Electrically isolated shielded connector system
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
The present disclosure is related to a multiport adapter for a telecommunication connector system that is designed to reduce EMI from outside sources, as well as, between adjacent ports by electrical isolation design. The reduction of EMI is done by non-conventional methods of connecting hardware shielding techniques. The shield design surrounds all the internal pairs within the plug housing to reduce the transmitted signals EM radiation during transmission and it does not make contact with the modular connector plug, horizontal cable or the plastic support adapter housing. By isolating each component in the interface system, the coupled radiated noise from each port to port shield is individually controlled.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 29 April 2025, 1.4 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
21 claims: 2 independent, 19 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 77, broad(NHIP)A connector comprising:a printed circuit board assembly;an insulated displacement contact terminal in electrical communication with the printed circuit board assembly;a modular insert in electrical communication with the printed circuit board and adapted to receive a plug;a housing enclosing the modular insert, at least a portion of the housing is metalized and is electrically isolated from the printed circuit board assembly and external components, wherein the housing is floating relative to ground.
- 14A connector panel comprising:a main body having an opening;a plurality of connectors, each of the plurality of connectors is mounted in a bezel and the bezel is mounted in the opening, the bezel is made of a non-metallic material, each of the plurality of connectors includes: a printed circuit board assembly;an insulated displacement contact terminal in electrical communication with the printed circuit board assembly;a modular insert in electrical communication with the printed circuit board and adapted to receive a plug;a housing enclosing the modular insert, at least a portion of the housing is metalized and is electrically isolated from the printed circuit board assembly and external components, wherein the housing is floating relative to ground.
Independent claims2
44 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
0001As Unshielded Twisted Pair (“UTP”) cabling continues to be an essential choice of media transmission, new and improved methods must be employed meet the requirements of the transmitting data source. UTP cable is a popular and widely used type of data transfer media. UTP cable is a very flexible, low cost media, and can be used for either voice or data communications. In fact, UTP cable is rapidly becoming the de facto standard for Local Area Networks (“LANs”), other in-building voice, and data communications applications. In an UTP, a pair of copper wires generally forms the twisted pair. For example, a pair of copper wires with diameters of 0.4-0.8 mm may be twisted together and wrapped with a plastic coating to form an UTP. The twisting of the wires increases the noise immunity and reduces the bit error rate (BER) of the data transmission to some degree. In addition, using two wires, rather than one, to carry each signal permits differential signaling to be utilized. Differential signaling is generally immune to the effects of external electrical noise.
0002The non-use of cable shielding (e.g., a foil or braided metallic covering) in fabricating UTP cable generally increases the effects of outside interference, but also results in reduced cost, size, and installation time of the cable and associated connectors. Additionally, non-use of cable shielding in UTP fabrication generally eliminates the possibility of ground loops (i.e., current flowing in the shield because of the ground voltage at each end of the cable not being the same). Ground loops may give rise to a current that induces interference within the cable, interference against that the shield was intended to protect.
0003The wide acceptance and use of UTP cable for data and voice transmission is primarily due to the large installed base, low cost and ease of new installation. Another important feature of UTP is that it is used for varied applications, such as for Ethernet, Token Ring, ATM, EIA-232, DSL, analog telephone (POTS), and other types of communication. This flexibility allows the same type of cable/system components (such as data jacks, plugs, cross-patch panels, and patch cables) to be used for an entire building, unlike shielded twisted pair media (“STP”).
0004At present, UTP cabling is being utilized for systems having increasingly higher data rates. Since demands on networks using UTP systems (e.g., 100 Mbit/s and 1000 Mbit/s transmission rates) have increased, it has become necessary to develop industry standards for higher system bandwidth performance.
