Highly oxidation resistant hard coating materials for cutting tools
Abstract
An inventive workpiece features on at least parts of its surface a wear resistant hard coating comprising the following composition Al1-a-b-c-dCraXbSicBdZ, where x is at least one element from Nb, Mo, W or Ta; Z is one element or compound from N, C, CN, NO, CO, CNO; and 0.2<=a<=0.5; 0.01<=b<=0.2; 0<=c<=0.1; 0<=d<=0.1. Further a PVD process for depositing such a wear resistant coating is disclosed whereby at least one workpiece is installed in a vacuum coating system and said system is operated in a low pressure argon atmosphere utilizing at least two metal or metal alloy targets with at least temporarily addition of a reactive gas.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 14 July 2025, 1.2 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
10 claims: 3 independent, 7 dependent
- 1Claims of equivalent WO 2006005217 A2 Claims :1. A workpiece having a surface wherein at least parts of said sur¬ face are coated with a wear resistant hard coating comprising a coating of the following composition Ali- a - b - c - d Cr a X b Si c B d Z, where X is at least one element from Nb, Mo, W or Ta;Z is one element or compound from N, C, CN, NO, CO, CNO;and 0.
- 7PVD process for depositing at least one Ali_ a _ b _ c _ a Cr a X b Si c B d Z film on a workpiece, where X is at least one element from Nb, Mo, W or Ta,- Z is one element or compound from N, C, CN, NO, CO, CNO;and 0.2 <= a <= 0.5 ;0.01 <= b <= 0.2 ;0 <= c <= 0.1 ;0 <= d <= 0.1, whereby at least one workpiece is installed in a vacuum coating system and said system is operated in a low pressure ar- gon atmosphere utilizing at least two metal or metal alloy tar¬ gets with at least temporarily addition of at least one reactive gas, applying at the substrate a negative voltage.
Independent claims3
60 paragraphs in 3 sections, as filed
Description of equivalent WO 2006005217 A2
0001High Oxidation Resistant Hard Coating for Cutting Tools
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
0003The invention relates to a hard coating with extremely high oxida- tion resistance for a body that especially requires wear-protection.
0004It further relates to a coated tool, especially a high speed steel, a cemented carbide or a cubic boron nitride (CBN) coated cutting tools such as end mills, drill bits, cutting inserts, gear cutters and hobs. In consequence the invention also relates to coated wear resistant machine parts, in particular mechanical components such as pumps, gears, piston rings, fuel injectors, etc.
RELATED ART
0006Document A (JP 2002-337007), titled "hard coating coated tool" de- scribes the presence of fine amorphous CrAlSiN particles in a CrAlN coating which provides high oxidation resistance to the cutting tool. Document B, EP 1 422 311 A2 refers to a Al-rich CrAlSi (NBCO) coating having a NaCl-type crystal structure. JP 2002-337005, docu¬ ment C, describes a tool with an abrasive-resistant coating wherein at least one layer is made of CrAlN and another layer is made of a sort of CrSiBN. Document D, JP 2002-160129 describes a tool with an interlayer made of Ti, Cr, Si or Al-based material which is then coated with an AlCrN based hard film. JP 10-025566, document E, re¬ fers to a CrAlN coating with properties in high temperature oxida- tion resistance. The scientific article (document F) by Lugscheider et al. in Surface & Coatings Technology v.174-175 pp. 681-686 (2003) refers to investigations of mechanical and tribological properties of CrAlN + C thin coatings deposited on cutting tools, especially to CrAlN+C coatings with low friction tribological performance re- ported to have a beneficial effect for cutting and drilling applica¬ tions. The proceedings of the 4th Int'l Conf. THE Coatings in Manuf. Engineering pp. 111-120 (2004), by Uhlmann et al. report new devel¬ opments for high performance cutting tools (document G) . The paper refers to the deposition of multilayered CrN/ TiAlN, CrMoTiAlN and CrAlVN hard coatings. In [A] , [B] and [C] , hard anodic coatings are composed with at least one of silicon or oxygen containing CrAl based system layer which is responsible for the increase in the degree of hardness and the in- crease in high temperature oxidation resistance, reducing the rate of abrasive and oxidation wear on cutting tools. In [D], a base ma¬ terial is first coated with a layer of Ti, Cr, Si or Al and an AlCrN hard layer is formed on top. The metal intermediate layer is used as a buffer deformation absorption layer to even out any deformation due to the difference in thermal expansion between coating and the tool. In [E], a hard AlCrN coating is formed by physical vapor depo¬ sition from Al and Cr targets on a reactive nitrogen atmosphere, the heat resistance of the AlCrN system is reported up to 1000<sup>2</sup>C. In [F] , the authors report an improvement in the mechanical properties (such as hardness and increased Young's modulus) and frictional characteristics by combining CrAlN coating with a hard carbon sur¬ face. It is claimed such combinations could be successful in drill¬ ing and milling applications. In [G], the authors refer to multi¬ layer CrAlVN coatings deposited as layers combining chromium, alumi- num and vanadium metal sources by the ion plating process. As a re¬ sult, the machining performance of the deposited coatings did not reach the level obtained by standard TiAlN coatings.
