Single-pulse coherent anti-stokes raman scattering microscopy and spectroscopy

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to Raman spectroscopy and microscopy, and in particular, to coherent anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy and microscopy.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In coherent nonlinear spectroscopy, the sample is probed by measuring processes of energy exchange between photons interacting with the sample. One of the most common nonlinear spectroscopy methods is coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (CARS), a coherent four-wave mixing process involving the generation of a coherent vibration in the probed medium. In CARS, three laser photons, a pump photon (<y_p) a probe photon (a>_pr) and the Stokes photon (a>_s), overlap in the medium under investigation. By nonlinear interaction with the molecules a fourth coherent photon (¾) with the anti-Stokes frequency = ω_ρ-co_s+ ω_ρι. is generated.

The CARS process can be visualized in a molecular energy level diagram as depicted in Fig. 1, where | i) and | g) are molecular rovibrational states, and |a) and | β ) are virtual levels. Resonant enhancement of the CARS process occurs when the frequency difference /¾ =ω_ρ - ω₅ coincides with a vibrational level of the medium.

The CARS process, as a coherent scattering process, has to fulfill a phase matching condition, which is equivalent to momentum conservation of the photons involved. With the wave vectors of the pump photon (A>), the probe photon (^_pr) and the Stokes photon (kfi, the wave vector of the Raman signal can be obtained by kAs=k_Pr+(kp-ks) °r k_P+ k_pr = k_AS+ k_s .

In general, there are two conventional different techniques utilizing a multibeam excitation scheme for measuring a CARS spectrum, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,077,719; 4,084,100; 4,405,237; and 4,512,660; and in WO 02/48660.

According to the first technique, the so-called scanning CARS, two narrow bandwidth lasers at c0p and at a>_s (having spectral width of the order of the typical linewidth of Raman levels, i.e., 1 cm) are tuned over the Raman resonances of the probed species to generate a signal at 2ω_ρ - to_s (in this case a>_pr = a>_s). The spectral resolution of this technique is mainly determined by the bandwidth of the applied laser sources.

According to the second technique, broadband or multiplex CARS, a broadband Stokes beam (spectral width typical 100 -1000cm) can be used to excite several Raman transitions under investigations simultaneously. The use of a narrow band probe and a broadband Stokes beam enables simultaneous measurement of the entire band of the Raman spectrum (see, for example, “Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy/ edited by B. Schrader, VCH, Weinheim, 1995). The spectral resolution of this technique is usually achieved by using a monochromator and a multichannel detection system. Thus, one laser shot is utilized to measure the entire CARS spectrum.

Another possibility to obtain multiplex CARS spectra is to use a timeresolved CARS scheme. In this technique, two relatively broadband exciting pulses are used for simultaneously populating several Raman levels. The spectral data is obtained by measuring the interference pattern of the CARS signal from a third, delayed broadband probe pulse (see, for example, an article of Leonhardt et al., published in Chem. Phys. Lett., 1987, V. 133, P. 373).

-.

Coherent Raman processes have become a valuable tool in the past few decades in femtosecond time-resolved spectroscopy, as well as in combustion studies and condensed-state spectroscopy. For example, Leonhardt et al. describes in Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, V. 133, P. 373 the measurements of the energy difference and the lifetimes of two (or more) Raman levels by Fourier-decomposing the quantum beats of the CARS signal using femtosecond pulses. This scheme has been recently used to analyze the energy-level diagram of complex molecules.

CARS has recently become a favorable technique for nonlinear depthresolved microscopy (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,108,081; WO 02/06778; and scientific articles Zumbusch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, V. 82, P. 4142; Hashimoto et al., Opt. Lett., 2000, V. 25, P. 1768; and Volkmer at al., Applied Phys. Lett., 2002, V. 80, P. 1505). CARS microscopy has the potential, for example, for studying live biological specimens while gathering threedimensional information on their molecular constitution. However, the these CARS microscopes also require two or three narrow-band sources that must be all tightly synchronized and also tunable within the Raman energy range.

It should be appreciated that the signal of CARS (being a result of a nonlinear process) is stronger with short intense pulses. However, the femtosecond CARS techniques suffer from two major difficulties. First, there is an־ increased strong background signal typically due to the electronic contributions to the thirdorder susceptibility, both from the sample and from the surrounding medium (i.e., solvent). The second difficulty is associated with a lack of selectivity between neighboring energy levels, due to the large bandwidth of the pulses.

These problems can be solved by coherent quantum control methods. The concept of coherent quantum control of a quantum system is based on the achievement of constructive interference between different quantum paths leading to a desirable outcome, while interfering destructively with paths leading to other outcomes. While schemes of coherent control may involve excitations by continuous waves, most available techniques are also known which involve ultrashort optical pulses. With the recent progress in ultrafast optics, it is now /2 possible to shape ultrashort signals with desired spectral shapes (see, for example,

U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,068 assigned to the assignee of the present application).

The inventors of the present invention have recently shown how coherent control techniques can be exploited to improve the CARS spectroscopy employing three femtosecond pulses related to the pump, Stokes and probe beams, respectively. Two approaches have been described for controlling the CARS process. According to the first approach (f Quantum Control of Coherent antiStokes Raman Processes ” by Oron et al., published in Phys. Rev. A, 2002, V. 65, P. 43408), a periodic phase modulation is used to control the population induced by broadband pulses. By shaping both the pump and the Stokes pulses with an appropriate spectral phase function, the nonresonant CARS background has been greatly reduced. This technique also allows for exciting just one out of many vibrational levels, even when all of them are within the spectral bandwidth of the excitation pulses. According to the second approach (“Narrow-Band Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Signals from Broad-Band Pulses ” by Oron et al., published in Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, V. 88, P. 63004), only the probe pulse is shaped, thereby enabling enhancement of the resolution of the measured CARS spectrum . The achieved spectral resolution becomes significantly better than the bandwidth of the readout pulse. In particular, by tailoring the phase of a 100 femtosecond probe pulse, a narrow-band CARS spectroscopy resonant signal has been obtained with a width of less than 15cm'¹, which is an order of magnitude narrower than the CARS signal from an unshaped, transform limited pulse (all frequency components having the same phase).

The inventors of the present invention have recently shown in the article ^,‘^,’Single-pulse coherently-controlled nonlinear Raman spectroscopy and microscopy” by Dudovich N. et al published in Nature, 2002, V. 418, PP. 512-514 that molecular vibrations have oscillation periods that reflect the molecular structure, and are hence being used as a spectroscopic fingerprint for detection and identification. A single-pulse vibrational spectroscopy was performed on several /3 molecules in the liquid phase, where both the excitation and the readout processes are performed by the same pulse.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Those portions of the specification outside the scope of the allowed claims do not form part of the claimed invention.

There is a need in the art to facilitate coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (CARS) spectroscopy and microscopy by providing a novel method and system for producing an exciting signal to induce a CARS process in a medium.

