Downlink power control for multiple downlink time slots in tdd communication systems

<b>BACKGROUND</b>

This invention generally relates to spread spectrum time division duplex (TDD) communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for controlling downlink transmission power within TDD communication systems.

Spread spectrum TDD systems carry multiple communications over the same spectrum. The multiple signals are distinguished by their respective chip code sequences (codes). Referring to Figure 1, TDD systems use repeating frames 34 divided into a number oftime slots 37₁-37_n, such as fifteen time slots. In such systems, a communication is sent in a selected time slot out of the plurality of time slots 37₁-37_n using selected codes. Accordingly, one frame 34 is capable of carrying multiple communications distinguished by both time slot and code. The combination of a single code in a single time slot is referred to as a physical channel. Based on the bandwidth required to support a communication, one or multiple physical channels are assigned to that communication.

Most TDD systems adaptively control transmission power levels. In a TDD system, many communications may share the same time slot and spectrum. While user equipment (UE) 22 is receiving a downlink transmission from a base station, all the other communications using the same time slot and spectrum cause interference to the specific communication. Increasing the transmission power level of one communication degrades the signal quality of all other communications within that time slot and spectrum. However, reducing the transmission power level too far results in undesirable signal to noise ratios (SNRs) and bit error rates (BERs) at the receivers. To maintain both the signal quality of communications and low transmission power levels, transmission power control is used.

The standard approach to TDD downlink power control is a combination of inner and outer loop control. In this standard solution, the UE transmits physical layer transmit power control (TPC) commands to adjust the base station transmission power. A base station sends a transmission to a particular UE. Upon receipt, the UE measures the signal interference ratio (SIR) in all time slots and compares this measured value to a SIR_TARGET. This SIR_TARGET is generated from the Block Error Rate (BLER) signaled from the base station.

As a result of the comparison of the measured SIR value with the SIR_TARGET, the UE transmits a TPC command to the base station. The standard approach provides for a TPC command per coded composite transport channel (CCTrCH). The CCTrCH is a physical channel which comprises the combined units of data for transmission over the radio interface to and from the UE or base station. This TPC command indicates to the base station to adjust the transmission power level of the downlink communication. The base station, which is set at an initial transmission power level, receives the TPC command and adjusts the transmit power level in all time slots associated with the CCTrCH in unison.

This approach to TDD downlinkpower control works well as long as the interference in each time slot is the same. Unfortunately, in most cases, the interference in each time slot is different. A small difference may be acceptable due to the averaging effect of the interleaving, but larger differences cause degradation due to thresholding effects in the receiver. This requires the receiver to have a wider dynamic range and unnecessarily high transmit power in some time slots. An adjustment made to the base station SIR_TARGET for all time slots based on the error value may create an unbalanced increase or decrease of the power level. In other words, those time slots where the power level was lower than the initial value of the base station will be adjusted even lower when the calculated error value was higher than the SIR_TARGET. These low level power time slots may then be eliminated from detection, thereby the transmission will be degraded. The same is true for those time slots in which the power level was higher than the SIR_TARGET of the base station. When the detected error rate is lower than the SIR_TARGET, the higher power level time slots will be increased, thereby creating interference with other channels on the system.

Accordingly, there is a need to have an approach to TDD downlink power control which adjusts the power level of each slot individually. US, 5 898 925 discloses the control of transmissing power of a mobile station in a TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) telecommunications system.

SUMMARY

The present invention is a method and system for controlling downlink transmission power levels in a spread spectrum time division communication system having frames with time slots for communication, which receives at a user equipment (UE) a downlink communication from a base station and determines an error rate of the received communication. The UE then produces power level adjustments for each of the time slots based in part on the error rate and transmits an uplink communication to the base station which includes the power level adjustment for each of the time slots. In response to the power level adjustments transmission power level is set for each time slot in the downlink communication.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S)

Figure 1 illustrates time slots in repeating frames of a TDD system.

Figure 2 illustrates a simplified wireless TDD system.

Figures 3A and 3B illustrate block diagrams of a UE and base station, respectively.

Figure 4 illustrates a flow diagram of a first embodiment.

Figure 5 illustrates a flow diagram of a second embodiment.

Figure 6 illustrates a block diagram of the base station made in accordance with the second embodiment.

Figure 7 illustrates a flow diagram of a third embodiment.

Figure 8 illustrates a flow diagram of a fourth embodiment

Figure 9 illustrates a flow diagram of a fifth embodiment.

Figure 10 illustrates a flow diagram of a sixth embodiment.

