Method and apparatus for increasing receiver immunity to interference

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

I. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

0001The present invention relates to radio communications. More particularly, the present invention relates to improving a communication receiver's immunity to interference.

II. DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

0002There are presently multiple types of cellular radiotelephone systems operating. These systems include the advanced mobile phone system (AMPS) and the two digital cellular systems: time division multiple access (TDMA) and code division multiple access (CDMA). The digital cellular systems are being implemented to handle capacity problems that AMPS is experiencing.

0003All the cellular radiotelephone systems operate by having multiple antennas covering a geographic area. The antennas radiate into an area referred to in the art as a cell. The AMPS cells are separate and distinct from the CDMA cells. This makes it likely that the antenna for one system's cell may be located in a cell of another system. Likewise, within a particular system (AMPS, CDMA, and TDMA), there are two service providers within a given area. These providers often choose to place cells in different geographical locations from their competitor, hence there are situations where a radiotelephone on system 'A' might be far away from the nearest system 'A' cell while close to a system 'B' cell. This situation means that the desired receive signal will be weak in the presence of strong multi-tone interference.

0004This intermixing of system antennas can cause problems for a mobile radiotelephone that is registered in one system, such as the CDMA system, and travels near another system's antenna, such as an AMPS antenna. In this case, the signals from the AMPS antenna can interfere with the CDMA signals being received by the radiotelephone due to the proximity of the radiotelephone with the AMPS cell or the higher power of the AMPS forward link signal.

0005The multi-tone interference encountered by the radiotelephone from the AMPS signals creates distortion products or spurs. If these spurs fall in the CDMA band used by the radiotelephone, they can degrade receiver and demodulator performance.

0006It is frequently the case in an AMPS system for the carriers (A and B bands) to 'jam' the competitor system unintentionally. The goal of the cellular carrier is to provide a high signal to noise ratio for all the users of their system by placing cells close to the ground, or near their users, and radiating the FCC power limit for each AMPS channel. Unfortunately, this technique provides for better signal quality for the carrier's system at the expense of interfering with the competitor's system.

0007Intermodulation distortion, such as that caused by the above situations, is defined in terms of the peak spurious level generated by two or more tones injected into a receiver. Most frequently, the third-order distortion level is defined for a receiver in terms of a third-order input intercept point or IIP3. IIP3 is defined as the input power (in the form of two tones) required to create third order distortion products equal to the input two tone power. As shown in <figref idref="f0011">FIG. 13</figref>, IIP3 can only be linearly extrapolated when a non-linear element, such as an amplifier, is below saturation.

0008As shown in <figref idref="f0012">FIG. 14</figref>, third-order distortion products occur when two tones are injected in a receiver. Tone #1 is at frequency f1 at power level P1 in dBm. Tone #2 is at frequency f2 at power level P2 in dBm. Typically P2 is set to equal P1. Third-order distortion products will be created at frequencies 2xf1 - f2 and 2xf2 - f1 at power levels P12 and P21 respectively. If P2 is set to equal P1, then spurious products should be equal, or P12 and P21 should be equal. Signal fc is injected at power level Pc to show that the added distortion is equal to a low level signal in this case. If there is a filter that filters out f1, f2 and f21 after the distortion is created, the power at f12 will still interfere with the signal power at fc. I n example <figref idref="f0012">FIG. 14</figref>, for a CDMA application, the goal is that the intermod P12 should be equal to the signal power of -105 dBm for a total two tone power of -43 dBm, so the IIP3 must be > -9 dBm.

0009As is well known in the art, IIP3 for a single non-linear element is defined as the following: <maths id="math0001"><math display="block"><mi>IIP</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>IM</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn></mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mfrac><mo mathvariant="normal">+</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mi>in</mi></msub><mfenced><mi>dBm</mi></mfenced></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0001.tif" /></maths>

0010If <maths id="math0002"><math display="block"><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">,</mo><msub><mi>then P</mi><mi>in</mi></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">+</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn><mo>⁢</mo><msub><mrow><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB or P</mi></mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">+</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mspace width="1em" /><mfenced><mi>dBm</mi></mfenced></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0002.tif" /></maths> and <maths id="math0003"><math display="block"><mi>IM</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">3</mn><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">12</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">21</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">12</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></msub><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mn mathvariant="normal">21</mn></msub><mspace width="1em" /><mfenced><mi>dB</mi></mfenced></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0003.tif" /></maths>

