Elastomeric filtration materials.

Background of the Invention

Field of the Invention

0001The present invention relates to nonwoven fibrous filter media which are particularly useful as prefilters on respirators.

Background Information

0002There is increasing interest by governmental agencies, the general public, and the work force in protecting individuals against the harmful effects of toxic materials such as lead fumes, silica dust, asbestos, and paint spray. A variety of face masks, respirators, and filters have been proposed to filter such toxic materials from the air.

0003U.S. Patent No. 3,971,373 (Braun) discloses a particle-loaded small diameter fiber sheet product and respirators made therefrom. The sheet product comprises a uniform three-dimensional arrangement of discrete solid particles uniformly dispersed in a web of melt-blown small diameter fibers. The particles are physically held in the web, even though there is only point contact between the small diameter fibers and the particles, whereby the full surface of the particles is available for interaction with a medium to which the sheet product is exposed.

0004U.S. Patent No. 4,215,682 (Kubik et al.) discloses a fibrous web electret which comprises melt-blown fibers prepared by extruding molten fiber-forming material through orifices into a high-velocity gaseous stream where the extruded material is drawn out into fiber and solidified in the fibrous form, the fibers having electrically charged particles and a persistent electric charge that is useful to enhance filtering properties of the web, the charge having a half-life of at least one week in a room-temperature, 100-percent-relative-humidity environment.

0005U.S. Patent No. 4,294,599 (Grovesteen et al.) discloses an aerosol filter cartridge employing a prefilter having the form of a closely spiraled Fiberglas mat functioning to distribute captured aerosol particles substantially uniformly therethrough. The Fiberglas mat is placed edgewise against the final filtering components of the cartridge.

0006U.S. Patent No. 4,334,901 (Ayes et al.) discloses a respirator cartridge which is designed to eliminate the traditional screen between the perforated cartridge bottom and its adjacent filter component, substitute Fiberglas for one of the usual two wool-felt components and minimize filter component-to-shell cementing operations along with reshaping of the initial aerosol contacting filter component for effecting greater than usual distribution of aerosol loading and lower inhalation resistance.

0007U.S. Patent No. 4,600,002 (Maryyanek et al.) discloses a multiple ply, fold-flat, disposable respirator having, as one ply, a layer of a toxic gas or vapor absorbing material, and as another ply, an aerosol filter. The respirator has an inturned vertical seam covered with a strip of foamed elastomer.

0008U.S. Patent No. 4,662,005 (Grier-Idris) discloses a pouch-like conformable face mask which includes a generally rectangular body portion formed from a filtration medium and having top and bottom edge portions and a pair of opposed side portions. An elastically extendible material is located at the periphery of the side and bottom edge portions of the generally rectangular body portion,mask to gather into a pouch or cup-like configuration.

0009U.S. Patent No. Re. 32,171 discloses an electret fibrous web which is prepared by continuously feeding a film of highly molecular non-polar material; heating the film; stretching the film along the longitudinal axis thereof as defined by the path of movement of the film; homopolarly electrically charging at least one side of the film; fibrillating the charged film into fiber material; and collecting the fiber material.

0010Ogawa, in an article entitled "Development of Spunbonded Based on Thermoplastic Polyurethane," <u style="single">Nonwovens World</u>, May-June, 1986. pp 79-81, describes a spunbonded nonwoven polyurethane elastic fabric developed by Kanebo Ltd. The fabric is made using a melt blown process which is different from a conventional melt blown process to produce fabric which is similar to that of spunbonded fabrics. The diameter of its filaments is not so fine as that of the usual melt blown fabrics, i.e., 0.5-2 microns, but apparently is closer to that of the spunbonded fabrics, i.e., 20-50 microns. The elasticity, dust catching capability, low linting, high friction coefficient, air permeability and welding characteristics of the urethane fabrics are discussed in the article.

