Cooling water.
Abstract
The invention relates to environmentally friendly methods of reducing and/or preventing fouling on a surface of a component that is in contact with water. The invention further relates to a cooling system that is suited for employing the methods of the invention, and to a power plant, comprising such cooling system.

Term
No projected expiry on record.
- Priority and filed
- Granted
- Today
15 claims: 9 independent, 6 dependent
- 1Conclusies Conclusions 1. A method for reducing and / or preventing fouling on a surface of a component in contact with water, the method comprising adding carbon dioxide to the water to lower the pH to a maximum of 7.5, the water not is under pressure. 1. Werkwijze voor het verminderen en / of voorkomen van fouling op een oppervlak van een component dat in contact is met water, waarbij de werkwijze omvat het toevoegen van kooldioxide aan het water om de pH te verlagen tot ten hoogste 7,5, waarbij het water niet onder druk staat.
- 4A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the water is used for cooling an industrial installation, for example a power plant. 4. Werkwijze volgens een der voorgaande conclusies, waarbij het water gebruikt wordt voor het koelen van een industriële installatie, bijvoorbeeld een elektriciteitscentrale.
- 5A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the carbon dioxide is produced by an industrial plant cooled with water. 5. Werkwijze volgens een der voorgaande conclusies, waarbij het kooldioxide wordt geproduceerd door een industriële installatie die wordt gekoeld met water.
- 7The method of any preceding claim, wherein the carbon dioxide is filtered prior to adding the carbon dioxide to the water. 7. Werkwijze volgens een der voorgaande conclusies, waarbij het kooldioxide wordt gefiltreerd voorafgaand aan het toevoegen van de kooldioxide aan het water.
- 8Cooling system comprising means for adding carbon dioxide to cooling water to bring the cooling water to a pH of at most 7.5, whereby the cooling water is not pressurized. 8. Koelsysteem omvattende middelen voor het toevoegen van kooldioxide aan koelwater om het koelwater op een pH van ten hoogste 7.5 te brengen, waarbij het koelwater niet onder druk gezet wordt.
- 15Industrial installation, comprising a cooling system according to any one of claims 8-14. 15. Industriële installatie, omvattende een koelsysteem volgens een der conclusies 8-14. 1/3 1/3 Figure 1 Figure 1 ........ Control ........ Control ..... 3 ml C02/min ..... 3 ml CO2 / min ...... 15mlCO2 / min - 75 ml CO2 / min ...... 15mlCO2/min — 75 ml C02/min 2/3 2/3 Figure 2 Figure 2 Juvenile bivalves per sample (700 cm ) Juvenile bivalves per sample (700 cm) 3/3 3/3 Figure 3 Figure 3 COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) SAMENWERKINGSVERDRAG (PCT) RAPPORT BETREFFENDE NIEUWHEIDSONDERZOEK VAN INTERNATIONAAL TYPE REPORT ON NEWNESS RESEARCH OF INTERNATIONAL TYPE Form PCT / ISA 201 A (11/2000) Form PCT/ISA 201 A (11/2000) ONDERZOEKSRAPPORT BETREFFENDE HET RESEARCH REPORT ON THE RESULT OF THE STUDY INQUIRY RESULTAAT VAN HET ONDERZOEK NAAR DE STAND OF THE TECHNOLOGY OF THE INTERNATIONAL TYPE VAN DE TECHNIEK VAN HET INTERNATIONALE TYPE Number of the request for prior art studies Nummer van het verzoek om een onderzoek naar de stand van de techniek A. CLASSIFICATIE VAN HET ONDERWERP A. CLASSIFICATION OF THE TOPIC INV. CO2F1 / 66 INV. CO2F1/66 ADD. C02F103 / 02 ADD. C02F103/02 According to the International Classification of Patents (I PC) or both according to the national classification and the IPC. Volgens de Internationale Classificatie van octrooien (IPC) of zowel volgens de nationale classificatie als volgens de IPC. B. AREAS OF TECHNIQUE EXAMINED ____________________________________________ B. ONDERZOCHTE GEBIEDEN VAN DE TECHNIEK____________________________________________ Onderzochte miminum documentatie (classificatie gevolgd door classificatiesymbolen) Researched minimum documentation (classification followed by classification symbols) C02F CO2F Examined documentation other than the minimum documentation