System for detecting unevenness degree of surface of semiconductor device
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
In a system for detecting a degree of unevenness of a surface of a semiconductor device, the surface is irradiated with light having a wavelength of approximately 240 nm to 500 nm. The degree of unevenness of the surface is determined in accordance with an intensity of reflected light from the surface.

Term
Term ended
Expired 14 March 2016, 10.5 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
13 claims: 2 independent, 11 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 70, broad(NHIP)A system for detecting a degree of unevenness of a surface of a semiconductor device having a hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon formed on a surface thereof, comprising:means for measuring an intensity of reflected light from said surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon;and means for determining the degree of unevenness of said surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon in accordance with a stored relationship between the intensity of reflected light and the unevenness degree of said surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon, using only the measured intensity of reflected light from the surface of said semiconductor device.
- 7An apparatus for manufacturing a semiconductor device, having hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon formed on a surface thereof, comprising:a CVD chamber for mounting said semiconductor device;gas introducing and exhausting means for introducing source gas into said chamber and exhausting the source gas from said chamber, heating means for heating said semiconductor device;a light source for irradiating the surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon with light having a wavelength of approximately 240 nm to 500 nm;and a detector for detecting the intensity of reflected light from the surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon and for determining the degree of unevenness of said surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon in accordance with a stored relationship between the intensity of reflected light and the unevenness degree of the surface of said hemispherical-grain polycrystalline silicon using only the intensity of reflected light from the surface of said semiconductor device, said light source and said detector being located so as to not be directly heated by said heating means.
Independent claims2
57 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a system for detecting a degree of unevenness of a surface of a semiconductor device such as a dynamic random access memory (DRAM) device.
2. Description of the Related Art
As DRAM devices have been more developed, a cell area has also been more decreased, and accordingly, the capacity of a cell capacitor has been more decreased. As a result, the DRAM devices are subject to soft errors caused by α-rays.
In order to increase the capacity of a cell capacitor, a staked capacitor having a hemispherical-grain (HSG) polycrystalline silicon electrode is known (see: H. Watanabe et al., "A New Stacked Capacitor Structure Using Hemispherical-Grain (HSG) Poly-Silicon Electrodes", Ext. Abs. 22nd Conference on Solid State Device and Materials. pp. 873-876, 1990). That is, use is made of a thermal migration phenomenon of silicon atoms to thereby make an electrode surface uneven, thus increasing the capacity of the cell capacitor. In this case, the degree of unevenness of the electrode surface depends upon the natural oxide thereof, and accordingly, the capacity of the cell capacitor may fluctuate. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate or detect a degree of unevenness of the electrode surface.
In a first prior art method for detecting a degree of unevenness of a electrode surface, the degree of unevenness is observed directly by an electron microscopy. In the first prior art method, however, an observed area is very small, so that it is actually impossible to observe the entire semiconductor device (or wafer). Also, an electron microscopy capable of observing the wafer without splitting it is generally used for measuring a length and has a resolution of about 300 nm, and it is impossible to observe a semispherical grain having a radius of about 5 nm.
In a second prior art method for detecting a degree of unevenness of an electrode surface, a capacitor is actually formed by an electrode, and the degree of unevenness of the electrode surface is estimated by measuring the capacity of the capacitor. Although the obtained degree of unevenness is accurate, it is time-consuming to form the capacitor for the estimation of the degree of unevenness of the electrode surface.
In a third prior art method for detecting a degree of unevenness of an electrode surface, the degree of unevenness of the electrode surface is estimated by qualitatively measuring the electrode surface using an absorption method such as a gas absorption BET scanning method. In the third prior art method, however, since gas is absorbed into the DRAM devices, the characteristics of the DRAM devices are changed.
In a fourth prior art method for detecting a degree of unevenness of an electrode surface, X-rays are irradiated so as to be incident at an angle less than a critical angle of total reflection on the electrode surface, and an intensity of secondary X-rays from the electrode surface is measured, thus determining the unevenness of the electrode surface. In the fourth prior art method, however, it is impossible to reduce a measured spot. Also, the X-rays excite electrons in the DRAM devices, and particularly, the X-rays create electron-hole pairs in channel regions under the electrode surface. Thus, the characteristics of the DRAM devices are deteriorated.