Summary of the Invention

0011The present invention provides elastomeric nonwoven fibrous fluid filter media for removal of particulate contaminants from the fluid comprising thermoplastic elastomeric melt-blown small diameter fibers, the small diameter fibers being randomly arrayed, the filter media having substantially uniform stretch properties in all directions, whose filtration properties are independent of filter media elongations sufficient to increase the filter media surface area at least about 10 percent, preferably at least about 25 percent, more preferably at least about 40 percent. The elastomeric filter media of the present invention have utility as low pressure drop filter and prefilter materials or as tubular fluid filters. The filter media may further comprise a variety of mixtures of fibers and/or particulate material such as, for example, absorbent particulate, staple fibers, or electrically charged fibrils.

0012The present invention further provides a respirator having as a low pressure drop prefilter thereon for removal of particulate fluid contaminants elastomeric nonwoven fibrous fluid filter media comprising thermoplastic elastomeric melt-blown small diameter fibers, the small diameter fibers being randomly arrayed, the filter media having substantially uniform stretch properties in all directions, whose filtration properties are independent of filter media elongations sufficient to increase the filter media surface area at least about 10 percent.

0013Surprisingly, the filtration performance of the filter media of the present invention remains substantially constant when the media is subjected to mechanical stresses which increased their area. This is particularly surprising in that the filter media becomes thinner when stretched and the geometry of the open area of the media is significantly altered as the filter media is stretched. The comparatively constant filtration performance might be expected with minor extensions which produce increases of 3 or 4 percent in the total area of the filter, but such comparatively constant filtration performance is totally unexpected with extensions that produced increases in excess of 40 percent in the area of the filter.

0014Filtration performance which is substantially independent of the degree of elongation of the filter media coupled with a low pressure drop on loading enables the elastomeric filter media of the present invention to function very effectively as prefilter materials. In addition to their highly desirable filtration properties, the inherent elasticity and conformability of the filter media and the ability to seal against a range of complex filter holders without elaborate adapters makes the elastomeric filter media of the present invention a very versatile and economic prefilter material.

0015The filter media of the present invention are elastic, and hence are not subject to catastrophic failure on experiencing comparatively small mechanical stresses, i.e., 5 percent or less increase in area, as are nonwoven filter media prepared from polypropylene and polycarbonate materials. Also, because of their elastic properties and associated toughness as compared to the inelastic polypropylene and polycarbonate media, they require little, if any, additional support or protection, such as, for example, as occur in laminated structures. The elastic properties of the filter media also enable the filter media to seal against a filtration fixture simply by stretching the filter media over a smooth edge of the filtration fixture.

Description of the Drawings

0016<ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li>FIG. 1 is a single-piece prefilter element based on the elastomeric filter media of the present invention.</li><li>FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the prefilter element of FIG. 1 taken along line 1-1 of FIG. 1.</li><li>FIG. 3 is the prefilter illustrated in Figure 1 installed on a respirator.</li><li>FIG. 4 tubular elastic filter mounted on a filter tube.</li></ul>

Detailed Description of the Invention

0017The nonwoven elastomeric filter media of the present invention are based on melt blown webs of thermoplastic elastomeric small diameter fibers. Elastomeric thermoplastic materials from which the small diameter fiber webs can be prepared include, for example, elastomeric polyurethanes, elastomeric polyesters, elastomeric polyamides and elastomeric A-B-A′ block copolymers wherein A and A′ are styrenic moieties and B is an elastomeric midblock.

0018Filtration properties of the elastomeric filter media of the present invention can be tailored over a wide range through selection of the appropriate melt blown fiber size or by uniform incorporation of crimped spacing staple fibers, or electrically charged or chargeable fibers or fibrous clusters into the web matrix. Sorbent particulate material may also be incorporated in the web.

