CAD modeling system and method
16 claims: 6 independent, 10 dependent
- 1A modeling system (100) for generating a three dimensional CAD model of a part (104), comprising:at least one camera (102);an image grabber (108) for capturing a two dimensional, 2D, image of the part (104) obtained from the at least one camera;at least one image processor (106) for breaking the 2D image into geometric elements;means for creating a three dimensional scanning scheme using the geometric elements;and a scanner (120) for scanning the part (104) using the three dimensional, 3D, scanning scheme to create a 3D image of the part (104);wherein the at least one image processor (106) is adapted to fit the scanned 3D image with the geometric elements to generate the model.
- 5The modeling system of any preceding claim, further comprising a memory (111) accessible by said at least one processor, wherein the memory (111) is adapted to store a geometric element standards library reflecting geometric element characteristics and wherein said at least one image processor is adapted to validate the geometric elements by referencing the library.
- 6The modeling system of any preceding claim, wherein said at least one image processor is adapted to further generate a correction matrix reflecting distortion between the 3D image and the geometric elements based on differences between the 3D image and the geometric elements, and wherein said at least one image processor is adapted to correct the 3D image based on the correction matrix.
- 7The modeling system of any preceding claim, wherein the scanner is a laser projector (120) for projecting a plurality of illuminated stripes on the part (104).
- 8The modeling system of any preceding claim, further comprising at least one movable platform (116) supporting at least one of said at least one camera (102) or the part (104) for moving said at least one camera (102) and the part (104) relative to each other.
- 9A method of generating a three dimensional CAD model of a part (104), comprising:capturing a two dimensional, 2D, image of the part (104);breaking the 2D image into geometric elements;creating a three dimensional, 3D, scanning scheme using the geometric elements;scanning the part using the 3D scanning scheme to create a 3D image of the part (104);and fitting the 3D image with the geometric elements to generate the model.
- 14The method of any of claims 9 to 13, wherein the 3D image comprises at least one point cloud, and wherein the matching step comprises:segmenting said at least one point cloud into a plurality of point cloud segments;and matching each of the plurality of point cloud segments with one of the geometric elements, and wherein the method further comprises merging the plurality of point cloud segments to generate the model.
Independent claims9
34 paragraphs, as filed
<u style="single">TECHNICAL FIELD</u>
0001The present invention relates to computer assisted design (CAD) system and methods, and more particularly to CAD systems and methods that create a CAD model of an existing object.
<u style="single">BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION</u>
0002Designing replacement parts, such as aircraft engine and helicopter airframe sheet metal parts, require accurate three-dimensional (3D) CAD models to provide an accurate tool path for machining the replacement parts. Ideally, the 3D CAD model precisely defines all the geometric elements in a given part, their dimensions and the connectivity relationships between them.
0003One known 3D CAD modeling technique involves measuring an existing master part and creating a CAD model manually from the measured dimensions. This manual process tends to be very time-consuming and error prone. Further, if the master part is distorted and/or has additional features like holes, slots, etc. on distorted surfaces, the manual process will introduce these errors into the model, making replacement parts produced from the model inaccurate and difficult to assemble onto existing parts.
0004Another known modeling technique creates a 3D CAD model by scanning the original paper drawings, which are two-dimensional (2D) projections. This is also a time-consuming, error-prone process because the drawings may not be accurate or complete and do not reveal connectivity relationships between features, making automation of the modeling process difficult. In cases where the original part has been modified onsite to solve an assembly problem, these modifications are often not reflected in the master drawing, making replacement parts made from the drawing unfit for proper assembly.
0005Yet another technique uses a scanning system normally used to reproduce complex surfaces like airfoil shapes. Scanning systems are particularly appropriate for sculpted, parametric surfaces. However, sheet metal parts are not sculpted surfaces, but are a combination of regular geometric surfaces (e.g., planes and cylinders) and are therefore less complex. Scanning systems employed in airfoil scanning will reproduce the geometries faithfully, including any distortions in the part. This results in a sculpted surface and not a regular geometric surface. Thus, the tool path produced using this method will be useful for machining sculpted surfaces and not for regular geometric surfaces because the tool path created is more complex and, paradoxically, more error-prone due to the distortions in the resulting model.
0006For example, a planar surface with even slight imperfections (e.g., a dented sheet metal plane) will result in a multi-faceted parametric surface because even minor imperfections on the surface being scanned are assumed to be part of the sculpted surface and therefore faithfully reproduced by a sculpted point cloud model. Thus, the scanning system requires a complex multi-axis machine to reproduce even simple surfaces. Deriving a simpler CAD model out of this to reproduce the standard geometric surfaces adds further complexity to the modeling process.
0007There is a desire for 3D CAD modeling system and method that can generate an accurate 3D model that is an exact replica of an original part while optimizing processing resources and time.
