Method for computer assisted cartography
9 claims: 9 independent, 0 dependent
- 1A method for computer-aided mapping of geo-referenced measurement parameters, in particular agricultural yield parameters, which were ascertained in a cutting area, in particular along travel tracks (F1 - F4), by a collecting apparatus, for example a harvesting apparatus, in association with individual measuring positions (M11 - M45), wherein an approximation which is as good as possible to an area boundary configuration (6, 6*) is produced from the measuring positions (M11 - M15;M41 - M45) and then taking same into account the ascertained measurement parameters are allocated to a co-ordinate grid proportionately as representative parameters, characterised in that for all pairs of adjacent measuring positions (M11, M12 - M14, M15), in accordance with those touching test areas, in particular test circles (T'1 - T'5;T*1 - T*5) a check is made by computing means as to whether no further measuring position (M21 - M25) falls into same, or for all measuring positions M11 - M45) in travel tracks (F1 - F4) corresponding to test areas, in particular test circles (T1 - T5) surrounding said measuring positions (M41 - M45) a check is made by computing means to ascertain whether they each intersect no other travel track at at least one side, wherein the test areas (T1 - T5;T'1 - T'5;T*1 - T*5) respectively have test dimensions, in particular a test radius, which are around a predetermined tolerance value (T) over a spacing from adjacent measuring positions (M11 - M45) or travel tracks (F1 - F4), and that all such measuring positions (M11 - M15;M41 - M45) in respect of which said test criterion is met are declared as boundary positions and the boundary side thereof is determined in accordance with the test and the best possible approximation to the outer and possibly inner boundary configuration is determined from the sequence of adjacent boundary positions. Procédé pour la cartographie assistée par ordinateur de grandeurs mesurées géoréférencées, en particulier de grandeurs de production agricole, qui ont été collectées dans une parcelle, en particulier le long de trajets de passage (F1 - F4), avec un dispositif de collecte, par exemple un dispositif de récolte, en étant associées à des positions de mesure individuelles (M11 - M45), la meilleure approximation possible d'un tracé de limite de parcelle (G, G*) étant obtenue à partir des positions de mesure (M11 - M15 ;M41 - M45) et, en tenant compte de celle-ci, les grandeurs mesurées collectées étant ensuite attribuées proportionnellement, comme grandeurs représentatives, à des points nodaux d'un réseau de coordonnées, caractérisé en ce que, pour toutes les paires de positions de mesure voisines (M11, M12 - M14, M15), on vérifie par le calcul, en fonction de zones de contrôle, en particulier de cercles de contrôle (T'1 - T'5 ;T*1 - T*5) touchant celles-ci, qu'aucune autre position de mesure (M21 - M25) ne s'y trouve ou, pour toutes les positions de mesure (M11 - M45) sur les trajets de passage (F1 - F4), on vérifie par le calcul, en fonction de zones de contrôle, en particulier de cercles de contrôle (T1 - T5) entourant ces positions de mesure (M41 - M45), qu'elles ne coupent aucun autre trajet de passage sur au moins un côté, les zones de contrôle (T1 - T5 ;T'1 - T'5 ;T*1 - T*5) présentant des dimensions de contrôle, en particulier un rayon de contrôle, qui sont supérieures d'une valeur de tolérance prévue (T) à l'écartement de positions de mesure (M11 - M45) ou de trajets de passage (F1 - F4) voisins, et en ce que toutes ces positions de mesure (M11 - M15 ;M41 - M45) pour lesquelles le critère de contrôle indiqué est rempli sont déclarées positions limites et leur côté limite est déterminé par contrôle, et la meilleure approximation possible du tracé de limite extérieur et éventuellement intérieur est réalisée à partir de la série de positions limites voisines. Verfahren zur computergestützten Kartierung georeferenzierter Meßgrößen, insbesondere landwirtschaftlicher Ertragsgrößen, die in einem Schlag, insbesondere entlang von Fahrspuren (F1 - F4), mit einer Erhebungsvorrichtung, z.B. einer Erntevorrichtung, einzelnen Meßpositionen (M11 - M45) zugeordnet erhoben worden sind, wobei aus den Meßpositionen (M11 - M15;M41 - M45) eine möglichst gute Annäherung an einen Schlaggrenzverlauf (6, 