11<i>b </i>the first layer <b>22</b> is patterned to have a uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> which extends a shorter distance L<sub>H </sub>than the full cantilevered element extension L, that is, L<sub>H</sub><L. First layer <b>22</b> is illustrated as divided into three general portions by dotted lines: free end portion <b>27</b>, uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, and anchored end portion <b>26</b>. Electrical input pads <b>42</b> and <b>44</b> are formed in anchor end portion <b>26</b>.
When operating a cantilevered element actuator having a first layer <b>22</b> design as illustrated in FIG. 11<i>b</i>, heating will initially occur in an approximately uniform fashion over the length L<sub>H </sub>in uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>. First layer <b>22</b>, in uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, will elongate with respect to second layer <b>23</b> (not shown in FIG. 11<i>b</i>) causing the cantilevered element to bend away from first layer <b>22</b>. Free end portion <b>27</b> of first layer <b>22</b> will also be deflected since it is rigidly attached to uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>. Free end portion <b>27</b> acts as a lever arm, further magnifying the amount of bending deflection which occurs in the directly heated uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>. Significant input energy may be saved because of this magnification effect. A desired amount of actuator free end deflection, D, may be achieved with less input energy because only a fraction of the elongation layer is heated.
FIG. 12 is a plan view of first layer <b>22</b> illustrating dimensional relationships which are helpful in understanding the present inventions. First layer <b>22</b> is shown formed into the three portions discussed previously with respect to FIG. 11<i>b</i>. Anchored end portion <b>26</b>, uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, and free end portion <b>27</b>. Uniform heating will occur in uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> when an electrical current is passed between input pads <b>42</b> and <b>44</b>. This uniform resistive heating causes the deflection of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> as illustrated in FIG. <b>10</b>. Some significant resistive heating may occur in the anchor end portion <b>26</b>. Such anchor end resistive heating is wasted energy and is preferably minimized by increasing the cross section area of the first layer <b>22</b> material and shortening current path lengths as much as possible in the anchor end portion <b>26</b>. Very little resistive heating will occur in free end portion <b>27</b> as the current path will be substantially confined to the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>.
In FIG. 12, the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> is formed by removing first layer <b>22</b> material in a central slot <b>24</b> having a length L<sub>S </sub>extending from the anchor location <b>14</b>. Central slot <b>24</b> has an average width of W<sub>S</sub>. In order to avoid hot spots of resistive heating, the central slot <b>24</b> is preferably formed with uniform dimensions along length L<sub>S</sub>. For reasons of mechanical strength and thermal cycling efficiency, it is also desirable that the width W<sub>S </sub>of central slot <b>24</b> be made as narrow as is feasible consistent with defining a current path of uniform resistance. In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the second layer <b>23</b> material is overlaid on the previously patterned first layer <b>22</b> material. To facilitate void free coverage of first layer <b>22</b> by second layer <b>23</b> down into central slot <b>24</b>, central slot <b>24</b> may be formed with side walls tapering from bottom to top. Preferably central slot <b>24</b> is formed to an average width W<sub>S </sub>which is less than three times the thickness h<sub>1 </sub>of first layer <b>22</b>, i. e. W<sub>S</sub><3h<sub>1</sub>. Coverage of features in first layer <b>22</b> having aspect ratios of height to width of 1:3 is within the capability of MEMS fabrication process methods.
Uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> is illustrated in FIG. 12 to extend to a length L<sub>H </sub>which is longer than central slot <b>24</b> length L<sub>S</sub>. The electrical current path through the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> will extend outward from the end of central slot <b>24</b> to a distance approximately equal to the width of the straight arm portions of the current path. The straight arm portions of the current path are approximately as wide as ½ W, where W is the width of the uniform resistor portion of the first layer <b>22</b> and the central slot width W<sub>S </sub>is small compared to W, W<sub>S</sub><<W. Thus, for the geometries illustrated in FIG. 12, L<sub>H</sub>≈L<sub>S</sub>+½ W.