The main idea of the present invention consists of inducing a CARS process in a medium (i.e., providing a CARS spectrum of the medium) by exciting the medium with a single pulse carrying a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon. In other words, the technique of the present invention provides for supplying three interacting photons (the pump photon, Stokes photon and probe photon) by the same unitary excitation pulse. This enables the system operation with a single laser source generating a transform limited femtosecond pulse.

It should be understood that the term “transform limited pulse” used herein actually signifies a pulse resulted from phasing the modes of a compressible phase coherent pulse, and can therefore be termed also as a “spectral phase coherent” or “compressible to a transform limited” pulse.

The present invention provides various coherent-control techniques consisting of shaping the spectral phase coherent (transform limited) broadband pulse (carrying a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon) to produce a unitary optical excitation pulse enabling identification of a CARS signal induced by this pulse from any other optical signal.

The present invention provides for designing a single-pulse CARS spectrometer or microscope free of the two aforementioned difficulties, and for achieving high spectral resolutions and diminishing the detrimental effects of the nonresonant background.

The concept of the present invention for performing a nonlinear optical interaction with a matter in a single coherently controlled pulse offers a promising alternative to the conventional multi-beam nonlinear systems in use today.

/2

Thus, according to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for producing an output coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (CARS) signal of a medium, the method comprising: (i) producing a unitary optical excitation pulse that carries a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon; and (ii) inducing a CARS process in the medium by exciting the medium by the at least one unitary optical excitation pulse.

The unitary optical excitation pulse carrying the pump, Stokes and probe photons is produced by generating a spectral phase coherent optical pulse carrying the pump, Stokes and probe photons; and applying a predetermined shaping to the spectral phase coherent optical pulse.

The shaping of the spectral phase coherent optical pulse may comprise blocking wavelengths shorter than a wavelength in said pulse. This wavelength is defined by a spectral bandwidth in which the output CARS signal is likely to occur.

The shaping of the spectral phase coherent (transform limited) optical pulse may comprise assigning a desired phase to each wavelength component of the transform limited optical pulse. The assigning of the desired phase is preferably carried out is addition to the blocking of wavelengths shorter than the wavelength. The assigning of the desired phase preferably includes modulating a spectral phase of the transform limited optical pulse by using a desired spectral phase function. The desired spectral phase function may be a periodic function, or may be formed by at least one phase gate having a bandwidth narrower than the bandwidth of the unitary excitation pulse to be produced. The phase gate may for example be a π phase gate, e.g., with the bandwidth in the range of 0.5nm to 3nm. The π phase gate is preferably spectrally located at of a short wavelength end of the excitation pulse to be produced.

The above shaping can be implemented by passing the spectral phase coherent pulse through a Spatial Light Modulator (SLM).

Alternatively or additionally to the phase modulation, the shaping may comprise application of polarization control to the spectral phase coherent pulse consisting of 90 degree polarization rotation of predetermined wavelengths of the /2 pulse. This results in that the input spectral phase coherent pulse is split into a broadband pump component and a narrow-band probe component having orthogonal polarizations.

According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (CARS) spectroscopy of a medium constituted of molecules capable of producing an output CARS signal, comprising:

(a) producing at least one unitary optical excitation pulse that carries a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon;

(b) focusing said at least one unitary optical excitation pulse onto the medium, thereby exciting the medium to produce the output CARS signal of the molecules; and (c) measuring said output CARS signal.

According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy of a target material constituted of molecules producing an output CARS signal, the method comprising:

producing at least one unitary optical excitation pulse that carries a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon;

focusing said at least one unitary optical excitation pulse onto the medium, thereby exciting the medium to produce the output CARS signal of the molecules;

providing a relative displacement between the medium and the exciting beam to thereby enable scanning of the medium by the unitary excitation pulse beam.

Hie invention according to its yet another aspect provides a system for use in measuring an output coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (CARS) signal of a medium, the system comprising a single laser operable to generate at least one spectral phase coherent optical pulse carrying a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon, and a programmable pulse shaper for receiving the spectral phase coherent optical pulse and shaping it to produce a unitary optical excitation pulse.

There has thus been outlined, rather broadly, the more important features of the invention in order that the detailed description thereof that follows hereinafter may be better understood. Additional details and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description, and in part will be appreciated from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, preferred embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

Fig. 1 is an energy level diagram of the typical CARS process;

Fig. 2A illustrates a schematic view of a single-pulse CARS spectrometer system, according to one embodiment of the invention;

Fig. 2B illustrates a schematic view of a single-pulse CARS spectrometer system, according to another embodiment of the invention;

Fig. 3A to 3C illustrate effect of a modulated spectral phase ftmction on the temporal shape of the pulse and on the population amplitude;

Fig. 4A to 4C illustrate examples of measurements of the Raman spectra obtained by varying the phase ftmction periodicity;

Fig. SA and 5B illustrate the nonresonant background suppression by using periodic spectral function with additional harmonics;

Fig. 6A to 6C illustrate effect of a π phase gate phase function on the temporal shape of the pulse and on the population amplitude;

Fig. 7A to 7D are examples of a numerical simulation illustrating the effect of the phase control by using an excitation phase with a narrow-band phase gate.

Fig. 8A and 8B illustrate measured normalized CARS spectra by using a transform limited pulse a phase gate shaped pulse for methanol and iodomethane, correspondingly;

PCI7IL2004/000083

Fig. 9A to 9D illustrate the normalized spectral intensity derived from the measured CARS spectra along with those obtained by computer simulations for several materials.

Fig. 10A to 10D illustrate CARS spectra from iodomethane obtained with polarization -only shaping and plotted for various probe bandwidths;

Fig. 11 shows a schematic drawing of the spectral intensity of a phase and polarization shaped excitation pulse;

Fig. 12 is a schematic drawing of the electric field envelope versus time for phase and polarization shaped pulses;

Fig. 13A to 13C illustrate CARS spectra from iodomethane obtained with both polarization and phase gate shaping and plotted for various probe bandwidths;

Fig. 14A to 14C illustrate examples of Raman spectra of several simple molecules obtained with phase and polarization shaped pulses;

Fig. 15 illustrates a schematic view of a single-pulse CARS microscopy system, according to one embodiment of the invention; and

Fig. 16A to 16D illustrate an example of depth-resolved single-pulse CARS images.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

The present invention provides a method and a CARS system such as spectrometer or microscope carrying out this method based on inducing the entire CARS process by producing a single (unitary) ultrashort optical excitation pulse that supplies all three photons (the pump photon, Stokes photon and probe photon) required for the CARS process.