6*) erzeugt wird und dann diese berücksichtigend die erhobenen Meßgrößen Knotenpunkten eines Koordinatennetzes anteilig als Repräsentationsgrößen zugemessen werden, dadurch gekennzeichnet,daß für alle Paare benachbarter Meßpositionen (M11, M12 - M14, M15) rechnerisch entsprechend diesen berührenden Testarealen, insbesondere Testkreisen (T'1 - T'5;T*1 - T*5), geprüft wird, ob keine weitere Meßposition (M21 - M25) in dieses fällt, oder für alle Meßpositionen (M11 - M45) in Fahrspuren (F1 - F4) rechnerisch entsprechend mit diesen Meßpositionen (M41 - M45) umgebenden Testarealen, insbesondere Testkreisen (T1 - T5), geprüft wird, ob sie jeweils an mindestens einer Seite keine andere Fahrspur schneiden, wobei die Testareale (T1 - T5;T' 1 - T'5;T*1 - T*5) jeweils Testabmessungen, insbesondere einen Testradius, aufweisen, die um einen vorgesehenen Toleranzwert (T) über einem Abstand von benachbarten Meßpositionen (M11 - M45) oder Fahrspuren (F1 - F4) liegen, und daß alle solche Meßpositionen (M11 - M15;M41 - M45), bei denen das genannte Testkriterium erfüllt ist, als Grenzpositionen deklariert werden und deren Grenzseite testgemäß bestimmt wird und aus der Folge benachbarter Grenzpositionen die bestmögliche Annäherung an den äußeren und ggf. inneren Grenzverlauf bestimmt wird.
- 2A method according to claim 1 characterised in that the predetermined test radius for checking the spacing of respective mutually adjacent travel tracks (F3, F4) is determined from a working width (A) of the collecting apparatus plus the tolerance addition (D) or from the spacing of successively detected measuring positions (M11, M12) plus the tolerance addition (T). Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le rayon de contrôle prédéfini servant à contrôler l'écartement de deux trajets de passage voisins (F3, F4) est déterminé à partir d'une largeur de travail (A) du dispositif de collecte, augmentée de la majoration de tolérance (T), ou à partir de l'écartement de deux positions de mesure détectées successivement (M11, M12), augmenté de la majoration de tolérance (T). Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der vorgegebene Testradius zur Prüfung des Abstandes jeweils einander benachbarter Fahrspuren (F3, F4) aus einer Arbeitsbreite (A) der Erhebungsvorrichtung zuzüglich des Toleranzzuschlages (T) oder aus dem Abstand aufeinanderfolgend erfaßter Meßpositionen (M11, M12) zuzüglich des Toleranzzuschlages (T) bestimmt ist.
- 3A method according to claim 2 characterised in that a respective local working width (A41 - A45) is continuously measured or is specified by an operator of the collecting apparatus and said local working width (A41 - A45) is stored respectively associated with the measuring positions (M41 - M45) and the local test radius is determined from said stored local working widths. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que des largeurs de travail locales respectives (A41 - A45) sont mesurées en continu et entrées par un opérateur dans le dispositif de collecte, et ces largeurs de travail locales (A41 - A45) sont mémorisées en étant associées à chacune des positions de mesure (M41 - M45), et le rayon de contrôle local est déterminé à partir de ces largeurs de travail locales mémorisées. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß jeweils eine lokale Arbeitsbreite (A41 - A45) laufend gemessen oder von einem Bediener der Erhebungsvorrichtung angegeben wird und diese lokale Arbeitsbreite (A41 - A45) jeweils den Meßpositionen (M41 - M45) zugeordnet gespeichert wird, und aus diesen gespeicherten lokalen Arbeitsbreiten der lokale Testradius bestimmt wird.
- 4A method according to claim 3 characterised in that the best possible approximation of the area boundary configuration (G) along the travel tracks (F4) disposed at the boundary side is determined having regard to the local working width (A41 - A45). Procédé selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que la meilleure approximation possible du tracé de limite de parcelle (G) est déterminée le long des trajets de passage (F4) situés côté limite en tenant compte de la largeur de travail locale (A41 - A45). Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die bestmögliche Annäherung des Schlaggrenzverlaufes (G) entlang der grenzseitig gelegenen Fahrspuren (F4) die lokale Arbeitsbreite (A41 - A45) berücksichtigend bestimmt wird.
