Authentication method and schemes for data integrity protection

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

[0001] This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C Section 119(e) of provisional application Ser. No. 60/193,447 entitled “XCBC Encryption Modes and XECB Authentication Modes” filed on Mar. 31, 2000, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The present invention relates to the technical field of data communication over insecure channels and data storage on insecure media. Specifically, the invention relates to authentication methods, program products and systems based on block ciphers that protect data integrity efficiently in a parallel, pipelined or sequential manner, and can process, generate and verify authentication tags incrementally and in an out-of-order fashion.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] Message authentication methods provide the ability of a message recipient communicating with a message sender via an insecure channel to determine whether the message received was, in fact, generated by the message sender. These methods are desirable because an insecure channel allows a party not intended to communicate via the insecure channel (i.e., an adversary) to alter the other parties' messages (sections deleted, rearranged, added to, etc.) and insert messages of their own into the insecure channel. Message authentication methods guarantee the integrity (authenticity) of message data such that an adversary cannot alter a message after it is generated, transmitted on, or stored in, the insecure channel in a way that remains undetected by a message recipient. Authentication methods are also desirable whenever a party stores a set of data on an insecure storage device that can be accessed by other parties which are not intended to alter those data (viz., V. D. Gligor and B. G. Lindsay: “Object Migration and Authentication,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-5 Vol. 6, November 1979).

[0004] Message authentication methods were surveyed by A. J. Menezes, P. C. van Oorschot, and S. A. Vanstone in their book “Handbook of Applied Cryptography”, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1997, incorporated by reference herein. A well-known method for performing message authentication requires that an authentication tag, also known as the Message Authentication Code (MAC), be computed for a message using a block cipher, with a secret key shared by the sender and receiver. The length of the authentication tag, or MAC, is fixed and usually much smaller than that of the message for which it is computed. Upon receipt of a message and its authentication tag, a receiver computes the authentication tag of the received message by applying the block cipher in the same manner as that used by the sender, and compares the computed tag with the received tag. If the two tags are equal, the message is accepted as authentic; otherwise, the message is rejected. The specific procedure for computing and verifying an authentication tag (or MAC) is called the authentication scheme or mode.

[0005] It is well-known in the art that aforementioned block ciphers, which have long been established among the cryptographic primitives of choice for implementing general message and data encryption, can be used to implement message authentication schemes. A block cipher uses a key to transform data (plaintext) blocks of fixed length into ciphertext blocks of the same length. Although message authentication schemes exist that use other cryptographic primitives (e.g., hash functions) and do not rely exclusively on block ciphers (viz., J. Black, S. Halevi, H. Krawczyk, T. Krovetz, and P. Rogaway, “UMAC: Fast Message Authentication via Optimized Universal Hash Functions,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '99, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1666, 216-233, 1999; and M. Bellare, R. Canetti, and H. Krawczyk, “Keying Hash Functions for Message Authentication,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '96, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1109, pp. 1-15, 1996, for some recent examples), authentication schemes that use only block ciphers are both necessary and desirable. They are necessary whenever the block cipher is the only cryptographic primitive available, as it is often the case since (1) block ciphers alone are sufficient, and routinely used, for most cryptographic operations including message encryption, and (2) supporting additional, separate cryptographic primitives (e.g., hash functions) to be used exclusively for message authentication would increase both system complexity and cost. They are desirable whenever the use of block ciphers leads to improved performance of the message authentication scheme, as it is often the case since hardware and firmware support for block-cipher implementation is significantly more widespread and less costly than that for cryptographic primitives specialized for MAC computation and verification (e.g., hardware and firmware support for hash functions).

[0006] The best-known authentication scheme based exclusively on block ciphers is the Cipher-Block Chaining Message Authentication Code (CBC-MAC). The CBC-MAC takes as input data a plaintext string x=x_i. . . x_nand a secret key K shared by the sender of message x and the intended receiver. Key K is usually chosen uniformly at random. The size of each block x, is l bits and that of key K is k bits. The authentication tag of plaintext x is provided by z_n, where z_i=F_K(x_i⊕Z_i−1), where i=1, . . . ,n, z_O=0, ⊕ is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation, and F_Kis the block cipher F using key K (viz., M. Bellare, J. Killian, P. Rogaway: “The security of cipher block chaining,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '94, LNCS 839, pp. 341-358, 1994). After receiving message x and authentication tag z_n′, the receiver computes authentication tag z_nof message x and then compares this tag with z_n′. Message x is accepted as authentic by the receiver only if the two tags are equal.

[0007] A well-known block cipher used to implement the CBC-MAC, as well as other MACs, is provided by the U.S. Data Encryption Standard (DES), which uses a key size k of 56 bits and has both the input and output block sizes l of 64 bits (viz., NBS FIPS Pub 46, titled “Data Encryption Standard,” National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, January 1977). It is well-known in the art that the CBC-MAC can use other block cipher algorithms, not just that of DES. In particular, the CBC-MAC, as well as other MACs, can be computed with block ciphers representing pseudo-random functions, not just permutations as in the case of DES, thereby allowing more blocks to be processed before changing the shared secret key (viz., M. Bellare, J. Killian, P. Rogaway: “The security of cipher block chaining,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '94, LNCS 839, pp. 341-358, 1994). Variants of the CBC-MAC have also been proposed for various applications, including the authentication of real-time data sources where (1) message length remains unknown until the entire message is received, and (2) commencing message authentication cannot be deferred until the end of the message (viz., E. Petrank and C. Rackoff: “CBC MAC for Real-Time Data Sources,” manuscript available at http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/{tilde over ()}erez/publications.html, 1999). Some variants of CBC-MAC have also been adopted as national and international standards (e.g., ANSI X9.9: “Financial Institution Authentication,” 18 pp., 1986).

[0008] It is well-known in the art that the main drawback of the CBC-MAC stems from the sequential manner of the authentication tag computation (viz., M. Bellare, R. Guerin, and P. Rogaway, “XOR-MACs: New Methods for Message Authentication Using Finite Pseudo-Random Functions,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '95, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 963, pp. 15-28; and M. Bellare, R. Guerin, and P. Rogaway, “Method and Apparatus for Data Authentication in a Communication environment,” U.S. Pat. No. 5,757,913, dated May 26, 1998). That is, the restriction of computing the authentication tag sequentially imposed by the CBC-MAC definition severely limits the speed with which the tag can be computed in computer systems and networks where multiple processing units are available for the concurrent (i.e., parallel or pipelined) block-enciphering operations needed by authentication-tag computation. Despite the availability of multiple processing units that can perform these operations concurrently (i.e., in a parallel or in a pipelined manner), the authentication tag produced by the CBC-MAC must be implemented sequentially, as if only one such unit were available. This represents a significant performance disadvantage of the CBC-MAC and of all other authentication schemes based on it.

[0009] Another disadvantage of the CBC-MAC, also well-understood in the art, is that the CBC-MAC does not allow incremental computation of a new authentication tag from an old one; e.g., if a small section of a large message or stored data, for instance one l-bit block is updated, the entire computation of the authentication tag must be performed from scratch, as would be necessary for any new message, thereby failing to take advantage of the fact that only a small message area is modified and save the block enciphering operations for unmodified blocks (viz., M. Bellare, S. Goldwasser, and O. Goldreich, “Incremental Cryptography and Applications to Virus Protection,” Proceedings of the 27^thAnnual Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC '95) ACM Press, pp. 45-56, 1995). As a result, a substantial performance loss in incurred as a consequence of any message or stored data update. A further disadvantage of the CBC-MAC, also well-known in the art, is that the CBC-MAC does not allow out-of-order processing of message blocks for the computation and verification of the authentication tag; e.g., if a block of a message arrives at the authentication tag processing unit before the blocks preceding it in the message, the processing unit must wait until all preceding blocks arrive and are processed before processing the block that arrived first. As a consequence, authentication tag processing is delayed, thereby causing slow-downs of message transmission and reception.

[0010] Another message authentication scheme well-known in the art, which relies exclusively on a block cipher, is the XOR-MAC (viz., M. Bellare, R. Guerin, and P. Rogaway, “XOR-MACs: New Methods for Message Authentication Using Finite Pseudo-Random Functions,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '95, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 963, pp. 15-28; and M. Bellare, R. Guerin, and P. Rogaway, “Method and Apparatus for Data Authentication in a Communication environment,” U.S Pat. No. 5,757,913, dated May 26, 1998.) The message to be sent is partitioned into data blocks consecutively identified by their position in the message; i.e., by identifier <b>1</b> for the first data block, identifier <b>2</b> for the second, and so on. Each data block is encoded together with its identifier to form an l-bit word, where l is the length of the block cipher input, and is submitted for enciphering. A separate ciphertext block is created that represents the enciphering of a message header, and this ciphertext block and all the other ciphertext blocks obtained from the enciphering of the message words are combined by an bitwise exclusive-or operation to create an authentication tag.

