Computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
A computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system and a method for providing an overall rack level fault indicator of a fault incurred by a unit of electronic equipment housed in the rack. The rack may be an EIA standard rack holding constituent components complying with EIA standards.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 2 May 2022, 4.4 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
28 claims: 3 independent, 25 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 75, broad(NHIP)An alert system comprising:a housing;at least one unit of electronic equipment disposed in said housing;an alert indicator disposed on said unit of electronic equipment for indicating said unit of electronic equipment has incurred a fault;and a housing alert indicator disposed on an exterior surface of said housing for indicating an overall housing level alert in response to said alert indicator indicating a fault.
- 19A method for providing an overall housing alert of a fault in at least one unit of electronic equipment by an alert system, said method comprising:indicating a fault incurred by said at least one unit of electronic equipment disposed in a housing by generating an alert signal by an alert indicator;detecting said alert signal;and indicating, at a housing alert indicator disposed on an exterior surface of said housing, an overall housing level alert in response to said alert indicator indicating a fault.
- 27An alert system comprising:means for housing at least one unit of electronic equipment;means for indicating said unit of electronic equipment has incurred a fault, disposed on said unit of electronic equipment;means for receiving a signal disposed on a surface of said means for housing in opposing spaced apart relation to said means for indicating;and means for indicating an overall housing level alert, in response to an indication of a fault by said means for indicating, disposed on an exterior surface of said means for housing.
Independent claims3
30 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] 1. Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to a fault indication system. More particularly, the present invention relates to a computer-server rack enclosure fault diagnostic system for providing an overall rack level fault indication.
[0003] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0004] Rack mount servers provide an effective way of aggregating a large number of servers, and thus storage capacity, in a relatively small space. Rack mounted servers are typically mounted in vertical racks that comply with Electronic Industry Association (EIA) specifications. EIA standard rack mount equipment is housed in a chassis or housing <b>19</b>″ wide. EIA compliant server and other electronic equipment can be readily mounted into the EIA standard rack.
[0005] In an effort to monitor, test, and maintain rack mounted electronic equipment, numerous systems and methods have been proposed for indicating, and/or detecting fault occurrences experienced by the electronic equipment mounted in the rack. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,394,459 to Djuphammar et al. discloses a plurality of telecommunication cabinets stacked in columns or rows in a station rack. Djuphammar et al discloses each cabinet as being equipped with an error LED that is lit when any circuit board assembly of unit in the cabinet indicates an error is present. U.S. Pat. No. 5,754,112 to Novack discloses a plurality of memory storage units plugged into SCA-connector bays in a console rack, wherein the SCA-connector bays are mounted on the system backplane within the console rack. For each bay-mounted SCA-connector, there is disclosed a logic circuit that includes the system backplane. The logic circuit includes a resistor and two parallel-coupled LEDs. One of the LEDs is located on the console bay adjacent a bay opening, and the second LED is mounted on a visible (i.e., outer) surface of the console rack. Both the Djuphammar et al. and the Novack disclosed systems provide a component level indication of the status of the individual electronic equipment units.
[0006] Modern high density servers, often designed to run mission critical applications, require sufficient ventilation and cooling to ensure that the server maintains a high level of availability. High density rack mounted servers should also be secure from unintended and unauthorized access. To address both of these concerns, an EIA standard rack server may typically have a finely perforated, lockable metal door that provides both a sufficient amount of ventilation and security. However, while the perforations provide the requisite security and ventilation (given, for example, a rack mounted fan), the finely sized and spaced perforations (i.e., holes) inhibit visual inspection and determination of a fault occurrence of any of the electronic equipment in the rack.
[0007] Accordingly, the Djuphammar et al. and Novack systems discussed above for example, with their individual constituent unit fault indicators, cannot provide a visual fault indication when housed in a modern server rack having a perforated door that substantially obscures direct viewing of the electrical equipment housed in the rack. Furthermore, each of the examples discussed above requires a common backplane, complex cabling, and/or specialized circuitry for each unit in the rack to provide an indication of the monitored electronic equipment unit.
[0008] Therefore, there exists a need to provide a computer-server rack enclosure fault diagnostic system for providing a visual, overall rack level fault indication for enabling a quick and precise determination of whether a rack is housing electronic equipment exhibiting a fault.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The inventors of the present invention have realized a rack alert system and a method for providing an overall rack fault indication by the rack alert system, the rack alert system having a rack enclosure having a door attached thereto, a unit of electronic equipment housed in the rack enclosure, a fault indicator located on the unit of electronic equipment for indicating the unit of electronic equipment has incurred a fault, a transceiver located on or in an interior surface of the door, the transceiver in opposing spaced apart relation to the fault indicator when the door is closed; and a rack fault indicator, located in or on an exterior surface of the rack enclosure, for indicating an overall rack level fault in response to the transceiver detecting a signal indicative of a fault generated by the fault indicator.
