Blended-fibre filter material
Abstract
This record has no abstract on file.
Term
Term ended
Expired 14 May 2007, 19.4 years ago.
- Priority
- Filed
- Granted
- Expired
- Today
23 claims: 4 independent, 19 dependent
- 1A method of making a filter material for capturing dust, comprising taking (i) polyolefine fibres and removing lubricant and anti-static agent or ensuring the absence of lubricant and anti-static agent, taking (ii) fibres of an addition polymer comprising one or more halogen-substituted polyolefines, removing lubricant and anti-static agent from the fibres (ii), and blending the fibres (i) and (ii).
- 2A method according to Claim 1, wherein the said halogen-substituted polyolefine is halogen-substituted polyethylene or polypropylene.
- 4A method according to Claim 3, wherein the fibres (ii) are polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, vinyl chloride - vinylidene chloride copolymer, chlorinated polyvinyl chloride or polytetrafluorethylene.
- 5A method according to Claim 3, wherein the fibres (ii) are modacrylic.
- 6A method according to Claim 5, wherein the modacrylic is a copolymer comprising from 35 to 85 weight percent acrylonitrile units and having the balance made up substantially of halogenated hydrocarbon.
- 8A method according to Claim 7, wherein the modacrylic comprises at least 44% acrylonitrile.
- 9A method according to Claim 8, wherein the modacrylic comprises at least 50% acrylonitrile.
- 13A method according to Claim 12, wherein the ratio of fibre (i) to fibre (ii) is from 40:60 to 70:30 by surface area.
- 15A method according to Claim 14, wherein the fibre diameters are from 10 to 25 micrometres.
- 18A method according to Claim 17, wherein the fibre staple length is from 40 to 100 mm.
- 21A method according to Claim 20, wherein the felt is made by carding the fibres into a fleece and needling them.
- 22The use of a filter material, made by the method of any preceding claim without any step detracting from the cleanliness of the fibres, for capturing dust electrostatically.
Independent claims15
27 paragraphs, as filed
0001This invention is a filter material of blended fibres. The filter material may find application in dust helmets, respirators, suction cleaners and air-conditioning systems as a disposable filter element, and even as a duster.
0002In air filters, a low resistance to air flow is desirable, coupled with, of course, a high filtration efficiency (= a high probability that a particle borne in the air flow through the filter will be captured by the filter). These properties can be met by a filter material having an open structure but carrying electric charge, to attract dust particles. Such a filter material is described in GB-A-384052, wherein wool fibres are carded with resin particles. In this filter material, the action during manufacture of rubbing the wool against the resin imparts a persistent negative charge to the resin and an induced positive charge to the wool. These charges attract dust particles.
0003It would be desirable to find an air filter with a high filtration efficiency, which is reasonably priced, which has a low resistance to air flow and which is non-flammable.
0004According to the present invention, a filter material for capturing dust comprises a blend of (i) polyolefine fibres and (ii) fibres of an addition polymer comprising one or more halogen substituted polyolefines, wherein the fibres (i) and the fibres (ii) both have no coating of lubricant or antistatic agent and are clean and are preferably in the ratio by surface area (i):(ii)= 30:70 to 80:20; the halogen is preferably fluorine or chlorine, and the polyolefine is preferably polyethylene or polypropylene. The fibres (ii) could thus contain for example one or more of chloroethylene units, for example -CHCl-CH₂- or -CCl₂-CH₂-, or tetrafluoroethylene units -CF₂-CF₂-, and may also contain acrylonitrile units -CH₂-C(CN)H-, and could thus be for example polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, vinyl chloride vinylidene chloride copolymer, chlorinated polyvinyl chloride, polytetrafluorethylene or (preferably) modacrylic.
0005The invention also includes a method of making such a filter material, by steps set forth later, including the step of cleaning the fibres. By "clean" we mean that the fibre has no coating of lubricant or anti-static agent, or that any such coating was removed before blending, for example by scouring with a non-ionic detergent. By "modacrylic" we mean a copolymer comprising from 35 to 85 weight percent acrylonitrile units and preferably having the balance made up substantially of other addition-polymer-forming units, being halogenated hydrocarbon such as vinyl chloride or vinylidene chloride.
0006The polyolefine fibres (i) may be polyethylene, ethylene-propylene copolymer, or (preferably) polypropylene.
0007The modacrylic is preferably Kanekalon (trade mark) by Kanegafuchi Chem. Co. and Kanekalon Co. of Japan or Teklan (trade mark) by Courtaulds. Kanekalon comprises 55 weight % vinyl chloride. Teklan comprises 50 weight % of vinylidene chloride and under 2 weight % of a third monomer for providing dye sites. The balance in both cases is substantially acrylonitrile. The modacrylic preferably comprises at least 40, more preferably at least 44, most preferably at least 50 weight % acrylonitrile.