- 5A method according to one of the preceding claims characterised in that the best possible approximation of the test radius is so predetermined that a track-related eccentric position (E) of the measuring position locating apparatus on the collecting apparatus of the respectively adjacent travel tracks and the orientation thereof relative to each other is locally taken into consideration. Procédé selon une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la meilleure approximation possible du rayon de contrôle est prédéfinie de façon à tenir compte localement du positionnement excentré (E) par rapport au trajet du dispositif de repérage de position de mesure sur le dispositif de collecte des trajets de passage voisins concernés et de leur orientation réciproque. Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die bestmögliche Annäherung des Testradius so vorgegeben wird, daß eine spurbezogen exzentrische Lage (E) der Meßpositionsortungsvorrichtung auf der Erhebungsvorrichtung der jeweils benachbarten Fahrspuren und deren Orientierung zueinander lokal berücksichtigt ist.
- 6A method according to claim 5 characterised in that the respectively measured measuring positions (M41 - M45) and the track-related eccentric position (E) of the measuring position locating apparatus on the collecting apparatus are respectively stored in dependence on direction as a corrected measuring position (K11 - K45). Procédé selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que les positions de mesure respectives mesurées (M41 - M45) et le positionnement (E), excentré par rapport au trajet, du dispositif de repérage de position de mesure sur le dispositif de collecte, sont mémorisés chaque fois en fonction de la direction, en tant que position de mesure corrigée (K11 - K45). Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die jeweils gemessenen Meßpositionen (M41 - M45) die spurbezogene exzentrische Lage (E) der Meßpositionsortungsvorrichtung auf der Erhebungsvorrichtung jeweils richtungsabhängig als eine korrigierte Meßposition (K11 - K45) abgespeichert werden.
- 7A method according to one of claims 4 to 6 characterised in that the position of the measuring position locating apparatus in relation to the respective position of a working region is stored and evaluated. Procédé selon une des revendications 4 à 6, caractérisé en ce que le positionnement du dispositif de repérage de position de mesure par rapport au positionnement respectif de la zone de travail est mémorisé et analysé. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 4 bis 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Lage der Meßpositionsortungsvorrichtung in Bezug auf die jeweilige Lage eines Arbeitsbereiches abgespeichert und ausgewertet wird.
- 8A method according to claim 7 characterised in that the respectively measured measuring positions (M11 - M45) are stored and evaluated in centred relationship on the position of the respective working region. Procédé selon la revendication 7, caractérisé en ce que les positions de mesure mesurées (M11 - M45) sont mémorisées et analysées en étant centrées sur le positionnement de chaque zone de travail. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die jeweils gemessenen Meßpositionen (M11 - M45) auf die Lage des jeweiligen Arbeitsbereiches zentriert abgespeichert und ausgewertet werden.
- 9A method according to one of the preceding claims characterised in that the best possible approximation of the area boundary configuration (G, G*) is ascertained by a Graham enveloping algorithm or a quick enveloping method with the location coordinates (K11 - K15;K41 - K45) disposed at the boundary side and the respective working width (A;A41 - A45). Procédé selon une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la meilleure approximation possible du tracé de limite de parcelle (G, G*) est obtenue à l'aide d'un algorithme d'enveloppe de Graham ou d'un procédé de Quickhull avec les coordonnées locales situées côté limite (K11 - K15 ;K41 - K45) et avec la largeur de travail respective (A ;A41 - A45). Verfahren nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die bestmögliche Annäherung des Schlaggrenzverlaufs (G, G*) durch einen Einwickelalgorithmus von Graham oder ein Quickhullverfahren mit den grenzseitig gelegenen Ortskoordinaten (K11 - K15;K41 - K45) und der jeweiligen Arbeitsbreite (A;A41 - A45) ermittelt wird.
Independent claims9
33 paragraphs, as filed
The invention relates to a method for computer-assisted Mapping georeferenced variables, in particular agricultural output sizes, in one fell swoop particularly along lanes, with a Collection device, such as a harvester, single Measuring positions have been charged associated, from the Measuring positions the best possible approach to a Shock boundary line is produced and then these Considered the collected variables nodes of a coordinate grid be proportionately allotted as representation sizes.
