Computer system and method for the search statistical evaluation and analysis of documents
Claim Score by NHIP
Abstract
The present invention relates to a computer system for the search, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents, with a server computer with means of access to an external database over a computer network, means for querying the external database according to a standard search profile, means for starting the query at predefined time intervals and means for storing data from the external database as the result of the query for an internal database. The present invention also includes a a client computer with first program means for input of an individual search request for a search in the internal database, second program means for display of a hit list from the search, third program means for selection of data from the hit list by a user, means for loading and storing the selected data from the internal database, fourth program means for the display of stored data, fifth program means for the statistical evaluation of stored data, sixth program means for the analysis of stored data and means for selection of the display, statistical evaluation or analysis of stored data.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 4 April 2023, 3.5 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
22 claims: 3 independent, 19 dependent
- 1Broadest claimClaim Score 57, average(NHIP)A computer system for the search, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents comprising:(a) a means for accessing at least one external database through a computer network, (b) a means for querying the external database according to a standard search profile, (c) a means for performing the query at a predefined time interval, (d) a means for storing data from the query on an internal database, (e) a means for requesting an individual search of the internal database, (f) a means for displaying the results of the individual search in the form of a hit list, (g) a means for selecting data from the hit list, (h) a means for storing the selected data, (i) a means for displaying the selected data, (j) a means for statistically evaluating the selected data or analyzing the selected data, and (k) a means for displaying the evaluated or analyzed data.
- 13A method for the computer-supported search, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents comprising:(a) accessing at least one external database over a computer network, (b) querying the external database according to a standard search profile at predefined time intervals, (c) storing data from the external database as a result of the query on an internal database, (d) inputting an individual search request for a search in the internal database by a client computer, (e) displaying a hit list from the search, (f) selecting data from the hit list, (g) loading the selected data from the internal database, (g) storing the loaded data on the client computer, (h) inputting a request for the display, statistical evaluation or analysis of the stored data, and (i) displaying, statistically evaluating or analyzing the selected data.
- 22A computer program product on a computer server with a program means for carrying out a method for the computer-supported search, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents comprising:(a) accessing at least one external database over a computer network, (b) querying the external database according to a standard search profile at predefined time intervals, (c) storing data from the external database as a result of the query on an internal database, (d) inputting an individual search request for a search in the internal database by a client computer, (e) displaying a hit list from the search, (f) selecting data from the hit list, (g) loading the selected data from the internal database, (h) storing the loaded data on the client computer, (i) inputting a request for the display, statistical evaluation or analysis of the stored data, and (j) displaying, statistically evaluating or analyzing the selected data.
Independent claims3
48 paragraphs in 5 sections, as filed
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a computer system for the search, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents, such as technical documents and patent literature. The invention further relates to a corresponding method and computer program.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Various systems for document management and the analysis of technical literature and patents are known.
[0003] U.S. Pat. No. 5,991,751 discloses a system which is based on patent databases and further databases with information that is of interest for a firm. In the system, various groups are formed, each group containing a number of patents of the patent database. In response to a suitable command, the patents belonging to a group are processed in conjunction with the information of the further databases. It is also possible, for instance, to ascertain patent citations, the number of patents of an inventor, and similar information automatically.
[0004] A relational database that contains a multidimensional hierarchical model of interconnected categories is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,721,910. The database can be used to record the significant content of scientific or technical documents, such as patents or patent abstracts, and to classify the documents into a particular scientific or technical category in the multidimensional hierarchical model.
[0005] A system for the management and analysis of documents is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,561. The system is interactive and allows both word-based analysis and also a conceptual analysis as well as the display of information. A particular application area is the analysis of patent literature, such as patent claims, for example.
[0006] A system for so-called Intellectual Property Asset Management is taught in WO 00/52618. In the system, data from different databases is merged, and citations and inventors' details are evaluated.
[0007] U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,907 teaches an examination system for intellectual property, which is used for assessment of a portfolio. The system contains a database, which holds information concerning a portfolio of industrial protective rights. The system contains further databases for storing empirical data for assessment of the portfolio. This involves the determination of qualitative ratios, which are calibrated on the basis of economic values.
[0008] U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,663 discloses a system for analysis of a document, which verifies the consistent use of the terminology in a patent application.
