Compositions for improving the immune response
Abstract
The invention provides diet supplements containing (a) omega-3 PLIFAs and (h) L-aginine and/or L-anithine or their precursors for pre-operative treatment of patients due for surgery.

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 27 February 2015, 11.6 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
9 claims: 5 independent, 4 dependent
- 1The use of (a) omega-3 PUFAs (Component a) and (b) L-arginine, L-omithine an L-arginine or L-omithine precursor, or a mixture thereof (Component b), in the manufacture of an immunostimulatory pre-operative diet for post-operative stimulation of the immune system of patients subject to surgery.
- 8A dietary supplement comprising in one daily unit (a) from 2 to 5 g omega-3 PUFAs in the form of fish oil (b) from 7.5 to 20 g of L-arginine and/or L-omithine in amino acid form or small peptide form.
Independent claims5
55 paragraphs, as filed
It is known that it is possible to enhance the recovery of a deficient or suppressed immune function by diet. Typical examples of immunostimulatory diets are complete diets (i.e. diets supplying essentially all required energy, amino acids, vitamins, minerals and trace elements) comprising arginine, RNA, omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs).
Major surgeries affect the immune response system and increase the risk of post-operative infection of patients having undergone surgery.
It would now be advantageous if it were possible to prepare, by diet, the immune system of a patient due for surgery such that his/her immune response and/or the resistance to infection is improved upon surgery.
It has now been found that it is possible to improve the immune response and/or the resistance to infection upon surgery by administring to patients prior to surgery a dietary supplement comprising an immunostimulatory effective aggregate amount of (a) omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and (b) L-arginine, L-omithine, an L-arginine or L-omithine precursor, or a mixture thereof.
The improved immune response and increased resistance to infection upon surgery after pre-operative treatment with components (a) and (b) may be illustrated by tests.
Examples of tests suitable to indicate that the desired effect has been obtained include i.a. the determination of the docosahexaenoic (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid ( EPA) content of blood serum and of tissues such as liver tissue, the intestinal mucosa and tumor tissue at the operative day, determination of parameters characteristic for the activity of neutrophils, determination of parameters indicating activation of the immune system cells and the like.
The results are compared with results obtained after treatment of patients with a standard supplement. A favourable effect is indicated if for example the serum lipid DHA and/or EPA content is increased. An increase of LTB 5 and a decrease of LTB 4 and LTC 4 upon surgery indicates that the activity of the neutrophils is improved. Activation of the immune system cells upon surgery is i.a. illustrated by a reduced decrease in IL-1a (an activator of immune cells), a reduced decrease in activated T-cells (as established by CD 3 and HLA-DR- determination), a reduced decrease in differentiated suppressorT-cells (as established by CD 8 determination) and a reduced decrease in NK-cells. Experiments suggest that the desired effect can be attained after pre- operative treatment of patients with components (a) and (b).
The invention therefore provides a dietary supplement comprising an immunostimulatory effective aggregate amount of component (a) and component (b).
The present invention further provides a method of improving the immune response and/or resistance to infection of a patient following surgery comprising treating said patient pre-operatively with a diet supplement containing an immunostimulating effective aggregate amount of component (a) and component (b).
The invention also provides the use of component (a) and of component (b) in the manufacture of an immunostimulatory pre-operative diet for post-operative stimulation of the immune system of patients subject to surgery.
For the purpose of the invention omega-3 PUFAs may be in free acid form or in a form suitable for the physiological supply of omega-3 PUFAs, e.g. in triglyceride form. Examples of omega-3 PUFAs particularly appropriate for use in the compositions of the invention include (EPA) and (DHA). Suitable sources for such omega-3 PUFAs are known. They include linseed oil and fish oils such as menhaden oil, salmon oil, mackeral oil, tuna oil, cold liver oil and anchovy oil, in particular menhaden oil.
Typical L-arginine and L-omithine precursors, suitable for the purpose of the invention include small peptides rich in L-arginine and L-omithine resp. The L-arginine and L-omithine may be in free form or in salt form, e.g. a salt with phosphoric acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, fumaric acid, adipic acid or lactic acid.
The supplement is administered in an immune stimulatory aggregate amount during a period of time sufficient to trigger the enhanced immune response.
The daily amount of component (a) i.e. omega-3 PUFAs and of component (b) to be supplied to attain the desired effect will depend on the duration (days) of treatment, and of course on other factors such as the particular patient to be treated.
