A jaw arrangement for a microbend sensor.

The invention relates to a jaw arrangement for a microbend sensor comprising a pair of jaws each having a facing corrugated surface for holding an optical fibre therebetween and being movable with respect to one another to bend the optical fibre to modulate light passing through the optical fibre.

Optical fibres or cables can be used to convey light between a light source and a light detector. It has been found that light in an optical fibre can be modulated by bending or otherwise distorting the fibre; this produces a modulated signal which can be picked up and processed by the light detector.

In a previously proposed microbend sensor, for example of the kind used in a vortex shedding flowmeter, a sensor beam extends into a flow of fluid the flow rate of which is to be measured. By positioning a bluff or obstruction in the flowing fluid, vortices can be formed by fluid passing over and being shed from the bluff. The vortices move the sensor beam as they pass it. The frequency of the passage of the vortices can be used as a measurement of the flow rate.

In a microbend sensor, the sensor beam has an end which is mechanically connected to one corrugated jaw of a two jaw arrangement. The other corrugated jaw is fixed in a housing of the sensor and an optical fibre is held between the corrugated jaws. The movement of the sensor beam causes squeezing and releasing of the optical fibre. Light passing through the optical fibre is thus modulated at a frequency corresponding to the passage of vortices in the fluid flow. In such microbend sensors, care should be taken to avoid overstressing of the optical fibre because this can reduce the life thereof. The optical fibre can be overstressed not only during the sensing operation, but also during a calibration step where the jaws are moved together by a determined amount in a calibration step. The jaws can inadvertently be pushed too closely together thereby damaging the optical fibre.

According to the invention there is provided a jaw arrangement for a microbend sensor comprising: a pair of jaws each having a facing corrugated surface for holding an optical fibre therebetween and being movable with respect to each other to bend the optical fibre to modulate light passing through the optical fibre, characterised in that; each corrugated surface includes a plurality of generally flat areas, disposed in a common plane extending in a direction which is substantially perpendicular to the direction of relative movement of the jaws, and a plurality of projections extending from the generally flat surfaces in the direction of relative movement of the jaws; the projections alternate with the flat areas; the projections of one of the jaws oppose the generally flat areas of the other of the jaws; and the jaws are movable together under an overload condition to cause the projections of one of the jaws to bend an optical fibre placed between the jaws against the flat areas of the other of the jaws.

Such a configuration for the jaws of a microbend sensor can accommodate overloads without adversely effecting an optical fibre held between the jaws. Thus when exposed to an overload condition pressing the jaws together, the projections press portions of the optical fibre engaged thereby against the opposed flat surfaces of the other jaw. This evenly distributes the load across the optical fibre and helps to avoid damage to the optical fibre.

The length of each projection in the direction of relative movement between the jaws is selected to be equal to a maximum allowable deflection in the microbend sensor. This is determined by several factors including for example, the allowable stresses on the optical fibre. Once each portion of the fibre has been bent into contact with the flat areas of one of the jaws, no further bending is possible. In this way the optical fibre will not be overstressed.

During normal operation, light passing through an optical fibre is modulated by the local bending of the optical fibre by each of the projections on the jaws. This bending produces a light loss in the optical fibre which can be detected as a signal corresponding to movement of one of the jaws with respect to the other of the jaws.

The invention is diagrammatically illustrated by way of example in the accompanying drawings; in which:- <ul id="ul0001" list-style="none"><li>Figure 1 is a sectional elevation of a microbend sensor in a vortex shedding flowmeter using corrugated jaws of known kind;</li><li>Figure 2 is a side elevation of corrugated jaws for a microbend sensor of the kind shown in Figure 1 and having no overload protection;</li><li>Figure 3 is a perspective view with portions cut away of a jaw arrangement in a microbend sensor with some form of overstress protection;</li><li>Figure 4 is a side elevation of the jaw arrangement shown in Figure 3, showing an overload condition;</li><li>Figure 5 is a side elevation of a jaw arrangement for a microbend sensor according to the invention; and</li><li>Figure 6 is a view similar to Figure 5 showing the jaw arrangement of Figure 5 in an overload condition under which condition the optical fibre is still not overstressed.</li></ul>

Figure 1 shows a microbend sensor used to sense the passage of vortices 21 in a fluid flow 100 on one side of a sensor housing 9 for the sensor, having a sensor housing flange 22 for isolating the sensor from the fluid flow 100.

A sensor beam 10 has an upper portion 10ª which extends upwardly into the sensor housing 9, and a lower portion 10<u style="single">b</u> which extends from the sensor housing flange 22 into the fluid flow 100. A pressure boundary means, for example in the form of a flexible diaphragm 23 is connected to the sensor housing 9 and isolates a sensor space in the sensor housing 9 from the fluid flow 100 on the opposite side of the flange 22.