[0010] The above and other objects, advantages, and benefits of the present invention will be understood by reference to following detailed description and appended sheets of drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011]FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system in accordance with the present invention;
[0012]FIG. 2 is front view of an exemplary rack mount server suitable for use in the system of FIG. 1; and
[0013]FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system of FIG. 1, wherein the door thereof is in a closed position.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0014] Referring to the drawings and in particular FIG. 1, there is provided a computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system in accordance the present invention, generally represented by reference numeral <b>5</b>. Rack enclosure fault diagnostic system <b>5</b> (also referred to herein as rack alert system) includes a rack enclosure <b>10</b> having a door <b>15</b> attached thereto. Rack enclosure <b>10</b> preferably complies with EIA standards regarding its width, depth, and other physical and mechanical characteristics.
[0015] It should be appreciated that rack enclosure <b>10</b> is not limited to being an EIA compliant rack, and other standard and non-standard racks, housings, and enclosures may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention. That is, the teachings of the present invention may be extended to include non-EIA compliant racks and housings.
[0016] Exemplary rack alert system <b>5</b> has a plurality of rack mounted electronic equipment mounted in rack enclosure <b>10</b>. As depicted in FIG. 1, rack enclosure <b>10</b> houses a switch <b>20</b> for connecting separate network segments, a hub <b>25</b>, an expansion unit <b>30</b>, a RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) controller <b>32</b>, a plurality of servers <b>35</b>, a UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) <b>40</b> for maintaining a continuous supply of power to the electronic equipment in rack enclosure <b>10</b> in the event of a loss of incoming (i.e., line) power, and a PDU (Power Distribution Unit) <b>45</b> for control and distribution of power to connected servers <b>35</b> and other inter-connected equipment (e.g., <b>20</b>, <b>25</b>, <b>30</b>, <b>32</b>, and <b>40</b>) in rack enclosure <b>10</b>.
[0017] Door <b>15</b> is preferably attached to rack enclosure <b>10</b> by hinges so that door <b>15</b> may be opened to gain access to the electronic equipment housed in rack enclosure <b>10</b>. Other means of attaching door <b>15</b> to rack enclosure <b>10</b> may be used. As mentioned above, door <b>15</b> provides a level of security to the equipment housed in rack enclosure <b>10</b>. Door <b>15</b> may optionally be equipped with a locking mechanism. However, for various purposes such as maintenance and testing for example, door <b>15</b> can be opened or removed from rack enclosure <b>10</b> for accessing the electronic equipment housed therein.
[0018] Given modern high density rack mount servers and the heat generated by them, it is operationally important and crucial to adequately cool the electronic equipment mounted in the rack. Accordingly, door <b>15</b> is provided with finely sized and spaced perforations (not shown) therein to facilitate ventilating rack enclosure <b>10</b>, while not compromising the security aspects afforded by the door. Ventilation of rack enclosure <b>10</b> electronic equipment may be aided by a fan(s) that moves air across the electronic equipment in a front to back, top to bottom, or a combination thereof, air flow pattern through rack enclosure <b>10</b>.
[0019] While providing sufficient openings for ventilation of rack enclosure <b>10</b>, the finely spaced and sized perforations do not provide a clear line of sight to the electronic equipment housed therein. Thus, a front panel visual indicator located on the rack mount electronic equipment is not visible when door <b>15</b> is in a closed position.
[0020] In an aspect of the present invention, the electronic equipment depicted in FIG. 1, including exemplary servers <b>35</b>, has at least one indicator such as a light source (e.g., an LED) on the front panel thereof. The light source(s) on the front panel of server <b>35</b> preferably include an alert indicator LED <b>39</b>. Alert indicator LED <b>39</b> is illuminated when server <b>35</b> experiences a fault, error, alert or predetermined status in the operation of server <b>35</b>. The fault, error, alert or predetermined status may be any parameter related to the operation (i.e., health) of server <b>35</b>, including, but not limited to, parameters monitored by a diagnostic function of server <b>35</b>.
[0021] It is noted that rack mount electronic equipment, including rack mount servers can include a front panel LED fault/error/alert/status indicator. Further, the electronic equipment manufactured by various manufacturers and covering numerous models and types of equipment, has a fault/error/alert/status indicator(s) located on the left side of the rack mount equipment as depicted in FIG. 2.