It is useful to analyze first layer <b>22</b> designs in terms of the fractional length, F, of the uniform resistor portion L<sub>H </sub>as compared to the extended length L of the cantilevered element <b>20</b>, where F=L<sub>H</sub>/L. In order to select an optimized design for first layer <b>22</b>, it is useful to calculate the peak temperature, ΔT, needed to achieve a desired deflection, D, of the free end <b>27</b> of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> as a function of the fractional length, F. ΔT is measured as the temperature increase above the base or ambient operating temperature. It is also useful to examine the amount of input energy, ΔQ, needed to achieve a desired deflection, D, as a function of the fractional heater length, F.
FIG. 12<i>a </i>illustrates a first layer <b>22</b> design wherein the fractional heater length F=⅔. FIG. 12<i>b </i>illustrates a design having F=⅓.
The present inventions may be understood by a geometrical analysis of the deflection of cantilevered element <b>20</b> when a portion is heated uniformly causing bending. FIG. 13 illustrates an idealized cantilevered element <b>20</b>, the free end <b>27</b> of which has been deflected an amount D. The deflection D is caused by an elongation of a uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, extending a length L<sub>H </sub>from an anchor location <b>14</b> of base element <b>10</b>. The cantilevered element <b>20</b> has an extended length, L, of which the heated portion length, L<sub>H</sub>, is a fraction, L<sub>H</sub><L. When uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> is heated, the first layer <b>22</b> extends an amount ΔL<sub>H </sub>relative to the second layer <b>23</b> (see FIG. <b>4</b>).
The mismatch of length between first layer <b>22</b> and second layer <b>23</b> will occur over a thickness through the layers. For the purpose of understanding the present inventions, it is sufficient to analyze the heated uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> as a beam formed into a parabolic shape by the stresses of the thermal expansion mismatch ΔL<sub>H </sub>between layers <b>22</b> and <b>23</b>.
In FIG. 13, the shape of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> is shown for the case where a uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> having a length L<sub>H </sub>is heated to have a temperature ΔT above an ambient or base operating temperature, T<sub>base</sub>. The heated portion will be formed into a parabolic arc shape as indicated in FIG. <b>13</b>. The unheated free end portion <b>27</b> of cantilevered element <b>20</b> extends from the end of the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> as a straight segment tangent to the parabolic arc. The angle Θ of free end portion <b>27</b> can be found by evaluating the slope of the parabolic arc shape at the distance x=L<sub>H</sub>. The total deflection D of free end portion <b>27</b> is the sum of a deflection component D<sub>1 </sub>arising from the heated uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> and a deflection component D<sub>2 </sub>arising from the angular extension of the unheated portion:
<maths><formula-text><i>D=D</i><sub>1</sub><i>+D</i><sub>2</sub>. (1)</formula-text></maths>
The shape of the heated portion of cantilevered element <b>20</b> is calculated by finding the mechanical centerline D<sub>c</sub>(x) as a function of the distance x from the fixed point at anchor location <b>14</b>. The mechanical centerline is indicated by the line D<sub>c </sub>in FIG. <b>13</b>. The equation for the mechanical centerline D<sub>c</sub>(x) of a two-layer beam, having unequal thermal expansion coefficients, and in equilibrium at a temperature ΔT above a base temperature at which the beam is flat, is as follows:
<maths><formula-text><i>D</i><sub>c</sub>(<i>x</i>)=<i>cΔTx</i><sup>2</sup>/2. (2)</formula-text></maths>
Where, <maths><math><mtable><mtr><mtd><mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mi>G</mi></mfrac><mo></mo><mrow><mo>{</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><mrow><msubsup><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>a</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>a</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mfrac></mrow><mo>}</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></mtd><mtd><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><mrow><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>a</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>σ</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>a</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></mfrac></mrow><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>σ</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></mfrac></mrow></mfrac></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></mtd><mtd><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><mrow><mrow><mi>G</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>y</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup><mo>+</mo><msubsup><mi>y</mi><mi>c</mi><mn>3</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><mrow><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo>[</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>y</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow><mo>-</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>-</mo><msub><mi>y</mi><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mfrac></mrow></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></mtd><mtd><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>5</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><mrow><mrow><msub><mi>y</mi><mi>c</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><msubsup><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo></mo><mrow><mo>[</mo><mrow><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>]</mo></mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo></mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mfrac></mrow><mrow><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></mfrac><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo></mo><msub><mi>h</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></mfrac></mrow></mfrac></mrow><mo>,</mo></mrow></mtd><mtd><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>6</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mtd></mtr></mtable></math><img id="EMI-M00001" file="US06631979-20031014-M00001.TIF" img-content="math" img-format="tif" alt="embedded image" /><attachments><attachment idref="MATHEMATICA-00001" attachment-type="nb" file="US06631979-20031014-M00001.NB" /></attachments></maths>
and E<sub>j</sub>, h<sub>j </sub>and σ<sub>j </sub>are the Young's modulus, the thickness, and the Poisson's ratio of the j<sup>th </sup>layer (j=1,2). The term G is referred to as the flexural rigidity. The terms α<sub>1 </sub>and α<sub>2 </sub>are the coefficients of thermal expansion of the first layer and the second layer respectively. The important quantity (cΔT) is termed the thermal moment of the two-layer structure.