for such documents, insofar as such documents are included in the areas examined Onderzochte andere documentatie dan de mimimum documentatie, voor dergelijke documenten, voor zover dergelijke documenten in de onderzochte gebieden zijn opgenomen Electronic databases consulted during the investigation (name of databases and, where practicable, keywords used) Tijdens het onderzoek geraadpleegde elektronische gegevensbestanden (naam van de gegevensbestanden en, waar uitvoerbaar, gebruikte trefwoorden) EPO-Internal EPO-Internal Further documents are listed in the continuation of box C. Verdere documenten worden vermeld in het vervolg van vak C. 0 Sp ecial categories of cited documents' A 'literature not belonging to category X or Y describing the prior art' D * mentioned in the patent application 0 Speciale categorieën van aangehaalde documenten 'A' niet tot de categorie X of Y behorende literatuur die de stand van de techniek beschrijft 'D* in de octrooiaanvrage vermeld Patent previous patent application), published on or after the filing date, describing the same invention 'L * literature cited for other reasons Έ eerdere octrooiaanvrage), gepubliceerd op of na de indieningsdatum, waarin dezelfde uitvinding wordt beschreven 'L* om andere redenen vermelde literatuur O ”non-written prior art * P * between the priority date and the filing date published literature O” niet-schriftelijke stand van de techniek *P* tussen de voorrangsdatum en de indieningsdatum gepubliceerde literatuur Date on which the examination of the state of the art of international type was completed Datum waarop het onderzoek naar de stand van de techniek van internationaal type werd voltooid Leden van dezelfde octrooifamilie zijn vermeld in een bijlage *T* na de indieningsdatum of de voorrangsdatum gepubliceerde literatuur die niet bezwarend is voor de octrooiaanvrage, maar wordt vermeld ter verheldering van de theorie of het principe dat ten grondslag ligt aan de uitvinding *X* de conclusie wordt als niet nieuw of niet inventief beschouwd ten opzichte van deze literatuur Members of the same patent family are listed in an appendix * T * after the filing date or priority date published literature that does not adversely affect the patent application, but is disclosed to clarify the theory or principle underlying the invention * X * de conclusion is not considered new or inventive with respect to this literature Y de conclusie wordt als niet inventief beschouwd ten opzichte van de oombinatie van deze literatuur met andere geciteerde literatuur van dezelfde categorie, waarbij de combinatie voor de vakman voor de hand liggend wordt geacht *&* lid van dezelfde octrooifamilie of overeenkomstige octrooipublicatie Y the conclusion is considered not inventive with respect to the combination of this literature with other cited literature of the same category, the combination being considered obvious to those skilled in the art * & * member of the same patent family or corresponding patent publication Date of dispatch of the report of the state of the art research of international type Verzenddatum van het rapport van het onderzoek naar de stand van de techniek van internationaal type 26 August 2013 26 augustus 2013 Naam en adres van de instantie Name and address of the agency European Patent Office, P.B. 5818 Patentlaan 2 NL - 2280 HV Rijswijk Tel. (+31-70) 340-2040, European Patent Office, PB 5818 Patentlaan 2 NL - 2280 HV Rijswijk Tel. (+ 31-70) 340-2040, Fax:(+ 31-70) 340-3016 Fax: (+31-70) 340-3016 De bevoegde ambtenaar The competent official Van Iddekinge, R Van Iddekinge, R Form PCT / ISA / 201 (second page) (January 2004) page 1 of 2 Formulier PCT/ISA/201 (tweede blad) (Januari 2004) bladzijde 1 van 2 ONDERZOEKSRAPPORT BETREFFENDE HET RESEARCH REPORT ON THE RESULT OF THE STUDY INQUIRY RESULTAAT VAN HET ONDERZOEK NAAR DE STAND OF THE TECHNOLOGY OF THE INTERNATIONAL TYPE VAN DE TECHNIEK VAN HET INTERNATIONALE TYPE Number of the request for prior art studies Nummer van het verzoek om een onderzoek naar de stand van de techniek Form PCT / ISA / 201 (continuation