Figure 11 illustrates a flow diagram of a seventh embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

The preferred embodiments will be described with reference to the drawing figures where like numerals represent like elements throughout.

Figure 2 illustrates a simplified wireless spread spectrum code division multiple access (CDMA) or time division duplex (TDD) communication system 18. The system 18 comprises a plurality ofnode Bs 26, 32, 34, a plurality of radio network controllers (RNC), 36, 38, 40, a plurality of UEs 20, 22, 24 and a core network 46. The plurality ofnode Bs 26, 32, 34 are connected to a plurality RNCs 36, 38, 40, which are, in turn, connected to the core network 46. Each Node B, such as Node B 26, communicates with its associated user equipment 20-24 (UE). The Node B 26 has a single site controller (SC) associated with either a single base station 30₁, or multiple base stations 30₁...30_n.

Although the present invention is intended to work with one or more UEs, Node Bs and RNCs, for simplicity of explanation, reference will be made hereinafter to the operation of a single UE in conjunction with its associated Node B and RNC.

Referring to Figure 3A, the UE 22 comprises an antenna 78, an isolator or switch 66, a modulator 64, a demodulator 68, a channel estimation device 70, data estimation device 72, a transmit power calculation device 76, an interference measurement device 74, an error detection device 112, a processor 111, a target adjustment generator 114, a reference channel data generator 56, a data generator 50, and two spreading and training sequence insertion devices 52, 58.

The UE 22 receives various radio frequency (RF) signals including communications from the base station 30₁ over the wireless radio channel using an antenna 78, or alternatively an antenna array. The received signals are passed through a T/R switch 66 to a demodulator 68 to produce a baseband signal. The baseband signal is processed, such as by a channel estimation device 70 and a data estimation device 72, in the time slots and with the appropriate codes assigned to the UEs 22 communication. The channel estimation device 70 commonly uses the training sequence component in the baseband signal to provide channel information, such as channel impulse responses. The channel information is used by the data estimation device 72, the interference measurement device 74 and the transmit power calculation device 76. The data estimation device 72 recovers data from the channel by estimating soft symbols using the channel information.

Prior to transmission of the communication from the base station 30₁, the data signal of the communication is error encoded using an error detection/correction encoder 112. The error encoding scheme is typically a cyclic redundancy code (CRC) followed by a forward error correction encoding, although other types of error encoding schemes may be used. As those skilled in the art know, the data is typically interleaved over all of the time slots and all codes.

Using the soft symbols produced by the data estimation device 72, the error detection device 112 detects errors in the frame. Each time a frame is determined to have an error, a counter is incremented. This counter value becomes the block error rate (BLER). A processor 111 in the UE 22 typically determines a target signal to interference ratio SIR value based on the measured BLER and determines a signal to interference ratio SIR_UE for all time slots. Based on the SIR_UE, the processor 111 determines the adjustment of the base station transmit power by comparing the SIR_UE with the SIR_TARGET. Based on this comparison, a TPC command is generated by the target adjustment generator 114 for each time slot. Each TPC command is subsequently sent to the base station.

In a first embodiment of the present invention, the target adjustment generator 114 in the UE 22 generates and transmits TPC commands in each time slot of the CCTrCH. The TPC command in each time slot indicates to the base station 30₁ to adjust the downlink transmission power level for each time slot. The uplink physical channel comprises these TPC commands for each slot associated with the CCTrCH, and is communicated to the base station for processing. These TPC commands may be transmitted in a single uplink physical channel, or spread over several uplink physical channels.

Referring to Figure 3B, a base station made in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. The antenna 82 or, alternately, antenna array of the base station 30₁ receives various RF signals including the TPC commands. The received signals are passed via a switch 84 to a demodulator 86 to produce a baseband signal. Alternatively separate antennas may be used for transmit or receive functions. The baseband signal is processed, such as by a channel estimation device 88 and a data estimation device 90, in the time slots and with the appropriate codes assigned to the communication burst of the UE 22. The channel estimation device 88 commonly uses the training sequence component in the baseband signal to provide channel information, such as channel impulse responses. The channel information is used by the data estimation device 90. The data information is provided to the transmit power calculation device 98 by processor 103.

Processor 103 converts the soft symbols produced by the data estimation device 90 to bits and extracts the TPC commands for each time slot associated with the CCTrCH. The transmit power calculation device 98 combines the TPC commands with the SIR_target to determine the transmission power for each time slot associated with the CCTrCH.

