Angulated ultrasonic surgical handpieces.
Abstract
An improved ultrasonic surgical handpiece (10) includes an angled connecting body (72) between the transducer (72) and an operating tip (74), the connecting body being bent at a point between the node and the anti-node at its respective ends and with a second plane nodal support in the transducer section. The vibratory assembly (14) has an impedance corresponding to the frequency of a handpiece using a straight connecting body of substantially equal length and dimension so that straight and bent handpieces can be used interchangeably in an ultrasound surgical system using a common drive system and common work tips. In a preferred embodiment,
Term
Term ended
Projected expiry passed 24 November 2006, 19.8 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Published
- Projected expiry
- Today
6 claims: 6 independent, 0 dependent
- 1Claims of equivalent WO 8703467 A1 WHAT IS CLAIMED:1. In an ultrasonic surgical handpiece for breaking apart and removing tissue from a recessed operative site,' the handpiece including a vibration assembly having an elongated straight transducer oper- able to convert high frequency electrical energy to high frequency mechanical vibrations, an elongated connecting body having one end rigidly joined to one end of the elongated transducer, and an elongated straight operative tip removably mounted on the other end of the connecting body, the vibrating assembly having an overall length substantially equal to the length of the longitudinal vibration wave λ when vibrated at the resonant frequency F of the assembly, the vibration wave λ having an antinodal plane adjacent to the joined ends of the transducer and connecting body, and a nodal plane adjacent to the other end of the connecting body, the improvement wherein said con- necting body comprises, a first substantially straight portion having a longitudinal axis coincident with the longitudinal axis x of said transducer and a second substantially straight portion having a longitudinal axis X' extending at an angle α with respect to axis X, said connecting body having a circular cross section throughout at least a major portion of its length and having a portion of its mass removed from its outer surface at a location adjacent to said nodal plane relative to the mass of a straight connecting body of the same cross-section whereby the resonant frequency of the angled vibrating assembly is substantially iden- tical to the resonant frequency of said vibration assembly having a straight connection of equal length and dimension and having said straight connecting body but without the mass removed from the connecting body.
- 2The ultrasonic surgical handpiece defined in Claim 1 wherein the mass removed from said connecting body comprises a pair of substantially parallel flats milled into diametrically opposite sides of said con- necting body.
- 3The ultrasonic surgical handpiece defined in Claim 2 wherein said flats lie in planes parallel to the plane containing axes X and X1.
- 4The ultrasonic surgical handpiece defined in Claim 3 wherein the mass removed from said connecting body is determined by the formula:M * [•?— p] [CB-C3 cos α ] wherein D = Diameter of the connecting body at the nodal plane p = Volume density of the connecting body material CB = Length of the angled portion
- 5The ultrasonic surgical handpiece defined in Claim 1 wherein said transducer has a nodal plane loca- ted midway between its ends and said handpiece further comprises support means located at said nodal plane of said transducer for supporting said transducer.
- 6The ultrasonic surgical handpiece defined in Claim 5 wherein said support means includes means for permitting fluid flow through said support means. 7. The ultrasonic surgical handpiece defined in Claim 6 wherein said support means for said transducer comprises radially inwardly directed projections on a support member surrounding said transducer.