As is known to be mapped area-based measurement data in Terrain, associated to the coordinates of individual Measuring positions, where each of a blow, and from this Survey is supported software with a computer a Maps showing the distribution of georeferenced variables generated, wherein an imaginary xy coordinate grid over the by mapping surface is spanned and the network nodes right from the measured data of adjacent measuring positions be representation variables associated. come this purpose individually or in combination, various methods for use as averaging, weighted averaging, a Interpolation or extrapolation or a geostatisches Methods such as the Kriging procedure. Proper application This method requires that the field borders respectively so far known that the membership of the individual Network nodes known to strike or to the external field is. To enter the courses of the field boundaries in the computer for example, those on a graphical input device of Hand drawn, mainly in big punches much time and requires patience. In order to reduce of the respectively necessary work is often earlier on already stored in a database of courses resorted to the field boundaries, but the extent need to be updated, as agricultural technical changes Field borders, eg due to management difficulties, as Impassability of roads of the soil when ordering or insufficient Profitability, have been made. This also requires large Property and local knowledge of the uplifting and the inputting Kartierers.
Also, a computerized mapping area-based measurement data without a separate input of Course of a blow-off but with their convergence Hüllverfahren made. Here, however, are considerable Inaccuracies in the outer boundary line occurred, and inner Boundary lines in non raisable areas were not considered.
The object of the invention to provide a much more accurate and to provide complete determination of the boundaries of impact.
The solution is that all pairs of adjacent for Measuring positions calculated in accordance with these touching Test areas, in particular test circles, it is checked whether any additional measurement position in this fall, or for all measurement positions in lanes constructed in accordance with this measurement positions surrounding test areas, in particular test circles, it is checked, whether they are each at least one side no other lane cut, the test areas each test dimensions, in particular a test radius, have that one set tolerance value over a distance of neighboring Measuring positions or lanes are, and that all such Measuring positions in which said test criterion is met, be declared limit positions and their side of the border is determined in accordance with test and adjacent from the episode Limiting positions the best possible approximation to the outer and possibly inner boundary line is determined.
Advantageous embodiments are in the dependent claims indicated.
The invention is based on the recognition that the collection of georeferenced size for each of the total of Shock occurs. For example, the crop yield measured, so the entire surface of the blow is to the breakdown limit harvested, while in the course of the track, for example, the harvester, at the individual measurement points of each in last path section yielded income measured there Location coordinates associated registers. Similarly, in the Order or process of blow along the guideway respective measurement locations associated measured values are collected, where the impact is covered by the processing as a whole.
From the acquired on the guideway location coordinates of Measuring positions, the course of the respectively adjacent determined roadway sections and from the distance, ie, Working width determined and from a distance threshold comparison are each with a limit overrun the border Track sections and therefore the best approximation to the Boundary line determined.
The method enables not only an outer boundary line define precisely but provides the analysis on Convergences and divergences of the adjacent track sections also the position of internal borders enclosed unprocessed Areas.
After determining the best approach to the breakdown limit (s) the assignment of the measured data to the nodes of the Coordinate grid in consideration of the border and the card issuing.
An improvement of this method is given if the respective working area of the agricultural machine in accordance with the Spacing of adjacent lanes either by driver input Vehicle operator or by a current working width measurement is also investigated as each, so that the local working width then than other known size into the equation for Distance threshold determination and the best approach to the shock boundary line is inserted.
The distance limit, which is used to verify whether a Lane is a lane boundary, is slightly larger than the to choose working width so that tolerances of tracking the Driving across the field for curved path curves and when Location measurement is not an erroneous limit position indicator to lead. In particular, a tolerance addition of 20% is per Railway track, so for the two adjacent tracks of a total 40% of the individual working width provided. Thus, if the Implement is a combine 9m wide, about 12.5 m as are predetermined distance limit. Thus, when a measurement point more 12.5 m from the adjacent lane, resulting from the episode the adjacent Meßpunktlagen results removed so a is Border trackpoint ago.
As the blows he in width not a whole Multiple of a working width corresponding, but usually also have an angle to each other extending borders, is often the working width of the border lane underused. Therefore, an advantageous improvement of the results Method, if in the detection of the measured values, in particular the Ertragsmeßwerte, the respective local working width is also measured and these according to the distance limit each is selected and in particular the best approximation of the Limit extension on the boundary track points taking into account the local working width is calculated.
A further increase in the accuracy of the boundary line determination is achieved when the position of the locating device, ie the receiving antenna with respect to the location of the Work area and the working width of the collection device be considered.
This is both in the determination of the distance limit as Also when determining the boundary curve significant.
Placing the aerial to the workspace of eccentrically Collection device, it is apparent on the back and forth a blow alternately a double to the eccentricity narrowed or extended distance of the trail of the measurement locations.
