Detection of a Metal or a Magnetic Object
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
A measuring apparatus for detecting a metal object includes two emission coils, a magnetoresistive measuring device, and a control device. The emission coils are configured to produce superimposed magnetic fields. The magnetoresistive measuring device is in the region of both magnetic fields, and is configured to emit an output signal which is dependent on the magnetic field. The control device is configured to supply the emission coils with alternating voltages such that the value of the alternating voltage component of the output signal, which is time synchronized with the alternating voltages, is minimized. The control device is further configured to detect the object when the ratio of the alternating voltages does not correspond to the distances between the magnetoresistive measuring device and the emission coils.

Term
Projected expiry 15 April 2031.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Today
- Projected expiry
11 claims: 2 independent, 9 dependent
- 1A measuring apparatus for detecting a metallic object, comprising:two transmitting coils configured to generate superimposed magnetic fields;a magnetoresistive measuring device (i) in the region of the two magnetic fields, and (ii) configured to provide an output signal dependent on the magnetic field;and a control device configured to supply the transmitting coils with alternating voltages in such a way that a magnitude of an AC voltage component, which is synchronous with the alternating voltages, of the output signal of the magnetoresistive measuring device is minimized, wherein the control device is configured to detect the metallic object if a ratio of the alternating voltages does not correspond to a ratio of distances of the magnetoresistive measuring device from the transmitting coils.
- 10Broadest claimClaim Score 68, broad(NHIP)A method for detecting a metallic object, comprising:supplying two transmitting coils with alternating voltages in order to generate superimposed magnetic fields;determining an output signal, which is dependent on magnetic field, of a magnetoresistive measuring apparatus in the region of the superimposed magnetic fields;wherein the supplying the transmitting coils with alternating voltages takes place in such a way that the magnitude of an AC voltage component, which is synchronous with the alternating voltages, of the output signal of the magnetoresistive measuring device is minimized;and detecting the metallic object if the ratio of the alternating voltages does not correspond to a ratio of the distances of the magnetoresistive measuring device from the transmitting coils.
Independent claims2
55 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
0001When performing certain types of work on workpieces, there is a risk that an object concealed in the workpiece may be damaged by the work. For example, when drilling into a wall, a water pipe, electrical cable, or gas line running inside the wall may be damaged. On the other hand, it may be desirable to perform the work in such a precise manner that work is also performed on an object concealed in the workpiece, for example, if the hole from the above example is to run through an iron reinforcement or a supporting structure inside the wall.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
0002Coil-based metal detectors for detecting such a concealed object are known in the art. Such detectors generate a magnetic field in a measurement region. If a metallic object is in the measurement region, the object is detected because of its influence on the generated magnetic field. To determine the generated magnetic field, at least two receiving coils are often used, which are oriented and connected to one another in such a way that the measurement signal provided jointly by both receiving coils approaches zero in the absence of a metallic object in the measurement region (differential measurement). In one variant, a plurality of transmitting coils is used to generate the magnetic field, the coils being activated in such a way that the measured signal in the two receiving coils approaches zero, independently of the presence of a metallic object in the measurement region (field-compensated measurement).
0003DE 10 2007 053 881 A1 discloses a measurement method for determining the position or the angle of a coil with respect to two other coils. In order to do this, an alternating magnetic field is generated by means of two transmitting coils arranged at an angle to one another. A receiving coil is brought into the alternating magnetic field and the activation of the transmitting coils is changed such that the same voltage is induced in the receiving coil by each of the transmitting coils. A ratio of current values supplied to the transmitting coils provides a measure of a determination of a position and/or angle of the receiving coil with respect to the transmitting coils.
0004DE 10 2004 047 189 A1 discloses a metal detector having printed coils.
0005The object of the invention is to provide a simple and accurate detector for a metallic object. An additional object of the invention is to specify a method for determining the metallic object.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
0006The invention achieves these objects by means of a measuring apparatus having the features of claim <b>1</b> and a method having the features of claim <b>10</b>. Dependent claims provide preferred embodiments.