Data to be transmitted from the base station 30₁ is produced by data generator 102. The data is error detection/correction encoded by error detection/correction encoder 110. The error encoded data is spread and time-multiplexed with a training sequence by the training sequence insertion device 104 in the appropriate time slot(s) and code(s) of the assigned physical channels, producing a communication burst(s). The spread signal is amplified by an amplifier 106 and modulated by modulator 108 to radio frequency. The gain of the amplifier is controlled by the transmit power calculation device 98 to achieve the determined transmission power level for each time slot. The power controlled communication burst(s) is passed through the isolator 84 and radiated by the antenna 82.

A flow diagram illustrating the method of downlink power control in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention is shown in Figure 4. The UE 22 receives a downlink signal from the base station 30₁, (step 401), which is then processed by the UE 22 (step 402). The UE 22 then determines the SIR for each time slot of the CCTrCH and compares it to the SIR_target (step 403). The UE then generates a TPC command for each time slot (step 404). The TPC commands are transmitted to the base station 30, associated with the UE 22, (step 405), which adjusts the transmission power per time slot of the CCTrCH (step 406).

The use of TPC commands for every time slot provides the communication system with a simple method of equalizing the signal to interference ratio (SIR) in all downlink slots. Since the interference level in different time slots is generally different, this method of the first embodiment of the present invention accounts for this difference and generates a separate TPC command for each time slot to adjust the power level of each time slot in the downlink signal.

A second embodiment of the present invention presents an alternative approach for balancing the adjustment to the power level individually in each time slot, during downlink transmission by utilizing the time slot interference data from each time slot, a measured downlink interference signal code power (ISCP). This ISCP measurement is made by the UE 22 from time to time, determined by interference rate of change and the amount of interference difference that can be tolerated by the UE 22 without degradation.

This second embodiment utilizes the time slot interference data from each time slot to equalize the SIR in different slots to counter the fact that the interference is different in each slot. As will be explained in greater detail hereinafter, a TPC command per CCTrCH along with interference information for each slot are used to adjust the transmission power. The difference between the interference in different time slots modifies the values that are obtained from the TPC commands. Therefore, although the interference in each time slot may be different, use of the ISCP information maintains approximately the same SIR in all time slots.

The UE 22, at each frame, sends a TPC command that corresponds to the average SIR in all time slots that belong to the same CCTrCH. The base station 30₁, then constructs an average transmit power per CCTrCH based on the received TPC commands. As will be explained in greater detail hereinafter, the base station 30₁, then modifies the average power to obtain the transmit power for each time slot for the CCTrCH, based on the relevant interference data and the time slot mapping used. It should be noted that this alternate approach allows the use of multiple spreading factors.

Referring to Figure 6, a base station made in accordance with this second embodiment is illustrated. The transmit power calculation device 698 within the base station 30₁ initializes the downlink power control approach of the second embodiment by combining the interference and spreading code information to estimate equivalent power obtained from the TPC commands P. <maths id="math0001" num="Equation 1"><math display="block"><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi><mo>/</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow><mstyle displaystyle="true"><msub><mo>∑</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mstyle displaystyle="true"><msub><mo>∑</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></msub><mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></mstyle></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0001.tif" /></maths> where j and k refer to time slot and physical channel respectively; N is the total number ofphysical channels at spreading factor of 16 in one slot. I_j represents the interference in time slot j, j = 1,...N; F is a scaling factor and 1/S_jk is the spreading factor.

The transmit power calculation device 698 then, using the interference per time slot and the mapping information stored in the base station data base 696, calculates the scaling factor F in accordance with the following equation: <maths id="math0002" num="Equation 2"><math display="block"><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi></mrow><mo>/</mo><mrow><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mstyle displaystyle="true"><msub><mo>∑</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mstyle displaystyle="true"><msub><mo>∑</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></msub><mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></mstyle></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0002.tif" /></maths> and the transmit power for all physical channels P_jk according to Equation 3: <maths id="math0003" num="Equation 3"><math display="block"><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub></mrow><mo>/</mo><mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0003.tif" /></maths> The power per time slot is defined as: <maths id="math0004" num="Equation 4"><math display="block"><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">F</mi><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mstyle displaystyle="true"><msub><mo>∑</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></msub><mrow><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">S</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">k</mi></msub></mrow></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0004.tif" /></maths> During steady state operation, the transmit power calculation device 698 updates the scaling factor F for each physical channel whenever new downlink interference signal code power (ISCP) measurements I for each time slot associated with the particular downlink CCTrCH are available. In order for the transmit power calculation device 698 to calculate the scaling factor F, the spreading factor for each physical channel is used. The transmit power calculation device 698 calculates the transmit power using the ISCP measurement I which is made available to the transmit power calculation device 698 either periodically or whenever new interference information warrants an update.