0007SUMM-VRY OF THE INVENTION The invention targets at low wear resistance layers of TiCN, TiAlN, AlTiN, and similar hard coatings especially in high speed cutting applications where high temperatures are involved, difficult to ma¬ chine materials applications (for example, machining of tool steels, austenitic stainless steel, aluminum and titanium alloys) . Despite the beneficial effects of known CrAlN coatings with high temperature applications, alternatives should be found which might give an even better performance for certain applications with tools, especially with cutting and forming tools or components, especially with com¬ ponents used for combustion engines.
0008The performance of CrAlN coatings could be optimized by the addition of transition metals like niobium, tantalum, molybdenum and/or tung¬ sten. Optionally metalloids like silicon and/or boron can be added to further increase the hardness and decrease the wear of tools and mechanical components running under the described extreme condi- tions. The new family of coatings increases the service life of tools and reduces the costs of replacing mechanical components and/or re-sharpening expensive cutting tools by influencing chip formation process, consequently, an increased productivity would be reached due to higher possible cutting speeds.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
0010Figure 1: Sketch of the crystal structure of aluminum-chromium- transition metal nitride. Figure 2: X-ray diffraction pattern and lattice parameter of alumi- num-chromium-transition metal nitrides.
0011Figure 3: X-ray diffraction pattern and texture coefficient of alu¬ minum-chromium-molybdenum nitrides.
0012Figure 4: Sketches of the microstructures that are achievable by aluminum-chromium-transition metal nitrides: (a) polycrystalline (b) textured (c) nanocomposite.
0013Figure 5: Hardness and residual stress measurements for aluminum- chromium-transition metal nitrides.
0014Figure 6: Secondary ion mass spectrometer depth profiles: (a) typi¬ cal oxidized surface (b) poor oxidized surface (c) optimal oxidized surface.
0015Figure 7: High temperature wear-resistance ball-on-flat tests for aluminum-chromium-transition metal nitrides.
0016DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The alloyed-AlCrN coatings were obtained using an industrial Balzers rapid coating system (RCS) machine. This machine contains a low voltage arc discharge arrangement that allows for rapid heating and etching of the substrates which promotes high adhesion strengths. The apparatus is also equipped with six deposition sources which can be chosen from sputtering, cathodic arc and nano-dispersed arc jet sources. During the deposition, a negative bias voltage can be ap¬ plied to the substrate tools or components by using a fixed or a pulsed bias power supply The entire description and drawings of the RCS equipment can be found under US appl. no. US 2002/0053322.
0017To deposit the inventive coatings on a variety of workpieces, the previously cleaned workpieces were mounted, according to their di¬ ameter, either on double-rotating or, for diameters under 50 mm, on triple-rotating substrate carriers. Radiant heaters installed in the coating system heated up the workpieces to a temperature of about 500° C and, with a bias voltage of -100 to -200 V applied in an Ar- gon atmosphere at a pressure of 0.2 Pa, the workpieces sufaces were subjected to etch polishing with Ar-ions. The coating system is op¬ erated in a low pressure argon atmosphere utilizing at least two metal or metal alloy targets with at least temporarily addition of at least one reactive gas, applying at the substrate a negative voltage.
