Method for restarting a weaving loom after stopping and/or changing the warp chain position
Abstract
A method for restarting a weaving loom after adjustment operations implying the shifting of the warp chain is disclosed, comprising the steps of stopping the loom, acquiring a first image of a fabric portion in a position fixed in respect of the loom, carrying out the adjustment and resetting the initial mechanical conditions of the loom, acquiring a second image of the fabric in said position fixed in respect of the loom, comparing the first and the second image against each other to establish the measure of any existing textile phase displacement, performing an adjustment on the mechanical members of the weaving loom on the basis of said measure of the weaving phase displacement to reset the initial textile condition and, finally, resetting the loom.
Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 10 November 2023, 2.9 years ago.
- Priority and filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
6 claims: 3 independent, 3 dependent
- 1Method for restarting a weaving loom upon an adjustment intervention implying the shifting of the warp chain, characterised in that , after stopping the loom the following steps are performed:(a) acquiring a first image of a fabric portion in a position fixed in respect of the loom;(b) carrying out the adjustment intervention and resetting the initial mechanical conditions of the loom;(c) acquiring a second image of the fabric in said position fixed in respect of the loom;(d) comparing the first and the second image against each other to establish the measure of any existing textile phase displacement;(e) carrying out an adjustment on the mechanical members of the weaving loom on the basis of said measure of textile phase displacement to reset the initial textile condition;(f) restarting the loom.
- 5Method as claimed in any of the preceding claims, wherein said fabric portion is framed in an area measuring about 2x2 cm.
- 6Method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein said images are digital images and said comparison step is performed through mathematical algorithms.
Independent claims3
29 paragraphs, as filed
The present invention relates to a method for controlling the starting position of a weaving loom after stopping, in particular a method for restarting the weaving loom after stopping in view of an adjustment.
As known, during weaving loom operation it may be necessary to occasionally stop the loom for various reasons and then to restart it after performing specific operations. In particular circumstances, while the loom is stationary, operations are carried out that temporarily alter the position of the warp chain on the loom and/or the relative positions of warp, let-off motion cylinder and fabric-tensioning roller.
In any case, every time the warp chain is temporarily moved backwards or forwards, it is necessary to recreate the initial conditions before restarting the loom, i.e. bring all the weaving members and the yarn in the exact position they were in before the loom was stopped: if not, when restarting at a steady speed, conspicuous defects will appear in the fabric.
According to the prior art, in order to bring the loom back to the initial conditions, the rotation angle described by the main shaft of the loom during down time (i.e. during the time between two steady conditions) is tracked, for example by means of an encoder, to be later reproduced backwards by the main motor.
Ideally, this approach should achieve the desired result, especially thanks to the inherent control accuracy of modern encoders and electric motors.
However, since the warp yarns and weft threads have a certain elasticity and the fabric resting on the loom bench is subject to a remarkable friction - amongst other things, of a very different scale in dynamic or semi-static conditions, respectively - reference to the encoder only on the mechanical transmission shaft is not sufficient to reset the initial condition. As a matter of fact, although the initial "mechanical" condition of the loom is actually reset by the encoder only, the initial "textile" condition of the warp chain may be lost due to the yarn elastic and friction forces.
In such circumstances the reed beating line, upon restart after adjustment operations, may no longer fall exactly on the margin or the leading edge of the cloth as it was completed when the loom stopped.
As is understandable, the phase displacement between initial "mechanical" condition and initial "textile" condition may also be of a minimal extent (being the larger, the more elastic the yarn is), but in any case it inevitably causes defects in the fabric (commonly referred to as "overhead beating" defects and "open space in cloth") which it is desirable to eliminate.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to supply a method for restarting the loom which allows to correctly reset the conditions of the warp chain even after an adjustment operation, in particular a method allowing to reset even the initial "textile" conditions independently from reference to the initial "mechanical" conditions.
Such object is achieved by the method described in the accompanying main claim.
Other inventive features of the method are described in the dependent claims.
Further features and advantages of the method according to the invention will in any case be clearer from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the same, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing which represents a diagram of a weaving loom according to the invention.
As can be seen in the drawing, the warp chain runs from the let-off cylinder 1 to the fabric-tensioning roller 2, passing through the weaving area where the weaving machine is located. In particular, the position in which the fabric is actually originated corresponds with the reed beating line, i.e. the line along which the last weft thread inserted is beaten onto the cloth.
According to the invention, in the weaving loom, in the bench area onto which the fabric runs, is installed an image acquisition device or camera 3 capable of taking up at least a portion of the fabric travelling in front of a window frame which is fixed with respect to the loom reference, preferably a small window frame of limited size, advantageously smaller than 10x10 cm and, for example, measuring about 2x2 cm.
The image of the fabric, preferably in a digital format, is then managed and processed, for example keeping only a thin linear scanned image thereof in the warp direction.
The image of the fabric is acquired at preset times by a digital taking up system, for example the acquisition device described in the Italian patent application simultaneously filed by the same Applicant.
The method of the invention provides that, when the loom is stopped for the required adjustments, a digital image of the framed fabric portion is acquired through the taking up device: such digital image is kept at least temporarily in a memory area, for example either in a RAM of a suitable integrated circuit, or in a RAM or a hard disk of a computer connected to the acquisition device.
