Nox reduction catalyst for high-temperature exhaust gas, method for producing same, and method for reducing nox in high-temperature exhaust gas

Field

The present invention relates to a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, a manufacturing method thereof, and a NOx removal method for high-temperature flue gas, and more particularly relates to a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas suitable for reducing and removing nitrogen oxide contained in high-temperature gas discharged from a thermal power plant, a gas turbine or the like.

Background

High-temperature combustion flue gas discharged from a thermal power plant, a gas turbine or the like contains nitrogen oxide, and to discharge the flue gas, nitrogen oxide in flue gas needs to be removed. Therefore, NOx removal equipment is installed on a downstream side of a combustion engine, and a reducing agent is injected from an injection nozzle into combustion flue gas so that the reducing agent reductively reacts with nitrogen oxide (NO, N0₂), thereby decomposing combustion flue gas into harmless nitrogen (N₂) and water (H₂O). At the time of this operation, in a method of removing nitrogen oxide from flue gas by using a NOx removal catalyst, ammonia (NH₃), urea or the like is normally added thereto due to the necessity of causing a sufficient denitration reaction.

Conventionally, when nitrogen oxide in flue gas is decreased, ammonia is added thereto as a reducing agent, and when a NOx removal catalyst is used, processing is performed normally in a high-temperature region of 300°C or higher. The denitration reaction makes progress according to following equation (1), and nitrogen oxide is decomposed into N₂ and H₂O in a reaction between 1 mole of NO and 1 mole of NH₃.         4NH₃+4NO+O₂ → 4N₂+6H₂O     (1)

However, in the conventionally used catalyst, when a temperature becomes as high as 450°C or higher, an oxidation reaction of NH₃ itself makes progress according to following equation (2) or equation (3), other than the above equation (1).         2N3+5/2O₂ → 2NO+3H₂O     (2)         4NH₃+3O₂ → 2N₂+6H₂O     (3) Due to the reaction according to the equation (2) or the equation (3), NH₃ is not effectively used for reduction of NO, and the NOx removal performance decreases with an increase of the temperature. Therefore, for example, when gas turbine outlet flue gas of 500°C or higher is to be processed, the reducing agent is not sufficient, and thus application of a conventional reduction process accompanying ammonia addition has been difficult.

Meanwhile, as a removal method of nitrogen oxide at a high temperature, a technique of using titanium oxide containing heat-resistant inorganic fiber as a carrier has been reported (see Patent Literature 1).

Citation List

Patent Literature

<ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>Patent Literature 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. <patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="JPH6327944B"><text>H6-327944</text></patcit></li><li>Patent Literature 2: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. <patcit id="pcit0002" dnum="JPH2229547B"><text>H2-229547</text></patcit></li></ul>

Summary

Technical Problem

However, in a catalyst in which tungsten is simply supported as an active component on titanium oxide, which is a carrier, there is a limitation in catalyst activity even when optimization is made by the physical strength of inorganic fiber or the like, and it has been difficult to promote the denitration reaction efficiently.

Further, there has been a proposal of a carrier for a flue-gas processing catalyst formed of inorganic refractory oxide containing titanium-zirconium complex oxide having a crystal structure known as ZrTiO₄ (see Patent Literature 2). However, in an example showing the effect thereof, only NOx removal tests at 420°C are shown, and there is no finding that it can be actually applicable to purification of flue gas at the gas turbine outlet temperature of 500°C or higher, more preferably, 600°C or higher.

Accordingly, there has been desired a development of a catalyst that can maintain a high-temperature NOx removal performance at 500°C or higher for a long time by using a specific active metal, while suppressing a decrease in a specific surface area by using complex oxide as a catalyst carrier (TiO₂).

The present invention has been achieved in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas that can maintain a NOx removal performance at a temperature as high as 500°C or higher for a long time, a manufacturing method of the NOx removal catalyst, and a NOx removal method for high-temperature flue gas.

Solution to Problem

According to an aspect of the present invention, in an NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas containing nitrogen oxide, tungsten oxide is supported on a complex oxide carrier containing titanium oxide.

According to another aspect of the present invention, in a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas containing nitrogen oxide, tungsten oxide with number of molecular layers of tungsten oxide (WO₃) being five or less is supported on a complex oxide carrier containing titanium oxide.