Deflection component D<sub>1 </sub>is found by evaluating Equation 2 for x=L<sub>H</sub>:
<maths><formula-text><i>D</i><sub>1</sub><i>=D</i><sub>c</sub>(<i>L</i><sub>H</sub>)=<i>cΔTL</i><sub>H</sub><sup>2</sup>/2. (7)</formula-text></maths>
The end of the beam extends in a straight-line tangent to the parabola at the point, x=L<sub>H</sub>. The slope of this straight line extension, tan Θ, is the derivative of Equation 2, evaluated at x=L<sub>H</sub>. Therefore:
<maths><formula-text><i>D</i><sub>2</sub>=(<i>L−L</i><sub>H</sub>)sin Θ, (8)</formula-text></maths>
<maths><formula-text>tan Θ=<i>cΔTL</i><sub>H</sub>, (9)</formula-text></maths>
<maths><formula-text><i>D</i><sub>2</sub>≈(<i>L−L</i><sub>H</sub>)tan Θ, (10)</formula-text></maths>
<maths><formula-text><i>D</i><sub>2</sub><i>cΔTL</i><sub>H</sub>(<i>L−L</i>). (11)</formula-text></maths>
Because Θ is small, sin Θ≈tan Θ to second order in Θ. Thus, substituting Equations 7 and 11 into Equation 2 the total deflection D is found:
<maths><formula-text><i>D≈cΔT</i>(2<i>L</i><sub>H</sub><i>L−L</i><sub>H</sub><sup>2</sup>)/2. (12)</formula-text></maths>
In order to understand the benefits and consequences of forming fractional length uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, it is useful to compare to a nominal design case. For the nominal design case, it is assumed that the application of the thermal actuator requires that the deflection D be a nominal amount D<sub>0</sub>. Further, it is determined that, if the full cantilevered element <b>20</b> length L is resistively heated, L<sub>H</sub>=L, F=1.0, then a temperature difference of ΔT<sub>0 </sub>must be established by an electrical pulse. That is, the nominal deflection for a full length heater is
<i>D</i><sub>0</sub><i>≈cL</i><sup>2</sup><i>ΔT</i><sub>0</sub>/2. (13)
Deflection Equation 12 may be formulated in terms of the fractional heater length, F=L<sub>H</sub>/L, and the above nominal deflection D<sub>0</sub>, as follows:
<maths><formula-text><i>D≈F</i>(2<i>−F</i>)<i>D</i><sub>0</sub><i>ΔT/ΔT</i><sub>0</sub> (14)</formula-text></maths>
Equation 14 shows the relationship between the peak temperature that must be reached in order to achieve an amount of deflection when the heated portion of the cantilevered element is a fraction F of the overall extended length L. The trade-off between peak temperature and fractional heater length may be understood by examining Equation 14 for the case where the deflection D is set equal to a constant nominal amount, D<sub>0</sub>, needed by the device application of the thermal actuator:
<maths><formula-text>Δ<i>T≈ΔT</i><sub>0</sub><i>/F</i>(2<i>−F</i>) (15)</formula-text></maths>
Equation 15 is plotted as curve <b>210</b> in FIG. <b>14</b>. ΔT is plotted in units of ΔT<sub>0</sub>. This relationship shows that as the fractional heater length F is reduced from F=1, the amount of temperature difference required to achieve the desired cantilever element deflection, D<sub>0</sub>, increases. For a fractional heater length F=⅓ as is illustrated in FIG. 12<i>b</i>, the temperature difference must be approximately 70% greater than for the 100% heater length nominal case. For the F=⅔ case illustrated in FIG. 12<i>a</i>, ΔT must be approximately 20% greater than ΔT<sub>0</sub>. Hence, it can be understood from Equation 15, and curve <b>210</b> in FIG. 14, that reducing the heated portion of the cantilevered element comes at the expense of supporting higher peak temperatures in the device. The materials of the thermal actuator and any fluids used with the actuator will have failure modes that limit the practical peak temperatures than can be used. When attempting to reduce the fractional heater length to a minimum, at some point, an unreliable level of the peak temperature will be required and further heater length reduction will be impractical.