0019Crimped spacing staple fibers are preferably included in the filter media to reduce the pressure drop during use and to decrease caking of the filter media by the material being filtered as well as to provide filtration. Useful crimped spacing fibers include, for example, acrylic, polyester, nylon and polyolefin fibers. Polyester and acrylic fibers are particularly preferred. The crimped spacing fibers are preferably incorporated at loading levels of from about 10 to 60 weight percent, more preferably about 25 to 35 weight percent of the filter media. The crimped spacing fibers preferably are about 1.5 to 15 , more preferably 4 to 6, denier in size and have an average staple length sufficient to include at least one complete crimp, more preferably at least three or four crimps. Generally the crimped spacing fibers should average about 2 to 15 centimeters in length. Preferably the crimped spacing fibers are less than about 5 centimeters in length.

0020The ability of the elastomeric filter media to remove small particulate matter from an air stream can be dramatically improved by incorporating into the filter media charged fibers, i.e., fibrillated polypropylene fibers such as those described in U.S. Patent No. 4,588,537 (Klasse et al.). Such charged fibers also can serve as spacing fibers to reduce pressure drops during particulate filtration. Preferably the amount of charged fibers incorporated in the filter media is in the range of about 10 to 60 weight percent, more preferably in the range of about 25 to 35 weight percent.

0021Elastic properties of the filter media are controlled by the size of the fiber making up the filter media, the amounts of various types of fibers in the filter media and the basis weight of the web. The elastomeric small diameter fibers preferably have diameters of from about 1 micron to greater than 50 microns, more preferably from about 5 microns to about 30 microns. When the diameter of the small diameter fibers is less than 1 micron, the web may lack sufficient tensile strength. When the diameter of the small diameter fibers is greater than about 50 microns, filtration properties may be reduced.

0022The basis weight of the web is also a major factor in controlling the elastic properties of the filter media. Higher basis weight webs are typically used for applications requiring higher tensions or higher filtration properties while lower basis weight webs are utilized for applications requiring low tensions. Web basis weights are preferably in the range of from about 15 to about 300 grams/m², more preferably in the range of from about 100 to about 200 gm/m². As was the case with the fiber diameter, the specific application will determine the optimum web basis weight.

0023The filter media of the invention preferably has a tensile strength of at least about 0.5 g/2.5 cm width/g/m² basis weight, more preferably at least about 2 g/2.5 cm width/g/m² basis weight. When the tensile strength is less than 0.1 g/2.5 cm width/g/m² basis weight, the filter media may tear during attachment to a fixture or respirator.

0024The filter media of the invention preferably has an elongation at break of at least about 50%, more preferably at least about 100%. When the elongation at break is less than 20%, the filter media may rupture during use, e.g., when being stretched over a respirator as a prefilter.

0025The filter media of the present invention can be prepared by a process similar to that taught in Wente, Van A., "Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers" in Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 48, pages 1342 et seg (1956), or in Report No. 4364 of the Naval Research Laboratories, published May 25, 1954 entitled "Manufacture of Superfine Organic Fibers" by Wente, Van A., Boone, C.D. and Fluharty, E.L. except that a circular orifice die is preferably used. The thermoplastic elastomeric materials are extruded through the die into a high velocity stream of heated air which draws out and attenuates the fibers prior to their solidification and collection.

0026Loading of the elastomeric melt blown webs with crimped spacing staple fibers or fibrous clusters can be achieved by gently introducing a secondary air stream containing the staple fibers or fibrous clusters into the primary air stream carrying the extruded fibers in a manner similar to that described in U.S. Patent No. 4,118,531 (Hauser), at a point where the fibers are still in a tacky condition. The secondary air stream, which typically has a velocity of from about 10 to about 50 m/sec, intersects the primary air stream, which typically has a velocity of from about 100 to about 180 m/sec, in a substantially perpendicular manner.

0027The thus-loaded fiber stream can then be collected in a random fashion such as, for example, on a perforated screen cylinder, prior to complete fiber solidification so that the fibers can form a coherent web which does not require additional binders. It is suspected that some adhesive bonding between fibers at points of contact may occur between fibers when they contact each other prior to complete solidification.

