Highly simplified lateral flow-based nucleic acid sample preparation and passive fluid flow control

CA 02723536 2016-01-18

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

HIGHLY SIMPLIFIED LATERAL FLOW-BASED NUCLEIC ACID SAMPLE

PREPARATION AND PASSIVE FLUID FLOW CONTROL

RELATED APPLICATIONS io This application claims priority to United States Provisional Application No. 61/126,645 filed May 5, 2008.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The diverse nature of biological sample matrices present a need for robust yet general front-end sample processing methods that enable the collection of trace analytes even when present in complex mixtures of non-probative sample constituents [5], These challenges are often compounded by the presence of materials confounding to effective immunological or molecular analytical techniques. For example, samples derived from human tissue are likely to contain complex polysaccharides, hemoglobin, iron and other substances known to be inhibitory to DNA polymerases employed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Similarly, environmental samples or trace samples contaminated with environmental constituents, such as soil or plant material, can also contain organic materials, such as humic acids, that are strongly inhibitory to PCR and other enzymatic reactions critical to thorough nucleic acid analysis.

Although reliable nucleic acid isolation methods applicable to diverse biological samples have been reported for both DNA and RNA [5-11], such methods are labor intensive, dependent upon laboratory instrumentation and require hours to

CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 complete resulting in limited sample throughput and significant sample backlogs [12]. Down-stream enzymatic manipulations, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), can be adversely impacted by the presence of matrix constituents inhibitory to enzymatic activity rendering reliable sample preparation indispensible [5], Hemoglobin, iron and complex polysaccharides are commonly encountered in biological samples while additional inhibitory compounds such as humic acids often accompany environmentally collected samples containing soil, plant material or decaying mater [13-15]. Additionally, the trace nature of many analytes in diagnostic and forensic samples as well as the abundance of closely related but non-probative constituents contribute significantly to analytical challenges [16-20].

Lateral flow immuno-chromatography is well established and has been used for the detection of proteins and small molecules for many years [21, 22], Indeed, immuno-capture during lateral flow is the basis for rapid hand-held immunoassays that have found widespread use in the point-of-care (e.g. group A Streptococcal antigen) and in the home (e.g. pregnancy tests). While these assays make use of immuno-capture during lateral flow as a detection end-point, we propose the use of the same principle as a means of attaining rapid and efficient immuno-capture as a first step in a sample preparation strategy designed to enable the recovery of scarce targets (cells, viruses, spores) from mixed samples. Once captured in the stationary phase, these targets can then be subjected to further processing for nucleic acid isolation or collected for other analyses.

Nucleic acid-based assays for pathogen detection and identification offer sensitivity, specificity and resolution. These characteristics render nucleic acid analysis a powerful diagnostic and forensic technique. Nonetheless, many technologies for nucleic acid preparation have focused on isolation from relatively abundant samples such as clinical blood specimens. Many applications, however, often must address the need to isolate and identify trace constituents in complex mixed samples of diverse origin. In contrast to DNA-based assays, immunoassays have found widespread acceptance in low cost, easily used formats, perhaps

-2CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 most notable of which is the chromatographic lateral flow immunoassay [23], Lateral flow assays, also known as hand-held assays or dipstick assays, are used for a broad range of applications where rapid antigen detection is required in an easily used, low cost format. Lateral flow immunoassays have been successfully employed for pathogen identification, diagnostics, and environmental and agriculture surveillance [4], Several chromatographic lateral flow assays have been described for the detection of nucleic acid sequences using a variety of detection techniques [24-28]. Early work made use of cumbersome enzymatic detection strategies that relied on time consuming manipulations of dipsticks following introduction of the sample [25, 26] and detection schemes poorly suited for multiplexed applications [24, 27].

More recently described, the Lateral Flow Microarray (LFM) is a miniaturized lateral flow-based method for multiplexed nucleic acid detection [1], The approach makes use of DNA microarray-like patterning of a small lateral flow chromatography strip allowing multiple nucleic acid sequences to be detected in a single assay. The reduced surface area of the device confers several advantages over traditional lateral flow device form factors. Sample volumes are reduced to 10 pL resulting in reduced reagent consumption as well as reduced sample transport times. Moreover, hybridization times exhibited by the lateral flow microarray (LFM) are significantly reduced compared to standard glass substrate microarrays, which typically are allowed to hybridize with sample for several hours, as well as more complex microarray implementations that make use of microfluidic systems to facilitate more rapid hybridization [1, 29, 30], The convective fluid movement through the lateral flow substrate as well as the open-ended pores of the membrane substrates employed result in superior chromatography performance compared to bead-based column chromatography [31-34], These factors result in hybridization-based detection of < 250 amol of analyte in 2 minutes [1]. LFM is further described in United States Patent Application No. 11/894,910 and PCT International Application No. PCT/US2007/018537.

-3CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

The LFM platform has been used to develop a rapid assay for Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax, and has been shown to detect RNA from as few as 2-3 B. anthracis cells when present in a complex nucleic acid background consisting of 1 pg of total human RNA [1], The reported LFM approach made use of standard laboratory methods for RNA isolation and an isothermal RNA amplification scheme known as nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) [35-37], Perhaps most significantly, the miniaturization of lateral flow exemplified by the LFM, offers a physical configuration amenable to integration with fluidic or microfluidic systems for sample preparation support.

Integration of LFM-based protein and nucleic acid detection with simplified sample processing methods would offer several potential advantages for processing and screening of a broad range of sample types, and is desirable. Similarly, more robust sample preparation methods applicable to trace and/or dilute analytes would greatly facilitate nucleic acid amplification and detection in point of care and field deployed assays.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides highly simplified lateral flow chromatographic nucleic acid sample preparation methods, devices, and integrated systems for the efficient concentration of trace samples and the removal of nucleic acid amplification inhibitors. The invention makes use of LFM technology and passive fluid flow control systems, enabling a combination of (a) rapid immuno-affinity capture of analytes, including eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, viruses and plant cells and material, and (b) hybridization-based affinity capture of specific DNA or RNA sequences to be concentrated and washed free of contaminating proteins and other matrix derived constituents after cell/virus lysis. The invention also provides means for removing inhibitors of nucleic acid amplification reactions (i.e., PCR) within the context of a lateral flow device.

-4CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

The invention also provides lateral flow structures for passively controlling the flow of different and multiple solutions used in and the reaction sequences of a lateral flow assay. In one embodiment, at least the sample receiving zone of the LFSP device comprises a geometrically-defined absorbent material capable of supporting fluid wicking and the passive control of at least one fluid flow therein, such as nitrocellulose. In one embodiment, the invention provides a device comprising a lateral flow matrix which defines a flow path and which comprises a geometrically-defined absorbent material capable of supporting fluid wicking and the passive control of at least one fluid flow therein. In other embodiments described herein, a geometrically-defined nitrocellulose strip has a configuration essentially as shown in FIGS. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 14A.

The devices and systems of the invention are easily fabricated and use lateral capillary flow chromatographic substrates as a support for efficient low volume affinity purification of nucleic acids from biological samples. The invention’s approach to sample preparation enables highly efficient capture of trace analytes at spatially defined regions in a lateral flow sample preparation (LFSP) device. This results in a high local concentration of target analyte immobilized on the substrate, thus greatly facilitating extensive washing and additional manipulations including amplification with no user intervention or additional sample handling. These features, together with their compatibility with established molecular analytical techniques such as real-time PCR, MLVA, genotyping and other nucleic acid-based methods, render lateral flow sample concentration and processing an attractive means of obtaining suitable nucleic acids for environmental surveillance, disease diagnostics and bioforensic investigations.

In one embodiment, a LFSP device comprises a lateral flow matrix which defines a flow path and which comprises in series the following elements: (a) a sample receiving zone for receiving an aliquot of a fluid sample; and (b) an immunocapture zone in lateral flow contact with said sample receiving zone, which contains immobilized antibody reactive with a ligand present on a biological particle or cell of interest. Another embodiment further comprises, in series: (c) a

-5CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059 PCT/US2009/002809 lysis zone, in lateral flow contact with said immuno-capture zone, wherein lysis of the biological particle or cell of interest is achieved, thereby liberating nucleic acid therefrom. In still another embodiment, a LFSP device further comprises, in series: (d) one or more assay zones, in lateral flow contact with the lysis zone, which together form the nucleic acid and labeling constituents for a sandwich nucleic acid hybridization assay. In yet another embodiment, a LFSP device further comprises a nucleic acid amplification zone downstream of and in lateral flow contact with the lysis zone, and upstream and in lateral flow contact with the assay zone(s). This aspect of the invention is further described by way of the Examples, infra.