Independent claims6
11 paragraphs, as filed
Description of equivalent WO 8703467 A1
Angulated Ultrasonic Surgical Handpieces.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention This invention relates to ultrasonic surgical instruments useful in removing tissue from within a biological structure, and more particularly to an improved ultrasonic surgical handpiece employing a transducer and an angled connecting body, and to an improved method of producing such an instrument. Description of the Prior Art Ultrasonic surgical instruments, generally referred to as handpieces, first met acceptance for use in eye surgery, particularly in the removal of cata- racts, and presently are widely used for various sur- gical procedures. The known ultrasonic handpieces generally employ piezoelectric or magnetostriσtive transducers capable of transforming high frequency electrical energy into mechanical impulses or vibra- tions and essentially consist of an elongated trans- ducer having one end rigidly joined, as by brazing or welding, to an elongated connecting member which, in turn, supports an elongated operative probe or tip on its other end. The vibrating electromechanical assem- bly, including the transducer, connecting member and probe, are supported by a housing through connecting means which isolates the housing from the mechanical vibrations and provides connections for cooling fluid for the assembly and electrical energy to drive the transducer. Known ultrasonic handpieces of this general type are disclosed, for. example, in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,693,613 and 3,805,787. The known ultrasonic handpieces in which the oper- ative probe extends coaxially with the housing gener- ally are constructed as 3/4 λ transducers, i.e.,<sup>"</sup> the length of the transducer and connecting member consti- tute 3/4 of a wavelength,<sup>'</sup> and a matched 1/4 λ tip oper- ative probe mounted on the connecting member completes the full wavelength, with the tip connecting plane being at or closely adjacent to the nodal plane. While these ultrasonic handpieces are widely used in the surgical theatre, their straightline design limits their utility for certain procedures. For example, when the operative site is deep within a biological body, good visibility is not always possible since the housing and the surgeon's hand supporting the housing may interfere with the line of sight to the operative tip. Also, such prior art straight ultrasonic hand- pieces are of particularly limited utility in micro- surgery because the handpiece and the surgeon's hand interfere with the operating microscope. One attempt to provide an ultrasonic surgical handpiece to overcome the difficulties of the straight handpieces described above is disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,526,571. In this prior art device, a conventional straight transducer assembly is employed to the con- ventional nodal point mounting for the operative tip, bu a 1/2 λ curved extension is inserted between the operative probe and its conventional mounting point to provide in effect, a 3/4 λ extension in which the lon- gitudinal axis of the operative tip is displaced at an angle, for example, 15°, from the longitudinal axis of the transducer assembly. This assembly has success- fully solved the problem of visibility at the operative site when working in a deep, restrictive access body opening, but the added length of the overall assembly may reduce the ability of the device to be used in conjunction with an operating microscope in certain conditions. Further,' some surgeons accustomed to hand- ling the shorter straight handpieces find it difficult to interchange the longer handpiece because of the difference in maneuverability and balance. Thus, there remains a need for an improved surgical handpiece designed to provide improved visibility at the oper- ative tip and to provide minimal interference with an operating microscope. It is also known that longitudinal ultrasonic vibrations may be transmitted through an elongated member made up of alternate straight and curved or bent sections. For example, U.S. Patent No. 3,546,498 dis- closes a transmission line made up of a series of straight segments joined by short radius bends located at critical locations, i.e., the nodes or antinodes in the transmission element. A primary object of the present invention is to provide an improved ultrasonic surgical handpiece which overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art handpieces discussed above. Another object is to provide an improved angled ultrasonic surgical handpiece which is shorter and more maneuverable than the known curved handpieces. Another object is to provide such an ultrasonic surgical handpiece employing a connecting body which is bent at a location between the nodal and anti-nodal planes adjacent to its ends whereby the axis of the operative tip is disposed at an angle with respect to the axis of the transducer. Another object is to provide such an ultrasonic surgical handpiece having an improved balance in the surgeon's hand and which is therefore more maneuverable and less fatiguing in use. Another object is to provide such an improved ultrasonic surgical handpiece for use in connection with operating microscopes and which will not substantially interfere with the use of such microscopes when using at least a 300 millimeter objective lens. Another object is to provide such an ultrasonic handpiece in which the operative tip and drive compo- nents of compatible straight and angled handpieces may be interchanged. Another object of the invention is to provide a means for producing an angled ultrasonic surgical hand- piece which is sufficiently short to be both maneu- verable and less fatiguing in the surgeon's hand while not substantially interfering with the use of an oper- ating microscope, and in which a 1/4 λ operative tip of a compatible straight handpiece may be employed. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In the attainment of the foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention,' an important feature resides in providing an improved angulated ultrasonic surgical handpiece which may be used inter- changeably with known straight handpieces by operating room personnel with a minimum of confusion. The hand- piece is designed to plug into and operate with com er- cially available compatible console systems of corre- sponding frequency and to function with existing sur- gical tips supplied for use with such commercially available compatible straight handpieces. This is accomplished by providing a connecting member bent at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the transducer at a point intermediate the connector body ends, i.e., between the nodal and antinodal planes at the ends of the connecting body, and by impedance matching the angled transducer to the compatible straight transducer and to the interchangeable tip at the desired operating frequency. To accomplish this, the angled and straight connecting bodies are constructed of the same axial length, and a portion of the mass of the angled con- nector body is removed at or near the nodal plane,' i.e., near the point of connection of the operative tip. Preferably, this material is removed by milling flats from two opposite sides of the connector body, with the flats lying in planes parallel to the plane containing the longitudinal axes of the straight and angled portions of the connecting body. Brief Description of the Drawings The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed des- cription contained hereinbelow, taken in conjunction with the drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a longitudinal sectional view of a prior art straight ultrasonic surgical handpiece over which the present invention is an improvement; Fig. 2 is a plan view, partially in section, of the transducer assembly and operative tip portion of an ultrasonic surgical handpiece embodying the present invention; Fig. 3 is an elevation view of the apparatus shown in Fig. 2.; Fig. 4 is an enlarged elevation view of the con- nector body portion of the apparatus shown in Fig. 3; Fig. 5 is a sectional view taken on line 5-5 of Fig. 4; and Fig. 6 is a composite view showing the longitu- dinal axes of a straight and an angled handpiece super- imposed. Fig. 7A is a partial elevation view in partial cross section of the angled handpiece of this invention showing the support means located at the nodal plane. Fig. 7B is a cross section of the embodiment of Fig. 7A at the nodal plane Z-Z. Description of the Preferred Embodiment Referring now to the drawings in detail. Fig. 1 shows an ultrasonic aspirator of the general type illustrated,<sup>'</sup> for example, in U.S. Patent No. 3,693,613," still widely used in surgical practice and over which the present invention is an improvement. The ultra- sonic surgical handpiece is indicated generally by the reference numeral 10 and includes a housing member 12 enclosing and supporting the vibration-inducing asse - bly indicated generally by the numeral 14. Assembly 14 includes a magnetostrictive transducer element 16 and an amplifying or connecting member or body 18 having a removable operative tip 20 mounted on its distal end. High frequency electrical energy to drive the trans- ducer is provided through conductors 22 connected to a coil 24 surrounding the transducer 16 within the housing 12. Cooling fluid is circulated through the housing by way of inlet and outlet conduits 26, 28, respectively. The vibrating body assembly 14 is mounted within the cavity 30 of a support element 32 which, in turn, is mounted on the end of and projects into the housing 12. A pair of resilient gasket members 36 disposed one on each side of a radially extending flange 34 support and effectively isolate the element 32 and housing 12 from vibrations induced by the assembly 14. An irrigation and aspiration fluid housing 38 is mounted on the end of support element 32 as by threaded connection 40, and retains the resilient gasket members 36 firmly in position. A fluid inlet 42 communicates with a cylindrical fluid chamber 44 between the hollow cylindrical body portion 46 of the housing 38 and the outer surface of the elongated tubular portion 48 of the connecting member 18. A resilient O-ring seal 50 is provided between members 46 and 48 to prevent the flow of irrigation fluid toward the handpiece. A removable sleeve member 52 is mounted on the distal end of housing 38 and extends in surround relation to the operative tip 20. An aspiration passage 56 extends longitudinally through probe 20 from its free end and communicates with an axial passage in the elongated tubular portion 46 of the connecting body 18. Passage 58 has an outlet communicating with a chamber 60 within housing 38 between the O-ring seal 50 and the gasket seal members 46, and an outlet conduit 62 communicating with the chamber 60 is connected to a source of vacuum for aspi- rating irrigation fluid and emulsified tissue from the operative site. The basic construction and operation of the ultra- sonic surgical handpiece according to the present invention is substantially similar to the prior art device just described with the exception of the con- figuration of the vibration-inducing assembly and accordingly only the vibrating components of the ultra- sonic surgical handpiece of the present invention are illustrated in the drawings and described herein. Referring initially to Fig. 2, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the vibra- ting structure 68 includes a magnetostrictive trans- ducer element 70 rigidly mounted on and supported by a transmitter element or connecting body 72 adapted to be