Use of maltitiol in chewing gum compositions for improved physical stability
19 claims: 3 independent, 16 dependent
- 1Use of maltitol in a substantially anhydrous chewing gum composition in an amount of from 28 to 58% by weight, with respect to the weight of the chewing gum composition, to texturise, sweeten and maintain said composition in a substantially anhydrous form, the composition further comprising from 10 to 75% gum base, by weight of the composition, wherein the total amount of the composition is not exceeding 100%.
- 10A method of texturising, sweetening and maintaining in a substantially anhydrous form, a substantially anhydrous chewing gum composition comprising adding maltitol to the composition in an amount of from 28 to 58% by weight, with respect to the weight of the chewing gum composition, the composition further comprising from 10 to 75% by weight of the composition, of gum base, wherein the total amount of the composition is not exceeding 100%.
Independent claims3
39 paragraphs in 1 section, as filed
Chewing gum compositions are, in general, composed of a water-insoluble or base portion and a water-soluble chewing gum portion which primarily contains the sweetness and flavor components. In order to provide an acceptably sweet gum product it is important to consider both of the major components of the overall gum compositions. Thus, in order to retain acceptable sweetness, flavor, and texture while retaining good shelf-life, it is important to provide an environment in which the different gum components maintain their characteristic qualities and are not degraded by moisture or other gum components. Both moisture loss and gain have been known to have particularly harmful effects on the life of gum products.
In the case of sugarless chewing gums, it has been found advantageous to provide the gum composition with low-moisture content in order to prevent deleterious affects of water on, among other things, high intensity sweeteners such as aspartame, etc.
In the past chewing gum compositions have been provided with low percentages of moisture in the final product generally by driving off the water once the chewing gum formulation has been made. Thus, for example, the prior art compositions ordinarily contain water and/or moisture-containing ingredients, i.e., sorbitol solution, corn syrup solutions, etc., and would therefore require heating or purification of the compositions to drive off water and obtain a certain moisture content. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,035,572 discloses a gum base formulation with less than 0.5% moisture. This level percentage of moisture is due to the purification process which removes water and salivant from the gum base.
U.S. Patent No. 4,382,963 involves a low calorie chewing gum which uses polydextrose as the sole soluble bulking agent. The moisture content in the final product is about 1 to 5% and this is obtained by omitting the aqueous component, e.g., sorbitol syrups or corn syrups which are normally used in chewing gum products.
U.S. Patent No. 3,262,784 discloses a chewing gum composition which has less than 1% moisture in the final product due to heating between about 170° and 250°F to drive off the water.
U.S. Patent No. 4,150,161 relates to a two component confection having a carbonated candy component and a pliable bubble gum component with each component having a controlled water activity between 0.1 to 0.3 and which is capable of surviving long periods of storage when packaged in a moisture resistant material.
It is also known to provide chewing gum compositions which have low moisture content and/or low moisture pickup during storage. For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,683,138 to Glass, et al. discloses a low moisture, sugarless, center-filled chewing gum wherein a low moisture, liquid center-fill is incorporated into a cavity within a substantially anhydrous chewing gum shell. The Glass, et al. '138 disclosure along with all the references cited therein, each one of which is incorporated herein by reference, are directed to reducing the amount of moisture in chewing gum composition whether its sugar-containing or sugarless gum.
In the case of anhydrous gum compositions, however, there still remains a problem in providing sugarless compositions with low moisture pick-up, while at the same time retaining a soft texture over a period of time which provides the consumer with a product having an acceptable chew characteristic.
WO-A-8 808 671 discloses a hard shell coated sugarless gum composition comprising a sweetener, such as sorbitol. Maltitol is mentioned as an example of a sweetening bulking agent which can be used instead of sorbitol.
FR-A-2 499 576 discloses the preparation of anhydrous maltitol crystals.
EP-A-0 302 203 discloses chewing gum compositions comprising a laminate structure whereby an aspartate derived water-sensitive sweetener is maintained at low pH and is separated from a moisture-containing conventional gum composition. Maltitol is mentioned as a possible sweetening agent.
According to the present invention there is provided the use of maltitol in a substantially anhydrous chewing gum composition in an amount of from 28 to 58% by weight, with respect to the weight of the chewing gum composition, to texturise, sweeten and maintain said composition in a substantially anhydrous form, the composition further comprising from 10 to 75% gum base, by weight of the composition.
