Machined component manufacturing method for enhanced low cycle fatigue life
6 claims: 1 independent, 5 dependent
- 1A method of manufacturing a component (10) comprising the steps of:providing a substrate surface (12) having damaged compound particles (16);and removing the damaged compound particles (16) from the substrate surface (12) without producing a substantial amount of new damaged compound particles (16) in the substrate surface (12), including mechanically working the substrate surface (12) with an abrasive media;wherein: the providing step includes machining a substrate surface (12);wherein the damaged compound particles (16) include brittle compound particles susceptible to cracking during said machining, including at least one of a cracked carbide and a cracked oxide;and wherein the removing step includes arranging the substrate surface (12) and the abrasive media in a barrel, suspended in a liquid and removing a predetermined amount of the substrate surface (12) to produce a new substrate (12) surface free from additional damaged compound particles (16) wherein said predetermined amount corresponds to an approximate median size of the damaged compound particles (16).
16 paragraphs in 4 sections, as filed
BACKGROUND
0001This disclosure relates to a manufacturing method for improving low cycle fatigue life of machined components, such as aircraft components.
0002Many machined components, such as disks and rotating shafts of gas turbine engines, are made from superalloys, such as nickel. Some nickel superalloys include brittle compound particles, such as carbides or oxides.
0003Typically, these superalloy components are machined subsequent to a casting or forging process. A cutting tool can damage or crack the carbides and/or oxides during machining, which provides weakened sites at which fatigue cracks may initiate. Fatigue cracks result in reduced low cycle fatigue life that can significantly limit the service life of the component. Superalloy components having carbides and/or oxides that have been low-stress ground exhibit improved low cycle fatigue life. Low-stress grinding is quite time consuming and expensive. Furthermore, low-stress grinding can only be utilized on smooth, readily accessible surfaces and cannot be used on inaccessible features, such as notches, which are typical on most aircraft superalloy components. Accordingly, fatigue cracks may initiate at inaccessible, machined surfaces of superalloy components despite the use of low-stress grinding.
0004What is needed is improved low cycle fatigue life for superalloy components with brittle compound particles and machined surfaces.
0005<patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="JP06145783B"><text>JP-06145783</text></patcit> discloses a treatment for steel for pressure vessels according to which nonmetallic inclusions on a surface are detected, mechanically crushed and removed by using a macro-Vickers and a micro-Vickers hardness meter. <patcit id="pcit0002" dnum="US2005263171A"><text>US-2005/263171</text></patcit> discloses finishing processes for improving the fatigue life of metal components which allow to remove scales, oxides, burrs and other defects that tend to reduce the fatigue life of metal components.
SUMMARY
0006According to the present invention there is provided a method of manufacturing a component, such as a superalloy aircraft component, as set forth in claim 1.
0007In one example, the damaged compound particles are removed with an abrasive media. For example, at least 0.0006 inch (0.01524 mm) of substrate surface is removed by the abrasive media. The method results in a machined substrate surface free from damaged compound particles.
0008These and other features of the disclosure can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0009<ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li><figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> is a simplified view of a machined substrate surface having damaged compound particles.</li><li><figref idref="f0001">Figure 2</figref> is a simplified view of the substrate surface shown in <figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> subsequent to removing the damaged compound particles.</li><li><figref idref="f0001">Figure 3</figref> is an example manufacturing method of removing damaged compound particles from a machined substrate surface.</li></ul>
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
0010<figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> depicts a component 10 having a substrate surface 12 that has been machined. The component 10 may be an aircraft component, such as a rotating disk or shaft or compressor rear seal of a gas turbine engine. In one example, the substrate is a nickel superalloy, such as Inconel 718. The substrate includes brittle compound particles, such as carbides or oxides, dispersed throughout, which is typical of such superalloys. Another example substrate is any steel of the type typically used in shafts and disks. Such steels typically include carbides.
0011Tool marks 14 produced by cutting tools during the machining process damage or crack the carbides and/or oxides 16. Example machining processes are lathe turning, broaching, reaming, boring and milling. A typical median size of a cracked carbide may be approximately 0.0006 - 0.0008 inch (0.01524 mm - 0.02032 mm). A large cracked carbide may be around 0.001 inch (0.0254 mm). The site of damaged compound particles can provide a location for early initiation of fatigue cracks, resulting in reduced low cycle fatigue life. Post-machining processing is desirable to counter the effects of the damaged compound particles on low cycle fatigue life.
0012<figref idref="f0001">Figure 2</figref> illustrates the component 10 with a finished surface 18 in which the damaged carbides and/or oxides 16 have been removed. In one example, a predetermined amount of the substrate surface 12 is removed subsequent to machining in an amount that corresponds to an average damaged or cracked compound particle size. In the example of cracked carbides, at least 0.0006 inch (0.01524 mm) is removed so that a new substrate surface substantially free of new damaged compound particles is produced.