0008<patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="US20030014224A"><text>US2003/0014224</text></patcit> discloses a method to generate a 3D model of an urban area which is based on 2D aerial imagery and 3D elevation map. The 2D image is brocken into polygonal regions indicating the building outlines. The 3D model is then generated by considering that the buildings are rectangular boxes whose bases are the estimated outlines and whose heights are derived from the 3D elevation map.
0009The present invention is directed to a system and method for generating a 3D model of an object. According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a modeling system for generating a three dimensional (3D) CAD modul of a part as claimed in claim 1. The scanner adjusts its scanning process based on the feature-richness of the object, such as reducing the scanning speed if the object contains many geometric elements and features and increasing the scanning speed if the object is made of only a few simple geometric elements.
0010According to another aspect, there is provided a method of generating a three dimensional (3D) CAD model of a part as claimed in claim 9.
0011In one embodiment, the 3D stereoscopic image is compared with the possible geometric elements in the 2D image to detect distortions in the object. These distortions may then be automatically removed to ensure that the generated model does not duplicate the distortions but faithfully reflects the original design intent. Thus, the invention can generate a model that is a more accurate reproduction even compared to the original physical object from which the model is generated.
<u style="single">BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS</u>
0012<ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li><figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> is a representative block diagram illustrating a system according to one embodiment of the invention; and</li><li><figref idref="f0002">Figure 2</figref> is a flow diagram illustrating a method according to one embodiment of the invention.</li></ul>
<u style="single">DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS</u>
0013The invention is generally directed to a 3D modeling method and system that automatically creates a full 3D CAD model of regular featured geometry sheet metal items quickly and automatically. Unlike scanning systems for complex airfoil shapes, which interprets each point and creates a sculpted surface, this process automatically creates full CAD models that are the exact replica of the original regular geometry. This process also automatically corrects and compensates for distortions in the scanned surfaces, placing any holes and other localized features in the correct location in an undistorted surface in the generated model.
0014<figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> is a representative block diagram illustrating components of a modeling system 100 according to one embodiment of the invention. In one embodiment, the system 100 a 2D gray-tone vision system was integrated with a 3D scanning system. Generally, the system 100 avoids the extensive processing resources needed in currently-known modeling systems by creating a full 3D CAD model of an object by interpreting the object's shape as a combination of regular geometric surfaces rather than as a complex sculpted surface. To do this, the system first generates a two-dimensional (2D) grey-tone geometric map of the object. The 3D scanning system then scans the object and fits the scanned 3D points to the geometries noted in the 2D map. By fitting the 3D scanned data into the 2D geometric map, the inventive system and method can create a model for just the elements present, which is less time-consuming and a generates a more accurate reproduction compared to conventional methods while at the same time being able to automatically correct for any inaccuracies (e.g., distortions, warping, etc.) inherent in the objects.
0015The modeling system 100 itself includes one or more cameras 102, such as black and white CCD cameras, used to capture a profile of a object 104 to be modeled. The cameras 102 may be black-and-white cameras 102 and have a desired pixel resolution. The cameras 102 communicate with a computer 106, which can be any device that can process data. The cameras 102 send image data to an image grabber 108 in the computer 106, which captures the image taken from the cameras 102 and stores it as a 2D gray-tone image. An image processor 110 breaks the 2D gray-tone image from the image grabber 108 into its component geometric objects. In one embodiment, a memory 111 stores a geometric element standards library from which the image processor 110 can choose the geometric elements to match the 2D gray-tone image. In this, the standard image library includes planes (e.g., for part surfaces), arcs (e.g., for surface blending radii), cylinders (e.g., for bolt holes), lines (e.g., for part edges), along with other shapes that reflect all possible geometric elements that will be present in the object 104.
0016The system 100 also includes a 3D scanning system that scans the object and generates a 3D stereoscopic image (e.g., a point cloud). In one embodiment, the 3D scanner includes a laser projector 120 that projects a plurality of fine laser stripes onto the object 104. The cameras 102 then capture the images of the object 104 illuminated by the projected stripes and send this information to a second image processor 122, which generates a 3D stereoscopic image. Note that although this example has a first image processor 110 to process 2D gray-tone images and a second image processor 122 to process 3D stereoscopic images, the functions of these two processors 110, 122 may be carried out in a single image processor without departing from the scope of the invention.
0017Either the cameras 102 or the object 104 may be mounted on a movable platform 116 operatively coupled to the computer 106 so that they can be moved in a controlled manner. The image processor 110 takes the 2D gray-tone image information from the camera 102 and the 3D stereoscopic image and fits the points in the 3D stereoscopic image with the geometric elements obtained from the 2D gray-tone image to generate the final model in a manner that will be described in greater detail below.