0011For cascaded IIP3, where more non-linear elements are used, the equation is as follows: <maths id="math0004"><math display="block"><mi>IIP</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>=</mo><mo>-</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>*</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>⁢</mo><mfenced open="[" close="]"><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mfenced><mi>Gain</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>element IIP</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn>3</mn></mfenced><mo>/</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></msup><mo>+</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mfenced><mo>-</mo><mi>IIP</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn>3</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>of previous stages</mi></mfenced><mo>/</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></msup></mfenced></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0004.tif" /></maths> where: Gain = gain to element input.

0012Therefore, one way to improve the cascaded IIP3 of a receiver is to lower the gain before the first non-linear element. In this case, the LNA and mixer limit IIP3. However, another quantity needs to be defined that sets the sensitivity or lowest receive signal level without interference. This quantity is referred to in the art as the noise figure (NF). If the gain of the receiver is reduced to improve IIP3 (and interference immunity), the NF (and sensitivity to small desired signals) is degraded.

0013The Element NF is defined as the following: <maths id="math0005"><math display="block"><mi>Element NF</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi></msub><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi></msub></mfrac><mo>-</mo><mfrac><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi></msub><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi></msub></mfrac><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>dB</mi><mo>)</mo><mo>,</mo></mrow></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0005.tif" /></maths> where: <maths id="math0006"><math display="inline"><mfrac><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi></msub><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">i</mi></msub></mfrac></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0006.tif" /></maths> is the input signal to noise ratio in dB, and <maths id="math0007"><math display="inline"><mfrac><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi></msub><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">o</mi></msub></mfrac></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0007.tif" /></maths> is the output signal to noise ratio in dB.

0014For elements in cascade in a receiver, the equation is as follows: <maths id="math0008"><math display="block"><mi>Cascaded NF</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>10</mn><mo>*</mo><mi>log</mi><mo>⁢</mo><mn>10</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mrow><mo>[</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mfenced><mi>NFi</mi><mo>/</mo><mn>10</mn></mfenced></msup><mo>+</mo><mfrac><mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mfenced><mi mathvariant="italic">NFt</mi><mo>/</mo><mn>10</mn></mfenced></msup><mo>-</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mfenced><mi mathvariant="italic">Gain</mi><mo>/</mo><mn>10</mn></mfenced></msup></mfrac><mo>]</mo><mo>,</mo></mrow></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0008.tif" /></maths> where: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>NFe equals the noise figure of the element,</li><li>NFi equals the cascaded noise figure up to the element, and</li><li>Gain equals the running gain up to the element.</li></ul>

0015The 'best' cascaded NF can be achieved if the gain up to the element is maximized, this equation is in contradiction to the requirement for the 'best' cascaded IIP3. For a given element by element and receiver NF and IIP3, there are a limited set of gain values for each element that meet all of the requirements.

0016Typically, a receiver is designed with NF and IIP3 as predefined constants, as both of these quantities set the receiver's dynamic range of operation with and without interference. The gain, NF, &amp; IIP3 of each device are optimized based on size, cost, thermal, quiescent and active element current consumption. In the case of a dual-mode CDMA/FM portable cellular receiver, the CDMA standard requires a 9 dB NF at minimum signal. In other words, for CDMA mode, the sensitivity requirement is a 0 dB S/N ratio at -104 dBm. For FM mode, the requirement is a 4 dB S/N ratio at -116 dBm. In both cases, the requirements can be translated to a NF as follows: <maths id="math0009"><math display="block"><mi>NF</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">=</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mspace width="1em" /><mfenced><mi>dBm</mi></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><mfrac><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi></mfrac><mfenced><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mi>therm</mi></msub><mspace width="1em" /><mfenced><mi>dBm</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mi>Hz</mi></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">-</mo><mi>Signal BW</mi><mspace width="1em" /><mfenced><mi>dB</mi><mo mathvariant="normal">/</mo><mi>Hz</mi></mfenced><mo mathvariant="normal">,</mo></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0009.tif" /></maths> where <ul id="ul0002" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>S is the minimum signal power,</li><li><maths id="math0010"><math display="inline"><mfrac><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi></mfrac></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0010.tif" /></maths> is the minimum signal to noise ratio,</li><li>N_therm is the thermal noise floor (-174 dBm/Hz @ 290° K),</li><li>and Signal BW (dB/Hz) is the bandwidth of the signal.</li></ul>

