Bicycle suspension systems
Abstract
This record has no abstract on file.
Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 24 September 2024, 2 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
10 claims: 4 independent, 6 dependent
- 1Claims of equivalent WO 2005030564 A2 What is claimed is:1. A compressible linkage suspension system for a rear axle of a bicycle rear wheel comprising controlled axle path, said path allowing for a range of anti-squat curves, and said anti-squat curves beginning within a range of 50 percent of a theoretical 100 percent value, transitioning towards a lower range of anti-squat curves at a higher end of said path.
- 4A compressible linkage suspension system for a bicycle rear wheel comprising means for achieving an anti-squat response.
- 6A compressible linkage suspension system for a bicycle rear wheel comprising means for easing of suspension reaction to bumps.
- 9A compressible linkage suspension system for a bicycle rear wheel comprising a spring damper unit, a frame member which supports a bicycle seat and which further supports said spring damper unit, and a pair of triangular brackets supporting said spring damper unit, wherein said spring damper unit partakes in pivotal traverses to achieve an anti-squat response.
Independent claims4
5 paragraphs in 1 section, as filed
Description of equivalent WO 2005030564 A2
BICYCLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates generally to improvements for bicycles, the improvements more particularly residing in a link suspension system that can more effectively be tuned to balance forces in the rear suspension of the bicycle, all as will be better understood as the description proceeds.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Take into consideration the system described by US patent 6,206,397 Bl. This link suspension system claims linkage arrangement and a defined range of rear wheel axle paths for a suspension bicycle. The axle path claimed and shown in the patent art can be manipulated into an S shape, or a converging C shape. The theory behind this is that during the lower part of the suspension travel, the wheel axle will travel at an increasing rate, away from the bottom bracket center. By achieving this, the designers hope to increase the resistance to rear suspension compression during the beginning of the travel. This resistance to suspension compression is called anti-squat in popular engineering text. As the '397 patent is examined, it becomes obvious that the inventors overlooked several key factors that must be evaluated in order to obtain a clear understanding of anti-squat and how it pertains to a suspension system. The system as described in the '397 patent feature pro-squat in the beginning of the suspension travel, and a rising rate of anti-squat as the suspension cycles through the end of its travel. In practice bicycles designed using the system described in the '397 patent feature inefficient acceleration in the beginning of the suspension travel, where efficient acceleration is needed most. As background to understanding the present invention it is to be noted that a link bicycle suspension system is a defined specific range of kinematical linkages which can be used to produce a tactical rear axle path. Each combination of linkages can be tuned to balance forces in the rear suspension of the bicycle in ways that no previous system has been able to. Variations of the linkage layout can shift the balance of forces to give distinct advantages for suspension systems used for differing applications. The suspension system allows a designer to manipulate the rear axle path in relation to the bicycle frame.
Manipulating axle paths has a huge impact on the performance of the rear suspension, since axle path governs several key aspects of suspension performance. It is an object of the present invention to achieve a desired variable amount of anti- squat as the rear suspension cycles through its travel. Manipulating rear axle path in a tactical manner using a linkage system allows the designer to obtain a desired range of anti-squat curves. A preferred anti-squat curve is one that features a higher amount of anti- squat in the beginning of the suspension travel, and a lesser amount as the suspension cycles compressively through its travel. This anti-squat amount lessens with regard to the amount of spring force provided by a spring damper unit. In addition to this lessening anti- squat amount as the suspension compresses, the linkage arrangement is also designed to impart a minimal amount of feedback to the pedals as the suspension cycles. The preferred linkage arrangement also can be optimized so that a spring damper unit can be driven at a strategic leverage rate, furthermore reducing inefficient rear wheel movement. Also the linkage arrangement can be strategically placed so that the effect of braking force on rear wheel movement is minimized. The description of the invention which follows, together with the accompanying drawings should not be construed as limiting the invention to the example shown and describe, because those skilled in the art to which this invention appertains will be able to devise other forms thereof within the ambit of the appended claims. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a mode of adjusting bicycle rear wheel suspension according to the present invention; Fig. 2 is a partial perspective view of a bicycle component providing the rear wheel suspension; and Fig. 3 is a view similar to Fig. 2 on an enlarged scale.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION A link suspension system according to the present invention is embodied in a bicycle 10 having a body frame member 12 which extends from a handlebar 14 rearwardly downward at an angular orientation to a pedal mechanism 16 and is integral at juncture 18 to a vertically oriented frame member 20 which supports a bicycle seat 22. At the junction 18, a cylindrical configuration 24 is provided for journaling in rotation the rotor 26 of the pedal mechanism 16. Mounted to extend rearwardly of the frame members 12, 20 are an upper angularly oriented pair of supports 28 and 30 and lower horizontally pair of supports 32 and 34 which at respective ends 36 and 38 are attached to a rear wheel 40 for rotatably mounting of the rear wheel 40 to the bicycle. Just above the juncture 18 are spaced apart brackets 42 and 44 welded as at 46 to frame member 12 having aligned openings 48 for receiving therethrough bolt means 50 connecting thereto the bottom end 