LFSP devices of the invention may also incorporate the invention’s methods for capturing and reducing inhibitors of nucleic acid amplification reactions, such as humic acid, using polyvinylpyrrolidone treated elements of the lateral flow device. Thus, referring to the above embodiments, a further embodiment of a LFSP device further comprises a pre-treatment zone comprising polyvinylpyrrolidone, in lateral flow contact with the element or elements of the device to which it is adjacent. For example, a treatment zone may be placed upstream of and in lateral flow contact with the immuno-capture zone, and downstream and in lateral flow contact with the sample zone. In related embodiments, substances other then or in addition to polyvinylpyrrolidone may be incorporated into the pretreatment zone in order to capture or reduce unwanted inhibitors or other contaminants from the sample matrix prior to amplification and/or assay. This aspect of the invention is described further in the Examples, infra.

LFSP devices of the invention may also incorporate the invention’s passive fluid control methods and systems. Briefly, passive solution or buffer flow control is achieved by cutting lateral flow membranes (e.g., nitrocellulose membranes) or other bibulous material, such as chromatography paper capable of supporting capillary flow/fluid wicking, into distinct geometries, such that individual flow paths, of varying lengths and/or widths, are defined for each of the buffers to be employed in an assay conducted using the device, yet are integrated within a

-6CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059 PCT/US2009/002809 single membrane. This aspect of the invention is described further in the Examples, infra.

LFSP devices of the invention may be used in any LF format, but may be particularly suited to use with LFM methods, devices and systems. Fully integrated, sample-to-answer assay devices comprising LFSP integrated with LFM are envisioned.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1. Lateral flow microarrays (LFMs) were challenged with NASBA reactions programmed with crude lysate from the indicated number of E. coli cells. Positive hybridization controls mark each row of spots on the LFM (column of five spots on the left side of the LFMs) and a set of duplicate spots indicate positive detection of E. coli (second row from the bottom, right side). “Negative” is a no template control. “Positive” contains 6 ng of E. coli RNA isolated using a Qiagen RNeasy kit. As few as 2000 cells could be detected using a crude lysate prepared by heating cells in cells-to-cDNA buffer (Ambion). See Example 1, infra.

FIG. 2. Lateral flow lateral flow facilitated immuno-capture. (A) Agdia TMV immuno-assay strips were run using 200 pL of the indicated dilution of dried cure tobacco leaf extract (DCTLE) in SEB1 extract buffer (Agdia, Inc.). DCTLE was generated by crushing 100 mg of dried cured tobacco leaf in 3 ml SEB1 extract buffer (Agdia, Inc.) in a plastic bag containing an abrasive mesh (Agdia, Inc.). Dilutions of 1:200 and greater were negative by immuno-assay. (B) Real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was used to examine regions below, at and above the TMV capture zone (CZ). 200 pL of undiluted extract was subjected to lateral flow and subsequent real-time RT-PCR of strip regions below, at and above the capture zone. A strip region from below the CZ revealed little or no detectable amplification with a cycle threshold (Ct) value of 29.7. A sample taken from the CZ generated a strongly positive signal for TMV with a Ct value of 26.3.

-7CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

A region above the capture zone also resulted in positive detection with a Ct value of 27.1. Thus, neat extract generated clearly positive PCR reactions only at and above the CZ while the region below the CZ inhibited PCR amplification. These data demonstrate that simple lateral flow immuno-capture without washes or further manipulation can alleviate PCR inhibition both through concentration of target particles and through physical sequestration of inhibitory matrix constituents. Significantly, the region above the CZ in the neat extract generates a positive PCR reaction apparently as a result of viral particle bleed-through from the CZ and an apparent concomitant depletion of inhibitors. (C) Real-time reversetranscriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was used to examine regions below, at and above the TMV capture zone (CZ) of TMV immuno-assay test strips following challenge with 200 pL of a 1:2000 dilution of DCTLE in sample buffer. A strip region from below the CZ revealed only weak amplification suggesting at this dilution inhibitors became sufficiently dilute to allow some amplification to take place (Ct = 28.9). A sample taken from the CZ generated a strongly positive signal for TMV with a Ct value of 22.4 suggesting that the combined effect of inhibitor dilution and immunocapture mediated virus concentration conspire to enable more robust amplification relative to neat extract experiments (compare with part A). A region above the capture zone also resulted in positive detection with a Ct value of 28.0.

FIG 3. PVP sample pads alleviate PCR inhibition resulting from exogenously added humic acid. DCTLE was generated as for FIG 2. 200 pL aliquots of extract were spiked with 0, 12, 25 ng of humic acid and subjected to lateral flow immunocapture of TMV using either a standard sample pad (Untreated Pad) or a sample pad treated with 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone (molecular weight 360,000) (PVP Samp Pad). Capture zones were collected and subjected to RT-PCR. Although 12 ng and 25 ng humic acid supplemented extracts failed to generate detectable PCR products following TMV capture using lateral flow strips with untreated sample pads, all samples exhibited detectable PCR products when subjected to immunocapture using PVP treated sample pads. Interestingly, 0, 12 and 25 ng humic acid samples run on PVP treated sample pads exhibited improved PCR amplification relative to 0 ng controls processed with the untreated pads. Lane labeled “RNA” is

-8CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 a positive control making use of total tobacco RNA preparations made using RNeasy (Qiagen).

FIG. 4. Passive buffer flow control over a prototype lateral flow substrate: (A) Sample (purple) and wash buffer (pink) have been introduced to the device but are not yet visible on the substrate. (B) Sample solution reaches the capture zone of the device (located at the top of the frame). (C) Sample continues to flow over the capture zone as wash buffer migrates, by capillary flow through a path longer and more narrow than used for the sample path, to the main strip junction. (D) As sample is exhausted, wash buffer begins to displace sample buffer. (E) Sample has now completely traversed the capture zone and wash buffer begins to flood the capture zone. (F) Within 5 minutes wash buffer has completely replaced sample buffer.

FIG. 5. Examples of buffer exchange structures which can be cut using a vinyl cutter or laser cutter from absorbant materials such as nitrocellulose or chromatrography paper. The depicted structures support a system making use of two fluids. (A) Two fluid flow channels support a buffer exchange or reagent introduction. Sample may be introduced by employing a fluidic device such as described in Example 8. The central tab descends into a reservoir chamber to accomodate uptake of the primary solution. A second solution is introduced via the left most absorbant region of the structure. A larger volume of solution in the second reservoir assures that the second fluid replaces the first in the downstream regions of the substrate. (B) An example of a geometry used to accomodate circular punches of affinity matrices for nucleic acid or protein capture. (C) An example of a geometry with an extended second fluid path allowing the supporing fluidic system to accomodate larger fluid volumes.

FIG. 6. Examples of buffer exchange structures which can be cut using a vinyl cutter or laser cutter from absorbant materials such as nitrocellulose or chromatrography paper. The depicted structures support a system making use of three fluids. (A) A structure with three fluid input pads. The right most pad is used

-9CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 for sample application, the middle for a first buffer exchange e.g. a staining or wash buffer and the left most pad a final buffer exchange to accomodate, for example, a wash buffer or amplfication reagent. This structure was been employed for immuno-assays making use of colloidal gold conjugated antibody as the first exchange buffer arid a wash to reduce background as a second exchange buffer in a compact fluidic system (see also FIG. 14). (B) A structure with three fluid input tabs spaced to allow introduction to solutions in a 96 well plate. (C) A structure with three fluid inputs suitable for integration with simple polycarbonate fluidic system.

FIG. 7. Laser ablation of the nitrocellulose layer of backed nitrocellulose can be used to generate buffer exchange structures similar to those fabricated by cutting methods. (A) A pattern used for generating a two fluid input exchanger by means of ablation. (B) Another of example of a two solution exchanger pattern. (C) Backed nitrocellulose (HF-135, Millipore, Inc.) was laminated, using a double-side adhesive tape, to polycabonate sheet and subject to laser ablation using the pattern shown in part (B).