The supplement should advantageously be administered, e.g. 3 to 4 times per day, all over a period of 3 days or longer, e.g. from 3 to 6 days.
For adults, the total amount of omega-3 PUFAs supplied over that period of treatment should preferably not be below 15 g; the total amount of L-arginine and/or L-omithine supplied by component (b) to adults over that period of treatment should conveniently not be below 60 g.
Administration of a daily amount of component (a) in the range of from 2 to 5 g in association with component (b) supplying from 7.5 to 20 g L-arginine and/or L-omithine will in general suffice to attain the desired effect.
Higher amounts may, of course, be administered.
For use according to the method of the invention, the supplement may, and will preferably comprise further ingredients.
Examples of ingredients having a favourable effect on the immune response and/or the resistance to infection upon surgery, are, independently from each other omega-6 PUFAs (component c) and the pyrimidine and purine bases of nucleotides, hereinafter designated nucleobases (component d).
For the purpose of the invention the omega-6 PUFAs may be in free acid form or in a form suitable for the physiological supply of omega-6 PUFAs, e.g. in triglyceride form. Examples of omega-6 PUFAs particularly appropriate for use according to the invention, include linoleic acid and arachidonic acid (ETA), linoleic acid being most preferred. Examples of suitable omega-6 PUFA sources are known in the art. They include vegetable oils. Preferred are omega-6 PUFA sources having a high linoleic acid content such as safflower oil, sunflower oil, soya oil, cotton oil and corn oil.
For adults, the total amount of omega-6 PUFAs supplied over the period of treatment should preferably not be below 10 g.
Administration of a daily amount of component (c) in the range of from 1.5 to 5.0 g will in general suffice to attain a favourable effect.
In general it will be advantageous to use an amount of component (a) in excess of the amount of component (c) employed.
Components (a) and (c) may also be employed in admixture with other fatty acids, including omega-9 PUFAs. A preferred natural source for such fatty acid mixtures are fish oils. For taste and other reasons, the fish oils will, in oral application forms, preferably be used in encapsulated form.
Nucleobase sources suitable for use in the composition of the invention comprise or consist of natural nucleobases, nucleosides, nucleotides, RNA, DNA, equivalents thereof and/or mixtures comprising one or more of these compounds.
Natural nucleobases include the purines adenine and guanine as well as the pyrimidines cytosine, thymine and uracil. Where the nucleobase source is in the form of free nucleobases, it is preferably uracil.
Natural nucleosides include the ribose nucleosides adenosine, guanosine, uridine and cytidine and the deoxyribose nucleosides deoxyadenosine, deoxyguanosine, deoxythymidine and deoxycytidine.
Natural nucleotides include phosphate esters of natural nucleosides, such as the monophosphates adenylate (AMP), guanylate (GMP), uridylate (UMP), cytidylate (CMP) deoxythymidylate (dTMP) deoxycytidylate (dCMP), and diphosphates and triphosphates of natural nucleosides such as ADP and ATP.
A purified nucleobase source, such as yeast, is preferred. However, other sources such as meat and the like may be used.
For adults, the total amount of RNA supplied over the period of treatment should preferably not be below 5 g.
Administration of a daily amount of RNA in the range of from 0.7 g to 2 g will in general suffice to attain a favourable effect. Equivalent amounts of other nucleobase sources may be used. For the purpose of this invention one weight unit of nucleobase is regarded to be equivalent with 2.5 to 3.0 weight units of RNA, DNA, nucleosides or nucleotides.
The compositions of the invention may be formulated in a form suitable for parenteral or enteral administration. They are particularly appropriate for enteral use, e.g. for oral administration, nasal administration and/or tube feeding. Such compositions are conveniently administered in the form of an aqueous liquid. The compositions of the invention suitable for enteral application are accordingly preferably in aqueous form or in powder form, whereby the powder is conveniently added to water prior to use. For use as tube feeding, the amount of water to be added will i.a. depend on the patient's fluid requirements and condition.
The composition of the invention may comprise vitamins, mineral, trace elements as well as additional nitrogen, carbohydrate and fatty acid sources.