[0011] Although the XOR-MAC allows parallel, pipelined, incremental, and out-of-order processing of the authentication tag, it has the fundamental disadvantage that it requires twice as many uses of the block enciphering function as those needed by the CBC-MAC for the same length of the input plaintext string. This implies that (1) in sequential implementation, the XOR-MAC is twice as slow as the CBC-MAC, and even slower than other authentication schemes that do not rely exclusively on block ciphers, such as UMAC (viz., J. Black, S. Halevi, H. Krawczyk, T. Krovetz, and P. Rogaway, “UMAC: Fast Message Authentication via Optimized Universal Hash Functions,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '99, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1666, 216-233, 1999) and HMAC (viz., M. Bellare, R. Canetti, and H. Krawczyk, “Keying Hash Functions for Message Authentication,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '<b>96</b>, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 1109, pp. 1-15, 1996), and (2) in concurrent (i.e., parallel or pipelined) implementation the XOR-MAC is slower than other authentication schemes, such as the UMAC, that can also be implemented in a concurrent manner. As a consequence, use of the XOR-MAC would slow down message transmissions and data storage rates substantially, thereby causing inefficient transmission and storage of information.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0012] Briefly, the present invention comprises, in one embodiment, an authentication method that provides a data signing function that determines an authentication tag for use in conjunction with transfer of data using a communication channel or with data storage on storage media, comprising the steps of: partitioning the data into a plurality of data blocks; for each of the data blocks, performing a randomization function over the data block to create an input block of the same size as that of the data block, the input block not including a block identifier; applying a pseudo-random function to each the input block to create a plurality of enciphered blocks; and combining the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0013] In a further aspect of the present invention, the pseudo-random function is a standard block cipher.

[0014] In a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication method is provided that includes a data signing function that determines an authentication tag, comprising the steps of: receiving an input plaintext string comprising the data to be signed and padding it as necessary such that its length is a multiple of l bits; partitioning the padded input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; creating a random vector of l bits in length; performing a randomization function over the plurality of plaintext blocks and the random vector block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; and performing a combination operation over the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0015] In a further aspect of the present invention, the performing a randomization function step comprises combining each of the plaintext blocks and the random vector block with a different corresponding element of a sequence of unpredictable elements to create a plurality of input blocks.

[0016] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the step of generating the random vector block from a random number generated on a per-message basis.

[0017] In another aspect, the present invention further comprises the step of appending the created random vector block after a last block of the set of equal-sized blocks comprising the padded plaintext string.

[0018] In a further aspect of the present invention, the input blocks from the randomization step comprise n+1 blocks each of l-bit length, where n is the total number of blocks in the set of equal-sized blocks of the padded input plaintext string.

[0019] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the step of generating each of a plurality of the unpredictable elements of the sequence of unpredictable elements by combining a different element index i of each of the unpredictable elements and a random initial vector.

[0020] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the step of generating the random initial vector from a random number generated on a per-message basis.

[0021] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: the sequence of the unpredictable elements is generated by combining a different element index i of each of the unpredictable elements and a random initial vector; and wherein the random initial vector is generated from the random number.

[0022] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: enciphering a random number using the block cipher using the secret key to generate a random initial vector; and using this random initial vector to generate the elements of the sequence of unpredictable elements.

[0023] In a further aspect of the present invention, the random vector is generated by enciphering a random number of <b>1</b> bits in length, the enciphering using the block cipher using a secret second key.

[0024] In a further aspect of the present invention, the random vector is generated by enciphering a variant of the random number of l bits in length, the enciphering using the block cipher using the secret key.

[0025] In a further aspect of the present invention, the variant of the random number is obtained by adding a non-zero constant to the random number.

[0026] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: wherein the random number is provided by a random number generator; and outputting the random number as an output block of the authentication scheme.

[0027] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: generating the random initial vector by enciphering a count of a counter initialized to a constant, the enciphering being performed with the block cipher using the secret key; generating the random vector block from the count of a counter; and incrementing the counter by one on every message signing.

[0028] In a further aspect of the present invention, the random vector block is generated by enciphering the count of a counter using a second secret key.

[0029] In a further aspect of the present invention, the random vector is generated by enciphering a variant of the count of a counter, the enciphering using the block cipher using the secret key.

[0030] In a further aspect of the present invention, the variant of the of the count of a counter is obtained by adding a non-zero constant to the count of counter.

[0031] In a further aspect of the present invention, the counter is initialized to a constant whose value is the t-bit representation of negative one.

[0032] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: outputting the counter value as an output block of the authentication scheme.

[0033] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: wherein the random vector is generated from a shared, per-key, random initialization vector and the count of a counter; incrementing the counter by one on every message signing, wherein the counter is initialized to a constant whose value is the l-bit representation of negative one; and outputting the counter value as an output block of the authentication scheme.

[0034] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combination operation comprises a bit-wise exclusive-or operation.

[0035] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combination operation comprises an addition modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b>.

[0036] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combination operation comprises a subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b>.

[0037] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combining step to create a plurality of input blocks comprises an addition modulo <b>2</b>^loperation.

[0038] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combining step to create a plurality of input blocks comprises a bit-wise exclusive-or operation.

[0039] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combining step to create a plurality of input blocks comprises a subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^loperation.

[0040] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: generating a random initial vector from a random number of l-bit length; and generating each element in the sequence of unpredictable elements by modular <b>2</b>^lmultiplication of a different unique element identifier (i) for each element in the sequence of unpredictable elements and the random initial vector.

[0041] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: generating a random initial vector from a random number of l-bit length; and generating each element in the sequence of unpredictable elements from the previous element by modular <b>2</b>^laddition of the random initial vector to the previous element, with a first element of the sequence being the random initial vector itself.

[0042] In a further aspect of the present invention, the performing a randomization function over the plurality of plaintext blocks and the random vector block is done concurrently for each plaintext block and the random vector block.

[0043] In a further aspect of the present invention, the plurality of input blocks resulting from performing a randomization function over the plurality of plaintext blocks and the random vector block are concurrently presented to a plurality of block ciphers using a secret key.

[0044] In a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication method is provided that includes a data signing function that determines an authentication tag, comprising the steps of: receiving an input plaintext string comprising the data to be signed and padding it as necessary such that its length is a multiple of l bits; partitioning the padded input plaintext string into a plurality of n equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; performing a randomization function over the plurality of n plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; and performing a combination operation over the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0045] In a further aspect of the present invention, the step of performing a randomization function over said plurality of n plaintext blocks comprises combining each of said plurality of plaintext blocks with a different corresponding element of a plurality of n unpredictable elements to create a plurality of input blocks.

[0046] In a further aspect of the present invention, each of the said plurality of n unpredictable elements is obtained by applying an operation to a different per-message unpredictable element and each of a plurality of internal unpredictable elements.

[0047] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: the per-message unpredictable element is obtained from an l-bit counter and a secret, first random initial vector shared between sender and receiver;and each of the plurality of internal unpredictable elements is obtained from an l-bit element index and a secret, second random initial vector shared between sender and receiver.

[0048] In a further aspect of the present invention, the operation applied to a different per-message unpredictable element and each of a plurality of internal unpredictable elements comprises an addition modulo <b>2</b>^loperation.

[0049] In a further aspect of the present invention, the operation applied to a different per-message unpredictable element and each of a plurality of internal unpredictable elements comprises a subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^loperation.

[0050] In a further aspect of the present invention, the operation applied to a different per-message unpredictable element and each of a plurality of internal unpredictable elements comprises a bit-wise exclusive-or operation.

[0051] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: the per-message unpredictable element is obtained by multiplication modulo <b>2</b>^lof said secret, first random initial vector with a different value of the counter; and each of the plurality of internal unpredictable elements is obtained by multiplication modulo <b>2</b>^lof said secret, second random initial vector with a different value of the index.

[0052] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: the per-message unpredictable element is obtained from the previous per-message unpredictable element by modular <b>2</b>^laddition of said first random initial vector to the previous per-message unpredictable element, with a first per-message unpredictable element being said first random initial vector itself; and each of the plurality of internal unpredictable elements is obtained from the previous internal unpredictable element by modular <b>2</b>^laddition of said second random initial vector to the previous internal unpredictable element, with a first internal unpredictable element being said second random initial vector itself.

[0053] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combining step to create a plurality of input blocks comprises an addition modulo <b>2</b>^loperation.

[0054] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combining step to create a plurality of input blocks comprises a subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^loperation.

[0055] In a further aspect of the present invention, the said combining step to create a plurality of input blocks comprises a bit-wise exclusive-or operation.