0007A measuring apparatus for detecting a metallic object comprises two transmitting coils for generating superimposed magnetic fields, a magnetoresistive measuring device, in particular, a measuring device having Hall sensors, in the region of the two magnetic fields for providing an output signal dependent on the magnetic field, and a control device for supplying the transmitting coils with alternating voltages in such a way that the magnitude of an AC voltage component, which is synchronous with the alternating voltages, of the output signal of the measuring device is minimized. The control device is adapted to detect the object if the ratio of the alternating voltages does not correspond to the ratio of the distances of the measuring device from the transmitting coils.
0008The measuring apparatus can perform a field-compensated and differential measurement and thereby provide an exact measurement result that is resistant to interference. In addition, magnetoresistive measuring devices can be used, which are substantially smaller than conventional coils for determining magnetic fields. This makes possible a highly compact construction of the measuring apparatus and highly integrated measuring arrangements in close physical proximity. Unlike coils, magnetoresistive sensors measure the magnetic field and not the time-based change in the magnetic flux. When generating alternating fields by means of square-wave signals, this has the advantage of allowing the influence of the object to be measured over the entire duration of the half-cycle of the square-wave excitation, instead of only over the short period of field change in the slope region. In this way, it is possible to increase measurement accuracy.
0009The alternating voltages are preferably AC voltages that are phase-shifted to one another, preferably phase-shifted by 180°, in order to change the magnitude and phase of the magnetic fields of the transmitting coils periodically. The AC voltages enable synchronous demodulation, which makes it possible to suppress interfering signals having frequencies unequal to the modulation frequency in a highly effective manner. In addition, it is possible to generate alternating magnetic fields via the AC voltages in order to induce eddy currents in non-magnetic materials such as copper, with which they can then be detected.
0010In a first variant, the measuring device can comprise a plurality of sensors spaced apart from one another for magnetic field determination, with the sensors being aligned with one another and connected to one another in such a way that output signals from the sensors add up to zero when the magnetic fields at the sensors are equal, and main field directions of the transmitting coils and preferred directions of the sensors are parallel to one another. For example, Hall sensors oriented antiparallel can be used in a series connection in order to determine a resulting magnetic field in the region of the two transmitting coils economically and precisely.
0011The sensors can have preferred directions that run parallel to one another, and the signals from the sensors can be subtracted from one another. Alternatively to this, the preferred directions of the sensors can be aligned antiparallel, and the signals from the sensors can be added to one another. A differential amplifier can be used for addition or subtraction, or the sensors can be correspondingly connected to one another.
0012In principle, any kind of sensor that determines a magnetic field is suitable. Such sensors can have small dimensions so that the measuring device can be miniaturized. A spatial resolution can thus be increased in an embodiment up to a graphically representable range.
0013The transmitting coils lie advantageously on top of each other in layers parallel to one another, thus facilitating a matrix-like arrangement of a plurality of transmitting coils for one or a plurality of measuring devices. The transmitting coils can be air coils, in particular printed circuits (“printed coils”) formed on a printed circuit board, so that manufacturing can be of low complexity and therefore inexpensive.
0014One of the sensors can be surrounded by one of the transmitting coils and another of the sensors can lie outside the transmitting coil. By choosing the specific positions of the sensors, two or more sensors can be used in order to provide a signal which is in total proportional to the resulting magnetic field, and which relates to a plurality of points in the region of the transmitting coils.
0015In a second variant, the measuring device can comprise a sensor for determining a magnetic field gradient, with main field directions of the transmitting coils running parallel to each other and a preferred direction of the sensor running perpendicular or parallel to the main field directions. High-precision sensors for magnetic field gradients are available, for example, as AMR (anisotropic magnetoresistive effect), GMR (giant magnetoresistive effect), CMR (colossal magnetoresistive effect), TMR (tunnel magnetoresistance), or planar Hall sensors. Such sensors can also be obtained inexpensively as standard components. In another embodiment, a sensor not based on the magnetoresistive effect, for example a SQUID sensor, can also be used.
0016The transmitting coils can be arranged essentially next to one another in a layer, with the preferred direction of the sensor running parallel or perpendicular to this layer. As a result, a measuring arrangement can be accommodated on a printed circuit board that is populated only on one side, which can lower a unit price of the measuring apparatus.