second page) (January 2004) page 2 of 2 Formulier PCT/ISA/201 (vervolg tweede blad) (Januari 2004) bladzijde 2 van 2 ONDERZOEKSRAPPORT BETREFFENDE HET RESEARCH REPORT ON THE RESULT OF THE STUDY INQUIRY RESULTAAT VAN HET ONDERZOEK NAAR DE STAND OF THE TECHNOLOGY OF THE INTERNATIONAL TYPE VAN DE TECHNIEK VAN HET INTERNATIONALE TYPE Informatie over leden van dezelfde octrooifamilie Information about members of the same patent family Number of the request for prior art research Nummer van het verzoek om een onderzoeknaar de stand van de techniek Form PCT / ISA / 201 (patent family continuation sheet) (January 2004) Formulier PCT/ISA/201 (vervolgblad octrooifamilie) (Januari 2004) WRITTEN OPINION WRITTEN OPINION NETHERLANDS PATENT CENTER OCTROOICENTRUM NEDERLAND This opinion contains indications relating to the following items: This opinion contains indications relating to the following items: Form NL237A (Cover sheet) (July 2006) Form NL237A (Dekblad) (July 2006) Application number Application number WRITTEN OPINION WRITTEN OPINION Box No. I Basis of this opinion Box No. I Basis of this opinion 1. This opinion has been established on the basis of the latest set of claims filed before the start of the search. 1. This opinion has been established on the basis of the latest set of claims filed before the start of the search. 2. With regard to any nucleotide and / or amino acid sequence disclosed in the application and necessary to the claimed invention, this opinion has been established on the basis of: 2. With regard to any nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence disclosed in the application and necessary to the claimed invention, this opinion has been established on the basis of: a. type of material: a. type of material: □ a sequence listing □ table (s) related to the sequence listing □ a sequence listing □ table(s) related to the sequence listing b. format of material: b. format of material: On paper in electronic form □ on paper □ in electronic form c. time of filingyfurnishing: c. time of filingyfurnishing: Contained in the application as filed. □ contained in the application as filed. □ filed together with the application in electronic form. □ filed together with the application in electronic form. Furnished subsequently for the purposes of search. □ furnished subsequently for the purposes of search. 3. □ In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy of a sequence listing and / or table relating thereto has been filed or furnished, the required statements that the information in the subsequent or additional copies is identical to that in the application as filed or does not go beyond the application as filed, as appropriate, were furnished. 3. □ In addition, in the case that more than one version or copy of a sequence listing and/or table relating thereto has been filed or furnished, the required statements that the information in the subsequent or additional copies is identical to that in the application as filed or does not go beyond the application as filed, as appropriate, were furnished. 4. Additional comments: 4. Additional comments: Box No. V Reasoned statement with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;citations and explanations supporting such statement Box No. V Reasoned statement with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;citations and explanations supporting such statement 1. Statement 1. Statement 2. Citations and explanations see separate sheet 2. Citations and explanations see separate sheet NL237B (July 2006) NL237B (July 2006) WRITTEN OPINION Application number (SEPARATE SHEET) ______________________________________ NL2010885 WRITTEN OPINION Application number (SEPARATE SHEET)______________________________________NL2010885 Re Item V Re Item V Reasoned statement with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;citations and explanations supporting such statement Reasoned statement with regard to novelty, inventive step or industrial applicability;citations and explanations supporting such statement Reference is made to the following documents: Reference is made to the following documents: D1 FR 2 801 300 A1 (CARBOXYQUE FRANCAISE [FR]) 25 mei2001 D1 FR 2 801 300 A1 (CARBOXYQUE FRANCAISE [FR]) May 25, 2001 D2 FR2 832 143A1 (JEVANOFF ANDRE [FR]) 16 mei 2003 D2 FR2 832 143A1 (JEVANOFF ANDRE [FR]) May 16, 2003 D3 US 4 547 294 A (GOELDNER RICHARD W [US]) 15 oktober1985 D3 US 4 547 294 A (GOELDNER RICHARD W [US]) October 15, 1985 D4 EP 0 451 434 A1 (DENAC NV [BE]) 16 oktober 1991 D4 EP 0 451 434 A1 (DENAC NV [BE]) October 16, 1991 D5 JP H07 109585 A (KURITA WATER IND LTD;SUMITOMO METAL IND) D5 JP H07 109585 A (KURITA WATER IND LTD;SUMITOMO METAL IND) 25 April 1995 25 april 1995 D6 US 5 424 032 A (CHRISTENSEN RONALD J [US] ET AL) 13 juni1995 D6 US 5 424 032 A (CHRISTENSEN RONALD J [US] ET AL) June 13, 1995 D7 US 5 591 349 A (IKEDA AKIRA [JP] ET AL) 7 januari 1997 D7 US 5 591 349 A (IKEDA AKIRA [JP] ET AL) January 7, 1997 D8 US 2010/032030 A1 (PETERSON ROBERT RAYMOND [US]) 11 februari D8 US 2010/032030 A1 (PETERSON ROBERT RAYMOND [US]) February 11 2010 2010 D9 US 6 821 442 B1 (WATTEN BARNABY JUDE [US]) 23 november 2004 in de aanvraag genoemd D9 US 6 821 442 B1 (WATTEN BARNABY JUDE [US]) November 23, 2004 mentioned in the application The present application does not meet the criteria of patentability, because the subject-matter of the independent claims 1,8 and 15 is not new and because the subject-matter of claims 1-15 does not involve an inventive step .. The present application does not meet the criteria of patentability, because the subject-matter of the independent claims 1,8 and 15 is not new and because the subject-matter of claims 1-15 does not involve an inventive step.. Each of documents D1-D7 disclose a method according to claim 1 of the application, see parts of these documents cited in the search report. Each of documents D1-D7 disclose a method according to claim 1 of the application, see parts of these documents cited in the search report. Each of documents D1-D6 disclose a cooling system according to claim 7 of the application, see parts of these documents cited in the search report. Each of documents D1-D6 disclose a cooling system according to claim 7 of the application, see parts of these documents cited in the search report. Each of documents D1-D6 disclose an industrial installation according to claim 15 of the application, see parts of these documents cited in the search report. Each of documents D1-D6 disclose an industrial installation according to claim 15 of the application, see parts of these documents cited in the search report. Dependent claims 2-7,9-14 do not contain any features which, in combination with the features of any claim to which they refer, meet the requirements of novelty and/or inventive step, see parts of documents D1-D9 cited in the search report. Dependent claims 2-7.9-14 do not contain any features which, in combination with the features of any claim to which they refer, meet the requirements of novelty and / or inventive step, see parts of documents D1-D9 cited in the search report. Form NL237-3 (separate sheet) (July 2006) (sheet 1) Form NL237-3 (separate sheet) (July 2006) (sheet 1)
Independent claims9
56 paragraphs in 1 section, as filed
© Patent holder (s):
Wageningen Agricultural Research Foundation.
* 72) Inventor (s):
Edwin Matheus Foekema in Schagen.
© Patent issued:
10.12.2014 © Authorized representative:
ir. CM Jansen et al. in The Hague.
© COOIing water.
© The invention relates to environmentally friendly methods of reducing and / or preventing fouling on a surface of a component that is in contact with water. The invention further relates to a cooling system that is suited for employing the methods of the invention, and to a power plant, comprising such cooling system.
LC 2010885
This patent has been granted regardless of the enclosed result of the prior art research and written opinion. The patent corresponds to the documents originally filed.
Title: COOling water
Field: The invention relates to methods and means of reducing and / or preventing fouling on a surface of a component that is in contact with water.