When a new ISCP measurement I is made, the measurement is transferred to the base station 30, for calculation of the transmit power for each physical channel. If a new ISCP measurement I is not available, the TPC command from the UE 22 is used to modify P in the standard way, and the transmit power for all physical channels P_jk is calculated therefrom.

Referring to Figure 5, a flow diagram of downlink power control in accordance with this second embodiment is illustrated. The UE 22 receives a downlink communication from the base station 30₁ (step 501). If the UE 22 determines an updated ISCP measurement is required, the UE 22 makes an ISCP measurement for each time slot in the downlink communication (step 502) and forwards the new ISCP measurements to the base station 30, (step 504). Otherwise the UE 22 generates a TPC command (503) and forwards it to the base station (step 504). The base station 30₁ calculates the scaling factor for all physical channels using the TPC command or ISCP measurement from the UE 22. The transmission power level for each time slot is then calculated by the base station 30₁ (step 505) and the downlink signal updated accordingly (step 506).

It should be noted that even though the second embodiment has been described with the base station storing all required information and conducting all calculations on its own, the Node B 26 and RNC 36 may perform this function instead. Referring to Figure 7, a flow diagram illustrates a third embodiment downlink power control system wherein the Node B 26 and RNC 36 are involved. The UE 22 receives a downlink communication from the base station 30₁ (step 701). If the UE 22 determines an updated ISCP measurement is required, the UE 22 makes an ISCP measurement for each time slot in the downlink communication (Step 702) and forwards the new ISCP measurements to the RNC 36 (step 704). Otherwise the UE 22 generates a TPC command (step 703) and forwards it to the RNC 36 (step 704). If the downlink power control system is set up to have the RNC 36 calculate the transmit power, the transmit power for each time slot is calculated by the RNC 36 (step 705) and then forwarded to the Node B 26 in order to update the base station 30₁ downlink signal (step 706). If the Node B 26 is setup to calculate the transmit power, the RNC 36 transmits the ISCP or TPC command to the Node B26 (step 707) where the transmit power for each time slot is calculated (step 705).

A fourth embodiment for downlink power level control utilizes time slot interference data similar to that disclosed in the second embodiment above. In this approach though, time slot interference is calculated from knowledge of the allocated downlink physical channels by the base station 30₁, and loading information and path loss from all neighbor base stations to the UE 22, rather than requiring explicit ISCP measurements from the UE 22. Each base station, such as base station 30₁, knows all allocated channel configurations for the UE's 22 specific base station 30₁, as well as other neighbor base stations 30₂...30_n. Obviously, if there is only one base station 30₁, no additional information from other base stations is required. The base station 30₁ must also know the load and path loss information of all neighboring base stations from the neighboring base stations to the UE 22.

When there are multiple base stations, the UE 22 typically measures the primary common control physical channel (PCCPCH) power of base stations under the control of its base station's Node B 26 and all other base stations. The base station 30₁ uses the known PCCPCH transmission power and the power measurement of same as received by the UE to estimate the path loss between the UE and each of the neighbor base stations.

Referring again to Figure 6, the base station database 696 has stored therein the loading information which specifies the physical channels in the neighbor base station by time slot. This loading information is combined with the PCCPCH. The received signal code power (RSCP) for the particular base station is used to estimate the interference effect of the neighboring base station. From these calculations, the interference at the UE 22 can be calculated. For a non-multiple user detection (MUD) UE, the interference of its associated base station and the interference of the neighboring base stations are used to calculate this value. For a MUD UE, interference generated by the UE's associated base station is excluded from the UE interference value.

The estimated interference, I(n), using known loading information is calculated by the transmit power calculation device 698 as: <maths id="math0005" num="Equation 5"><math display="block"><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mstyle displaystyle="true"><mo>∑</mo><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0005.tif" /></maths> Applying this estimated interference value to Equations 1 through 4, the transmit power calculation device 698 calculates the transmit power for each time slot.

Referring to Figure 8, a flow diagram of downlink power control in accordance with this fourth embodiment is illustrated. The base station 30, calculates the estimated interference I for each time slot (step 801) and then calculates the transmission power level for each time slot (step 802) using Equations 1 thru 5 above, which updates the base station downlink signal (step 803).

Again it should be noted that the node B 26 and RNC 36 may also conduct the function of storing all required information and calculating the estimated interference and the transmit power for each time slot. Referring to Figure 9, a flow diagram of downlink power control in accordance with this fifth embodiment is illustrated. The RNC 36 calculates an estimated interference I for each time slot (step 901). If the system is configured such that the node B 26 calculates the transmit power, the RNC 36 forwards the estimated interference I to the node B 26 (step 902) where the transmit power for all physical channels is calculated (step 903), and the base station downlink signal updated (step 904). Otherwise the RNC 36 calculates the transmission power for each the slot (step 903).