0028The filter media of the invention is particularly useful as a prefilter for respirators. FIG. 1 is an illustration of a single piece prefilter element 10 utilizing the elastomeric filter media of the present invention. The element 10, which is slightly undersized for the filter area it is intended to protect as a prefilter, can be shaped to accommodate exhalation valves or other critical elements of a respirator. The element is retained over the filter area of the respirator in a stretched condition by means of the attachment eyelets 12 which fit over mounting posts on the respirator body. The eyelets typically are reinforced by densifying the filter media in the area immediately around the eyelet by means of heat and pressure. A cross-sectional view of the prefilter element is shown in FIG. 2.

0029FIG. 3 illustrates installation of the prefilter element shown in FIG. 1 on a respirator which involves a number of complex design elements. The respirator 20 has a substantially spherical shape which would typically require a complex adapter arrangement to seal a non-elastic prefilter element against the respirator. The prefilter element 10 based on the elastomeric filter media of the present invention is readily sealed against this complex structure by means of a four point attachment to the respirator. The attachment eyelets 12 are simply slipped over the attachment posts 22 which cause the prefilter element to be stretched and tightly conform to the contours of the respirator, thereby effecting a seal between the prefilter element and the respirator. (An effective seal is realized when gaps between the filter media and the filtration fixture are reduced to a dimension less than that occurring in the pores of the filter media.) Once loaded, the prefilter element is removed and replaced with a new element, a procedure which is far less expensive than replacing an entire respirator or respirator cartridge.

0030A further useful application for the filter media of the invention is as a tubular elastic filter for a filter tube as shown in FIG. 4. Tubular elastic filter 40 which has a sealed end 42 and an open end 44 is slightly smaller in diameter than filter tube 46 which has openings or perforations 48. The tubular elastic filter is merely stretched over the filter tube and is form-fitted due to its smaller diameter.

0031This invention is further illustrated by the following examples, but the particular materials and amounts thereof recited in these examples, as well as other conditions and details, should not be construed to unduly limit this invention.

0032In the examples all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified. In the examples tests were conducted by placing the filter media over the test holder, stretched to the indicated degree of extension and secured against the cylinder of the test holder in that configuration with two elastic rubber bands (No. 62, available from Universal Corp., Forest Park, IL. The following test methods were used for evaluation purposes in the examples: Dioctyl Phthalate (DOP) Aerosol Penetration (30 C.F.R. Part 11, Subpart K, NIOSH Regulations): A sample of filter media is mounted on an aluminum cylinder (9.28 cm diameter, 5 cm high) hermetically mounted directly over a 9.28 cm hole in an aluminum sheet. The sample was tested using an Air Techniques, Inc. Model Q127 DOP Penetrometer™ set at a flow rate of 32 liters/minute and generating an aerosol of 0.3 micron DOF particles at a mass concentration of 100 mg/m³. The initial filter weight, area stretch, DOP penetration, pressure drop are reported. Lead Fume Removal (30 C.F.R. Part 11, Subpart M, NIOSH Regulations): A sample of filter media is mounted on an aluminum cylinder (9.28 cm diameter, 5 cm high) hermetically mounted on a 0.64 cm thick fiber glass/resin board which had a 29/42 standard taper epoxy fitting centrally positioned below the cylinder and hermetically sealed to the Fiberglas/resin board. The sample was exposed to a lead fume challenge of between 15-20 mg/m³ (calculated on the basis of metallic lead content) at a flow rate of 16 liters per minute for a period of 90 minutes. The initial filter weight, area stretch, filter weight gain due to lead removal, lead penetration, initial pressure drop, and final pressure drop are reported. Silica Dust Removal (30 C.F.R. Part 11, Subpart K, NIOSH Regulations): A sample of filter media is mounted on an aluminum cylinder (9.28 cm diameter, 5 cm high) hermetically mounted on a 0.64 cm thick fiber glass/resin board which had a 29/42 standard taper epoxy fitting centrally positioned below the cylinder and hermetically sealed to the Fiberglas/resin board. The sample was exposed to a silica dust challenge of between 50-60 mg/m³ at a flow rate of 16 liters/minute for a period of 90 minutes. The initial filter weight, area stretch, filter weight gain due to silica dust removal, silica dust penetration, initial pressure drop, and final pressure drop are reported. Spray Paint Removal (30 C.F.R. Part 11, Subpart L, NIOSH Regulations): Enamel paint: A sample of filter media is mounted on an aluminum cylinder (9.28 cm diameter, 5 cm high) hermetically mounted on a 0.64 cm thick fiber glass/resin board which had a 29/42 standard taper epoxy fitting centrally positioned below the cylinder and hermetically sealed to the Fiberglas/resin board. The sample was exposed to an enamel paint challenge of 190-250 mg/m³ at a flow of 16 liters/minute for 156 minutes. The area stretch, amount filtered, initial pressure drop, and final pressure drop are reported. Lacquer-based paint: A sample of filter media is mounted on an aluminum cylinder (9.28 cm diameter, 5 cm high) hermetically mounted on a 0.64 cm thick fiber glass/resin board which had a 29/42 standard taper epoxy fitting centrally positioned below the cylinder and hermetically sealed to the Fiberglas/resin board. The sample was exposed to a lacquer-based paint challenge of 95-125 mg/m³ at a flow of 16 liters/minute for 156 minutes. The area stretch, amount filtered, initial pressure drop, and final pressure drop are reported.