[0056] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: generating said counter anew for every new key; initializing generated counter to a constant value; for each message being signed using key, incrementing said counter by the one; and outputting said counter as an output block of the authentication scheme.

[0057] In a further aspect of the present invention, the said combination operation comprises a bit-wise exclusive-or operation.

[0058] In a further aspect of the present invention, the combination operation comprises an addition modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b>.

[0059] In a further aspect of the present invention, the said combination operation comprises a subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b>.

[0060] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a verification method is provided for an authentication method, which provides data integrity, comprising the steps of: presenting a string including a plaintext string and an input authentication tag for verification; partitioning the plaintext string into a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each; performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; performing the same combination operation as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of enciphered blocks to compute an authentication tag; verifying integrity of the plaintext blocks by comparing the input authentication tag and the computed authentication tag.

[0061] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises the steps of: creating a secret random vector block of l bits in length; performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of plaintext blocks and the secret random vector block to create a plurality of input blocks each of t bits in length; wherein performing the randomization function further comprises: deriving a random initial vector from the string presented for decryption; generating a sequence of unpredictable elements each of l-bit length from the random initial vector in the same manner as used at signing method; and selecting n plaintext blocks from the string in the same order as that used at the signing method, and combining the selected plaintext blocks and the random vector with a different corresponding element of the sequence of unpredictable elements to obtain a plurality of input blocks, in the same manner as that used at the signing method.

[0062] In a another aspect of the present invention, the performing the randomization function further comprises: using a secret, random initial vector shared between sender and receiver; generating a sequence of unpredictable elements each of t-bit length from the secret, random initial vector in the same manner as used at signing method; and selecting n plaintext blocks from the string in the same order as that used at the signing method, and combining the selected plaintext blocks with a different corresponding element of the sequence of unpredictable elements to obtain a plurality of input blocks, in the same manner as that used at the signing method.

[0063] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: selecting one block of the from the string presented for authentication, which block contains a random number; and enciphering the selected block to obtain the random initial vector using the block cipher using a first secret key.

[0064] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: for the signing method generating a random initial vector by enciphering a count of a counter initialized to a constant, the enciphering being performed with the block cipher using a secret key; and incrementing the counter by one on every message signing; and further comprising for authentication of the partitioned plaintext string the steps of: selecting a counter block representing the count of the counter from the string presented at verification; and enciphering the selected counter block to obtain a random initial vector.

[0065] In a further aspect of the present invention, the enciphering step comprises performing the enciphering using the block cipher using the secret key.

[0066] In a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication method is provided that includes a data signing function that updates an authentication tag incrementally, comprising the steps of: receiving an input plaintext string comprising the data to be signed and padding it as necessary such that its length is a multiple of l bits; partitioning the padded input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; performing a randomization function over said plurality of plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; performing a combination operation over said plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag, said combination operation having an inverse; and further comprising the steps of: receiving an input plaintext string including a plaintext string and an input authentication tag; partitioning said plaintext string into a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each; receiving a new l-bit input plaintext block to replace an l-bit plaintext block of said input plaintext string at index i; performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method, using index i, on said new input plaintext block to create a first input block and performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method, using index i, on said plaintext block at index i to create a second input block, each of the said created input blocks having l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key to the first input block and the second input block to create a first enciphered block and a second enciphered block, each of L bits in length; performing the inverse of said combination operation used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag to the input authentication tag and said second enciphered block; performing the said combination operation used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag to first enciphered block and the result of performing the inverse of said combination operation; and outputting the result of performing said combination operation to the first enciphered block and the result of performing the inverse of said combination operation as the authentication tag.

[0067] In a further aspect, the present invention comprises: receiving a plurality of new l-bit input plaintext blocks to replace a plurality of l-bit plaintext blocks of said input plaintext string at index i; and providing a data signing function that determines an authentication tag incrementally for each of the said plurality of new l-bit input plaintext blocks.

[0068] In a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication method is provided that includes a data signing function that determines an authentication tag, comprising the steps of: receiving an input plaintext string comprising the data to be signed and padding it as necessary such that its length is a multiple of l bits; partitioning the padded input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; performing a randomization function over each of said plurality of plaintext blocks using a different index for each plaintext block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; performing a combination operation over said plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag; and further providing an out-of-order verification function for the authentication method comprising the steps of: receiving an input authentication tag for verification and a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each, each plaintext block being accompanied by a different index; performing a randomization function over each of said plurality of plaintext blocks using said index for each plaintext block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; performing the same combination operation as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over said plurality of enciphered blocks to compute an authentication tag; verifying integrity of the plaintext blocks by comparing the input authentication tag and the computed authentication tag.

[0069] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication system is provided for a data signing function that determines an authentication tag for use in conjunction with transfer of data using a communication channel or with data storage on storage media, comprising: a partitioner for partitioning the data into a plurality of data blocks; a randomization component which, for each of the data blocks, performs a randomization function over the data block to create an input block of the same size as that of the data block, the input block not including a block identifier; a pseudo-random encipher component for applying a pseudo-random function to each the input block to create a plurality of enciphered blocks; and a combining component for combining the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0070] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication system for providing a data signing function is disclosed that determines an authentication tag, comprising: a partitioner for partitioning an input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; a first component for creating a random vector of l bits in length; a second component for performing a randomization function over the plurality of plaintext blocks and the random vector block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; a block cipher component for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; and a combining component for performing a combination operation over the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0071] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication system for providing a data signing function is disclosed that determines an authentication tag, comprising: a partitioning component for partitioning a padded input plaintext string into a plurality of n equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; a first component for performing a randomization function over the plurality of n plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; a second component for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; and a combining component for performing a combination operation over the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0072] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a verification system for an authentication method which provides data integrity is disclosed comprising: a receiver for receiving a string including a plaintext string and an input authentication tag for verification; a partitioner component for partitioning the plaintext string into a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each; a first component for performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; a second component for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; a combining component for performing the same combination operation as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of enciphered blocks to compute an authentication tag; and a comparator for verifying integrity of the plaintext blocks by comparing the input authentication tag and the computed authentication tag.

[0073] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication system is provided for a data signing function that updates an authentication tag incrementally, comprising: a partitioner for partitioning an input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; a first component for performing a randomization function over said plurality of plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; a block cipher component for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; a combining component for performing a combination operation over said plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag, said combination operation having an inverse; and further comprising: a receiver for receiving an input plaintext string including a plaintext string and an input authentication tag; a partitioner component for partitioning said plaintext string into a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each; a second receiver for receiving a new l-bit input plaintext block to replace an l-bit plaintext block of said input plaintext string at index i; a component for performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method, using index i, on said new input plaintext block to create a first input block and performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method, using index i, on said plaintext block at index i to create a second input block, each of the said created input blocks having l bits in length; a third component for applying a block cipher using a secret key to the first input block and the second input block to create a first enciphered block and a second enciphered block, each of L bits in length; a fourth component for performing the inverse of said combination operation used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag to the input authentication tag and said second enciphered block; a fifth component for performing the said combination operation used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag to first enciphered block and the result of performing the inverse of said combination operation; and a sixth component for outputting the result of performing said combination operation to the first enciphered block and the result of performing the inverse of said combination operation as the authentication tag.

[0074] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, an authentication system is provided for a data signing function that determines an authentication tag, comprising: a partitioner for partitioning the padded input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; a randomization component for performing a randomization function over each of said plurality of plaintext blocks using a different index for each plaintext block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; a pseudo-random encipher component for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; a combining component for combining said plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag; and further providing an out-of-order verification function for the authentication method comprising: a receiver for receiving an input authentication tag for verification and a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each, each plaintext block being accompanied by a different index; a randomization component for performing a randomization function over each of said plurality of plaintext blocks using said index for each plaintext block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; a pseudo-random encipher component for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; a combining component for performing the same combination operation as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over said plurality of enciphered blocks to compute an authentication tag; a comparator for verifying integrity of the plaintext blocks by comparing the input authentication tag and the computed authentication tag.

[0075] In a yet further embodiment of the present invention, a program product for providing a data signing function that determines an authentication tag for use in conjunction with transfer of data using a communication channel or with data storage on storage media is disclosed, comprising computer readable program code, including: first code for partitioning the data into a plurality of data blocks; second code which, for each of the data blocks, performs a randomization function over the data block to create an input block of the same size as that of the data block, the input block not including a block identifier; third code for applying a pseudo-random function to each the input block to create a plurality of enciphered blocks; and fourth code for combining the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0076] In a yet further embodiment of the present invention, a program product for providing a data signing function that determines an authentication tag is disclosed, comprising computer readable program code including: code for partitioning an input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; code for creating a random vector of l bits in length; code for performing a randomization function over the plurality of plaintext blocks and the random vector block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; code for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; and code for performing a combination operation over the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0077] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a program product for providing a data signing function that determines an authentication tag is disclosed, comprising computer readable program code including: first code for partitioning a padded input plaintext string into a plurality of n equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; second code for performing a randomization function over the plurality of n plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; third code for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; and code for performing a combination operation over the plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag.