The principles and operation of the CARS spectrometry and microscopy according to the present invention may be better understood with reference to the drawings and the accompanying description, it being understood that these drawings and examples in the description are given for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be limiting. The same reference numerals wdl be utilized for identifying those components which are common in the CARS spectrometer and microscope systems shown in the drawings throughout the present description of the invention. ______

It should be noted that the inducing of the entire CARS process by a single excitation pulse is feasible when the pulse duration is shorter than the vibrational period of the molecules of the medium under investigation. For example, a length of this excitation pulse can be in a femtosecond range. In this case, the CARS signal is produced by an intra-pulse four-wave mixing process. Each of the different components of the CARS signal is the resultant of the interference of all the quantum paths that contribute to the nonlinear polarization process.

It should also be noted that inducing the CARS process with a single excitation pulse is associated with several inherent difficulties. First of all, a te.r-.hnic.al difficulty arises from the partial spectral overlap between the spectral bands of the excitation pulse and the CARS signal, which can be orders of magnitude weaker than the pulse signal.

This difficulty, according to one embodiment of the invention, can be overcame by means of a partial blocking of the excitation pulse spectrum in the range of the expected CARS signal, and an appropriate spectral filtering of the measured CARS signal.

Moreover, if a medium is excited by a single spectral phase coherent or transform limited pulse (i.e., a pulse in which all frequency components have the same phase), then the CARS process can encounter the following difficulties:

One of the difficulties arises from the fact that all vibrational levels having the energy within the bandwidth of the transform limited pulse are excited. As a result, the spectral resolution of the CARS signal is limited by the excitation pulse bandwidth.

Another known difficulty, which is common to all CARS techniques utilizing femtosecond pulses and is therefore relevant also to the single-pulse CARS spectrometer and method of the present invention, results from a strong nonresonant background signal. As the bandwidth of the excitation pulse is increased (in other words, as the shorter excitation pulse having higher peak intensity is used), the magnitude of the background signal increases much more rapidly than the resonant CARS signal. The nonresonant background signal thus can be detrimental to the ability to spectrally resolve resonant transitions.

The present invention provides for eliminating the above difficulties by applying a quantum coherent control technique to the transform limited (spectral phase coherent) optical pulse. According to the invention, the quantum coherent control is achieved by means of a predetermined shaping of the transform limited pulse to produce a unitary optical excitation pulse that enables identification of a CARS signal induced by this pulse from any other optical signals.

Referring to Fig. 2A, there is schematically illustrated a CARS measurement system (spectrometer) 20 according to one embodiment of the present invention associated with a sample holder 29 containing a medium under investigation. The CARS spectrometer system 20 includes a single laser 21 adapted for producing optical transform-limited driving pulses 210 wherein each such pulse carries a pump, photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon which are necessary for exciting the medium and inducing the CARS process therein, a programmable pulse shaper 22 operable for shaping the input spectral phase coherent driving pulse to produce a unitary optical excitation pulse carrying the pump, Stokes and probe photons, a detector unit 26 for collecting a CARS signal coming from the medium and generating data indicative thereof, and a light directing optics for directing the input pulses to the medium and directing the CARS signal to the detector.

The laser 21 can be any laser capable to generate spectral phase coherent pulses in a femtosecond (is) time range. For example, the spectral phase coherent pulses can be in a range of about 5fs to lOOfs and, preferably, between lOfs and 20fs). For example, a Ti:Sapphire laser oscillator capable of generating 20fs fullwidth at half maximum (FWHM) spectral phase coherent pulses at 80MHz, centered at 815nm (corresponding to a bandwidth of about 75nm or an energy span of 1100cm'¹) can be employed for the purpose of the present invention. The programmable pulse shaper 22 is configured for shaping the input spectral phase coherent driving pulses by assigning a desired phase to each wavelength

PCI7IL2004/000083 component of the spectral phase coherent optical pulse, preferably only in a predetermined wavelength range, i.e., outside that where the CARS signal is most likely to occur. The use of such a pulse shaper enables for coherently controlling the CARS process.

A sample of the input spectral phase coherent pulse 210 generated by the laser 21 is directed to the pulse shaper assembly 22 by a mirror 23a, and a shaped pulse 220 produced by the shaper assembly 22 is directed to the holder 29 by a further mirror 23b. Obviously, each of these single-mirror elements of the light directing optics may be replaced by one or more beam splitter and/or a set of mirrors, or any other known light deflecting means.

In the present example of Fig. 2A, the programmable pulse shaper 22 is a

4-f shaper that includes an input dispersive assembly 221, an output dispersive assembly 222; an input focusing element 223, an output focusing element 224; and a programmable Spatial Light Modulator (SLM) 226 located at the Fourier plane defined by the focusing elements 223 and 224. In the present example, also provided in the pulse shaper 22 is a blocking element 225.

For example, the dispersive assemblies 221, 222 can be in the form of thin ruled reflective gratings with 1200 lines/mm, and the focusing elements 223, 224 can be achromat lenses (e.g., with a focal length of 100 mm). Though the above embodiment uses ruled reflective gratings at the input and output of the pulse shaper to spatially disperse and recombine the various frequency components of the pulses, it should be pointed out that any other suitable dispersive elements can be used, e.g., transmission gratings, prisms, or combinations thereof. Furthermore, the function of the focusing elements 223, 224 in defining the system Fourier plane (focal plane) at which the SLM 226 is located, can be fulfilled by any other element having positive focusing power, e.g., a concave mirror.

The blocking element 225 is, for example, a plate arranged for blocking at the Fourier plane wavelengths shorter than a predetermined wavelength (e.g., 780nm) in the range of a CARS signal, as they can spectrally overlap an output CARS signal 211. In the present example of Fig. 2A, the blocking element 225 is arranged between the SLM 226 and the output focusing element 224. However, as can be appreciated by a person skilled in the art, the blocking element 225 can be arranged either upstream or downstream of the SLM 226. Furthermore, the function of blocking element 225 can be fulfilled by any sharp-edge long-pass filter, e.g., a dielectric filter.

The programmable SLM 226 may be a liquid crystal based SLM of the type described by A. M. Weiner in the article published in Rev. Sci. Inst., 2000, V. 71, P. 1929. This SLM includes an SLM pixel array having 128 pixels at its Fourier plane. The spectral resolution, determined by the spot size at the Fourier plane, can be better than 0.5nm (equivalent to about 8cm‘¹).

The operation of the 4-f pulse shaper 22 is as follows. The input dispersive element 221 operates to spatially separate the frequency components of the input spectral phase coherent pulse. The input focusing element 223 focuses each of these frequency components to its specific position at the focal plane, where the SLM 226 is located. The blocking element 225 blocks at the Fourier plane wavelengths shorter than the predetermined wavelength. The SLM 226 is operative as an updateable filter for spectral manipulation of the incoming pulses, and allows the independent control ofthe phase and amplitude of each ofthe light components passing through 128 pixels, thereby modifying the pulse shape and temporal profile according to the desired pulse properties. For example, the width of each pixel is 97 pm, the inter-pixel gap is 3 pm, while the spot size at the focal plane is about 80 pm. The output focusing element 224 and output dispersive element 222 then recombine each of the separate frequency components to produce a shaped pulse 220.

