Method of producing diamond-like-carbon coatings
Abstract
A plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition process is presented, wherein a precursor gas stream has a high helium content and produces hard, wear resistant, hermetically sealing, high refractive index Diamond-Like-Carbon (DLC) coatings on numerous substrates at relatively high deposition rates. The process may be applied to both batch and linear production methods. Linear products such as optical fibers, capillary tubing, wires, and sheets can be coated in-line while minimizing the introduction of flaws on their surfaces and minimizing exacerbation of any pre-existing flaws. The effects of surface flaws can be minimized further by introducing a helium etch of the substrate surface prior to exposure to the DLC coating precursor gas mixture. DLC coated products can be produced with the desired properties at commercially attractive deposition rates.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 25 March 2016, 10.5 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
10 claims: 6 independent, 4 dependent
- 1A method for producing Diamond-Like-Carbon (DLC) coatings on a substrate, said method characterized by introducing a substrate into a reaction chamber having an interior pressure between 1 and 10 Torr, mixing a carbonaceous reactant gas mixture with He to form a precursor gas with said precursor gas comprising at least 40% He by volume, facilitating deposition of the DLC coating onto the substrate by means of plasma created from said precursor gas and created by radio frequency inducing means in close proximity to said substrate, and flowing said precursor gas in said reaction chamber in close proximity to said substrate and said plasma-inducing means and at such a flow rate that a DLC coating is deposited on said substrate.
- 6A method for producing Diamond-Like-Carbon (DLC) coatings on a linear substrate, said method characterized by drawing of the linear substrate into a reaction chamber from a draw tower in a continuous stream through vacuum-containing gates with said reaction chamber having an interior pressure between 1 and 10 Torr, mixing a carbonaceous reactant gas mixture with He to form a precursor gas being at least 40% He by volume, facilitating deposition of the DLC coating onto the substrate by means of plasma created from said precursor gas and created by radio frequency inducing means in close proximity to said substrate, and flowing said precursor gas in said reaction chamber in close proximity to said substrate and said plasma-inducing means and at such a flow rate that a DLC coating is deposited on said substrate.
Independent claims8
23 paragraphs, as filed
0001The field of this invention is plasma assisted chemical vapor deposition of diamond-like-carbon (DLC) coatings applied to individual substrates, such as integrated chips, or to linear substrates such as fibers, wires, tubes, and sheets. In particular, methods are given which produce DLC coatings that can protect substrates, can function as hermetic coatings, and can be applied to individual and linear substrates.
0002Due to their hardness and wear resistance DLC films [A. Grill, "Review of the tribology of diamond-like carbon," <i>Wear</i>, <i>168</i> (<b>1993</b>)143-153] are used as protective coatings with applications ranging from IR optics to cutting tools. In addition, because of their amorphous structure and lack of grain boundaries they can also act as hermetic coatings with applications ranging from vapor barriers coatings on plastics to protective coatings preventing the diffusion of small gas molecules into optical fibers. These advantages are particularly important when fibers are imbedded in an application without plastic jackets. An example would be optical fibers used in optical gyroscopes; as temperatures change DLC coatings keep the fiber from being damaged. Another usage is where tight windings for small, compact packaging is required, as in guided missile payout tethers.
0003A range of techniques have been developed to deposit these coatings, including magnetron sputtering, neutral atom beam, dc discharges, and radio frequency (rf) discharges. A.C. Evans, J. Franks and P.J. Revell, "Diamond-like carbon applied to bioengineering materials," <i>Surface and Coating Technology, 47</i> (<b>1991</b>) 662-667, A. Grill, V. Patel and B. Meyerson, "Tribological behavior of diamond-like carbon: effects of preparation conditions and annealing," <i>Surface and Coatings Technology, 49</i> (<b>1991</b>) 530-536. Of these techniques, rf plasmas have been most widely used. The majority of work has been at 13.56 MHz, but work at lower frequencies, 2.3 to 3.75 MHz has yielded similar results for given film compositions. Typical depositions employ hydrocarbon pressures ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 Torr and rf powers of about 1 W/cm<sup>2</sup> over the cathode area. At higher pressures film quality deteriorates, i.e., hardness, wear resistance, and other useful properties are compromised.
0004Desirable film properties, such as hardness, scratch resistance and wear resistance, generally require that the film strongly adheres to the substrate. Plasma pretreatment has been reported in the literature as a technique to enhance film adhesion. In particular argon plasma etching has been used for substrate pretreatment before DLC film deposition. D.M. Grant, et. al., "Plasma assisted CVD for biomedical applications," <i>Diamond and Related Materials 1</i> (<b>1992</b>) 727-730. This pretreatment is limited, however, to pressures of less than 0.1 Torr. Experimental results at higher pressures, e.g., between 0.5 and 7.0 Torr, demonstrated that argon pretreatment actually reduced film adhesion below that achieved using no argon pretreatment.
