Time-allocation of radio carriers.
Abstract
In a TDMA cellular system, there is provided a mechanism for splitting the allocation of time slots within a TDM frame between adjacent coverage areas. There is provided a method of and apparatus for time-allocation of TDMA channels. It is characterized by: periodically allocating some portion of a carrier (19A-24A) of radio traffic to one coverage area during one time interval and periodically allocating some other portion of that same carrier (19B-24B) to another coverage area during a substantially non-overlapping time interval, all in time synchronism with any proximal reuse of that carrier. The distribution of channels in adjacent coverage areas thereby approaches parity (8+8+5 ≈ 8+8+3+3) and the minimum channel capacity per coverage area is enhanced (8+8 ⇒ 8+8+3+3; 16 ⇒ 22).

Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 25 February 2011, 15.6 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
12 claims: 3 independent, 9 dependent
- 1A method of time-allocation of cellular radio carriers characterized by:allocating some portion of a carrier (19A-24A) of radio traffic to one coverage area during one time interval and allocating some other portion of that same carrier ( 19B-24B) to another coverage area during a substantially non-overlapping time interval, all in time synchronism with any proximal reuse of that carrier.
- 11A method of time-allocabon of cellular radio carriers characterized by:periodically allocating some portion of a carrier (19A-24A) of radio traffic to one coverage area during one time interval and periodically allocating some other portion ( 19B-24B) of that same carrier to another coverage area during a substantially non-overlapping time interval, all in time synchronism with any proximal reuse of that carrier, whereby the distribution of carriers in adjacent coverage areas approaches parity (8+8+5 ≈ 8+8+3+3) and the minimum channel capacity per coverage area is enhanced.
- 12An apparatus for time-allocation of TDMA channels characterized by:means for periodically allocating some portion of a carrier (19A-24A) of radio traffic to one coverage area during one time interval operatively coupled with means for periodically allocating some other portion of that same carrier (19B-24B) to another coverage area dig a substantially non-overlapping time interval, all in time synchronism with any maximal reuse of that carrier, whereby the distribution of carriers in adjacent coverage areas approaches parity (8+8+5 ≈ 8+8+3+3) and the minimum channel capacity per coverage area is enhanced (8+8 ⇒ 8+8+3+3;16 ⇒ 22).
Independent claims3
29 paragraphs, as filed
<u style="single">THE FIELD OF INVENTION</u>
This invention is concerned with time-allocation of cellular radio carriers.
More particularly, in a TDMA cellular system, this invention is concerned with splitting the allocation of time slots within a TDM frame between adjacent coverage areas.
<u style="single">BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION</u>
Currently proposed FDMA/TDMA cellular radiotelephone systems are spectrally inefficient due to an undesirable granularity in their channel allocation.
Traditionally, in cellular systems, as capacity is needed at any cell site, additional frequencies are more or less permanently and fixedly allocated to that cell. In Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) systems, like the next generation digital cellular system in Europe commonly known as GSM Pan-European Digital Cellular, each carrier has multiple (eight) time slots in each frequentially repeating time frame. Each slot represents a single channel of radio traffic capacity. Thus, channel capacity would ordinarily and naturally be added on a modulo-eight basis with the addition of each carrier, in others words -- a granularity of eight.
This granularity-by-eight is spectrally inefficient because overall nominal system capacity and planning is based upon providing the minimum number of traffic channels to serve the expected, offered load in a given area. Yet adjacent coverage areas might well exceed this nominal capacity by one or two orders of magnitude (modulo-eight) dur to this granularity. This is a particular problem in FDMA/TDMA systems because a fixed number of time slots per repeating frame are allocated every time a new carrier is allocated to a coverage area.
Others attempted to solve somewhat analogous capacity problems in FDMA systems by load shedding, or sharing carriers between adjacent sectors of a cell, but such frequency sharing disturbs the regular cellular frequency reuse pattern and causes co-channel interference. Cellular systems require a certain geographic separation of reused frequencies to avoid undo unterference. In other words, the level of co-channel interference (carrier-to-interference ratio) experienced by a cellular subscriber from a proximal reuse of that same carrier frequency establishes the distance at which co-channel, omni-directional antenna sites are allowed to exist, while the predictability of the directivity of sectored antennas serves to reduce the reuse distance (see US Patent No. 4,128,740 to Graziano and assigned to the instant assignee). Sharing a carrier frequency from its intended orientation to an adhacent sector of unintended orientation adversely affects the interference in that direction.