[0022] Upon the occurrence of an alert (e.g., an error, fault, or predetermined status occurrence) in server <b>35</b>, LED <b>39</b> is illuminated to provide a visual indication of the fault, error, or predetermined status occurrence. Under normal operating conditions door <b>15</b> is closed, thereby obscuring the viewing of the electronic equipment housed in rack enclosure <b>15</b>. Alert indicator <b>39</b> on the front of server <b>35</b>, for example, is therefore also obscured when door <b>15</b> is closed. Accordingly, it cannot be seen whether any of the electronic equipment in rack enclosure <b>10</b> is exhibiting an error, fault, or predetermined status occurrence (i.e., alert indicator LED <b>39</b> is illuminated) when door <b>15</b> is closed.
[0023] In an aspect of the present invention, a transceiver <b>50</b> is located on an interior surface of door <b>15</b>, opposite fault indicator LED <b>39</b>. Transceiver <b>50</b> is positioned such that it can detect the energy propagated by alert indicator LED <b>39</b>. Preferably, transceiver <b>50</b> is located in an opposing, spaced apart relation to alert indicator LED <b>39</b> when door <b>15</b> is in the closed position, such as the interior hinge-side of door <b>15</b>. Transceiver <b>50</b> is provided to detect light from LED <b>39</b>. Transceiver <b>50</b> is preferably, though not limited to, a photodiode.
[0024] Upon detecting that LED <b>39</b> is illuminated, transceiver <b>50</b> allows a signal for activating a rack fault indicator <b>55</b> to be transmitted to and activate rack fault indicator <b>55</b>. Rack fault indicator <b>55</b> is located on the exterior of rack enclosure <b>10</b> so as to be visible when door <b>15</b> is in the closed position. Rack fault indicator <b>55</b> is preferably located near the top of rack enclosure <b>10</b>. In this manner, an error, fault, or predetermined status occurrence indicated by LED <b>39</b> is visually indicated at overall rack fault indicator <b>55</b> via transceiver <b>50</b>. Accordingly, it can be readily determined if rack enclosure <b>10</b> is housing electronic equipment exhibiting a fault, error or predetermined status.
[0025] In an aspect of the present invention, transceiver <b>50</b> has a filter that filters out all light not within a particular wavelength range. That is, transceiver <b>50</b> only passes light having a wavelength within the particular wavelength range specified for the filter of transceiver <b>50</b>. In an example of the present invention, LED <b>39</b> emits an amber colored light. In order to discern whether LED <b>39</b> is illuminated, in contrast to any other possible wavelengths of light produced by ambient or other lights sources (e.g., other LEDS on the electronic equipment), transceiver <b>50</b> preferably includes a non-amber light filter. The non-amber light filter only passes light having a wavelength corresponding to amber LED <b>39</b> (i.e., filters non-amber light).
[0026] In another aspect of the present invention, a plurality or an array of transceivers (e.g., photodiodes) are adjustably spaced along the interior of door <b>15</b>. Transceivers <b>50</b> are arranged along the interior, hinge-side edge of door <b>15</b> such that photodiodes <b>15</b> are opposite LEDS <b>39</b> associated with the various individual electronic equipment units (e.g., switch <b>20</b>, hub <b>25</b>, and servers <b>35</b>). The position of the transceivers <b>50</b> is adjustable to provide flexibility regarding the configuration of electronic equipment in rack enclosure <b>10</b>. The position of transceiver(s) <b>50</b> may be adjusted by moving transceiver <b>50</b> vertically and/or horizontally. A track, a clip, a screw mount and other retaining means may be used for holding and positioning transceiver <b>50</b>.
[0027] In another aspect of the present invention, transceiver <b>50</b> is connected to a switch <b>17</b>. Upon the detection of light energy (i.e., a signal) from LED <b>39</b> by transceiver <b>50</b>, switch <b>17</b> is closed. Closing of switch <b>17</b> activates (i.e., powers) rack fault indicator <b>55</b>. Power for transceiver(s) <b>50</b> and rack fault indicator <b>55</b> is preferably supplied from the power source powering the electric equipment in rack enclosure <b>10</b>. For example, power is supplied from UPS <b>40</b>, PDU <b>45</b>, or a battery (not shown) via a cable <b>19</b>.
[0028]FIG. 3 depicts a perspective view of rack alert system <b>5</b>, wherein door <b>15</b> is in the closed position. As discussed above, fault indicator LED <b>39</b> is not visible through perforated steel door <b>15</b>. As clearly shown, rack fault indicator <b>55</b> is mounted to the exterior of rack enclosure <b>10</b> and is visible, even when door <b>15</b> is closed. Rack fault indicator <b>55</b> is preferably mounted near the top of rack enclosure <b>10</b>. Rack fault indicator <b>55</b> may be mounted on the exterior surface of door <b>15</b>, preferably near the top of rack enclosure <b>10</b>. Mounting rack fault indicator <b>55</b> near the top of rack enclosure <b>10</b> facilitates a quick visual determination of whether rack enclosure <b>10</b> is housing electronic equipment exhibiting a fault, error or predetermined status occurrence even when door <b>15</b> is closed.