0017The transmitting coils can essentially be D-shaped, with the backs of the D-shapes facing one another and the sensor being arranged between the backs of the D-shapes. In this way, it is possible to achieve a very compact construction in connection with a sensor for magnetic field gradients.
0018The sensor is preferably arranged essentially in the layer of the transmitting coils, and another sensor is provided in a layer parallel to this layer, with preferred directions of the sensor and the other sensor being perpendicular to one another. As a result, the accuracy and universality of the measuring apparatus can be increased.
0019Furthermore, the invention comprises a measuring method for detecting a metallic object comprising steps of supplying two transmitting coils with alternating voltages in order to generate superimposed magnetic fields, of determining an output signal, which is dependent on the magnetic field, of a magnetoresistive measuring device in the region of the two magnetic fields, with the supply of the transmitting coils with alternating voltages taking place in such a way that the magnitude of an AC voltage component, which is synchronous with the alternating voltages, of the output signal of the measuring device is minimized, and of detecting the object if the ratio of the alternating voltages does not correspond to a ratio of the distances of the measuring device from the transmitting coils.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0020The invention is described in greater detail below with respect to the included drawings, where:
0021<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> shows a block diagram of a measuring apparatus;
0022<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> shows an arrangement of magnetoresistive measuring devices for the measuring apparatus of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>;
0023<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> shows arrangements of a plurality of transmitting coils on the measuring apparatus of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>;
0024<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> shows arrangements of magnetic field sensors and transmitting coils for the measuring apparatus of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>;
0025<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> shows arrangements of magnetic field gradient sensors and transmitting coils for the measuring device of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>; and
0026<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> shows a flow diagram for a method for detecting a metallic object using the measuring apparatus of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
0027<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> shows a block diagram of a measuring apparatus <b>100</b>. The measuring apparatus <b>100</b> is part of a metal detector <b>105</b> for detecting metallic objects made, for example, of material containing iron.
0028A clock generator <b>110</b> has two outputs at which it provides phase-shifted periodic alternating signals, preferably phase-shifted by 180°. The alternating signals can in particular comprise square-wave, triangular, or sinusoidal signals. The outputs of the clock generator are connected to a first controllable amplifier <b>115</b> and a second controllable amplifier <b>120</b>. Each of the controllable amplifiers <b>115</b>, <b>120</b> has a control input via which it receives a signal, which controls a gain of the controllable amplifier <b>115</b>, <b>120</b>. An output of the first controllable amplifier <b>115</b> is connected to a first transmitting coil <b>125</b> and an output of the second controllable amplifier <b>120</b> is connected to a second transmitting coil <b>130</b>. Remaining ends of the transmitting coils <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> are respectively electrically connected to a defined potential.
0029As indicated by the dots at the transmitting coils <b>125</b> and <b>130</b>, the transmitting coils <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> are oriented in opposite directions. When supplied with opposite voltages with respect to the defined potential, the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> establish magnetic fields having the same orientations.
0030The same effect can also be achieved by supplying rectified voltage having alternately varying amplitude with respect to the defined potential; in this case, currents having a superimposed DC component flow. In this case, the orientation of the transmitting coil in the same direction as well as in the opposite direction makes sense. In all cases, the magnetic field sensors are to be aligned with one another and connected in such a way that there is a constant signal at the output of the magnetoresistive measuring apparatus <b>135</b> in the object-free case. This signal component corresponds to the superimposed DC component of the currents. In order not to control the input amplifier <b>140</b> unnecessarily, the input amplifier can be DC-decoupled using a capacitor.
0031A magnetoresistive measuring device <b>135</b> is connected to an input amplifier <b>140</b>. The input amplifier <b>140</b> is shown with a constant gain; however, in other embodiments, a gain of the input amplifier <b>140</b> can also be controllable. As a result, for example, a spatial resolution and/or sensitivity of the measuring apparatus <b>100</b> can be capable of being influenced and controlled, for example, based on a measured value.