0005The quality of DLC coatings can be assessed by measuring the hardness, scratch resistance and wear resistance of the film It was discovered that these properties correlate with a film's refractive index, which can be obtained using ellipsometry. Low refractive index films, typically with n in the range 1.78 to 1.85 measured with a wavelength of 675 nm, are soft, have low wear resistance and are easily scratched. Higher index films, with n up to 2.45, are hard and wear resistant and are difficult to scratch.
0006Linear products such as optical fibers, capillary tubing, wires or sheets, present particular coating problems for the present state of the art. Coatings applied at or near atmospheric pressures are relatively soil. To produce DLC coatings with high hardness, low pressure must be used (high vacuum). Due to the difficult problem of obtaining relatively high vacuums in an in-line manufacturing system - e.g., when an optical fiber is drawn through a DLC deposition system - linear substrates must be coated at very slow deposition rates. The high vacuum requirement can cause the introduction of flaws, or the further opening of existing microscopic imperfections, on the substrate's surface as the linear product is drawn through a tight-fitting entry gate into the low-pressure deposition areas, or through multiple gates into increasingly lower pressure areas until the deposition area is reached.
0007The above mentioned problems have hindered the acceptance of DLC coated optical fibers for many applications. The present invention removes these difficulties.
0008The objectives of the invention are as follows: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li>1. To provide a process wherein hard: wear-resistant diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings can be produced at elevated gas pressures and elevated rates of deposition.</li><li>2. To provide a process wherein hard, wear resistant, DLC coatings can be produced in-line on linear products at elevated gas pressures and elevated rates of deposition.</li><li>3. To provide a process wherein a hermetic DLC coating is applied to linear products at elevated gas pressures and elevated rates of deposition.</li><li>4. To provide a process wherein hermetic DLC coatings are applied to individual substrates at relatively elevated pressures and at elevated deposition rates.</li></ul>
0009The present invention provides a plasma aided chemical vapor deposition process, wherein a precursor gas stream having a high helium content produces strong, wear resistant, hermetic, and high refractive index DLC coatings on numerous substrates and at relatively high deposition rates. Such methods may be used with both batch and in-line production techniques. With linear products such as optical fibers, capillary tubing, wires, and sheets the methods allow coating in-line while minimizing introduction of external flaws or the exacerbation of existing flaws on the substrate surfaces. Effects of flaws on the product surface can be minimized further by introducing a helium etch of the surface prior to exposure to the DLC coating precursor gas mixture. Thus, strong and hermetic DLC coated products may be produced at commercially attractive deposition rates and without significantly reducing the substrate's initial strengths.
0010The present invention should be more fully understood when the specification herein is taken in conjunction with the drawings appended thereto, wherein: <ul id="ul0002" list-style="none" compact="compact"><li><b>Figure 1</b> illustrates how a DLC film's refractive index varies with acetylene concentration at a constant helium flow.</li><li><b>Figure 2</b> illustrates how a DLC film's refractive index varies with deposition rates at a constant acetylene partial pressure.</li><li><b>Figure 3</b> presents a schematic of a preferred embodiment of the deposition process wherein optical fibers are coated with a DLC coating.</li><li><b>Figure 4</b> presents a more detailed cross sectional view of the deposition chamber in Figure 3.</li></ul>
0011Intense plasmas form at high pressures, often raising substrate temperatures beyond the substrate's ability to resist thermal damage. Incorporation of any inert gas, such as argon or helium, into the reactive mixtures causes a cooling effect, moderating the effects of the intense plasma. To improve film growth rates and properties at higher pressures, inert gases were added to reactant hydrocarbon and hydrogen gas mixtures. Experimentally it was determined that when argon was added, it had a deleterious affect on film quality. Refractive indices were low and films were soil. In contrast film growth rates and film quality improved with the addition of helix It was also experimentally established that useful rf initiated plasmas could be created using frequency ranges between 10 kHz and 100 kHz. Results using He as the inert gas and an rf frequency of 40 kHz are exemplified in <b>Table 1</b> for deposition of films from methane/hydrogen/helium gas mixtures at a total gas pressure of approximately 1 Torr for each experiment. <tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><table frame="all"><title>Table 1</title><tgroup cols="7" colsep="1" rowsep="1"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="22.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center">Exp. No.</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">Pressure, Torr</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">CH<sub>4</sub>, sccm</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center">H<sub>2</sub>, sccm</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center">He, sccm</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="center">Growth, mm/hr</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="center">R. Index, n</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">1</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.8</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">32</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">60</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="left">None</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">0.15</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">2.28</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">2</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.9</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">32</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">60</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="left">60</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">0.45</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">2.25</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">3</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.9</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">13</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">60</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="left">None</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">1.65</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">2.09</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">4</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.9</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">13</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">60</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="left">60</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">1.08</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">2.23</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0012The effect of helium on film growth rates is illustrated by comparing the results of experiments 1 and 2. In both the flow of methane and that of hydrogen were held constant at 32 sccm and at 60 sccm respectively. The total gas pressure was substantially constant at 0.8-0.9 Torr. In experiment 1 without any helium, a film with a refractive index n of 2.28 was produced at a growth rate of 0.15 mm/hour. Addition of helium at a flow rate of 60 sccm yielded a film with an essentially equivalent refractive index of n=2.25, but a three times faster growth rate of 0.45 mm/hour.