0017Therefore, <maths id="math0011"><math display="block"><mi>CDMA NF</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>-</mo><mn>104</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dBm</mi><mo>-</mo><mn>0</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mo>-</mo><mfenced><mo>-</mo><mn>174</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dBm</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>Hz</mi></mfenced><mo>-</mo><mn>61</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>Hz</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>9</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mo>,</mo></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0011.tif" /></maths><maths id="math0012"><math display="block"><mi>FM</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>NF</mi><mo>=</mo><mo>-</mo><mn>116</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dBm</mi><mo>-</mo><mn>4</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mo>-</mo><mfenced><mo>-</mo><mn>174</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dBm</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>Hz</mi></mfenced><mo>-</mo><mn>45</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>Hz</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>9</mn><mspace width="1em" /><mi>dB</mi><mo>,</mo></math><img file="EP1513268B1_D0012.tif" /></maths> where -61 dBm/Hz is the noise bandwidth for a CDMA channel -45 dBm/Hz is the noise bandwidth for a FM channel

0018However, the receiver's NF is only required when the signal is near the minimum level and the IIP3 is only required in the presence of interference or strong CDMA signals.

0019There are only two ways to provide coverage in the areas where the carrier is creating strong interference. One solution is to employ the same technique; i.e., co-locate their cells along with the competition's. Another solution is to improve the immunity of a receiver to interference. One way to improve the immunity is to increase the receiver current. This is not a practical solution, however, for a portable radio that relies on battery power. Increasing the current would drain the battery more rapidly, thereby decreasing the talk and standby time of the radiotelephone. There is a resulting need to minimize multi-tone interference in a radiotelephone without impacting the current consumption.

0020Document <patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="EP0342671A"><text>EP-A-0342671</text></patcit> shows circuitry for staggering the onset of gain reduction in a series of cascaded gain stages as a function of received signal strength. The staggering is effected by controlling the area ratio between corresponding components in two or more AGC control circuits whose topologies are otherwise identical.

Summary of the invention

0021The invention relates to an apparatus according to claim 1.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

0022<ul id="ul0003" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li><figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> shows a block diagram of the apparatus of the present invention for increasing receiver immunity.</li><li><figref idref="f0002">FIG. 2</figref> shows a block diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0003">FIG. 3</figref> shows a block diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0004">FIG. 4</figref> shows a block diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0005">FIG. 5</figref> shows a another plot of received RF input power versus carrier to noise ratio in accordance with the embodiment of <figref idref="f0007">FIG. 7</figref>.</li><li><figref idref="f0006">FIG. 6</figref> shows a plot of receive RF input power versus carrier to noise ratio in accordance with the embodiment of <figref idref="f0008">FIG. 8</figref>.</li><li><figref idref="f0007">FIG. 7</figref> shows a block diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0008">FIG. 8</figref> shows a plot of interference power vs. signal power without using the apparatus of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0009">FIG. 9</figref> shows a plot of interference power vs. signal power in accordance with the alternate embodiments of the apparatus of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0007">FIG. 10</figref> shows a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0010">FIG. 11</figref> shows a block diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0010">FIG. 12</figref> shows a block diagram of another alternate embodiment of the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0011">FIG. 13</figref> shows a plot of non-linear transfer characteristics and distortion measurement.</li><li><figref idref="f0012">FIG. 14</figref> shows a spectral description of distortion products.</li><li><figref idref="f0013">FIG. 15</figref> shows a block diagram of a method for detecting the power of a received signal in accordance with the present invention.</li><li><figref idref="f0014">FIG. 16</figref> shows a flow chart of the attenuation control process of the present invention.</li></ul>

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

0023It is an objective of the present invention to vary the receiver NF and IIP3 for enhancing the IIP3 (or interference immunity) without compromising NF when necessary. This performance 'enhancement' is accomplished by varying the gain of the first active element in the receiver. The gain can be varied by varying the gain of the LNA over a continuous range or switching out the low noise amplifier with bypass switches.