[0009] U.S. Pat. No. 5,991,780 teaches a system for selective display of patent texts and drawings. The text and the drawings are stored in files separated from each other, and presented together in a user interface.
[0010] Further systems for processing and displaying patent documents are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,950,214, and 6,018,749 and WO 00/11575.
[0011] Methods for patent analysis are also disclosed in European patent application number 001 18 457, as well as from K K Brockhoff: “Indicators of Firm Patent Activities”, Portland, Oct. 27-31, 1991, New York, IEEE, US, vol.—October 1991 (1991-10), pages 476-481, XP002923550 and V Stefanov: “Some Possibilities of a Patents Database in Determining a Firm's Policy”, World Patent Information, GB, Elsevier Sciences Publishing, Barking, Vol 17, no. 3, Sep. 1, 1995 (1995-09-01), pages 201-204, XP004037786, ISSN: 0172-2190.
[0012] An object of the present invention is to create an improved computer system for the search, statistical evaluation and analysis of documents, especially of technical documents and patent literature, as well as a corresponding method and computer program product.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0013] The present invention allows an integrated corporate system to be created for access to technical and patent information, and for evaluation and analysis of the information, especially for the purpose of competition monitoring and intellectual property management. The invention allows selective acquisition of documents, for example by means of a profile search in patent databases, the search being performed at regular intervals, such as daily, weekly or monthly. The relevant documents are then saved and distributed within the company. It is also possible to search in the company's internal database and to load the investigated documents.
[0014] The present invention also includes the statistical evaluation of the documents found, according to predefined categories, such as automatic generation of bar charts to represent the distribution of patents to competitors or technology fields, or other categories.
[0015] The present invention further allows analysis of documents in the company's internal database by means of patent analysis functions which are known per se.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016]FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer system according to the present invention.
[0017]FIG. 2 is a graphic user interface for the statistical evaluation of the documents according to the present invention.
[0018]FIG. 3 is a flowchart to represent database server and server client processes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0019] According to the present invention, control elements are displayed in a graphic user interface, each of the control elements corresponding to a certain category, for which a statistical evaluation can be performed. Examples of control element categories offered to the user include “Author”, “Applicant”, “Year of Publication” or “International Patent Class (I PC)”. When the user selects one of these control elements, e.g. by clicking on it with the mouse, a corresponding statistical analysis of the documents is automatically performed. The result of the analysis is preferably output in the form of a bar chart or as a 2D matrix.
[0020] The user preferably begins this process by performing a search in the internal company database for patent documents of interest to him. The user receives a hit list of documents as the result. From this hit list, the user typically selects all documents or a subset, for further evaluation. For the subsequent evaluation of the selected documents from the hit list, the graphic user interface with the control elements offers a convenient platform, which the user can use intuitively without a long period of familiarization.
[0021] According to the present invention, the user has the possibility of analysis of the selected documents in the hit list in addition to the statistical evaluation. For this, quality coefficients are automatically calculated as is disclosed in European patent application EP 1 182 578 A1. The quality coefficients can be, for example, patent quality ratios.
[0022] According to the present invention, the external database contains the abstracts and bibliographical information of patents. This database is searched within predefined time intervals, daily for instance, with a defined standard search profile.
[0023] The newly acquired documents are then loaded on the company's internal server computers and saved in an internal database. However, further data such as legal status information and citations is needed for calculating quality coefficients for patent analysis. This data is retrieved from an external data source as necessary, if a user wishes for an analysis of this nature. Preferably, the query for supplementary data can occur automatically. A further advantage is that data, such as, legal status information and citations that is only of interest in special cases is not loaded in advance for all patents, so that there can be a saving in memory space and database costs. However, if data that is no longer changing is found among the data that is only of interest in special cases, it is stored in the internal databases. This applies especially to legal statuses.
[0024] According to the present invention, the result of the analysis is graphically formatted and output in an intuitive form. A preferred form of output is known per se and is disclosed in European patent application EP 1 182 578 A1.
[0025] The computer system of according to the present invention has an external database <b>1</b>, which for example is a database for storing technical and/or patent literature. For each document entered in the database <b>1</b>, there is a data record, which contains an abstract and bibliographical information for the relevant document.
[0026] In addition, it is also possible to access further external databases, for example database <b>2</b> and database <b>3</b>, which contain supplementary information, needed for calculating documents' quality coefficients, for the documents of the database <b>1</b>. In the case of patent literature, this further information can be legal status information and/or citations, for example.
