Nova Patents
IL243726A

Phosphorus containing flame retardants

Abstract

This record has no abstract on file.

IL243726A, drawing sheet 1
Sheet 1 of 17

Term

No projected expiry on record.

  1. Priority
  2. Filed
  3. Published
  4. Today

20 claims: 2 independent, 18 dependent

  1. 1
    To a solution of 96.0 g methylphosphonic acid (1.00 mol) in 210 mL deionized water is slowly added 54.1 g aluminum ethoxide (0.334 mol) under nitrogen. The reaction mixture is then stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solution is subsequently concentrated and dried at 100 °C in vacuo to afford a clear, colorless solid. Thermal analysis, as shown in Figure 1,, indicated the loss of one mole of water starting at approximately 250 °C. Elemental analysis:29.8% P, 9.0% Al;calc'd 29.8% P, 8.7% Al. 20 parts of the salt and 30 parts glass were compounded into 50 parts polyamide 66 using a Haake Rheocord 90 equipped with a three piece Brabender measuring head. A decrease in torque was observed during compounding, which could signify polymer degradation, resulting in a material resembling wet newspaper that was friable upon cooling and dusty after grinding. Analysis of the compounded material, which could not be molded, by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) provided additional evidence of degradation. Example 1 - Flame Retardant from methylphosphonic acid aluminum salt, FR-INV1 To a cooled solution of 48.0 g methylphosphonic acid (500 mmol) in 210 ml deionized water is slowly added 27.0 g aluminum ethoxide (167 mmol) under nitrogen. The reaction is then allowed to warm to room temperature and is stirred for 16 h. The solution is subsequently concentrated and dried at 100 °C in vacuo to afford a clear, colorless solid. Thermal analysis as indicated the loss of one mole of water starting at 250 °C. The colorless solid was heated for 4h at 280°C resulting in an off-white solid that is stable to >400°C, as shown in Figure
  2. 2
    Elemental analysis:31.5% P, 9.0% Al. Comparative Example 2 To a stirred solution of 37.9 g ethylphosphonic acid (344 mmol) in 150 mL deionized water is added a solution of 27.7 g aluminum chloride hexahydrate (115 mmol) in 150 mL deionized water. The solution is then concentrated in vacuo to remove water and HCI. Drying at 130°C in a vacuum oven affords a white powder. Thermal analysis indicated the loss of one mole of water starting at approximately 200 °C. Elemental analysis: 25.0% P, 6.9% Al. 20 parts of the salt and 30 parts glass were compounded into 50 parts polyamide 66 using a Haake Rheocord 90. Low torque was observed throughout compounding, which could signify polymer degradation, with the formulation swelling out of the bowl towards the end of the run resulting in a material that foamed due to escaped gases and that was friable upon cooling and dusty after grinding. Analysis of the compounded material, which could not be molded, by GPC and DSC provided additional evidence of degradation. Example 2 - Flame Retardant from ethylphosphonic acid aluminum salt, FR-INV2: To a stirred solution of 149.5 g ethylphosphonic acid (1.36 mol) in 500 mL deionized water is added a solution of 109.3 g aluminum chloride hexahydrate (.453 mol) in 250 mL deionized water. The solution is then concentrated and dried at 130°C in vacuo to remove water and HCI. Thermal analysis indicated the loss of one mole of water starting at 180°C. Heating the dried salt for 3h at 225°C affords a white powder that is stable to approximately 400°C. Elemental analysis: 27.3%P, 7.6% Al. Example 3 - Flame Retardant from ethylphosphonic acid calcium salt, FR-INV3: To a stirred solution of 52.1 g ethylphosphonic acid (473 mmol) in 250 mL deionized water is slowly added 17.5 g calcium hydroxide (236 mmol). The solution is then concentrated and dried at 100 °C in vacuo. Thermal analysis indicated the loss of one mole of water staring at 220 °C. Heating the dried salt for 3h at 290°C affords a white powder that is stable >400°C. Elemental analysis: 25.3% P, 16.3% Ca. Formulations comprising flame retardants from Examples 1, 2 and 3 and various synergists were compounded into polyamide 66 with glass using a Haake Rheocord 90 and molded with a BabyPlast Mini-Molder into 1/16” bars which were subjected to standard UL 94 Vertical Burn Test. Formulations and results are listed in Table 1 below. Table 1 - FR Data Synergists used in the FR formulations: SYN1: Aluminum tris(diethylphosphinate), Exolit® OP 1230 SYN2: Methylene-diphenylphosphine oxide-substituted polyaryl ether SYN3: p-Xylylenebis(diphenylphosphine oxide) SYN4: 4,4’-bis(diphenylphosphinylmethyl)-1,r-biphenyl SYN5: 1,2-bis-(9,10-dihydro-9-oxy-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide)ethane SYN6: Melem, Delacal® NFR HP SYN7: Aluminum hydrogen phosphite ΑΙ 2 (ΗΡΟ 3 ) 3 SYN8: Dimelamine zinc pyrophosphate, Satire® 400 243,726/2 What is claimed: 1. A thermoplastic flame retardant polymer composition comprising: a) a thermoplastic polymer, b) from 1% to 50%, by weight based on the total weight of the thermoplastic flame retardant polymer composition, of a flame retardant material obtained by thermal conversion into a different material of one or more compounds of formula (I) into a more thermally stable material, as determined by differential scanning calorimetry or weight loss data obtained while increasing temperatures during thermal analysis, by a process comprising heating in the absence of other components at temperatures of higher than 200°C from 0.01 hour to 20 hours one or more than one compound of formula (I) M (+)y (i), wherein R is C1-12 alkyl, C 6 -io aryl, Ο 7 -ι 8 alkylaryl, or C 7 -18 arylalkyl, wherein said alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, or arylalkyl are unsubstituted or are substituted by halogen, hydroxyl, amino, Ci_ 4 alkylamino, di-Ci_ 4 alkylamino, Ci_ 4 alkoxy, carboxy or C 2 . 5 alkoxycarbonyl;M is a metal, y is a number of from 1 to 4 so that M ( +)y is a metal cation where (+)y represents the charge formally assigned to the cation, and p is a number of from 1 to 4. 2. The thermoplastic flame retardant polymer composition according to claim 1 wherein M in formula (I) is Li, K, Na, Mg, Ca, Ba, Zn, Zr, B, Al, Si, Ti, Sn or Sb.
  3. 20
    A process for increasing the flame resistance of a thermoplastic polymer comprising heating at temperatures of 200°C or higher one or more than one compound of formula (I) o OH M (+)y (I), wherein R is C1-12 alkyl, C 6 -io aryl, C7-18 alkylaryl, or C7-18 arylalkyl, wherein said alkyl, aryl, alkylaryl, or arylalkyl are unsubstituted or are substituted by halogen, hydroxyl, amino, C1.4 alkylamino, di-Ci.4alkylamino, C1.4alkoxy, carboxy or C 2 . 5 alkoxycarbonyl;M is a metal, y is a number of from 1 to 4 so that M ( +)y is a metal cation where (+)y represents the charge formally assigned to the cation, and p is a number of from 1 to 4;to convert the one or more than one compound of formula (I) into a different chemical species having greater thermal stability than the one or more compound of formula (I) as determined by differential scanning calorimetry or weight loss data obtained while increasing temperatures during thermal analysis to prepare a flame retardant material followed by incorporating the flame retardant material into a thermoplastic polymer resin by melt processing of the polymer and flame retardant at elevated temperature without negatively impacting the physical properties of the thermoplastic polymer, optionally with one or more additional flame retardant, synergist or flame retardant adjuvant. For the Applicant