The present invention also provides a method of texturising, sweetening and maintaining in a substantially anhydrous form, a substantially anhydrous chewing gum composition comprising adding maltitol to the composition in an amount of from 28 to 58% by weight, with respect to the weight of the chewing gum composition, the composition further comprising from 10 to 75% by weight of the composition, of gum base. Furthermore, said composition also provides low-moisture content and low-moisture pickup during storage where by the end product has a good shelf life.
The composition as a whole has no greater than about 3.5% by weight of moisture. Preferably, the sweetening/bulking agent is included from an amount from 45% to 55%.
Other components can be included such as high intensity sweeteners in order to supplement the sweetening/bulking agent. Inasmuch as maltitol as a bulking agent has a high degree of sweetness, high intensity sweeteners can be included in amounts as little as 0.01% and can range up to 3% based on weight. Preferably high intensity sweeteners, when included can be in an amount from 0.025 to only 1.5% by weight. Other components such as flavor components can also be included in an amount from 0.05 to 3.0% based on weight.
Another component which can be included, especially since it enhances the ability of a composition to preserve the efficacy of the sweetening and flavor components, is glycerin which can be included in an amount of up to 18% based on weight. Since glycerin is hygroscopic and tends to retain and pickup moisture, it has been found that glycerin can be effectively used in very low amounts ranging from as low as 2% up to about 14%. Since the use according to the present invention provides an excellent, firm gum structure while at the same time providing soft chew characteristic, it has been found to be an excellent replacement for the sugar alcohol-containing sugarless gums, especially those prepared with sorbitol as a sweetening/bulking agent. Moreover, the present composition also exhibits very low-moisture pickup, which enhances its use with other components which tend to deteriorate or degrade in the presence of water. Thus, dipeptide sweeteners, such as aspartame, can be used with greater confidence. Furthermore, since the maltitol component has a high degree of sweetness, the need for high intensity sweeteners has also been significantly reduced. Thus, as a result of the present use improved chewing gum products can be produced with reduced moisture pickup and embrittlement so that gum compositions retain and possess better shelf life.
For a better understanding of the present invention together with other and further objects, reference is made to the drawings and to the following detailed description, and its scope will be pointed out in the appended claims. <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li>Figures 1 and 3 are graphs which compare the percent of moisture pickup in compositions resulting from the use according to the present invention with popular sugarless compositions; and</li><li>Figures 2 and 4 are graphs which compare the softness of compositions prepared in accordance with the use of the present invention with the texture of popular sugarless gum compositions.</li></ul>
The presently disclosed low-moisture sugarless chewing gum compositions include gum base in an amount which will vary depending on the type of gum product desired, the consistency desired, as well as the elastomeric properties. In general, the base can be included in the final chewing gum composition product and amounts from about 10 to about 75% by weight of the final chewing gum product composition, with preferred amounts being from about 15 to about 40%, and most preferably of from about 23 to about 35% by weight.
In particular, the elastomer component of the gum base can be selected from the synthetic elastomers styrene-butadiene copolymer, polyisobutylene, isobutylene-isoprene copolymer (butyl rubber), natural rubber (polyisoprene), as well as masticatory substances of natural origin, such as rubber latex solids, chicle, crown gum, nisparo, rosidinha, jelutong, pendare, perillo, niger gutta, tunu, etc. Mixtures of these materials are also useful.
The resin component, on the other hand, can be selected from polyvinyl butyl ester, copolymers of vinyl esters and vinyl ethers, polyethylene, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, vinyl acetate-vinyl alcohol copolymers, vinyl acetate vinyl laurate copolymers, and in particular high molecular weight polyvinyl acetate, which is at least 20,000 MWU.
The gum base usually includes an elastomer solvent, which may be selected from terpene resins, such as polymers of alpha-pinene or beta-pinene; rosin derivatives including hydrogenated or partially hydrogenated derivatives, such as the glycerol ester of polymerized rosin, alcohol esters of rosin, such as the glycerol ester of hydrogenated rosin, the pentaerythritol ester of hydrogenated rosin, the glyceryl ester of rosin and mixtures thereof.