This invention takes as its object to overcome these shortcomings and to realize certain advantage presented below.
According to this invention, to even the granularity-induced discontinuities between adjacent coverage areas and to provide additional capacity as needed, certain time slots from one frame are allocated to one coverage area while other time slots in the frame are allocated to another coverage area.
<u style="single">SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION</u>
In a TDMA cellular system, there is provided a mechanism for splitting the allocation of time slots within a TDM frame between adjacent coverage areas. There is provided a method of and apparatus for time-allocation of TDMA channels. Its comprises: periodically allocating some portion of a carrier of radio traffic to one coverage area during one time interval and periodically allocating some other portion of that same carrier to another coverage area during a substantially non-overlapping time interval, all in time synchronism with any proximal reuse of that carrier. The distribution of channels in adjacent coverage areas thereby approaches parity and the minimum channel capacity per coverage area is enhanced.
<u style="single">DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS</u>
Additional objects, features and advantages of the invention will be more clearly understood and the best mode contemplated for practicing it in its preferred embodiment will be appreciated (by way of unrestricted example) from the following detailed description, taken together with the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a cellular frequency planning diagram of the network in which the preferred embodiment of the invention operates.
Figure 2 illustrate cellular frequency planning according to the preferred embodiment of the invention.
Figure 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus for predeterminally subdividing a TDM frame according to the instant invention.
<u style="single">DETAILED DESCRIPTION</u>
Figure 1 is a cellular frequency planning diagram of the network in which the preferred embodiment of the invention operates.
Figure 1 illustrates what would occur in a three cell site, nine-sector cellular repeat pattern if a set of twenty-four carrier frequencies were conventionally distributed such that every sector had roughly the same frequency capacity. The uneven division of 24 carriers by 9 leaves six sectors with three carriers each and three sectors with two carriers each. This doesn't seem quite so lopsided (because disparities of one were not conventionally thought to be divisible) until one realizes that in a TDM environment, each carrier frequency contains eight traffic channels. Thus, the real capacity disparity is not 3:3:2 or one channel, but eight times that, or 24:24:16 -- a channel capacity disparity of eight. Frequency disparities of one were not thought to be divisible (other than by "sector sharing" with its attendant interference penalty), but time slot disparities of eight are readily divisible and capable of being reallocated to provide additional capacity and raise the local minimum channel capacity from 16 (basing system capacity on 24 channels per coverage area would have caused one-third of the system to have been constantly overloaded).
Figure 2 illustrates cellular frequency planning according to the preferred embodiment of the invention.
Figure 2 illustrates the same (24 carriers x 8 time slots =) 192 channels redistributed according to the invention, raising the local minimum channel capacity to 21 and providing parity among adjacent sectors, resulting in greater spectral efficiency.
Certain channel sets (19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24) have had their eight-slot frames split in two subframes of an A portion of five slots and a B portion of three slots. They are allocated between the sectors in time-synchronism with the repeat pattern, thereby avoiding the co-channel interference commonly experienced with sector sharing. Thus, six sectors have two carriers at eight channels each and one carrier at five A channels, or a channel capacity of 21, while three sectors have two carriers at eight channels each and two carriers at three B channels each, or a channel capacity of 22. Accordingly, substantial traffic channel parity has been achieved at 21:21:22, or a nominal stated system capacity increase from 16 to 21 channels. This foregoing allocation assumes time synchronism between all sectors. If all sectors are not time synchronized, each frame cannot be so neatly allocated between sectors. In that case, one A slot and one B slot must go unused to guard against co-channel interference due to loose synchronism or asynchronism between cells (or be reclaimed on lesser-grade-of-service calls). Notwithstanding the channel loss in these loosely synchronized systems, parity would still be achieved at 8+8+4 : 8+8+4 : 8+8+2+2 or 20:20:20, with a net increase of 4 over the previous local minimum channel capacity of 16.