[0078] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a program product for an authentication method, which provides data integrity, is disclosed comprising: first code for receiving a string including a plaintext string and an input authentication tag for verification; second code for partitioning the plaintext string into a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each; third code for performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; fourth code for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the the input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; fifth code for performing the same combination operation as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over the plurality of enciphered blocks to compute an authentication tag; and sixth code for verifying integrity of the plaintext blocks by comparing the input authentication tag and the computed authentication tag.

[0079] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a program product for providing a data signing function updates an authentication tag incrementally is disclosed, comprising: first code for partitioning an input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; second code for performing a randomization function over said plurality of plaintext blocks to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; third code for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; fourth code for performing a combination operation over said plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag, said combination operation having an inverse; and further comprising: fifth code for receiving an input plaintext string including a plaintext string and an input authentication tag; sixth code for partitioning said plaintext string into a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each; seventh code for receiving a new l-bit input plaintext block to replace an l-bit plaintext block of said input plaintext string at index i; eighth code for performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method, using index i, on said new input plaintext block to create a first input block and performing the same randomization function as that used at a signing method, using index i, on said plaintext block at index i to create a second input block, each of the said created input blocks having l bits in length; ninth code for applying a block cipher using a secret key to the first input block and the second input block to create a first enciphered block and a second enciphered block, each of L bits in length; tenth code for performing the inverse of said combination operation used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag to the input authentication tag and said second enciphered block; eleventh code for performing the said combination operation used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag to first enciphered block and the result of performing the inverse of said combination operation; and twelfth code for outputting the result of performing said combination operation to the first enciphered block and the result of performing the inverse of said combination operation as the authentication tag.

[0080] In yet a further embodiment of the present invention, a program product for providing a data signing function that determines an authentication tag is disclosed: first code for partitioning the padded input plaintext string into a plurality of equal-size plaintext blocks of l bits in length; second code for performing a randomization function over each of said plurality of plaintext blocks using a different index for each plaintext block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; third code for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; fourth code for combining said plurality of enciphered blocks to create an authentication tag; and further providing an out-of-order verification function for the authentication method comprising: fifth code for receiving an input authentication tag for verification and a plurality of n plaintext blocks comprising l bits each, each plaintext block being accompanied by a different index; sixth code for performing a randomization function over each of said plurality of plaintext blocks using said index for each plaintext block to create a plurality of input blocks each of l bits in length; seventh code for applying a block cipher using a secret key over each of the said input blocks to create a plurality of enciphered blocks each of L bits in length; eighth code for performing the same combination operation as that used at a signing method for determining an authentication tag over said plurality of enciphered blocks to compute an authentication tag; ninth code for verifying integrity of the plaintext blocks by comparing the input authentication tag and the computed authentication tag.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0081] For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference should be made to the following Detailed Description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0082]FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram of the method of the present invention for the signing of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄using keys K and K′ to obtain output tag w.

[0083]FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic diagram of the method of the present invention for the authentication of the input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using keys K and K′.

[0084]FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of the method of the present invention for the signing of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄using one key K to obtain output tag w.

[0085]FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic diagram of the method of the present invention for the authentication of the input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using one key K.

[0086]FIG. 5 illustrates a schematic diagram for the preferred embodiment of this invention of the stateless authentication scheme in which input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄is signed using keys K and K′ to obtain output tag w.

[0087]FIG. 6 illustrates a schematic diagram for the preferred embodiment of the invention of the stateless scheme for the verification of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using keys K and K′.

[0088]FIG. 7 illustrates a schematic diagram for the preferred embodiment of the invention of the stateful authentication scheme in which input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄is signed using keys K and K′ to obtain output tag w.

[0089]FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic diagram for the preferred embodiment of the invention of the stateful scheme for the verification of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using keys K and K′.

[0090]FIG. 9 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateless authentication scheme in which input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄is signed using one key K to obtain output tag w.

[0091]FIG. 10 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateless scheme for the verification of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using one key K.

[0092]FIG. 11 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateful authentication scheme in which input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄is signed using one key K to obtain output tag w.

[0093]FIG. 12 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateful scheme for the verification of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using one key K.

[0094]FIG. 13 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateful authentication scheme using a per-key random vector in which input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄is signed using one key K to obtain output tag w.

[0095]FIG. 14 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateful scheme using a per-key random vector for the verification of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using one key K.

[0096]FIG. 15 illustrates a schematic diagram for yet another alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateful authentication scheme using two per-key random initial vectors in which input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄is signed using one key K to obtain output tag w.

[0097]FIG. 16 illustrates a schematic diagram for yet another alternate embodiment of the invention of the stateful scheme using two per-key random initial vectors for the verification of input plaintext string x=x₁x₂x₃x₄and input authentication tag w′ using one key K.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0098] The inventors have recognized, and it is an aspect of this invention, that it is highly advantageous to provide authentication schemes that (1) rely exclusively on the use of block ciphers, (2) can be implemented in a concurrent (i.e., parallel or pipelined) manner in addition to standard sequential processing, (3) can be used for incremental and out-of-order processing authentication tags, and (4) can be used for the authentication of real-time data sources where message length remains unknown until the entire message is received, and commencing message authentication cannot be deferred until the end of the message

[0099] Referring to FIG. 1, a plaintext string x <b>23</b> representing input data is presented to a signing function <b>61</b> of an authentication scheme providing data integrity resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b> for plaintext string x <b>23</b>. It is assumed that the sender and the receiver share a pair of secret keys K and K′ (i.e., a first key K <b>31</b>, and a second key K′ <b>32</b>) and that a random-number generator <b>70</b> is available. Keys K and K′ have the same length k and may be derived, in one embodiment, from a master key using key separation techniques well-known in the art. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is padded where necessary in some standard fashion so that it is a multiple of l bits. The padding is not shown in FIG. 1, as it is commonly known in the data processing art. It is assumed that the plaintext string x <b>23</b> is composed of n l-bit plaintext blocks <b>21</b>. FIG. 1 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n =<b>4</b> blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0100] To clarify for purposes of explanation, F is an L-bit to L-bit block cipher with key length k, where L≧l. F_Kis the l-bit to L-bit block cipher F using secret key K, and F_K′is the l-bit to L-bit block cipher F using secret key K′. F_K(b) is an L-bit block representing the enciphering of the l-bit block b by F_K. Similarly, F_K′(b) is an L-bit block representing the enciphering of the l-bit block b by F_K′. Note that the block cipher used with the present invention could be any block cipher. By way of example but not by way of limitation, examples of block ciphers include DES, IDEA, and the block ciphers referred to in the Handbook of Applied Cryptography noted previously, pseudo-random functions, and any other convenient block cipher including the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) being considered for standardization by NIST.

[0101] The random-number generator <b>70</b> outputs a random number r_o<b>71</b> of l bits in length. In an alternate embodiment, the random number r_o<b>71</b> is shared between the sender and the receiver, and hence it need not be generated by a random-number generator <b>70</b>. In the alternate embodiment the sender and the receiver generate the same shared random number r_o<b>71</b> from an already shared secret key using key separation techniques well-known in the art.

[0102] The random number r_o<b>71</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>52</b> together with the shared secret keys K <b>31</b> and K′ <b>32</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and the random vector z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. The random number r_o<b>71</b> is enciphered by F_K<b>40</b>, the block cipher F using the first key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The random number r_o<b>71</b> is also enciphered using F_K′<b>42</b>, the block cipher F using the second key K′ <b>32</b>, to obtain a random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. FIG. 1 shows an example where n=4 and x₅=z_o.

[0103] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_1,. . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=<b>4</b> are input to the tag computation function <b>50</b> that computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>.