FIG. 8. Passive buffer flow control over a refined microfluidic nitrocellulose membrane substrate. (A) To demonstrate the utility of microfluidic nitrocellulose structures for accomplishing passive yet rapid and complete buffer exchanges, buffers carrying easily visualized dyes representing sample (blue), lysis buffer (red) and amplification buffer (yellow) were introduced to the device. (B) Sample flows over the immuno-capture zone through a wide membrane path, displacing lysis and amplification buffer to the membrane region proximal to the substrate walls until sample flow is exhausted. (C) As sample is exhausted, lysis buffer invades the immuno-capture zone disrupting captured particles and liberating nucleic acids for hybridization-based capture on LNA probes immobilized at the down-stream “LNA-Capture Zone” (indicated in part A). (D) Following exhaustion of the lysis buffer, buffer compatible with NASBA amplification washes the LNAcapture zone removing residual lysis buffer and facilitating hybridization of primers. Within 3 minutes three buffer exchanges are accomplished using 10 pL

-10CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 sample, lysis and amplification buffer volumes. The calculated bed volume of immuno- and LNA-capture zones is approximately 250 nL, thus each buffer exchange washes the capture zones with approximately 40 bed volumes. Further fluid flow modulation could be realized using additional flow paths of varying lengths and widths to allow further buffer washes and exchanges. Similarly, modulating the viscosity of the buffers could be used to further refine such assay parameters as incubation times in lysis buffer. Most significantly, device size can be altered to accommodate the processing of larger sample volumes. Ruler divisions at the right of each panel are 1 mm. (E) A breadboard three fluid buffer exchange system showing integration of buffer exchange nitrocellulose structure with an immuno-assay strip. This device was employed for immuno-capture and wash experiments described in Example 5.

FIG. 9. Passive buffer exchange structures designed for use with 384 well titer plates. (A) A three fluid exchanger that makes use of five wells of a 384 well titer plate. The central fluid input occupies one well while second and third fluids are placed in well pairs flanking the central axis of symmetry. This structure was employed for nucleic acid capture from guanidinium isothiocyanate lysates as described in Example 7. (B) Another example of a 384 well compatible buffer exchange structure. (C) The buffer exchange structure used for experiments described in Example 6.

FIG. 10. LFM detection of TMV following dilution of tobacco extract in SEB1 sample buffer. DCTLE (100 mg tobacco in 3 mL SEB1) was diluted into additional SEB1 as indicated. (A) 100 pL sample volumes were subjected to lateral flow immuno-capture and passive buffer exchange was used to rinse residual SEB1 from the nitrocellulose matrix using 25 pL of H2O (No Wash). Capture zones were harvested and subjected to NASBA amplification and LFM mediated colorimetric detection. Neat tobacco extract under these conditions generated a false negative LFM result due to the high concentration of inhibitors in the sample. Dilutions of 1:2000 to 1:8000 sufficiently reduced the concentration of inhibitor to allow detection under these conditions. 1:16,000 dilution did not generate a

-11 CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 detectable LFM signal presumably due to low viral titer together with inhibition resulting from residual SEB1 buffer in the chromatography matrix. A no template negative control (NTC) is shown. TMV-2 capture probes provided the most sensitive detection of TMV derived amplicon. (B) 100 pl_ sample volumes were subjected to lateral flow immuno-capture and passive buffer exchange was used to wash captured virus with 50 μΙ_ NME buffer (50 mM MOPS, pH 7, 0.5M NaCI, 15% ethanol) and to rinse residual buffer from the nitrocellulose matrix with a final rinse of 25 μΙ_ of H2O. Capture zones were harvested and subjected to NASBA amplification and LFM mediated colorimetric detection. Neat tobacco extract under these conditions generated a robust positive result by LFM. Dilutions of 1:2000 to 1:16,000 were also positive under these conditions. The increased detection limit relative to the no wash treatment presented in part A is likely a result of the more complete removal of residual SEB1 buffer from the nitrocellulose substrate. Some SEB1 mediated inhibition has been noted in other studies. A no template negative control (NTC) is shown.

FIG. 11. Real-time RT-PCR of immuno-captured and passive buffer exchange washed TMV. Soil extracts spiked with DCTLE at a final dilution of 1:2000 or 1:4000 were subjected to immuno-capture and wash using TMV immuno-assay strips modified to carry a buffer exchange nitrocellulose structure designed to accommodate sample, wash buffer, and a final H2O rinse in a 384 well plate format (see FIG. 8E and FIG. 9C). Soil extracts were generated using 3g of soil in 30 mL of SEB1 extract buffer. Sample volume was 100 pL. Washes were conducted using 50 pL of NME buffer and were followed by a 25 pL H2O equilibration. Soil RNA isolated using a Qiagen RNeasy kit was included as a negative control. Without the wash step, but with the 25 pL H2O rinse, 1:2000 and 1:4000 dilutions generated high Ct values of 28.2 and 28.3 respectively. Inclusion of a 75 pL NME buffer wash generated positive detection of TMV with 1:2000 sample exhibiting a Ct value of 26.2 and 1:4000 samples a Ct of 27.2.

FIG. 12. Alleviation of PCR inhibition following passive buffer exchange washes of TMV immuno-captured from a highly inhibitory soil extract. Soil extract was spiked

-12CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 with DCTLE to give a final dilution of 1:2000. The volume of sample was 100 pL while NME washes were 50 pL and the final H2O rinse was 25 uL. The final H2O equilibration reduced the potential for carry-over of residual wash buffer into subsequent PCR reactions. Washes using 50 pL of water followed by a 25 pL water rinse (labeled as 75 pL H2O) generated a faint PCR product The use of NME wash buffer generated robust PCR amplification (NME). Washes with RLT, a Qiagen guanidinium-based lysis buffer, failed to generate detectable PCR amplicon (RLT). Eliminating the 50 pL wash but retaining the 25 pL rinse failed to sufficiently reduce inhibitor concentrations as evidenced by the lack of detectable amplicon in these samples (25 pL H2O). Soil extract sample without added TMV subjected to NME wash did not generate detectable TMV amplicon (Soil Only (NME wash)). SEB1 extraction buffer alone was assayed as a further negative control (SEB1). Additionally, negative control immuno-capture experiments were conducted using virgin soil extract and a NME buffer wash to further establish the absence of TMV from the soil used. The TMV lane is a positive control PCR reaction programmed with RNA isolated from tobacco using the Qiagen RNeasy kit.

FIG. 13. Real-time RT-PCR analysis of an RNA binding matrix challenged with dried cured tobacco leaf lysate generated by crushing 22 pg/pL of tobacco in RLT guanidinium isothiocyanate-based lysis buffer (Qiagen, Inc.). Tobacco leaf lysate was subjected to lateral flow mediated nucleic acid capture using a nitrocellulose buffer exchange device of the structure shown in FIG. 9A laminated to a 3 mm biopsy punch of an RNeasy column silica RNA binding matrix. 10 pL of RLT tobacco extract was used as the sample. 40 pL washes were conducted using NME buffer for all treatments except the no wash control. The initial NME wash was followed by 80 pL of NME (NME Only), or NaCI at concentrations varying from 0-1M as indicated. This aspect of the invention is described further in Example 7.

FIG. 14. Components of a self contained passive buffer exchange device. (A) An example three fluid exchanger suitable for integration with a simple supporting

-13CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 fluidic system. (B) Pattern for cutting polycarbonate to accommodate the fluid input tabs of the exchanger depicted in part (A). (C) fluid reservoir forming pattern for cutting polycarbonate sheet. Lamination to layer shown in part (B) carrying inserted exchange structure and to bottom layer shown in part (D) forms a integrated buffer exchange device allowing three solutions to be introduced via solution input ports. (D) Pattern for cutting bottom piece of device. (E) Scan of an assembled device shown here making use of 3MM chromatography paper for the buffer exchange component interfaced to an immuno-assay strip. In the depicted device, immuno-assays are conducted by introducing sample to the right most port, staining reagent (antibody conjugated colloidal gold) to the middle port and a final wash buffer to reduce background is added to the left most port. All solutions are added at the time of assay initiation. The size of the device is 25 mm x 75 mm, similar to a standard microscope slide.

FIG. 15. Artists rendering of one possible embodiment of the proposed integrated sample preparation device. The different subsystems of the device’s disposable component are depicted here as indicated. Fabricated from an inexpensive plastic housing and supported large pore nitrocellulose, the system will make use of capillary lateral flow and passive flow regulation to enable analyte affinity and hybridization-based capture as well as subsequent buffer exchanges required for lysis, washing and isothermal amplification by NASBA. 10% of the sample volume is interrogated immediately following sample addition using an immuno-assay LFM. Subsequent cell separation and lysis results in the liberation of cellular RNAs and stabilization by a guanidinium-based buffer. RNA sequences of interest are collected by hybridization in guanidinium buffer to LNA capture oligonucleotides. Any extracellular RNAs present in the sample should also be captured on the LNA oligonucleotides. Swab elution buffers may also be optimized for elution efficacy, immuno-assay compatibility and RNA stabilizing properties. For off-device analysis, a simple punch-out system could be incorporated to enable facile collection of cell separation or LNA capture zones (not shown).