0018<figref idref="f0002">Figure 2</figref> is a flow diagram illustrating a method carried out by the system shown in <figref idref="f0001">Figure 1</figref> according to one embodiment of the invention. In the first part of the method, the cameras 102 generate the 2D gray-tone image of the object to be modeled. Generally, from this and the library of possible surfaces the 2D system determines all the regular, geometric featured surfaces present and generates a rough geometry information and relationships present between the surfaces.
0019As shown in <figref idref="f0002">Figure 2</figref>, the process may include a calibration step that calibrates the cameras 102 for both 2D vision and 3D stereovision (block 200). In one embodiment, the calibration process includes calibrating each camera 102 for perspective transformation and calculating scaling factors, radial lens distortion, and transformation from the camera coordinate system to the part coordinate system. Camera calibration may be conducted using a known calibration target comprising, for example, a backlit glass plate containing a grid of precise squares. In one embodiment, a 3D-to-2D mapping transformation is generated using the grid corner coordinates by matching the corresponding measured camera coordinates for each corner of each square on the grid. A stereovision algorithm then uses this transformation to combine the camera coordinates for each pixel on each image to generate the 3D coordinate corresponding to that pixel.
0020After calibration, the cameras 102 and image grabber 108 capture 2D pixel data, forming a 2D gray-tone image representation of the object 104 (block 202). The image processor 110 then breaks down the 2D gray-tone image into its geometric elements (block 204) and validates the geometric elements against geometries in the standard image library (block 206). The geometric element breakdown and validation step fits the geometric elements present in the 2D gray-tone image against standard geometries in the library, resulting in the 2D geometry model. In one embodiment, the edge detection is conducted by noting the rate of change in light intensity levels at object boundaries and indicating a geometric boundary at a given location if the rate of change at that location is above a threshold value. A special filtering algorithm may be used to identify the boundaries between geometric elements in the 2D image. When the reflected light intensity falls off rapidly it marks an edge boundary; the 2D gray tone images are run through software filters to increase the contrast and to make the boundary demarcation easy and automatic. Uniform illumination of the object 104 during image capture ensures accurate detection of these boundaries.
0021Next, the system 100 uses the 2D geometry model in conjunction with the 3D scanning system to generate the final model. The system 100 uses the 2D geometry model to create a 3D scanning scheme based on the complexity and type of elements present in the model (block 208). For example, if the 2D geometry model reflects a feature-rich profile (e.g., if the object contains many holes and rapidly changing geometric profiles), the system 100 may modulate the 3D scanning speed so that it is slower to ensure that all of the features are captured. On the other hand, if the object surface is, for example, a simple plane with no additional features, the system 100 increases the speed of the scanning process.
0022Once the scanning scheme has been created (block 208), the image processor 110 creates a list of geometric elements present in the 2D geometry model so that it can later fit points obtained via the 3D scanning process to match the geometries (block 210). This is much faster than creating all possible geometries that will fit the points from scratch.
0023Next, the laser projector 120 projects a plurality of stripes onto the object 104 and the cameras 102 capture 3D stereoscopic images of the portions illuminated by the stripes (block 212). The second image processor 122 then calculates the 3D coordinates of the illuminated points using, for example, stereoscopic point-matching techniques (i.e., by matching points on each illuminated stripe on each camera screen to a corresponding point on the object 104) to generate a 3D stereoscopic image (e.g., a point cloud) of the object 104 (block 214).
0024To add more detail to the 3D stereoscopic image, the cameras 102 and the object 104 may be moved relative to each other in selected increments. The cameras 102 can therefore capture additional images based on the desired amount of detail in the point cloud geometry and/or the detail richness of the original object (block 216). The decision of whether to capture additional images and the scanning speed to be used is based on the 3D scanning scheme obtained in block 208. An object 104 having a large amount of detail, for example, may warrant more images than an object having a simple geometry and little detail. Regardless of the specific scanning scheme, the ultimate scanning speed and number of images is chosen so that the generated model reflects all of the details in the object 104 while optimizing time and processing resources. In one embodiment, the cameras 102 and/or the object may be moved so that they capture images of the object 104 at intermediate locations between previous stripe positions. A composite 3D stereoscopic image of the object 104 may then be obtained by stitching together the various images from each intermediate location of the captured 3D images, and this will have a point density commensurate with the detail richness of the original object.
0025Once all of the desired 3D stereoscopic images have been obtained, the second image processor 122 matches segments of the point clouds obtained via the 3D scanning process with the geometric elements obtained in the 2D imaging process (block 218). Note that this geometric element matching step does not require fitting parametric surfaces that accommodates all the points in the point cloud; instead, the image processor 122 merely fits the 3D stereoscopic images to the identified geometric elements via a reverse geometry creation system, which is a simpler process. The geometric elements provide guidance on how to segment the point clouds to fit them to the elements, forming an initial 3D model that matches the 3D stereoscopic images to the detected geometric shapes and the connectivity relationships between the shapes.