0018A workpiece, for the purpose of this invention, is being defined as having a body made from steel, high speed steel, hardmetal, cemented carbide, or any other suitable metal or ceramics. An example for a workpiece may be a tool for high temperature and/or dry tooling op¬ eration. Examples for tools are a cutting tool, a drill, a reamer, a broach, an insert, a hob, a mill, an endmill, a ball nose mill, a forming tool, a die casting mold, an injection mold, a stamping tool, a deep drawing tool, a forging die. Besides tools the inven- tion can be applied to components, e. g. for heavy duty, high tem¬ perature, insufficient lubrication and/ or dry running conditions. Such components comprise a tappet, a component of the valve train, a bucket tappet, a valve lever, a rocker arms, a pin, a piston pin, a roller follower pin, a bolt, a component of a fuel injection sys- tern, an injection needle, a gear, a pinion gear, a plunger, a piston ring. This listing is not terminating, further embodiments and ap¬ plications of the invention are possible and can be defined by a man skilled in the art.
0019In the experiments relating to this invention, two of the six depo¬ sition sources were used to include a ductile TiN adhesion layer (around 0.3 urn thick) . Some of the experiments were repeated using miscellaneous adhesion layers like Ti, Cr and CrN and a similar per¬ formance was reached. The remaining four sources were utilized to deposit the main functional layer using customized sintered alumi¬ num-chromium-transitional metal targets and the ion plating deposi- tion process. Also, in some of the experiments, the main functional layer was co-deposited by combining an AlCr alloyed with a transi¬ tion metal and an AlCr containing silicon or boron. During the depo¬ sition, the sources were run at a power of 3.5 kw while the partial pressure of the nitrogen gas was maintained at approximately 3.5 Pa. Also, a substrate bias of -100V was applied during the deposition to enhance the ion bombardment process on the substrates. The deposi¬ tion time was always adjusted so that for all different coating com¬ positions, the thickness of the functional layer was around 4 μm. A total of ten customized compositions for the sintered targets were prepared. The aluminum atomic content for all the targets of all the compositions was fixed at 70%. One customized composition was com¬ posed of 30 at. % Cr, eight customized compositions were composed of 25 at.% Cr and 5 at.% of Ti, Y, V, Nb, Mo, W, Si and B, respec¬ tively, and one composition was composed by 20 at.% Cr and 10 at.% Mo. The composition of the coatings correlated proportionally to the compositional analysis of the targets used (as it is shown in exam¬ ples 1 through 4) .
0020The desired cubic crystal structure for an AlCrN coating containing small amounts of alloying elements is represented in figure 1. In a pure AlCrN coating, the NaCl (Bl) crystal structure is composed of anion nitrogen atoms 1 as well as of aluminum 2 and chromium 3 atoms that compete for the available cation positions. In theory, with the addition of small amounts of a different transition metal (TM) 4, the lattice structure should get slightly distorted due to the dif- ference in atomic size and electronegativity. Also, the amount of solid solution solubility would be limited because most transition metals have much lower capacity than chromium to stabilize the Bl structure in the presence of large amounts of aluminum atoms. An¬ other factor affecting the solubility of solute TM atoms is the atomic radius difference between the TM and aluminum and chromium which should not be larger than 15% to achieve real solid solution strengthening. Indeed, depending on the nature of the transition metal alloy utilized solute atoms may restrict or not the movement of dislocations due to a resulting lattice distortion effect. The x-ray diffraction patterns and measured lattice parameters of a variety of AlCr-TM-N coatings are shown in figure 2. With the excep- tion of AlCrYN, the coatings showed a distinct Bl structure similar to the one expected for cubic AlCrN. This fact underscores the im¬ portance of the atomic radius and electronegativity of the alloying element not only on the solubility of the solute TM atoms but on the structural phase stability of the overall crystal structure. So, the differences in the measured lattice parameters can indeed provide us unique information about the structural effects of transition metal doping. The XRD experiments show that in the case of AlCrTiN and AlCrVN, the lattice parameter is slightly larger but similar to pure AlCrN. However, in the case of AlCrNbN and AlCrMoN, the lattice has