0013The effect of helium on film quality is illustrated by comparing the results of experiments 3 and 4. At a lower flow rate for methane, compared to the previous experiments, a faster growth rate was observed but with a reduction of the refractive index, indicating a coating with a reduced degree of the desired properties of DLC coatings. Here an addition of helium improves the refractive index of the film, while the growth rate is only slightly diminished.
0014In another series of experiments, acetylene was used as a hydrocarbon precursor gas. Growth rates as fast as 4.5 mm/hour were observed with a total pressures of about 1 Torr and acetylene/helium ratios of approximately 1:4. Films made under these conditions had refractive indices of about 1.84. For a number of varying levels of gas pressure and flow rates, addition of helium produced higher growth rates and films with higher refractive indices than when the helium was excluded. At a constant helium flow of 300 sccm, film refractive index variation with changes in deposition parameters could be measured. For example, the effect of varying acetylene concentration on resultant film refractive index is shown in <b>Figure 1</b>. As the flow rate of acetylene increases from 7 sccm to 40 sccm, the refractive index of the deposited film decreases from 2.01 to 1.84.
0015The effects of helium addition is even more dramatic at pressures greater than 1 Torr. Homogeneous DLC films with refractive indices up to 1.99 can be obtained at pressures as high as 5 Torr. At this pressure without helium, only very soft, non homogeneous films are normally deposited. <b>Table 2</b> presents the deposition conditions and film properties of several films deposited at 5 Torr using the current invention. <tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><table frame="all"><title>Table 2</title><tgroup cols="7" colsep="1" rowsep="1"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="22.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center">Exp. No.</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>, sccm</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">H<sub>2</sub>, sccm</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center">He, sccm</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center">Power, W</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="center">R. Index, n</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="center">Growth, mm/hr</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">5</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">13</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="left">None</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">500</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">25</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">1.90</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">1.7</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">6</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">13</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="left">None</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">150</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">25</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">1.86</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">3.0</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">7</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">13</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="left">80</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">300</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">32.5</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">1.70</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">2.7</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">8*</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">32/CH<sub>4</sub></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="left">90</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">297</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">32.5</entry><entry namest="col6" nameend="col6" align="char" char=".">1.99</entry><entry namest="col7" nameend="col7" align="char" char=".">0.2</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="justify">Total pressure in each experiment was 5 Torr. </entry></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup cols="7" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="22.50mm" /><colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="22.50mm" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="justify">*Experiment 8 used methane as the hydrocarbon source.</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0016While high refractive indices were obtainable with methane as a hydrocarbon source shown in <b>Table 2</b>, growth rates tended to be slow. As a result acetylene is a preferable hydrocarbon source.
0017<b>Figure 1</b> shows the results of two sets of experiments were the flow rate of the carbon-carrying precursor gas, acetylene, was varied while three other variables related to hardness and deposition rates were held constant: pressure in the deposition camber at 0.9 Torr; the helium flow rate at 300 sccm; and, the rf frequency at 40 kHz. The power used by the rf frequency generator was varied, with one set of tests run with 32.5W and the other set run with 50.0W as indicated in the figure. `his figure shows the desirability of using the higher power rf frequency generator setting to gain better DLC (higher n) properties when attempting to maize acetylene flow rates.
0018<b>Figure 2</b> presents a plot of refractive index versus deposition rate for films using an acetylene-based precursor gas. <b>Figure 2's</b> data was recorded using the following range of deposition conditions: <tables id="tabl0003" num="0003"><table frame="all"><tgroup cols="2" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="78.75mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="78.75mm" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Pressure:</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">5 Torr</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">rf Power:</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">17-37W</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">H<sub>2</sub> Flow Rate:</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">50-400 sccm</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">He Flow Rate</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">75-750 sccm</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub> Flow Rate:</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="left">1-20 sccm</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
0019Graph point <b>A</b> shows a DLC film deposition rate of 3.0 mm/hour where the resultant film has a refractive index, n, of 1.86. Graph points <b>B</b> show generally what happened when hydrogen was used as well as acetylene and helium; the resultant DLC films all had n less than 1.7 indicating a relatively soil coating. Graph point <b>C</b> shows a resultant DLC film having similar n as point <b>A</b> but with a significantly lower deposition rate: 300 nm/hr as compared with point <b>A</b>'s 3000 nm/hr (3.0 mm/hour). This makes a significant difference in the production of the coated fibers as explained in the next paragraph.