Accordingly, the distance limit is in opposing lanes according to the position of the eccentricity to the driving direction smaller or larger than the considered working width with define the tolerance surcharge. In addition, the Approximate calculation of the limit curve under consideration making the eccentricity with respect to the direction of travel and to improve.
An eccentricity of the position determination, ie the antenna location, for each workspace is advantageously directly in the Coordinate and measurement value taken into account by the the located coordinate values respectively for each workspace centered, so according to the width and location of the be corrected working area to the antenna stored. If the correction of the measurement location made immediately on site, so it is unnecessary to separate storage of location data Work area in the recording of measurement data, the Coordinate values and the working width. The distance limit to limit tracking determination is then always from the Sum of the half widths of the adjacent stored Meßpunktspuren excl. Of tolerance surcharge. For the approach the boundary curve is half the working width of the cross side stored Meßpunktespurenverlaufs considered.
The practical field working with a combine harvester preferably the measurement data and coordinate detection is used, is usually initiated by one or more Umrunduhgen wherein protrudes a part of the cutting mechanism across the border and there idles. This is accomplished by detecting the position of Work area and the working width continuously taken into account. The last lanes run then often obliquely into the already harvested a border zone, or it results in a narrower Working width, and the work area is the to the edges Total cutting mechanism spaced. All these data are locally measured and considered in the detection and even when adjacent to this area and this one unbearbeitbare Zone, is there through the border test the inner boundary layer recognized.
Instead of a distance limit testing adjacent lanes alternatively a distance limit testing of in any made other charges point coordinates by all Points pairs of adjacent points will determine whether these penetrating test circuits each at least one further Include measuring point. If this is not the case, it is by two boundary points, and the test circuit in question is located on the Border page. The design of the test circle radius depends again according to the usual Meßpunkteabstand which corresponds approximately to prescribed working width. It is further away assumed that the distance of the measuring points in the different Movement is similar, otherwise you have the tolerance award are appropriately selected or a suitable test area shape such. As an oval, are selected, the axis lengths are the Distances of the measuring points in both directions with a Tolerenzzuschlag are reasonable and the axes of the Dot arrangement are oriented accordingly. The distance between the Measurement points in the detection results usually depends on the speed of travel, as the coordinate signals each in be transmitted a fixed time cycle.
Since the point or lane clearance checks also those Areas on or exclude, for example. Technical, eg receiving technical, reasons not stored coordinate values could be, it is provided either in the Data acquisition corresponding noted items from the operator or to automatically save or interim report on outputting the identification of such acquisition and the Islands Operator, a decision on the inclusion or Elimination of the range in the more Zumessungsprozedur request.
The description of computational checking operation by means of Test areas, test circles or ellipses test is a Illustration; However, not circular or equations Ellipse equations are used, but it can also Distances between the adjacent points with circular or are calculated and tested triangular functions. <dl tsize="6" compact="compact"><dt>Fig. 1</dt><dd>shows a border area one sleeps ages,</dd><dt>FIG. 2</dt><dd>shows another area with lanes.</dd></dl>
FIG. 1 shows lanes (F1 - F4) in border areas. The adjacent lanes each have opposite Driving directions (R1 - R4) on. The measuring points (M11 - M15 - M41 - M45) are the actual Locating points located.
Since the antenna to the collection vehicle an eccentric position (E) to its center axis, are advantageously stored location coordinates (K11 - K15; K31 - K35) on the Vehicle center corrected since the landmark remote lanes (F1 - F3) the full working width (A) was used.
The boundary side preferred lane (F4) has decreased, variable, local working width (A41 - A45) which also eccentrically located, since the survey vehicle to Rest along the border (G) worked. Here are the stored location coordinates (K41 - K45) at the center of based actual workspace saved.
The check whether a boundary layer is present, is of the stored location coordinates (K41 - K45), taking into account the associated half stored local working width (A41- A45) and half the maximum working width (A) and the Tolerance margin (T) made. Accordingly, Test circuits (T1 - T5) to the stored position coordinates (K41 - K45) drawn, one on one side only Cut adjacent lane (F3), whereby the limit position for other side is displayed.
The best approximate boundary line (G) is the order of always afflicted with tolerances stored cross side Location coordinates (K41 - K45) and each halved, associated stored local working width (A41 - A45) determined by a suitable algorithm.