-14CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

FIG. 16. Schematic of an alternative integrated device layout, which utilizes anion/cation exchange. A lateral flow strip accepts sample either in native buffer for immuno-affinity purification of cell and viral targets using an immobilized antibody ligand (Cell/Particle Capture) or as a lysate for affinity purification of nucleic acids by anion exchange (Anion Exchange Ligand). Depending on the input sample, a wash or lysis buffer is introduced at the time of protocol initiation to the Wash/Lysis zone where it flows from its absorbent pad (not shown) to the main substrate via a narrow nitrocellulose path reaching the main strip only after complete transport of the sample solution. Sample path treatments such as PVP, PVPP or cation exchange ligands may be included for amplification inhibitor removal. High ionic strength wash buffer elutes nucleic acids from the anion exchange ligand and provides an electrostatic environment supportive of efficient binding to the silica matrix. The resulting purified nucleic acids may be recovered by elution or collection of the silica matrix into a microcentrifuge tube carrying a frit where the nucleic acids may eluted using at least 2-bed volumes (> 0.8 pL) of low ionic strength buffer (water, TE, etc).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Unless otherwise defined, all terms of art, notations and other scientific terminology used herein are intended to have the meanings commonly understood by those of skill in the art to which this invention pertains, unless otherwise defined. In some cases, terms with commonly understood meanings are defined herein for clarity and/or for ready reference, and the inclusion of such definitions herein should not be construed to represent a substantial difference over what is generally understood in the art. The techniques and procedures described or referenced herein are generally well understood and commonly employed using conventional methodologies by those skilled in the art, such as, for example, the widely utilized molecular cloning methodologies described in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 3rd. edition (2001) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. and Current Protocols

-15CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059 PCT/US2009/002809 in Molecular Biology (Ausbel et al., eds., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2001. As appropriate, procedures involving the use of commercially available kits and reagents are generally carried out in accordance with manufacturer defined protocols and/or parameters unless otherwise noted.

LATERAL FLOW SAMPLE PREPARATION METHODS AND SYSTEMS

The invention provides highly simplified lateral flow chromatographic nucleic acid sample preparation methods, devices, and integrated systems for the efficient concentration of trace samples and the removal of nucleic acid amplification inhibitors. LFSP devices may consist of various elements of the invention disclosed herein, including lateral flow immuno-capture of biological particles or cells, lysis directly within the lateral flow matrix, the various elements constituting a sandwich hybridization assay, passive fluid/buffer control systems, and pretreatment with compositions capable of sequestering or reducing the activity of nucleic acid amplification inhibitors.

For example, a LFSP device may comprises a sample receiving zone for receiving an aliquot of a fluid sample, together with an immuno-capture zone in lateral flow contact with said sample receiving zone, which contains immobilized antibody reactive with a ligand present on a biological particle or cell of interest. Such a device may be used to capture a biological particle or cell of interest, and may also contain means for lysing the particle or cell, and for amplifying the nucleic acid liberated therefrom. The device may be coupled to or integrated with a lateral flow assay, such as a sandwich hybridization nucleic acid assay. In preferred embodiments, the LFSP devices are coupled to or integrated with an LFM device or assay. LFM devices and assays are described in United States Patent Application No. 11/894,192.

Immuno-capture zones may be prepared, for example, as follows. A lateral flow substrate (i.e., nitrocellulose) is treated such that a ligand (i.e., antibody) is immobilized to form an immuno-capture zone on the substrate. Specifically,

-16CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 antibody solutions are prepared in a physiological ionic strength buffer at a concentration found empirically to provide specific binding to the antigen (typically 0.01 mg/ml to 1 mg/ml). Antibody deposition onto a large pore nitrocellulose membrane can be accomplished by any of a number of means including but not limited to manual application, airbrush deposition, robotic fluid handling systems or similar methods that deposit controlled and reproducible volumes of ligand onto the substrate. Suitable substrates include HiFLow 135 (Millipore, Inc) and similar products available from a variety of commercial providers. Once deposited onto the substrate the ligand is immobilized by drying (in the case of proteinaceous ligands) and/or by UV irradiation at a dose of 5000 microjoules (in the case of nucleic acid/LNA immobilization).

The lateral flow immuno-capture aspect of the invention provides the capacity to concentrate target analytes from a wide range of dilute sample volumes. Once immobilized at the device’s capture zone, the targets may be detected as well as subsequently washed, lysed and any liberated nucleic acids amplified. Incorporating multiple capture zones, each carrying ligands to different analytes, would enable the separation and collection of multiple sample constituents of interest for subsequent on- or off- device analyses. The multiplex capacity of this approach would allow multiple proteinaceous and nucleic acid analytes to be collected (and if desired detected) rapidly with minimal user intervention, requiring less than 2 minutes to obtain immuno-assay results and less than 60 minutes to obtain sensitive sequence specific nucleic acid amplification and detection.

In a simplified sample preparation scheme, based upon immuno-capture and subsequent chemical and/or heat-mediated lysis, several factors must be considered including the removal of potential enzyme inhibitors and the impact of residual sample materials on amplification efficiency. Though crude cell lysate appropriately prepared can be used for NASBA (see Example 1, infra), applicant hypothesized that improved sensitivity could be achieved through the use of methods devised to further reduce cellular and matrix contaminants while simultaneously concentrating analyte particles from a complex mixture by means

-17CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 of immuno-affinity capture. This led to the development of a LFSP method and device which is capable of sequestering virus particles from a complex sample matrix, resulting in a cleansed viral sample that could be lysed to provide nucleic acids suitable for subsequent amplification without further purification. This aspect of the invention is described in more detail in Example 2, infra, wherein TMV particles were sequestered from crude macerated dried tobacco leaf by immuno-affinity chromatography within a nitrocellulose membrane context. The studies described in Example 2 demonstrate that lateral flow can be used to not only concentrate dilute analytes to a spatially defined capture zone but that regions of the device downstream of the capture zone are depleted with respect to the captured species. These data support the hypothesis that simple lateral flow immuno-assay methods can form the basis for a rapid and cost effective immunoaffinity purification system for separation and preparation of complex biological samples as well as the assertion that appropriately treated substrates can be used to deplete samples of unwanted constituents at downstream capture zones.

The samples utilized in the experiments described in Example 2 represent a very challenging matrix owing to the presence of complex polysaccharides, organic mater and other constituents strongly inhibitory to enzymatic manipulations, such as PCR and NASBA amplification, as well as potentially confounding nonprobative nucleic acids (plant derived DNA and RNA). Therefore, the results described in Example 2 demonstrate the utility of a preceding lateral flow mediated immuno-capture step in the analysis of complex biological samples wherein the target analyte is a minority species and PCR and NASBA inhibitors are present that preclude direct amplification of the target without preparatory processing. Further, the results obtained in the experiments of Example 2 support the hypothesis that simple lateral flow immuno-assay methods can form the basis for a rapid and cost effective immuno-affinity purification system for separation and preparation of complex biological samples as well as the assertion that appropriately treated substrates can be used to deplete samples of unwanted constituents at downstream capture zones.

-18CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

PASSIVE LF BUFFER EXCHANGE SYSTEMS

To eliminate the need for electronic control systems, valves, and other fluid flow control schemes that require moving parts, applicants have developed various nitrocellulose structures to mediate passive control of buffer and sample flow over a lateral flow substrate. Through the use of geometrically-defined flow paths in a single integrated lateral flow membrane, such as nitrocellulose or chromatography paper, the flow rate of multiple solutions/buffers may be passively controlled. In one methodology, described further by way of the examples presented in Example 4, infra, nitrocellulose membranes are cut to form individual flow paths for different solutions, which flow paths vary by length and or width of the membrane (see, for example, FIGS. 4-9). In addition to the geometric shapes exemplified by the prototype devices shown in FIGS. 7, 8 and 14, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many other shapes can achieve the desired modulation of the multiple solution flow paths required by the assay it is intended to facilitate. In addition, although this aspect of the invention is exemplified by single nitrocellulose membranes in which all flow paths are seamlessly integrated, other systems will also be apparent, including but not limited to those in which flow paths are modulated not only by membrane flow path length and/or width, but also by interrupting sequences of materials other than the membrane material, such as cellulose esters, glass fiber, polyethersulfone, cotton, dehydrated polyacrylamide, silica gel, and polyethylene glycols. It will be appreciated that defining precisely controlled fluid paths and reaction sequences will vary according to the assay type and complexity. However, based on the teachings provided herein, one will be able to empirically derive the necessary control for a specific assay with ordinary experimentation.