Thus, the programmable pulse shaper 22 of Fig. 2 A is operable by a suitable control unit 27 for separating between different frequency components ofthe input pulse, blocking the predetermined frequencies (higher frequencies, which can overlap the CARS signal); and assigning the desired phase to each frequency component of the remaining (non-blocked) portion of the input pulse by using any desired spectral phase function.

PCT7IL2004/000083

The CARS spectrometer system 20 may utilize an. open loop control, in which the applied spectral phase function is derived theoretically for each experiment, or may utilize a closed feedback loop for determining the applied spectral phase function.

The shaped pulse 220 produced by the pulse shaper 22 carries a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon (which are necessary for exciting the medium and inducing the CARS process therein) and is therefore also referred to as “the unitary optical excitation pulse”.

The unitary optical excitation pulse 220 reflected from the mirror 23b is focused by a focusing assembly 24a onto the medium under investigation for exciting it and inducing a CARS process. In the present example, the focusing assembly 24a includes an objective lens arrangement having a 0.2 numerical aperture (NA).

The light directing optics further includes a lens assembly 24b accommodated for collection of the output CARS signal of the medium. This lens assembly 24b, preferably, has a numerical aperture similar or larger than that of the lens 24a. It should be noted that the focusing assembly 24a can also serve as a collecting optics in a back-scattered mode.

Further provided in the CARS spectrometer system 20 is a filtering assembly 25 operable for filtering the CARS signal obtained from the medium. In the present example, the filtering assembly 25 includes a spectral filter 251 (e.g., a bandpass or short-pass filter), and preferably includes a computer-controlled monochromator 252 or a spectrograph (not shown). An example of the filter 251 includes, but is not limited to, a 40nm FWHM bandpass filter centered at 750nm, while an example of the computer-controlled monochromator 252 includes, but is not limited to, a computer-controlled monochromator with a spectral resolution of 0.5nm (equivalent to about 8cm’¹ at 750nm).

The filtered output of the filtering assembly 25 is collected by the detector unit 26, which includes a detector 261 of the kind receiving a light signal and

PCI7IL2004/000083 generating an electrical output indicative thereof, and may also include a lock-in amplifier 262 operable by the control unit (computer) 27.

It should be appreciated that the construction and operation of the filter 251, monochromator 252, detector 261 and a lock-in amplifier 262 as well as the elements of the light directing optics, are known per se, and therefore need not be specifically described.

It should be noted that the measurable Raman energy range of the system 20 can, for example, be about 300cm’¹cm'¹, that is typical of carbon-halogen bond stretching. The lower limit of the measurable energy range is determined by the need to filter out the excitation pulse, while the upper limit is dictated by the excitation pulse bandwidth. Since the technique does not require electronic resonance with the driving input field, it can be implemented with any broadband optic source 21. The measurable Raman energy range of the system 20 can be extended to the fingerprint region (900cm‘¹cm’¹) by using pulses of duration 10fs-20fs, available in the state-of-the-art commercially available lasers.

Referring to Fig. 2B, a schematic view of a CARS spectrometer system 200 according to another embodiment of the present invention is schematically illustrated. The CARS spectrometer system 200, distinguishes from the CARS system 20 shown in Fig. 2A in that its shaper assembly, additionally to the phase modulator or as an alternative thereto, comprises a polarization control assembly. The latter includes a frequency-selective filter, such as grating 221, and a 90 degree polarization rotator accommodated in the optical path of the frequency components emerging from the filter and operable for applying a 90 degree polarization rotation to the predetermined frequency range of the input spectral phase coherent laser pulse, and comprises a crossed polarizer unit P_y accommodated in the optical path of a signal propagating from the medium to the detector for extraction of the crosspolarized CARS signal.

In the present example of Fig. 2B, the polarization rotator is constituted by an SLM arrangement 226, but it should be understood that any other suitable means can be used (e.g., a half-wavelength assembly). Additionally, in the example of Fig.

B, the polarization control assembly also includes a polarizer P_x accommodated in the optical path of the spectral phase coherent laser pulse propagating towards the shaper assembly. It should however be understood that the provision of this input polarizer P_x is optional, and can be eliminated by using a laser source producing linearly polarized light. In the example of Fig. 2B, the SLM unit can be operable for performing both the phase shaping and polarization rotation of the frequency components of the spectral phase coherent pulse. Generally, the phase assembly may comprise only a polarization rotator of any known suitable type. The SLM assembly suitable to be used in the system of the present invention may, for example, be of the type described by T. Brixner et al. in the articles published in Opt. Lett., 2001, V. 26, P. 557 and Appl. Phys., 2002, V. B74, P. S133. Such a programmable liquid crystal SLM 226 includes two SLM liquid crystal pixel arrays (dual cell SLM) whose preferential axes are at right angles to each other and are rotated by ±45° relative to the polarization of the input laser pulse (denoted as the x direction). Any difference in the applied retardance between the two arrays results in modification of the input pulse polarization. In this technique, the SLM can act as both a controlled spectral phase mask and as a controlled waveplate.

Thus, in this specific example, the programmable pulse shaper operates for both assigning the desired phase to each frequency component of the driving laser pulse, and controlling polarization of the pulse. In particular, the polarization control can be used to break the ultrashort input pulse 210 into a broadband pump and a narrow-band probe with orthogonal polarizations.

The nonlinear polarization producing the CARS signal driven by an electric field of the excitation pulse whose spectrum is E(to) can be approximated for nonresonant transitions, by using time dependent perturbation theory, as (for more details see, for example, Oron et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, V. 88, P. 63004):

co

P_n⁽_r³⁾ oc E(a> - Ω) Α(Ω), (1) where Α(Ω) = ί </ω׳£*(<Β׳-Ω)£(ύ>׳) is the probability amplitude to populate a

J 0 vibrational level with energy־#/? (henceforth, the population amplitude), while Ε(ω-Ω) represents the probe field.

Similarly, the nonlinear polarization for a singly resonant Raman transition through an intermediate level |i) at an energy of #/?_Λ and a bandwidth Γ can be approximated by p(3) *r “&lt;. Ε(ω-Ω) cc |iZQ--------------Α(Ω).

ο (Ω_λ-Ω) + 1Γ (2)

The CARS process can be controlled by controlling the population amplitude A(/?). The control of A(/2) is accomplished by controlling the spectral phase of the single broadband excitation pulse. Such a phase-only pulse shaping of the pulse merely means multiplication of the electric field E(a>) (that includes pump, Stockes and probe photons) by a phase function exp(i Φ(co)).