slightly expanded (around 0.02 A) while maintaining a Bl crystal structure. However, in the case of AlCrYN, AlCrHfN and AlCrZrN, the TM's are expected to have very small solubility due to their rela¬ tively large atomic size. In this case, the result is an amorphisa- tion of the microstructure, as shown in figure 2 for AlCrYN. Another effect of transition metal doping into an AlCrN Bl-structure can be the development of a (200) texture during film growth. This is what occurred, for instance, with the XRD pattern for AlCrNbN (figure 2) which shows a (200) preferred orientation in comparison to the more polycrystalline structure exhibited by pure AlCrN. In figure 3, the diffraction ratio QI (defined as the ratio of the dif¬ fraction intensity for the (200) plane with respect to the diffrac¬ tion intensity of the (111) plane) is shown for the AlCrN and for two AlCrMoN compositions. Increasing the molybdenum content in an AlCrN with a Bl-structure resulted on higher QI ratios. Controlling the texture and structure of a protective hard film is, technologi¬ cally, very desirable because the shape of the stress field varies significantly from one application to the next. Also, unlike ref. [B] , here the preferred orientation is predominantly controlled by the stoichiometry of the coatings. The main structural arrangements that can be achieved by the compositions claimed in this invention are represented schematically in figure 4. In Figure 4 (a), a poly¬ crystalline film composed of randomly oriented crystallites 6 are grown on top of a cemented carbide or a steel substrate 5. A second possibility is that a textured film is grown on a substrate 5, being the portion of crystallites oriented in a particular plane 8 is sev¬ eral factors greater than the disoriented ones 9. The third possi- ble microstructural arrangement (figure 4 (c) ) can be achieved by co-depositing a metalloid (either Si or B) leading to the formation of covalently bonded nitrides and to the creation of a separate amorphous or semi-crystalline phase 12 that surrounds the crystal¬ lites 11 with the resulting further increase in hardness. Hardness tests of the deposited hard layers were conducted with a Fischerscope HlOO depth-sensing microhardness instrument using a test load of 50 iriN. In addition, the residual stress was calculated by measuring the curvature of thin planar steel substrates by the three point bend test before and after the deposition. The plot in figure 5 shows the values obtained for a variety of AlCrXN composi¬ tions. Results in figure 5 indicate a beneficial strengthening ef¬ fect when low amounts of Nb, Mo and W are alloyed into AlCrN without any further increase in the residual stress of the coating. This surprising mechanical behavior can be in part explained by the mechanisms of solid solution hardening and the solubility of these elements into Bl-AlCrN observed in our experiments as explained above.
0021Another important coating property in high speed or high feed cut¬ ting applications and in machining of austenitic stainless steels and titanium and nickel alloys is the resistance of a coating to oxidation at high temperatures and the characteristics of the third body layer that forms between coating and workpiece material during cutting that can influence the chip formation process. To investi¬ gate the oxidation behavior of the alloyed AlCrN coatings, annealing experiments in flowing air during one hour at 900<sup>2</sup>C were carried out. These experiments were followed by secondary ion mass spec¬ trometer depth profile analysis of the oxidized surface layers. Fig¬ ure 6 (a) illustrates the depth profile for a typical oxidation be¬ havior of a standard AlCrN coating with the formation of both chro- mium and aluminum oxides. This typical behavior was exhibited not only by the unalloyed AlCrN coating but by the AlCrTiN coating as well. Nevertheless, some of the alloyed AlCrXN coatings had a ten- dency to form mostly chromium oxides as it can be inferred from fig¬ ure 6 (b) . This indicates a poor oxidation resistance behavior since chromium oxides are generally weaker and less resistant to corrosion than aluminum oxides, and therefore they can be easily removed dur- ing cutting and/or molding processes. This oxidation behavior was observed in AlCrYN and AlCrVN coatings. On the other hand, AlCrNbN, AlCrMoN, and AlCrWN coatings showed a more optimal oxidation behav¬ ior (shown in figure 6(c)), where the amount of aluminum in the outer oxidized layer is similar to the aluminum content of the unoxidized part. This indicates the formation of stiff passive alu¬ minum oxides which can be very desirable in many cutting applica¬ tions.