0005UTP systems such as 100 Mbit/s and 1000 Mbit/s transmission rates have produced requirements and specification for cabling transmission such as TIA 568B.2-1, which is basically the standard for category 6 cabling systems. The bandwidth requirements are 1 to 250 MHz. The main parameters are Near-end crosstalk NEXT, Far-end crosstalk FEXT, Equal Level FEXT, Return Loss RL, Attenuation, as well as, crosstalk Powersum parameters PSNEXT and PSELFEXT. From these parameters one of the major contributors is NEXT. What began as the need for connecting hardware to provide near-end cross-talk (“NEXT”) loss of less than −36 dB at 16 MHz, has evolved to −54 dB at 100 MHz and −46 dB at 250 MHz for category 6 systems with future requirements up to 500 MHz. For any data transmission event, a received signal will consist of a transmission signal modified by various distortions. The distortions are added by the transmission system, along with additional unwanted signals that are inserted somewhere between transmission and reception. The unwanted signals are referred to as noise. Noise is the major limiting factor in the performance of today's communication systems. Problems that arise from noise include data errors, system malfunctions, and loss of the desired signals.
0006Generally, cross-talk noise occurs when a signal from one source is coupled to another line. Cross-talk noise could also be classified as electromagnetic interference (“EMI”). EMI occurs through the radiation of electromagnetic energy. Electromagnetic energy waves can be derived by Maxwell's wave equations. These equations are basically defined using two components: electric and magnetic fields. In unbounded free space a sinusoidal disturbance propagates as a transverse electromagnetic wave. This means that the electric field vectors are perpendicular to the magnetic field vectors that lie in a plane perpendicular to the direction of the wave. NEXT noise is the effect of near-field capacitive (electrostatic) and inductive (magnetic) coupling between source and victim electrical transmissions.
0007Typical category 5e, 6 and most likely C6 augmented connecting hardware's will incorporate signal feedback techniques called compensation reactance. The use of compensation can decrease the internal noise of NEXT and FEXT, but it can also increase the connecting hardware external noise sources called Alien near-end crosstalk ANEXT and AFEXT and the power summation of these noises.
0008ANEXT is near-end crosstalk noise that couples from one cabling media to an adjacent cabling media, measured at the near-end or transmitter. AFEXT is far-end crosstalk noise that couples from one cabling media to an adjacent cabling media, measured at the far-end or receiver. Power sum alien near-end crosstalk (PSANEXT) loss is a combination of signal coupling from multiple near-end disturbing cabling pairs into a disturbed pair of a neighboring cabling or part thereof, measured at the near-end. Power sum alien far-end crosstalk (PSAFEXT) loss is a combination of signal coupling from multiple far-end disturbing cabling pairs into a disturbed pair of a neighboring cabling or part thereof, measured at the far-end. IEEE 802.3an 10 Gigabit Ethernet 10 Gbe and the TIA TR42.7 working groups have identified ANEXT and AFEXT as one of the major noise problem that can effect proper 10 Gbe operation over UTP cabling systems with ANEXT being the worse of the two. The initial ANEXT requirement for UTP cabling system, also called Augmented Category 6 UTP is shown in table 1 below: <tables id="TABLE-US-00001" num="1"><table frame="none" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="1"><colspec colname="1" colwidth="217PT" align="center" /><thead><row><entry namest="1" nameend="1" align="center">TABLE 1</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /></row><row><entry namest="1" nameend="1" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row><row><entry>ANEXT from TIA 568B.2-A10 draft for Augmented</entry></row><row><entry>category 6 100 meters channel link cabling</entry></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="3"><colspec colname="OFFSET" colwidth="56PT" align="left" /><colspec colname="1" colwidth="28PT" align="center" /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="133PT" align="center" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /><entry>MHz</entry><entry>dB</entry></row><row><entry /><entry namest="OFFSET" nameend="2" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0" cols="3"><colspec colname="OFFSET" colwidth="56PT" align="left" /><colspec colname="1" colwidth="28PT" align="char" char="." /><colspec colname="2" colwidth="133PT" align="char" char="." /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry /><entry>10</entry><entry>−70</entry></row><row><entry /><entry>100</entry><entry>−60</entry></row><row><entry /><entry>250</entry><entry>−54</entry></row><row><entry /><entry>400</entry><entry>−51</entry></row><row><entry /><entry>500</entry><entry>−49.5</entry></row><row><entry /><entry namest="OFFSET" nameend="2" align="center" rowsep="1" /></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0009Connecting hardware systems that will run 10 Gbe data signals must be designed to meet traditional category 6, as well as, recognized additional 10 Gbe UTP cabling parameters. Due to the adjacency of connecting hardware's in a cabling system, noise sources ANEXT and AFEXT will be present.