The base may include an oleaginous plasticizer, such as hydrogenated vegetable oil, cocoa butter, natural waxes, petroleum waxes such as the polyethylene waxes, paraffin waxes, and microcrystalline waxes with melting points higher than 80°C, or mixtures thereof. These materials may be utilized generally as softeners.
The gum base may include mineral adjuvants such as calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, alumina, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum silicate, talc, tricalcium phosphate and the like; as well as mixtures thereof. These mineral adjuvants may serve as fillers and texturizing agents.
Fatty acids may also be included, to serve as softeners, and suitable fatty acids would include stearic acid, palmitic acid, oleic acid, and mixtures thereof. The gum bases also frequently include emulsifiers, particularly those that would be compatible with the vinyl polymer, if included in the base. Particularly, lecithin, glyceryl monostearate, fatty acid monoglycerides, diglycerides and triglycerides, glycerol triacetate, propylene glycol monostearate and mixtures thereof may be used.
The gum base composition may also include conventional additive such as antioxidants, preservatives, colorants and the like. For example, titanium dioxide may be utilized as a colorant, and an antioxidant such as butylated hydroxytoluene, butylated hydroxyanisole, propyl gallate, and mixtures thereof, may also be included.
Naturally, the gum bases may be prepared for a variety of products, including conventional gums and bubble gums, and the invention is not limited to a specific gum base formulation.
In the past, it has been found useful to use sugar alcohols such as those selected from the group consisting of sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol and mixtures thereof. The sugar alcohols were added as substantially anhydrous mixtures or components to gum compositions in a bulking-amount which bestowed on the composition an unwanted degree of moisture pick-up, both short and long term. In accordance with the present invention, while it is always possible to include sugar alcohols, it is preferable to replace nearly all the sugar alcohol with the bulking sweetening agent maltitol. Therefore, sugar alcohol can be included in an amount of up to 10%, and preferably no greater than 8%.
As previously mentioned, high intensity sweeteners can also be incorporated in the chewing gum composition. However, unlike many sugarless gum compositions, it is not necessary to rely on the high intensity sweeteners as the primary sweeteners, although they may be used as such. When used, the high intensity sweeteners can include saccharin and its various salts such a sodium or calcium salts; cyclamic acid and its various salts such as the sodium salt; the dipeptide sweeteners such as aspartame; amino acid based sweeteners; dihydrochalcone; glycyrrhizin; <u style="single">Stevia</u><u style="single">rebaudiana</u> (Stevioside); chlorinated sucrose derivatives such as sucrolose; lycasin; and other high intensity sweeteners. Since the high intensity sweeteners need not be the primary sweeteners in the present compositions, they can be included in amounts as low as 0.01 to 3% by weight, and are preferably included in amounts from 0.025 to only 1.5% by weight.
Other conventional ingredients which may be added to the gum composition include a flavor component such as flavoring agents selected from the group consisting of natural or synthetic flavor oils and extracts derived from plants, leaves, flowers, fruits and so forth, and combinations thereof. Representative flavor agents include: spearmint oil, cinnamon oil, oil of wintergreen (methylsalicylate) and peppermint oils. Also considered useful are the natural or synthetic fruit flavors such as citrus oil including lemon, orange, grape, lime and grapefruit and fruit essences including apple, strawberry, cherry, pineapple and so forth. Other ingredients which are useful in the flavor component include citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid and the like, as well as mixtures thereof.
Although glycerin is considered to be a humectant, it has been found that it also enhances preservation of the chewing gum composition as a whole over a period of time. Therefore it may be desirable to include glycerin in an anhydrous gum product even though moisture pick-up is unwanted. Accordingly, glycerin may be included in the composition preferably in anhydrous form, such as commercially available in the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) grade. If glycerin is included in the composition, it is preferably used up to no more than 18%, and most preferably from 2 to 14% based on weight of the composition.