0022Since the temperature of application of the new improved AlCrXN coatings is meant to be high, the wear resistance of the deposited layer was studied using a ball-on-disc test using a hard alumina ball counterface at high temperature and measuring the wear on the coating after a predetermined number of cycles. In figure 7, the wear rate of a variety of AlCrXN coatings is shown in comparison to TiAlN, AlTiN and AlCrN. The results also indicate that AlCrWN have the lowest wear of the set, even lower than the one corresponding to the pure AlCrN coating.
0023Based on the mechanical test results that were just presented, the behavior of AlCr based coatings can be further improved by the al¬ loying of Nb, Mo, W or Ta. In other words, by including transition metals from group Vb and VIb being heavier than chromium. The best results can be reached when the atomic concentration of these ele¬ ments is between 2 and 10 percent of the metallic part, however an atomic concentration as low as 1 percent and as high as 20 percent would be possible. The presence of these alloying elements ulti¬ mately ensures good solubility, an increased hardness, and an opti¬ mal high temperature oxidation behavior. This decreases the abra¬ sive, diffusion and oxidational wear of coated mechanical components and cutting tools at high temperatures. Similar results were also reached by the addition of small amounts of metalloids like silicon and/or boron and should also consequently be reached by analogous alloyed carbides, carbonitrides, carbon oxides, etc. Hence, the ac¬ tual invention refers to novel coatings and corresponding coated tools and components, having the coating the following global compo¬ sition:
0024I Ali_<sub>a</sub>_<sub>b</sub>_<sub>c</sub>_a. C-C<sub>a</sub> Xb Sx<sub>c</sub> Ba Z
0025Where:
0026X is at least one element from Nb, Mo, W, Ta; Z means N, C, CN, NO, CO, CNO; 0.2 <= a <= 0.5
00270.01 <= b <= 0.2 0 <= c <= 0.1 0 <= d <= 0.1
0028It is further possible to deposit gradient coatings for instance with an Al-content increasing toward the surface, either by using two types of targets with different Al/Cr ratios or, starting with a Cr and Cr and or Cr/N bonding layer, bridging about a progressive change in layer composition for instance by a continous or stepwise adjustment of the corresponding target output in a coating chamber equipped with both Cr and AlCr targets. The important factor for in¬ dustrial application of this type of of coatings is the ability to reporducibly adjust the process parameters essentially over the en¬ tire progression of the coating process and thus the entire thick¬ ness of the film. Minor compositional fluctuations occuring for in¬ stance on a single- or multiple rotation substrate carriercan be ad¬ ditionally utilized for producing a nanostructure over part or all of the thickness of the lyaer, i. e. for lamination in the nano or micrometer range. Example 1: Milling of Tool Steel - roughing
0029Cutting tool: end Mill HSS roughing, diameter D = 10mm, Number of teeth z = 4
0030Work piece: Tool Steel, X 40 CrMoV 5 1, DIN 1.2344 (36 HRC)
0031Cutting parameter:
0032Cutting speed v<sub>c</sub> = 60 m/min (S = 1592 1/min) ,
0033Feed rate fz= 0.05 mm/U (f = 318.4 mm/min)
0034Radial depth of cut a<sub>e</sub> = 3 mm
0035Axial depth of cut a<sub>p</sub> = 5 mm Cooling: Emulsion 5% Process: down milling
0036Tool life criterion: Momentum shut down (correlates with width of flank wear land VB > 0,3 mm)
0037<img file="EP1771602A2_D0001.tif" />
0038denotes state of the art coatings. <sup>c</sup>: denotes comparative examples