0010One approach to control ANEXT is the usage of a fully shielded cabling system also called Foiled Twisted pair or Screened Twisted pair ScTP. Typical FTP cabling system incorporates metallic shields that are electrically mated to ground either by the transmitting source and/or by the equipment rack ground system. The connector shields are electrically connected together, either externally by mated shield contact or internally by the PCB connection. FTP systems are an effective media for reduction of ANEXT and AFEXT noise sources. Other methods for reducing ANEXT and AFEXT involved mitigation techniques, such as, increasing connector spacing arrangement. Utilizing FTP or mitigation cabling methods provide various issues and increase complexities. In addition, FTP systems are considerably more expensive in material and installation cost. As previously discussed, another issue with FTP is proper installation of system grounds. Poor system grounding can create unwanted ground loops that could lead to increased system noise internally to the transmitter. Mitigation of connectors in many cases is not an option since standard wall outlets (i.e. single gang electrical boxes) and 1 rack unit (typ. 1.5 inch) high mount panels are spaced limited from prior standards.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
0011Exemplary embodiments of the invention include a connector including a printed circuit board assembly and an insulated displacement contact terminal in electrical communication with the printed circuit board assembly. A modular insert is in electrical communication with the printed circuit board and adapted to receive a plug. There is also a housing enclosing the modular insert and at least a portion of the housing is metalized and is electrically isolated from at least one of the printed circuit board assembly and external components.
0012Further exemplary embodiments include a connector panel including a main body having an opening and a plurality of connectors. Each of the plurality of connectors is mounted in a bezel and the bezel is mounted in the opening. The bezel is made of a non-metallic material. Each of the plurality of connectors includes a printed circuit board assembly and an insulated displacement contact terminal in electrical communication with the printed circuit board assembly. A modular insert is in electrical communication with the printed circuit board and adapted to receive a plug. There is also a housing enclosing the modular insert and at least a portion of the housing is metalized and is electrically isolated from at least one of the printed circuit board assembly and external components.
0013Further aspects, implementations, and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the description of the drawings and the detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention as provided herein below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0014So that those having ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosed invention appertains will more readily understand how to make and use the same, reference may be made to the drawings wherein:
0015<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref> is a front perspective view of an assembled connector.
0016<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 2</figref> is an exploded perspective view of the connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0017<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 3</figref> is a rear perspective view of the connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0018<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 4</figref> is an exploded rear perspective view of the connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0019<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> is a top side view of the first circuit board used with the exemplary connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0020<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> is a bottom side view of the first circuit board used with the exemplary connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0021<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> is a pictorial 3D view of a connector arrangement with the connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 1</figref>.
0022<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref> is a pictorial view of prior art of a shielded connecting hardware that is electrically connected and grounded.
0023<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref> is an exemplary embodiment of a housing that isolates a connector from an adjacent connector.
0024<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> is another alternative embodiment of a housing that isolates a connector from an adjacent connector.
0025<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 11</figref> shows a graphical illustration of a non isolated connector arrangement PSANEXT of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref> without ground(s).
0026<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref> shows a graphical illustration of an isolated connector arrangement PSANEXT of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref>.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
0027Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1-4</figref>, a connector <b>10</b> is illustrated. Connector <b>10</b> includes a front housing <b>12</b> that has a front face <b>14</b> and a main body <b>16</b>. Front face <b>14</b> has a front opening <b>18</b> that is shaped to receive a telecommunication connector (not shown). Main body <b>16</b> has four sides (only three are shown) <b>20</b>, <b>22</b>, and <b>24</b>. Sides <b>22</b> and <b>24</b> each have side openings <b>26</b> and <b>28</b>. Side <b>20</b> has a notch <b>30</b>. A back side <b>32</b> includes a back opening <b>34</b>. Front housing <b>12</b> is made of engineering plastics, such as an ABS that is a copolymer of Acrylonitrile, Butadiene, and Styrene. ABS plastics generally possess medium strength and performance and at a reasonable cost that can be color coded to the customer's selection.