Advantageously, in the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, a support quantity of the WO₃ is equal to or more than 8% by weight in a weight ratio of entire catalyst.

Advantageously, in the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, complex oxide is complex oxide of a titanium compound complexed with either a zirconium compound or a silica compound.

Advantageously, in the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, sulfate radicals are caused to remain.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, a manufacturing method of a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, a substance containing either a zirconium compound or a silica compound and a titanium compound is fired at 500°C to obtain a complex oxide carrier, and tungsten oxide is supported on the complex oxide carrier and fired at 650°C to obtain a powdered catalyst.

Advantageously, in the manufacturing method of a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, sulfate radicals are caused to remain in the complex oxide carrier, and tungsten oxide is supported on the carrier in which sulfate radicals remain, and then fired.

According to still another aspect of the present invention, in a NOx removal method of high-temperature flue gas, flue gas at a temperature of 500°C or higher is caused to circulate in the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas according to any one of above, to decompose and remove nitrogen oxide in the flue gas. Advantageous Effects of Invention

In the high-temperature NOx removal catalyst according to the present invention, WO₃ is supported on complex oxide, and by preferably setting the number of molecular layers of WO₃ to five or less, even when high-temperature denitration is continued, a bonding force with a carrier of WO₃ can be properly maintained and volatilization can be suppressed while maintaining a high NOx removal performance.

Description of Embodiments

Exemplary embodiments and examples of the present invention will be explained below in detail. The present invention is not limited to the embodiments and examples. In addition, constituent elements in the following embodiments include those that can be easily assumed by persons skilled in the art or that are substantially equivalent. A NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas according to the present invention contains nitrogen oxide, in which tungsten oxide (WO₃) is supported on a complex oxide carrier containing titanium oxide, and preferably, tungsten oxide having five or less molecular layers of WO₃ is supported thereon.

The complex oxide constituting the carrier is obtained by firing either a zirconium compound or a silica compound and a titanium compound at a high temperature.

In the present invention, tungsten oxide (WO₃) to be used as an active component is supported, and preferably, tungsten oxide (WO₃) having five or less molecular layers is supported. The number of molecular layers indicates a thickness of the molecular layer of tungsten oxide (WO₃) formed on the catalyst carrier. Particularly, when high-temperature denitration is continued, a specific surface area of the catalyst carrier increases, to increase the number of molecular layers, as described in Examples and Comparative examples described later, and thus there is such a tendency that a NOx removal efficiency decreases. Further, "number of molecular layers of WO₃" described in the present invention is defined as follows. <maths id="math0001"><math display="block"><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mi>Number of molecular layers</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mi>area of unimolecular layer of</mi><mspace width="1em" /><msub><mi>WO</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn></msub><mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">*</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msup><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">100</mn><mo>⁢</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><mi>catalyst</mi></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mi>specific surface area of catalyst carrier</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msup><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">100</mn><mo>⁢</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><mi>catalyst</mi></mfenced></math><img file="EP2384807A1_D0001.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0002"><math display="block"><mtable columnalign="left"><mtr><mtd><mi>Regarding</mi><mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">*</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">,</mo><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mi>area of unimolecular layer of</mi><mspace width="1em" /><msub><mi>WO</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msup><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">100</mn><mo>⁢</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><mi>catalyst</mi></mfenced></mtd></mtr><mtr><mtd><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mi>number of moles of</mi><mspace width="1em" /><msub><mi>WO</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn></msub><mspace width="1em" /><mi>in catalyst</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msup><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">100</mn><mo>⁢</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">g</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><mi>catalyst</mi></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><msub><mi>number of moles of unimolecular layer of WO</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn></msub><mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">*</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mfenced><mo>⁢</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><mi>number of moles of mol</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn><mspace width="1em" /><msup><mi>cm</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msup></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">"</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">.</mn></mtd></mtr></mtable></math><img file="EP2384807A1_D0002.tif" /></maths> Regarding (*2), when it is assumed that a density of tungsten oxide is 7.16 [g/cm³], a molecular weight thereof is 231.8 [g/mol], and an atomic radius of tungsten is 193 [pm], "number of moles of unimolecular layer of WO₃" = (7.16/231.8) [number of moles of tungsten oxide per lcm³] × 193/10¹⁰ [pm is converted to cm] =5.96e^-10.