Examples 1-15

0033Filter media having multi-directional elastic properties were prepared by melt blowing PS-455-200, a polyesterurethane thermoplastic elastomeric resin available from K.J. Quinn Co., Malden, MA, using a process similar to that described in Wente, Van A., "Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers" in Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 48, pages 1342 et seq (1965) or in Report No. 4364 of the Naval Research Laboratories, published May 25, 1964 entitled "Manufacture of Superfine Organic Fibers" by Wente, Van A., Boone, C.D., and Fluharty, E.L. except that the melt-blowing die had smooth surfaced circular orifices (10/cm) with a 5:1 length-to-diameter ratio. The die temperature was maintained at 220°C, the primary air temperature and pressure were, respectively, 230°C and 150 kPa, (0.63 cm gap width), and the polymer throughput rate was about 150 gm/hr/cm.

0034Secondary fibers were loaded into the polyurethane web by dispersing polyester staple fibers (5.5 denier, 3.75 cm in length) in a secondary air stream and impinging that air stream into the primary air stream carrying the polyurethane fiber stream in a process similar to that described in U.S. Patent No. 4,118,531 (Hauser), at a point where the fibers were still in a tacky condition. The secondary air stream intersected the primary air stream in a substantially perpendicular manner. The thus-loaded fiber stream was collected in a random manner on a perforated screen cylinder prior to complete fiber solidification so that the fibers were able to bond to one another and form a coherent web.

0035The basis weight of the polyurethane web was 100 gm/m² and the polyester staple fiber was added to the polyurethane web at a rate of 40 gm/m² to produce a filter media having a basis weight of about 140 gm/m².

0036Circular test samples (14.6 cm in diameter) were die cut from both the polyurethane based filter media and the control polypropylene media and marked with three concentric circles having diameters of 7.72, 8.44 and 9.28 cm respectively using a stencil as a guide. The outer circle coincided with the diameter of the test holder and the middle and inner circles corresponded to indicia for 10 and 20 percent diametrical (21 and 44 percent area) extension, respectively, as the filter media was stretched over the filter holder until the circle coincided with the edge of the holder. In stretching the filter media, the basis weight of the filter media decreased to 82.6 percent of the original value, or 115.6 gm/m² with the 10 percent extension and to 69.5 percent of the original value, or 97.3 gm/m² with the 20 percent extension.