INTEGRATED SYSTEMS:

Also envisioned are fully integrated, sample-to-answer lateral flow assay devices that incorporate one or more elements of the present invention. Example integrated systems are schematically represented in FIGS. 15 and 16. For

-19CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 example, in one embodiment, a LFSP device is integrated with both immunoassay screening and NASBA amplification followed by a downstream lateral flow sandwich hybridization nucleic acid assay. A schematic representation of such a device is shown in FIG. 15.

Such devices may comprise a lateral flow compatible chromatography support, such as HiFlow 135 large pore supported nitrocellulose (Millipore). This substrate is patterned using a fluid deposition system such as a piezo-actuated picoliter deposition system (NanoPlotter 2.0, GeSim) to confer specific properties at desired locations in the sample flow. For example, regions up-stream of an immuno-capture zone will be treated to confer modifications capable of removing or reducing the activity of amplification inhibitors or other undesirable sample matrix contaminants. Antibodies to pathogens of interest are located such that target particles are captured from sample solutions during capillary lateral flow. Further, by incorporating passive fluid flow control, captured cells or viruses can be lysed to liberate nucleic acids for affinity capture and purification at downstream substrate zones. Some embodiments may be equipped with a heating element powered by a USB interface or internal or external power source or battery, to incubate sample in lysis buffer at an elevated temperature [49], Nucleic acids liberated during lysis then flow to down-stream affinity capture zones for immobilization, washing and collection. The capture zone of the device may incorporate PCR, RT-PCR, NASBA or isothermal nucleic acid amplification reactions.

To allow the incorporation of more stringent washing conditions without significant increases in protocol complexity, the invention also supplies an approach that exploits the increased stability of LNA duplexes [39]. In this scheme, the sample preparation device carries immobilized LNA oligonucleotides. These immobilized probes are predicted to allow sequence specific hybridization-mediated capture of target RNAs under the denaturing conditions imposed by a guanidinium-based lysis buffer. Prior work by others has shown that an LNA oligonucleotide can be used to capture, by hybridization, RNA molecules present in crude cell lysates

-20CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 containing 4M guanidinium [40], LNA capture probes will be designed to hybridize to regions near but not overlapping with NASBA amplification primer binding sites.

One advantage of a supported nitrocellulose system is the ease with which chemical modifications can be made to the membrane. Prior reports have detailed methods for covalent and adsorptive modification of nitrocellulose to introduce immobilized functional groups for both cation and anion exchange chromatography [17]. Treatments that result in an immobilized anion exchange ligand at a defined zone or component membrane of a multiple membrane system may also be included for nucleic acid binding and purification, including without limitation polyethyleneimine (PEI) as well as diethyl aminoethyl (DEAE) functional groups, both of which have been used for membrane based ion exchange chromatography [17], Additionally, regions up-stream of nucleic acid affinity ligand can be treated to reduce or preclude the transport of common nucleic acid sample contaminants. Such modifications could include, for example, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) [31-33], novel inhibitor sequestering agents (e.g. PIR, J. Dunbar, LANL, pers. comm.) and cation exchange ligands.

-21 CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059 PCT/US2009/002809

EXAMPLES

I

EXAMPLE 1 : NASBA AMPLIFICATION OF RNA FROM CRUDE BACTERIAL CELL LYSATES

In order to evaluate the feasibility of using crude lysates to supply template RNA for amplification, the efficacy of NASBA amplification from E. coli lysates was examined. Lysates were prepared by adding varying quantities of E. coli liquid culture to cells-to-cDNA buffer (Ambion) and heating to 75 °C for 10 minutes. This method was reported to generate suitable template for RT-PCR (reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction) from crude L. moncytogenes lysates [49]. Lysates were diluted 1:5 and 2 pL of the resulting material used in a 10 pL NASBA reaction.

A constitutively expressed mRNA, rpIV, was used as the NASBA target [50], NASBA P1 and P2 primer sequences were as follows:

EC-rplV-P1: 5’aattctaatacgactcactatagggagaaggCCATCGTTGTGTTCAGCGTTA-3’

[SEQ ID NO: 1] and

EC-rplV-P2: 5’-gatgca aggtcg cat atg agAACTATCGCTAAACATCGCCA-3’ [SEQ ID NO: 2],

Lower case characters in the P1 sequence denote the T7 RNA polymerase promoter sequence. Lower case characters in the P2 sequence represent the tag sequence used for hybridization sandwich assay mediated detection. The sequences used for rpIV capture and detection on LFMs were the capture probe:

rpIV-cap: 5’-CTGCTCAGAAGGTTCGCCTT-3’ [SEQ ID NO: 3] and the detection probe:

-22CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

UNI-det-5Tbio: 5’-TT-U-biotin-TTTT-U-biotin-TTTT-U-biotin-TTTTTTT gat gca agg teg cat atg ag -3’ [SEQ ID NO: 4],

NASBA reactions were allowed to proceed for 60 minutes at 41 °C after which 4 pL was removed and assayed for rpIV amplicon by LFM using colorimetric detection mediated by dyed polystyrene microspheres conjugated to streptavidin.

The results presented in FIG. 1 show the LFM membranes following exposure to NASBA reactions containing crude lysate from the indicated number of cells. As few as 2000 cells could be detected by LFM, following NASBA amplification, using crude whole cell lysate to supply template. This experiment demonstrates that a crude lysate prepared under denaturing conditions in the presence of guanidinium can be used successfully as NASBA template. Given that one proposed lateral flow method for sample preparation would allow a sequence specific capture of the target RNA and stringent washes in guanidinium buffer, it is likely that the detection limit of 2000 cells obtained with crude lysate can be significantly improved.

EXAMPLE 2: LATERAL FLOW CONCENTRATION OF ANALYTE AND

SUBSEQUENT AMPLIFICATION FROM TMV PARTICLES CONTAINED WITHIN LEAF TISSUE

In this Example, the utility of lateral flow facilitated immuno-capture as a means of concentrating analyte prior to nucleic acid isolation or amplification was investigated with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV).

FIG. 2A-C depicts the results of immuno-affinity capture and concentration of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) particles during lateral flow of 200 pL of crude macerated tobacco and subsequent amplification (reverse-transcriptase-PCR) reactions programmed with regions of the lateral flow substrate below (proximal to the sample pad), at and above (distal to the sample pad) the immuno-capture

-23CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 zone (as shown in FIG. 2A). The capture zone is greatly enriched in virus particles while the relative concentration of inhibitory constituents is reduced. The 1000-fold reduction of sample volume from 200 pL to 200 nL, based on the calculated bed volume of the capture zone, exhibited here will also facilitate subsequent washing to further reduce inhibitor concentrations.

These data demonstrate that lateral flow can be used to not only concentrate dilute analytes to a spatially defined capture zone but that regions of the device downstream of the capture zone are depleted with respect to the captured species. These data support applicant’s hypothesis that simple lateral flow immunoassay methods can form the basis for a rapid and cost effective immunoaffinity purification system for separation and preparation of complex biological samples, as well as the assertion that appropriately treated substrates can be used to deplete samples of unwanted constituents at downstream capture zones.

EXAMPLE 3: LATERAL FLOW REDUCTION OF AMPLIFICATION INHIBITORS USING POLYVINYLPYRROLIDONE

This Example shows that polyvinylpyrrolidone treated sample pads can deplete PCR inhibitors via lateral flow.

The observation, made during the course of applicant’s preliminary studies, that crude sample constituents inhibitory to PCR can be depleted during lateral flow, suggested that specific substrate treatments may further facilitate amplification of nucleic acids from captured target cells or particles. To test this hypothesis, absorbent sample pads were treated with a 10% solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (MW = 360,000) [31-33] and RT-PCR amplification of TMV concentrated from macerated leaf tissue following lateral flow immuno-capture (Example 2, supra) on devices carrying either PVP treated or untreated sample pads was evaluated.

-24CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

These reactions made use of previously reported primer sets for TMV detection [35], Neat tobacco extract added directly to RT-PCR reactions was negative for TMV without prior immuno-capture to deplete inhibitors. Consistent with this interpretation, 1:50 dilutions of extract were positive by PCR presumably due to lower inhibitor concentrations.