The population of a vibrational level at energy ΗΩ_Λ is proportional to

12 μ^|²=|Ρω£(ίυ>.(®-Ω_Λ)| , (3) where E - εχρ(ΐΦ(ω)) is the complex spectral amplitudes of the applied field.

Each level is thus excited by all frequency pairs separated by Ω_κ. The interference between the multiple paths leading to the population of the level Ω_Λ is determined by the relative phase of each contribution Φ(ω)-Φ(ω-Ωχ). Thus, constructive interference is achieved when Φ(ω)=Φ(ω-Ωχ) for all frequency components of the excitation pulse. Therefore, if the excitation pulse is a spectral phase coherent or transform-limited pulse (all frequency components having the same phase), then the constructive interference holds for all values of Ω&amp; thus spectral resolution is lost.

According to one example of the phase control, that has been first described by the inventors in an article entitled “Single-pulse coherently-controlled nonlinear Raman spectroscopy and microscopy published in Nature, V. 418, PP. 512514־ (August 2002), the spectral phase of the excitation pulse is modulated periodically with a period Ω_ο. In such a case, the constructive interference can be induced for all energy levels only for /¾ ⁼N&amp;0 (where N is an integer). Figs. 3A- 3C illustrate an effect of a modulated spectral phase function on the temporal shape of the pulse and on the population amplitude, according to this specific example of the phase control.

Fig. 3A shows an example of an input pulse spectral intensity 31, a spectral phase 32 of the transform limited pulse, and a modulated spectral phase 33 of the shaped pulse (unitary excitation pulse). Also shown is a ־typical spectral region where the CARS signal can be measured. Thus, in order to avoid the spectral overlap between the input pulse and a CARS signal, the power spectrum of the input pulse is blocked at 730nm. (Note that the spectral intensity of the CARS signal is identified by a reference numeral 34).

Fig. 3B shows in time domain a temporal intensity of spectral phase coherent pulse 35 corresponding to the uniform phase (32 in Fig. 3A), and a modulated phase shaped pulse 36 corresponding to the modulated phase (33 in Fig. 3A). As can be understood from Fig. 3B, a periodic spectral phase is equivalent to splitting the pulse in time domain to several equally spaced pulses, each delayed by τ₀=2π/ϊ3). This pulse train is capable of resonantly exciting only vibrations with a period T = To/N.

Fig. 3C shows a calculated population amplitude A (Ω) for the spectral phase coherent pulse 37 and for the pulse having the modulated phase 38. As can be seen in Fig. 3C, for the case of the spectral phase coherent pulse, the population amplitude decays monotonically versus the vibration energy. On the other hand, for the case of a modulated phase function, an oscillation appears where the peak of each oscillation reaches the spectral phase coherent (transform limited) result.

The resonant and nonresonant processes described above have different spectral responses, which result from the different weights that multiply the population amplitude in Eq. (2) and Eq. (3), as determined by the resonance levels.

According to Eq. (2), the resonant CARS process can be expressed as (4)

^־⁸^ז־׳לסס,^ ^RJ ¹ R where ς is the principal value of Cauchy. The first term in Eq. (4) corresponds to the “on-resonant” contribution, while the second term corresponds to integration 5 over the contribution of the “off-resonant” spectral components. The resonant signal thus has a narrow response around Ω=Ω_Ά.

The weight function of the integrand of the second term inverts its sign around the resonance, therefore the total contribution of the integral depends on the symmetry of Ε(ω-Ω)Α(Ω) around Ω=Ω_Κ. In the spectral phase coherent 10 (transform limited) case, both Α(Ω) and Ε(ω-Ω) are nearly symmetric for all values of Ω Therefore, the off-resonant term is negligible. The polarization spectrum can be approximated in this case by

P™ «irtCE(a> -Ω_λ Μ(Ω_λ ) (5) which is a replica of the pulse spectrum shifted by /¾. Spectral phase manipulation 15 will change the symmetry of Ε(ω-Ω)Α(Ω) for different values ω, and will therefore induce variations ofthe polarization spectrum.

However, when the modulation frequency significantly exceeds 2π/Δω (here, Δω is the pulse spectral bandwidth), the total signal intensity averages out and is proportional to \Α(Ω#)\².

By the same token, the measured nonresonant intensity averages out to become proportional to J— Α(Ω) . The total measured signal is the interference of the signals generated by the two different processes. In the common case where the nonresonant background is considerably larger than the resonant signal, the resonant signal is measured by ”heterodyne detection” with it, to yield |p⁽³⁾(6²|(ע = |?r⁽³⁾ (ω) + Pn⁽³⁾ (®)|² «|pr⁽³⁾ (0)|² + 2Re [pf⁽³⁾ (ω)Ρ_η⁽³⁾ (ω)‘]. (6)

By exploiting the different spectral response of the resonant and nonresonant components, it is possible to significantly reduce the nonresonant background while maintaining the resonant signal. Following the above derivation, it can be clear to a person versed in the art that properly choosing the periodicity of the phase function, the population and thus the resonant CARS signal is reconstructed to nearly the value achieved by a spectral phase coherent pulse.

Thus, it was shown above that the coherent control of the CARS process via manipulation of the vibrational level population amplitude Α(Ω) can be accomplished by applying periodic spectral phase function (e.g., sinusoidal function) producing periodical modulation of the spectral phase of the excitation pulse.

Referring to Figs. 4A-4C, measurements of the Raman spectrum are exemplified. The Raman spectrum has been obtained by monitoring the total CARS signal, while varying the phase function periodicity. According to this examples, a simple periodic spectral phase function 0(®)=1.25cos(Ca)) (wherein C is a constant) has been applied to the input spectral phase coherent pulse for its shaping. Presented in Figs. 4A-4C are the intensities of the CARS signal versus the number of periods of the sinusoidal phase across the spatial light modulator (SLM). ^,The insets show the Raman spectrum, derived by Fourier transformation of the corresponding measured intensity signals.

More specifically, Fig. 4A illustrates single-pulse CARS spectroscopy of methanol molecules in the liquid phase. As can be seen for methanol, which has no Raman resonance levels at the measured frequency range, only a monotonic decrease of the nonresonant signal is observed as the number of oscillation periods is increased.

Fig. 4B illustrates single-pulse CARS spectroscopy of CH₂Br₂ molecules in the liquid phase. As can be seen, for CH₂Br₂, which has a single resonance at £¾1=577011^, the Raman signal oscillates periodically, whenever the modulation period is an integer fraction of /¾. The Fourier transform operation retrieves the single Raman resonant level with a resolution that is inversely proportional to the number of modulation periods.

Fig. 4C illustrates single-pulse CARS spectroscopy of (CH₂C1)₂ molecules in the liquid phase. As can be seen, for the material with two resonant levels, such as (CH₂C1)₂, two resonant peaks (at 652cm'¹ and 750cm'¹) are observed in the

Raman spectrum.