0008The ratio of fibre (i) to fibre (ii) is preferably from 30:70 to 80:20 by surface area, more preferably from 40:60 to 70:30.
0009The fibres are preferably finer than 100 micrometres, preferably from 10 to 25 micrometres and preferably the fibre (i) cross-sectional area does not differ from the fibre (ii) cross-sectional area by more than a factor of 3. Staple length is preferably from 30 to 200 mm, more preferably 40 to 100 mm. The fibres (i) or (ii) or both are preferably crimped.
0010Preferably the material is a felt, preferably made by carding the fibres into a fleece and needling them. The carding is preferably performed by passing the material over a conventional two-swift card, or to substantially the equivalent extent by any alternative means. (The carding is likely to impose a practical limit on the fine-ness of usable fibres. The finer the fibres, the more efficient the filter but the higher the resistance to air flow.) The carding step must not be allowed to contaminate the fibres with anti-static agent or lubricant.
0011The invention will now be described by way of example.
0012The filter material is a mixture of two different crimped synthetic polymer fibres carded into a fleece and then needled to form a felt. The fibres are well mixed, and they became electrically charged during carding. The electric charge that they hold is critical in effecting the capture of small dust particles by the material.
0013The first fibre is polypropylene 20 micrometres thick, which in commerce is 2.8 decitex (n tex = n g/km). This may be e.g. round or trilobal. Polypropylene from various manufacturers has been tried, and found to be fairly consistent. Pigmented polypropylene is acceptable. Commercially produced polypropylene fibres normally have on them a "spin finish", which is a mixture of lubricant and anti-static agent. Polypropylene can be made finish-free quite easily, but usually it is not. This finish is removed before the fibres are carded. Any of the usual processes of textile scouring could be used, such as detergent, alkali or solvent scouring; scouring with a non-ionic detergent is quite effective provided it is thorough. Then the fibre is well rinsed.
0014The second fibre is modacrylic 18 micrometres thick, in particular Teklan (described above) of 3.5 decitex. Dyed modacrylic fibre is acceptable but undyed modacrylic fibre is preferred. Commercial modacrylic fibre cannot in practice be made without a "spin finish", which (as with polypropylene) is a mixture of lubricant and antistatic agent. This finish is removed before the fibres are carded. Any of the usual processes of textile scouring could be used, such as detergent, alkali or solvent scouring; scouring with a non-ionic detergent is quite effective provided it is thorough. Some benefit may be obtained from an alkali scour or chemical leaching. Acid scouring is not recommended.
0015These fibres are carded using a two-swift card, each swift having four worker-stripper units, in weight proportions 60 polypropylene: 40 modacrylic, i.e. to give surface areas roughly in the ratio 2:1, polypropylene: modacrylic, into a fleece. The carding causes both fibres to acquire electric charge, which, after falling during the next day, thereafter remains at a fairly constant level for several months. The fleece has a mass of 1.5 kg per square metre.
0016The fleeces are lightly needled, using a needle-punching loom, at 8mm penetration, 25 needlings/cm², to form a felt. Depending on the end use, where a stiffer or denser felt is wanted, heavier needling may be preferable.
0017The fibre processing machines (i.e. card and needle-loom) are kept clean to avoid contaminating the fibres, especially with spin finish from previous batches. Although not strictly essential, preferably all-metal card clothing is used, and if the needle-loom has boards with wooden backs, a new board should be used. Card clothing is usually contaminated with oil, and this must be removed.
0018The fibres may be (coarsely) mixed using a blender before the carding. The blender should likewise be kept clean. The carding completes the mixing, but if this is inadequate laterally across the fleece, a cross-laying stage can be interposed between the swifts, as is known practice.
0019The resulting filter material has low flammability, and may find use in dust helmets, disposable respirators and elsewhere.
0020The performance of the filter depends on its packing fraction (proportion of its volume occupied by fibres). Thus, the penetration of aerosols in general decreases (i.e. the filter is more effective) and the pressure drop increases (i.e. air flow is more impeded) as the packing fraction is increased at constant filter mass per unit area.
0021At a given packing fraction and mass per unit area, filters made from finer fibres are more effective than those made from coarser, but they also have a higher resistance to airflow. The choice of fibre diameter is finally governed by the purpose for which the filter is intended, but it is likely that the most useful will be made from the finest fibres that can be carded without any difficulty.
0022A 'standard' aerosol (to B.S.4400 of 1969) at a fixed filtration velocity (0.28 m s⁻¹) was used on filters according to the invention on polypropylene/wool filters, and on filters made entirely from polypropylene, the respective filters being matched in a first series of comparative tests as regards pressure drop across them (100 Pa at the filtration velocity), and being matched in a second series as to mass per unit area (1.5 kg m⁻²).