An important benefit of reducing the heated portion of a cantilevered element thermal actuator arises from the energy reduction that may be realized. The pulse of energy added to the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>, ΔQ, raises the temperature by ΔT. That is, to first order:
<maths><formula-text>Δ<i>Q=m</i><sub>1</sub><i>C</i><sub>1</sub><i>ΔT,</i> (16)</formula-text></maths>
<maths><formula-text><i>m</i><sub>1</sub>=ρ<sub>1</sub><i>h</i><sub>1</sub><i>WFL.</i> (17)</formula-text></maths>
where m<sub>1</sub>, is the mass of the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> of first layer <b>22</b>. ρ<sub>1 </sub>is the density of the electrically resistive material used to construct first layer <b>22</b>. h<sub>1</sub>, W, and FL are the thickness, width and length of the volume of first layer <b>22</b> material that is initially heated by the electrical energy pulse. C<sub>1</sub>, is the specific heat of the first layer <b>22</b> electrically resistive material.
The amount of energy needed for the nominal design where L<sub>H</sub>=L, F=1.0, is then:
<maths><formula-text>Δ<i>Q</i><sub>0</sub><i>=C</i><sub>1</sub>ρ<sub>1</sub><i>h</i><sub>1</sub><i>WLΔT</i><sub>0</sub>. (18)</formula-text></maths>
Equation (18) may be expressed in normalized form as follows:
<maths><formula-text>Δ<i>Q≈FΔQ</i><sub>0</sub><i>ΔT/ΔT</i><sub>0</sub>, (19)</formula-text></maths>
<maths><formula-text>Δ<i>Q≈ΔQ</i><sub>0</sub>/(2<i>−F</i>). (20)</formula-text></maths>
Equation 20 describes the tradeoff between energy input and fractional heater length. The input pulse energy ΔQ normalized by the nominal input pulse energy ΔQ<sub>0 </sub>is plotted as curve <b>212</b> in FIG. <b>14</b>. Curve <b>212</b> shows that the energy needed declines as the fractional heater length is decreased. Even though the material in the heated portion must be raised to a higher temperature difference, ΔT, less material is heated. Therefore, a net saving of input pulse energy can be realized by reducing the fractional heater length. For example, the F=⅔ heater configuration illustrated in FIG. 12<i>a </i>requires 25% less energy than the nominal case of F=1. The F=⅓ heater configuration illustrated in FIG. 12<i>b </i>requires 40% less energy than the nominal case.
Operating a thermal actuator of fractional heater length according to the present invention allows less input energy to be used to accomplish the needed amount of deflection. Less energy use has many system advantages including power supply savings, driver circuitry expense, device size and packaging advantages.
For thermally actuated devices such as liquid drop emitters, the reduced input energy also translates into improved drop repetition frequency. The cool down period of a thermal actuator is often the rate limiting physical effect governing drop repetition frequency. Using less energy to cause an actuation reduces the time required to dissipate the input heat energy, returning to a nominal actuator position.