The spectral resolution of the Fourier transform operation is better than the pulse bandwidth by a factor of 40 (i.e., about 30cm'¹). It is limited by the maximal number of phase modulation periods on the spatial light modulator (SLM), technically determined by the number of pixels on the SLM.

Thus, spectral resolution can be optimized by employing a simple sinusoidal phase function. Breaking the single pulse into a longer train, than used in the above example, containing a larger number of pulses can further reduce the nonresonant background, which depends directly on the pulse peak intensity. This is achieved by adding higher harmonics orders to the applied phase functions. This phase function can be expressed as a summation of the different harmonics orders as φ(&>) = A״cos(C_nco), where A״ are the different harmonic order coefficients.

n

Referring to Figs. 5A-5B, a demonstration of the nonresonant background suppression by using periodic spectral functions with additional harmonics is illustrated for methanol (nonresonant component only) and CH3I (a single resonance at 523cm'¹), respectively. The CARS signal of relative intensity is shown versus the number of phase oscillation periods across the spatial light modulator for both a sinusoidal phase function Φ(ω)=1.25003(ϋω) (curve 51) and a phase function Φ(ω)=1.4003(Οω)-1.4βο3(2€ω) which contains an additional harmonic component (curve 52). The CARS signal is plotted relative to that obtained by a spectral phase coherent (transform-limited) pulse (0 phase function oscillations). It should be noted that to achieve adequate suppression of the nonresonant background at least several oscillation periods of the phase function across the pulse spectrum are necessary.

Figs. 5A shows how the use of a phase function containing only one additional harmonic allows for attenuating the nonresonant background by nearly two orders of magnitude.

Figs. 5B shows that the use of a phase function containing two components attenuates significantly the nonresonant background, while the resonant component is almost completely restored. The achieved contrast between the resonant signal and the nonresonant background is thus greatly improved.

According to another example of the phase control, the spectral phase of the excitation pulse can be controlled by applying to the excitation pulse a narrow-band phase gate near its short wavelength (high-energy) end. In other words, a narrowband feature is applied to the pulse for inducing sharp changes in the phase of the factor Ε(ω-Ω) in Eqs. (1) and (2). Preferably, but not necessarily, the phase of the phase gate spectral function can be shifted by π at 6y-22 Such spectral phase function hereinafter will be referred to as a π phase gate. For example, a bandwidth of the π phase gate can be in the range of about 0.5nm to 3nm (i.e., 5-30011⁴). Preferably, the π phase gate is spectrally located in the vicinity of a short wavelength end of the excitation pulse.

In this scheme, a narrow spectral band in the excitation pulse is phase shifted, serving as an effective probe, and the Raman spectrum is extracted from the interference pattern of the resonant signal with the nonresonant background.

Referring to Figs. 6A-6C, there is illustrated an effect of a π phase gate on the temporal shape of the pulse and on the population amplitude, according to this specific example of the phase control.

Fig. 6A shows an example of the excitation pulse spectral intensity 61, a spectral phase 62 of the transform limited (unshaped) pulse, and a π phase-gate 63 of the shaped pulse. In this example, the π phase-gate 63 has the bandwidth of about 1.5nm centered at 790nm. Also shown is a typical spectral region where the CARS signal can be measured. Thus, in order to avoid the spectral overlap between the input pulse and a CARS signal the power spectrum’of the input pulse is blocked at about 780nm. Note that the spectral intensity of the CARS signal is identified by a reference numeral 64. __

Fig. 6B shows in time domain a temporal intensity (temporal envelope) of a spectral phase coherent pulse 65 and a temporal intensity of a π phase-gate shaped pulse 66. As can be seen, the narrow π phase gate hardly effect the form of the pulse, merely reducing the peak intensity by about 15%.

Fig. 6C shows a calculated population amplitude A (Ω) for the spectral phase coherent pulse 67 and for the pulse having the modulated phase 68. As can be seen in Fig. 6C, for the case of the spectral phase coherent pulse, the population amplitude decays monotonically versus the vibration energy. The changes due to the phase gate slightly modify the population amplitude Α(Ω). This modification depends on the width of the phase gate. Thus, the population amplitude Α(Ω) is hardly modified for a narrow gate, since the energy content in a narrow spectral band part is negligible compared with the entire pulse energy.

The resonant signal from a level /¾ at any given frequency ω is centered at ω-Ωκ, due to a rather narrow band probe. In contrast, the nonresonant background signal is a coherent sum contributed by a large portion of the pulse bandwidth. Thus, phase changes over a narrow spectral band, while dramatically affecting the phase of the resonant signal, hardly modify the phase of the nonresonant signal. The relative phase between the nonresonant background signal and the resonant signal should therefore vary rapidly, inducing either constructive or destructive interference at the phase gate edges. Measuring the total CARS spectrum, the interference pattern between the resonant signal and the nonresonant background can be interpreted to reveal the vibrational energy level diagram.

The effect of the phase control by using an excitation phase with a narrowband phase gate is demonstrated in the numerical simulation results shown in Figs. 7A-7D. .

Fig. 7A shows a calculated CARS electric field as a function of frequency (spectrum) of both the resonant contribution 71 and the nonresonant contribution 72 along with the relative phase 73 between them for a spectral phase coherent pulse illuminating iodomethane (resonant at 523 cm'¹). Fig 7B shows the calculated resulting CARS spectrum 74for the illuminating of iodomethane with a spectral phase coherent pulse.

As can be seen, the nonresonant background spectrum 72 monotonically decreases towards higher energies (short wavelengths), while the resonant signal 71 resembles the excitation pulse spectrum, shifted by the Raman level energy. The relative phase 73 between the two is nearly constant at about π/2, rising to about π below 749nm.

Fig. 7C shows a calculated CARS spectrum of both the resonant contribution 75 and the nonresonant contribution 76 along with the relative phase 77 between them for the illuminating of iodomethane by a π phase gate shaped pulse. Fig 7D shows the calculated resulting CARS spectrum 78 for the spectral phase coherent pulse illuminating iodomethane. Three effects can be seen in Fig. 7C. First, there is some reduction of the nonresonant background component. Second, the relative phase between the resonant component and the nonresonant background component varies between 0 (constructive interference) at the highenergy (short wavelength) side of the gate, and π (destructive interference) at the low energy (long wavelength) side. Third, two new peaks 79 appear in the resonant spectrum 75, at both ends of the phase gate. The peaks 79 are due to a transient enhancement effect, demonstrated by Oron et al. previously in conventional multibeam CARS and described in Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, V. 88, P. 63004.

As can be seen in Fig 7D, the net result is a sharp peak 710, followed by a deep dip 720 in the total CARS signal 78. It should be noted that this peak-dip feature determines the energy of the vibrational level with an accuracy of the phase gate width. For example, the phase gate can be defined by three pixels on the SLM, corresponding, to about 25 cm'¹, that is about 40 times better than the excitation pulse width.