0024A block diagram of an arrangement is illustrated in <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref>. This involves adjusting the LNA <b>115</b> gain on a continuous basis using adjustable gain control (AGC) <b>110</b> at the receiver front end. The continuous AGC <b>110</b> at the front end also provides a linearity benefit at a minimum RF input level while the AGC <b>120</b> on the transmit side may reduce the IF AGC <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> requirements.

0025This arrangement detects the power output from the LNA <b>115.</b> The power detector <b>105</b> measures both the signal power and the jammer power together at RF. Using this arrangement, the power detector <b>105</b> can continuously decrease the LNA <b>115</b> gain at a lower received power than the -65 dBm of the subsequent "switched gain" embodiments of <figref idref="f0007">FIGs. 7, 10</figref>, <figref idref="f0010">11 and 12</figref>.

0026The arrangement operates by the power detector 105 detecting the received signal and jammer power at RF. This detected power goes through a loop filter and is used to adjust the receive AGC <b>110,</b> thereby adjusting the intercept point of the receive components. The gain is decreased as the measured power increases and the gain is increased as the measured power decreases. This arrangement could also combine the LNA <b>115</b> and the AGC <b>110</b> to form a variable gain LNA, thus eliminating the need for the separate AGC 110 block. The power of the transmit AGC <b>120,</b> located before the power amplifier <b>150,</b> is adjusted in the same way as the receive AGC <b>110</b> in order to maintain the overall TX power level.

0027AGC amplifiers <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> are also located after the mixers 135 and <b>140</b> in order to adjust the gain after the jammers have been filtered out by the bandpass filter <b>145.</b> These AGC amplifiers <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> perform the normal CDMA AGC function of open loop power control, closed loop power control, and compensation. These IF AGCs <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> are required due to the wide dynamic range requirements for CDMA. Typically, these AGCs <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> have greater than 80 dB of gain range. The receive and transmit AGC <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> after the mixers are adjusted by another power detector <b>150</b> that measures the total power after the received signal is downconverted. The power detector <b>150</b> adjusts the AGCs <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> gain downward as the downconverted signal's power increases and adjusts the AGCs <b>125</b> and <b>130</b> gain upward as the downconverted signal's power decreases.

0028In the arrangement, the received signals are in the frequency band of 869-894 MHz. The transmitted signals are in the frequency band of 82A-849 MHz. Alternate arrangements use different frequencies.

0029The plot illustrated in <figref idref="f0005">FIG. 5</figref> shows the benefit of this AGC approach. The left hand y-axis shows the carrier over noise ratio versus receive input power parameterized by the jammer level. The right hand y-axis shows the total jammer power required for a constant C/J as a function of received input power. When the jammer is not present (-100 dBm), the radio operates as though there is no RF AGC. As the jammer is increased, the C/N is decreased, but the effective linearity is also increased. In this example, the RF dynamic range is 30 dB and the threshold, where the RF AGC becomes active, is at the point the jammer power is greater than -25 dBm.

0030An alternate arrangement of the continuous gain adjustment is illustrated in <figref idref="f0002">FIG. 2</figref>. This arrangement first filters out the jammers with the bandpass filter <b>205</b> before the power detector <b>210</b> determines the power level of the downconverted signal. A threshold detector <b>225</b> determines when the signal power level reaches a certain point, -105 dBm in this arrangement and then adjusts the AGCs <b>230</b> and <b>235</b> gain down when the signal power exceeds that power level. The AGCs <b>230</b> and <b>235</b> gain is adjusted upward when the signal power level goes below this threshold. The gain of AGCs <b>215</b> and <b>220</b> after the mixers <b>240</b> and <b>245</b> is adjusted continuously without checking for a predetermined threshold of power, performing the normal CDMA AGC power control.

0031The plot of this arrangement is illustrated in <figref idref="f0006">FIG. 6</figref>. When the threshold is set at -105 dBm, the minimum receive RF level, the C/N does not increase as quickly as the case where there is no RF AGC. The advantage of this arrangement is that the linearity benefit begins at a very low RF input power, no receive RF power detector is needed, and the AGC loop detects signal power only. Hence, the AGC loop is a simpler design than detecting at RF power.