Using a fractional length uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> is additionally beneficial in that the major portion of the input heat energy resides closer to the substrate base element <b>10</b>, thereby allowing quicker heat conduction from the cantilevered element <b>20</b> to the base element <b>10</b> at the end of each actuation. The time constant τ for heat conduction from the cantilevered element may be understood to first order by a using a one-dimensional analysis of the heat conduction. Such an analysis finds that the time constant is proportional to the square of the heat flow path length. Thus, the heat conduction time constant for a uniform resistor portion <b>25</b> of length L<sub>H</sub>=FL will be proportional to F<sup>2</sup>:
<maths><formula-text>τ<sub>F</sub><i>∝F</i><sup>2</sup>τ<sub>0</sub>, (21)</formula-text></maths>
Where τ<sub>0 </sub>is the heat conduction time constant for the nominal case of a full length heater. Hence, the required time for the actuator cool down period can be improved significantly by reducing the fractional length of the uniform resistor portion <b>25</b>. Reduction in the conduction heat transfer time constant, which occurs proportionally to F<sup>2</sup>, is an important system benefit when using of fractional length heater thermal actuators according to the present inventions.
By reducing the input energy needed per actuation and improving the speed of heat transfer via conduction, a lower temperature baseline may be maintained when repeated actuations are needed. With lower input energy, multiple pulses may be supported, allowing the beginning temperature to rise between pulses, but still maintain the device temperature below some upper failure limit.
Curves <b>210</b> and <b>212</b> in FIG. 14 illustrate that there is a system trade-off involved when choosing a reduced heater length to cause the required amount of deflection. Shorter heater lengths allow reduced energy input but require higher peak temperatures which may cause reliability problems. In many systems, the percentage savings in energy and the percentage increase in temperature are approximately equal in the system impact in terms of cost and reliability. An optimization of these two quantities may be understood by forming a product of the two. A desirable energy reduction in ΔQ is calibrated by the undesirable increase in required temperature above the base operating temperature, ΔT.
A system optimization function, S, may be formed as a function of fractional heater length, F, from Equations 15 and 20 as follows:
<maths><formula-text><i>S</i>(<i>F</i>)=Δ<i>Q</i>(<i>F</i>)×Δ<i>T</i>(<i>F</i>), (22)</formula-text></maths>
<maths><formula-text><i>S</i>(<i>F</i>)=Δ<i>Q</i><sub>0</sub><i>ΔT</i><sub>0</sub><i>/F</i>(2<i>−F</i>)<sup>2</sup>. (23)</formula-text></maths>
The system optimization function S of Equation 23 is plotted as curve <b>214</b> in FIG. <b>14</b>. It has been normalized to have units of ΔQ<sub>0</sub>ΔT<sub>0</sub>. It can be seen from curve <b>214</b> that the system optimization, S, improves to a minimum, S<sub>m</sub>, and then increases as the required ΔT becomes large compared to the savings in ΔQ. The minimum in the system optimization function, S<sub>m</sub>, is found as the value of F for which the derivative of S is zero:
<maths><formula-text><i>dS/dF</i>=(3<i>F</i>−2)/<i>F</i><sup>2</sup>(2<i>−F</i>)<sup>3</sup>. (24)</formula-text></maths>
dS/dF=0, when F=F<sub>m</sub>=⅔. Therefore, choosing F=⅔ optimizes the design for energy savings in percentage terms as calibrated by an increase in the required temperature excursion above the base operating temperature, also in percentage terms.
It may be understood from the relations plotted in FIG. 14 that the thermal actuator system benefits from energy reduction at a faster rate than it loses due to peak temperature increases, when 1>F>⅔. Below F=⅔, the rate of increase in peak temperature is faster than the rate of decline in input pulse energy. At F=½, the percentage of peak temperature increase, 33%, is equal to the percentage of pulse energy reduction, also 33%.
For F<½, the percentage amount of peak temperature increase is larger than the percentage of pulse energy reduction. The amount of required temperature increase, in percentage terms, is double that of the nominal case when F˜0.3. The operating temperature requirement increases rapidly below this fractional length, nearly tripling for F˜0.2. From FIG. <b>14</b> and Equations 15 and 20, it may be understood that for F<0.3, the energy savings are increasing only a few percentage points while the required temperature is doubling and tripling. Such large increases in operating temperature are severely limiting to the materials which may be used form and assemble the thermal actuator and also may severely limit the compositions of liquids which may necessarily contact the thermal actuator in liquid drop emitter embodiments of the present inventions. Therefore, according to the present inventions, fractional heater lengths are selected such that F>0.3 in order to avoid device and system reliability failures caused by excessive operating temperatures.