Advantageously, the B intervals (say 19B and 20B) could themselves be arranged in time to be non-overlapping in a single frame such that both could be provided via a single, frequency-agile transceiver.
Figure 3 illustrates an apparatus for predeterminally subdividing a TDM frame. It illustrates a three bit (modulo-eight) time slot counter 301 to count the number of time slots per frame, following initial synchronization. A latch 303 holds the predetermined number of time slots allocated; five for an A set and three for a B set, for example. The comparator 305 (or its complimentary output) sets the flip-flop 307 to cause a control signal to be generated, enabling a transceiver 309 in that sector. The modulo-eight counter 301 resets the flip-flop 307 with each new frame.
Thus, in a TDMA cellular system, there has been provided a mechanism for splitting the allocation of time slots within a TDM frame between adjacent coverage areas. There has been provided a method of and apparatus for time-allocation of TDMA channels. It comprises: periodically allocating some portion of a carrier of radio traffic to one coverage area during one time interval and periodically allocating some other portion of that same carrier to another coverage area during a substantially non-overlapping time interval, all in time interval, all in time synchronism with any proximal reuse of that carrier. The distribution of channels in adjacent coverage areas thereby approaches parity and the minimum channel capacity per coverage area is enhanced.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been described and shown, it will be appreciated by those skilled in this field that other variations and modifications of this invention may be implemented. For example, although the foregoing discussion has been in terms of balancing or evening the net nominal system capacity, the claimed concept of time-allocation of carriers is equally applicable to providing time-of-day or other capacity increase on a dynamic basis. Similarly, althrough the discussion has revolved around TDMA channels because of their inherent divisibility, the invention finds utility in cellular systems having other forms of channelization, like conventional sectored-antenna and omni-directional antenna Frequency-Division Multiple Access (FDMA) cellular systems or any omni-directional antenna system where allocation of carriers in time could be implemented (provided time synchronism is established to coordinate co-channel proximal reuses of that carrier in time).
Although the foregoing discussion has been in terms of a fixed and predetermined allocation of channel capacity, dynamic allocation of channel capacity in accordance with the invention is equally feasible for time-of-day capacity needs and the like. Similarly, although the discussion has been in terms of modulo-eight TDM, modulo-three and modulo-six digital cellular systems are in development; this technique is clearly equally applicable to modulo-n systems, whether frequency-hopped or not.
These and all other variations and adaptations are expected to fall within the ambit of the appended claims.
2 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO0074426A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP0637180A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| CN100409713C | Cited by | China | Search report |
| US6600758B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP1313337A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| US10264562B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6859655B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| WO02058270A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| EP0963129A2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| US6229796B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6400955B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US6549531B1 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US5844894A | Cited by | United States of America | Search report |
| EP0963129A3 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| EP0959636A1 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| WO9960808A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO9732441A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO03043365A1 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO02058270A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO02058270A3 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO9732441A2 | Cited by | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | International search |
| WO9101073A1 | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | Search report |
7 members in 4 offices
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 485420 | United States of America | – | |
| 48542090 | United States of America | A | |
| 485420 | – | – | – |
| US19900485420 | – | – | – |
Members7
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP0444841A2This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| EP0444841A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| US5185739A | United States of America | A | |
| EP0444841B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| AT129110T | Austria | T | |
| DE69113651D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE69113651T2 | Germany | T2 |
43 legal events, as 4 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registeredP01 | P01 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Notification of lapseLapsedST | ST | FR | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal feeCeasedGBPC | GBPC | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Se: european patent has lapsedLapsedEUG | EUG | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| European patent in force as of 2002-01-01IF02 | IF02 | GB | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0444841
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0444841
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0444841
- Application
- 91301473
- Application, DOCDB
- 91301473
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19910301473
Titles3
- German
- Zeitliche Zuweisung von Trägerfrequenzen
- English
- Time-allocation of radio carriers
- French
- Allocation temporelle de porteuses radio
Classification
- CPC, 2
- H04B7/2643
- H04W16/24
- IPC, 2
- H04B7 26
- H04W16 24
Designated states14
- Contracting states, 14
- Austria
- Belgium
- Switzerland
- Germany
- Denmark
- Spain
- France
- United Kingdom
- Greece
- Italy
- Liechtenstein
- Luxembourg
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Sweden