0032Still another arrangement of the present invention is illustrated in <figref idref="f0003">FIG. 3</figref>. This arrangement operates similarly to the embodiment of <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref>. The only difference being the placement of the AGC <b>301</b> prior to the LNA <b>305</b> in the receive path.

0033Yet another arrangement is illustrated in <figref idref="f0004">FIG. 4</figref>. This arrangement uses an attenuator <b>405</b> between the antenna <b>410</b> and the duplexer <b>415.</b> The attenuation is controlled by the power detector <b>420</b> after the LNA <b>425.</b> The power detector <b>420</b> measures the received signal and jammer power, filters it, and compares it to a predetermined threshold. In this arrangement, the threshold is -25 dBm. When the combined signal and jammer power reaches this threshold, the attenuation caused by the attenuator <b>405</b> is increased. This adjustment can be either in digital fixed steps or continuously adjusted. The AGC <b>430</b> and <b>435</b> after the mixers <b>440</b> and <b>445</b> are adjusted in the same manner as the <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> arrangement.

0034An alternate arrangement of the apparatus is illustrated in <figref idref="f0007">FIG. 7</figref>. This arrangement uses switches <b>701</b> and <b>702</b> to alter the front end gain. The actual switching level depends on the signal to noise requirements as a function of the signal level, or noise figure, for a particular CDMA radiotelephone design. The present invention can be used in an AMPS radiotelephone, however the switching characteristics will be changed to accommodate a different operating point.

0035This arrangement is comprised of an antenna <b>725</b> that receives and transmits radio signals. Receive and transmit paths in the radio are coupled to the antenna <b>725</b> through a duplexer <b>720</b> that separates the received signals from the transmitted signals.

0036A received signal is input to an LNA <b>703</b> that is coupled between two switches <b>701</b> and <b>702.</b> One switch <b>701</b> couples the LNA <b>703</b> to the duplexer <b>720</b> and the second switch <b>702</b> couples the LNA <b>703</b> to a band-pass filter <b>704.</b> In the preferred arrangement, the switches <b>701</b> and <b>702</b> are single-pole double-throw gallium arsenide switches.

0037The LNA <b>703</b> is coupled to one pole of each switch such that when both switches <b>701</b> and <b>702</b> are switched to those poles, the received signal is coupled to the LNA <b>703</b> and the amplified signal from the LNA <b>703</b> is output to the band-pass filter <b>704.</b> The band-pass filter <b>704</b> in this arrangement has a frequency band of 869-894 MHz. Alternate arrangements use different bands depending on the frequencies of the signals being received.

0038A bypass path <b>730</b> is coupled to the other pole of each switch. When the switches <b>701</b> and <b>702</b> are switched to their other poles, the received signal from the duplexer <b>720</b> bypasses the LNA <b>703</b> and is conducted directly to the band-pass filter <b>704.</b> In this arrangement, these switches <b>701</b> and <b>702</b> are controlled by the radiotelephone's microcontroller <b>740.</b> In an alternate arrangement, a separate controller is used to control the positions of these switches.

0039After the band-pass filter <b>704</b> has filtered the received signal, the filtered signal is downconverted to a lower intermediate frequency (IF) for use by the rest of the radio. The down-conversion is done by mixing <b>705</b> the received signal with another signal having a frequency set by a phase locked loop <b>707</b> driving a voltage controlled oscillator <b>706.</b> This signal is amplified <b>750</b> before being input to the mixer <b>705.</b>

0040The downconverted signal from the mixer <b>705</b> is input to the back end AGCs <b>708</b> and <b>709.</b> These AGCs <b>708</b> and <b>709</b> are used by the radiotelephone for closed loop power control, as is already well known in the art.

0041In the process, the microcontroller <b>740</b> monitors the power of the received signal. When the power exceeds <b>-65</b> dBm, the microcontroller <b>740</b> instructs the switches <b>701</b> and <b>702</b> to switch to the bypass position, thus coupling the received signal directly to the bandpass filter <b>704.</b> By bypassing the LNA <b>703</b> gain, the intercept point for the receiver is increased proportionally by the reduction in gain in dB. Alternate embodiments use other circuitry and methods to monitor the power of the received signal.