0032The output of the input amplifier <b>140</b> is connected to a synchronous demodulator <b>145</b>. The synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> is furthermore connected to the clock generator <b>110</b>, from which it receives a clock signal that indicates the phase angle of the signals provided at the outputs of the clock generator <b>110</b>. In a simple embodiment in which the signals provided by the clock generator <b>110</b> are symmetrical square-wave signals, one of the output signals can be used as a clock signal. The synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> essentially interconnects the measurement signal received from the input amplifier <b>140</b> alternately at its upper and lower output based on the clock signal provided by the clock generator <b>110</b>.
0033The two outputs of the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> are connected to an integrator (integrating comparator) <b>150</b>, which is shown here as an operational amplifier connected to two resistors and two capacitors. Other embodiments are also possible, for example as an active low pass filter. A digital embodiment following the synchronous demodulator is also conceivable, in which the signal at the outputs of the synchronous demodulator is converted from analog to digital at one or a plurality of instants within a half-cycle and then compared to the corresponding value from the next half-cycle. The difference is integrated and, for example, reconverted to an analog signal and used to control the amplifiers. Whereas the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> provides the measurement signal received from the input amplifier <b>140</b> at its lower output, the integrator <b>150</b> integrates this signal over time and provides the result at its output. Whereas the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> provides the measurement signal received from the input amplifier <b>140</b> at its upper output, this signal is inverted and integrated over time by the integrator <b>150</b>, and the result is provided at the output of the integrator <b>150</b>. The voltage at the output of the integrator <b>150</b> is the integral of the difference of the low pass-filtered outputs of the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b>.
0034If the superimposed magnetic field of the transmitting coils <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> is equal in magnitude and direction at the magnetoresistive measuring device <b>135</b>, then the signals provided at the outputs of the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> are on average equal over time, and a signal that approaches zero (ground) is provided at the output of the integrator <b>150</b>. However, if the influence of the magnetic field of one of the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> predominates, then the signals provided at the outputs of the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b> are on average no longer equal, and a positive or negative signal is provided at the output of the integrator <b>150</b>.
0035The signal provided by the integrator <b>150</b> is provided for further processing via a connector <b>155</b>. In addition, a microcomputer <b>175</b> is connected to the control inputs of the controllable amplifiers <b>115</b>, <b>120</b>. The microcomputer <b>175</b> compares the provided signal to a threshold value and outputs a signal at an output <b>180</b>, which indicates the metallic object. The signal can be presented to a user of the metal detector <b>105</b> optically and/or acoustically.
0036Furthermore, the microcomputer <b>175</b> can perform additional processing of the signals tapped from the control inputs of the controllable amplifiers <b>115</b>, <b>120</b>, and can control parameters of the measuring apparatus <b>100</b> based on the signals. For example, a frequency or signal shape of the alternating voltages at the outputs of the clock generator <b>110</b> can be varied, or a sensitivity of the receiving amplifier <b>140</b> can be changed. In another embodiment, more of the displayed elements of the measuring apparatus <b>100</b> are implemented by the microcomputer <b>175</b>, for example the clock generator <b>110</b>, the synchronous demodulator <b>145</b>, or the integrator <b>150</b>.
0037The same signal from the integrator <b>150</b> is also used to control the gains of the controllable amplifiers <b>115</b> and <b>120</b>, with the second controllable amplifier <b>120</b> being directly connected to the output of the integrator <b>150</b>, and the first controllable amplifier <b>115</b> being connected to the output of the integrator <b>150</b> by means of an inverter <b>160</b>. The inverter <b>160</b> causes an inversion of the signal provided to it in such a way that the gain of the first controllable amplifier <b>115</b> increases depending on the output signal of the integrator <b>150</b> to the degree that the gain of the second controllable amplifier <b>120</b> decreases, and vice versa. It is also conceivable that only the gain of one of the controllable amplifiers is controlled, while the gain of the second controllable amplifier is kept at a fixed value.
0038A metallic object <b>170</b> is depicted in the region of the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b>. The metallic object <b>170</b> is at different distances from the transmitting coils <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> and therefore has a different degree of influence on magnetic fields of the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> having equal strength. The measuring apparatus <b>100</b> is adapted to balance out this influence via an opposite change in the gains of the controllable amplifiers <b>115</b>, <b>120</b>. If only one of the two controllable amplifiers <b>115</b>, <b>120</b> is controlled and the other is fixed, then balancing out is not achieved by means of an opposite change, but rather only with a directed change.