A system design which balances energy reduction with peak temperature increase is found by selecting a fractional heater length in the range: 0.3 L<L<sub>H</sub><0.7 L. This range is defined at the upper end by the fractional length which optimizes the gain in energy savings while minimizing the increase in operating temperature. The range is defined on the lower end by the point at which the operating temperature increase has doubled over the full length heater case and further gains in energy reduction are very small compared to the rapid increases in required operating temperatures.
The cantilevered elements discussed heretofore used an electrically resistive material first layer <b>22</b> which extended for substantially the full extended length of the cantilevered element <b>20</b>. This configuration is desirable for reasons of mechanical strength and heat transfer during the cooling phase of the actuation cycle. However, the present invention may also be practiced whereby reduced heater length is configured as a reduced length of the electrically resistive layer <b>22</b>. This alternative embodiment is illustrated as FIG. 15<i>b</i>. The configuration of FIG. 15<i>b </i>has a heated portion <b>25</b> of the cantilevered element <b>20</b> which is truncated so that only the support second layer <b>23</b> forms the free end portion <b>27</b>. The heretofore discussed configuration with a substantially full length layer of electrically resistive material is shown for comparison as FIG. 15<i>a. </i>
The two configurations illustrated in FIG. 15 are expected to exhibit approximately the same amount of deflection D since they have the same values for all of the relevant parameters in Equations 1-14. However, the configuration of FIG. 15<i>b </i>will not cool as rapidly when used to displace a fluid nor can heat from free end portion <b>27</b> be easily conducted away from the cantilevered element. Also, the strength of the free end configuration of FIG. 15<i>b </i>will be less than that of configuration FIG. 15<i>a</i>. This weakness is potentially a source of actuator failure due to breakage in a fluid drop emitter device or other application where the free end moves a mass of liquid or other material. A partial length heater material configuration as illustrated in FIG. 15<i>b </i>is a viable embodiment of the present invention for applications where free end tip mechanical weakness, and slower actuator repetition times, are acceptable.
While much of the foregoing description was directed to the configuration and operation of a single thermal actuator or drop emitter, it should be understood that the present invention is applicable to forming arrays and assemblies of multiple thermal actuators and drop emitter units. Also it should be understood that thermal actuator devices according to the present invention may be fabricated concurrently with other electronic components and circuits, or formed on the same substrate before or after the fabrication of electronic components and circuits.
From the foregoing, it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to obtain all of the ends and objects. The foregoing description of preferred embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modification and variations are possible and will be recognized by one skilled in the art in light of the above teachings. Such additional embodiments fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
PARTS LIST
<b>10</b> substrate base element
<b>12</b> liquid chamber
<b>13</b> gap between cantilevered element and chamber wall
<b>14</b> cantilevered element anchor location
<b>15</b> thermal actuator
<b>16</b> liquid chamber curved wall portion
<b>20</b> cantilevered element
<b>21</b> passivation layer
<b>22</b> first layer
<b>23</b> second layer
<b>24</b> central slot forming uniform resistor portion
<b>25</b> cantilevered element uniform resistor portion
<b>26</b> cantilevered element anchor end portion
<b>27</b> cantilevered element free end portion
<b>28</b> liquid chamber structure, walls and cover
<b>29</b> passivation layer
<b>30</b> nozzle
<b>41</b> TAB lead
<b>42</b> electrical input pad
<b>43</b> solder bump
<b>44</b> electrical input pad
<b>50</b> drop
<b>60</b> working fluid
<b>80</b> support structure
<b>100</b> ink jet printhead
<b>110</b> drop emitter unit
<b>200</b> electrical pulse source
<b>300</b> controller
<b>400</b> image data source
<b>500</b> receiver
Contents6
17 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12 Sheet 13 Sheet 14 Sheet 15 Sheet 16 Sheet 17
Every citation, both waysCites: the store holds 19 of 20
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2004036741A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010231656A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7188931B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6767082B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US6817702B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2021236071A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US2007176971A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2007008373A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009073235A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7508294B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8721049B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7331650B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2007296766A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009237450A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6820964B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7283030B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009058902A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2005134648A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9839428B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7510269B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2004119784A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8322826B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2006109075A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7374274B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2005052496A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2011221307A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009160911A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7645027B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009058951A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8736145B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2004155932A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2004155935A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2006109309A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7175258B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2012268513A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7207656B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010165051A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8303092B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2006038854A9 