A support quantity of tungsten oxide (WO₃) with respect to the entire catalyst is preferably 8% by weight or more in a weight ratio of the entire catalyst, and more preferably, 12% to 24% by weight. This is because if the support quantity exceeds 24% by weight, a further effect of increase in weight of tungsten cannot be obtained, thereby causing a cost increase.

In the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas according to the present invention, sulfate processing can be performed so that the reducing agent in an added amount can effectively exert its effects on the catalyst by suppressing decomposition of ammonia as a reducing agent up to a high temperature region by an increase in an acid amount or acid strength of the catalyst carrier. The sulfate processing is a processing method in which complex oxide for the carrier is immersed, for example, in sulfuric acid and then dried, and the complex oxide is dried again in a heating furnace in a high temperature atmosphere (for example, 500°C to 600°C), so that sulfate radicals remain in the carrier component.

An example of a manufacturing method of the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas according to the present invention is described below. First, a substance containing either a zirconium compound or a silica compound and a titanium compound is fired at a temperature of 600°C or lower (preferably, at a temperature of about 500°C), to obtain a complex oxide carrier.

Next, tungsten oxide is supported on the complex oxide carrier and fired at a temperature substantially equal to an operating temperature, or at a temperature higher than the operating temperature by about 50°C (for example, 650°C), thereby obtaining a powdered catalyst.

The reason why tungsten oxide as the active component is supported and then fired at a temperature substantially equal to the operating temperature, or at a temperature higher than the operating temperature by about 50°C is that a crack or the like in the catalyst can be prevented with respect to temperature changes, by firing tungsten oxide at a temperature substantially equal to the operating temperature.

As the method of manufacturing the complex oxide carrier, for example, any one of coprecipitation (CP) method, homogeneous precipitation (HP) method, and sol-gel method can be used.

An example of the coprecipitation method is described below. Titanium chloride (TiCl₄) aqueous solution and zirconium oxychloride aqueous solution were mixed in a predetermined ratio (for example, TiO₂:ZrO₂=90 to 50:10 to 50 (weight ratio). The temperature was set to a room temperature. Ammonia aqueous solution was dropped into the mixed aqueous solution until pH became 7, to form coprecipitated slurry. The slurry was stirred and matured for approximately a predetermined time, and then filtered and washed to obtain a cake. The obtained cake was dried at 110°C, fired for a predetermined time at a temperature equal to or lower than 600°C (for example, 500°C), thereby obtaining TiO₂·ZrO₂ complex oxide. The complex oxide was designated as complex oxide I. Ammonium paratungstate was dissolved in methylamine aqueous solution so that WO₃ was in a predetermined amount (equal to or larger than 8 parts by weight) per 100 parts by weight of the complex oxide I, which was then dropped on powdered complex oxide, and kneading and drying were repeated so that tungsten oxide (WO₃) was supported thereon. The carrier was fired for a predetermined time at a temperature substantially equal to the operating temperature (for example, 650°C), thereby obtaining a powdered catalyst. After an obtained powder was immobilized by a 30-ton compression molding machine, for example, the powder was pulverized so that particle diameters thereof were in a range of from 2 to 4 millimeters, for example, and then sieved to obtain a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas.

According to the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas of the present invention, as described in Examples described later, the number of molecular layers of WO₃ is preferably set to five or less and the support quantity of WO₃ is set to 8% by weight in a weight ratio of the entire catalyst. Therefore, even when high-temperature denitration is continued at a flue gas temperature of 500°C or higher, a bonding force with a carrier of WO₃ can be properly maintained, and volatilization can be suppressed while maintaining a high NOx removal performance.