[0104] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_1,. . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, are subjected to a randomization step comprising, in one embodiment, applying a combination operation <b>83</b> on each of the input plaintext blocks x_i<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> with each l-bit element E_i82 of a sequence of n+1 unpredictable elements. Each of these elements E_i<b>82</b> is unpredictable because it is obtained by combining y_o<b>81</b>, the random initial vector, and the element identifier i, such that for any given l-bit constant a, the probability of the event E_i=a is negligible, wherein the notion of negligible probability is well-known to those skilled in the art (viz., M. Naor and O. Reingold: “From Unpredictability to Indistinguishability: A Simple Construction of Pseudo-Random Functions from MACs,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '98 (LNCS 1462), pp. 267-282, 1998; M. Bellare, A. Desai, E. Jokipii, and P. Rogaway: “A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Authentication,” Proceedings of the 38th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1997, pp. 394-403). The fact that these elements E_i<b>82</b> are unpredictable means that enough of their l bits remain unknown so that the probability of the event E_i=a is negligible. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements E_i<b>82</b> are computed in a parallel manner. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements E_i<b>82</b> are computed in a pipelined manner. In a yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, when the signing of plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b> is not performed concurrently, each element of the sequence E_i+1(where i≧1) is generated from the previous element E_iby modular <b>2</b>^laddition of the random initial vector y_o, the first element of the sequence being y_oitself, namely E_i=y_o.

[0105] In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the modular <b>2</b>^laddition, whereby each block input to the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i+E_imodulo <b>2</b>^l. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation, whereby each input block for the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i⊕ E_i. In yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is modular <b>2</b>^lsubtraction operation, whereby each input block for the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i-E_imodulo <b>2</b>^l. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations that allow the combination <b>83</b> in parallel for all plaintext input blocks may also be used for operation <b>83</b>. It is also understood by those skilled in the art that any combination <b>83</b> that can be performed in parallel can also be performed in a pipelined manner and also in a sequential manner as may be appropriate for the alternate embodiments of this invention.

[0106] Accordingly, the randomization step applied to the plurality of input plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, results in a plurality of l-bit input blocks to be applied to a block cipher F_K<b>41</b>. These input blocks from element <b>83</b> are enciphered by the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b>, to thereby generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. Note that in one embodiment, the input blocks enciphered, including the random vector <b>22</b>, have the same size as the input plaintext blocks. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the plurality of input blocks is generated in parallel and then it is submitted concurrently to a plurality of the block ciphers F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> to thereby generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. In an alternate embodiment, when the plurality input is not generated in parallel, the plurality of input blocks is submitted sequentially to a block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> to thereby generate a plurality of enciphered blocks.

[0107] The plurality of enciphered blocks resulting from the block ciphers <b>41</b> are further combined at <b>84</b> to yield the L-bit output tag w <b>24</b> for plaintext string x <b>23</b>. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation. In an alternate embodiment of the method of this invention, the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition. In yet another alternate embodiment of the method of this invention, the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^l-<b>1</b> subtraction. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations may also be used for operation <b>84</b>.

[0108] The plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b>, the random number r_o<b>71</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0109]FIG. 2 represents the verification at a receiver of an L-bit input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> for a plaintext string x <b>23</b> using an l-bit random number r_o<b>71</b>. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the random number r_o<b>71</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>61</b>, described in FIG. 1, using a pair of secret keys K and K′ (i.e., a first key K <b>31</b>, and a second key K′ <b>32</b>) resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b> of L-bit length. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at block <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and, if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 2 shows an example plaintext string x <b>23</b> composed of n=4, l-bit blocks, x=x_ix₂x₃x₄.

[0110]FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic diagram of the method of the present invention for the signing at <b>62</b> of input plaintext string x <b>23</b> using a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver to obtain an output tag w <b>24</b>. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is padded in some standard fashion so that it is a multiple of l bits, and is partitioned into n l- bit plaintext blocks <b>21</b>. FIG. 3 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0111] The random-number generator <b>70</b> outputs a random number r_o<b>71</b> of l bits in length. In an alternate embodiment, the random number r_o<b>71</b> is shared between the sender and the receiver, and hence the random number need not be generated by a random-number generator <b>70</b>. In the alternate embodiment the sender and the receiver generate the same shared random number r_o<b>71</b> from an already shared secret key using key separation techniques well-known in the art.

[0112] The random number r_o<b>71</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>53</b> together with one shared secret key K <b>31</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and r_o+c <b>55</b> is used to generate the random vector z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. The random number r_o<b>71</b> is enciphered by F_K<b>40</b>, the block cipher F using key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The variant r_o+c <b>55</b> (where constant c is not zero) of the random number r_o<b>71</b> is also enciphered using F_K<b>43</b>, the block cipher F using the same key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. FIG. 3 shows an example in which the variant of the random number (<b>55</b>) is obtained from the addition modulo <b>2</b>^lof the random number r_o<b>71</b> with a constant c, where c is not zero, and n=4, x₅=z_o. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other variants of the number <b>55</b> may also be used as input to F_K<b>43</b>, the block cipher F using key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length.

[0113] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x₁, . . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, are input to the tag computation function <b>50</b>, which as described in FIG. 1, computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The plaintext blocks x₁, . . . , x_n<b>21</b>, the random number r_o<b>71</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on the storage media.

[0114]FIG. 4 represents the verification of an L-bit input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> for a plaintext string x <b>23</b> using an l-bit random number r_o<b>71</b>. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the random number r_o<b>71</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>62</b>, as described in FIG. 3, using a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b> of t-bit length. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> received with the plaintext string, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and, if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 4 shows an example plaintext string x <b>23</b> composed of n=

[0115]<b>4</b>, l-bit blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0116]FIG. 5 illustrates a schematic diagram for the preferred embodiment of this invention of the stateless authentication scheme. The input string x <b>23</b> (which is padded in a standard way) containing n plaintext blocks x_i<b>21</b> is signed by the signing function <b>63</b> of the authentication scheme resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b>. The signing function <b>63</b> uses a pair of secret keys K and K′ (i.e., a first key K <b>31</b>, and a second key K′ <b>32</b>). FIG. 5 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n <b>4</b> blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0117] In the preferred embodiment of this invention of the stateless authentication scheme, the random-number generator <b>70</b> outputs a random number r_o<b>71</b> of l bits in length. In an alternate embodiment, the random number r_o<b>71</b> is shared between the sender and the receiver, and hence it need not be generated by a random-number generator <b>70</b>. In the alternate embodiment the sender and the receiver generate the same shared random number r_o<b>71</b> from an already shared secret key using key separation techniques well-known in the art.

[0118] The random number r_o<b>71</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>52</b>, as described in FIG. 1, together with the shared secret key K <b>31</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and together with the shared secret key K′ <b>32</b> to generate the random vector z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. FIG. 5 shows an example where n=<b>4</b> and x₅=z_o.

[0119] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4 are input to the tag computation function <b>51</b> that computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>.

[0120] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, are subjected to a randomization step comprising, in one embodiment, applying a combination operation <b>83</b> to each of the input plaintext block x_i<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> with each l-bit element y_o×i <b>82</b> of a sequence of n+1 elements, where i=1, . . . , n+1. Each of these elements y_o×i <b>82</b> is unpredictable because it is obtained by modular <b>2</b>^lmultiplication of y_o<b>81</b>, the random initial vector, with the element identifier i, such that for any given l-bit constant a, the probability of the event y_o×i=a is negligible, wherein the notion of negligible probability is well-known to those skilled in the art (viz., M. Naor and O. Reingold: “From Unpredictability to Indistinguishability: A Simple Construction of Pseudo-Random Functions from MACs,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '98 (LNCS 1462), pp. 267-282, 1998; M. Bellare, A. Desai, E. Jokipii, and P. Rogaway: “A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Authentication,” Proceedings of the 38th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1997, pp. 394-403). The fact that these elements y_o×i <b>82</b> are unpredictable means that enough of their l bits remain unknown so that the probability of the event y_o×i=a is negligible. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements y_o×i <b>82</b> are computed in a parallel manner. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements y_o×i <b>82</b> are computed in a pipelined manner. In a yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, when the signing of plaintext x <b>23</b> is performed sequentially, each element of the sequence y_o×(i+1) (where i≧1) is generated from the previous element y_o×i by modular <b>2</b>^laddition of the random initial vector y_o, the first element of the sequence being y_oitself. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art, and is a further aspect of this invention, that the unpredictable elements <b>82</b> can be obtained in other ways that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements are the elements of the linear congruence sequence defined by aⁱ×y_o, where y_ois the random initial vector <b>81</b>, i is the element index, i=1, . . . , n+1, and a is called the multiplier and is chosen to pass all the necessary spectral tests as described by D. E. Knuth in “The Art of Computer Programming—Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms,” Addison-Wesley, 1981 (second edition), Chapter 3, incorporated herein by reference.

[0121] In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the modular <b>2</b>^laddition, whereby each block input to the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i+(y_o×i) modulo <b>2</b>. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation, whereby each input block for the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i⊕ (y_o×i). In yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is a modular <b>2</b>^lsubtraction operation, whereby each input block for the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i−(y_o×i) modulo <b>2</b>^l. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations that allow the combination <b>83</b> in parallel for all plaintext input blocks may also be used for operation <b>83</b>. It is also understood by those skilled in the art that any combination <b>83</b> that can be performed in parallel can also be performed in a pipelined manner and also in a sequential manner as may be appropriate for the alternate embodiments of this invention.

