Method for preventing counterfeiting of articles of manufacture
Abstract
A method for verifying the source of an article of manufacture. A label having information relating to the article is prepared and digitally signed or otherwise encrypted to authenticate the information. The label and a tangible representation of the digital signature or other encrypted information are then securely associated with the article. The information relating to the article can include verifying information such as an expiration date, unique identification of the article, identification of an authorized provider of the article or a description of the article to protect against unauthorized use of duplicate labels. The label can also include an unreproduceable pattern such as a pattern of magnetic fibers embedded in the label and a digitally signed description of the pattern.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 1 July 2018, 8.2 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
11 claims: 3 independent, 8 dependent
- 1A method for verifying the source of an article of manufacture, said method comprising the steps of:a) preparing a label, said label including information relating to said article;b) encrypting at least a portion of said information included on said label;c) securely associating said article, said label, and a tangible representation of said encrypted information.
- 2A method described in Claim 1 wherein said information included on said label includes verifying information for protecting against unauthorized use of duplicate labels.
- 3A method as described in Claim 2 wherein said verifying information includes information consisting of:an expiration date, a unique identification of said article of manufacture, an identification of a provider of said article of manufacture, or information describing said article of manufacture.
- 4A method as described in Claim 1 wherein said label further includes an unreproduceable pattern and said method includes the further step of including a description of said unreproduceable pattern with said information included on said label.
- 5A method as described in Claim 4 wherein said unreproduceable pattern is formed from magnetic fibers embedded in said label.
- 6A method as described in Claim 4 wherein said encrypted information is encrypted with a first private key of a first public/private key pair and a corresponding first public key is available to parties who wish to validate the source of said article.
- 7A method as described in Claim 6 wherein a trusted third party provides a party producing said label with said first private key and with an encryption of said first public key by a second private key kept secret by said trusted third party, said producing party including said encryption of said first public key with said label and said trusted third party providing a corresponding second public key to parties who wish to verify the source of said article;whereby said parties can recover said first public key from said label so that articles from a large number of different sources can be verified without the need to maintain a corresponding database of public keys.
- 8A method as described in Claim 1 wherein said encrypted information is encrypted with a first private key of a first public/private key pair and a corresponding first public key is available to parties who wish to validate the source of said article.
- 9A method as described in Claim 8 wherein a trusted third party provides a party producing said label with said first private key and with an encryption of said first public key by a second private key kept secret by said trusted third party, said producing party including said encryption of said first public key with said label and said trusted third party providing a corresponding second public key to parties who wish to verify the source of said article;whereby said parties can recover said first public key from said label so that articles from a large number of different sources can be verified without the need to maintain a corresponding database of public keys.
- 10A method for labeling an article, said method comprising the steps of:a) providing a label for said article, said label having an unreproduceable pattern;b) scanning said label to generate a signal representative of said unreproduceable pattern;c) encrypting at least a portion of said signal;d) securely associating a tangible representation of said encrypted portion of said signal, said article and said label.
- 11A method for verifying a label, said label having an unreproduceable pattern, and a tangible representation of at least an encrypted portion of a signal description of said unreproduceable pattern being securely associated with said label, said method comprising the steps of:a) scanning said label to generate a second signal descriptive of said unreproduceable pattern;b) reading said tangible representation to recover said encrypted portion of said descriptive signal;c) decrypting said encrypted portion, or encrypting a corresponding portion of said second signal;and d) comparing said decrypted portion of said descriptive signal with said corresponding portion of said second signal, or comparing said encrypted portion of said descriptive signal with said corresponding encrypted portion of said second signal, to verify said label.
Independent claims11
27 paragraphs, as filed
0001The subject invention relates to labeling of articles. More particularly, it relates to a method for labeling articles of manufacture to identify their source and prevent counterfeiting.
0002Counterfeiting and forgery of goods are well known problems. Manufacturers of luxury goods such as watches, luggage, perfume, etc. must constantly deal with counterfeiters who produce cheap imitations. And even inexpensive goods such as T-shirts can acquire considerable cachet, and associated high markup, by being marked with the image of a famous cartoon character, or other valuable, proprietary logo.