A sensor assembly is mounted in the sensor space of the sensor housing 9. It comprises a mounting bracket 1 which has an upper flange portion that is fixed to the housing 9.

The mounting bracket 1 has a part 1ª that forms a frame for holding a sensor assembly. the sensor assembly comprises a first microbend jaw 2 that is attached to the frame 1ª by resilient means such as a spring. A second microbend jaw 3 is held to the first jaw 2 with an optical fibre 5 located between the first and second jaws 2 and 3. The optical fibre 5, which may be in the form of a cable, terminates in connectors 6 which are attached to the mounting bracket 1. The connectors 6 are used for coupling the optical fibre 5 to circuitry (not shown) for analyzing light passing through the optical fibre 5. The optical fibre 5 is supported and positioned by the mounting bracket 1. The second jaw 3 is held fast to the upper portion 10ª of the sensor beam 10 by bolts 13.

When assembled, the second jaw 3 is rigidly held with respect to the sensor beam 10 which serves as a mechanical input to the sensor assembly.

When the vortices 21 in the fluid flow 100 pass the lower portion 10<u style="single">b</u> of the sensor beam 10, the sensor beam 10 is caused to pivot about the diaphragm 23. This pivotal movement is transferred to the second jaw 3 which, in co-operation with the first jaw 2, bends and releases the optical fibre 5 and thereby modulates light passing therethrough. These modulations can be detected and measured and correspond to the passage of the vortices 21.

An adjustment screw 32 is threaded into the sensor housing 9 and can be used to adjust the position of the first jaw 2 to provide calibration adjustment for the sensor assembly.

Figure 2 is a side elevation of the first and second jaws 2 and 3 with the optical fibre 5 therebetween. The corrugations are in simple zig-zag form with the projections of the corrugations of one jaw opposing valleys of the corrugations of the other jaw. If the jaws 2 and 3 of Figure 2 are overloaded when pushed in a direction towards each other, they may bend the optical fibre 5 into a bend with a smaller radius than the fibre can accommodate. This overstresses the optical fibre and leads to excessive wear or damage.

Figure 3 shows an arrangement where jaws 2ʹ and 3ʹ are provided with corner projections 2ª and 3ª. As shown in Figure 4, when the jaws 2ʹ, 3ʹ are loaded they 2ʹ, 3ʹ can move together only to the extent permitted by the corner projections 2ª, 3ª. This limits the amount of bending of the optical fibre 5.

The jaws 2ʹ and 3ʹ with their corner projections 2ª and 3ª are difficult and complicated to manufacture and and require close tolerances to avoid overbending of the optical fibre 5.

An embodiment of jaws according to the invention is shown in Figures 5 and 6. Each jaw of jaws 2ʺ, 3ʺ has a corrugated portion made up of flat areas 2<u style="single">b</u>, 3<u style="single">b</u> which are separated by projections 2<u style="single">c</u>, 3<u style="single">c</u>. Each projection 2<u style="single">c</u>, 3<u style="single">c</u> is positioned to oppose one of the flat areas 2<u style="single">b</u>, 3<u style="single">b</u> of the opposing jaw and the optical fibre 5 is engaged by the projections 2<u style="single">c</u>, 3<u style="single">c</u>.

Figure 5 shows the normal modulating position, with the jaws 2ʺ, 3ʺ being movable together by a maximum amount limited to the height of the projections 2<u style="single">c</u> or 3<u style="single">c</u>.

Figure 6 shows an overload condition where the projections 3<u style="single">c</u> of the jaw 3ʺ, and the projections 2<u style="single">c</u> of the jaw 2ʺ have pressed bends in the optical fibre 5 up against flat areas 2<u style="single">b</u> and 3<u style="single">b</u> respectively. Thus each section of the optical fibre 5 can be bent only to a selected minimum radius, which is determined by the height of the projections 2<u style="single">c</u>, 3<u style="single">c</u>, the spacing between the projections 2<u style="single">c</u>, 3<u style="single">c</u>, that is to say the period of the corrugations, and the diameter of the optical fibre 5.

Each flat area 2<u style="single">b</u>, 3<u style="single">b</u> lies in a single plane in the respective jaw, which plane extends perpendicularly to the relative displacement direction of the jaws 2ʺ, 3ʺ.

Different corrugation patterns can also be used for the jaws. For example, the flat surfaces between the projections may be replaced by slightly concave surfaces. This can produce line contact between the optical fibre and the jaw in order to lower the stresses on the optical fibre during overload conditions. The surfaces of the jaws may also be made of a relatively soft material, perhaps even an elastic material, compared to the remainder of the jaw, in order to reduce the contact stresses as well as to reduce stresses due to impact. For the same reason the optical fibre itself may be coated, for example with aluminum. Another possibility would be to use flat surfaces on only one of the jaws thus enabling the second jaw to be made less expensively.