[0122] The randomization step applied to the plurality of input plaintext blocks x_1,. . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, result in a plurality of l-bit input blocks to the block cipher F_K. The input blocks are enciphered using the block cipher F_Kusing the first key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. Note that in one embodiment, the input blocks enciphered, including the random vector <b>22</b>, have the same size as the input plaintext blocks. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the plurality of input blocks are generated in parallel, and then submitted concurrently to a plurality of block ciphers F_Kusing the first key K <b>31</b> to thereby generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. In an alternate embodiment, the plurality of input blocks is submitted sequentially to a block cipher F_Kusing the first key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks.

[0123] The plurality of enciphered blocks are further combined at element <b>84</b> to yield the L-bit output tag w <b>24</b> for the plaintext string x <b>23</b>. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation in element <b>84</b> is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation. In an alternate embodiment of the method of this invention, the combination operation in element <b>84</b> is the modular <b>2</b>^l-<b>1</b> addition. In yet another alternate embodiment of the method of this invention the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtraction. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations may also be used for operation <b>84</b>.

[0124] The plaintext blocks x_1,. . . , x_n<b>21</b>, the random number r_o<b>71</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0125]FIG. 6 represents the verification of a plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the random number r_o<b>71</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>63</b>, as described in FIG. 5, using a pair of secret keys K and K′ (i.e., a first key K <b>31</b>, and a second key K′ <b>32</b>) resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b>. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at element <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 6 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0126]FIG. 7 illustrates a schematic diagram for the preferred embodiment of this invention of the two-key stateful authentication scheme. The input string x <b>23</b> (which is padded in a standard way) containing n plaintext blocks x, <b>21</b> is signed by the signing function <b>64</b> of the authentication scheme resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b>. The signing function <b>64</b> uses a pair of secret keys K and K′ (i.e., a first key K <b>31</b>, and a second key K′ <b>32</b>). FIG. 7 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0127] In this embodiment of the method of the invention, a counter ctr <b>72</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>54</b> together with the shared secret key K <b>31</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and the shared secret key K′ <b>32</b> to generate the random vector z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. The counter ctr <b>72</b> is enciphered using F_K<b>44</b>, the block cipher F using the first key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The counter ctr <b>72</b> is also enciphered using F_K′<b>45</b>, the block cipher F using the second key K′ <b>32</b>, to obtain a random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. FIG. 7 shows an example where n=4 and x₅=z_o.

[0128] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_1,. . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4 are input to the tag computation function <b>51</b> that computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>.

[0129] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_1,. . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, are subjected to a randomization step comprising, in one embodiment, applying a combination operation <b>83</b> to each of the input plaintext blocks x <b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> with each l-bit element y_o&gt;i <b>82</b> of a sequence of n+1 elements, where i=1, . . . , n+1. Each of these elements <b>82</b> y_o×i is unpredictable because it is obtained by modular <b>2</b>^lmultiplication of y_o<b>81</b>, the random initial vector, with the element identifier i, such that for any given l-bit constant a, the probability of the event y_o×i=a is negligible, wherein the notion of negligible probability is well-known to those skilled in the art (viz., M. Naor and O. Reingold: “From Unpredictability to Indistinguishability: A Simple Construction of Pseudo-Random Functions from MACs,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '98 (LNCS 1462), pp. 267-282, 1998; M. Bellare, A. Desai, E. Jokipii, and P. Rogaway: “A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Authentication,” Proceedings of the 38th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1997, pp. 394-403). The fact that these elements y_o×i <b>82</b> are unpredictable means that enough of their l bits remain unknown so that the probability of the event y_o×i=a is negligible. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements y_o×i <b>82</b> are computed in a parallel manner. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements y_o×i <b>82</b> are computed in a pipelined manner. In a yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, when the signing of plaintext x <b>23</b> is performed sequentially, each element of the sequence y_o×(i+1) (where i≧1) is generated from the previous element y_o×i by modular <b>2</b>^laddition of the random initial vector y_o, the first element of the sequence being y_oitself. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art, and is a further aspect of this invention, that the unpredictable elements <b>82</b> can be obtained in other ways that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements are the elements of the linear congruence sequence defined by aⁱ×y_o, where y_ois the random initial vector <b>81</b>, i is the element index, i=1, . . . , n+1, and a is called the multiplier and is chosen to pass all the necessary spectral tests as described by D. E. Knuth in “The Art of Computer Programming—Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms,” Addison-Wesley, 1981 (second edition), Chapter 3, incorporated herein by reference.

[0130] In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the modular <b>2</b>^laddition, whereby each block input to the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i+(y_o×i) modulo <b>2</b>^l. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation, whereby each input block for the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i⊕ (y_o×i). In yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is modular <b>2</b>^lsubtraction operation, whereby each input block for the block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> is obtained as x_i−(y_o×i) modulo <b>2</b>^l. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations that allow the combination <b>83</b> in parallel for all plaintext input blocks may also be used for operation <b>83</b>. It is also understood by those skilled in the art that any combination <b>83</b> that can be performed in parallel can also be performed in a pipelined manner and also in a sequential manner as may be appropriate for the alternate embodiments of this invention.

[0131] The randomization step applied to the plurality of input plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4, results in a plurality of l-bit input blocks to the block cipher F_K. The input blocks are enciphered using the block cipher F_Kusing the first key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. Note that in one embodiment, the input blocks enciphered, including the random vector <b>22</b>, have the same size as the input plaintext blocks. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the plurality of input blocks is generated in parallel and then it is submitted concurrently to a plurality of block ciphers F_Kusing the first key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. In an alternate embodiment, the plurality of input blocks is submitted sequentially to a block cipher F_Kusing the first key K <b>31</b> generating a plurality of enciphered blocks.

[0132] The plurality of enciphered blocks is further combined at element <b>84</b> to yield the L-bit output tag w <b>24</b> for the plaintext string x <b>23</b>. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation in element <b>84</b>. In an alternate embodiment of the method of this invention, the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition in element <b>84</b>. In yet another alternate embodiment of the method of this invention, the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtraction in element <b>84</b>. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations may also be used for operation <b>84</b>.

[0133] The plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b>, the counter ctr <b>72</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0134] With the signing of each plaintext string, the current value of the counter ctr is incremented, or otherwise changed to a new value, at block <b>73</b>. FIG. 7 shows an example in which the counter is incremented by <b>1</b>. This new value of the counter is used in the signing of the next plaintext string.

[0135]FIG. 8 represents the verification of a plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the counter ctr <b>72</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>64</b> using a pair of secret keys K and K′ (i.e., a first key K <b>31</b>, and a second key K′ <b>32</b>) resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b>. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 8 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n <b>4</b> blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0136]FIG. 9 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of this invention of the stateless authentication scheme using a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver. The input string x <b>23</b> (which is padded in a standard way) containing n plaintext blocks x, <b>21</b> is signed by signing function <b>65</b> of the authentication scheme resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b>. The signing function <b>65</b> uses one secret key. FIG. 9 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0137] The random number r_o<b>71</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>53</b>, as described in FIG. 3, together with one shared secret key K <b>31</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and the random vector z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length.

[0138] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4 are input to the tag computation function <b>51</b>, as described in FIG. 5, that computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b>, the random number r_o<b>71</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0139]FIG. 10 represents the verification of an L-bit input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> for a plaintext string x <b>23</b> using an l-bit random number r_o<b>71</b>. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the random number r_o<b>71</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>65</b>, described in FIG. 9, using a single secret key K shared by the sender and receiver resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b> of L-bit length. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at element <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and, if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 10 shows an example plaintext string x <b>23</b> composed of n=4, l-bit blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0140]FIG. 11 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of this invention of the stateful authentication scheme using a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver. The input string x <b>23</b> (which is padded in a standard way) containing n plaintext blocks x_i<b>21</b> is signed by the signing function <b>66</b> of the authentication scheme resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b>. The signing function <b>66</b> uses shared secret key K <b>31</b>. FIG. 11 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0141] In this embodiment of the method of the invention a counter ctr <b>72</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>55</b> together with the shared secret key K <b>31</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and the random vector z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. The counter ctr <b>72</b> is enciphered using F_K<b>44</b>, the block cipher F using the shared secret key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. A variant ctr+c <b>56</b> (where constant c is not zero) is also enciphered using F_K<b>46</b>, the block cipher F using the same key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b> of l bits in length. FIG. 11 shows an example in which the variant <b>56</b> is obtained from the addition modulo <b>2</b>^lof the counter ctr <b>72</b> with constant one and n=4, x₅=z_o. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other variants of the number <b>56</b> may also be used as input to F_K<b>46</b>, the block cipher F using key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>.