Key, however, to the present invention is the discovery of the ability to use a low-moisture pick-up sweetener/bulking agent which can be included in amounts to replace sugar alcohol in a sugarless gum composition to: (1) significantly reduce the moisture pick-up over a period of time and (2) to provide structural integrity simultaneously with a soft chew characteristic. In particular, the bulking sweetening agent used in the present invention is maltitol, which is reduced maltose and can be identified as 0-alpha-glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol. The chemical structure is shown below: <chemistry id="chem0001" num="0001"><img file="EP0325090B1_D0001.tif" /></chemistry> Maltitol is known to have a relative sweetness when compared to sucrose of from 0.80 to 0.90, which makes it an ideal sweetener/bulking agent to replace the hygroscopic sugar alcohols, since little or no supplemental sweeteners need be added. Moreover, the use of maltitol provides low-moisture pick-up while at the same time enhancing the chew Experiments were conducted to compare the chewing gum composition resulting from the use according to the present invention with sugarless, anhydrous compositions prepared with sugar alcohols. The data clearly indicates the superior and unexpected results achieved by use of the invention.
EXAMPLES
Sugarless chewing gum compositions were prepared using the following formulations. <tables id="tabl0001" num="0001"><table frame="all"><tgroup cols="3" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="52.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="52.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="52.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">INGREDIENT</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">PERCENT BY WEIGHT</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" /><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">CONTROL 1</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">SAMPLE 1</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Gum Base</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">22.98%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">22.98%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Sorbitol</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">55.57%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.00%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Mannitol</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">7.07%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">7.07%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Maltitol</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.00%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">55.57%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Glycerin</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">12.00%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">12.00%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Softener</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.50</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.50%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Flavorant</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">1.70</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">1.70%</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Color Agent</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.18%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.18%</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
Figure 1 shows the results of moisture pick-up tests conducted over a period of five weeks. Tests were conducted to determine the amount of moisture absorbed by samples maintained at a temperature of 27°C (80°F) and at a relative room humidity of 80%. As can be seen from Fig. 1, the gums containing maltitol did not absorb as much moisture as the gums containing the sorbitol. In fact the amount of moisture picked up by the maltitol composition over five weeks is only about one-half the moisture picked up by the sorbitol compositions. This is a significant improvement over sugarless, glycerin-sorbitol containing gums which is as high as 36.37% after a five week period.
Figure 2 depicts the results of an accelerated aging Instron test which was conducted to show the retention of a soft chew characteristic. Since each of the inventive compositions possessed sufficient structural integrity to retain a "chunk" shape, firmness to bite, or softness, was measured.
The equipment used was the Instron Model 1130 with a digital readout from Valtec Associates Inc. Pieces of gum from each of the examples were used. Initially unused gum pieces were stored in a desiccator at 23°C and 23% room humidity. Basically a 3/16 inch plunger was brought to bear against the surface of the gum and a controlled force was exerted until penetration of the surface occurred. The results, which are measured in pounds (0.45 kg), are shown in Fig. 2.
The gum pieces prepared in accordance with the present invention were found to be nearly twice as soft (e.g., or one-half as hard) as the control sorbitol-containing composition.
Further compositions were prepared for testing in accordance with the following formulations. Both the second control and inventive compositions were prepared in the absence of glycerin. <tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><table frame="all"><tgroup cols="3" colsep="1" rowsep="0"><colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="52.50mm" /><colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="52.50mm" /><colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="52.50mm" /><thead valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">INGREDIENT</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="center">CONTROL 2</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="center">SAMPLE 2</entry></row></thead><tbody valign="top"><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Gum Base</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">17.06%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">17.06%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Anhydrous Mineral Adjuvant</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">2.04%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">2.04%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Sorbitol</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">45.65%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.00%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Mannitol</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">17.97%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">17.97%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Maltitol</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.00%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">45.65%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Hydrogenerated Starch Hydrolysate</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">5.00%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">5.00%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Softener</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.57%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.57%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Flavorant</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">1.07%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">1.07%</entry></row><row><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Color Agent</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">0.07%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">0.07%</entry></row><row rowsep="1"><entry namest="col1" nameend="col1" align="left">Binder</entry><entry namest="col2" nameend="col2" align="char" char=".">10.57%</entry><entry namest="col3" nameend="col3" align="char" char=".">10.57%</entry></row></tbody></tgroup></table></tables>
Tests were conducted on Control 2 and Sample 2 specimens as they had been conducted on Control 1 and Sample 1 specimens, and the results are shown in Figures 3 and 4. In Figure 3 the moisture pick-up by the inventive composition over five weeks has been shown to be phenomenally low, e.g., only about 12% of the moisture picked up by the control specimen. Figure 4 depicts the relative hardness developed in the specimens over a twelve week period, which is less than about one-half for the invention composition.