In a fifth prior art method for detecting a degree of unevenness of an electrode surface, white light is incident on the electrode surface, and an intensity of reflected light from the electrode surface is measured, thus determining the unevenness of the electrode surface. In the fifth prior art method, however, since the reflected light is dependent upon the properties of amorphous silicon of the electrode, the reliability of the detected degree of unevenness is low.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an easy and reliable system for detecting a degree of unevenness of a surface of a semiconductor device, which would not affect the characteristics of the device.
According to the present invention, in a system for detecting a degree of unevenness of a surface of a semiconductor device, the surface is irradiated with light having a wavelength of approximately 240 nm to 500 nm. The degree of unevenness of the surface is determined in accordance with an intensity of reflected light from the surface.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be more clearly understood from the description as set forth below, as compared with the prior art, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIGS. 1A through 1F are cross-sectional views showing a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device having an HSG polycrystalline silicon electrode;
FIGS. 2A and 2B are photographs showing examples of HSG polycrystalline silicon;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing light reflectance characteristics of amorphous silicon and HSG polycrystalline silicon;
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a first embodiment of the unevenness detecting system according to the present invention;
FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and 5E are diagrams showing the states of HSG polycrystalline silicon grown on the wafer of FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 is a diagram of the reflectance characteristics and the capacitance characteristics of the HSG polycrystalline silicon of FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and 5E;
FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D and 7E are diagrams showing the states of HSG polycrystalline silicon grown on the wafer of FIG. 4;
FIG. 8 is a diagram of the reflectance characteristics and the capacitance characteristics of the HSG polycrystalline silicon of FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D and 7E;
FIG. 9 is a graph showing a linear relationship between the reflectance and capacitance of HSG polycrystalline silicon according to the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of a semiconductor device for explaining a modification of the first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a second embodiment of the unevenness detecting system according to the present invention;
FIG. 12 is a timing diagram of the light reflectance characteristics of the wafer of FIG. 11;
FIGS. 13A, 13B, 13C and 13D are photographs showing the states of HSG polycrystalline silicon grown on the wafer of FIG. 11;
FIG. 14 is a diagram of the capacitance characteristics of the HSG polycrystalline silicon of FIGS. 13A, 13B, 13C and 13D; and
FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating a third embodiment of the unevenness detecting system according to the resent invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Before the description of the preferred embodiments, a prior art method for manufacturing a semiconductor device will be explained with reference to FIGS. 1A through 1F.
First, referring to FIG. 1A, a P<sup>-</sup> -type monocrystalline silicon substrate 101 is thermally oxidized to form a field silicon oxide layer 102. Then, a gate electrode 103 is formed via a gate silicon oxide layer on the substrate 101. Then, N<sup>+</sup> -type impurity diffusion regions 104 and 105 are formed within the substrate 101 using the gate electrode 103 as a mask. Then, an insulating layer 106 is formed on the entire surface.
Next, referring to FIG. 1B, a contact hole 107 is perforated in the insulating layer 106 by a photolithography and etching process. Then, a phosphorus-doped amorphous silicon layer 108 is deposited by a low pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) process.
Next, referring to FIG. 1C, the amorphous silicon layer 108 is patterned by a photolithography and etching process, to form an amorphous silicon pattern 108a.
Next, referring to FIG. 1D, an HSG polycrystalline silicon layer 109 is grown on the amorphous silicon pattern 108a. That is, the device is put in a chamber at a temperature of about 580° C. and at a pressure of 1 mTorr. Then, a gas of Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is supplied to the chamber for about 10 minutes, and thereafter, a gas of N<sub>2</sub> is supplied to the chamber for about 30 minutes. Thus, the HSG polycrystalline silicon layer 109 having an uneven surface is formed on the amorphous silicon pattern 108a, to substantially increase the surface of the capacitor electrode 108a.
Next, referring to FIG. 1E, a capacitor insulating layer 110 made of silicon oxide is formed on the HSG polycrystalline silicon layer 109.
Finally, referring to FIG. 1F, a counter plate electrode 111 made of polycrystalline silicon is formed on the capacitor insulating layer 110.
Thus, a cell capacitor is formed by a lower electrode (108a, 109) an upper electrode (111) and an insulating layer (110) therebetween.