[0142] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4 are input to the tag computation function <b>51</b>, as described in FIG. 7, that computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The plaintext blocks x_{1, . . .,}x_n<b>21</b>, the counter ctr <b>72</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0143] With the signing of each plaintext string, the current value of the counter ctr is incremented, or otherwise changed to a new value, at <b>74</b> such that this value is not equal to the variant obtained at <b>56</b>. FIG. 11 shows an example in which the counter is incremented by <b>2</b>. This new value of the counter is used in the signing of the next plaintext string.

[0144]FIG. 12 represents the verification of a plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> for the preferred embodiment of this invention of the stateful authentication scheme using a single secret key K shared by the sender and receiver. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the counter ctr <b>72</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>66</b>, as described in FIG. 11, using a shared secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b>. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at element <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 12 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0145]FIG. 13 illustrates a schematic diagram for an alternate embodiment of this invention for the stateful authentication scheme using a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver. The input string x <b>23</b> (which is padded in a standard way) containing n plaintext blocks x_i<b>21</b> is signed by the signing function <b>67</b> of the authentication scheme resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b>. The signing function <b>67</b> uses a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver. FIG. 13 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x_{i x}₂x₃x₄.

[0146] In this alternate embodiment of the invention, a counter ctr <b>72</b> is used in the initialization function for tag computation <b>56</b> together with the shared secret key K <b>31</b> to generate the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The counter ctr <b>72</b> is enciphered using F_K<b>44</b>, the block cipher F using shared secret key K <b>31</b>, to obtain the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. In this embodiment of the method of the invention, random initialization vector IV <b>57</b> is secret, is generated anew for each new key K <b>31</b>, is shared by the sender and the receiver, and is used for all messages signed and verified with key K <b>31</b>. The random initialization vector IV <b>57</b> is generated and distributed to the sender and receiver in the same standard manner as that used for the shared secret key K <b>31</b>. In an alternate embodiment the sender and the receiver generate the same value of the random initialization vector IV <b>57</b> from the already shared secret key K <b>31</b> using key separation techniques well-known in the art.

[0147] The random vector, x_n+1=z_o=IV+ctr <b>22</b>, is used as the last block. FIG. 13 shows an example in which the variant is obtained from the addition modulo <b>2</b>^lof the initialization vector IV <b>57</b> with the counter ctr <b>72</b> and n=4, x₅=z_o=IV+ctr. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other variants of the number <b>22</b> may also be used as the random vector x_n+1=z_o.

[0148] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b> and the random vector x_n+1=z_o<b>22</b>, where n=4 are input to the tag computation function <b>51</b>, as described in FIG. 7, that computes the tag w <b>24</b> using the random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>. The plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b>, the counter ctr <b>72</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0149] With the signing of each plaintext string, the current value of the counter ctr is incremented, or otherwise changed to a new value, at element <b>73</b>. FIG. 13 shows an example in which the counter is incremented by <b>1</b>. This new value of the counter is used in the signing of the next plaintext string.

[0150]FIG. 14 represents the verification of a plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> in the alternate embodiment of this invention for the stateful authentication scheme using one secret key K. The input plaintext string x <b>23</b> and the counter ctr <b>72</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>67</b> using a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver and the shared random vector z_o<b>22</b> resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b>. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then plaintext string <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 14 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n =<b>4</b> blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0151]FIG. 15 illustrates a schematic diagram of yet another alternate embodiment of the invention of a single-key stateful authentication scheme. The input string x <b>23</b> (which is padded in a standard way) containing n plaintext blocks x_i<b>21</b> is signed by the signing function <b>68</b> of the authentication scheme resulting in an output tag w <b>24</b>. The signing function <b>68</b> uses a single secret key K <b>31</b> shared by the sender and receiver. FIG. 15 shows an example of an input plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0152] The l-bit first random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and the counter ctr <b>72</b> are used to compute the per-message unpredictable element E=y_o×ctr <b>86</b>. Element E=y_o×ctr <b>86</b> is unpredictable because it is obtained by modular <b>2</b>^lmultiplication of y_o<b>81</b>, the l-bit first random initial vector, with ctr, such that for any given l-bit constant a, the probability of the event E=a is negligible, wherein the notion of negligible probability is well-known to those skilled in the art (viz., M. Naor and O. Reingold: “From Unpredictability to Indistinguishability: A Simple Construction of Pseudo-Random Functions from MACs,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '<b>98</b> (LNCS 1462), pp. 267-282, 1998; M. Bellare, A. Desai, E. Jokipii, and P. Rogaway: “A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Authentication,” Proceedings of the 38th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1997, pp. 394-403). The fact that these elements E <b>86</b> are unpredictable means that enough of their l bits remain unknown so that the probability of the event E=a is negligible. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the per-message unpredictable elements E are the elements of the linear congruence sequence defined by aⁱ×y_o, where y_ois the first random initial vector <b>81</b>, i is the element index, i=1, . . . ,n, and a is called the multiplier and is chosen to pass all the necessary spectral tests as described by D. E. Knuth in “The Art of Computer Programming—Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms,” Addison-Wesley, 1981 (second edition), Chapter 3, incorporated herein by reference. The per-message unpredictable element E=y_o×ctr <b>86</b> and the plurality of input plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b>, where n=4, are input to the tag computation function <b>52</b> that computes the output tag w <b>24</b> using an l-bit second random initial vector y*_o<b>85</b>. In this embodiment of the method of the invention, first random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and second random initial vector y*_o<b>85</b> are secret, are generated anew for each new key K <b>31</b>, are shared by the sender and the receiver, and are used for all messages signed and verified with key K <b>31</b>. The first random initial vector y_o<b>81</b> and the second random initial vector y*_o<b>85</b> are generated and distributed to the sender and receiver in the same standard manner as that used for the shared secret key K <b>31</b>. In an alternate embodiment the sender and the receiver generate the same values of y_o<b>81</b> and y*_o<b>85</b> from the already shared secret key K <b>31</b> using key separation techniques well-known in the art.

[0153] The plurality of input plaintext blocks x_i, . . . , x_n<b>21</b>, where n=4, are subjected to a randomization step comprising applying a combination operation <b>83</b> to each of the first n input plaintext blocks x, <b>21</b>, where i=1, . . . , n. In this embodiment, the operation <b>83</b> combines each input plaintext block x_i<b>21</b>, where i=1, . . . , n with each l-bit element E+y*_o×i <b>82</b> of a sequence of n unpredictable elements. FIG. 15 shows an example where n=4, and the combination operation <b>83</b> is applied to input plaintext blocks x_1,x_2,x_3,x₄. In this embodiment, the operation <b>83</b> is addition modulo <b>2</b>^l. In an alternate embodiment, the operation <b>83</b> is subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^l. In yet another embodiment, the operation <b>83</b> is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation. Each of the unpredictable elements E+y*_o×i <b>82</b>, i=1, . . . ,n, is unpredictable because it is obtained by addition modulo <b>2</b>^lof the unpredictable element E and the result of modular <b>2</b>^lmultiplication of y*_o<b>85</b>, the l-bit second random initial vector, with i, such that for any given l-bit constant a, the probability of the event E+y*_o×i=a is negligible, wherein the notion of negligible probability is well-known to those skilled in the art (viz., M. Naor and O. Reingold: “From Unpredictability to Indistinguishability: A Simple Construction of Pseudo-Random Functions from MACS,” Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO '98 (LNCS 1462), pp. 267-282, 1998; M. Bellare, A. Desai, E. Jokipii, and P. Rogaway: “A Concrete Security Treatment of Symmetric Authentication,” Proceedings of the 38th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1997, pp. 394-403). The fact that these elements E+y*_o×i <b>82</b> are unpredictable means that enough of their l bits remain unknown so that the probability of the event E+y*_o×i=a is negligible. In the preferred embodiment, each of the unpredictable elements <b>82</b> are computed by addition modulo <b>2</b>^lof the per-message unpredictable element E <b>86</b> and an internal unpredictable element y*_o×i. In an alternate embodiment, each of the unpredictable <b>82</b> are computed by subtraction modulo <b>2</b>^lof the per-message unpredictable element E <b>86</b> and an internal unpredictable element y*_o×i. In yet another embodiment, each of the unpredictable <b>82</b> are computed by bit-wise exclusive-or operation applied to the per-message unpredictable element E <b>86</b> and an internal unpredictable element y*_o×i. In this embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements E+y*_o×i <b>82</b> are computed in a parallel manner. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements E +y*_o×i <b>82</b> are computed in a pipelined manner. In a yet another alternate embodiment of this invention, when the signing of plaintext x <b>23</b> is performed sequentially, each element of the sequence E +y*_o×(i+1) (where i≧1) is generated from the previous element E+y*_o×i by modular <b>2</b>^laddition of the second random initial vector y*_o, the first element of the sequence being E. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art, and is a further aspect of this invention, that the per element unpredictable element E <b>86</b> and the unpredictable elements <b>82</b> can be obtained in other ways that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the claims. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the unpredictable elements are the elements of the linear congruence sequence defined by E+aⁱ×y*_o, where y_ois the first random initial vector <b>81</b>, i is the element index, i=1, . . . ,n, and a is called the multiplier and is chosen to pass all the necessary spectral tests as described by D. E. Knuth in “The Art of Computer Programming—Volume 2: Seminumerical Algorithms,” Addison-Wesley, 1981 (second edition), Chapter 3, incorporated herein by reference.