Referring to Figs. 8A and 8B, measured normalized CARS spectra are illustrated for the case of a spectral phase coherent pulse (curves 81a and 81b) and the case of a phase gate shaped pulse (curves 82a and 82b), respectively, for methanol (having nonresonant component only) and for iodomethane (having a resonant at 523 cm'¹). The peak-dip feature due to the resonant contribution at 523 cm‘¹ can be seen in the iodomethane spectrum (Fig. 8B), while the normalized methanol spectrum (Fig. 8A) remains nearly unchanged.

The Raman level structure can be easily extracted from the measured spectrum by considering, for example, the normalized spectral intensity variation of the CARS signal /(Ω) = Ι(ω_ε +Ω-Δ/2)-/(ω_ε + Ω+Δ/2) ״^ϊ+Ω+Δ/2Ζ(β?)ίΖΰ?

>_t+n-A/2 (7) where 0)_g is the central frequency of the phase gate and Δ is the gate width. It should be understood that the normalization is required to compensate for the decrease in the nonresonant background towards higher energies.

Referring to Figs. 9A-9D, plots of the normalized spectral intensity f(Q) derived from the measured CARS spectra (curves 91, 92, 93 and 94) are given in for several materials, along with simulation predictions (curves 95, 96, 97 and 98) obtained by computer simulations.

As can be seen in Fig. 9A, a nearly flat line is observed for methanol, having no Raman level in this range. The 459 cm'¹ level of carbon tetrachloride is easily observed in Fig. 9B. For mesitylene (Fig. 9C), having two Raman levels at 515cm‘¹ and 575cm‘¹, two well-separated peaks can be seen. At the high-energy end, the 652cm‘¹ level of carbon disulfide is shown in Fig. 9D. It should be noted that the spectral resolution observed in these figures is of the order of about 30cm‘¹, (i.e., almost a factor of 40 better than the excitation pulse bandwidth). The resolution is determined by both the width of the phase gate (25 cm‘¹) and the monochromator resolution (about 8 cm'¹). The minimal phase gate width is determined by both the pixellization of the SLM and by the spot size of the incident beam on it. In all the examples presented above the phase gate consisted of three pixels on the SLM.

It should be understood that for detection of a given Raman level, it is possible to control the relative intensity ratio between the resonant and the nonresonant components by varying the spectral location of the phase gate. This is due to the fact that the nonresonant background decreases towards higher energies. Additionally, a further control is possible by varying the phase gate width. Thus, a wider probe width can improve the resonant to nonresonant intensity ratio (while resulting in lower spectral resolution). In this case, even weak Raman levels can be observed by using this scheme.

The benefits of broadband excitation can be fully exploited when attempting to detect materials with several vibrational bands in the measured energy range. In this case, a spectral phase mask having multiple phase gates at appropriate locations can be used to generate a large coherent spectral feature in the CARS spectrum, due to the constructive interference of the resonant contributions from the various levels.

According to another embodiment of the invention, the CARS process is controlled by controlling the polarization of the excitation pulse. It should be appreciated that the polarization control can be carried out in addition to the shaping, i.e., correcting of the dispersion of the input pulse and assigning of the desired phase to each frequency component of the driving pulse.

In particular, the polarization control can be used to break the ultrashort input pulse into a broadband pump and a narrow-band probe with orthogonal polarizations.

The nonlinear polarization producing the CARS signal driven by an electric field whose spectrum is Ε(ω) can be approximated for nonresonant transitions:

¾) “Zin, (8) where A_lm(Q)= J da'E_t* (ω'-Ώ}Ε״(ω') is the population amplitude and is the third order susceptibility tensor.

In turn, for a singly resonant Raman transition through an intermediate level |i) at an energy of /2/¾ and a bandwidth Γ, one can obtain:

(9)

The two main differences between the resonant and nonresonant components are as follows. First, the resonant component has a narrow spectral response, centered at Ω=Ω_Κ3 whereas the spectral response of the nonresonant component is broad. Second, the response of the resonant component inverts sign at about Ω=Ω&amp;, while the nonresonant response has a constant phase. It will be shown hereinbelow how these differences are used to reduce the nonresonant component while enhancing the resonant component.

One approach to single-pulse polarization controlled CARS would be to rotate by π/2 the polarization of the excitation pulse in a narrow band at its high energy end, from an x-plane to a }׳-plane, and to monitor the CARS signal in the y-plane. As a result, the monitored signal will effectively dependent only on A&amp; (as the polarization field), and on E_y (as the probe). This is true for both the resonant and nonresonant terms.

As was mentioned above for the case of the coherent control by means of a phase gate, the ratio of the resonant signal to the nonresonant signal of the background as well as the spectral resolution can be improved when the probe pulse becomes longer. According to this embodiment of the invention, the duration of the probe pulse is determined by the spectral width of the polarization shifted band.

Referring to Figs. 10A-10D, examples of the CARS spectra from iodomethane obtained with polarization-only shaping are plotted for various polarized probe spectral bandwidths. The total bandwidth of the polarized probe decreases as follows: 4.5nm (for the example shown in Fig. 10A); 2.3nm (for the example shown in Fig. 10B); 1.2nm (for the example shown in Fig. IOC) and 0.6nm (for the example shown in Fig. 10D). As the probe bandwidth is decreased from 4.5nm (corresponding to 400fs) to 0.6nm (corresponding to 3ps), the resonant component, due to its narrow spectral response, becomes narrower but maintains its strength. In contrast, the nonresonant background component, having a broad spectral response, becomes weaker but maintains its spectral shape. Since the two are coherent, they, generate an interference pattern, interfering constructively at the low-energy end of the probe pulse, and destructively at its high-energy end. This interference pattern obscures 1he interpretation and calls for further reduction ofthe nonresonant background.

Further reduction of the nonresonant background is achieved by using both the polarization control and the phase control. It will be shown below that the combination of both the phase and the polarization controls can lead to nearly complete suppression of the nonresonant component, yielding background-free single-pulse multiplex CARS spectra with a high spectral resolution.

Fig. 11 exemplifies the spectral intensity of a phase and polarization shaped excitation pulse. According to this example, a π phase-shifted gate 110 is introduced at a y polarization shifted band 111, serving as a probe. The probe is thus split into two spectrally distinct longer probe pulses with opposite phase. Due to the broad nonresonant spectral response, the nonresonant background from these two probe pulses interferes destructively. Since the Αχ/Ω) component of the amplitude is a very smooth function, these two probe pulses are almost equal in magnitude. As a result, the nonresonant background component of the CARS signal can be reduced by orders of magnitude.