In the present invention, flue gas at a temperature of 500°C or higher, preferably 600°C or higher, is caused to circulate in the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas, to decompose and remove nitrogen oxide in flue gas. The shape of the NOx removal catalyst is not particularly limited, and for example, a honeycomb shape, a shape obtained by stacking the honeycomb shape, a shape obtained by filling a granular catalyst or the like can be used. Particularly, a catalyst having a honeycomb shape is preferable. The size of the honeycomb catalyst can be arbitrarily determined according to flue gas characteristics, flow rate or the like, and is not particularly limited. For example, an external shape of a flue gas inlet can be, for example, 10 to 150 millimeter square, and a length L thereof can be about 100 to 500 millimeters.

In a NOx removal process using the catalyst according to the present invention, nitrogen oxide can be removed according to the equation (1) described above by the NOx removal catalyst. In a processing method of flue gas discharged from various combustion devices, discharged flue gas is delivered to a NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas and undergoes the NOx removal process, in which ammonia or urea is added thereto as a reducing agent on an upstream side of the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas.

Flue gas that can be processed in the present invention is not particularly limited, and the present invention can be applied to processing of flue gas containing nitrogen oxide. The present invention is preferably used for processing of flue gas discharged from a boiler in a thermal power plant or a factory that burns fuel such as coal or heavy oil, or flue gas discharged from a heating furnace in a metal factory, an oil refinery, a petrochemical plant or the like, and in particular, the present invention is preferably used for processing of gas discharged from a thermal power plant and a gas turbine.

Examples

Examples that represent effects of the present invention are explained below; however, the present invention is not limited thereto.

Example 1

Tetraethyl orthotitanate (Ti(OC₂H₅)4) aqueous solution and tetraethyl orthosilicate (Si(OC₂H₅)₄) aqueous solution were mixed in a weight ratio of TiO₂:SiO₂=95:5, and this mixed aqueous solution was heated to 80°C. The mixed aqueous solution was hydrolyzed for 2 or more hours, and an obtained product was filtered and washed to obtain a cake. The obtained cake was dried at 110°C, fired for 5 hours at 500°C, thereby obtaining TiO₂·SiO₂ complex oxide. The TiO₂·SiO₂ complex oxide was designated as the complex oxide I. Ammonium paratungstate was dissolved in methylamine aqueous solution so that WO₃ was 16 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the complex oxide I, which was then dropped on powdered complex oxide, and kneading and drying were repeated so that tungsten oxide (WO₃) was supported thereon. This carrier was fired for 3 hours at 650°C, thereby obtaining a powdered catalyst I. After an obtained powder was immobilized by a 30-ton compression molding machine, the powder was pulverized so that particle diameters thereof were in a range of from 2 to 4 millimeters, and sieved to obtain a NOx removal catalyst I for high-temperature flue gas.

Example 2

Titanium chloride (TiCl₄) aqueous solution and zirconium oxychloride aqueous solution were mixed in a weight ratio of TiO₂:ZrO₂=50:50. The temperature was a room temperature. Ammonia aqueous solution was dropped into the mixed aqueous solution until pH became 7, to form coprecipitated slurry. The slurry was stirred and matured for 5 hours at 80°C, filtered and washed to obtain a cake. The obtained cake was dried at 110°C, fired for 5 hours at 500°C, thereby obtaining TiO₂·ZrO₂ complex oxide. The TiO₂·ZrO₂ complex oxide was designated as complex oxide II. Ammonium paratungstate was dissolved in methylamine aqueous solution so that WO₃ was 16 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the complex oxide II, which was then dropped on powdered complex oxide, and kneading and drying were repeated so that tungsten oxide (WO₃) was supported thereon. The carrier was fired for 3 hours at 650°C, thereby obtaining a powdered catalyst II. After an obtained powder was immobilized by a 30-ton compression molding machine, the powder was pulverized so that particle diameters thereof were in a range of from 2 to 4 millimeters, and sieved to obtain a NOx removal catalyst II-1 for high-temperature flue gas.

Examples 3 and 4

The same operation was performed as in the Example 2 except that ammonium paratungstate was dissolved in methylamine aqueous solution so that WO₃ was 24 parts by weight and 12 parts by weight, respectively, per 100 parts by weight of the complex oxide II, to obtain NOx removal catalysts II-2 and II-3 for high-temperature flue gas, respectively.

Comparative examples 1 and 2

16% by weight and 9.5% by weight of tungsten oxide (WO₃) were respectively supported on a titanium oxide carrier to obtain comparative catalysts 1 and 2 of Comparative examples 1 and 2.