As explained above, the HSG polycrystalline silicon layer 109 is grown by using a thermal migration phenomenon of silicon atoms. Therefore, if a natural oxide layer on the amorphous silicon pattern 108a is completely removed before the forming of the HSG polycrystalline silicon layer 109, large hemispherical grains as shown in FIG. 2A are formed. Contrary to this, if a natural oxide layer on the amorphous silicon pattern 108a is incompletely removed before the forming of the HSG polycrystalline silicon layer 109, small hemispherical grains as shown in FIG. 2B are formed.
In FIG. 3, which shows reflectance characteristics of amorphous silicon and HSG polycrystalline silicon, a dotted line indicates a light reflectance of amorphous silicon, and a solid line indicates a light reflectance of HSG polycrystalline silicon deposited on the amorphous silicon. In a wavelength range of light from 240 nm to 550 nm, as the wavelength is increased, the light reflectance of the amorphous silicon and the light reflectance of the HSG polycrystalline silicon are both monotonously decreased. This is because the light absorption coefficient of the amorphous silicon is very large, and accordingly, incident light is mostly absorbed in the amorphous silicon. The thicker the amorphous silicon, the larger the fluctuation of reflectance. Also, the larger the crystal ratio of the amorphous silicon, the larger the fluctuation of reflectance. That is, the smaller the refractive index of the amorphous silicon, the larger the fluctuation of reflectance.
However, in a wavelength range of light from 550 nm to 750 nm, the light reflectance of the amorphous silicon and the light reflectance of the HSG polycrystalline silicon both greatly fluctuate. This is because reflected light from the upper surface of the amorphous silicon interferes with reflected light from an interface between the amorphous silicon and its underlying layer such as the insulating layer 106.
Thus, use is made of light having a wavelength from approximately 240 nm to 500 nm, thus detecting a degree of unevenness of a surface of the HSG polycrystalline silicon, without being subject to the properties and thickness of the amorphous silicon and its underlying layer.
In FIG. 4, which illustrates a first embodiment of the unevenness detecting system according to the present invention, reference numeral 1 designates a stage for mounting a semiconductor device which is, in this case, a wafer 2. Also, an optical system 3 receives light having a wavelength of about 240 nm to 500 nm from a light source 4 and irradiates the wafer 2 with this light. Also, the optical system 3 receives reflected light from the wafer 2 and transmits it to a spectroscope 5 which is connected to a data processing unit 6. The data processing unit 6 is comprised of a computer connected to an input/output unit 7.
FIGS. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and 5E are diagrams showing the states of HSG polycrystalline silicon grown on the wafers 2 (2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D and 2-E) of FIG. 4. In FIGS. 5A to 5E, note that the light source 4 and the spectroscope 5 are located opposite to each other for easily understanding the light reflectance. The wafers 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D and 2-E have the same amorphous silicon layer (not shown) thereon. The wafers 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D and 2-E are put in a chamber at a temperature of about 580° C. and at a pressure of about 1 mTorr. Then, a gas of Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is supplied for 0, 5, 10, 15 and 18 minutes for the wafers 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D and 2-E, respectively, and thereafter, a gas of N<sub>2</sub> is supplied for 10 minutes. As a result, as illustrated in FIG. 5A, 5B and 5C, as the supplying time of Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is increased, the density of HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased, so that the surface area of the HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased. In this case, as shown in FIG. 6, the light reflectance is decreased and the capacitance of a capacitor using the HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased. On the other hand, as illustrated in FIGS. 5D and 5E, as the supplying time of Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is further increased, the size of HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased, so that the surface area of the HSG polycrystalline silicon is decreased. In this case, as shown in FIG. 6, the reflectance is increased and the capacitance of a capacitor using the HSG polycrystalline silicon is decreased.
FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D and 7E are diagrams showing the states of HSG polycrystalline silicon grown on the wafers 2 (2-A', 2-B', 2-C', 2-D' and 2-E') of FIG. 4. The wafers 2-A', 2-B', 2-C', 2-D' and 2-E' have the same amorphous silicon layer (not shown) thereon. The wafers 2-A', 2-B', 2-C', 2-D' and 2-E' are put in a chamber at a temperature of about 580° C. and at a pressure of about 1 mTorr. Then, a gas of Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is supplied for 3 minutes, and thereafter, a gas of N<sub>2</sub> is supplied for 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes for the wafers 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D and 2-E, respectively. As a result, as illustrated in FIG. 8A, 8B and 8C, as the supplying time of N<sub>2</sub> is increased, the density of HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased, so that the surface area of the HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased. In this case, as shown in FIG. 8, the light reflectance is decreased and the capacitance of a capacitor using the HSG polycrystalline silicon is increased. On the other hand, as illustrated in FIGS. 7D and 7E, as the supplying time of N<sub>2</sub> is further increased, the size of HSG polycrystalline silicon is not increased, so that the surface area of the HSG polycrystalline silicon is not decreased. In this case, as shown in FIG. 8, the light reflectance is unchanged and the capacitance of a capacitor using the HSG polycrystalline silicon is unchanged.
Thus, the light reflectance has a relationship to the unevenness degree of the surface of the HSG polycrystalline silicon, and the capacitance has a relationship to the unevenness degree of the surface of the HSG polycrystalline silicon. In more detail, as shown in FIG. 9, the light reflectance has a linear relationship to the capacitance, i.e., the unevenness of the surface of the HSG polycrystalline silicon. In the case as shown in FIG. 9, the data processing unit 6 stores a reference value 20% of the light reflectance, and determines whether or not an obtained light reflectance is less than 20%. If the obtained light reflectance is not less than 20%, the wafer is again processed for depositing HSG polycrystalline silicon on the wafer.
In the first embodiment, although observation of light reflectance is carried out by directly irradiating the HSG polycrystalline silicon surface with light having a wavelength of about 240 nm to 500 nm, this observation can be carried out by irradiating a silicon nitride layer formed on the HSG polycrystalline silicon surface with this light. That is, as illustrated in FIG. 10, after the formation of HSG polycrystalline silicon, a natural oxide layer on the HSG polycrystalline silicon is etched by diluted fluorine acid. Then, the HSG polycrystalline silicon is exposed in an atmosphere of NH<sub>3</sub> gas and is ramp-heated for 1 minute. As a result, an about 10 nm thick silicon nitride layer 1001 is formed on the HSG polycrystalline silicon. In this case, since the silicon nitride layer 1001 is very thin, the light reflectance is hardly changed,
Note that the silicon nitride layer 1001 can serve as a part of the capacitor insulating layer 110, and therefore, it is unnecessary to remove the silicon nitride layer 1001 in the post stages.
If the silicon nitride layer 1101 is not formed, the wafer has to be promptly subjected to the unevenness detecting system of FIG. 4, since natural oxide is formed on the HSG polycrystalline silicon to reduce the light reflectance. However, if the silicon nitride layer 1001 is formed, the wafer can be allowed to stand for a long time such as a week, since no natural oxide is formed on the HSG polycrystalline silicon.
In FIG. 11, which illustrates a second embodiment of the unevenness detecting system according to the present invention, a leaf-type chamber 1101 has a gas inlet 1102 and a gas outlet 1103. The chamber 1101 is also provided with a stage 1104 for mounting a wafer 1105, and a heater 1106. In the chamber 1101, light having a wavelength of about 240 run to 500 nm is irradiated so as to be incident to the wafer 1105, and reflected light from the wafer 1105 is detected by a detector 1108. The detector 1108 is connected to a data processing unit 1109 connected to an input/output unit 1110. Also, the gas inlet 1102 and the gas outlet 1103 are controlled by the data processing unit 1109.
The operation of the system of FIG. 11 is explained next with reference to FIG. 12.
First, from time t<sub>0</sub> to time t<sub>1</sub>, the wafer 1105 having amorphous silicon thereon is put on the stage 1104. Then, the chamber 1101 is exhausted by an exhaust system (not shown), and is heated to about 580° C. by the heater 1106.
Next, from time t<sub>1</sub> to time t<sub>2</sub> (t<sub>2</sub> -t<sub>1</sub> =about 10 minutes), a gas of Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is supplied from the gas inlet 1102 to the chamber 1101 for about ten minutes while maintaining the pressure with the chamber 1101 at about 1 mTorr.
At time t<sub>2</sub>, the Si<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub> is exhausted from the chamber 1101 via the gas outlet 1103, to begin an annealing operation using a gas of N<sub>2</sub>.