0039<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> shows an arrangement <b>200</b> of two magnetoresistive magnetic field sensors for use with the measuring device of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. A first Hall sensor <b>210</b> and a second Hall sensor <b>220</b> have opposite preferred directions and are connected in series in such a way that they provide a signal that totals zero in a homogeneous magnetic field. The Hall sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> are aligned with their preferred directions parallel (<b>210</b>) and antiparallel (<b>220</b>) to the main field direction of the magnetic field generated in the object-free case by the transmitting coils. The signal from the Hall sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> is routed to the input amplifier <b>140</b> in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0040The Hall sensors <b>210</b> and <b>220</b> are necessarily at a certain distance from one another so that they measure magnetic fields at different locations. An output signal from the sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> thus results if the sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> are exposed in their preferred directions to magnetic fields of varying strengths. For example, this is the case if the magnetic field of one of the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is more strongly influenced by a metallic object than the magnetic field of the other transmitting coil <b>125</b>, <b>130</b>. Based on the influence on the magnetic fields by a metallic object, a non-zero synchronous AC voltage component in particular results in the output signal of the magnetoresistive measuring device. In this case, the measuring apparatus <b>100</b> changes the voltages with which the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> are supplied in the opposite direction until the magnetic fields at the Hall sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> again have the same strength in the respective preferred directions. The voltage present at the connector <b>155</b> can be evaluated as a measure of the inequality of the alternating voltages of the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b>.
0041In a second variant, instead of the Hall sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b>, which determine magnetic fields, sensors are used to determine magnetic field gradients, which are then oriented perpendicular to a magnetic field aligned in the object-free case. In another embodiment, only one such magnetic field gradient sensor is provided.
0042<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> shows arrangements of transmitting coils on the measuring apparatus <b>100</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. For the sake of clarity, pairs of transmitting coils <b>125</b>/<b>130</b> lying on top of one other are depicted as circles; magnetic field sensors or magnetic field gradient sensors are not shown. Each of the circles corresponds to one of the arrangements shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> or <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref>. One or a plurality of measuring apparatuses <b>100</b> is provided for activating the arrangements <b>310</b>, with each measuring apparatus <b>100</b> being connected to only one of the arrangements <b>310</b> during a measurement. A switchover of a plurality of arrangements <b>310</b> to one of the measuring apparatuses <b>100</b> can occur. Information about the direction, depth, or size of the metallic object to be detected can be determined through appropriate geometric distribution of a plurality of arrangements <b>310</b>.
0043It is possible to determine depth with the arrangements in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>a </i>or <b>3</b><i>b</i>. It is possible to determine direction or orientation with the arrangements in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>c </i>or <b>3</b><i>d</i>. The arrangement in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref><i>e </i>can be used for imaging.
0044<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> shows arrangements of magnetic field sensors and transmitting coils for the measuring apparatus of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. All magnetic field sensors shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> are oriented vertically in terms of the preferred direction in which they must be exposed to a magnetic field in order to generate a maximum output signal, that is, parallel to a main magnetic field that exists inside the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b>. Deviations of the preferred directions of the magnetic field sensors from the specified orientations are innocuous, as long as the deviations are sufficiently small to allow the magnetic field sensors to determine the magnetic field in the orientation used. The transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> are formed as coreless printed coils on opposite sides of a printed circuit board.
0045In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>a</i>, the Hall sensors <b>210</b> and <b>220</b> of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> are respectively arranged centered in one of the transmitting coils <b>125</b> or <b>130</b>. The alignment of the Hall sensors <b>210</b> and <b>220</b> is antiparallel and their connection is parallel, as shown in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref>.
0046In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>b</i>, the Hall sensors <b>210</b> and <b>220</b> are oriented in parallel and connected in parallel. The magnetic field generated by the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> has different orientation inside and outside the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b>. The Hall sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> are at a distance from the turns of the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> such that the magnitudes of the magnetic fields in the object-free case correspond to one another.