Since physical channels are allocated by the RNC in advance of actual physical transmission, it is possible for a Node B to calculate the expected UE interference for the frame being transmitted in real time. The real time interference calculation allows for the correct transmission power for each time slot for the frame being transmitted.

A sixth embodiment of the present invention utilizes the combination of the measured and estimated interference approaches disclosed above to control downlink power. In this approach, the base station 30₁ combines weighted interference values for both the estimated interference and measured interference to calculate the transmission power per time slot of the CCTrCH. For MUD UE, the relevant interference (that affects detection performance) in each slot is denoted as: <maths id="math0006" num="Equation 6"><math display="block"><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mstyle displaystyle="true"><munder><mo>∑</mo><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">all</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mo>≠</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></munder><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0006.tif" /></maths> where P_j(n) is the transmission power of base station j at time n in a certain slot, P₀, being the transmission power of the UE's base station 30₁. L_j(n) denoting the corresponding path loss. For a non-MUD UE, the relevant interference is denoted as: <maths id="math0007" num="Equation 7"><math display="block"><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mstyle displaystyle="true"><munder><mo>∑</mo><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">all</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></mrow></munder><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0007.tif" /></maths> The measured interference I_D(n), though, will be reported by the UE as an ISCP measurement. Equations 6 and 7 are merely illustrative of this interference present in the communication system:

The estimated interference is denoted as: <maths id="math0008" num="Equation 8"><math display="block"><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>=</mo><mstyle displaystyle="true"><mo>∑</mo><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">P</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi></msub><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">n</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></mstyle></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0008.tif" /></maths> Where the summation is carried over all known interferers whose load and path loss to the UE are known. Similar to the fifth embodiment, load information is known by the base station 30₁ for all j. Any interference from a load UE not known is designated as the residual interference I_f(n), I_f(n) = I(n) - I_D(n). From each of these interference values, the transmission power device 698 combines them to generate a more accurate interference power value to be used in the estimation of the downlink transmission power for each time slot, defined by Equations 1 thru 4. The combined interference power value is defined as: <maths id="math0009" num="Equation 9"><math display="block"><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mo>=</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">α</mi><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">f</mi></msub><mo>+</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">β</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mo>+</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">I</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi></msub><mo>,</mo><mi> </mi><mi mathvariant="normal">α</mi><mo>+</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">β</mi><mo>+</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math><img file="EP1297635B1_D0009.tif" /></maths> where coefficients α, β and γ are determined per system or even per slot according to measurement delays or existence of foreign base stations.

Illustrated in Figure 10 is a flow diagram of the downlink power control system in accordance with the sixth embodinient. The base station 30₁ receives a communication from the UE22 including an ISCP interference measurement I_D for each time slot (step 1001). The transmission power calculation device 698 then calculates an estimated interference value I using information stored in the base station database 696 (step 1002). A residual interference value I_F is then calculated by the transmission power calculation device (step 1003). The transmission power calculation device then combines the three interference values I_D, I, I_F (step 1004) and calculates the transmission power for each time slot of the downlink communication (step 1005).

Similar to the previous embodiments, the RNC 36 and Node B 26 may calculate the transmission power for each time slot as described above in a seventh embodiment. Referring to Figure 11, a flow diagram of this embodiment is illustrated. The RNC 36 receives a communication from the UE 22 including an ISCP interference measurement I_D for each time slot, (step 1101) The RNC 36 then calculates an estimated interference value Î using information stored in the RNC 36 (step 1102) and a residual interference value I_F (step 1103). The RNC 36 then combines the three interference values I_D, Î, I_F (step 1104) and calculates the transmission power for each time slot of the downlink communication using Equations 1 thru 4 (step 1106) and forwards them to the base station 30₁ by way of the node B 26. (step 1107) If the downlink power control system is set up to allow the node B 26 to calculate the transmission power for each time slot, the RNC 36 forwards the combined interference value I to the node B 26 (step 1105), which calculates the transmission power for each time slot (step 1106) and forwards them to the base station (step 1107).

The benefit ofproviding a system which utilizes a measured ISCP value and an estimated interference value to calculate the transmission power for each time slot of the downlink communication is two fold: 1) the system provides flexibility to the calculation of transmission power in a case where the required information is not known; and 2) the system provides a more accurate estimate of the interference present in the communication system.