As shown in FIG. 3, PVP sample pads alleviated inhibition from exogenously added humic acid, a potent PCR inhibitor [9, 34], while untreated sample pads did not. Perhaps most significantly, the use of PVP treated sample pads resulted in significantly improved amplification relative to untreated sample pads even in the absence of exogenously added inhibitor. Although 12 ng and 25 ng humic acid supplemented extracts failed to generate detectable PCR products following TMV capture using lateral flow strips with untreated sample pads, all samples exhibited detectable PCR products when subjected to immuno-capture using PVP treated sample pads (FIG. 3). Interestingly, 0, 12 and 25 ng humic acid samples run on PVP treated sample pads exhibited improved PCR amplification relative to 0 ng controls processed with the untreated pads (FIG. 3).

EXAMPLE 4: GEOMETRIC ARCHITECTURES FOR PASSIVELY CONTROLLING MULTIPLE SOLUTION FLOWS IN LATERAL FLOW SYSTEMS

This Example shows prototypes of passive lateral flow buffer control systems utilizing attributes of geometrically-defined nitrocellulose strips to control the speed and volume of fluid flow. In order to rapidly generate prototypes of nitrocellulose or other adsorbent material-based devices, methods were developed for cutting miniaturized structures from sheets of absorbent material using either a vinyl cutter (Roland GX-24 CAMM-1) or a laser cutting/engraving system (VersaLaser VL-300 equipped with a 30W CO2 laser (Universal Laser Systems, Inc.)) (FIGS. 4-9). Additionally, it was found that laser ablation of nitrocellulose from backed nitrocellulose sheets allows the fabrication of planar nitrocellulose structures suitable for use as fluid flow control and buffer exchange

-25CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 components (FIG. 7). A number of different shaped nitrocellulose structures were evaluated for their utility in exchanging two (FIG. 4, FIG. 5 and FIG. 7) and three fluids (FIG. 6, 8 and 9) by means of passive capillary wicking in lateral flow mode.

Fluid flow control using the prototype device shown in FIG. 4. In this crude prototype, two different buffer solutions migrate at different rates by capillary flow through variable paths defined by differing geometric attributes cut into the nitrocellulose strips.

A more refined prototype device was fabricated using the vinyl cutter, and is shown in FIG. 8A-D. By varying the length and widths of the nitrocellulose paths defined for different solutions, this device was able to manage the temporal control of three different solutions relative to defined reaction zones on the device. As shown in FIG. 8, sample, lysis buffer, and amplification buffer are introduced to the device (FIG. 8A). Sample buffer flows over the immuno-capture zone through a wide membrane path, displacing the lysis and amplification buffers to the membrane region proximal to the substrate walls until sample flow is exhausted (FIG. 8B). As sample is exhausted, lysis buffer invades the immuno-capture zone disrupting captured particles and liberating nucleic acids for hybridization-based capture on LNA probes immobilized at the down-stream “LNA-Capture Zone” (indicated in FIG. 8A). Following exhaustion of the lysis buffer, buffer compatible with NASBA amplification washes the LNA-capture zone removing residual lysis buffer and facilitating hybridization of primers. Within 3 minutes, three buffer exchanges are accomplished using 10 pl_ sample, lysis and amplification buffer volumes. The calculated bed volume of immuno- and LNA-capture zones is approximately 250 nL, thus each buffer exchange washes the capture zones with approximately 40 bed volumes. Further fluid flow modulation could be realized using additional flow paths of varying lengths and widths to allow further buffer washes and exchanges. Similarly, modulating the viscosity of the buffers could be used to further refine such assay parameters as incubation times in lysis buffer. Most significantly, device size can be altered to accommodate the processing of larger sample volumes. Ruler divisions at the right of each panel are 1 mm.

-26CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

EXAMPLES: GEOMETRIC ARCHITECTURES FOR PASSIVELY WASHING IMMUNOCAPTURED TARGETS TO INCREASE AMPLIFICATION EFFICIENCY

Results obtained from experiments employing real-time detection of RT-PCR amplicons as well as LFM detection of NASBA reaction products indicated that residual inhibitory constituents of the sample matrix remain associated with immuno-captured virus or remain in the included bed volume of the chromatography substrate. These data suggested that a buffer wash following lateral flow immuno-capture may provide a simple but effective means of increasing amplification efficacy from complex sample matrices. To test this hypothesis, lateral flow strips were subjected to a buffer wash prior to capture zone harvest and nucleic acid amplification by laminating a nitrocellulose structure designed to mediate passive buffer exchange onto a nitrocellulose immunoassay strip carrying an anti-TMV antibody at the capture zone line and a control antibody capable of binding colloidal gold conjugated detection antibody at a control line.

To minimize the level of user intervention required to accomplish buffer washes of lateral flow substrates, lateral flow strips were laminated to backed nitrocellulose cut into shapes designed to accomplish passive buffer exchange. These devices allowed rapid exchange of sample with wash buffer and a final equilibration in ultrapure H2O prior to PCR to reduce the potential impact of residual wash buffer on PCR performance. The device used is shown in FIG. 8E. A 100 pL sample volume was used. Wash buffer volume was 50 pL followed by a final rinse using 25 pL of H₂O to remove residual buffer constituents. Sample, wash buffer and H2O were added to the corresponding wells of a 384 well plate at the time of assay initiation. Following completion of capillary transport, capture zones were harvested and subjected to analysis by real-time RT-PCR.

To identify buffers with a composition compatible with immuno-affinity immobilization of virus at the capture zone of lateral flow strips, the effect of

-27CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 various wash buffers on TMV immuno-strip capture zone signals generated using neat tobacco extract were evaluated. These studies revealed no visually detectable elution of sequestered gold particles from the capture zone following capillary wicking of 200 pL of an ethanol containing wash buffer, referred to here as NME (0.5M NaCI, 50 mM MOPS pH 7.0, 15% ethanol). In contrast to the effect of NME on capture zone signals, the guanidinium isothiocyanate containing buffer RLT (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) rapidly cleared the capture zone of detection particles.

Using a 50 pL NME wash following challenge of TMV immuno-assay strips laminated to the passive buffer exchange structure with varying dilutions of DCTLE in SEB1, capture zones were harvested and subjected to NASBA amplification and amplicon detection by LFM. These studies revealed an alleviation of NASBA amplification inhibition previously observed in reactions programmed with capture zone material harvested from strips exposed to undiluted DCTLE (compare FIG. 10A with FIG. 10B). Additionally, the NME buffer wash resulted in detection of TMV at DCTLE dilutions of at least 1:16,000 suggesting that the more thorough removal of the SEB1 extract buffer employed for DCTLE dilutions from the chromatography substrate further increased amplification efficiency.

LFM detection of TMV amplicons made use of capture probes TMV-1 and TMV-2 immobilized on the LFM substrate:

TMV-1:

5’ TTATGCTATAACCACCCAGG 3’ [SEQ ID NO: 5]

TMV-2:

5’ TTATGCTATAACCACCCAGGACGCGATGAAAAACGTCTGGCAA 3’ [SEQ ID NO: 6]

-28CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 and a detection probe:

UNI-det-5Tbio:

5’-TT-U-biotin-TTTT-U-biotin-TTTT-U-biotin-TTTTTTT gat gca agg teg cat atg ag 3’ [SEQ ID NO: 7] visualized by streptavidin conjugated dyed polystyrene microsphere (Spherotech) capture.

NASBA amplification of TMV diagnostic sequence was accomplished using:

TMV-P1 : 5’ aat tet aat aeg act cac tat agg g aqa GAA AGO GGA CAG AAA CCC GCT Ga 3’ [SEQ ID NO: 8]

TMV-P2: 5’ gat gca agg teg cat atg ag GAC CTG ACA AAA ATG GAG AAG ATC T 3’ [SEQ ID NO: 9]

The TMV-P2 primer incorporates a tag sequence into the NASBA product that is capable of hybridizing to the UNI-det-5Tbio oligonucleotide to mediate detection.