0037The thickness of the filter media was also measured on an unstretched sample and on samples at 10% extension and 20% extension. The samples were mounted as described above except that a solid polished nylon surface was placed beneath the sample and a controlled surface pressure of 0.69 kPa (0.1 psi) was applied to the filter media surface. The thickness was measured using a Mitutoyo No. 192-116 depth gauge and a Starrett No. 711 dial indicator. The initial thickness was 0.23 cm; the thickness at 10% extension (21% area increase) was 0.19 cm; and the thickness at 20% extension (44% area increase) was 0.15 cm.

0038Samples were tested for DOP aerosol penetration (Examples 1-3), lead fume removal Examples 4-6), silica dust removal (Examples 7-9), and spray paint removal (Enamel - Examples 10-12; Lacquer - Examples 13-15). The results are reported in Tables I, II, III, and IV, respectively.

Comparative Example 1

0039A commercially available elastomeric polyurethane web Kanebo™ type ES25, available from Kanebo Company, Japan, having a basis weight of 20 g/m² was tested for spray paint removal. Seven layers of web were used to achieve a basis weight comparable to the the filter media of Example 1. The results are reported in Table IV. <tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><table frame="all"><title>Table I</title><tgroup cols="4" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="39.37mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" /><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Example 1</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Example 2</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Example 3</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Initial filter weight (g):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">2.71</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">2.40</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">2.57</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Area stretch (%):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">21</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">44</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">DOP penetration (%):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">96</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">96</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">95</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Pressure drop (mm H₂O):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.6</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.4</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">0.45</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

0040The DOP test data presented in Table I suggests that, for the filter media constructions evaluated, the filtration performance is independent of elongation. <tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><table frame="all"><title>Table II</title><tgroup cols="4" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="39.37mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" /><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Example 4</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Example 5</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Example 6</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Initial filter weight (g):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">2.7244</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">2.7589</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">2.5484</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Area stretch (%):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">21</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">44</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Filter weight gain¹ (mg):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">11.3</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">12.6</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">11.9</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Lead penetration¹ (mg):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">12.8</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">13.37</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">14.10</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Initial pressure drop² (mm H₂O):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.80</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.76</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">0.62</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Final pressure drop² (mm H₂O):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">1.70</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">1.78</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">1.46</entry></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup cols="4" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="39.37mm" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="justify">¹ Determined at a flow rate of 16 1pm</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="justify">² Determined at a flow rate of 42.5 1pm</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

0041The lead fume removal data presented in Table II shows similar filtration performance for all degrees of elongation of the filter media and also a low pressure drop increase during the test. This data suggests that the filter media constructions tested would have utility as prefilters to remove a portion of lead particulate from air without a significant increase in pressure drop. <tables id="tabl0003" num="0003"><table frame="all"><title>Table III</title><tgroup cols="4" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="39.37mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" /><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Example 7</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Example 8</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Example 9</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Initial filter weight (g):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">2.7144</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">2.6378</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">2.6059</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Area stretch (%):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">21</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">44</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Filter weight gain¹ (mg):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">50.4</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">50.15</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">51.10</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Silica penetration¹ (mg):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">51.82</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">53.68</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">56.12</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Initial pressure drop² (mm H₂O):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">1.55</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">1.45</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">1.20</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Final pressure drop² (mm H₂O):</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">3.15</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">3.10</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">2.85</entry></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup cols="4" colsep="0" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="39.37mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="39.37mm" /><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="justify">¹ Determined at a flow rate of 16 1pm</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col4" align="justify">² Determined at a flow rate of 42.5 1pm</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