[0027] The databases <b>1</b>, <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> can e.g. be accessed over the Internet <b>4</b> or Datex P from the server computer <b>5</b> of an organization <b>6</b>. A standard search profile <b>7</b> is stored in the server computer <b>5</b>. The standard search profile <b>7</b> is automatically started at certain time intervals, for example once daily or at other regular or irregular intervals. A search request is defined in the standard search profile <b>7</b>, covering topic areas relevant for the organization <b>6</b>.
[0028] The data records found as a result of the standard search profile <b>7</b> are stored in an internal database <b>8</b> on the server computer <b>5</b>. A keyword list <b>37</b> is also stored on the server computer <b>5</b>.
[0029] The keyword list <b>37</b> contains a predefined set of keywords, which can be used for indexing documents. The keywords in the keyword list <b>37</b> are chosen here according to the fields of interest of the organization. One or more synonymous terms can be assigned to each of these preset keywords, as can translations into other languages. This means that documents using different terminology or documents in a foreign language can also be indexed.
[0030] From a client computer <b>9</b>, the server computer <b>5</b> and its internal database <b>8</b> can be accessed via an intranet <b>10</b>. Typically, several employees of the firm <b>6</b> have such a client computer <b>9</b> with the possibility of accessing the server computer <b>5</b> via the intranet <b>10</b>.
[0031] The client computer <b>9</b> contains a search program <b>11</b> with a program module <b>12</b> for an individual search request. The program module <b>12</b> can contain a customary Internet browser such as Microsoft Explorer or Netscape Navigator, for example. Via this Internet browser, the user of the client computer <b>9</b> makes contact with the server computer <b>5</b>, by entering the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) of the desired web site of the server computer <b>5</b> in the browser program. The individual search request or a stored search request can be entered in this web site.
[0032] The search program <b>11</b> further contains a program module <b>13</b> for the display of the hit list obtained for an individual search request. This display can also take place via the web browser.
[0033] The search program <b>11</b> further contains a program module <b>14</b> for the selection of data records from this hit list. The selection of data records from the hit list can also be implemented by means of the web browser. The data records selected by the user from the hit list are then automatically loaded from the server computer <b>5</b>, i.e. its internal database <b>8</b>, on to the client computer <b>9</b>, and stored in its memory <b>15</b>.
[0034] The keyword list <b>37</b> is preferably also transferred to the client computer, or its search program <b>11</b>, along with the hit list. The search program <b>11</b> has a program module <b>38</b> for indexing the data of the hit list with the help of the keyword list <b>37</b>. The keywords assigned to the individual documents of the hit list are transferred by the search program <b>11</b> via the intranet <b>10</b> to the server computer <b>5</b> and stored there in the internal database <b>8</b>.
[0035] By this means, a different user accessing the relevant documents at a later date can use the previously executed indexing again. With the keyword list <b>37</b>, it is preferred that terminology consistent throughout the organization is used for the keywords and also for search requests. Search requests are preferably constructed from the defined keywords in the keyword list <b>37</b>.
[0036] The keywords determined for a particular hit list are similarly stored together with the data of the hit list in the memory <b>15</b>.
[0037] The data records stored in the memory <b>15</b> can then be accessed for various purposes, such as for the display of data, its statistical evaluation and/or its analysis.
[0038] For this the search program <b>11</b> contains a program module <b>16</b> for the display of data records stored in memory <b>15</b>, and a program module <b>17</b> for the statistical evaluation. A program module <b>18</b> also serves for analyzing the stored documents. Quality coefficients, which need further supplementary data, are calculated for this analysis. In this case the program module <b>18</b> automatically accesses the database <b>2</b> through the server computer <b>5</b> and e.g. the Internet <b>4</b>, to retrieve the supplementary data.
[0039] Thus in the operation of the system in FIG. 1, the standard search profile <b>7</b> is processed once daily, for instance, and a corresponding search request <b>19</b> is directed to the database <b>1</b>. The system then responds with new data <b>20</b>, which has been acquired since the last query and matches the interest profile for the organization <b>6</b>, as formulated in the search request <b>19</b>.
[0040] The new data <b>20</b> is stored in the internal database <b>8</b>, and optionally indexed, e.g. by one skilled in the art, according to a scheme adapted for the organization.