0042An alternate arrangements of the process continuously adjusts the front end gain. This arrangement uses a lower power threshold such as -25 dBm.

0043The plots of <figref idref="f0008">FIGs. 8</figref> and <figref idref="f0009">9</figref> illustrate the benefits of the switchable gain arrangements illustrated in <figref idref="f0007">FIGs. 7, 10</figref>, <figref idref="f0010">11 and 12</figref>. <figref idref="f0008">FIG. 8</figref> illustrates a plot of interference power versus radio frequency (RF) signal power for a typical radio that is not using the switchable gain apparatus. This plot shows that the maximum interference level is limited to the receiver input compression point at -10.5 dBm. Both the single and dual tone power curves are shown.

0044The plot of <figref idref="f0009">FIG. 9</figref> shows the interference power received by the radio versus the radio frequency signal power received by the radio using the switchable gain method and apparatus. It can be seen that at the -65 dBm point of the graph, the switches are switched to bypass the LNA gain thus allowing a greater interference power to be tolerated without affecting the RF signal power. Both the single tone and two tone power curves are shown.

0045Another alternate arrangement is illustrated in <figref idref="f0007">FIG. 10</figref>. This arrangement uses a single-pole single-throw switch <b>1001.</b> In this arrangement, the switch <b>1001</b> is switched to the bypass path <b>1010</b> by the controller <b>1020</b> when the received signal power reaches -65 dBm. This effectively shorts out the LNA <b>1002</b> gain, thus coupling the received signal directly to the band-pass filter <b>1003.</b>

0046The embodiment of the apparatus of the present invention is illustrated in <figref idref="f0010">FIG. 11</figref>. This embodiment uses a single-pole single-throw switch <b>1105</b> that, when closed, shorts the input of the LNA <b>1110</b> to ground through a resistor <b>1101.</b> This creates an impedance mismatch at the input causing the signal to attenuate, thus reducing the gain caused by the LNA <b>1110.</b> As in the above arrangements, the switch <b>1105</b> is closed when the input signal power reaches -65 dBm. The resistance required for the resistor <b>1101</b> is dependent on the amount of attenuation desired. This resistance will be different for different LNA's in alternate embodiments.

0047Still another arrangement of the apparatus is illustrated in <figref idref="f0010">FIG. 12</figref>. This arrangement uses a single-pole double-throw switch <b>1201</b> at the output of the LNA <b>1205.</b> The LNA <b>1205</b> is connected to one pole of the switch <b>1201</b> and a bypass path <b>1210</b> is connected to the other pole. The input to the bypass path <b>1210</b> is connected to the input of the LNA <b>1205.</b> When the power level of the received RF signal reaches -65 dBm, the switch <b>1201</b> is thrown from the position coupling the LNA <b>1205</b> to the band-pass filter <b>1220</b> to the bypass path <b>1210.</b> This couples the signal directly to the band-pass filter <b>1220,</b> bypassing the gain of the LNA <b>1205.</b>

0048In all of the above arrangements, the LNA can be powered down at the same time that it is bypassed by the switch or switches. This can be accomplished by connecting the LNA's power pin to a switch that is also controlled by the controller. Once the LNA is bypassed and is no longer used, power can be removed. This reduces the power consumption of the radio, thus increasing the talk and standby time for which the battery can be used.

0049In another arrangement of the present invention, E_c/I_o detection is used to determine when to adjust the front end gain. Additional arrangements use other quality measurements, such as E_b/I_o.

0050These ratios are quality measurements for digital communications system performance. The E_b/I_o ratio expresses the energy per bit to the total interference spectral density of the channel while the E_c/I_o ratio expresses the energy per CDMA chip relative to the total interference spectral density. E_b/I_o can be considered a metric that characterizes the performance of one communication system over another; the smaller the required E_b/I_o the more efficient is the system modulation and detection process for a given probability of error. Given that E_c/I_o and received signal strength are readily available, the microcontroller can detect the presence of strong interference as a drop in E_c/I_o while the AGC detector detects the increased interference. The microcontroller can lower the front end gain to improve interference immunity which would improve E_c/I_o and lower the distortion products falling within the signal bandwidth.