0028Connector <b>10</b> also includes a printed circuit board assembly (PCB) <b>40</b> that has a modular insert <b>42</b> that is slidably received into back opening <b>34</b>. Modular insert <b>42</b> has a plurality of channel guilds for receiving contacts of the connector. Modular insert <b>42</b> contains terminals having 8 lead frames in accordance with most standard wiring formations, such as the T568B and T568A style RJ-45 connectors. It is understood that connector <b>10</b> can be sized and configured to receive any type of RJ plug. Modular insert <b>42</b> is in electrical communication with a printed circuit board <b>44</b> and is also mounted to board <b>44</b>. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 5 and 6</figref> illustrate a top side and a bottom side of PCB <b>40</b>. An exemplary embodiment of PCB <b>40</b> is fully disclosed in U.S. Application 2002/0171505, published Nov. 21, 2002, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,533,618, issued Mar. 18, 2003, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
0029PCB <b>40</b> includes a plurality of pins <b>46</b> that extend from a rear face <b>48</b> of board <b>44</b>. Pins <b>46</b> are in electrical communication with an insulation displacement contact (IDC) terminal <b>50</b>. IDC terminal <b>50</b> includes a plurality of slots <b>52</b> that extend outwardly and receives plurality of pins <b>46</b>. IDC terminal <b>50</b> is made from a polycarbonate or other like material.
0030Referring to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 5-6</figref>, PCB <b>40</b> is illustrated in more detail. <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 5</figref> illustrates a top side view of the PCB <b>40</b> and <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 6</figref> illustrates a bottom side view of the PCB <b>40</b>. PCB <b>40</b> a typical 4.1 er, dielectric constant, that is placed inside such the main body <b>16</b>. The PCB <b>40</b> is shown with its compensation reactive circuitry, as explained in U.S. Pat. No. 6,533,618, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The compensation reactive circuitry's <b>41</b><i>a</i>-<b>41</b><i>h </i>can create and radiate unwanted signals to external and nearby conductive sources, due to their potential antennas like qualities. The other radiated sources are from the signal paths, pair one <b>43</b><i>e</i>-<i>f</i>, pair two <b>43</b><i>a</i>-<i>b</i>, pair three <b>43</b><i>c</i>-<i>b </i>and signal pair four <b>43</b><i>g</i>-<i>h. </i>
0031Referring again to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 1-4</figref>, connector <b>10</b> also includes a rear housing <b>60</b> that encloses PCB assembly <b>40</b> and IDC terminal <b>50</b> and mates with front housing <b>12</b>. Rear housing <b>60</b> is metalized, which means that rear housing <b>60</b> is either diecast or formed of metal. In addition, rear housing <b>60</b> can be formed of plastic, such as an ABS polymer, and the plastic is plated with metal, such as having a copper under flash and a nickel coating. All sides, including the rear side of the rear housing <b>60</b> is metalized. Rear housing <b>60</b> includes a slot <b>62</b> that receives notch <b>30</b> of front housing <b>12</b>. Rear housing <b>60</b> also includes notches <b>64</b> and <b>66</b> located on sides <b>68</b> and <b>70</b>. Notches <b>64</b> and <b>66</b> are received by side openings <b>26</b> and <b>28</b> of front housing <b>12</b>. Notches <b>30</b>, <b>64</b>, and <b>66</b> secure front housing <b>12</b> and rear housing <b>60</b> together. Rear housing <b>60</b> also includes a back side <b>74</b> that has openings <b>76</b> and <b>78</b>.
0032Connector <b>10</b> includes at least one stuffer cap <b>80</b> and in an exemplary embodiment has two stuffer caps, as shown in the figures. Stuffer caps <b>80</b> are received into openings <b>76</b> and <b>80</b> of rear housing <b>60</b> and receive the extended slots <b>52</b> from IDC terminal <b>50</b> so as to prevent the wires (not shown) from pulling out of connector <b>10</b>. Stuffer caps <b>80</b> are formed of an insulating material, such as plastic, and may be selectively metalized so as not to ground out connector <b>10</b>. Alternatively, if stuffer cap <b>80</b> is not selectively metalized, each stuffer cap <b>80</b> is covered with a stuffer cap shroud <b>82</b>, which is metalized. This means that shroud <b>82</b> is formed of metal or is formed of plastic and then plated with metal. All four sides and the rear of the stuffer cap shroud is metalized. In addition, stuffer caps <b>80</b> may be selectively metalized and metalized shrouds <b>82</b> may also be utilized.