EXAMPLE 6: USE OF PASSIVE BUFFER EXCHANGE TO DETECT TRACE VIRUS IN A COMPLEX AND INHIBITORY SAMPLE MATRIX

Studies making use of tobacco extract revealed that the high viral titer in these samples allows PCR-based detection of TMV to be accomplished by simply diluting extract to a sufficient extent that inhibitors in the crude lysate fall below a critical concentration. To better evaluate the utility of a lateral flow immunocapture step to render inhibitor laden samples containing low titers of target virus amenable to amplification, samples making use of soil extracts were devised to contain sufficient enzymatic inhibitor concentrations to completely abrogate PCR amplification of TMV diagnostic sequences in the absence of an intervening sample processing procedure. These samples allow an assessment of the impact of lateral flow immuno-capture on PCR-based detection schemes and provide an

-29CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 approach to evaluate the impact of a buffer wash on the level of amplification inhibition. To provide a challenging inhibitor laden sample, DCTLE was diluted 1:2000 or 1:4000, as indicted in FIG. 11, into a PCR inhibitory soil extract prepared using 3 g locally gathered soil measured into 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes and vortexed vigorously in 30 mL SEB 1 extraction buffer (Agdia, Inc.) and allowed to rotate overnight at room temperature. The resulting soil slurry was allowed to settle for 3 minutes prior to the collection of aliquots for RNA isolation, PCR testing for TMV or preparation of soil extracts spiked with DCTLE.

Capture zones were collected following completion of sample and wash buffer transport and introduced to reverse-transcriptase reactions followed by real-time PCR using 1 pL of the RT reaction as template. To characterize soil extracts, soil extract total RNA was isolated using Qiagen RNeasy protocols and assayed for TMV by real-time RT-PCR to confirm the matrix was negative for TMV. Additionally, DCTLE spiked soil derived sample matrix generated false negative real-time RT-PCR results using capture zones harvested from TMV assay strips challenged with 100 pL of soil extract containing either 1:2000 or 1:4000 DCTLE (FIG. 11). Passive capillary flow mediated wash of TMV assay strips challenged with soil extract containing tobacco extract at a final dilution of 1:2000 using 50 pL of NME buffer generated a positive real-time RT-PCR result (Ct = 26.2) (FIG. 11) as well as a clearly identifiable band in agarose gels (FIG. 12, NME). Washes with 50 pL of RLT buffer did not result in successful TMV detection by either RT-PCR and gel analysis (FIG. 12, RLT) or by real-time RT-PCR (not shown). Additionally, a more dilute solution of DCTLE in soil extract, 1:4000, also generated positive TMV detection by real-time RT-PCR (FIG. 11) with a Ct value of 27.2 when a 50 pL NME buffer wash was employed prior to capture zone harvest.

EXAMPLE 7: GEOMETRIC ARCHITECTURES FOR PASSIVELY WASHING NUCLEIC ACIDS BOUND TO AN AFFINITY MATRIX

To evaluate the capacity of the passive buffer exchange approach to allow nucleic acids to be directly captured from a guanidinium lysate, tobacco lysate was

-30CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 prepared by maceration of dried cured tobacco leaf in Qiagen RLT guanidinium isothiocyanate lysis buffer using 22 pg of tobacco per μΙ_ RLT. A device for lateral flow chromatography and buffer exchange was fabricated using a laser cutter (VersaLaser VL-300, 30W CO2 laser, Universal Laser Systems). The device was designed such that the input tails of the buffer exchange component were spaced at 4.5 mm intervals to allow sample and buffer to be absorbed from the wells of a 384 well plate. The distal end of the buffer exchanger was laminated to a 3 mm diameter punch taken from a Qiagen RNeasy column. This silica RNA binding matrix was used to evaluate the suitability of capillary lateral flow mediated buffer exchange to support viral RNA capture. Other materials, such as glass fiber filter material, may also be employed. Similarly, using other buffer systems, DEAE membranes could be incorporated into a similar system.

pL of RLT tobacco extract was used as the sample. 40 pL washes were conducted using NME buffer for all treatments except the no wash control followed by 80 pL of NME, or NaCI at concentrations varying from 0-1M as indicated in FIG. 13. These data show that the NME wash followed by a 0.5M NaCI wash provided the best amplification of the conditions tested. Samples that were not washed failed to generate detectable real-time RT-PCR products.

EXAMPLE 8: INTEGRATION OF PASSIVE BUFFER EXCHANGE GEOMETRIC ARCHITECTURES INTO A FLUIDIC SYSTEM TO SUPPORT FACILE TARGET ENRICHMENT AND WASHING PRIOR TO AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION

To incorporate the lateral flow capture and buffer exchange systems into a compact and self-contained housing, a supporting fluidic system was devised. The fluidic system was fabricated to accommodate a nitrocellulose or chromatography paper buffer exchanger such as that shown in FIG. 14A by cutting polycarbonate sheet using a laser cutter into the geometries shown in FIG. 14B-D. Appropriately cut polycarbonate sheet was laminated to form sample and buffer wells using UV cured adhesive or water proof double-sided tape (ACE double-sided carpet tape

-31 CA 02723536 2016-01-18

-3250106). The resulting devices allowed sample and wash buffers to be introduced at the time of assay initiation and supported sample chromatography and washing without further user intervention.

The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the embodiments disclosed herein, which are intended as single illustrations of individual aspects of the invention, and any which are io functionally equivalent are within the scope of the invention. Various modifications to the models and methods of the invention, in addition to those described herein, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description and teachings, and are similarly intended to fall within the scope of the invention.

CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

LITERATURE CITATIONS

1. Carter, D.J. and R.B. Cary, Lateral flow microarrays: a novel platform for rapid nucleic acid detection based on miniaturized lateral flow chromatography. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007. 35(10): p. e74.

2. Baeumner, A. J., Biosensors for environmental pollutants and food contaminants. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2003. 377(3): p. 434-445.

3. Pristoupil, T.I., Microchromatography and microelectrophoresis on nitrocellulose membranes. Chromatogr Rev, 1970. 12(2): p. 109-125.

4. Kohn, J., An immunochromatographic technique. Immunology, 1968. 15(6): p. 863-865.

5. Yang, S. and R.E. Rothman, PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis, 2004. 4(6): p. 337-348.

6. Koch, W. H., Technology platforms for pharmacogenomic diagnostic assays. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2004. 3(9): p. 749-761.

7. Mackay, I.M., Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2004. 10(3): p. 190-212.

8. Cirino, N.M., K.A. Musser, and C. Egan, Multiplex diagnostic platforms for detection of biothreat agents. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2004. 4(6): p. 841857.

9. Wilson, I.G., Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1997. 63(10): p. 3741-3751.

10. Akane, A., K. Matsubara, H. Nakamura, S. Takahashi, and K. Kimura, Identification of the heme compound copurified with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from bloodstains, a major inhibitor of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. J Forensic Sci, 1994. 39(2): p. 362-372.

11. Monteiro, L., D. Bonnemaison, A. Vekris, K.G. Petry, J. Bonnet, R. Vidal, J. Cabrita, and F. Megraud, Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model. J Clin Microbiol, 1997. 35(4): p. 995-998.

12. Wickenheiser, R.A., Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact. J Forensic Sci, 2002. 47(3): p. 442-450.

13. Elliott, K., D.S. Hill, C. Lambert, T.R. Burroughes, and P. Gill, Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscope slides. Forensic Sci Int, 2003. 137(1): p. 28-36.

14. Gill, P., Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J, 2001. 42(3): p. 229-232.

15. Gill, P., J. Whitaker, C. Flaxman, N. Brown, and J. Buckleton, An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int, 2000. 112(1): p. 17-40.

16. Jobling, M.A. and P. Gill, Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nat Rev Genet, 2004. 5(10): p. 739-751.

17. Lonnberg, M. and J. Carlsson, Chromatographic performance of a thin microporous bed of nitrocellulose. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl, 2001. 763(1-2): p. 107-120.

-33CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

18. Tennikov, T.B. and F. Svec, High-performance membrane chromatography: highly efficient separation method for proteins in ionexchange, hydrophobic interaction and reversed-phase modes. J. Chromatography, 1993. 646: p. 279-288.

19. Tennikova, T.B. and R. Freitag, An introduction to monolithic disks as stationary phases for high performance biochromatography. J. High Resol. Chromatogr., 2000. 23: p. 27-38.

20. Thommes, J. and M. Kula, Membrane Chromatography- An Integrative Concept in the Downstream Processing of Proteins. Biotechnol. Prog., 1995. 11: p. 357-367.

21. Peytavi, R., F.R. Raymond, D. Gagne, F.J. Picard, G. Jia, J. Zoval, M. Madou, K. Boissinot, M. Boissinot, L. Bissonnette, M. Ouellette, and M.G. Bergeron, Microfluidic device for rapid (<15 min) automated microarray hybridization. Clin Chem, 2005. 51(10): p. 1836-1844.