Introduction
Thermoelectric power plants boil water to create steam, which then spins turbines to generate electricity. The heat used to produce steam can come from burning of a fuel, from nuclear reactions, or directly from the sun or geothermal heat sources underground. Once steam has passed through a turbine, it must be cooled before it can be reused to produce more electricity. This cooling of the primary water circuit is generally achieved by a separate cooling water system that consists of a condenser, a cooling tower, and a cooling water pump. The cooling water is either extracted from a nearby water source and discharged back into this source, or cooled down and recirculated for reuse as cooling water after cooling of the primary water circuit.
A first cooling system is also termed a once-through system. Such system takes water from a nearby source (eg, river, lake, or ocean), circulates it through pipes to absorb heat from the steam in systems called condensers, and discharges the now warmer water to the local source. Once-through systems were initially the most popular because of their simplicity, low cost, and the possibility of situating power plants in places with abundant supplies of cooling water.
A second cooling system is a closed-loop system, also termed a wet-recirculating system. Such system reuses cooling water in a second cycle rather than immediately discharging it back to the original water source. Most commonly, wet-recirculating systems use cooling towers to expose water to ambient air. Some of the water evaporates; the rest is then returned to the condenser in the power plant. Because wet-recirculating systems only withdraw water to replace any water that is lost through evaporation in the cooling tower, these systems have much lower water withdrawals than once-through systems.
Fouling of a water system, for example a cooling water system, is a major problem for the industry, for example for power plants. Methods for reducing fouling include the addition of a biocide such as, for example, chlorine to the water. However, chlorination is associated with high costs and environmental concerns due to the generation of chloromethanes and other organochlorines as by-products. Most countries, including European countries, have introduced measures to reduce the discharge of organochlorines into the aquatic environment. Because of these measures, alternative chemical products, such as peracetic acid, are replacing chlorine. However, there is still a need for a more environmentally-friendly and cheap agent that prevents fouling on the surface of a water system.
Therefore, the invention provides a method of reducing and / or preventing fouling on a surface of a component that is in contact with water, the method comprising: transferring carbon dioxide to the water to bring the water at a pH of at most 7.5, which the water is not pressurized. Said water preferably is fresh water, for example fresh cooling water that is used in a power plant.
The term “fresh water” includes surface water such as sea water, brackish water, river water, lake water, and ground water. Said water preferably is salt water, preferably seawater.
Fouling is the accumulation of unwanted material on solid surfaces to the detriment of function. Fouling is distinguished from other surface-growth phenomena in that it occurs on a surface of a component, system or plant performing a defined and useful function, and that the fouling process impedes or interferes with this function. The fouling material can consist of either living organms (biofouling) or non-living substances including, for example, scaling.
Biofouling is the accumulation of micro-organisms (eg algae and diatoms), plants, and animals on surfaces. Bacteria can form biofilms or slime layers. The organisms aggregate on surfaces using colloidal hydrogels of water and extracellular polymeric substances such as polysaccharides, lipids, and nucleic acids. Amongst the larger animals that cause widespread fouling are zebra mussel in freshwater, and blue mussel and oyster in seawater.
Scaling, or precipitation fouling, is the undesirable accumulation of solid salts, oxides and hydroxides from water. These include, for example, calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate. Scale deposits are formed by precipitation and crystal growth at a surface in contact with water. The most common scale-forming salts that deposit on heat transfer surfaces are those that exhibit retrograde solubility with temperature. Although they may be completely soluble in the lowertemperature bulk water, these compounds (eg, calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, and magnesium silicate) supersaturate in the higher-temperature water adjacent to the heat transfer surface and precipitate on the surface. Metallic surfaces are ideal sites for crystal nucleation because of their rough surfaces and the low velocities adjacent to the surface. Corrosion cells on the metal surface produce areas of high pH, which promote the precipitation of many cooling water salts. Once formed, scale deposits initiate additional nucleation, and crystal growth proceeds at an accelerated rate.