0033Connector <b>10</b> operates as follows. A plug (not shown), which is attached to a cable (not shown), is inserted into front opening <b>18</b> of front housing <b>12</b>. The contacts of the plug mate with the contacts of modular insert <b>42</b>. The signal from the cable is transmitted through the plug and modular inserts <b>42</b> into PCB assembly <b>40</b>. The signal is transferred from the PCB assembly <b>40</b> to IDC terminal <b>50</b>, which is connected to a second cable, thus completing the data interface and transfer through the connector <b>10</b>. By metalizing rear housing <b>60</b> and stuffer cap shrouds <b>82</b>, and selectively metalizing stuffer caps <b>80</b>, connector <b>10</b> becomes insulated from adjacent connectors and alien cross talk is reduced from connector to connector. In addition, it is understood that the metalized housing is not meant to be a conductive path from the shield in an FTP cable; instead, the metalized housing, which includes the rear housing <b>60</b>, stuffer cap shroud <b>82</b>, and the selectively metalizing stuffer cap <b>80</b> functions as a floating shield and does not conduct electricity.
0034<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 7</figref> illustrates connector <b>10</b> mounted in a connector panel <b>90</b>, which is mountable to an equipment rack (not shown). Connector panel <b>90</b> receives a plurality of connectors <b>10</b>, which are received into a bezel <b>94</b> for mounting in connector panel <b>90</b>. Bezels <b>94</b> made of a non-metallic material and provide isolation from connector to connector in panel <b>90</b>. The connector <b>10</b> is snapped into bezel <b>94</b>, which is then assembled into an opening <b>96</b> in connector panel <b>90</b>. Connectors <b>10</b>/bezels <b>94</b> can be single or multi-gang piece assemblies. Each connector <b>10</b> mounts to a bezel <b>94</b>. Another option for providing shield isolation from connector to connector is to selectively plate the connector housing with metal in locations that are adjacent to nearby connectors and in which there is no direct contact between connectors.
0035<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIGS. 9 and 10</figref> illustrate a device <b>100</b> having a metal housing <b>102</b> and plurality of connectors <b>10</b> assembled in housing <b>102</b>. It is understood that an exemplary embodiment of housing <b>102</b> includes connector panel <b>94</b> and that housing <b>102</b> also includes any other type of housing for connectors. Device <b>100</b> illustrates the electrical isolation that occurs between each connector <b>10</b>. These figures can be compared to <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 8</figref>, which illustrates the prior art connectors in which each connector is not electrically isolated from the adjacent connector. Graphically, the benefits of the isolated connector of <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref> are illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 12</figref>, as compared to a connector with no isolation, which is illustrated in <figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 11</figref>. The limit line equation is from the 568B.2-A10 draft for augmented category 6 and is a proposed requirement for 10 Gbe transmission over UTP cabling systems. As illustrated, the isolated connector stays within the defined specifications.
0036<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 9</figref> illustrates the metallic housing <b>102</b> electrically isolated from other metallic housing by non-metallic materials, such as ABS materials, to better control ANEXT and AFEXT of a connecting hardware. In an exemplary embodiment, the non-connected shield (isolated) is composed of a dielectric support member having a metallic and electrically conductive material. The shielding material typically will provide greater than 60 dB of shielding effectiveness from 1 to 500 MHz. Each isolated shield connector member generally includes a contact portion, which is exposed in the receiving space of the modular housing for making electrical contact with the media plug contacts, and a rear portion with Insulation Displacement Contacts IDC for mating with UTP wires, thus completing the input to output media connecting. The isolated shield connectors are in a positional relationship with respect to each other that substantially reduces and/or removes electrical noise. It is also understood that the isolated shield of connector is electrically isolated from the internal circuitry PCB, IDC and modular plug. Another embodiment of the device <b>100</b>, but not shown, is multiple metallic housing that are isolated and placed onto a printed circuit board. The metallic housings are, but not limited to, held in place by a non-metallic structure. Each individual housing is isolated but designed as one multi-port device that allow for reduced production piece cost and end-user installation.