mounted in a support element and housing in the manner described above. The magnetostrictive element 70 and connecting body 72 together make up a 3/4 λ transducer assembly, and a 1/4 λ operative tip 74 is mounted on the opposite end of the connecting body to complete the full wavelength, with the connection between the tip and connecting body being at or close to the nodal plane. Whether a straight transducer assembly as illustrated in the prior art apparatus of Fig. 1 or the angled assembly shown in Figs. 2-6, the transducer is designed to vibrate at a predetermined resonant fre- quency when a properly designed operative tip is attached to the connecting body. In order to enable a particular operative tip to resonate along its longitudinal axis at the same fre- quency whether mounted on a transducer assembly inclu- ding a straight or an angled connecting body, the transducers must be impedance matched to the tip at the desired or designed frequency for the tip. In prac- tice, for a tip designed to resonate at a frequency F, there is a window of frequencies extending above and below the designed frequency in which the assembly will successfully operate. This window of frequencies may be stated as 2 Δ F, or F F<sub>Q</sub>± Δ F, and thus the ultrasonic generator, or driving unit, is designed to drive the transducer at frequencies within the window F<sub>Q</sub>± Δ F. If an angled transducer connecting element is constructed by,< in effect, bending the* straight con- necting body, and if the operative tip resonates at a frequency F with a straight transducer, the tip mounted on the angled connecting body will operate at a dif- ferent frequency F', and the change in frequencies is the same as if the straight connecting body were made shorter. Referring to Fig. 6 the longitudinal central axis X of a straight transducer and the longitudinal axis X' of the angled portion 76 of a transducer in accordance with the present invention are superimposed, with axis X' intersecting axis X at point C and being disposed at an angle with respect thereto. Note that the end of the connecting end straight member 18 is connected to the transducer 16 at the second antinodal plane, the first antinodal plane being at the opposite or rear end of the transducer element 16. A first nodal plane is located intermediate the first and second antinodal planes at approximately the midpoint of the magneto- strictive transducer element, and the second nodal plane is adjacent the end of the connecting body. As shown in Fig. 6,' the superimposed longitudinal central axes of the straight connecting body 18 and the angled connecting body 72 are locate<sup>'</sup>d at the first antinodal plane indicated at point A. In accordance with the present invention, the connecting body of the angled handpiece is made to resonate along the axis X' which extends at an angle α to the axis X of the straight handpiece, with both transducers being designed to use the same operative tip. If the central longitudinal axis of the straight and angled connecting bodies are the same length, the straight transducer assembly will resonate at a frequency F, while the angled transducer assembly will resonate at a frequency F' . The frequency F' corresponds to the frequency of a shorter straight connecting body. In Fig. 6, A3 represents the overall length of the straight connecting member and AD represents the dis- tance from the antinodal plane at A,<sup>1</sup> to the nodal plane adjacent the free end of the straight connecting member. Point C represents the point of intersection of axes X and X' , and point E represent the end of the angled connecting member along axis X' . From the draw- ings, it is seen that AB = AC + CE <sup>x</sup> cos α = AC + AD. Thus, the effective length AD of the angled connecting member is less than the length AB of the straight con- necting member, and the natural frequency F' of the angled connecting member is therefore greater than the frequency of the straight connecting member. As is known, the vibrating acoustic elements of ultrasonic surgical handpieces are usually supported at or close to the nodal plane to minimize the power dis- sipation. If the mechanical design is such as to pro- vide an acoustic assembly vibrating at a resonant fre- quency F, and this frequency is changed, the location of the nodal points are also changed with a consequent increase in power dissipation and drop in efficiency. However, as previously stated, systems of this type generally are designed to operate within a narrow window of frequencies extending above and below the optimized frequency F<sub>n</sub>, i.e., an acceptable operating frequency F = optimum F<sub>Q</sub> ± Δ F. Within this window of frequencies, efficiency remains substantially constant for practicable purposes but outside the window, sta- bility of the driving generator is unpredictable. In order to match the frequency of angled and straight connecting bodies to enable both straight and angled handpieces to be used interchangeably with a given system and operative tip, it has been found that the angled transducer can be matched to the tip fre- quency F without changing its length ACE in Fig. 6. This is accomplished in accordance with the present invention by removing a calculated amount of mass of the angled portion 76 of connecting member 72 adjacent the nodal plane, preferably by milling corresponding flats 78, 80 on diametrically opposite surfaces of the connecting body which are otherwise substantially cir- cular in cross section throughout their length. The flats preferably lie in planes parallel to the plane containing the longitudinal axes of the angles and straight portions of the connecting bodies. The amount of mass and the configuration of the milled portions may be calculated by solving the following equation:
(pSdx) _l— ____H <sub>ax</sub>