0042The silica dust removal data presented in Table III shows similar performance for all degrees of elongation of the filter media and a low pressure drop increase during the test. This data suggests, as did the lead fume removal data, that the filter media constructions tested would have utility as prefilters to remove a portion of a particulate from air without a significant increase in pressure drop. <tables id="tabl0004" num="0004"><table frame="all"><title>Table IV</title><tgroup cols="5" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="31.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left"><u style="single">Enamel test</u></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" /><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" /><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" /><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" /></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><u style="single">Example</u></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Area stretch (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Amount filtered (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Initial pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center"><u style="single">Final pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">10</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">46</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">0.6</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">0.7</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">11</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">21</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">49</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">0.9</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">1.0</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">12</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">44</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">51</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">0.8</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">1.0</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">Comp. 1</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">29</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">0.3</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">0.5</entry></row></tbody></tgroup><tgroup cols="5" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="31.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left"><u style="single">Lacquer Test</u></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" /><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" /><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" /><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" /></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><u style="single">Example</u></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Area stretch (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Amount filtered (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Initial pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center"><u style="single">Final pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">13</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">74</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">0.7</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">38</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">14</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">21</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">79</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">0.7</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">74</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">15</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">44</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">82</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">0.6</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">125</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">Comp. 2</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">48</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="char" char=".">0.3</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="char" char=".">9</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

0043The data in Table IV demonstrates that stretching the filter media of the invention has little effect on filtration efficiency and, in the case of the Enamel Test, very little change in pressure drop occurs with stretching the filter media. The comparative elastic web performs much less efficiently than the filter media of the invention.

Comparative Example 3

0044An other comparative web based on polypropylene was prepared in a process similar to that described in Wente, Van A., "Superfine Thermoplastic Fibers" in Industrial Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 48, pages 1342 et seq (1965) or in Report No. 4364 of the Naval Research Laboratories, published May 25, 1964 entitled "Manufacture of Superfine Organic Fibers" by Wente, Van A., Boone, C.D., and Fluharty, E.L.. The polypropylene web had a basis weight of 55 g/m².

0045All attempts to stretch this web over the test sample holder resulted in a catastrophic failure, i.e., tearing, of the web so no comparative data between filter media of the invention and the control web could be made.

Examples 16-17

0046Filter media was prepared as in Examples 1-15 except the polyester fiber was replaced with 50 g/m² of a fibrillated, charged polypropylene film (Filtrete™, available from Filtrete Company) to produce filter media with a basis weight of 150 g/m². The filter media was subjected to a lacquer paint spray test. The results are set forth in Table V. <tables id="tabl0005" num="0005"><table frame="all"><title>Table V</title><tgroup cols="5" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="31.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><u style="single">Example</u></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Area stretch (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Amount filtered (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Initial pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center"><u style="single">Final pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">16</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">99</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">1</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">17</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">17</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">21</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">98</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">1</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">58</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

0047The data in Table V demonstrates that very efficient lacquer paint spray removal can be achieved with filter media of the invention containing charged fibers and that performance remains substantially constant even when the filter media is stretched.

Examples 18 and 19

0048In Examples 18 and 19, elastomeric filter media was prepared as in Examples 1-15 except, in Example 18, the amount of polyester staple fiber was increased to 45 g/m² to produce a filter media basis weight of 145 g/m² and, in Example 19, the polyester staple fiber was replaced with 50 g/m² of a fibrillated, charged polypropylene film (Filtrete™, available from Filtrete Company) to produce filter media with a basis weight of 150 g/m². Each filter media was tested for lacquer paint spray removal using 30 C.F.R. 11, Subpart L. The test results are set forth in Table VI. <tables id="tabl0006" num="0006"><table frame="all"><title>Table VI</title><tgroup cols="5" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="31.50mm" /><colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="31.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="center"><u style="single">Example</u></entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center"><u style="single">Area stretch (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center"><u style="single">Amount filtered (%)</u></entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="center"><u style="single">Initial pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="center"><u style="single">Final pressure drop (mm H₂O)</u></entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">18</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">64</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">12</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">57</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="right">19</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="right">0</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="right">98</entry><entry namest="col4" nameend="col4" align="right">12</entry><entry namest="col5" nameend="col5" align="right">58</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>

0049The data in Table VI demonstrate that improved performance in lacquer paint spray removal can be achieved by substituting charged polypropylene fibers for uncharged polyester fibers.

0050The various modifications and alterations of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention and this invention should not be restricted to that set forth herein for illustrative purposes.