0037<figref idref="DRAWINGS">FIG. 10</figref> illustrates another embodiment of device <b>100</b> in which the connectors <b>10</b> are partially isolated and illustrates an RF choke <b>104</b>. In this embodiment, connector to connector isolation can is achieved by implementing high frequency impedance device EMI chokes or ferrite beads. The usage of a high frequency impedance device, such as a ferrite core, will appear as an electrical short at low frequencies and as high impedance at high frequencies. The high frequency impedance device should have suppression materials that will increase in impedance starting at 20 MHz up to 500 MHz. Typical materials, but not limited to, are ferrite core Nickel Zinc NiZn number 43, 44 and 61 such as manufactured by the Fair-Rite Corporation. By adding a high frequency impedance device, this allows partial isolation since it essentially blocks out high frequencies, and thus reduces the sheild to shield radiated coupling from the connectors therefore decreasing ANEXT. The usage of a high frequency impedance device and the positional relationship of this device, provide essentially high frequency isolation and allow grounding of low frequency responses.
0038In addition, an isolated connector system, being of twisted pair cable, patch cord and connecting hardware with individual metallic housing for data/voice systems is provided that will not deform the wire pairs in a standard EIA T568B style wire configuration and is simple, low cost and easy to implement cabling system. Preferred installation of the isolated connector system is the same as standard UTP installations.
0039Devices and/or systems according to the present disclosure include a non-connected shield (isolated) connecting hardware system for data signal transmissions by interfacing with a media plug.
0040The invention takes a hybrid approach of solving a problem for 10 Gbe UTP cabling system. The hybrid method involves properly utilizing two media concepts to produce one unit, UTP with isolated shielded interfacing. Cabling systems are typically composed of network HUB {*patch cords→Cross-connect connection→up to 90 m horizontal cable→Telecommunication Outlet (“TO”)→patch cord→} Computer, {*} as defined by the TIA/EIA 568.B.2-1 Commercial Building Telecommunication Cabling Standard. Cross-connects and occasionally TO for shielded systems are typically horizontally or vertically multi-gang connectors placed in a single metalized holding unit. The holding units are metalized to provide electrically grounded connections to all connectors that are placed inside. The invention involves modification of connection points, the Cross-connect and TO within the cabling system.
0041Each connector <b>10</b> is internally separated by a metallic enclosure system that is also electrically isolated from each other. The metallic cavity design surrounds all the internal pairs within the plug housing to reduce the transmitted signals EM radiation during transmission and it does not make contact with the modular connector plug, horizontal cable or the plastic support adapter housing. By isolating each component in the interface system the radiated noise from each port is individually controlled by coupling reduction. The initial benefit is the reduction of the internal signal EMI field because of the metallic shields SE value. The SE being the Shielding Effectiveness of the metallic material provides an effective barrier against internal, as well as, external noise sources. The isolated cavity reduces the mutually inductive noises that have been radiated or coupled onto the shield to those coupled onto an adjacent shield. The metallic enclosure provides a shielded barrier against adjacent ports transmitting signal noises.
0042Another aspect of the present disclosure is achieving high frequency connector to connector isolation in a UTP cabling system. To achieve high frequency isolation between connectors the usage of high frequency impedance device, Ferrite beads or RF chokes, are electrically connected between each housing of a connector. Ferrite beads are comprised of several material types and frequency characteristics that provide a broad range of impedance values for noise suppression applications. For the 10 Gbe UTP cabling limits 1 to 500 MHz is the bandwidth requirement. As the frequencies increase into the upper bandwidth ranges >200 MHz radiated noises coupled onto the surrounding shields and if that shield in electrically mated to an adjacent shield, then its noise its induced into the adjacent connector. The usage of Ferrite bead for electrically mating of shields also provide external as well as, internal EMI shielding benefits. Since each connector is connected electrically by a high frequency impedance device, the external noise that is coupled into one connector in not internally coupled into adjacent connectors. By reducing high frequency shield coupling, connector ANEXT will be significantly reduced for improved operation of UTP 10 Gbe data signal in a UTP cabling system.