0013An example manufacturing method 20 is shown in <figref idref="f0001">Figure 3</figref>. The substrate surface is machined, as indicated at block 22, which results in damaged compound particles, as indicated at block 24. The machined substrate surface is finished to remove the predetermined amount of substrate, as indicated at block 26. The substrate surface finishing process according to the invention is to mechanically work the substrate surface with an abrasive media. In one example, the component is placed in a barrel, such as a Sutton barrel, with an abrasive media, such as No. 10 fused aluminum oxide. In one example, the abrasive media and component is suspended in water containing a detergent and a corrosive inhibitor. In one example process, the barrel is vibrated at about 320 oscillations per minute for about ninety minutes to remove at least 0.0006 inch (0.01524 mm) of substrate surface. The abrasive media removes the damaged compound particles and some of the substrate without producing any amount of new damaged compounds, as represented by block 28.
0014Parameters such as the speed, shape and size of the media and the duration for which the component is exposed to the media affect the amount of material removed from the substrate surface. The desired parameters can be empirically determined for each application. Removing the damaged compound particles eliminates sites that are susceptible to fatigue cracks, which extends the low cycle fatigue life of the component.
0015According to the invention the substrate surface is removed in an amount corresponding to the median damaged intermetallic compound (e.g. oxide or carbide) particle size.
0016Although example embodiments have been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of the claims.
Contents4
1 sheet
Sheet 1
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office |
|---|---|---|
| JP6145783A | Cites | Japan |
| JP2001335833A | Cites | Japan |
| US4026779A | Cites | United States of America |
| US2005263171A1 | Cites | United States of America |
| Piearcey B.J., Smashey R.W.: "The Carbide Phases in Mar-M200" Transaction of the Metallurgical Society of AIME vol. 239, April 1967 (1967-04), pages 451-457, XP002570260 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.aimehq.org/search/docs/Volu me%20239/239-097.pdf> [retrieved on 2010-02-22] | Non-patent | – |
| Lacaze, J. and Hazotte, A.: "Directionally Solidified Materials: Nickel-Base Superalloys For Gas Turbines" Textures and Microstructures vol. 13, 1990, pages 1-14, XP002570261 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ tsm/1990/601079.pdf> [retrieved on 2010-02-22] | Non-patent | – |
6 members in 2 offices; this record represents the family
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27755108 | United States of America | A | |
| 277551 | United States of America | – | |
| US20080277551 | – | – | – |
| 277551 | – | – | – |
Members6
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP2189239A1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| US2010126635A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US8209845B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2012315179A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP2189239B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| US8728391B2 | United States of America | B2 |
70 legal events, as 9 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Change of applicant/patenteeR081 | R081 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registeredP01 | P01 | EP | |
| Change of applicant/patenteeR081 | R081 | DE | |
| Change of applicant/patenteeR081 | R081 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Change of applicant/patenteeR081 | R081 | DE | |
| Change of representativeR082 | R082 | DE | |
| Change of representativeR082 | R082 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Patent lapsedLapsedMM4A | MM4A | IE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| No opposition filed against granted patent, or epo opposition proceedings concluded without decisionGrantedR097 | R097 | DE | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| No opposition filed against granted patent, or epo opposition proceedings concluded without decisionGrantedR097 | R097 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Invalidated european patentMG4D | MG4D | LT | |
| Discontinued in the netherlands as no translation has been filedVDEP | VDEP | NL | |
| Deletion acc. to par. 5 (withdrawal of the translation of the ep patent)MK05 | MK05 | AT | |
| Dpma publication of mentioned ep patent grantGrantedR096 | R096 | DE | |
| European patents granted designating irelandGrantedFG4D | FG4D | IE | |
| Reference to at number (ep patent validated in austria)REF | REF | AT | |
| European patent takes effect as a national patent in ch/liEP | EP | CH | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Intention to grant announcedINTG | INTG | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAX | AX | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 2189239
- Publication, DOCDB
- 2189239
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP2189239
- Application
- 9252671
- Application, DOCDB
- 09252671
- Application, EPODOC
- EP20090252671
Titles3
- German
- Verfahren zur Herstellung einer Maschinenkomponente für erhöhte Lebensdauer bei niederzyklischer Ermüdung
- English
- Machined component manufacturing method for enhanced low cycle fatigue life
- French
- Procédé de fabrication de composant usiné pour améliorer la durée de vie de fatigue oligocyclique
Classification
- CPC, 3
- B23P9/00
- B23P6/002
- B24B19/14
- IPC, 2
- B23P9 00
- B24B31 00
Designated states1
- Contracting states, 1
- Türkiye