The addition of carbon dioxide to water to prevent biofouling is known from United States Patent 6,821,442. As described herein, carbon dioxide is transferred to water to supersaturate the water with dissolved carbon dioxide such that aquatic species are killed. For this supersaturation, the water is contained within a closed system and pressurized such that delta P is greater than 0.0 mm Hg. Delta P is calculated as:
Delta P = pN2 + pC> 2 + PH2O + pCO2 - pAtm, thereby pN2 includes argon and other trace atmospheric gasses.
It is noted in US6,821,442 that supersaturation of water with carbon dioxide would induce gas bubble trauma (GBT), which may result in the killing of aquatic species.
The present inventor now established that the transfer of carbon dioxide to water at a level such that delta P is below atmospheric pressure prevents growth of young shellfish, prevents scaling and results in distraction of fish. Surprisingly, the inventor established that transfer of carbon dioxide to a level such that the pH of the water is at most 7.5, is sufficient for prevention, or at least for reduction, of fouling on a surface of a component that is in contact with said water. The transfer of carbon dioxide to water at a level such that the pH of the water is at most 7.5, provides an environmentally-friendly and cheap agent to prevent fouling on the surface of a cooling water system. Carbon dioxide is a natural gas essential for life. Within the limits that are sufficient to reduce fouling, the elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and consistently reduced pH levels will not result in acute killing of aquatic species, but will rather reduce propagation and reproduction.
Said carbon dioxide is preferably transferred at an intake point of the water. Said water preferably is fresh water, including surface water such as sea water, river water and lake water, and ground water. Said fresh water preferably is salt water, preferably seawater.
The pH of the water is preferably reduced to a pH of between 6.0 and 7.5, such as to a pH of 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.95, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 , 7.3 7.4 or 7.5. The pH is preferably not below 6, more preferably not below 6.5 in order not to cause damage to the water system such as corrosion of metal components. The pH of the water is therefore preferably between 6.5 and 7.5, such as 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.95, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4 or 7.5.
Sea water has, on average, a pH of about 8.5. To reduce the pH of sea water to a level of about 7.5, about 10 mgram of CO2 is required per liter of water. To reduce the pH of sea water to a level of about 6.0, about 150 mgram of CO2 is required per liter of water. Hence, the amount of CO2 that is required per liter of water to adjust the pH of the water to a value of between 6.0 and 7.5 is between and 150 mgram. This amount of CO2 can be transferred to water using methods and means that are known in the art.
A pH of at most 7.5 will increase carbonate solubility and in this way effectively prevent shell fish such as cockles, mussels, and oysters, and other mollusc larvae from forming the shells necessary to settle and survive in the water system. In addition, the increased carbonate solubility of the water results in decreased scaling, while the increased carbon dioxide concentration results in deterrence of fish.
To reduce the pH of the cooling water of a plant that consumes about 213,120 m<sup>3</sup>/ hr of cooling water to a pH of about 7 requires the addition of about 2771 kg / hr of CO2. To reduce the pH of the cooling water of a plant that consumes about 213,120 m<sup>3</sup>/ hr of cooling water to a pH of about 6 requires the addition of about 29411 kg / hr of CO2. An example of such plant is the Amer power plant in Geertruidenberg, the Netherlands, which has a capacity of about 1245 megawatts. It is further preferred that the carbon dioxide that is transferred to the water to bring the water at a pH of at most 7.5, is produced by the industrial plant that is cooled with the water. An average power plant, for example a NUON multifuel power plant in the Netherlands, produces about 571429 kg of CO2 per hour. The amount of CO2 that is transferred to the water to adjust the pH to a level between 6 and 7.5, more preferred to a level between 6.5 and 7.5, is between about 5% and 10% of the total CO2 emission of the plant.
The carbon dioxide is optionally treated, for example filtered, prior to transferring the carbon dioxide to the water to reduce or eliminate toxic substances. The carbon dioxide that is included in the exhaust gas from a plant, for example a power plant, may contain toxic substances such as fine particulate matter and metals, for example lead and arsenic. Methods, for example filtration technologies, that are used to remove these toxic substances are known in the art and include scrubbers, such as wet and dry scrubbers.