0003While the counterfeiting of consumer goods or other articles of manufacture thus represents a problem which is probably comparable to problems associated with the counterfeiting of documents which represent value (e.g., currency), until recently no comparable efforts have been made to combat this problem. While there is a long history of techniques such as elaborate engraving and use of special paper stocks to prevent counterfeiting of currency, in general similar efforts have not been used even for the most expensive luxury goods.
0004Another approach which has been used to combat counterfeiting of documents is the use of encryption. U.S. Patent No. 4,853,961; to: Pastor; issued: Dec. 18, 1987 describes one method for encrypting information extracted from a document and imprinting the document with the encrypted information in order to verify the information contained in the document. Similarly, U.S. Patent No. 5,388,158, issued: February 7, 1995; to: William Berson teaches a method wherein a document is scanned to produce a digital signal which is compressed, encrypted, and coded as a two dimensional bar code, which is incorporated into a label which is affixed to the document.
0005While these and other similar methods have been useful for their intended purpose, that purpose has been limited to the verification of the information content of a document. In general, those who use such techniques either are not concerned that the information be duplicated so long as it is not altered, or, as with currency, are willing to rely on other techniques to detect duplication. Since much of the value of the sort of articles of manufacture which are likely to be counterfeited inheres in the fact that each particular item is essentially indistinguishable from other items of the same type, there has been, to applicant's best knowledge, no previous attempt to use encryption techniques to verify the source of articles of manufacture.
0006Another related use of encryption relates to the identification of individuals. Commonly assigned, co-pending European patent application No. 0599558; by: Marcus; filed; November 19, 1993 describes an identification card which includes an encrypted representation of a biometric characteristic of an individual to be identified (e.g., a fingerprint or facial image). This encrypted representation is decrypted and compared to the individual. Again, since articles of manufacture which are likely to be counterfeited in general do not have distinguishing characteristics, applicant believes that there has been no effort to apply such techniques to the problem of verifying the source of an article of manufacture. (Even if an article includes a unique marking such as a serial number, in general there is no convenient way to determine if the serial number is original or a duplication.)
0007Thus, it is an object of the subject invention to provide a method whereby encryption techniques may be used to verify the source of articles of manufacture.
0008The above object is achieved, and the disadvantages of the prior art are overcome in accordance with the subject invention by mans of a method which includes the steps of preparing a label which includes information relating to an article of manufacture and encrypting at least a portion of the information. The article, the label, and a tangible representation of the encrypted information are then securely associated.
0009As used herein, the term "label" includes not only conventional labels which are glued or otherwise affixed to an article but also includes the marking which is associated with the article and which is sufficiently likely to remain associated with the article through the period of interest. For example, the label for an expensive watch or piece of jewelry may be engraved on the article itself, while the label for a relatively inexpensive appliance may be printed on the shipping carton.
0010Also, as used herein "securely associating" means that the article, label, and the tangible representation of the encrypted information are associated in a manner such that the likely expense and difficulty of trying to separate and reuse the label and tangible representation will exceed any benefit which can be obtained thereby.
0011In accordance with one aspect of the subject invention, the information included on the label includes verifying information, such as expiration date, a particularly identification of the article such as a serial number, an identification of an authorized provider of the article, or a description of the article, while protecting against unauthorized use of duplicate labels.
0012In accordance with another aspect of the subject invention, the label includes an unreproduceable pattern and the method includes the further step of including an encrypted description of the unreproduceable pattern with the encrypted information.
0013In accordance with another aspect of the subject invention, the encrypted information is encrypted with a private key of a public/private key pair and the corresponding public key is available to parties who wish to validate the source of the article.
0014Those skilled in the art will recognize that the above object is achieved, and that the disadvantages of prior art are overcome by the subject invention. Other objects and advantages of the subject invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the attached drawings and the detailed description set forth below. <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>Fig. 1 is a semi-schematic plan view of a label used in practicing the method of the subject invention.</li></ul>
0015Fig. 1 shows label 10 which can be used in accordance with the subject invention to verify the source of an article of manufacture. Label 10 can include conventional logo 12 and/or brand name 14, as well as any other information which might normally be found on a product label. Additionally, in one embodiment of the subject invention, verifying information is included in field 16, 20, 22, and 24. These fields might contain, for example, a serial number uniquely identifying a particular article, a description of such article in terms of size, color, model, etc., the identity of an authorized provider or reseller of such an article, or an expiration date beyond which a sale would not be authorized. As will be described further below, such verifying information provides a degree of protection against the unauthorized use of duplicate labels since a particular label will have only limited usefulness in terms of the time, place, or articles with which it may be used. (Though it has been noted above that serial numbed have had limited usefulness in preventing counterfeiting of articles of manufacture, a serial number can be useful where articles are sold in large lots since a counterfeiter would need to copy labels for each item in a lot.)