0026The constraints offered by the geometric elements causes the image processor 122 to automatically conduct stray point noise reduction, point density reduction, feature matching and feature sharpening in the 3D image of the object because the processor 112 will generally disregard points that do not conform to the geometric elements. In one embodiment, the 3D stereoscopic image is passed through point processing filters to remove outliers and then adjusted for proper point density to remove redundant points. The geometric elements ensure that the points in the 3D stereoscopic image are matched only to actual features in the object and not to the shapes (which may be inaccurate) that the point cloud in the 3D image suggest.
0027The 3D stereoscopic image processing system also automatically corrects any inaccuracies inherent in the object 104 (e.g., due to distortions in sheet metal parts) using the 2D and 3D images (block 220). In one embodiment, the image processor 122 compares the original 3D stereoscopic image points it has fitted into the 2D geometric elements and determines the amount of distortion based on the difference between the actual surface location as reflected by the points in the 3D stereoscopic image and the nominal geometrical surface using the geometric characteristics for the given surface. For example, the processor 122 may calculate the flatness of a planar surface, the cylindricity of a cylindrical surface, etc, and compare the actual object geometries as represented by the point cloud with the ideal geometric characteristics of the elements forming the object. Based on the differences between the measured profile and its corresponding geometric elements, the processor 122 calculates a distortion profile and a correction matrix.
0028Based on this surface distortion information and the correction matrix parameters, the image processor 122 corrects the captured 2D gray-tone image and 3D stereoscopic image data to create a distortion-free model and precise coordinates for all the features in the modeled object (block 222). For example, a distorted hole on a distorted plane surface will be transformed by the correction matrix so that the true hole lies on the proper location on the undistorted surface. The circularity error of the distorted hole and the straightness error of the distorted plane in the scanned geometry are the parameters that give the correction matrix for this feature combination. The correction matrix calculates point to point how each scanned point in the distorted geometry has to be corrected to bring it to the true shape. Other correction parameter combinations are obtained from the allowable geometry combinations for all the geometries present in the library. The processor 122 then merges all the 3D stereoscopic image surface information and all of the geometry elements to form a completed, precise 3D model (block 224).
0029By starting with a 2D geometric element framework to construct a 3D model, the inventive method and system not only generates a precise 3D model of a given object, but can actually compensate for distortions and imperfections in the original object by fitting the detected 3D stereoscopic image with the geometric elements forming the object. Further, treating the object as a combination of geometric elements rather than as a sculpted parametric surface also compensates for distortions and imperfections while at the same time reducing the processing resources used to generate the image. As a result, the invention creates a more precise 3D CAD model, in less time, than currently known methods.
0030It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that the method and apparatus within the scope of these claims be covered thereby.
2 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN104054079A | Cited by | China | Search report |
| US2003014224A1 | Cites | United States of America | – |
| HAALA N., BRENNER C.: "Laser data for virtual landscape generation" WORKSHOP ON MAPPING SURFACE STRUCTURE AND TOPOGRAPHY BY AIRBORNE AND SPACEBORNE LASERS, 9 November 1999 (1999-11-09), XP002360165 La Jolla, CA, USA | Non-patent | – | – |
| TANGELDER J W H; ERMES P; VOSSELMAN G; VAN DEN HEUVEL F A: "CAD-based photogrammetry for reverse engineering of industrial installations" COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, vol. 18, 1 July 2003 (2003-07-01), pages 264-274, XP002360166 | Non-patent | – | – |
7 members in 4 offices; this record represents the family
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 738403 | United States of America | – | |
| 73840303 | United States of America | A |
Members7
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP1544800A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| US2005135670A1 | United States of America | A1 | |
| JP2005202945A | Japan | A | |
| EP1544800A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| EP1544800B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE602004019623D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| US8050491B2 | United States of America | B2 |
28 legal events, as 4 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| Designation fees paidAKX | AKX | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAX | AX | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAX | AX | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 1544800
- Application
- 42577775
Titles3
- German
- System und Verfahren zur CAD-Modellierung
- English
- CAD modeling system and method
- French
- Système et procédé de modélisation CAO
Classification
- CPC, 4
- G06T17/10
- G06T2200/08
- G06T7/521
- G06T7/593
- IPC, 8
- G06T17 00
- G06T7 00
- G01B11 245
- G06F17 50
- G06T1 00
- G06T3 00
- G06T17 10
- G06T19 00
Designated states3
- Contracting states, 3
- Germany
- France
- United Kingdom
