Moving-coil microphone arrangement

Aug. 31, 1965 _R. gOrike etal 3,204,031

MOVING-COIL, MICROPHONE ARRANGEMENT

Filed Aug. 29, 1961

Fig.l

<img file="US3204031A_D0001.tif" />

<img file="US3204031A_D0002.tif" />

<img file="US3204031A_D0003.tif" />

RUDOLF GORIKE KARL SCHUSTER

INVENTORS.

BY

<img file="US3204031A_D0004.tif" />

<img file="US3204031A_D0005.tif" />

AGENT

3,204,031

Patented Aug. 31,1965

United States Patent Office and 400 cycles. Owing to the mass loading of the diaphragm by the acoustic mass L of the associated transit time system, the natural frequency of the overall vibratory system is shifted in known manner toward the lower end of the acoustic band (e.g., 40 cycles). To increase ³ the pressure gradient, one or more tubes 10-30 centimeters long may be coupled to the diaphragm in known manner. In this case to constitute the analog of the inductive branch (L) of the system in the frequency response are not to be expected up to 500 to 1000 cycles. ¹⁰ The high-frequency microphone may also be optimally designed and have a relatively stiffly gripped diaphragm so as to exhibit a relatively elevated inherent resonant frequency (400-800 cycles). An acoustic transit-time system may be provided on the rear side of the diaphragm ¹³ (RC or LR system) to ensure a very smooth frequency response in the higher frequency range and a constant twoway damping.

The two microphones are advantageously arranged so that the low-frequency microphone lies behind the high²θ frequency microphone. A disturbing influence, due to mutual interference, upon the frequency response and directional pattern in the overlap range is not to be expected because the sound wave length in that range is a _ multiple of the selected distance between the microphones ^2o which, therefore, receive the incident acoustic waves at these (and lower) frequencies nearly in phase.

The electrical circuitry connecting the microphones may include electrical filters. The microphone outputs may be _o directly connected to a common amplifying channel, or individual amplifying channels may be provided which have outputs that are connected together. Such variations are basically known per se.

It will be understood that any desired frequency range „ can be divided according to the invention into adjoining subranges or bands associated with more than two microphones. Nor is the invention restricted to directional microphones; it is also applicable to pressure transmitters having an omnidirectional pattern.

An embodiment of the invention is diagrammatically illustrated in the accompanying drawing, in which:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the microphone arrangement;

FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of a high-frequency microphone provided with an analog RC system; and

FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of a low-frequency microphone provided with an analog LR system.

With reference to FIG. 1, a high-frequency microphone 1 and a low-frequency microphone 2 are secured in a common housing 3 and electrically connected together in series, and to an amplifier 4, via respective filters 21, 22 designed to suppress undesirable frequencies.

In FIG. 2, which illustrates a representative embodiment of high-frequency microphone 1, a shallow air chamber 5 is defined by a diaphragm 6 and a rear wall 12 comprising three acoustic frictional resistances (R) designated 7, 8 and 9. The resistances 7 and 9 lead to the outside air. The resistance 8 leads to a closed chamber 1© confined by a pot-shaped housing member 11 and constituting an acoustic capacitance (C).

In FIG. 3, showing a representative embodiment of low-frequency microphone 2, a shallow air chamber 13 is defined by a diaphragm 14 and a rear wall 15 comprising an acoustic frictional resistance (R), designated 16, °³ leading to a closed chamber 17 confined by a pot-shaped housing member 18. Chamber 17 contains a mass of air, larger than that present within chamber 10, which adjoins the rear side of the frictional resistance 16 and _ is otherwise separated from the outside air. Radially ^{0 outwardly of the chamber 17, tubes 19, which contain air columns acting as inertances or acoustic inductance equiv1

3,204,031

MOVING-COIL MICROPHONE ARRANGEMENT Rudolf Gorike and Karl Schuster, both of Vienna, Austria, assignors to Akustische U. Κϊηο-Gerate Gesellschaft BB.b .H., Vienna, Austria, a firm

Filed Aug. 29,1961, Ser. No. 134,669

Claims. (Cl. 179—1)

The necessity of causing sound waves to act on a diaphragm from both sides to achieve a directional pattern with moving-coil microphones involves difficulties if a wide frequency range is to be utilized. This is due to the fact that the requirement for mass retardation of the vibrating system (diaphragm) necessitates a sufficiently compliant mounting of the diaphragm (low restoring force). It has been found in practice that this results in an unsteady frequency response in the higher frequency range.

To provide dynamic microphone arrangements having a unidirectional pattern, two independent individual microphones, namely, a moving-coil pressure transmitter and a ribbon microphone, have been arranged one beside the other and electrically connected together. This resulted in a transformation of the omnidirectional and bidirectional patterns into a unidirectional pattern.

As contrasted therewith, the invention relates to a moving-coil microphone arrangement in which at least two mechanically independent individual microphones are arranged close to each other electrically connected together, and the individual microphones having substantially equal directional patterns and optimum frequency responses in different frequency ranges.

It is known to allocate different frequency ranges to two or more individual loudspeakers. This allocation has the purpose to obtain the necessary sound volume in the lower frequency range by the use of a sufficiently large diaphragm area and to obtain a propagation of sound at high frequencies in a wide angle by the use of a stiff diaphragm which is as small as possible.

According to the invention, the diaphragms are of substantially identical surface area but differ substantially in their mounting and the acoustic elements coupled to the diaphragm.

The low-frequency diaphragm has suitably coupled to its rear side the acoustic analog of a resistive-reactive transit-time system, specifically an LR system, whereas ⁴⁵the acoustic analog of another resistive-reactive transittime system, i.e., an RC system, is suitably coupled to the rear side of the high-frequency diaphragm. The analog of an LR system comprises an acoustic mass (L) in a duct which opens into a shallow air chamber behind the ⁵⁰diaphragm, this air chamber having connected to it an acoustic frictional resistance (R) which opens into a sufficiently large chamber shut off from the external sound field. The analog of an RC system comprises an air chamber (C) and an acoustic frictional resistance (R), both of which are coupled to the rear side of the diaphragm, the resistance leading to the external sound field. Both systems are known to provide the required phase shift and are referred to as transit-time systems. The high-frequency diaphragm may also have the analog of an LR system coupled to it. Both RC and LR analog systems may be coupled to one and the same diaphragm.

The point of division between the frequency ranges is suitably so selected that the high-frequency microphone begins to predominate where the frequency curve of the low-frequency microphone begins to become unsteady. In practice, this point of division will lie between 300 and 1000 cycles, depending on the design of the individual microphones.

The diaphragm of the low-frequency microphone may be gripped under such stress as to resonate between 120

3,204,031 alents (L), open into the air chamber 13 at the rear wall 15. At their other end, these tubes 19 open into the atmosphere. The air cushions 5 and 13 can, of course, also be considered as acoustic capacitances (C).

As will be seen from FIGS. 1-3, microphones 1 and 2 have their diaphragms 6, 14 facing in the same direction and centered on a common axis, these diaphragms spanning the open front ends of the microphone housings (whose rear ends are partly open into the atmosphere at 7 and 19). The diaphragm 14 of the low-frequency microphone 2 faces the rear of the high-frequency microphone 1, the two microphones being separated by a distance which, as previously pointed out, should be a fraction of the acoustic-wave length in the overlapping region of their respective frequency bands. Since the axial length of microphone 1 is less than that of microphone 2, as seen in FIGS. 2 and 3, this arrangement affords maximum flexibility in selecting the spacing of the two microphones from each other.

The diaphragms 6 and 14 are of the moving-coil type, yet their conventional coils and associated circuitry have not been illustrated.