0016All, or selected portions, of the information on label 10 is then replicated in a scannable form in field 28. Preferably, the information is replicated in the form of a two dimensional bar code such as is specified in the well known PDF 417 standard. All, or selected parts, of the information on label 10 is then digitally signed in a conventional manner in field 30.
0017In accordance with the subject invention, a manufacturer or authorized provider of an article of manufacture prepares a label such as shown in Fig. 1 using an encryption key which the manufacturer or other authorized provider keeps in secret. Label 10 is then securely associated with the article; typically by affixing it to the article so that it cannot be removed without destroying it.
0018It should be noted that other methods of securely associating label 10 with the article, such as printing it on a container for the article, are also within any contemplation of the subject invention. Further, label 10 need not comprise a single element. For example, the information in field 28 and/or the digital signature in field 30 may be printed on an invoice or manifest which accompanies the article. As noted above, secure association of label 10 with an article of manufacture requires only that it be made sufficiently difficult or expensive in some manner so that it is likely that the cost of unauthorized reuse of label 10 will exceed any benefit.
0019While the use of verifying information as described above limits the ability of a counterfeiter to use duplicate labels, some articles of particularly great value may require more nearly total protection. This is achieved in accordance with one embodiment of the subject invention by incorporation of an unreproduceable pattern in or on label 10. Such a pattern is shown as elements 32 in Fig. 1. Preferably elements 32 are magnetic fibers as are described in U.S. Patent No. 5,003,291; to: Strom-Olsen; issued: March 26, 1991 which is hereby incorporated by reference, which is incorporated in the stock on which label 10 is printed when the stock is manufactured. Since the fibers are randomly distributed through the stock as it is formed, the distribution pattern of such fibers in a particular label cannot be reproduced without extraordinary effort. When the label is produced, unreproduceable pattern 32 is scanned and a tangible representation, which is preferably a barcode representation, is incorporated in field 34 and digitally signed together with the information in field 28. A very high degree of confidence of the authenticity of label 10 may then be achieved by scanning patterns 32 and comparing it to the description in field 34. Verification of the description in field 34 will then verify the authenticity of label 10.
0020Methods for detecting the presence of magnetic fibers are known and are described in the above-referenced U.S. Patent No. 5,003,291 and a sufficiently precise description may be generated by scanning label 10 with a detector having a sufficiently small aperture.
0021Other methods of producing an unreproduceable pattern are known; one of the simplest being simply to spatter a sheet of paper stock with drops of ink or paint. Any such method which can be described and scanned with sufficient precision is within contemplation of the subject invention; where the degree of precision needed is determined by the desired degree of protection, since clearly the more precisely the unreproduceable pattern is described, the more difficult it will be to approximate.
0022In another preferred embodiment of the subject invention, the information on label 10 is digitally signed using the private key of a public/private key pair. (Public/private key encryption is a known encryption technique where one key of a key pair is used to encrypt data and the other to decrypt the data and the private key cannot be determined from knowledge of the data and the public key.) Thus, the public key may be made widely available while the private key is kept in secret so that articles of manufacture may be readily verified in accordance with the subject invention but can only be so labeled by a manufacturer or authorized provider having knowledge of the private key.
0023One disadvantage of such a system is that where a large a number of parties are providing articles to a single party for verification. The verifying party is then faced with the problem of maintaining a database of public keys for each of the providing parties. This problem can be overcome in accordance with another embodiment of the subject invention by means of a "nested key" system, wherein a trusted third party delivers distinct private, encryption keys to each of the providing parties together with a corresponding decryption key which has been encrypted with the third party's private, encryption key. The providing parties then digitally sign label 10 as described above and incorporate the encrypted decryption key on label 10. Any party wishing to verify label 10 need only have knowledge of the trusted third party's public, decryption key to recover the decryption key needed to verify digitally signed label 10.