[0154] In this embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is the modular <b>2</b>^laddition. In an alternate embodiment of this invention, the combination operation <b>83</b> is modular <b>2</b>^lsubtraction operation. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations that allow the combination <b>83</b> in parallel for all plaintext input blocks may also be used for operation <b>83</b>. It is also understood by those skilled in the art that any combination <b>83</b> that can be performed in parallel can also be performed in a pipelined manner and also in a sequential manner as may be appropriate for the alternate embodiments of this invention.

[0155] The randomization step applied to the plurality of input plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b>, where n=4, results in a plurality of l-bit input blocks to the block cipher. The input blocks are enciphered with the block cipher F_Kusing key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. Note that in one embodiment, the input blocks enciphered have the same size as the input plaintext blocks. In this embodiment of the invention, the plurality of input blocks is generated in parallel and then it is submitted concurrently to a plurality of block ciphers F_Kusing key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks. In an alternate embodiment, the plurality of input blocks is submitted sequentially to a block cipher F_Kusing key K <b>31</b> to generate a plurality of enciphered blocks.

[0156] The plurality of enciphered blocks is further combined at <b>84</b> to yield the L-bit output tag w <b>24</b> for plaintext string x <b>23</b>. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the combination operation is the bit-wise exclusive-or operation. In an alternate embodiment of the method of this invention the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition. In yet another alternate embodiment of the method of this invention, the combination operation is the modular <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtraction. The invention, however, is not so limited, as other combination operations may also be used for operation <b>84</b>.

[0157] The plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b>, the counter ctr <b>72</b>, and the output tag w <b>24</b> form the data transmitted through the communication channels, or stored on a storage media.

[0158] With the signing of each plaintext string, the current value of the counter ctr is incremented, or otherwise changed, to a new value, at <b>76</b>. FIG. 15 shows an example in which the counter is incremented by one. The incremented value of the counter is used in the signing of the input plaintext string of the next message.

[0159]FIG. 16 represents the verification of a plaintext string x <b>23</b> using counter ctr <b>72</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>. First the counter ctr <b>72</b> is compared at <b>78</b> with constant q_srepresenting the maximum number of messages that can be signed. If the comparison ctr &lt;q_sfails, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. If ctr ≦q_sthen the output of the logical “and” operators <b>88</b> applied to the counter ctr <b>72</b>, the first random initial first random initial vector y_o<b>81</b>, the second random initial vector y*_o<b>85</b> and the plaintext blocks x_{1, . . . ,}x_n<b>21</b> are submitted to the signing function <b>68</b> using a single secret key K <b>31</b> resulting in the computed tag w <b>24</b>. The computed tag w <b>24</b> and the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b> are compared for equality at <b>75</b>. If the computed tag w <b>24</b> is equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is accepted as authentic; and if the computed tag w <b>24</b> is not equal to the input authentication tag w′ <b>25</b>, then the input plaintext string x <b>23</b> is rejected. FIG. 16 shows an example plaintext string <b>23</b> composed of n=4 blocks, x=x₁x₂x₃x₄.

[0160] Additional properties of the embodiment of the method of this invention are now presented. In a further aspect, the method of this invention allows the incremental replacement of plaintext blocks without requiring the complete execution of the message signing procedure. That is, if an input plaintext block x_iof an n-block plaintext string x (padded as necessary) is replaced with a new block x′_i, then the new tag w′ is computed from the old tag w using only a small number of invocations of the block cipher that does not depend on the number of blocks of the input plaintext string. For instance, for the preferred embodiment of the stateless authentication scheme using two secret keys K and K′ (viz., FIG. 5), if r_o, the random number of the original input plaintext string x, is the same as the random number for the new input plaintext string x′ in which block x_iof a n-block plaintext string x (padded as necessary) is replaced with a new block x′_i, then the authentication tag w′ of plaintext string x′ is thus computed as follows.

[0161] The new block x′_iand the old block x_iare each subjected to a randomization step comprising, in one embodiment, applying a combination operation <b>83</b> with the i-th element a sequence of n+1 unpredictable l-bit elements, where i=1, . . . , n+1 to produce two l-bit input blocks. The resulting l-bit input blocks, which are of the same size as the input plaintext blocks x′_iand x_i, are enciphered with block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b>. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, the two input blocks are generated in parallel, and then submitted concurrently to two block ciphers F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> to thereby generate said two enciphered blocks. In an alternate embodiment, the two input blocks are submitted sequentially to a block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b> to generate said two enciphered blocks. The enciphered block corresponding to the old input block x_iis combined using a bit-wise exclusive-or operation with the old authentication tag w, if the combination operation <b>84</b> that generates the authentication tag is the exclusive-or. In an alternate embodiment, the enciphered block corresponding to the old input block x, is combined using a modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtraction operation with the old authentication tag w if the combination operation <b>84</b> that generates the authentication tag is the modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition. In a yet another embodiment, the enciphered block corresponding to the old input block xi is combined using a modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition operation with the old authentication tag w if the combination operation <b>84</b> that generates the authentication tag is the modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtraction. The new authentication tag w′ is obtained by further combining the enciphered block corresponding to the new block x_iwith result of the combination of the enciphered block corresponding to the old input block x_iwith the old authentication tag w, said further combination operation being a bit-wise exclusive-or operation if the combination operation <b>84</b> that generates the authentication tag is the exclusive-or. In an alternate embodiment, the new authentication tag w′ is obtained by further combining the enciphered block corresponding to the new block x′_iwith result of the combination of the enciphered block corresponding to the old input block x_iwith the old authentication tag w, said further combination operation being a modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition operation if the combination operation <b>84</b> that generates the authentication tag is the modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> addition. In a yet another embodiment, the new authentication tag w′ is obtained by further combining the enciphered block corresponding to the new block x′_iwith result of the combination of the enciphered block corresponding to the old input block x_iwith the old authentication tag w, said further combination operation being a modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtraction operation if the combination operation <b>84</b> that generates the authentication tag is the modulo <b>2</b>^L-<b>1</b> subtaction. It is readily understood by those skilled in the art that the steps of the incremental block replacement operation can be readily applied to a plurality of new input plaintext blocks x′_i, and to other incremental operations, including deletion of a plurality of input plaintext blocks x_iand insertion of a plurality of new input plaintext blocks x′_i.

[0162] It is readily understood by those skilled in the art that the incremental replacement, deletion, or insertion of a plurality of plaintext blocks without requiring the complete execution of the message signing procedure applies to all other embodiments of this invention, not just to the stateless authentication scheme using two secret keys K and K′.

[0163] In another aspect of this invention, the method of this invention allows out-of-order processing of tag verification. For instance, for the preferred embodiment of the stateless authentication scheme using two secret keys K and K′ (viz., FIG. 6), if the random number r_ois received, then the random initial vector y_o=F_K(r_o) is computed with block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b>. Hence, if any plaintext block x_iis accompanied by its index i and is received before the other plaintext blocks, then the corresponding unpredictable element E_i=y_o×i and the output block F_K(x_j+(yo x i)) is computed immediately with block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b>. After all of the n input plaintext blocks are received and their enciphered blocks are computed, the output block corresponding to the secret random vector is computed, namely F_K(x_n+1+(y_o×(n+1))) with block cipher F_K<b>41</b> using the first key K <b>31</b>, and all the enciphered blocks are combined (viz., FIG. 5) to form the computed tag w. Then, the computed tag w is compared for equality with the verification tag w′ (viz., FIG. 6).

[0164] It is readily understood by those skilled in the art that the out-of-order processing of tag verification applies to all other embodiments of this invention, not just to the stateless authentication scheme using two secret keys K and K′ (described in FIGS. 5 and 6).

[0165] It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that all of the specific embodiments disclosed above may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other techniques and routines for carrying out the same purposes and spirit of the present invention as set forth in the claims.

[0166] The foregoing description of a preferred embodiment of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of the invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined the claims appended hereto, and their equivalents.