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2005104933A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2004036739A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6824249B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2005052498A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7931351B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2004090495A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009153621A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7077490B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7922310B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7758170B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010277550A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8864287B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011073188A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2005130747A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7735972B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2005024438A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7125102B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7287834B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2006109314A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6860590B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7686430B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2007296539A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8513042B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2005100030A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Applicant |
| US2006038852A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2005225597A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7556352B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7510270B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2008094431A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010302320A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| EP1085219A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| EP1112848A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| JP20330543A | Cites | Japan | Applicant |
| US3747120A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US3946398A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4296421A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5599695A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5771882A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5781331A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5796152A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5902648A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6067797A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6087638A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6180427B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6239821B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6243113B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6254793B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6274056B1 | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| JPH0230543A | Cites | Japan | Applicant |
| US 2001/038403 Silverbrook Nov. 8, 2001.</STEXT> | Non-patent | – | Applicant |
8 members in 4 offices
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5099302 | United States of America | A | |
| US20020050993 | – | – | – |
Members8
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP1329319A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| US2003137560A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| JP2003260696A | Japan | A | |
| US6631979B2This record | United States of America | B2 | |
| EP1329319B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE60305985D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE60305985T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| JP4531336B2 | Japan | B2 |
40 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed without a rejection on record.
- Non-final rejections
- 0
- Final rejections
- 0
- RCEs
- 0
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Expire PatentEXP. | EXP. | |
| Post Issue Communication - Certificate of CorrectionN423 | N423 | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant MailedPGM/ | PGM/ | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowedPTAC | PTAC | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowedWPIR | WPIR | |
| Adjustment of PTA Calculation by PTOP028 | P028 | |
| Receipt into PubsR1021 | R1021 | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for IssuePILS | PILS | |
| Receipt into PubsR1021 | R1021 | |
| Mail Examiner's Amendment | – | |
| Mail Examiner's Amendment | – | |
| Examiner's Amendment Communication | – | |
| Examiner's Amendment Communication | – | |
| Issue Fee Payment VerifiedN084 | N084 | |
| Issue Fee Payment ReceivedIFEE | IFEE | |
| Receipt into PubsR1021 | R1021 | |
| Workflow - Informational Disclosure Statement - FinishFIDS | FIDS | |
| Workflow - Informational Disclosure Statement - BeginBIDS | BIDS | |
| Workflow - File Sent to ContractorSENT | SENT | |
| Receipt into PubsR1021 | R1021 | |
| Dispatch to PublicationsD1220 | D1220 | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowedMN/=. | MN/=. | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowedN/=. | N/=. | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU | – | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU | – | |
| Dispatch from OIPE to Corps - U-P-R-D ApplicationD5001 | D5001 | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Preliminary AmendmentA.PE | A.PE | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security Review | – | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security Review | – | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | – | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | – | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | – | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | – | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX | |
| Workflow - Drawings FinishedDRWF | DRWF | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
45 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance feeLapsedFP | FP | |
| Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH | STCH | |
| Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH | STCH | |
| Lapse for failure to pay maintenance feesLapsedLAPS | LAPS | |
| Maintenance fee reminder mailedREMI | REMI | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Certificate of correctionCC | CC | |
| Fee payment procedurePAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYFEPP | FEPP | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication, DOCDB
- 6631979
- Publication, EPODOC
- US6631979
- Application
- 10050993
- Application, DOCDB
- 5099302
- Application, EPODOC
- US20020050993
Titles
- English
- Thermal actuator with optimized heater length
Patent term adjustment
- A delay
- +29 daysthe office missed an examination deadline
- Net adjustment
- 0 days
Classification
- CPC, 1
- B41J2/14427
- IPC, 5
- B41J2 055
- B41J2 14
- B41J2 16
- B41J2 045
- B81B3 00
- USPC, 4
- 347054000
- 347048000
- 347061000
- 347065000