22. Wei, C.W., J.Y. Cheng, C.T. Huang, M.H. Yen, and T.H. Young, Using a microfluidic device for 1 microl DNA microarray hybridization in 500 s. Nucleic Acids Res, 2005. 33(8): p. e78.

23. Compton, J., Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Nature, 1991. 350(6313): p. 91-92.

24. Kievits, T., B. van Gemen, D. van Strijp, R. Schukkink, M. Dircks, H. Adriaanse, L. Malek, R. Sooknanan, and P. Lens, NASBA isothermal enzymatic in vitro nucleic acid amplification optimized for the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection. J Virol Methods, 1991. 35(3): p. 273-286.

25. Malek, L., R. Sooknanan, and J. Compton, Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Methods Mol Biol, 1994. 28: p. 253-260.

26. Wetzel, T., T. Candresse, G. Macquaire, M. Ravelonandro, and J. Dunez,

A highly sensitive immunocapture polymerase chain reaction method for plum pox potyvirus detection. J Virol Methods, 1992. 39(1-2): p. 27-37.

27. Leone, G., H.B. van Schijndel, B. van Gemen, and C.D. Schoen, Direct . detection of potato leafroll virus in potato tubers by immunocapture and the isothermal nucleic acid amplification method NASBA. J Virol Methods, 1997. 66(1): p. 19-27.

28. Romero, A., B. Blanco-Urgoiti, and F. Ponz, Amplification and cloning of a long RNA virus genome using immunocapture-long RT-PCR. J Virol Methods, 1997. 66(1): p. 159-163.

29. Chanteau, S., L. Rahalison, M. Ratsitorahina, Mahafaly, M. Rasolomaharo, P. Boisier, T. O'Brien, J. Aldrich, A. Keleher, C. Morgan, and J. Burans, Early diagnosis of bubonic plague using F1 antigen capture ELISA assay and rapid immunogold dipstick. Int J Med Microbiol, 2000. 290(3): p. 279283.

30. Fukuta, S., K. Ohishi, K. Yoshida, Y. Mizukami, A. Ishida, and M. Kanbe, Development of immunocapture reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the detection of tomato spotted wilt virus from chrysanthemum. J Virol Methods, 2004. 121(1): p. 49-55.

31. Young, C.C., R.L. Burghoff, L.G. Keim, V. Minak-Bernero, J.R. Lute, and S.M. Hinton, Polyvinylpyrrolidone-Agarose Gel Electrophoresis Purification of Polymerase Chain Reaction-Amplifiable DNA from Soils. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1993. 59(6): p. 1972-1974.

-34CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809

32. Koonjul, P.K., W.F. Brandt, J.M. Farrant, and G.G. Lindsey, Inclusion of polyvinylpyrrolidone in the polymerase chain reaction reverses the inhibitory effects of polyphenolic contamination of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res, 1999. 27(3): p. 915-916.

33. Berthelet, M., L.G. Whyte, and C.W. Greer, Rapid, direct extraction of DNA from soils for PCR analysis using polyvinylpolypyrrolidone spin columns. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 1996. 138(1): p. 17-22.

34. Tsai, Y.L. and B.H. Olson, Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1992. 58(7): p. 2292-2295.

35. Jacobi, V., G.D. Bachand, R.C. Hamelin, and J.D. Castello, Development of a multiplex immunocapture RT-PCR assay for detection and differentiation of tomato and tobacco mosaic tobamoviruses. J Virol Methods, 1998. 74(2): p. 167-178.

36. Sterne, M., The use of anthrax vaccines prepared from avirulent (uncapsulated) variants of Bacillus anthracis. Onderstepoort J Vet Sci Anim Ind, 1939. 13: p. 307-312.

37. Loens, K., K. Bergs, D. Ursi, H. Goossens, and M. leven, Evaluation of NucliSens easyMAG for automated nucleic acid extraction from various clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol, 2007. 45(2): p. 421-425.

38. Biagini, R.E., D.L. Sammons, J.P. Smith, B.A. Mackenzie, C.A. Striley, J.E. Snawder, S.A. Robertson, and C.P. Quinn, Rapid, sensitive, and specific lateral-flow immunochromatographic device to measure anti-anthrax protective antigen immunoglobulin g in serum and whole blood. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2006. 13(5): p. 541-546.

39. Singh, S.K., P. Nielsen, A. Koshkin, and J. Wengel, LNA (locked nucleic acids): Synthesis and high-affinity nucleic acid recognition. Chem. Commun., 1998. 4: p. 455-456.

40. Jacobsen, N., P.S. Nielsen, D.C. Jeffares, J. Eriksen, H. Ohlsson, P. Arctander, and S. Kauppinen, Direct isolation ofpoly(A)+ RNA from 4 M guanidine thiocyanate-lysed cell extracts using locked nucleic acid-oligo(T) capture. Nucleic Acids Res, 2004. 32(7): p. e64.

41. Lockley, A.K., C.G. Jones, J.S. Bruce, S.J. Franklin, and R.G. Bardsley, Colorimetric detection of immobilised PCR products generated on a solid support. Nucleic Acids Res, 1997. 25(6): p. 1313-1314.

42. Pemov, A., H. Modi, D.P. Chandler, and S. Bavykin, DNA analysis with multiplex microarray-enhanced PCR. Nucleic Acids Res, 2005. 33(2): p. e11.

43. Pannucci, J., H. Cai, P.E. Pardington, E. Williams, R.T. Okinaka, C.R. Kuske, and R.B. Cary, Virulence signatures: microarray-based approaches to discovery and analysis. Biosens Bioelectron, 2004. 20(4): p. 706-718.

44. Pastinen, T., M. Raitio, K. Lindroos, P. Tainola, L. Peltonen, and A.C. Syvanen, A system for specific, high-throughput genotyping by allelespecific primer extension on microarrays. Genome Res, 2000. 10(7): p. 1031-1042.

45. Huber, M., A. Mundlein, E. Dornstauder, C. Schneeberger, C.B. Tempter, M.W. Mueller, and W.M. Schmidt, Accessing single nucleotide polymorphisms in genomic DNA by direct multiplex polymerase chain

-35CA 02723536 2010-11-04

WO 2009/137059

PCT/US2009/002809 reaction amplification on oligonucleotide microarrays. Anal Biochem, 2002. 303(1): p. 25-33.

46. Wahlestedt, C., P. Salmi, L. Good, J. Kela, T. Johnsson, T. Hokfelt, C. Broberger, F. Porreca, J. Lai, K. Ren, M. Ossipov, A. Koshkin, N.

Jakobsen, J. Skouv, H. Oerum, M.H. Jacobsen, and J. Wengel, Potent and nontoxic antisense oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000. 97(10): p. 5633-5638.

47. Braasch, D.A. and D.R. Corey, Locked nucleic acid (LNA): fine-tuning the recognition ofDNA and RNA. Chem Biol, 2001. 8(1): p. 1-7.

48. Boom, R., C.J. Sol, M.M. Salimans, C.L. Jansen, P.M. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa, Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol, 1990. 28(3): p. 495-503.

49. Boom, R., C.J. Sol, R. Heijtink, P.M. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa, Rapid purification of hepatitis B virus DNA from serum. J Clin Microbiol, 1991. 29(9): p. 1804-1811.

50. Cheek, B.J., A.B. Steel, M.P. Torres, Y.Y. Yu, and H. Yang, Chemiluminescence detection for hybridization assays on the flow-thru chip, a three-dimensional microchannel biochip. Anal Chem, 2001. 73(24): p. 5777-5783.

51. Cook, A.F., E. Vuocolo, and C.L. Brakel, Synthesis and hybridization of a series of biotinylated oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res, 1988. 16(9): p. 4077-4095.

52. Dineva, M.A., D. Candotti, F. Fletcher-Brown, J.P. Allain, and H. Lee, Simultaneous visual detection of multiple viral amplicons by dipstick assay. J Clin Microbiol, 2005. 43(8): p. 4015-4021.

53. Capaldi, S., R.C. Getts, and S.D. Jayasena, Signal amplification through nucleotide extension and excision on a dendritic DNA platform. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000. 28(7): p. E21.

54. Lowe, M., A. Spiro, Y.Z. Zhang, and R. Getts, Multiplexed, particle-based detection ofDNA using flow cytometry with 3DNA dendrimers for signal amplification. Cytometry A, 2004. 60(2): p. 135-144.

55. Stears, R.L., R.C. Getts, and S.R. Gullans, A novel, sensitive detection system for high-density microarrays using dendrimer technology. Physiol Genomics, 2000. 3(2): p. 93-99.