This reduction can be alternatively viewed in time domain. Fig. 12 shows a schematic drawing of the electric field envelope versus time in both the x polarization (curve 121) and the y polarization (curve 122) for both phase and polarization shaped pulse. For convenience, the x polarization field has been reduced by about two orders of magnitude. As can be appreciated, the π phase gate modifies the temporal shape of the y polarized probe so that the electric field envelope crosses zero at the peak of the x polarized driving field.

Due to the instantaneous nonresonant response, the nonresonant background is almost completely suppressed. The resonant signal response is different. It should be noted that the π phase gate compensates for the sign inversion of the denominator in Eq. 9, leading to an increased resonant signal over a narrow spectral band shifted by the Raman level energy from the π phase gate location.

Referring to Figs. 13A-13C, examples of the CARS spectra from iodomethane obtained with both polarization and ־מ phase gate shaping are plotted for various probe spectral bandwidths. According to these examples, the total probe bandwidth varies from 4.5nm (for the example shown in Fig. 13A) to 2.4nm (for the example shown in Fig. 13B), and then further to 1.2nm (for the example shown in Fig. 13C). When the measured spectra obtained by using the polarization and phase shaped probe pulses (shown in Figs. 13A - 13C) are compared to the measured spectra obtained by using polarization-only shaped spectral phase coherent pulses (shown in Figs. 10A-10D), a dramatic decrease in the nonresonant background can be seen. It should be noted that the small nonresonant background that is still observed using the phase- shaped probe is in fact a small fraction (about 0.05%) of the component which leaks through the polarizer due to small birefringence of the microscope objective and collection optics. However, since this background component is independent on the applied phase and polarization, it can be easily subtracted.

Referring to Figs. 14A-14C, examples of Raman spectra of several simple molecules obtained with phase and polarization shaped pulses are illustrated. The total probe bandwidth has been about 1.2nm, including a π phase gate at the bandwidth’s center. The “raw” measured CARS spectra are shown in the left part of the figures. It should be noted that the small nonresonant background that is still observed is in fact a small fraction (about 0.05%) of the component which leaks through the polarizer due to small birefringence of the microscope objective and collection optics. Since this background component is independent on the applied phase and polarization, it can be easily subtracted. The extracted Raman spectra, from which the background due to birefringence was subtracted, are plotted on the right part of the figures.

Fig. 14A shows a peak 141 corresponding to the 523cm'¹ Raman level of iodomethane. The full-width at half maximum of this peak is about 15 cm'¹.

The measured Raman spectrum of 1,2-dichloroethane is shown in Fig. 14B. The levels at 652cm'¹ and 750 cm¹, separated by 98cm¹, are seen as two very well separated peaks 142 and 143. This spectrum also has a peak 144 corresponding to the level at 298cm'¹ located at the lower limit of the detectable region.

The Raman spectrum of p-xylene, having a peak 145 corresponding to the level at 830cm'¹, is shown in Fig. 14C. This example demonstrates the ability of the technique of the present invention to observe the high-energy end of the detectable region. It should be noted that the measured energy range can be extended to higher frequencies (1000-15000cm'¹) by using shorter pulses.

Single-pulse CARS is particularly suitable for nonlinear microscopy. Fig. 15 exemplifies a single-pulse CARS microscope 150 according to the invention. Generally, the CARS microscope 150 includes all the elements of the singlepulse spectrometer (20 in Fig. 2A or 200 in Fig. 2B) needed for inducing a CARS process in the molecules of a target material and for detecting the CARS signal scattered by the material. More specifically, the CARS microscope 150 includes means for inducing the CARS process by producing a beam constituted of unitary optical excitation pulses and directing it through the target material placed on a sample holder 29. According to the technique of the present invention, each pulse is a unitary pulse that carries a pump photon, a Stokes photon and a probe photon. The CARS microscope thus includes a laser 21 adapted for generating at least one spectral phase coherent (transform limited) optical pulse and a programmable pulse shaper 22 (constituting a control means for coherently controlling the CARS process) operable for shaping the transform limited optical excitation pulse obtained from the laser 21, a detector unit 26, and a light directing optics. The shaping is carried out by correcting the pulse dispersion as well as assigning the desired phase (and, optionally, polarization) to the pulse, as described above.

The light directing optics of the CARS microscope 150 includes a focusing assembly (e.g., a microscope objective) 24a arranged for creating a focal spot 152 formed by the beam on the target material; a lens assembly 24b arranged for collecting the output CARS signal from the target material; and a filtering assembly 25 operable for filtering the collected output CARS signal propagating towards the detector unit 26. All these components are similar to those described above in connection with the CARS spectrometer system (20 in Fig. 2A or 200 in Fig. 2B).

The CARS microscope 150 utilizes scanning of at least a portion of the target material with the focal spot 152, which can be implemented by supporting the sample holder on a stage 151 driven for movement, and/or by mounting at least some of optical elements for movement with respect to the sample holder to thereby appropriately deflect the incident beam. The microscope objective 24a may for example be that commercially available from ZEISS. The stage driver may include a piezoelectric transducer, e.g., P-282 XYZ Nano positioners commercially available from Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH.

An example of single-pulse spectrally resolved microscopy is demonstrated herein below. A selected target material was a glass capillary plate with lO-pm holes filled with CH₂Br₂ (having a resonant at 577cm‘¹). The sample was raster-scanned around the focused laser beam using computer-controlled piezoelectric drivers.

An image shown in Fig. 16A was taken with a pulse shape maximizing the relative intensity of the resonant contribution, whereas the image shown in Fig. 16B was taken with a pulse shape minimizing this intensity.

The predominantly resonant signal from the filled holes shown in Fig. 16A is larger by a factor of 4 than that in Fig. 16B, while the signals obtained from the glass is almost similar.

Fig. 16C shows an image that is a difference between the images in Fig. 16A and Fig. 16B, depicting the signal from the 577cm‘¹ vibrational level of CH₂Br₂. ^,This image appears inverted relative to that obtained by using a spectral phase coherent pulse (shown in Fig. 16D), where the glass, having a larger nonresonant signal, appears_brighter. The image in Fig. 16C demonstrates the ability of the microscope to spectrally resolve the Raman resonant contribution of a single vibrational level. In a practical system, the difference image can be directly measured by lock-in detection, alternating the phase masks of the images shown in Figs. 16A and 16B at a high frequency.

It should be appreciated that for materials having more than one vibrational level it is possible to improve the detection selectivity by tailoring shaped pulses to induce constructive quantum interference of these levels.

As such, those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains, can appreciate that while the present invention has been described in terms of preferred embodiments, the concept upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, systems and processes for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention.

Although the example of utilization of the CARS spectrometer technique of the present invention were shown for CARS microscopy, the spectral measurement utilizing the coherent control of the present invention can be easily combined with other nonlinear microscopic methods such as multiphoton fluorescence and thirdharmonic generation using the same microscope system.

Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.

It is important, therefore, that the scope of the invention is not construed as being limited by the illustrative embodiments set forth herein. Other variations are possible within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.