0023In the first series of tests (constant pressure drop), the penetration of the 'standard' aerosol was 0.07% through the filter of the invention. 0.40% through the polypropylene/wool filters, and 10.2% through the pure polypropylene filter. In the second series of tests (constant filter mass per unit area), the penetration of the 'standard' aerosol through the filter of the invention was 0.032%, through the polypropylene/wool filter was 0.31% and through the pure polypropylene filters was 7.0%.
0024In a further test, the filter of the invention was encapsulated in a plastic filter cartridge of a type normally used in approved respirators. The cartridge was a short cylinder of approximately 13mm depth and 70 mm diameter. The filter was subjected to a test conforming in all essential features to that part of the British Standard BS 2091 test for respirators which comprises measurement of 'standard' aerosol penetration at a volume flow rate of 30 litres/minute through the filters, and measurement of the pressure drop across the filter at a flow rate of 85 litres/minute through the filter.
0025According to the Standard, a filter is rated as Class A if the aerosol penetration is no greater than 10% and the pressure drop is no greater than 200 Pa, and it is rated as Class B if the penetration is no greater than 2% (different criteria are applied to filters of different types; 2% penetration is applied to resin wool filters; it is the most rigorous and the most appropriate for the filter of the invention) and the pressure drop no greater than 320 Pa.
00261.5 g of the material of the invention encapsulated in this way gave a penetration of 0.9% and a pressure drop of 63 Pa, and 3.0 g of the material of the invention so encapsulated gave a penetration of 0.3% and a pressure drop of 190 Pa. Both filters thus satisfied each class of the Standard.
0027Sufficient time has not elapsed for the stability of the charge on the filters described above to be conclusively established, but from previous experience it is considered that a substantial increase in aerosol penetration is likely in the first 24 hours after manufacture, followed by a much slower increase. Penetration may double in the first 24 hours; from the 24 hour value it may increase by a factor of 1.5 in one month and 1.7 in one year. The filters used in the previous comparison tests were all therefore at least one day old.
Every citation, both ways
| Document | Relation | Office | Cited during |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP2011555B2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Opposition |
| US11077394B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| EP2011556B2 | Cited by | European Patent Office (EPO) | Opposition |
| US12220659B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US7094270B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| US10814261B2 | Cited by | United States of America | Applicant |
| DE4407344C1 | Cited by | Germany | Search report |
| EP0021693A | Cites | European Patent Office (EPO) | – |
| DE2358484A | Cites | Germany | – |
| GB1188322A | Cites | United Kingdom | – |
4 priority claims, no other members on record
Priority claims4
| Document | Office | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8612070 | United Kingdom | A | |
| 8612070 | United Kingdom | – | |
| GB19860012070 | – | – | – |
| 8612070 | – | – | – |
21 legal events, as 2 offices reported them to INPADOC
Over the term
Point at a mark for the eventEvents
| Event | Code | Office | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patentCeasedNLV7 | NLV7 | EP | |
| Patent expired after termination of 20 yearsExpiredPE20 | PE20 | GB | |
| Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]LapsedPG25 | PG25 | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]GrantedPGFP | PGFP | EP | |
| European patent in force as of 2002-01-01IF02 | IF02 | GB | |
| No opposition filedOpposition26N | 26N | EP | |
| No opposition filed within time limitOppositionORIGINAL CODE: 0009261PLBE | PLBE | EP | |
| Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patentGrantedSTATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMITSTAA | STAA | EP | |
| Corresponds to:REF | REF | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| (expected) grantORIGINAL CODE: 0009210GRAA | GRAA | EP | |
| Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)RAP1 | RAP1 | EP | |
| First examination report despatched17Q | 17Q | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Search report despatchedORIGINAL CODE: 0009013PUAL | PUAL | EP | |
| Request for examination filed17P | 17P | EP | |
| Designated contracting statesAK | AK | EP | |
| Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phaseORIGINAL CODE: 0009012PUAI | PUAI | EP |
Numbers
- Publication
- 0246811
- Publication, DOCDB
- 0246811
- Publication, EPODOC
- EP0246811
- Application
- 87304270
- Application, DOCDB
- 87304270
- Application, EPODOC
- EP19870304270
Titles3
- English
- BLENDED-FIBRE FILTER MATERIAL
- German
- Filtermaterial aus Mischfasern
- French
- Matériau de filtre à fibres mélangées
Classification
- CPC, 12
- D04H1/4291
- B01D2239/064
- B01D2239/1225
- B01D2239/1233
- D04H1/425
- D04H1/43
- D04H1/435
- D04H1/4382
- D04H1/46
- D04H1/74
- Y10T428/2967
- Y10T428/2975
- IPC, 6
- B01D39 08
- D04H1 42
- D04H1 4291
- D04H1 43
- D04H1 46
- D04H1 74
Designated states3
- Contracting states, 3
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)