The invention further provides a cooling system comprising means for transferring carbon dioxide to the cooling water to bring the cooling water at a pH of at most 7.5, wherein the cooling water is not pressurized. Said cooling system is preferably for cooling of an industrial plant, for example a power plant, or other industrial plant such as, for example, a chemical plant including a petroleum refinery and a blast furnace.
Said means for transferring carbon dioxide to the water, preferably cooling water, include means for transferring exhaust gas from a plant, preferably filtered exhaust gas, through the water, for example by an exhaust gas discharging chamber for discharging gas in the form of gas bubbles into said water. Said exhaust gas discharging chamber preferably comprises a porous membrane whereby gas absorption rate is enhanced by a bubble dispersion mechanism.
The cooling water may be recycled through a recirculating system or used in a single pass once-through cooling system. In one embodiment, a preferred cooling system according to the invention is a once-through cooling system. The main advantages of a once-through system is that it is a simple type of system and very flexible.
In another embodiment, a preferred cooling system according to the invention is a recirculating system. Recirculating systems may be open if they rely upon cooling towers or cooling ponds to remove heat. If heat removal is accomplished with negligible evaporative loss of cooling water, the recirculating system may be closed. A preferred cooling system, for example for an energy plant is an open recirculating cooling system. Open recirculating cooling systems save a tremendous amount of fresh water compared to the alternative method, oncethrough cooling. The quantity of water discharged to waste is greatly reduced in the open recirculating method, and chemical treatment is more economical. However, cooling by evaporation increases the dissolved solids concentration in the water, raising corrosion and deposition tendencies. In addition, the relatively higher temperatures significantly increase corrosion potential and increase the tendency for biological growth. The transfer of carbon dioxide to the cooling water of an open recirculating cooling system to bring the water at a pH of at most 7.5, preferably at a pH of between 6.5 and 7.5, while the water is not pressurized, provides a very economical method of reducing or preventing both scaling and biological growth.
In a preferred cooling system according to the invention, the cooling water is cooled prior to discharging the cooling water back into its source, or prior to its reuse as cooling water. Cooling of the used cooling water is accomplished, for example by a cooling tower. A cooling tower is designed to provide intimate air / water contact. Heat rejection is primarily by evaporation of part of the cooling water. Some sensible heat loss (direct cooling of the water by the air) also occurs, but it is only a minor portion of the total heat rejection. Said cooling tower preferably is a natural or mechanical draft tower and the direction of airflow, relative to the water flow is either counterflow or crossflow. A cooling tower may further aid in reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the cooling water, prior to discharging the cooling water, for example back into its source.
The invention further provides an industrial plant, for instance a power plant, and / or a chemical plant including a petroleum refinery and a blast furnace, comprising a cooling system according to the invention. Said plant comprises means for transferring carbon dioxide to the cooling water to bring the cooling water at a pH of at most 7.5, preferably at a pH between 6.5 and 7.5, wherein the cooling water is not pressurized.
Figure legends
Figure 1 pH in the water columns of the experimental ecosystems. CO2 was applied from 5 day 0 onwards.
Figure 2: Number of juvenile bivalves (Cerastoderma edule) in sediment samples at the end of the study 69 days after the start of the CO2 application.
Figure 3: Biomass (measured as chlorophyll-a fluorescence, by means of a Biotek microtiter plate reader with Gen5 software) of algae settled on substrates at the end of the study 69 days after the start of the CO2 application. Series A and B depict substrates at two different positions in the experimental ecosystem.
Examples
Example 1
Experiments were performed wherein experimental marine ecosystems were exposed to a series of elevated CCUconcentrations. The experiments were conducted in outdoor tanks with a total volume of about 5 m<sup>3</sup> containing natural seawater and sediment inhabited by a community of planktonic, meiio- and macrofaunal organisms.
CO2 was continuously added to the water column starting on day 0 in three fluxes so that that pH levels of the water column stabilized around 8.0, 7.5 and 6.8 respectively (Figure 1), corresponding to CO2 pressure of 0.8, 2.6 and 16 matm respectively ( Table 1). In unexposed control conditions, pH was 8.3 and CO2 pressure 0.4 m-atm.