0047In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>c</i>, in contrast to the illustration of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>b</i>, another, second Hall sensor <b>220</b> is provided, with the two second Hall sensors <b>220</b> lying opposite one another with respect to the first Hall sensor <b>210</b>. The alignment of the Hall sensors is parallel, with the distances of the second Hall sensors <b>220</b> from the turns of the transmitting coils being chosen such that the total of the magnitudes of the magnetic fields existing at the second Hall sensors <b>220</b> in the object-free case corresponds to the magnitude of the magnetic field existing at the first Hall sensor. The Hall sensors <b>210</b>, <b>220</b> are connected in such a way that their output signals are added.
0048In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>d</i>, the principle of the arrangement of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref><i>c </i>is extended by providing an additional first Hall sensor <b>210</b> in the interior of the first transmitting coil <b>125</b>. The Hall sensors are connected in such a way that their output signals are added. All Hall sensors are aligned parallel to one another. The distances of the Hall sensors from the turns of the transmitting coil <b>125</b> are chosen such that the sum of the magnitudes of the magnetic fields existing at the first Hall sensors <b>210</b> corresponds to the sum of the magnitudes of the magnetic fields existing at the second Hall sensors <b>220</b>.
0049<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> shows arrangements of magnetic field gradient sensors and transmitting coils for the measuring device of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. In contrast to the illustrations of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref>, the sensors used are magnetic field gradient sensors <b>510</b> whose preferred directions run parallel to the surface of the illustrated printed circuit board. In another embodiment, the preferred directions of the magnetic field gradient sensors run parallel to the main field direction. Here as well, deviations of the preferred directions of the magnetic field gradient sensors from the specified orientations are innocuous, as long as the deviations are sufficiently small to allow the magnetic field gradient sensors to determine the magnetic field in the orientation used.
0050A plurality of magnetic field gradient sensors <b>510</b> is respectively connected to one another in such a way that their output signals are added. It is also conceivable that the magnetic field gradient sensors <b>510</b> are evaluated separately, for example, in succession. To do this, the outputs of the magnetic field sensors <b>510</b> must be connected to the input of the input amplifier <b>140</b> by a switch in an alternating manner.
0051In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>a</i>, the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> are formed on opposite sides of the printed circuit board. The transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> are located next to one another and essentially have a D-shape, with the backs of the D-shapes being parallel and facing one another. The preferred direction of the magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b> is at an angle of 90° to the direction of the backs of the D-shapes.
0052In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>b</i>, in contrast to the illustration in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>a</i>, the magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b> is arranged on the same side of the printed circuit board as the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b>. The backs of the D-shapes surround the place at which the magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b> is located.
0053In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>c</i>, another magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b> on the lower side of the printed circuit board is provided in addition to the illustration in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>b</i>. The preferred direction of the upper magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b> is perpendicular to the direction of the backs of the D-shapes, and the preferred direction of the lower magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b> is perpendicular to the preferred direction of the upper magnetic field gradient sensor <b>510</b>. In another embodiment, both preferred directions can also be perpendicular to the direction of the backs of the D-shapes.
0054In <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>d</i>, a respective arrangement from <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref><i>b </i>is arranged on the upper side and the lower side of the printed circuit board, with the arrangements at the printed circuit board level being rotated by 90° to one another. The preferred directions of the magnetic field gradient sensors <b>510</b> lie perpendicular to one another.
0055<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> shows a flow diagram <b>600</b> of a method for detecting a metallic object using the measuring apparatus of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>. In a first step <b>610</b>, the transmitting coils <b>125</b>, <b>130</b> are supplied with alternating voltages in order to generate oppositely oriented magnetic fields. Next, in a step <b>620</b>, an output signal, which is dependent on the magnetic field, of a magnetoresistive measuring device in the region of the two magnetic fields is determined. In a step <b>630</b>, depending on the synchronous AC voltage component of the determined signal, the supply of the transmitting coils with alternating voltages is performed in such a way that the magnitude of the synchronous AC voltage component of the output signal of the measuring device is minimized. Finally, in a step <b>640</b>, the metallic object is detected if the ratio of the alternating voltages does not correspond to a ratio of the distances of the measuring device from the transmitting coils.