These results very clearly show the unusual combination of characteristics of the compositions resulting from the use according to the present invention, which includes both low-moisture pick-up and softness over a period of time.
5 sheets
Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 Sheet 4 Sheet 5
Every citation, both waysCites: the store holds 6 of 7
| Document | Relation | Office |
|---|---|---|
| EP0082670A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) |
| EP0185595A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) |
| EP0302023A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) |
| WO8501862A | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) |
| WO8808671A | Cites | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) |
| FR2499576A | Cites | France |
| FSTA LECTURE, no. 84-09-10662, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 6TH CONGRESS. DIV. FOR NUTR. & FOOD RES; R.L. de FIELLIETTAZ GOETHART et al.: "Evaluation of maltitol in eight food products: comparison with sucrose, fructose and sorbitol", & PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2. 8-9, 1983 | Non-patent | – |
27 members in 15 offices
Priority claims5
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 139998 | United States of America | – | |
| 13999887 | United States of America | A | |
| 13999887 | United States of America | A | |
| 139998 | – | – | – |
| US19870139998 | – | – | – |
Members27
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DK733088D0 | Denmark | D0 | |
| NO885825D0 | Norway | D0 | |
| ZA887164B | South Africa | B | |
| DK733088A | Denmark | A | |
| FI886015A | Finland | A | |
| FI886015A7 | Finland | A7 | |
| FI886015L | Finland | L | |
| NO885825L | Norway | L | |
| AU2343188A | Australia | A | |
| AU2343188A | Australia | A | |
| EP0325090A2 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A2 | |
| KR890009287A | Republic of Korea | A | |
| JPH01202256A | Japan | A | |
| EP0325090A3 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A3 | |
| PT89365A | Portugal | A | |
| US4933188A | United States of America | A | |
| PH25848A | Philippines | A | |
| AU617692B2 | Australia | B2 | |
| MX164188B | Mexico | B | |
| PT89365B | Portugal | B | |
| EP0325090B1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE3884372D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| ES2043885T3 | Spain | T3 | |
| DE3884372T2 | Germany | T2 | |
| HK148095A | Hong Kong, China | A | |
| US4933188B1 | United States of America | B1 | |
| JP2746347B2 | Japan | B2 |
41 legal events, as 4 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appeal reference modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNOAPAH | APAH | EP | |
| Nl: decision of oppositionOppositionNLR2 | NLR2 | EP | |
| Patent revokedRevoked27W | 27W | EP | |
| Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting stateRevoked970311GBPR | GBPR | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Patent revokedRevokedORIGINAL CODE: 0009271RDAG | RDAG | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: PATENT REVOKEDSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Appeal dossier modifiedAppealORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPOAPAC | APAC | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Nl: opposition has been filed with the epoOppositionNLR1 | NLR1 | EP | |
| Opposition filed (corrected)OppositionR26 | R26 | EP | |
| Se: european patent has lapsedLapsedEUG | EUG | EP | |
| Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modifiedOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPOPLAB | PLAB | EP | |
| Se: european patent in force in swedenEAL | EAL | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Nl: opposition has been filed with the epoOppositionNLR1 | NLR1 | EP | |
| Opposition filedOpposition26 | 26 | EP | |
| Opposition filedOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009260PLBI | PLBI | EP | |
| Validation in greece3009825FG4A | FG4A | GR | |
| Definitive protectionFG2A | FG2A | ES | |
| It: last paid annual feeITTA | ITTA | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0325090
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0325090
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0325090
- Application
- 88810890
- Application, DOCDB
- 88810890
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19880810890
Titles3
- German
- Die Verwendung von Maltitiol in Kaugummimassen zur Verbesserung der physikalischen Stabilität
- English
- Use of maltitiol in chewing gum compositions for improved physical stability
- French
- L'utilisation de maltitiol dans une composition de gomme à mâcher pour améliorer la stabilité physique
Classification
- CPC, 4
- A23G4/06
- A23G4/10
- Y10S426/804
- A23G4/08
- IPC, 4
- A23G4 00
- A23G4 06
- A23G4 10
- A23L27 30
Designated states1
- Contracting states, 1
- Sweden