[0029] It should be appreciated that the rack enclosure <b>10</b>, transceiver <b>50</b>, and light source <b>39</b> discussed above are exemplary of the computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system of the present invention and do not preclude the inclusion, exclusion, and combination of other rack enclosures, transceivers or signal detectors, and error, fault, or predetermined status occurrence indicators other than the exemplary LED light source. The present invention has been disclosed to include a computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system that provides a quick visual determination of whether rack enclosure <b>10</b> is housing electronic equipment exhibiting a fault, even when the rack's door is closed, wherein the electronic equipment need not be modified, altered, or designed to include specialized fault indicator circuitry.
[0030] It should also be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the particular computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system configuration and other aspects of the invention herein are but examples of the present invention. Thus, they do not limit the scope or variety of applications that the present invention may be suitably implemented. Thus, it should be understood that the foregoing description is only illustrative of a present implementation of the teachings herein. Various alternatives and modification may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variances that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
Contents4
4 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2008266077A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10129179B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10276214B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10890955B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9674115B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9742696B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10509421B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11211093B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11113642B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9251451B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10554582B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8130084B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| USRE47365E | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10045457B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9940976B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11726533B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10217491B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009072953A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9742704B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010211665A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US11269302B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10303376B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10660240B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10559328B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10026445B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US6747874B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2019079570A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US11423949B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10026455B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11263841B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10971194B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US9734676B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10551806B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010211697A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10431254B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10205519B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10490004B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US11500430B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10418063B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9959189B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9667566B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2004090749A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10395695B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10822838B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10700778B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10418071B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10417851B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2015347259A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2009282140A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10679666B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2013275661A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9905089B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010215049A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10172253B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010211664A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8421614B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11676640B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2016275772A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9713215B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2018171674A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10566023B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10769044B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US11158355B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2009023431A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5790374A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6459571B1 | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
2 members in 1 office
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12498702 | United States of America | A | |
| US20020124987 | – | – | – |
Members2
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2003197619A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US6867701B2 | United States of America | B2 |
37 transactions on the USPTO file
Allowed after 2 non-final rejections and 1 final rejection.
- Non-final rejections
- 2
- Final rejections
- 1
- RCEs
- 0
- Appeals
- 0
Over time
Point at a mark for the transactionTransactions
| Event | |
|---|---|
| Expire Patent | |
| Recordation of Patent Grant Mailed | |
| Patent Issue Date Used in PTA CalculationAllowed | |
| Issue Notification MailedAllowed | |
| Receipt into Pubs | |
| Dispatch to FDC | |
| Application Is Considered Ready for Issue | |
| Receipt into Pubs | |
| Issue Fee Payment Verified | |
| Issue Fee Payment Received | |
| Workflow - File Sent to Contractor | |
| Mail Notice of AllowanceAllowed | |
| Notice of Allowance Data Verification CompletedAllowed | |
| IFW TSS Processing by Tech Center Complete | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Response after Final Action | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Mail Final Rejection (PTOL - 326)Final rejection | |
| Final RejectionFinal rejection | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| Response after Non-Final Action | |
| Workflow incoming amendment IFW | |
| Correspondence Address Change | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection | |
| Date Forwarded to Examiner | |
| New or Additional Drawing Filed | |
| Response after Non-Final Action | |
| Mail Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection | |
| Non-Final RejectionNon-final rejection | |
| Case Docketed to Examiner in GAU | |
| Application Dispatched from OIPE | |
| Application Is Now Complete | |
| IFW Scan & PACR Auto Security Review | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | |
| Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed | |
| Initial Exam Team nn |
5 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance feeLapsedFP | FP | |
| Information on status: patent discontinuationPATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362STCH | STCH | |
| Lapse for failure to pay maintenance feesLapsedLAPS | LAPS | |
| Maintenance fee reminder mailedREMI | REMI | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication, DOCDB
- 2003197619
- Publication, EPODOC
- US2003197619
- Application
- 10124987
- Application, DOCDB
- 12498702
- Application, EPODOC
- US20020124987
Titles
- English
- Computer-server rack enclosure fault light diagnostic system
Patent term adjustment
- A delay
- +17 daysthe office missed an examination deadline
- Applicant delay
- −3 days
- Net adjustment
- 14 days
Classification
- CPC, 2
- H05K7/20836
- H05K7/1498
- IPC, 1
- H05K7 20
- USPC, 1
- 340635000