In the second embodiment, the light reflectance of the wafer 1105 is continuously observed by the light source 1107, the detector 1108 and the data processing unit 1109, thus enhancing the throughput. For example, at time t<sub>3</sub>, t<sub>4</sub> and t<sub>5</sub>, the light reflectance is gradually decreased. In this case, the size of the HSG polycrystalline silicon are gradually increased as shown in FIGS. 13A, 13B and 13C. Also, at time t<sub>6</sub>, the reflectance is unchanged, and the size of the HSG polycrystalline silicon is also unchanged as shown in FIG. 13D. Actually, the capacitance of capacitors formed by the wafers corresponding to the states at time t<sub>3</sub>, t<sub>4</sub>, t<sub>5</sub> and t<sub>6</sub>, are changed as shown in FIG. 14.
In FIG. 15, which illustrates a third embodiment of the unevenness detecting system according to the present invention, a batch-type chamber 1501 has a gas inlet 1502 and a gas outlet 1503. The chamber 1501 is also provided with a stage 1504 for mounting a wafer 1505, and a heater 1506. In the chamber 1501, light having a wavelength of about 240 nm to 500 nm is irradiated so as to be incident to the wafer 1505, and reflected light from the wafer 1505 is detected by a detector 1508. The detector 1508 is connected to a data processing unit 1509 connected to an input/output unit 1510.
The operation of the system of FIG. 15 is the same as that of the system of FIG. 11.
In the above-described embodiments, although light having a wavelength of about 240 μm to 500 μm is used, a line spectrum light such as 488 nm wavelength laser light can be used. Also, the present invention can be applied to measurement of unevenness degree of a surface other than an HSG polycrystalline silicon surface.
As explained hereinbefore, according to the present invention, a degree of unevenness of a surface of a semiconductor device can be easily and reliably detected without affecting the characteristics of the device.
Contents4
48 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12 Sheet 13 Sheet 14 Sheet 15 Sheet 16 Sheet 17 Sheet 18 Sheet 19 Sheet 20 Sheet 21 Sheet 22 Sheet 23 Sheet 24 Sheet 25 Sheet 26 Sheet 27 Sheet 28 Sheet 29 Sheet 30 Sheet 31 Sheet 32 Sheet 33 Sheet 34 Sheet 35 Sheet 36 Sheet 37 Sheet 38 Sheet 39 Sheet 40 Sheet 41 Sheet 42 Sheet 43 Sheet 44 Sheet 45 Sheet 46 Sheet 47 Sheet 48
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US6310688B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2005062961A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7911601B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6665065B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US6594013B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6342714B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7081953B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9234843B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6452678B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10480935B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6275295B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2003227630A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2006256328A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7656514B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US6750172B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| JP2007035991A | Cited by | Japan | Search report |
| US6951636B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2005123464A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7090815B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2011170092A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2007026594A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8149395B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6417928B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7679063B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6528436B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8451439B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7446866B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2007109543A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009066943A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6825933B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6275292B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US6327040B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2005072959A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6034778A | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US4511800A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US4547073A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US5125740A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US5134303A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| Device application and structureobservation for hemispherical grained Si Watanabe et al Journal of Applied Physics; vol. 71; No. 7; Apr. 1, 1992; pp. 3538 3543. | Non-patent | – | Search report |
6 members in 3 offices; this record represents the family
Priority claims1
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8348295 | Japan | A |
Members6
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPH08254415A | Japan | A | |
| KR960035886A | Republic of Korea | A | |
| JP2638554B2 | Japan | B2 | |
| US5796484AThis record | United States of America | A | |
| US5850288A | United States of America | A | |
| KR100195562B1 | Republic of Korea | B1 |
10 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance feeLapsedFP | FP | |
| Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH | STCH | |
| Lapse for failure to pay maintenance feesLapsedLAPS | LAPS | |
| Maintenance fee reminder mailedREMI | REMI | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Fee payment procedurePAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITYFEPP | FEPP | |
| AssignmentAS | AS | |
| Fee paymentFPAY | FPAY | |
| Certificate of correctionCC | CC | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 5796484
- Application
- 61587596
Titles
- English
- System for detecting unevenness degree of surface of semiconductor device
Classification
- CPC, 6
- G03F7/70483
- H10P74/203
- G01B11/306
- G01N21/9501
- G01N21/956
- H10P74/27
- IPC, 5
- G01B11 28
- G01B11 30
- G03F7 20
- H01L21 66
- H10B12 00