Once the operator has completed his operations on the warp chain, the loom is brought back to the conditions in which it was at the time of stopping, using known methods, for example causing the loom motor to reproduce backwards the rotation angle detected by an encoder integral with the main shaft.
Afterwards, the loom control system instructs the taking up device to acquire a second image of the framed fabric portion, which is compared against the first image stored in the memory area.
The comparison between the two images occurs by means of suitable numerical algorithms so that it may be established whether there is a perfect match - except for a tolerance factor set beforehand - or whether the two images are so different that adjustment is required. In this last case, from the numerical comparison of the two digital images, the amount and direction of correction is obtained by which the warp chain must be shifted to bring the leading edge of the cloth back to exactly the same position it was in when the loom was stopped.
The numerical comparison between the two digital images can be performed in a variety of ways, some of which are immediately available to a person skilled in the field of computerised anticounterfeiting systems.
A possible comparison method, for example, consists in identifying the position of light intensity peaks in each image compared against a fixed reference, for example the edge of the acquisition window frame of the taking up device: from the difference in the peak positions in the two images and from the enlarging rate at which the fabric image is acquired, it is possible to determine the amount and direction by which the loom must be moved forwards or backwards, with respect to the mechanical condition existing at the time when the loom was stopped, in order to reset the initial "textile" condition.
Similar results can be achieved through an analysis of virtual interference fringes obtained from the overlapping of the two acquired images, fringes which give an immediate measure of the phase shift between the two images.
The measure of the adjustment, processed by the central control system of the loom on the basis of the comparison of the two images and transmitted to the loom motors, can be slightly larger than that calculated strictly on the basis of the phase shift existing between the two images, for example to take into account the elasticity of the actual warp chain and the remarkable friction existing between the cloth and the bench in nearly static conditions. Alternatively, the adjustment can be carried out through two or more iterative steps between which the image comparison phase is repeated.
Advantageously, the fabric portion whose image is acquired lies in a position as close as possible to the leading edge of the cloth, so as to increase accuracy when resetting the initial conditions: in fact, this avoids residual positioning errors deriving from the elasticity of the cloth portion between the acquisition window frame and the beating line.
Once the desired initial "textile" condition is reset, the control system provides to restart the loom.
Furthermore, according to the method of the invention, after resetting the initial "textile" condition through the adjustment intervention determined by the comparison of the fabric images, even the initial "mechanical" condition is reset again: in this latter step the yarn-specific elasticity and the existing friction against the loom bench ensure that the obtained initial "textile" condition is not lost again.
With the method according to the invention the set objects are thus achieved, since the method allows to reset - after loom stopping and adjustment intervention affecting a displacement of the warp chain - not only the initial "mechanical" condition, but also - most importantly - the initial "textile" condition.
It is understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiment described above, which is a mere non-limiting example of the scope of the invention, but that a number of variants are possible, all within the reach of a skilled person in the field, without departing from the scope of the invention.
Every citation, both waysCites: the store holds 8 of 9
| Document | Relation | Office | Category | Cited during | Relevant claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106937046A | Cited by | China | – | Search report | – |
| US4582095A | Cites | United States of America | X | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| US4582095A | Cites | United States of America | X | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| DE486590C | Cites | Germany | A | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| DE486590C | Cites | Germany | A | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| US5520224A | Cites | United States of America | A | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| US5520224A | Cites | United States of America | A | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| CH668997A5 | Cites | Switzerland | X | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| CH668997A5 | Cites | Switzerland | X | Search report | 1,2,4 |
| PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 016, no. 269 (C - 0952) 17 June 1992 (1992-06-17) | Non-patent | – | – | Search report | – |
7 members in 4 offices
Priority claims2
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03425726 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A | |
| EP20030425726 | – | – | – |
Members7
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP1529862A1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| EP1529862B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT361385T | Austria | T | |
| ATE361385T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE60313619D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| ES2287442T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| DE60313619T2 | Germany | T2 |
58 legal events, as 8 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patent expired because of reaching the maximum lifetime of a patentExpiredMK | MK | BE | |
| Expiry of rightR071 | R071 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Announcement of lapse in spainLapsedFD2A | FD2A | ES | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Definitive protectionFG2A | FG2A | ES | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents actLapsedNLV1 | NLV1 | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| New agentNV | NV | CH | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| European patents granted designating irelandGrantedFG4D | FG4D | IE | |
| European patent takes effect as a national patent in ch/liEP | EP | CH | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| Designation fees paidAKX | AKX | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAX | AX | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 1529862
- Publication, DOCDB
- 1529862
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP1529862
- Application
- 3425726
- Application, DOCDB
- 03425726
- Application, EPODOC
- EP20030425726
Titles3
- German
- Verfahren zum Wiederanlaufen einer Webmaschine nach einem Stillstand und/oder einer Änderung der Position der Kette
- English
- Method for restarting a weaving loom after stopping and/or changing the warp chain position
- French
- Procédé de redémarrage d'un métier à tisser après un arrêt et/ou un changement de position de la chaîne
Classification
- CPC, 3
- D03J1/007
- D03D51/002
- D03D51/007
- IPC, 1
- D03D51 00
Designated states2
- Contracting states, 1
- Türkiye
- Extension states, 1
- North Macedonia