The determination of the local working width (A41 - A45) is before Place either automatically carried out by the signal of a Stock limit sensor is used on the collection vehicle, the often also for the automatic steering of the vehicle and / or Throughput control serves, or continuously by an operator at Changes is entered. Preferably, except the Working width, the position of the respective working zones within the track determined continuously. A particularly simple Considering these positional information for said Further processing occurs when the position of the measured centered coordinates to the location of the work area is stored corrected. The correction is made vertically for each direction of travel. There must no additional Size are stored.
Alternatively, the working width (A41 - A45), if they do not is also measured, from the convergence of adjacent lanes calculated. There are then the auxiliary position coordinates (H41 - H45) each centered stored on the full working width.
The distance (A * 41 - 45 * A) of the auxiliary location coordinates of the adjacent lane (F3) is calculated in each case; it corresponds the local working width (A41 - A45) in the context of metrological and mathematical tolerances. The bestgenäherte Boundary line (G) is accordingly to half the maximum Working width (A) in addition to the result of the cross side Auxiliary location coordinates (H41 - H45) to determine.
Another method for determining cross-sided Location coordinates (K11 - K15) is the test circuits (T * 1 - T * 5; T '1 - T'5) illustrates. This test circles intersect each two adjacent coordinates, and the outside location, Test circuit is empty, thus showing the boundary position of the points and the side of the course of the border (G *) to. If the Measurement points are collected sorted in lanes, can be the Test circuit test for practical application of point pair to pair of points, the test circuit thus quasi roll at points. Was at a Side of a lane to run the adjacent track determines the adequate neighborhood, it is sufficient in each case, perform the test on the other side.
After each then the closest possible approximation of the Border demarcation was recovered, the measured values collected can grenzsichtig with a compensation method, depending on the Area shares in the coordinate grid, the actual Hitting areas that are within the limit, mete out.
Fig. 2 shows another example of lanes (F * O - F * n) in near a breakdown limit (G '), which at the combine (MD) the detection departs. The initial track (F * O) exceeds Limit (G ') and has only one part of the working width. The measured spatial coordinates are therefore on the centering line (ZL) of the actually used workspace converted stored. After each cross another lane (F * 1) was cut free around the beat are as worn usually, more tracks with alternating direction, of which the penultimate track (F * n-1) still full working width (A) and the last track (F * n) only a partial working width (TB). This is with a lateral offset (V) to Side edge of the cutting unit (SW). Therefore, the measurement points are each of the true position of the locating device center (OG) a Central correction value (CC) on which the true center Workspace imaginary centering line added together with the local part of working width (TB) and the measured value raised registered.
2 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office |
|---|---|---|
| DE19532870A | Cites | Germany |
| DE4223585A | Cites | Germany |
10 members in 6 offices
Priority claims5
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19742463 | Germany | A | |
| 19742463 | Germany | A | |
| 19742463 | Germany | – | |
| 19742463 | – | – | – |
| DE1997142463 | – | – | – |
Members10
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP0905482A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| DE19742463A1 | Germany | A1 | |
| US6131069A | United States of America | A | |
| EP0905482A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| UA45444C2 | Ukraine | C2 | |
| RU2207750C2 | Russian Federation | C2 | |
| EP0905482B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE59812300D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DK0905482T3 | Denmark | T3 | |
| DE19742463B4 | Germany | B4 |
37 legal events, as 5 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Ep patent lapsedLapsedEBP | EBP | DK | |
| Declaration of willingness to licenceR084 | R084 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)GBT | GBT | EP | |
| Ep patent with danish claimsT3 | T3 | DK | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedNOT ENGLISHFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| Designation fees paidBE DE DK FR GBAKX | AKX | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SIAX | AX | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant7G 01C 21/20 A, 7A 01B 79/00 B, 7G 06T 17/50 BRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SIAX | AX | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0905482
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0905482
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0905482
- Application
- 98112920
- Application, DOCDB
- 98112920
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19980112920
Titles3
- German
- Verfahren zur computergestützten Kartierung
- English
- Method for computer assisted cartography
- French
- Méthode pour la cartographie assistée par ordinateur
Classification
- CPC, 1
- G01C21/20
- IPC, 5
- A01D91 00
- A01B79 00
- A01D41 00
- G01C21 20
- G06T17 05
Designated states5
- Contracting states, 5
- Belgium
- Germany
- Denmark
- France
- United Kingdom