0039Example 1 shows the increased tool lifetime in meters of AlCrN based coatings compared to industrially used TiCN, TiAlN and AlTiN coat- ings. AlCrNbN, AlCrWN and AlCrMoN can be very beneficial when ap¬ plied to a ductile type substrate like high speed steel because they provide a surface of high hardness and an adequate adhesion. Example 2: Drilling Tool Steel
0040Cutting tool: Drill HSS (S 6-5-2), Diameter D = 6 mm Work piece: Tool Steel X 210 Cr 12, DIN 1.2080 (230HB) Cutting parameter:
0041Cutting speed v<sub>c</sub> = 35 m/min
0042Feed rate f = 0,12 mm
0043Drill hole depth z = 15 mm, blind hole Cooling: Emulsion 5%
0044Tool life criterion: Momentum shut down (correlates with width of edge wear VBc > 0,3 mm
0045<img file="EP1771602A2_D0002.tif" />
0046*: denotes state of the art coatings. <sup>c</sup>: denotes comparative examples
0047Example 2 shows the comparison of various AlCrXN coatings in HSS coated drills. Main tool life criterion is the standardized number of drilled holes over the coatings thickness until a predetermined maximum momentum is reached. The best coefficient of performance was shown by Nb,W and Mo alloyed AlCr-based coatings. Example 3: -Milling low alloyed steel - semi finishing Cutting tool: end mill carbide, diameter D = 8 mm,
0048Number of teeth z = 3
0049Work piece: carbon steel Ck45, DIN 1.1191 Cutting Parameter:
0050Cutting speed v<sub>c</sub> = 400 m/min
0051Feed speed v<sub>f</sub> = 4776 mm/min
0052Radial depth of cut a<sub>e</sub> = 0,5 mm
0053Axial depth of cut a<sub>p</sub> = 10 mm Cooling: Emulsion 5% Process: down milling Tool life criterion: width of flank wear land VB = 0,12 mm
0054<img file="EP1771602A2_D0003.tif" /> *: denotes state of the art coatings. <sup>c</sup>: denotes comparative examples
0055Example 3 shows a comparison of the tool life of coated cemented carbide end mills during finishing of plain carbon steel. While standard industrially used layer systems, such as TiCN, TiAlN and AlTiN coatings show a high flank wear after a tool life of If = 150 m, tools coated with coatings' combinations based on the formula All-a-b-c-d Cra Xb SicZ exhibited significantly lower wear. These results indicate that Ali-<sub>a</sub>-<sub>b</sub>-<sub>c</sub>_<sub>a</sub> Cr<sub>a</sub> X<sub>b</sub> Si<sub>c</sub> Z coatings can adequately resist the high induced thermal impacts of high speed machining processes. Example 4: - Milling of austenitic stainless steel - roughing
0056Cutting tool: end mill carbide, Diameter D = 10 mm, number of teeth z = 4 Work piece: austenitic stainless steel X 6 CrNiMoTi 17 12 2, DIN 1.4571 Cutting parameter:
0057Cutting speed v<sub>c</sub> = 67 m/min Feed rate f<sub>z</sub> = 0,033 mm Radial depth of cut a<sub>e</sub> = 6 mm
0058Axial depth of cut a<sub>p</sub> = 9 mm Cooling: Emulsion 5% Process: down milling
0059Tool life criterion: width of flank wear land VB = 0,2 mm
0060<img file="EP1771602A2_D0004.tif" />
0061* : denotes state of the art coatings.
0062Example 4 shows the comparison in tool life of coated cemented car¬ bide end mills against stainless steel for four industrially used hard layer systems. Machining of stainless steel is a very difficult process due to its high toughness of this material, tendency to work harden and to adhere to the tool. The best results in terms of tool life were reached using AlCrNbN, AlCrMoN and AlCrWN coatings. This increased tool life could be related to both an increase in hardness at high temperatures and the good oxidation behavior exhibited with the use of Nb, Mo and W alloyed AlCrN systems, consequently increas¬ ing the wear resistance.