Contents4
6 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2018313670A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10670672B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2018217342A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| CN110662942A | Cited by | China | Search report |
| US10151850B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10837943B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10996289B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9110122B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2021112779A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US2012049850A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9835752B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10495699B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10209385B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2013193959A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2002158626A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2003052684A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2003222637A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2006290349A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2008012558A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009066331A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010181989A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US4994742A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6720775B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
18 members in 6 offices
Priority claims14
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102010028721 | Germany | A | |
| 102010028721 | Germany | A | |
| 1020100287210 | Germany | – | |
| 102010031142 | Germany | A | |
| 102010031142 | Germany | A | |
| 1020100311421 | Germany | – | |
| 2011056023 | European Patent Office (EPO) | W | |
| 2011056023 | European Patent Office (EPO) | W | |
| 1020100287210 | – | – | – |
| 1020100311421 | – | – | – |
| DE20101028721 | – | – | – |
| DE20101031142 | – | – | – |
| PCTEP2011056023 | – | – | – |
| WO2011EP56023 | – | – | – |
Members18
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102010031142A1 | Germany | A1 | |
| DE102010031147A1 | Germany | A1 | |
| WO2011138150A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| WO2011138151A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| WO2011138150A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| WO2011138151A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| CN102859393A | China | A | |
| CN102870013A | China | A | |
| EP2567264A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP2567265A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| US2013193959A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US2013207648A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP2567264B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| RU2012152545A | Russian Federation | A | |
| CN102870013B | China | B | |
| US9110122B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| EP2567265B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| RU2583346C2 | Russian Federation | C2 |
42 transactions on the USPTO file
Abandoned after 2 non-final rejections, 2 final rejections and 1 RCE.
- Non-final rejections
- 2
- Final rejections
- 2
- RCEs
- 1
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Mail Abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office ActionAbandonedMABN2 | MABN2 | |
| Aband. for Failure to Respond to O. A.AbandonedABN2 | ABN2 | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR | MCTFR | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR | CTFR | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Mail Interview Summary - Applicant Initiated - TelephonicMEXAT | MEXAT | |
| Interview Summary - Applicant Initiated - TelephonicEXAT | EXAT | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Disposal for a RCE / CPA / R129AbandonedABN9 | ABN9 | |
| Request for Continued Examination (RCE)RCEX | RCEX | |
| Workflow - Request for RCE - BeginBRCE | BRCE | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR | MCTFR | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR | CTFR | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| New or Additional Drawing FiledC614 | C614 | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| PG-Pub Issue NotificationPG-ISSUE | PG-ISSUE | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| FITF set to NO - revise initial settingFTFI | FTFI | |
| Sent to Classification ContractorPGPC | PGPC | |
| Filing ReceiptFLRCPT.O | FLRCPT.O | |
| Notice of DO/EO Acceptance MailedM903 | M903 | |
| 371 Completion Date371COMP | 371COMP | |
| Additional Application Filing FeesADDFLFEE | ADDFLFEE | |
| A statement by one or more inventors satisfying the requirement under 35 USC 115, Oath of the ApplicOATHDECL | OATHDECL | |
| Notice of DO/EO Missing Requirements MailedM905 | M905 | |
| Request for Foreign Priority (Priority Papers May Be Included)RQPR | RQPR | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Preliminary AmendmentA.PE | A.PE | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Cleared by OIPE CSRL194 | L194 | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
2 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Information on status: application discontinuationABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTIONSTCB | STCB | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 20130207648
- Publication, DOCDB
- 2013207648
- Publication, EPODOC
- US2013207648
- Application
- 13696262
- Application, DOCDB
- 201113696262
- Application, EPODOC
- US201113696262
Titles
- English
- Detection of a Metal or a Magnetic Object
Classification
- CPC, 4
- G01R33/091
- G01V3/104
- G01V3/107
- G01R33/0029
- IPC, 1
- G01R33 09
- USPC, 1
- 324232000