It comprises conveniently also nutritionally acceptable fibre, preferably soluble fibre. The term soluble fibre as used herein refers to fibers which are able to substantially undergo fermentation in the colon to produce short chain fatty acids. Examples of suitable soluble fibers include pectin, guargum, locust bean gum, xanthan gum. They may be hydrolysed or not. For adults the total amount of soluble fibre per day will conveniently lie in the range of from 3 to 30 g/day. The composition of the invention is primarily intended for use as a supplement. The amount of energy supplied by it should in such case not be too excessive, in order not to unnecessarily suppress the patients appetite. The supplement should conveniently comprise energy sources in an amount supplying from 600 to 1500 Kcal/day. The contribution of the nitrogen source, carbohydrate source and lipid source to the total daily caloric may vary within wide ranges. In preferred compositions of the invention the carbohydrate source provides for 40 to 70 % of the total energy supply and, the nitrogen and fatty acid source each for 15 to 30 % of the total energy supply of the composition.
Examples of suitable nitrogen sources include nutritionally acceptable proteins such as caseinates, or protein hydrolysates.
Examples of suitable carbohydrate sources include maltodextrins. Examples of suitable fatty acid energy supply sources include triglyceride sources.
Examples of vitamins suitable for incorporation in the composition of the invention include vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin K, vitamin C, folic acid, thiamin, riboflavin, vitamin B<sub>6</sub>, vitamin B<sub>12</sub>, niacin, biotin and panthotenic acid in pharmaceutically acceptable form.
Examples of mineral elements and trace elements suitable for incorporation in the composition of the invention include sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, manganese, copper, zinc, iron, selenium, chromium and molybdenum in pharmaceutically acceptable form.
In particular, the compositions of the invention will preferably comprise beta-carotene (vitamin A), vitamin E, vitamin C, thiamine, vitamin B<sub>12</sub>, choline selenium and zinc in pharmaceutically acceptable form.
The diet of the invention is indicated for improving the immune response system of patients and acts as a pre-operative diet.
It is also indicated for use prior to operative procedures, to improve the resistance to infection of patients due to undergo surgery.
It is particularly indicated for use following major operative procedures, i.e. including any operative procedure requiring general anesthesia such as cardiac by pass surgery and major upper gastrointestinal surgery.
The composition of the invention may be obtained in a manner known per se, e.g. by admixing the ingredients.
The following examples illustrate the invention: <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li>Example 1 - Powder form - (1 sachet - 74 g) Energy/sachet: 302.8 Kcal.<img file="EP0674902A1_D0001.tif" /><img file="EP0674902A1_D0002.tif" /></li></ul>
Example 2 Influence of a pre-operative oral nutritional support on serum and cellular fatty acid composition and on neutrophil functions from patients with major surgery
The serum and fatty acid composition and the neutrophil functions from fourty patients (average score and age) admitted for major surgery, are analyzed in a randomized placebo controlled double blind study, 5 days before and at the day of the surgery as well as 1 and 7 days after the operation. The patients were divided into two groups. One group received orally an aqueous solution of the composition of Example 1 (in an average amount of 1000 Kcals per day; given in 3 to 4 servings (drinks) of 300 Kcals each during the last 5 days preceding the operation); the other group an isocaloric control nutrition (placebo) having essentially the same composition as that of Example 1 except that 1 sachet placebo of 74 g comprises <ul id="ul0002" list-style="none"><li>• nitrogen source g 13.00 (all as caseinate no L-Arginine)</li><li>· fatty acid sources g 8.33 <ul id="ul0003" list-style="none"><li>- essential fatty acids g (3.04)</li><li>- omega-6 PUFAs g (3.00)</li><li>- omega-3 PUFAs g (-)</li></ul></li><li>• Carbohydrates g (43.94)</li></ul>
(hereinafter referred to as Standard Composition) <ul id="ul0004" list-style="none"><li>(a) Biopsies from the liver, small bowel mucosa and the gastrointestinal tumor were taken from all patients intraoperatively. These tissues and serum lipids were assayed for their fatty acid composition by gas chromatography.</li></ul>
In the group with the supplement of the invention, all examined tissues showed a significantly higher content of EPA, that was accompanied by an increase in the serum lipid EPA concentration. <tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><img file="EP0674902A1_D0003.tif" /></tables>
The data show a significant modulation of the eicosanoid release after preoperative oral treatment with the supplement of the invention. The results demonstrate that preoperative modulation of membrane fatty acid profiles by dietary manipulation offers the possibility to shift the postoperative release of eico- sanoids towards components with lower inflammatory potential.