Table 1 CO2 fluxes to the test systems and the related CO2 pressure and pH in the water column.
<td>CO2 flux (ml / min)</td><td>CO2 pressure (m-atm)</td><td>pH (average)</td>
<td> 0</td><td> 0.4</td><td> 8.3</td>
<td> 3</td><td> 0.8</td><td> 8.0</td>
<td> 15</td><td> 2.6</td><td> 7.5</td>
<td> 75</td><td> 16</td><td> 6.8</td>
Bivalve molluscs and algae are important groups of fouling organisms. Figure 2 depicts the impact of increased CO2 levels on reproduction of mollusks. As representative of bivalve molluscs, the cockle Cerastoderma edule was included in the experimental ecosystems. Although it was clear that shells became less robust at higher CO2 levels, the adults survived all treatments. Reproductive success, however, was strongly affected. At 2.6 m-atm CO2 and higher, reproduction was almost completely inhibited (Figure 2). The poor condition of the adult shells indicates erosion of the shell carbonates. The adults can withstand this situation as long as the shell maintains its protective function. It is likely that under these conditions it is not possible for mollusc larvae to develop the shell that is essential for further development and survival. The impact of the elevated CO2 for fouling prevention concerning the reproductions of bivalve molluscs and the sessile algae is clear at different endpoints.
The impact of increased CO2 levels on sessile algae is depicted in Figure 3. Roughly speaking algae can appear planktonic, suspended in the water column, or sessile, on sediments and substrates. By definition, only the sessile algae are concerned for fouling. Although CO2 serves as a fertilizer for planktonic algae, our study revealed an opposite effect on sessile algae (Figure 3). The dataset shows a 50% reduction of the algal biomass at 2.6 m-atm CO2 and over 90% reduction at 16 m-atm CO2. The mechanism behind this is not understood yet, but the experimental set-up excludes competition with planktonic algae as the cause.
Conclusion
These results indicate that a CO2 pressure of 1.6 m-atm (resulting in this seawater in a pH of 6.8) is sufficient to prevent the settlement of cockle larvae and to reduce development of sessile algae with 90%. This makes that CO2 has the potential to be used to prevent fouling of marine organisms. Although sensitivity of other species still has to be tested, it is likely that similar results will be found with fresh water species.
13 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6 Sheet 7 Sheet 8 Sheet 9 Sheet 10 Sheet 11 Sheet 12 Sheet 13
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Category | Cited during | Relevant claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0451434A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | XY | Search report | 1,8,15 |
| US2010032030A1 | Cites | United States of America | Y | Search report | 1-15 |
| FR2801300A1 | Cites | France | XY | Search report | 1,8,15 |
| FR2832143A1 | Cites | France | X | Search report | 1 |
| US4547294A | Cites | United States of America | XY | Search report | 1,8,15 |
| US5424032A | Cites | United States of America | XY | Search report | 1,8,15 |
| US5591349A | Cites | United States of America | X | Search report | 1 |
| US6821442B1 | Cites | United States of America | XDY | Search report | 1,8,15 |
| JPH07109585A | Cites | Japan | XY | Search report | 1,8,15 |
3 members in 3 offices
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010885 | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | A | |
| NL20132010885 | – | – | – |
Members3
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL2010885C2This record | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | C2 | |
| WO2014193230A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| EP3003990A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 |
2 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual feeLapsedMM | MM | |
| Change of name(s) of proprietor(s)HC | HC |
Numbers
- Publication
- 2010885
- Publication, DOCDB
- 2010885
- Publication, EPODOC
- NL2010885C
- Application
- 2010885
- Application, DOCDB
- 2010885
- Application, EPODOC
- NL20132010885
Titles
- English
- COOLING WATER.
Classification
- CPC, 4
- C02F1/66
- C02F2103/023
- C02F2103/08
- C02F2303/20
- IPC, 1
- C02F1 66