Contents3
4 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4
23 members in 15 offices
Priority claims9
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 588084P | United States of America | – | |
| 58808404 | United States of America | P | |
| 58808404 | United States of America | P | |
| 2005000404 | Switzerland | W | |
| 2005000404 | Switzerland | W | |
| 588084P | – | – | – |
| CH2005000404 | – | – | – |
| US20040588084P | – | – | – |
| WO2005CH00404 | – | – | – |
Members23
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2569860A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| WO2006005217A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| WO2006005217A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| EP1771602A2This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| KR20070043834A | Republic of Korea | A | |
| MX2007000405A | Mexico | A | |
| CN101048528A | China | A | |
| JP2008505771A | Japan | A | |
| BRPI0513216A | Brazil | A | |
| ZA200609948B | South Africa | B | |
| US2008318062A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| CN101048528B | China | B | |
| EP1771602B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| PT1771602E | Portugal | E | |
| AT498711T | Austria | T | |
| ATE498711T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE602005026392D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| ES2361281T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| PL1771602T3 | Poland | T3 | |
| JP4861319B2 | Japan | B2 | |
| KR101204184B1 | Republic of Korea | B1 | |
| US8318328B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| CA2569860C | Canada | C |
89 legal events, as 16 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patent expired because of reaching the maximum lifetime of a patentExpiredMK | MK | NL | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Expiry of rightR071 | R071 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapse because of not paying annual feesLapsedMM01 | MM01 | AT | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Ep patent has lapsedLapsedEUG | EUG | SE | |
| Ep patent expiredExpiredMAE | MAE | FI | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Announcement of lapse in spainLapsedFD2A | FD2A | ES | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Fee paymentPLFP | PLFP | FR | |
| Lapsed because of non-payment of the annual feeLapsedMM | MM | BE | |
| Fee paymentPLFP | PLFP | FR | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Fee paymentPLFP | PLFP | FR | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent lapsedLapsedMM4A | MM4A | IE | |
| No opposition filed against granted patent, or epo opposition proceedings concluded without decisionGrantedR097 | R097 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Filing of the translation of the text of european patentsAG4A | AG4A | HU | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Translation of ep patentT3 | T3 | PL | |
| Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extensionLTIE | LTIE | EP | |
| Definitive protectionFG2A | FG2A | ES | |
| Translation filed for an european patent granted for nl, confirming art. 52 par. 1 or 6 of the patents act 1995GrantedT3 | T3 | NL | |
| Translation of granted ep patentGrantedTRGR | TRGR | SE | |
| Ep patent valid in romaniaEPE | EPE | RO | |
| Dpma publication of mentioned ep patent grantGrantedR096 | R096 | DE | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| European patents granted designating irelandGrantedFG4D | FG4D | IE | |
| Translation is availableAVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATIONSC4A | SC4A | PT | |
| European patent takes effect as a national patent in ch/liEP | EP | CH | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)RIN1 | RIN1 | EP | |
| Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)RIN1 | RIN1 | EP | |
| Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)RIN1 | RIN1 | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)RAP1 | RAP1 | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)DAX | DAX | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)RIN1 | RIN1 | EP | |
| Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)RIN1 | RIN1 | EP | |
| Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)RIN1 | RIN1 | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 1771602
- Publication, DOCDB
- 1771602
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP1771602
- Application
- 5758488
- Application, DOCDB
- 05758488
- Application, EPODOC
- EP20050758488
Titles3
- German
- HOCH OXIDATIONSBESTÄNDIGE HARTE BESCHICHTUNGSMATERIALIEN FÜR SCHNEIDWERKZEUGE
- English
- HIGHLY OXIDATION RESISTANT HARD COATING MATERIALS FOR CUTTING TOOLS
- French
- REVETEMENT DUR A HAUTE RESISTANCE A L'OXYDATION POUR OUTILS DE COUPE
Classification
- CPC, 6
- C23C14/0641
- C23C14/06
- C23C14/0635
- C23C14/0664
- C23C30/00
- C23C30/005
- IPC, 3
- C23C30 00
- C23C14 06
- C23C14 32
Designated states1
- Contracting states, 1
- Türkiye