(b) Neutrophils were isolated from the peripheral blood and stimulated with the Ca-ionophor A23187 (7.3 uM). The capacity of the respective neutrophils to generate leukotrienes was analyzed by RP-HPLC. Neutrophils from the group treated with the composition of the invention generated significantly higher amounts of LTB5 (mean values 6.6 ng/I x 10<sup>7</sup> cells) compared to placebo (2.9 ng/ I at the day of the surgery (day 0; p < 0.05). In contrast, the capacity of neutrophils to produce LTB4 was not significantly different in both patients groups at the day of the surgery and 7 days after surgery.
The LTB5 release by Ca-ionophor stimulated leukocyte cultures was determined 5 days preoperatively, on the day of operation and on the first and seventh postoperative day.
The elevated LTB5 level remained significantly enhanced for seven days after the supplementation was stopped. In the placebo group the LTR5-release remained unchanged.
In the following Table Day O means the day of the operation, Day -5 weeks 5 days before, Day 1 means 1 day after the operation etc. <tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><img file="EP0674902A1_D0004.tif" /></tables>
(C) Determination of NK-cells, Suppressor cells (CD8), activated T cells (CD3, and IL-1 a cells confirm that post-operative immundepression is significantly less expressed following treatment with Composition I compared to Composition S (Standard)-Tables III and IV. <tables id="tabl0003" num="0003"><img file="EP0674902A1_D0005.tif" /></tables><tables id="tabl0004" num="0004"><img file="EP0674902A1_D0006.tif" /></tables>
6 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5 Sheet 6
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Category | Cited during | Relevant claims |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8715742B2 | Cited by | United States of America | – | Applicant | – |
| EP1665940A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| EP0960572A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| WO9958000A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | – | International search | – |
| EP2342979A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| WO2007073176A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | – | International search | – |
| US8546325B2 | Cited by | United States of America | – | Applicant | – |
| EP2277394A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| EP1665940A4 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| EP2277394A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| WO2007073176A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | – | International search | – |
| EP2342979A3 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | – | Search report | – |
| EP0367724A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | X | Search report | 1-9 |
| EP0567433A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | X | Search report | 1-9 |
| US4752618A | Cites | United States of America | X | Search report | 1-4 |
16 members in 11 offices
Priority claims8
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9403935 | United Kingdom | A | |
| 9403935 | United Kingdom | A | |
| 9403935 | United Kingdom | – | |
| 39487295 | United States of America | A | |
| 39487295 | United States of America | A | |
| 9403935 | – | – | – |
| GB19940003935 | – | – | – |
| US19950394872 | – | – | – |
Members16
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB9403935D0 | United Kingdom | D0 | |
| CA2143486A1 | Canada | A1 | |
| AU1347995A | Australia | A | |
| EP0674902A1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| JPH07258075A | Japan | A | |
| US5731290A | United States of America | A | |
| AU698846B2 | Australia | B2 | |
| EP0674902B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT359067T | Austria | T | |
| ATE359067T1 | Austria | T1 | |
| DE69535453D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| PT674902E | Portugal | E | |
| DK0674902T3 | Denmark | T3 | |
| ES2285700T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| DE69535453T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| CA2143486C | Canada | C |
102 legal events, as 12 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ep patent has been removed from the registerECNC | ECNC | SE | |
| Ep patent has been removed from the registerECNC | ECNC | SE | |
| Revocation of the patentMA03 | MA03 | AT | |
| Publication of grant of european patent cancelledR107 | R107 | DE | |
| ExpiryMK07 | MK07 | AT | |
| Patent revokedRevoked27W | 27W | EP | |
| Patent expired after termination of 20 yearsExpiredPE20 | PE20 | GB | |
| Patent declared invalid from date of grant onwardsPLX | PLX | CH | |
| Discontinued because of reaching the maximum lifetime of a patentV4 | V4 | NL | |
| Annulment/lapse due to non-payment of fees, searched and examined patentLapsedMAXIMUM VALIDITY LIMIT REACHEDMM4A | MM4A | PT | |
| Patent revokedRevokedORIGINAL CODE: 0009271RDAG | RDAG | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: PATENT REVOKEDSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Ep patent expiredExpiredEUP | EUP | DK | |
| Expiry of rightR071 | R071 | DE | |
| Appeal procedure closedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9OAPBU | APBU | EP | |
| Epo's revocation decision now finalR064 | R064 | DE | |
| Patent revoked by epoRevokedR103 | R103 | DE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Appeal reference modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNOAPAH | APAH | EP | |
| Opposition filed (corrected)OppositionR26 | R26 | EP | |
| Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modifiedOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPOPLAB | PLAB | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Ep patent has lapsedLapsedEUG | EUG | SE | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Date of receipt of statement of grounds of an appeal modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCNOA3OAPAL | APAL | EP | |
| Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recordedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3OAPBQ | APBQ | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Appeal reference modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNOAPAH | APAH | EP | |
| Appeal reference recordedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNOAPBM | APBM | EP | |
| Date of receipt of notice of appeal recordedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2OAPBP | APBP | EP | |
| Communication despatched that patent is revokedRevokedORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1RDAF | RDAF | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Restoration of ceased patents (sect. 28/pat. act 1977)CeasedRESTORATION ALLOWEDS28 | S28 | GB | |
| Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo]PGRI | PGRI | EP | |
| Announcement of lapse in spainLapsedFD2A | FD2A | ES | |
| Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)REGISTERED BETWEEN 20090226 AND 20090304732E | 732E | GB | |
| Restitutio in integrumRESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUMNF4A | NF4A | PT | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Restoration of ceased patents (sect. 28/pat. act 1977)CeasedAPPLICATION FILEDS28 | S28 | GB | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo]PGRI | PGRI | EP | |
| Modification of the scope of the patentDAS PATENT IST AUFGRUND DES WEITERBEHANDLUNGSANTRAGS VOM 01.12.2008 REAKTIVIERT WORDEN.AEN | AEN | CH | |
| Annulment/lapse due to non-payment of fees, searched and examined patentLapsedLAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEESMM4A | MM4A | PT | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Be: lapsedLapsedBERE | BERE | EP | |
| Nl: modifications (of names), taken from the european patent patent bulletinNLT2 | NLT2 | EP | |
| Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition receivedOppositionORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3PLBB | PLBB | EP | |
| Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)RAP2 | RAP2 | EP | |
| Nl: opposition has been filed with the epoOppositionNLR1 | NLR1 | EP | |
| Opposition filedOpposition26 | 26 | EP | |
| Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sentOppositionORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2PLAX | PLAX | EP | |
| Opposition filedOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009260PLBI | PLBI | EP | |
| Definitive protectionFG2A | FG2A | ES | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Ep patent validated in greeceEP | EP | GR | |
| Ep patent with danish claimsT3 | T3 | DK | |
| Translation of granted ep patentGrantedTRGR | TRGR | SE | |
| Translation is availableAVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATIONSC4A | SC4A | PT | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| European patents granted designating irelandGrantedFG4D | FG4D | IE | |
| European patent takes effect as a national patent in ch/liEP | EP | CH | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| European patent grantedGrantedFG4D | FG4D | GB | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Grant fee paidORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3GRAS | GRAS | EP | |
| Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patentORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1GRAP | GRAP | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Information provided on ipc code assigned before grantRIC1 | RIC1 | EP | |
| Title (correction)COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVING THE IMMUNE RESPONSERTI1 | RTI1 | EP | |
| Appeal reference modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNEAPAF | APAF | EP | |
| Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)RAP1 | RAP1 | EP | |
| Appeal procedure closedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9EAPBT | APBT | EP | |
| Receipt of observations in appeal recordedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBA4EAPBZ | APBZ | EP | |
| Invitation to file observations in appeal sentAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBA2EAPBX | APBX | EP | |
| Invitation to file observations in appeal sentAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBA2EAPBX | APBX | EP | |
| Appeal reference recordedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNEAPAD | APAD | EP | |
| Appeal dossier modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPEAPAB | APAB | EP | |
| Appeal dossier modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPEAPAB | APAB | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)RAP1 | RAP1 | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0674902
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0674902
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0674902
- Application
- 95810125
- Application, DOCDB
- 95810125
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19950810125
Titles3
- German
- Verfahren zur Verbesserung der Immunantwort
- English
- Method of improving the immune response
- French
- Procédé pour améliorer la réponse immunitaire
Classification
- CPC, 8
- A23L33/175
- A23L33/12
- A61P3/06
- A61P37/00
- A61P37/02
- A61P37/04
- A61P37/06
- A61P43/00
- IPC, 14
- A61K31 195
- A23L1 30
- A23L1 305
- A61K31 19
- A61K31 198
- A61K31 20
- A61K31 23
- A61K31 70
- A61P3 06
- A61P37 00
- A61P37 02
- A61P37 04
- A61P37 06
- A61P43 00
Designated states1
- Contracting states, 1
- Sweden