0051When the signal quality goes above the E_b/I_o or E_c/I_o threshold, the front end gain is reduced. The gain adjustment can be accomplished using either the continuous adjustment method or the amplifier switching method, both described above.

0052Still another arrangement, illustrated in <figref idref="f0013">FIG. 15</figref>, would be to detect the signal power at IF or baseband instead of the combination of the signal and jammer power at RF. This approach is simpler in that there is only one power detector and AGC control loop.

0053<figref idref="f0013">FIG. 15</figref> illustrates a block diagram of the alternate method of detecting the power of the received signal. The signal is first downconverted to baseband frequency <b>1501.</b> This analog signal is then converted to a digital signal <b>1505</b> for further baseband processing including determining the received signal strength. The chip correlator 1510determines the energy per chip with respect to the energy of all the non-coherent components. This information, along with the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) is used by the processor <b>1515</b> to determine the amount of gain adjustment for both the receive <b>1520</b> and transmit <b>1530</b> power.

0054Since the received signal power measurement includes both the signal and jammer power, the receive gain is increased only when both the signal level and the energy per chip drops. Since the RSSI is being changed, the transmit power must also be changed to compensate, thus enabling the open loop power control to operate properly. Thus, the processor adjusts the transmit gain whenever the receive gain is adjusted.

0055Other arrangements use erasures or signal power to control the variable gain AGC. Additional arrangements, instead of controlling both transmit and receive power, only control receiver power.

0056A process for controlling the gain of the above arrangements is illustrated in <figref idref="f0014">FIG. 16</figref>. This process is based on the relationship illustrated in the graph of <figref idref="f0011">FIG. 13</figref>. In <figref idref="f0011">FIG. 13</figref>, one can see that as the interference input power increases along the X axis, the intermodulation products (the lower curve) increase faster than the interference power. Therefore, X dB of attenuation applied at the input will result in a decrease of the IM3 intermodulation products by 3*X dB if interference is present at the receiver input.

0057Typically, intermodulation products don't fall into the IF section of the radio due to their low power. Intermodulation products outside of the IF section of the radio do not cause receiver performance problems. Thus, adjustment of the receiver gain is only necessary if the intermodulation products are of sufficient power to affect the IF signal.

0058Referring to <figref idref="f0014">FIG. 16</figref>, the process first adjusts the input gain <b>1601</b>. In the arrangement, this gain adjustment is 3 dB. However, other arrangements can use other values of gain adjustment, such as the range of 1 dB - 6 dB. The receiver processing is then used to measure the change in the power of the received signal 1605. In the arrangement, the automatic gain control processing detects the IF signal power change. It is understood that measurement of the change in received signal power may be accomplished at the RF or baseband stages of the receiver as well.

0059If the signal power changes by approximately 3 dB, the CDMA signal is greater than the noise floor and there are no intermodulation products that might cause problems. Additional gain adjustment is not needed in this case, but increasing the gain will improve receiver sensitivity. IF signal power changes of approximately (3 ± 0.5) dB are still considered to be 3 dB.

0060If the IF signal power changes by less than 3 dB <b>1610,</b> the CDMA signal is less than the noise floor or there are no intermodulation products that might cause problems. In this case, the AGC is only seeing a small CDMA signal and noise. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the receiver circuit gain <b>1615</b> and thus increase the sensitivity of the receiver.

0061If the IF signal power changes by more than 3 dB, the intermodulation products are causing enough of a problem that additional gain adjustment is necessary <b>1620.</b> In the arrangement, if the input gain was changed by 3 dB the intermodulation products will change by 9 dB when large interference is present. In this case, the average gain may be decreased by a small amount (e.g., 3 dB) until the process of the present invention determines that the intermodulation products are reduced to an acceptable level.

0062The process of the present invention can be used continuously, checking for intermodulation products at a low rate. This rate is ten times per second. Other arrangement use the process once per frame cycle. Still other arrangements use the process at other rates, such as upon detection of a significant error on the forward link.

0063In summary, the method of the present invention enables a mobile radio to travel near antennas of different systems while increasing the radio's resistance to radio frequency interference from the other system. By decreasing the front end gain, the intercept point of the radio's receive circuitry increases so that the spurs from the other system's signals will not cause performance degradation of the receiver and demodulator.