[0041] An employee of the organization <b>6</b> can then use his client computer <b>9</b> to input an individually formulated search request and direct it to the internal database <b>8</b>. A hit list is then displayed for the user on his screen, and all the data or a subset of the data can be selected from this list. The selected data is then loaded from the internal database <b>8</b> into the memory <b>15</b> of the client computer <b>9</b>, so that the user can process it further. One possibility for the user is to present the loaded data graphically by means of the program module <b>16</b>, i.e. to open and display the file. A further possibility is statistical evaluation using the program module <b>17</b>, and also patent analysis using the program module <b>18</b>.
[0042]FIG. 2 shows the user interface for the program module <b>17</b>. The user interface contains the control elements <b>21</b>, <b>22</b>, <b>23</b> and <b>24</b> for the categories “Author”, “Applicant”, “Year of Publication” and “IPC”. If a user selects the control element <b>22</b>, for example, a bar chart is automatically output in the display area <b>25</b> on the screen, showing the number of documents per patent applicant in the selected set of data from the hit list. The action is similar for the other available categories. An advantage of the present invention is that the user has no need to formulate statistical evaluations himself, but simply clicks on the desired category.
[0043] The user can start the program module <b>18</b> for the statistical evaluation by selecting the control element <b>26</b>. The evaluation is then automatically performed, and likewise output in graphic form, for the data previously selected from the hit list and stored. For this the program module <b>18</b> automatically accesses the external database <b>2</b> if necessary, to retrieve supplementary information from it.
[0044]FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of the corresponding processes. The process <b>27</b> here relates to the process in which the database <b>1</b> and the server computer <b>5</b> are involved. This process <b>27</b> consists of the step <b>28</b>, in which the server computer processes the standard search profile and directs a corresponding search request to the database. In the step <b>29</b>, corresponding new documents are delivered to the server computer from the database, and stored in the server computer's internal database.
[0045] Process <b>30</b>, which concerns one of the client computers and the server computer, runs in parallel to and independently of this. Several such processes <b>30</b> can run in parallel for different client computers.
[0046] The user begins by entering his individual search request in step <b>31</b>. He receives a hit list for this in step <b>32</b>.
[0047] The user then has the option of selecting elements of the hit list for display in step <b>33</b> or for statistical evaluation in step <b>34</b>. The user has the further possibility of an analysis. For this it is possible in some circumstances that supplementary data is loaded in step <b>35</b>, for performing this analysis in step <b>36</b>.
[0048] Although the invention has been described in detail in the foregoing for the purpose of illustration, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention except as it may be limited by the claims.
Contents5
3 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US7536405B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7433865B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US10885078B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2008133338A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8090664B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2003160818A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7797254B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7774208B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2006080136A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10614082B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7797253B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7653554B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2010088244A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7941468B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9659071B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US9489350B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2011270606A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7441197B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7373274B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| US2005033737A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2008060210A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2006224412A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US10140673B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2006149711A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2016078109A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2007233544A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US9129252B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8805843B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2008243889A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2008201211A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7840498B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2005021286A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US8190532B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7774207B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10546273B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| DE102004026183A1 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| US7680677B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| DE102004026183B4 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| US2008154682A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2006080135A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2006085220A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US2007276796A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| DE102004029728A1 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| US9697577B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US2006085219A1 | Cited by | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US7809653B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8121852B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10860657B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US4527271A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5721910A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5950214A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5991751A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5991780A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US5999907A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6014663A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6018749A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
| US6038561A | Cites | United States of America | Pre-grant |
2 members in 2 offices
Priority claims3
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10215495 | Germany | A | |
| 102154953 | – | – | – |
| DE2002115495 | – | – | – |
Members2
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2003191780A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| DE10215495A1 | Germany | A1 |
2 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Information on status: application discontinuationABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTIONSTCB | STCB | |
| AssignmentAS | AS |
Numbers
- Publication, DOCDB
- 2003191780
- Publication, EPODOC
- US2003191780
- Application
- 10406816
- Application, DOCDB
- 40681603
- Application, EPODOC
- US20030406816
Titles
- English
- Computer system and method for the search statistical evaluation and analysis of documents
Classification
- CPC, 2
- G06F17/3061
- G06F16/30
- IPC, 1
- G06F17 30
- USPC, 3
- 001001000
- 707999107
- 707E17058