0024The method of the subject invention may also be used to control the production of articles by licensees of trademarks or other intellectual property. The trademark licenser may control the supply of labels to the trademark licensee to control or monitor the number of articles produced. Alternatively, the licensee may label the articles as described above while the licenser controls the process of digitally signing the labels.
0025It should also be noted that stock having an unreproduceable pattern in combination with an encrypted or digitally signed description of that pattern can be used to produce valuable documents such as currency, or security tapes used to provide evidence of tampering.
0026Digital signing is a well known technique for showing that information has not been changed, wherein a portion of the information selected by a "hash function" is encrypted to provide a "digital signature". By again applying the "hash function" to the information and comparing the result to the decrypted signature the information may be verified. However, other protocols wherein all or part of the particular information is encrypted in order to assure its authenticity are known and such techniques are within the contemplation of the sub-convention.
0027The embodiments described above have been provided by way of illustration only and other embodiments of the sub-convention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the above detailed description and the attached drawings. Accordingly, limitations on the subject invention are to be found only in the claims set forth below.
2 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP1586463A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| DE102007016329A1 | Cited by | Germany | Applicant |
| WO0239653A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO03098543A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP1965341A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO0115097A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| DE10305430A1 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| WO2012160571A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US9597620B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP2743893A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO2007074142A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2009141363A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| FR2915600A1 | Cited by | France | Search report |
| US7497379B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO02061677A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US7878398B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7444007B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| FR2835128A1 | Cited by | France | Search report |
| DE19920744A1 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| US7383864B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP1770656A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| EP1980977A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| WO0239653A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP1965341A4 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO0143086A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| JP2005297373A | Cited by | Japan | Examiner |
| WO2015170290A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US7577844B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| FR2996660A1 | Cited by | France | Search report |
| EP1770656A3 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO0109830A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2008142307A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US8392715B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2009074342A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| FR2916887A1 | Cited by | France | Search report |
| US8235286B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP1513112A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO2005101330A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2009074342A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP1804195A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO2008046947A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
| US7051206B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2013076731A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US7336806B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| JP2009536467A | Cited by | Japan | Examiner |
| WO2008142307A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP1513112A3 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO2014090804A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2013076731A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO2004070682A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO02061677A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US9323960B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6928552B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US8942372B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO0023954A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP1586463A3 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| US8297521B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO2004070682A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP0276814A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| EP0372692A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| EP0599558A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Applicant |
| EP0632398A2 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| US4816824A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US4853961A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5003291A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5380047A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| US5388158A | Cites | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5388158A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
| WO8002757A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
| WO9119614A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
8 members in 4 offices; this record represents the family
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 88651697 | United States of America | A | |
| 886516 | United States of America | – | |
| US19970886516 | – | – | – |
| 886516 | – | – | – |
Members8
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2242671A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| EP0889448A2This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP0889448A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| EP0889448B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE69819243D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE69819243T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| US6904525B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| CA2242671C | Canada | C |
29 legal events, as 4 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal feeWithdrawnR119 | R119 | DE | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRAGRAH | GRAH | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Designation fees paidDE FR GBAKX | AKX | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant7G 07F 7/08 A, 7G 07C 1/00 B, 7G 06K 19/14 BRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SIAX | AX | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Request for extension of the european patentAL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SIAX | AX | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0889448
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0889448
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0889448
- Application
- 98112153
- Application, DOCDB
- 98112153
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19980112153
Titles3
- German
- Verfahren zum Verhindern von Fälschungen an hergestellten Gegenständen
- English
- Method for preventing counterfeiting of articles of manufacture
- French
- Procédé pour empêcher la falsification d'articles de fabrication
Classification
- CPC, 8
- G07F7/125
- G06K19/086
- G06K19/14
- G07C1/00
- G07D7/0047
- G07D7/04
- G07D7/20
- G07F7/086
- IPC, 7
- G06K19 14
- G07C1 00
- G07D7 00
- G07D7 04
- G07D7 20
- G07F7 08
- G07F7 12
Designated states25
- Contracting states, 19
- Germany
- France
- United Kingdom
- Austria
- Belgium
- Switzerland
- Cyprus
- Denmark
- Spain
- Finland
- Greece
- Ireland
- Italy
- Liechtenstein
- Luxembourg
- Monaco
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Portugal
- Sweden
- Extension states, 6
- Albania
- Lithuania
- Latvia
- North Macedonia
- Romania
- Slovenia