0020A DLC layer 25 nm deep is needed to achieve a hermetic coating. If the plasma field inside a deposition chamber has a length of 5 meters and the deposition chamber is held at 5 Torr, the total time the fiber should spend in the plasma using the precursor gas indicated by point <b>A</b> is: (hr/3000 nm)(60 min/hr) (25 nm) = 0.5 min. That gives a draw speed through the 5 meter plasma field of 10 m/min. Using the precursor gas mixture indicated by point <b>C</b> rather than point <b>A</b> the draw rate would be reduced by an order of magnitude, to 1 m/min. This is a significant commercial difference in manufacturing rates.
0021<b>Figure 3</b> shows a preferred embodiment of DLC deposition system <b>1</b>. Fiber preform <b>2</b> is pulled through draw oven <b>3</b> to form uncoated fiber <b>4</b>. Portals <b>8, 19, 20, 21,</b> and <b>22</b> are made using scratch-flee seals. Uncoated fiber <b>4</b> is drawn through portal <b>8</b> into evacuation chamber <b>5</b> and then through portal <b>19</b> into surface preparation chamber <b>6</b>. Helium is brought into preparation chamber <b>6</b> via inlet <b>9</b> and is evacuated via outlet <b>11</b>. While traveling through surface preparation chamber <b>6</b>, the helium traverses a plasma field which is generated between rf electrodes <b>14</b>. Uncoated fiber <b>4</b>, now having a helium surface etch, is drawn through portal <b>20</b> into deposition chamber <b>7</b>. Precursor gas is drawn into deposition chamber <b>7</b> via inlet <b>12</b>, through the plasma field generated by rf electrodes <b>24</b>, and expelled after reaction via outlet <b>13</b>. DLC coated fiber <b>25</b> is drawn through portal <b>21</b> into evacuation chamber <b>23</b>. DLC coated fiber <b>25</b> is then drawn through portal <b>22</b> to exit the DLC deposition area. DLC coated fiber <b>25</b> may then be optionally drawn through an addition coating or cladding chamber <b>15</b>, then optionally through a U-V treatment chamber <b>16</b>, around pinchwheel <b>17</b> and is finally wound by take-up spool <b>18</b>.
0022<b>Figure 4</b> is a cross-section of DLC deposition chamber <b>41</b>. A precursor gas is introduced via gas inlet <b>42</b>. As the gas passes through DLC deposition chamber <b>41</b> to gas outlet <b>43</b>, it passes between rf electrodes <b>44</b> and through plasma field <b>45</b> surrounding or close to fiber <b>46</b>.
0023Having described preferred embodiments of the invention with reference to accompanying tables, graphs, and drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various changes and modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
4 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US7106939B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6795636B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO03025631A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US6795636B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| NL1013332C2 | Cited by | Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | Search report |
| US6696157B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO03025631A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| CN102627413A | Cited by | China | Search report |
| WO0166484A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| US7496255B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| CN100387752C | Cited by | China | Search report |
| US7466892B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| EP0605814A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| GB2105371A | Cites | United Kingdom | Search report |
6 members in 3 offices
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41491395 | United States of America | A | |
| 414913 | United States of America | – | |
| US19950414913 | – | – | – |
| 414913 | – | – | – |
Members6
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP0743375A2This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP0743375A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| US5965216A | United States of America | A | |
| EP0743375B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE69609244D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE69609244T2 | Germany | T2 |
26 legal events, as 3 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| European patent in force as of 2002-01-01IF02 | IF02 | GB | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRAGRAH | GRAH | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grantORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRAGRAG | GRAG | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRAGRAH | GRAH | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grantORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRAGRAG | GRAG | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0743375
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0743375
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0743375
- Application
- 96200798
- Application, DOCDB
- 96200798
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19960200798
Titles3
- German
- Verfahren zur Herstellung diamantartiger Beschichtungen
- English
- Method of producing diamond-like-carbon coatings
- French
- Procédé de fabrication de revêtements de carbone semblable à du diamant
Classification
- CPC, 4
- C03C25/223
- C03C25/1062
- C23C16/26
- Y10S427/106
- IPC, 3
- C03C25 10
- C03C25 22
- C23C16 26
Designated states3
- Contracting states, 3
- Germany
- France
- United Kingdom