3t<sup>2</sup> 3x wherein P = Volume density S = Cross-sectional area (PSdx) = Represents the mass of fraction dx
ξ = Displacement Y _= Young's modulus An exact solution to the above equation is extremely involved and the practical solution requires many approximations to be taken for placing the proper boundary conditions for mass loaded vibrating bars. In practice, the solution may be achieved with only a few trial and error attempts, according to the following calculation for approximating the mass to be removed:
2 π D*-** M ~ [ ^^ p ] [CB-CB cos α ]
wherein D = Diameter of the connecting body at the nodal plane
p = Volume density of the connecting body material
CB = Length of the angled portion
Utilizing this method, an angled connecting body having the same length as a straight connecting body may be designed to resonate along its axis X' at the same frequency as the straight connecting body, with the bend or angle in the connecting body being located at a point intermediate the node and antinode planes. As indicated previously, acoustic vibrators normally are designed straight to the nodal support point to thereby allow direct axial vector forces to be transmitted along the acoustic vibrator and into the amplifying tip. Bending, if employed, of such acoustic vibrators has therefore normally been accomplished at or after the nodal point support as taught in the above- mentioned Patent No. 3,546,498. Bending of an acoustic vibrator behind the support nodal plane (Y-Y) normally results in excessive acous- tic vibrator losses accompanied by a shift in operating frequency of the acoustic assembly. The losses are due, in large part, to the non- axial loading created by the bent portion of the con- necting body. The non-axial load creates a force vector which has a radial as well as an axial compo- nent. It is the radial component which is unwanted. The losses can be minimized in the following ways: 1. By selecting a lower operating stroke of the operative tip, as long as the selected level is suit- able for the surgical procedure desired. 2. By controlling the unwanted lateral motion of the stack, as long as the control means does not interfere with adequate cooling water flow. 3. By adjusting the mass impedence of the con- necting body as long as the mechanical fits allow a surgically useful shape. Thus, a longfelt need for an instrument enabling the use of ultrasonic surgical handpieces in delicate operations involving operating microscopes has been supplied. In addition, the appa- ratus enables the use of existing drive equipment and operative tips whereby operating room personnel can readily interchange the angled handpiece and conven- tional straight handpieces without undergoing extensive training or retraining. In a preferred embodiment of the invention illus- trated schematically in Figure 7A and Figure 7B the magnetostrictive transducer 70 is held firmly in a support means located at the nodal plane Z-Z which tightly clamps the laminated transducer 70. In the illustrated embodiment the support means comprises radially inwardly directed projections 84 on the inner wall 86 of the support element 32. The support means includes means for permitting fluid flow therethrough in order to assure an adequate flow of cooling fluid around the transducer 70. In the illustrated embodi- ment the means for permitting fluid flow comprises apertures 88 between the projections 84. While a preferred embodiment of the invention has been disclosed and described in detail, it is under- stood that the invention is not so limited but rather that it is intended to include all embodiments which would be apparent to one skilled in the art and which come within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10398436B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10390823B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10405859B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10448948B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10342543B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433846B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10335144B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10398433B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420553B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420552B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10383630B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433844B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10357251B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10413297B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10327776B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426476B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10448952B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10463369B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10383633B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10368864B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10441281B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| USD854151S | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420549B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426477B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426478B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10357252B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10413291B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10363033B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10357247B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10398434B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10456137B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433840B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420560B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426463B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10292707B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10441280B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433837B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10441369B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10376263B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10368865B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10383634B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10245028B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10363037B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426469B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10342533B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426467B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420561B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10463384B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10368867B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420555B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10413293B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433918B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10390825B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10456140B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426471B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10245030B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10463372B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10456133B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10390829B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10448950B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433845B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10327764B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| USD851762S | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10390841B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10335151B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10335145B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10426481B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10405857B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10258330B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10357246B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10258418B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10413294B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10363036B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10463370B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10463383B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10342541B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10405854B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10368863B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10363031B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10420550B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10433849B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10245033B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10441285B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP0139753A1 | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | Search report |
| FR2047015A1 | Cites | France | Search report |
| US3908661A | Cites | United States of America | Search report |
13 members in 7 offices
Priority claims5
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19850808573 | United States of America | – | |
| 80857385 | United States of America | A | |
| 80857385 | United States of America | A | |
| 808573 | – | – | – |
| US19850808573 | – | – | – |
Members13
| Document | Office | Kind | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4634419A | United States of America | A | |
| IL80941A0 | Israel | A0 | |
| IL80941D0 | Israel | D0 | |
| WO8703467A1 | World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | A1 | |
| EP0248844A1This record | European Patent Office (EPO) | A1 | |
| JPS63501845A | Japan | A | |
| EP0248844A4 | European Patent Office (EPO) | A4 | |
| CA1258021A | Canada | A | |
| JPH0367411B2 | Japan | B2 | |
| IL80941A | Israel | A | |
| EP0248844B1 | European Patent Office (EPO) | B1 | |
| DE3687459D1 | Germany | D1 | |
| DE3687459T2 | Germany | T2 |
39 legal events, as 4 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patentCeasedNLV7 | NLV7 | EP | |
| Patent expired after termination of 20 yearsExpiredPE20 | PE20 | GB | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Transmission of propertyTP | TP | FR | |
| European patent in force as of 2002-01-01IF02 | IF02 | GB | |
| Nl: assignments of ep-patentsNLS | NLS | EP | |
| Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)732E | 732E | GB | |
| Se: european patent has lapsedLapsedEUG | EUG | EP | |
| Patent ceasedCeasedPL | PL | CH | |
| Be: lapsedLapsedBERE | BERE | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Se: european patent in force in swedenEAL | EAL | EP | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Fr: translation filedET | ET | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| It: translation for a ep patent filedITF | ITF | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)RAP1 | RAP1 | EP | |
| Supplementary search report drawn up and despatchedA4 | A4 | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0248844
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0248844
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0248844
- Application
- 86907211
- Application, DOCDB
- 86907211
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19860907211
Titles3
- German
- ULTRASCHALLCHIRURGISCHE WERKZEUGE MIT WINKELN
- English
- ANGULATED ULTRASONIC SURGICAL HANDPIECES
- French
- PIECES A MAIN CHIRURGICALES ULTRASONIQUES A ANGLE
Classification
- CPC, 3
- A61F9/00745
- A61M1/0084
- A61M1/85
- IPC, 4
- A61B18 00
- A61B17 20
- A61F9 007
- A61M1 00
Designated states9
- Contracting states, 9
- Belgium
- Switzerland
- Germany
- France
- United Kingdom
- Italy
- Liechtenstein
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Sweden