0043The benefit of reducing the connector transmitted signal EM noise is reduction in Port to Port Near-end crosstalk or also called Alien Near-end crosstalk (ANEXT), that can be a problem in high speed networks such as 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GBASE-T). Isolation can also be achieved by the addition of high frequency impedance device EMI Inductive source between ports to provide a common ground reference.
0044While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Contents4
9 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2010221932A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8016608B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9991638B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7914324B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010184331A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010221954A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| EP3284147A4 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| US9627828B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10424884B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2011011096A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
| US2011014802A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010216331A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2011086538A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9484692B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| CN106058519A | Cited by | China | Search report |
| US7922523B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9331431B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10424886B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2017141523A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7909619B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8333607B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2015222063A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010227497A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7878841B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7878824B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| WO2010083364A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US2017141523A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US7874865B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9614335B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009124136A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| WO2016168260A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US9620894B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2016056572A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7909643B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9583902B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9525242B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US8979588B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10424885B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8632362B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2012184154A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7857663B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010221931A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7909622B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2009318033A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2010221951A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10707630B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010221955A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7850481B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2009012495A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US7563125B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010221950A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2005151208A1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5503572A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6116943A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6302741B1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6319048B1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6394844B1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6524131B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6533618B1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6608764B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6729901B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6802743B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6840816B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6848943B2 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
2 priority claims, no other members on record
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11911605 | United States of America | A | |
| US20050119116 | – | – | – |
31 transactions on the USPTO file
Abandoned after 1 non-final rejection and 1 final rejection.
- Non-final rejections
- 1
- Final rejections
- 1
- RCEs
- 0
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Mail Abandonment for Failure to Respond to Office ActionAbandonedMABN2 | MABN2 | |
| Aband. for Failure to Respond to O. A.AbandonedABN2 | ABN2 | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejectionMCTFR | MCTFR | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejectionCTFR | CTFR | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| Date Forwarded to ExaminerFWDX | FWDX | |
| Substitute Specification FiledC604 | C604 | |
| Response after Non-Final ActionA... | A... | |
| Request for Extension of Time - GrantedXT/G | XT/G | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionMCTNF | MCTNF | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejectionCTNF | CTNF | |
| Information Disclosure Statement consideredIDSC | IDSC | |
| Reference capture on IDSRCAP | RCAP | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledM844 | M844 | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) FiledWIDS | WIDS | |
| New or Additional Drawing FiledC614 | C614 | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center CompleteTSSCOMP | TSSCOMP | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAUDOCK | DOCK | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPEOIPE | OIPE | |
| Application Is Now CompleteCOMP | COMP | |
| Additional Application Filing FeesADDFLFEE | ADDFLFEE | |
| A statement by one or more inventors satisfying the requirement under 35 USC 115, Oath of the ApplicOATHDECL | OATHDECL | |
| Notice Mailed--Application Incomplete--Filing Date AssignedINCD | INCD | |
| Cleared by L&R (LARS)L128 | L128 | |
| Referred to Level 2 (LARS) by OIPE CSRL198 | L198 | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security ReviewSCAN | SCAN | |
| Initial Exam Team nnIEXX | IEXX |
2 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Information on status: application discontinuationABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTIONSTCB | STCB | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication
- 20060246784
- Publication, DOCDB
- 2006246784
- Publication, EPODOC
- US2006246784
- Application
- 11119116
- Application, DOCDB
- 11911605
- Application, EPODOC
- US20050119116
Titles
- English
- Electrically isolated shielded connector system
Classification
- CPC, 13
- H01R13/518
- H01R4/2433
- H01R13/506
- H01R13/5213
- H01R13/6658
- H01R13/748
- H05K1/0228
- H01R13/6461
- H01R13/6586
- H01R13/659
- H01R13/6599
- H01R13/7193
- H01R24/64
- IPC, 1
- H01R24 00
- USPC, 1
- 439676000