52 of a housing 54 of an internally mounted damper spring 56, the upper housing end 58 being connected to a pair of triangular brackets 60 and 62, in turn connected, as at 64, to cooperating openings 66 provided in rear wheel supports 32 and 34, the remaining bracket opening 72 being bolted to support bracket 74 and 76 welded, as at 78, to the seat support frame 20. Completing the link suspension system are brackets 80 and 82 connected at opposite ends 84 to cooperating openings 86 provided in the rear wheel supports 32 and 34 and at ends 88 to the cylindrical configuration 24. Referring to the diagrammatic illustration of Fig. 1, it will be understood that the interconnections at 48, 72, 76 enable the interconnected components to partake of a multitude of pivotal traverses, of which a significant pivotal traverse 90 implements axle path changes in a rear sprocket 92 of the rear wheel 40 contributing to a range 94 of rear wheel positions, all to the end of achieving a selected (1) extent of pressure feedback to the pedals, (2) an easing of suspension reaction to bumps, and (3) as known in the parlance of the art, multiple chainstay lengths. Thus, one well versed in the art is able by selection to tune the described combination of linkages to balance forces in the rear suspension of the bicycle as desired and as dictated by the end use of the bicycle and the terrain on which it is used. While the apparatus herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of attaining the objects and providing the advantages hereinbefore stated, it is to be understood that it is merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiment of the invention and that no limitations are intended to the detail of construction or design herein shown other than as defined in the appended claims.
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO03018392A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
| US2003090082A1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US6206397B1 | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
46 members in 11 offices
Priority claims7
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 669412 | United States of America | – | |
| 66941203 | United States of America | A | |
| 2004031390 | United States of America | W | |
| 669412 | – | – | – |
| US20030669412 | – | – | – |
| US2004031390 | – | – | – |
| WO2004US31390 | – | – | – |
Members46
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2005067806A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| US2005067810A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| AU2004276310A1 | Australia | A1 | |
| AU2004276314A1 | Australia | A1 | |
| CA2536779A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| CA2537049A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| CA2702879A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| WO2005030507A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| WO2005030564A2 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A2 | |
| WO2005030564A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| WO2005030564B1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | B1 | |
| WO2005030507A3 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A3 | |
| US7048292B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| EP1663767A2This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP1663768A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| US2006119070A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP1663767A4 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A4 | |
| US7128329B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| CN1871157A | China | A | |
| US2007024022A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| EP1663768A4 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A4 | |
| JP2007506618A | Japan | A | |
| JP2007506619A | Japan | A | |
| CN1964885A | China | A | |
| AU2004276310B2 | Australia | B2 | |
| AU2004276314B2 | Australia | B2 | |
| EP1939084A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP1939084A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| NZ545518A | New Zealand | A | |
| EP1663768B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT425073T | Austria | T | |
| ATE425073T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE602004019945D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| ES2324786T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| EP1939084B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT461104T | Austria | T | |
| ATE461104T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE602004026128D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| EP2186719A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| ES2342347T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| CA2536779C | Canada | C | |
| US7828314B2 | United States of America | B2 | |
| US2011115181A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| CN1964885B | China | B | |
| EP2186719A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| JP4955390B2 | Japan | B2 |
10 legal events, as the office reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Application refused18R | 18R | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSEDSTAA | STAA | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | |
| Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)DAX | DAX | |
| Supplementary search report drawn up and despatchedA4 | A4 | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI |
Numbers
- Publication
- 1663767
- Publication, DOCDB
- 1663767
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP1663767
- Application
- 4784985
- Application, DOCDB
- 04784985
- Application, EPODOC
- EP20040784985
Titles3
- German
- FAHRRADAUFHÄNGUNGSSYSTEME
- English
- BICYCLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS
- French
- SYSTEMES DE SUSPENSION POUR VELOS
Classification
- CPC, 10
- B60G5/00
- B60G21/045
- B60G2200/464
- B60G2204/143
- B60G2204/421
- B60G2204/422
- B60G2300/12
- B62K25/26
- B62K25/28
- B62K25/286
- IPC, 9
- B62K1 00
- B62K25 28
- B60G
- B60G3 02
- B60G5 00
- B60G21 045
- B62K
- B62K25 20
- B62K25 26
Designated states28
- Contracting states, 28
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Switzerland
- Cyprus
- Czechia
- Germany
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Spain
- Finland
- France
- United Kingdom
- Greece
- Hungary
- Ireland
- Italy
- Liechtenstein
- Luxembourg
- Monaco
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Poland
- Portugal
- Romania
and 4 moreShow fewer
- Sweden
- Slovenia
- Slovakia
- Türkiye