Comparative example 3

The same operation was performed as in the Example 1 except that ammonium paratungstate was dissolved in methylamine aqueous solution so that WO₃ was 8 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the complex oxide I, to obtain a comparative catalyst 3.

An intensity-ratio test method was performed by measuring an intensity ratio of Ti and W by using a X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. A shape of an analysis sample used for an evaluation test of NOx reduction activity was directly used. A NOx removal efficiency test was performed by evaluating the NOx reduction activity under a condition shown in Table 2. The NOx removal efficiency was obtained according to the following equation: <maths id="math0003"><math display="block"><mi>NOx removal efficiency</mi><mfenced><mo>%</mo></mfenced><mo>=</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><mi>Inlet</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mfenced><mi>NO</mi><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>NO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mfenced><mo>-</mo><mi>outlet</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mfenced><mi>NO</mi><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>NO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mfenced></mfenced><mo>×</mo><mn>100</mn><mo>/</mo><mi>inlet</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mfenced><mi>NO</mi><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>NO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mfenced></math><img file="EP2384807A1_D0003.tif" /></maths> Catalyst composition, WO0₃/TiO₂ intensity ratio, number of molecular layers of WO₃, and the NOx removal efficiency are shown in Table 1.

<tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><table frame="all"><title>Table 1</title><tgroup cols="11"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="23mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="23mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="23mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="21mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="22mm" /><colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="21mm" /><colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="22mm" /><colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" colwidth="23mm" /><colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" colwidth="22mm" /><colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" colwidth="22mm" /><colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" colwidth="22mm" /><thead><row><entry morerows="1" valign="top" /><entry morerows="1" valign="top">Catalyst No.</entry><entry morerows="1" valign="top">Catalyst Composition</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col5" align="left" valign="top">Specific surface area (m²/g)</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col7" align="left" valign="top">WO₃/TiO₂ intensity ratio</entry><entry namest="col8" nameend="col9" align="left" valign="top">Number of molecular layers of WO₃</entry><entry namest="col10" nameend="col11" align="left" valign="top">NOx removal efficiency (%@600°C)</entry></row><row><entry valign="middle">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="middle">800°C × after 15h</entry><entry valign="middle">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="middle">800°C × after 15h</entry><entry valign="middle">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="middle">800°C × after 15h</entry><entry valign="middle">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="middle">800°C × after 15h</entry></row></thead><tbody><row><entry>Example 1</entry><entry>Catalyst I</entry><entry>16wt.%WO₃ /TjO₂-SiO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">114.4</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">36.2</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">0.53</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1.2</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">3.8</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">79.0</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">61.4</entry></row><row><entry>Example 2</entry><entry>Catalyst II-1</entry><entry>16wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂-ZrO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">91.0</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">48.2</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">0.70</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1.5</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">2.9</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">76.7</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">64.0</entry></row><row><entry>Example 3</entry><entry>Catalyst II-2</entry><entry>24wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂-ZrO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">65.1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">46.3</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">0.70</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">3.5</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">4.9</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">73.4</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">60.1</entry></row><row><entry>Example 4</entry><entry>Catalyst II-3</entry><entry>12wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂-ZrO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">77.0</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">41.8</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">0.70</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1.2</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">2.4</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">70.7</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">60.0</entry></row><row><entry>Comparative example 1</entry><entry>Comparative Catalyst 1</entry><entry>16wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">72.0</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">15.2</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">0.43</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">1.9</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">9.1</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">69.8</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">33.2</entry></row><row><entry>Comparative example 2</entry><entry>Comparative Catalyst 2</entry><entry>9.5wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">62.2</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">-</entry></row><row><entry>Comparative example 3</entry><entry>Comparative Catalyst 3</entry><entry>8wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂-SiO₂</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">60.0</entry><entry align="center" valign="middle">_</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

<tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><table frame="all"><title>Table 2</title><tgroup cols="2"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="35mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="51mm" /><tbody><row><entry>Catalyst temperature</entry><entry>500°C, 550°C, 600°C,</entry></row><row><entry>Catalyst shape</entry><entry>Crushed item in pressure molding</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry>Gas composition</entry><entry>NO_x:54ppm</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry>(Remnant: N₂)</entry><entry>O₂:14vol%(dry)</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry /><entry>CO₂:4.8vol%(dry)</entry></row><row rowsep="0"><entry rowsep="1" /><entry rowsep="1">H₂O:8.8vo1% (wet)</entry></row><row><entry>Gas flow rate</entry><entry>NH₃:54ppm 220 liters N/h</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

From the results shown in Table 1, in the catalysts I, II-1 to II-3 according to the Examples 1 to 4, any considerable decrease in the NOx removal efficiency was not observed in a high-temperature NOx removal efficiency test performed at 800°C after a lapse of 15 hours (the flue gas temperature: 600°C). On the other hand, in the comparative catalyst 1, a considerable decrease in the NOx removal efficiency was observed in the high-temperature NOx removal efficiency test performed at 800°C after a lapse of 15 hours (600°C). In these Examples, there was no increase in the number of molecular layers of tungsten oxide (WO₃). However, in the Comparative example 1, there was an increase in the number of molecular layers of tungsten oxide (WO₃), and the NOx removal efficiency decreased.

Changes in an initial NOx removal efficiency with respect to changes of a flue gas temperature are shown in Table 3, using the catalyst II-1. When the flue gas temperature was increased from 500°C to 600°C, a decrease in the efficiency of about 6% was observed.

<tables id="tabl0003" num="0003"><table frame="all"><title>Table 3</title><tgroup cols="5" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="22mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="38mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="14mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="14mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="14mm" /><thead><row><entry valign="top">Catalyst No.</entry><entry valign="top">Catalyst composition</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" rowsep="1" align="left" valign="top">NOx removal efficiency (%)</entry></row></thead><tbody><row><entry rowsep="1" /><entry rowsep="1" /><entry rowsep="1">500°C</entry><entry rowsep="1">550°C</entry><entry rowsep="1">600°C</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry>Catalyst II-1</entry><entry>16wt.%WO₃ /TiO₂-ZrO₂</entry><entry>82.8</entry><entry>81.8</entry><entry>76.7</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

Example 5

In the Example 2, complex oxide II-1 before firing was immersed in 100 milliliters of 1 mole percent sulfuric acid aqueous solution, dried, and then fired. Thereafter, WO₃ was supported thereon, evaporated to dryness, followed by firing for 3 hours at 650°C, thereby obtaining catalyst III, which had undergone sulfuric acid processing. The catalyst composition, W0₃/TiO₂ intensity ratio, number of molecular layers of WO₃, and the NOx removal efficiency of the catalyst III are shown in Table 4. By performing sulfuric acid processing, high-temperature endurance was also improved. It can be considered that sulfate radicals infiltrated into complex oxide particles to suppress sintering.

<tables id="tabl0004" num="0004"><table frame="all"><title>Table 4</title><tgroup cols="8"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="20mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="28mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="19mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="20mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="19mm" /><colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="20mm" /><colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="20mm" /><colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" colwidth="21mm" /><thead><row><entry morerows="1" valign="top">Catalyst No.</entry><entry morerows="1" valign="top">Catalyst Composition</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="left" valign="top">WO₃/TiO₂ intensity ratio</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="left" valign="top">Number of molecular layers of WO₃</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="left" valign="top">NOx removal efficiency (%@600°C)</entry></row><row><entry valign="top">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="top">800°C × after 15 h</entry><entry valign="top">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="top">800°C × after 15 h</entry><entry valign="top">Initial stage</entry><entry valign="top">800°C × after 15 h</entry></row></thead><tbody><row><entry>Catalyst III</entry><entry>16wt.%WO₃ /SO₄/TiO₂-ZrO₂</entry><entry align="center">1</entry><entry align="center">0.64</entry><entry align="center">1.9</entry><entry align="center">1.6</entry><entry align="center">77.3</entry><entry align="center">70.0</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

Industrial Applicability

As described above, the NOx removal catalyst for high-temperature flue gas according to the present invention is particularly suitable for reducing and removing nitrogen oxide contained in high-temperature gas discharged from a thermal power plant and a high-temperature boiler, for example.